• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

MATHAMATICAL TIME ESTIMATION OF VARIOUS

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Membagikan "MATHAMATICAL TIME ESTIMATION OF VARIOUS"

Copied!
13
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

1 | P a g e

Synopsis of the project

MATHAMATICAL TIME ESTIMATION OF VARIOUS

PARTS IN 3D PRINTER

to be submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Project of

MEE2016

NAME

REG.No

(2)

2 | P a g e

BONAFIDE CERTIFICATE

This is to certify that the following students have successfully completed the project as a part of their CAL J-Project Component for the subject,

RAPID MANUFACTURING AND TECHNOLOGY (MEE2016)

The students worked under the guidance of their Faculty, Prof.

M.Sugavaneswaran and were supported by the School Of Mechanical (SMEC, VIT University).

Name of the student:

 MANIK CHAUHAN (15BEM0096)

(3)

3 | P a g e

INDEX

S.No

Title

Page No.

1.

Acknowledgement

4

2.

Introduction

5

3.

Top 5 3D Printing Factors

That Affect Printing Time.

6,7

4.

Analysis

8

5.

Parts

9

6.

Calculation

10,11

7.

Result

12

(4)

4 | P a g e

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

A project provides you with deeper understanding of the theoretical

topics that is learnt in the class. On this occasion, I would like to express our

heartfelt gratitude to our faculty, Prof. M.SUGAVANESWARAN for his

relentless guidance and encouragement throughout the completion of this

project.

We would like to thank everyone who abetted us during the course of our

work. Specially the lab-assistant of TT – 014 Lab for providing us all facilities

and guidance wherever required.

Last but not the least, we would like to thank VIT University for providing us

with an opportunity to work on such projects to enhance our practical

knowledge and exemplifying the process of making an Engineer.

Thank you

Manik Chauhan

(5)

5 | P a g e

INTRODUCTION

Time estimation is essential for production scheduling, machine selection, and cost estimation. Acquisition of the accurate result requires an understanding of the factors that influence the printing time.

One of the main objectives of this research is to statistically illustrate the relation between the geometric attributes and build time of the parts. Hence, the effect of the most important geometric parameters is analyzed. The final model that will be developed in this work cannot be applied to all parts and processes. The scope of this research is limited to the parts that can fit in a bounding box that is less than 10 inches in all dimensions.

In this project we are going to find the approximate time estimation of a simple part in 3D Printing mathematically. Afterwards we will compare our estimated time with the machine estimated time,

(6)

6 | P a g e

Top 5 3D Printing Factors That Affect Printing

Time

1. Resolution and Layer Thickness :- The biggest factor to

consider is resolution or layer thickness. The 3D printers have the capability of building from .005 to .013 (layer resolution). This resolution is represented by the thickness of the tool path.

Printing at .005 is going to produce some very sharp details; it’s

also going to reduce any stepping that might occur when building curves. The recommendation is to use this resolution when files have fine details. There is one drawback to printing in .005, and that is the amount of time needed to complete the part. It can take up to 3 times longer than a standard .010 build.

(7)

7 | P a g e

3. Print Orientation :- The next specification to think about is the part positioning on a build tray. The difference between a vertical or horizontal positioning before it is sliced is going to affect the strength and quality of the part. For example, if the part is in the shape of a dowel or rod, the software is going to slice along the X-axis. If the rod is horizontal along the X-axis it will be a fairly strong part but the curves might show some stepping. If the same part is to be printed vertically the tool path is still going to be along to X-axis. However, there will be a nice round edge but a weaker part due to the slice layers required. This will also affect the time needed to build, ultimately affecting the costs.

4. Support Material :- The support style selected is also important to the cost and time. Choices for Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) 3D printers include basic, break-away, SMART, and surround, can have an impact on how much support estimation for 3d printing.

(8)

8 | P a g e

ANALYSIS

The mathematical formula to calculate the time estimation of a 3D printer is given by.

Print Time=0.005390527+(0.064608959*SA)+(0.102169623*V)-(0.011981463*XY)- (0.001236407*ZSA)

Attributes

X Basic Geometry, length

Y Basic Geometry, width

Z Basic Geometry, height

V Basic Geometry, volume

SA Surface Area

ZSA Product of the part height and surface area

XY Projected area of part to the working plane

In order to calculate the time estimation and for comparison we took 4 parts with a particular simple shape (mainly cube and cuboid).

(9)

9 | P a g e

PARTS

Figure 1: 6x6x6 (inches) Figure 2: 6x9x6 (inches)

(10)

10 | P a g e

CALCULATION

Input: (5X5X4)

Experimental time taken(Total time– Support structure and heating time):

 19 : 28 – 1 : 30 = 17hours 58minutes

Now,

Print Time=0.005390527+(0.064608959*SA)+(0.102169623*V)-(0.011981463*XY) - (0.001236407*ZSA)

So print time is : 17.72 hour = 17 hour 43 min

Input: (6X6X6)

Experimental time taken(Total time– Support structure and heating time):

 36 : 08 – 1 : 30 = 34hours 38minutes

Now,

Print Time=0.005390527+(0.064608959*SA)+(0.102169623*V)-(0.011981463*XY) - (0.001236407*ZSA)

(11)

11 | P a g e

Input: (7X7X6)

Experimental time taken(Total time– support structure time):

 48 : 51 – 1 : 30 = 47hours 21minutes

Now,

Print Time=0.005390527+(0.064608959*SA)+(0.102169623*V)-(0.011981463*XY) - (0.001236407*ZSA)

So print time is : 44.76 hour = 44 hour 46 min

Input: (6X9X6)

Experimental time taken(Total time– Support structure and heating time):

 53 : 29 – 1:30 = 51hours 59minutes Now,

Print Time=0.005390527+(0.064608959*SA)+(0.102169623*V)-(0.011981463*XY) - (0.001236407*ZSA)

(12)

12 | P a g e

RESULT

After all the mathematical calculation we get the following result:

S.NO PARTS MATERIAL

USED(cm^3)

ESTIMATED TIME

ACTUAL TIME

DIFFERENCE (hour)

ERROR %

1 5x5x4 1659.595 17hr 43min 17hr 58min 0.24 1.33%

2 6x6x6 3580.505 34hr 03min 34hr 38min 0.596 1.72%

3 7x7x6 4871.414 44hr 46min 47hr 21min 2.59 5.46%

(13)

13 | P a g e

CONCLUSION

From this experiment and research I got to know about mathematical formula to calculate time estimation.

There is still no accurate formula to calculate time estimation accurately.

But by this formula we can easily calculate approximate value for simple 3D printing. But we can get approximate time to calculate the print time of the given simple part. Complex structure time estimation is tough to calculate.

From the given result we can calculate parts of less volume more accurately than the parts with greater volume as can be concluded with the % error increase. So greater the volume, greater will be the error and lesser be the accuracy (for this formula).

And also when the dimensions exceed 10 inches this formula can’t be used as it shows inaccurate value with greater error.

This time estimation is very useful as it gives us the time before hand and through this we can further estimate the price of that particular part.

Gambar

Figure 3: 5x5x4 (inches)             Figure 4: 7x7x6 (inches)

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

(Sample #1). The average classification error was very small, less than 1%. The error depended to a large extent on the color pattern complexity the sample image. Accuracy in

With these lower prices for spare parts, there is less reason to fear the possibility of higher maintenance costs with a multi-manufacturer and/or refurbished fleet of forklift

Various methods have been so far explored to calculate the battery SoH, such as through the calculation of battery impedance or battery capacity using Kalman Filter

As these waves show dispersion near cutoff, thereby accurately analyzing first order mode cut-off frequency, we can calculate the equivalent ionospheric electron densities of the

From the estimation results, the proposed technique accurately estimates the battery model parameters with an error of just 0.05of the cases.. Hence this method can be employed in

CONCLUSION The results of the analysis and the hypothesis testing and with the error rate of α = 0.05, it can be concluded that: The use of Flip PDF Corporate learning media in

CONCLUSION Based on this study, it can be concluded that the volume of intracerebral hemorrhage has a significant correlation with the 30-day mortality in stroke patients with

Conclusion Based on the result and discussion of slope stability analysis with terracing, it can be concluded as follows: Design of terraces on the slopes of Sendangmulyo Wonogiri