Instructional Leadership for Learning
o
Use of Data
Instructional Leadership Rubric
Component
Level I
Level II
Level III
Level IV
Rating/Evidence
Use of Data
Data collection is left to chance by individual actors.
Data are rarely analyzed or leveraged for
improvement efforts.
A process for data collection has been drafted.
Data are occasionally analyzed by individuals and occasionally leveraged for
improvement efforts.
A systematic process for data collection is in place.
Data are routinely analyzed by groups to inform collective action and leveraged for improvement efforts.
The school utilizes data to routinely inform decisions about
fulfilling the school mission, teaching and learning, and to guide all improvement efforts.
Rubric Level:
Evidence:
Curriculum
The decisions about what to teach are left to chance by
individual actors.
A guaranteed and viable curriculum is not evident.
The school has drafted curriculum documents.
The school has begun a process to provide a guaranteed and viable curriculum.
The school has a guaranteed and viable curriculum.
The school has
declared the important skills and content necessary for all students.
The school routinely monitors the attainment of the guaranteed and viable curriculum.
The curriculum is closely aligned to the mission of the school.
Instructional Leadership Rubric
Component
Level I
Level II
Level III
Level IV
Rating/Evidence
Instruction
The decisions about instruction are left to chance by individual actors.
Replication of success is unlikely.
The school has begun a process to identify instructional strategies that will improve student learning. The extent to which the strategies are used will vary.
Replication of success is unlikely.
The school encourages the use of research based instructional strategies. The school has created pockets of success.
Replication of success is dependent upon
showcasing the methods.
The school employs a research based
instructional program. The strategies are utilized by the staff to a large extent.
Replication of success is likely.
Rubric Level:
Evidence:
Assessment
The assessment system and the subsequent data are left to chance by individual actors.
The school has begun the process of
developing an assessment system. Some assessments are aligned to the
curriculum.
The school has an assessment system aligned to the curriculum.
Formative or
summative assessments provide information about student learning.
The school has an assessment system aligned to the curriculum.
The school utilizes a comprehensive system that provides timely feedback about teaching and learning.
Instructional Leadership for Learning
Data provides the power to…
Make good decisions, work intelligently,
work effectively and efficiently, change
things in better ways, know the impact of
our hard work, help us prepare for the
future, and know how to make our work
benefit all children.
Quality Information
Defined as the collection, management, and
use of information to enable the school or
district to make informed decisions, take
specific actions, and assess the results of
improvement efforts.
Quality Information
The analysis of research indicated that
effective schools must:
o
Transform data into evidence.
o
Data must be used consistently as the
basis for decision making.
o
Student performance results must also
provide guidance that informs educators
so as to allow mid-course adjustments.
o
Data feedback systems must rely on
Schools must collect and analyze data to
understand the…
o
Current and future needs of the school
community.
o
Ability of the current processes to meet
those needs.
o
Ways in which the school and community
are changing.
o
Root causes of problems.
o
Types of education programs and expertise
Four Essential Questions
from Dufour’s
Learning by Doing
o
What do we want our students to learn?
o
How will we know when they have learned it?
o
How will we respond if they have not learned
it?
o
How will we respond if they have already
Implications for Leadership
Effective superintendents ensure that each
school regularly examines the extent to which
it is meeting achievement targets. The
attainment of achievement goals is the
primary indicator of success.
Leadership Team Reflection
o
What are our current practices?
o
How do we monitor current practices?
o
What new practices do we need to put in place
to increase the academic achievement of our
students?
o
How will we monitor those practices?
o
What obstacles might impede progress?
o
What support systems will enhance our
progress?
o
What are our next steps?
Instructional Leadership Rubric
Component
Level I
Level II
Level III
Level IV
Rating/Evidence
Use of Data
Data collection is left to chance by individual actors.
Data are rarely analyzed or leveraged for
improvement efforts.
A process for data collection has been drafted.
Data are occasionally analyzed by individuals and occasionally leveraged for
improvement efforts.
A systematic process for data collection is in place.
Data are routinely analyzed by groups to inform collective action and leveraged for improvement efforts.
The school utilizes data to routinely inform decisions about
fulfilling the school mission, teaching and learning, and to guide all improvement efforts.
Rubric Level:
Evidence:
Instructional Leadership for Learning
Marzano’s “Guaranteed and Viable Curriculum”
o
Identify and communicate the content considered
essential for all students versus that considered
supplemental or necessary only for those seeking
postsecondary education.
o
Ensure that the essential content can be addressed
in the amount of time available for instruction.
o
Sequence and organize the essential content in
such a way that students have ample opportunity to
learn it.
Leadership Team Reflection
o
What are our current practices?
o
How do we monitor current practices?
o
What new practices do we need to put
in place to increase the academic
achievement of our students?
o
How will we monitor those practices?
o
What obstacles might impede progress?
o
What support systems will enhance our
progress?
Instructional Leadership Rubric
Component
Level I
Level II
Level III
Level IV
Rating/Evidence
Curriculum
The decisions about what to teach are left to chance by
individual actors.
A guaranteed and viable curriculum is not evident.
The school has drafted curriculum documents.
The school has begun a process to provide a guaranteed and viable curriculum.
The school has a guaranteed and viable curriculum.
The school has
declared the important skills and content necessary for all students.
The school routinely monitors the attainment of the guaranteed and viable curriculum.
The curriculum is closely aligned to the mission of the school.
Rubric Level:
Evidence:
Instructional Leadership for Learning
Core Tasks to Improve Teaching & Learning include. . .
o
Using instructional strategies that provide
students with focus, feedback, and
sufficient opportunity to master skills.
o
Using appropriate strategies to assess the
performance of students’ academic,
cognitive, and meta-cognitive skills.
o
Adapting instruction to meet individual
needs and engage students.
The Big Nine
o
Meta-analysis combines the results
from a number of studies to determine
the average effect of a given technique.
o
Researchers translate the results of this
meta-analysis into a unit of
measurement referred to as the
effect
The Big Nine
o
Effect size of .20 is small
o
Effect size of .50 is medium
The Big Nine
Instructional Strategy
Ave. ES
%ile
Gain
Identifying similarities & differences
1.61
45
Summarizing & Note Taking
1.00
34
Reinforcing Effort and Providing
Recognition
.80
29
Homework & Practice
.77
28
Nonlinguistic Representation
.75
27
Cooperative Learning
.73
27
Setting Goals & Providing Feedback
.61
23
Planning for Instruction
o
Instructional planning needs to be
thoughtful and purposeful.
o
Instructional planning is more than
stringing together as many activities as
can be completed in a unit of study.
o
The use of instructional strategies is to
help the learner remember and apply
information and skills, not just do
Planning for Instruction
Teaching Schema for Mastery Learners
from Improving Student Learning One Teacher at a Time
o
Setting Goals
o
Accessing Prior Knowledge
o
New Information
o
Applying declarative & procedural
knowledge
o
Generalize or summarize
Leadership Team Reflection
o
What are our current practices?
o
How do we monitor current practices?
o
What new practices do we need to put in
place to increase the academic achievement
of our students?
o
How will we monitor those practices?
o
What obstacles might impede progress?
o
What support systems will enhance our
Instructional Leadership Rubric
Component
Level I
Level II
Level III
Level IV
Rating/Evidence
Instruction
The decisions about instruction are left to chance by individual actors.
Replication of success is unlikely.
The school has begun a process to identify instructional strategies that will improve student learning. The extent to which the strategies are used will vary.
Replication of success is unlikely.
The school encourages the use of research based instructional strategies. The school has created pockets of success.
Replication of success is dependent upon showcasing the methods.
The school employs a research based
instructional program. The strategies are utilized by the staff to a large extent.
Replication of success is likely.
Rubric Level:
Evidence:
Instructional Leadership for Learning
Classroom-based
State
Tests
National
Tests
Multiple Tools, Different
Purposes
Tools
Purposes
National Tests
National Comparison
Summative Snapshot
New State Tests – NeSA
NeSA-R
NeSA-M
NeSA-S
NeSA-W
State Comparison
State and Federal
Accountability
Summative Snapshot
Classroom-based
Assessment
Instructional
information
Lezotte’s Frequent Monitoring of
Student Progress
o
The First Generation: In the effective school,
student academic progress is measured
frequently through a variety of assessment
procedures. The results of these assessments
are used to improve individual student
Lezotte’s Frequent Monitoring of
Student Progress
o
The Second Generation: The use of
technology will permit teachers to do a
better job of monitoring their students’
progress.
o
A shift will occur from standardized
norm-referenced paper-pencil tests and toward
curricular-based, criterion-referenced
Assessment Users and Uses
o
Classroom Level
Classroom Level
Student:
Am I succeeding?
Does my teacher think I’m capable of success?
Teacher:
What does this student need?
Are my students improving?
Parents:
Is my child succeeding?
Is this teacher doing a good job?
Instructional Support Level
Principal:
Is this teacher producing results in the form of
student learning?
Is instruction in our building producing
results?
Are our students qualifying for college?
Curriculum Director:
Is our program of instruction working?
Policy-Making Level
Superintendent:
Are our programs of instruction producing results in terms of
student learning?
Which schools deserve or need more or fewer resources?
School Board:
Are our students learning and succeeding and how much is it
costing us?
Department of Education:
Are programs across the state producing results?
Legislature:
Leadership Team Reflection
o
What are our current practices?
o
How do we monitor current practices?
o
What new practices do we need to put in
place to increase the academic
achievement of our students?
o
How will we monitor those practices?
o
What obstacles might impede progress?
o
What support systems will enhance our
Instructional Leadership Rubric
Component
Level I
Level II
Level III
Level IV
Rating/Evidence
Assessment
The assessment system and the subsequent data are left to chance by individual actors.
The school has begun the process of
developing an assessment system. Some assessments are aligned to the
curriculum.
The school has an assessment system aligned to the curriculum.
Formative or
summative assessments provide information about student learning.
The school has an assessment system aligned to the curriculum.
The school utilizes a comprehensive system that provides timely feedback about teaching and learning.