• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Chapter18 - Statistical Applications in Quality Mgt

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2019

Membagikan "Chapter18 - Statistical Applications in Quality Mgt"

Copied!
74
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Statistics for Managers

Using Microsoft® Excel

5th Edition

Chapter 18

(2)

Learning Objectives

In this chapter, you learn:

The basic themes of quality management and

Deming’s 14 points

The basic aspects of Six Sigma management

How to construct various control charts

Which control chart to use for a particular

type of data

(3)

Chapter Overview

Quality Management and

Tools for Improvement

Deming’s 14

Points

Six Sigma

®

Management

Process

Capability

Philosophy of

Quality

Tools for Quality

Improvement

Control

Charts

p chart

(4)

Total Quality Management

Primary focus is on process improvement

Most variation in a process is due to the

system, not the individual

Teamwork is integral to quality management

Customer satisfaction is a primary goal

Organization transformation is necessary

It is important to remove fear

(5)

Deming’s 14 Points

1. Create a constancy of purpose toward improvement

become more competitive, stay in business, and provide

jobs

2. Adopt the new philosophy

Better to improve now than to react to problems later

3. Stop depending on inspection to achieve quality -- build in

quality from the start

Inspection to find defects at the end of production is too

late

4. Stop awarding contracts on the basis of low bids

(6)

Deming’s 14 Points

5. Improve the system continuously to improve quality and thus

constantly reduce costs

6. Institute training on the job

Workers and managers must know the difference between

common cause and special cause variation

7. Institute leadership

Know the difference between leadership and supervision

8. Drive out fear so that everyone may work effectively.

(7)

Deming’s 14 Points

10. Eliminate slogans and targets for the workforce

They can create adversarial relationships

11. Eliminate quotas and management by numerical goals

12. Remove barriers to pride of workmanship

13. Institute a vigorous program of education and

self-improvement

(8)

The Shewhart-Deming Cycle

The

Shewhart-Deming

Cycle

The key is a

continuous cycle

of improvement

Act

Plan

Do

(9)

Six Sigma

®

Management

A method for breaking a process into a series of steps:

The goal is to reduce defects and produce near

perfect results

The Six Sigma® approach allows for a shift of as

much as 1.5 standard deviations, so is essentially a

±4.5 standard deviation goal

The mean of a normal distribution ±4.5 standard

(10)

The Six Sigma

®

DMAIC Model

DMAIC represents

Define -- define the problem to be solved; list costs,

benefits, and impact to customer

Measure – need consistent measurements for each

Critical-to-Quality characteristic

Analyze – find the root causes of defects

Improve – use experiments to determine importance

of each Critical-to-Quality variable

(11)

Theory of Control Charts

A process is a repeatable series of steps

leading to a specific goal

Control Charts are used to monitor variation

in a measured value from a process

Inherent variation refers to process variation

(12)

Theory of Control Charts

Control charts indicate when changes in data are due

to:

Special or assignable causes

Fluctuations not inherent to a process

Data outside control limits or trend

Represents problems to be corrected or improvements to

incorporate into the process

Chance or common causes

Inherent random variations

(13)

Process Variation

Total Process

Variation

Common Cause

Variation

Special Cause

Variation

=

+

Variation is natural; inherent in the world

around us

No two products or service experiences are

exactly the same

With a fine enough gauge, all things can be

(14)

Process Variation

Total Process

Variation

Common Cause

Variation

Special Cause

Variation

=

+

People

Machines

Materials

Methods

Measurement

Environment

(15)

Process Variation

Total Process

Variation

Common Cause

Variation

Special Cause

Variation

=

+

Common cause variation

naturally occurring and expected

the result of normal variation in materials,

(16)

Process Variation

Total Process

Variation

Common Cause

Variation

Special Cause

Variation

=

+

Special cause variation

abnormal or unexpected variation

has an assignable cause

variation beyond what is considered

(17)

Control Limits

Process Average

UCL = Process Mean + 3 Standard Deviations

LCL = Process Mean – 3 Standard Deviations

UCL

LCL

+3σ

-

time

(18)

Control Chart Basics

Process Mean

UCL = Process Mean + 3 Standard Deviations

LCL = Process Mean – 3 Standard Deviations

UCL

LCL

+3σ

-

Common Cause

Variation: range of

expected

variability

Special Cause Variation:

Range of

unexpected

variability

(19)

Process Variability

Process Mean

UCL = Process Mean + 3 Standard Deviations

LCL = Process Mean – 3 Standard Deviations

UCL

LCL

±3σ

→ 99.7% of

process values should

be in this range

time

Special Cause of Variation:

(20)

Using Control Charts

Control Charts are used to check for process control

(21)

In-control Process

A process is said to be in control when the

control chart does not indicate any

out-of-control condition

Contains only common causes of variation

If the common causes of variation is small, then

control chart can be used to monitor the process

If the common causes of variation is too large, you

(22)

Process In Control

Process in control: points are randomly

distributed around the center line and all

points are within the control limits

UCL

LCL

time

(23)

Process Not in Control

Out of control conditions:

One or more points outside control limits

8 or more points in a row on one side of the

center line

8 or more points in a row moving in the same

(24)

Process Not in Control

One or more points outside

control limits

UCL

LCL

Eight or more points in a row on one

side of the center line

UCL

LCL

Eight or more points in a row

moving in the same direction

UCL

LCL

Process

Average

Process

Average

(25)

Out-of-control Processes

When the control chart indicates an

out-of-control condition (a point outside the out-of-control

limits or exhibiting trend, for example)

Contains both common causes of variation and

assignable causes of variation

The assignable causes of variation must be

identified

If detrimental to the quality, assignable causes of

variation must be removed

(26)

Control Chart for the

Proportion: p Chart

Control chart for proportions

Is an attribute chart

Shows proportion of nonconforming items

Example -- Computer chips: Count the number

of defective chips and divide by total chips

inspected

Chip is either defective or not defective

(27)

Control Chart for the

Proportion: p Chart

Used with equal or unequal sample sizes

(subgroups) over time

Unequal sizes should not differ by more than

±25% from average sample sizes

(28)

Creating a p Chart

Calculate subgroup proportions

Graph subgroup proportions

Compute mean proportion

(29)

Average of Subgroup

Proportions

The average of subgroup proportions =

p

where:

If equal sample sizes:

If unequal sample sizes:

(30)

Computing Control Limits

The upper and lower control limits for a p chart are

The standard deviation for the subgroup proportions

is

UCL = Average Proportion + 3 Standard Deviations

LCL = Average Proportion – 3 Standard Deviations

n

)

p

)(1

p

(

where:

(31)

Computing Control Limits

The upper and lower control limits for the p

chart are

n

Proportions are never

negative, so if the

calculated lower

control limit is

(32)

p Chart Example

You are the manager of a 500-room hotel.

You want to achieve the highest level of

(33)

p Chart Example

# Not

Day

# Rooms

Ready

Proportion

1

200

16

0.080

2

200

7

0.035

3

200

21

0.105

4

200

17

0.085

5

200

25

0.125

6

200

19

0.095

(34)
(35)

p Chart Example

p = .0864

UCL = .1460

LCL = .0268

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

P

Day

Individual points are distributed around p without any pattern. Any

improvement in the process must come from reduction of

common-cause variation, which is the responsibility of management.

_

(36)

Understanding Process Variability:

Red Bead Experiment

The experiment:

From a box with 20% red beads and 80% white

beads, have “workers” scoop out 50 beads

Tell the workers their job is to get white beads

Some workers will get better over time, some will

(37)

Morals of the

Red Bead Experiment

1.

Variation is an inherent part of any process.

2.

The system is primarily responsible for worker performance.

3.

Only management can change the system.

4.

Some workers will always be above average, and some will

be below.

5.

Setting unrealistic goals is detrimental to a firm’s

(38)

R chart and X chart

Used for measured numeric data from a

process

Start with at least 20 subgroups of observed

values

Subgroups usually contain 3 to 6

observations each

For the process to be in control, both the R

(39)

Example: Subgroups

Process measurements:

Subgroup measures

Subgroup

number

Individual measurements

(subgroup size = 4)

Mean, X

Range, R

1

Average

subgroup

mean

=

Average

subgroup

range =

R

(40)

The R Chart

Monitors variability in a process

The characteristic of interest is measured on a

numerical scale

Is a variables control

chart

Shows the sample range over time

Range = difference between smallest and

(41)

The R Chart

1.

Find the mean of the subgroup ranges (the

center line of the R chart)

2.

Compute the upper and lower control limits

for the R chart

3.

Use lines to show the center and control

limits on the R chart

4.

Plot the successive subgroup ranges as a

(42)

Average of Subgroup Ranges

k

R

R

i

Average of subgroup ranges:

where:

R

i

= i

th

subgroup range

(43)

R Chart Control Limits

The upper and lower control limits for an R chart are

)

R

(

D

LCL

)

R

(

D

UCL

3

4

where:

D

4

and D

3

are taken from the table

(44)

R Chart Example

You are the manager of a 500-room hotel.

You want to analyze the time it takes to

(45)

R Chart Example

Day

Subgroup

(46)
(47)

R Chart

Control Chart Solution

UCL = 8.232

0

2

4

6

8

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Minutes

Day

LCL = 0

R = 3.894

_

(48)

The X Chart

Shows the means of successive subgroups

over time

Monitors process average

Must be preceded by examination of the R

(49)

The X Chart

Compute the mean of the subgroup means (the

center line of the X chart)

Compute the upper and lower control limits for

the X chart

Graph the subgroup means

(50)

Average of Subgroup

Means

k

X

X

i

Average of subgroup means:

where:

X

i

= i

th

subgroup average

(51)

Computing Control Limits

The upper and lower control limits for an X chart are

generally defined as

Use to estimate the standard deviation of the

process average, where d

2

is from appendix Table E.11

UCL = Process Average + 3 Standard Deviations

LCL = Process Average – 3 Standard Deviations

n

d

R

(52)

Computing Control Limits

The upper and lower control limits for an X chart are

generally defined as

so

UCL = Process Average + 3 Standard Deviations

LCL = Process Average – 3 Standard Deviations

(53)

Computing Control Limits

Simplify the control limit calculations by using

(54)

X Chart Example

You are the manager of a 500-room hotel.

You want to analyze the time it takes to

(55)

X Chart Example

Day

Subgroup

(56)

X Chart

Control Limits Solution

(57)

X Chart

Control Chart Solution

UCL = 8.061

LCL = 3.567

0

2

4

6

8

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Minutes

Day

X = 5.814

__

(58)

Process Capability

Process capability is the ability of a process to

consistently meet specified customer-driven

requirements

Specification limits are set by management in

response to customers’ expectations

The upper specification limit (USL) is the largest

value that can be obtained and still conform to

customers’ expectations

The lower specification limit (LSL) is the smallest

(59)

Estimating Process Capability

Must first have an in-control process

Estimate the percentage of product or service

within specification

Assume the population of X

values is

approximately normally distributed with mean

estimated by and standard deviation

(60)

Estimating Process Capability

For a characteristic with a LSL and a USL

Where

Z

is a standardized normal random variable

within

be

(61)

Estimating Process Capability

For a characteristic with only an USL

Where

Z

is a standardized normal random variable

within

be

(62)

Estimating Process Capability

For a characteristic with only a LSL

Where

Z

is a standardized normal random variable

within

be

will

P(outcome

(63)

Process Capability

Example

You are the manager of a 500-room hotel.

You have instituted a policy that 99% of all

luggage deliveries must be completed within

ten minutes or less. For seven days, you

(64)

Process Capability

Example

Day

Subgroup

(65)

Process Capability

Example

Therefore, we estimate that 99.38% of the luggage deliveries will

be made within the ten minutes or less specification. The process is

capable of meeting the 99% goal.

(66)

Capability Indices

A process capability index is an aggregate

measure of a process’s ability to meet

specification limits

The larger the value, the more capable a

(67)

C

p

Index

A measure of potential process performance is the

Cp index

C

p

> 1 implies a process has the potential of having

more than 99.73% of outcomes within specifications

C

p

> 2 implies a process has the potential of meeting the

expectations set forth in six sigma management

spread

spread

ion

specificat

)

/

(

6

R

d

2

process

LSL

USL

(68)

CPL and CPU

To measure capability in terms of actual process

performance:

CPL (CPU)

> 1 implies that the process mean is more

than 3 standard deviation away from the lower

(upper) specification limit

(69)

CPL and CPU

Used for one-sided specification limits

Use CPU when a characteristic only has a UCL

Use CPL when a characteristic only has an

(70)

C

pk

Index

The most commonly used capability index is the C

pk

index

Measures actual process performance for characteristics with

two-sided specification limits

C

pk

= min(CPL, CPU)

C

pk

= 1 indicates that the process average is 3 standard

deviation away from the closest specification limit

Larger C

pk

indicates greater capability of meeting the

(71)

Process Capability

Example

You are the manager of a 500-room hotel.

You have instituted a policy that all luggage

deliveries must be completed within ten

(72)

Process Capability

(73)

Chapter Summary

Reviewed the philosophy of quality management

Deming’s 14 points

Discussed Six Sigma

®

Management

Reduce defects to no more than 3.4 per million

Uses DMAIC model for process improvement

Discussed the theory of control charts

Common cause variation vs. special cause

variation

(74)

Chapter Summary

Constructed and interpreted p charts

Constructed and interpreted

X and R charts

Obtained and interpreted process capability

measures

Gambar

Table E.11 (n = 5)

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

The financial costs of getting this interaction wrong can be significant – a recent major study of business costs resulting from conflict found, for example, that “ company-

penjelasan (aanwijzing) secara online melalui website : lpse.metrokota.go.id untuk paket Pekerjaan Pengadaan Alat alat Kedokteran, Kesehatan dan KB Tahun Anggaran 2012, sebagai

Jenis kata yang dapat dijadikan sebagai bentuk dasar verba berproses gabung adalah verba pangkal, verba asal, ajektiva, nomina, numeralia, dan adverbia?. Contoh-contoh peng-

RPJMD Kabupaten Sanggau Tahun 2014-2019 memuat informasi tentang sumber daya yang diperlukan, keluaran serta dampak dari perencanaan pembangunan selama 5 (lima) tahun

Sebagai sebuah sistem yang menggunakan menggunakan airfoil sebagai komponennya, maka pendisainan turbin aliran crossflow sangat di pengaruhi oleh disain sudu runnernya.

Berdasarkan Berita Acara Evaluasi/Penilaian Penawaran Administrasi dan Teknis maka Panitia Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Bappeda Kota Sabang mengumumkan Pemenang lelang

Paket pengadaan ini terbuka untuk penyedia barang/jasa yang terigistrasi pada Layanan Pengadaan Secara Elektronik (LPSE) dan memenuhi persyaratan memiliki SIUP yang masih

To move toward a goal of reducing water impacts of biofuels, a policy bridge will likely be needed to encourage growth of new technologies that develop both traditional