LAMPIRAN 1
KUESIONER PENELITIAN
HUBUNGAN KONSEP HEALTH BELIEF MODEL (HBM) DENGAN
PERILAKU PENGGUNAAN KONDOM PADA ANAK BUAH KAPAL
(ABK) DI PELABUHAN BELAWAN TAHUN 2012
No. urut responden
:
Nama kapal
:
Petunjuk : Isilah Pertanyaan di bawah ini
Beri tanda silang (X) atau (
√) pada kotak yang telah tersedia sesuai
dengan jawaban responden
1. Faktor Sosiodemografi
A.01. Umur anda saat ini :………..
A.02. Pendidikan terakhir yang diselesaikan :
SD/sederajat
SMP/sederajat
SMA-D1
D3-S3
A.03. Status pernikahan :
Belum menikah
Menikah
Duda
Prilaku seksual terkait Penggunaan Kondom
I.01. Apakah anda pernah berhubungan seksual dengan pekerja seksual komersil
(PSK)?
Ya
Tidak
I.02. Jika ya, siapa yang biasanya menjadi pasangan seksual komersil anda?
Wanita Penjaja Seks
Pria Penjaja Seks
Waria Penjaja Seks
I.03. Apakah anda menggunakan kondom ketika berhubungan seksual dengan PSK
tersebut?
Selalu
Kadang-kadang
Tidak pernah
2. Faktor Sosiopsikologi (Dorongan PSK)
Beri tanda silang (X) atau (
√) pada kotak yang telah
tersedia sesuai dengan jawaban responden
Selalu Kadang
kadang
Tidak
Pernah
B.01. Apakah PSK yang menjadi pasangan seksual
anda selalu menyediakan kondom pada saat
akan berhubungan?
B.02
Apakah anda pernah diingatkan oleh PSK
tentang bahaya tertular penyakit seksual jika
anda tidak memakai kondom?
B.03
Apakah anda pernah dirayu oleh PSK untuk
memakai kondom pada saat akan melakukan
hubungan seksual dengannya?
B.04
Pernahkan anda ditolak oleh PSK ketika anda
tidak mau memakai kondom saat berhubungan
seksual?
3. Faktor Struktural (Pengetahuan)
Petunjuk : Isilah Pertanyaan di bawah ini
Beri tanda silang (X) atau (
√) pada kotak yang telah tersedia, jawaban
yang dipilih boleh lebih dari satu
C.01. AIDS disebabkan oleh :
Bakteri
Virus
Tidak tahu
Dari ibu yang positif HIV kepada bayinya pada saat hamil, melahirkan dan
menyusui
Penggunaan jarum suntik yang telah tercemar HIV
Menggunakan toilet/jamban bersama dengan penderita HIV
Tranfusi darah yang tidak aman dari virus HIV
C.03. Penularan HIV dapat dicegah dengan cara : (jawaban boleh lebih dari satu)
Tidak melakukan hubungan seks
Setia pada satu pasangan seksual yang bebas HIV
Meminum antibiotik/obat lainnya sebelum berhubungan seks
Mencuci alat kelamin setelah berhubungan seks
Menggunakan kondom sewaktu berhubungan seks
Tidak menggunakan jarum suntik secara bergantian
Hanya berhubungan seks dengan orang yang berpenampilan sehat
C.04. Fungsi kondom :
Mencegah penularan HIV
Menghalangi masuknya sperma ke dalam tubuh wanita
Mencegah kehamilan
C.05. AIDS bisa disembuhkan dengan pengobatan :
Ya
Tidak
4. Persepsi berisiko tertular HIV/AIDS
D.04. Apakah anda merasa anda berisiko untuk tertular HIV/AIDS?
Ya
Tidak
Jika Ya, sebutkan alasannya :
Saya sering menggunakan jasa PSK
Saya berhubungan dengan orang-orang yang terkena HIV/AIDS
Jika Tidak, sebutkan alasannya :
Berhubungan seksual dengan PSK yang bersih tidak membuat kita tertular
HIV/AIDS
5. Persepsi keseriusan
Untuk pertanyaan berikut, Beri tanda silang (X) atau (
√) pada kotak yang telah
tersedia sesuai dengan jawaban responden dengan keterangan sebagai berikut :
SS
: Sangat Setuju
S
: Setuju
N
: Netral
TS
: Tidak Setuju
STS
: Sangat Tidak Setuju
Setujukah anda dengan dampak yang disebutkan dibawah ini
jika anda terkena HIV/AIDS
SS S
N TS STS
E.01
Kehilangan pekerjaan
E.02
Biaya pengobatannya yang mahal dan tidak bisa
disembuhkan
E.03
Dikucilkan keluarga dan teman-teman
E.04
Rasa malu
E.05
Kehilangan masa depan
6. Persepsi Positif penggunaan kondom
Manfaat pemakaian kondom
SS S
N TS STS
F.01
Menggunakan kondom dapat mencegah tertular HIV
F.02
Memakai kondom dapat melindungi kita dari AIDS
F.03
Kondom adalah pelindung paling mudah dan murah
F.04
Penggunaan kondom membuat perasaan lebih aman
F.05
Dengan kondom hubungan seks terasa lebih nikmat
7. Persepsi negatif penggunaan kondom
Persepsi negatif
SS S
N TS STS
G.01 Menggunakan kondom dapat mengurangi kenikmatan
G.02 Menggunakan kondom mengganggu saat berhubungan
G.03 Saya pikir penggunaan kondom bukan hal yang penting
8. Seberapa besar keyakinan anda terhadap kemampuan yang anda miliki
untuk menggunakan kondom?
SY : Sangat Yakin
Y
: Yakin
N
: Netral
TY : Tidak Yakin
STY : Sangat Tidak Yakin
Keyakinan akan kemampuan diri
SY Y N TY STY
H.01 Kemampuan saya untuk selalu menggunakan kondom
lebih baik dari teman-teman yang lain
H.02 Dengan informasi yang saya dapatkan saya bisa
menggunakan kondom dengan benar
H.03 Penggunaan kondom adalah hal yang mudah dilakukan
tanpa perlu pertimbangan
H.04 Saya yakin dapat selalu menggunakan kondom jika
berhubungan seks dengan bukan pasangan tetap saya
H.05 Saya yakin dapat menolak berhubungan seks jika
pasangan seks tidak tetap saya tidak mengijinkan saya
menggunakan kondom
LAMPIRAN 2
MASTER DATA
Resp. Umur Pend. Stts PSK Tahu Risk Ser. Pos. Neg. Yak. Kond.
1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 3 2 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 2 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 1 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5 2 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 6 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 7 1 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 9 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 10 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 11 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 12 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 13 1 3 2 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 14 2 2 2 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 15 1 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 16 1 3 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 17 2 2 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 18 1 3 2 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 19 1 2 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 20 1 3 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 21 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 22 1 2 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 23 1 3 2 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 24 1 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 26 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 27 2 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 28 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 2 3 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 30 2 2 2 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 31 2 2 2 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 32 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 33 1 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 34 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Res. Umur Pend. Stts PSK Tahu Risk Ser. Pos. Neg. Yak. Kond. 36 2 2 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 37 1 2 2 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 38 1 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 39 1 1 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 40 2 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 41 2 2 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 42 2 1 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 43 2 2 2 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 44 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 45 2 3 2 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 46 2 2 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 47 1 2 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 48 2 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 49 1 3 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 50 2 2 2 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 51 2 3 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 52 2 2 2 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 53 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 54 2 2 2 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 55 2 3 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 56 2 2 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 57 1 1 2 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 58 1 2 2 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 59 1 2 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 60 1 3 2 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 61 2 2 2 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 62 2 2 2 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 63 1 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 64 2 3 2 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 65 1 2 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 66 1 2 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 67 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 68 2 2 2 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 69 2 3 2 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 70 2 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Res. Umur Pend. Stts PSK Tahu Risk Ser. Pos. Neg. Yak. Kond. 71 2 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 72 2 1 2 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 73 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 74 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 75 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 76 1 2 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 77 2 2 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 78 2 2 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 79 2 2 2 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 80 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 81 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 82 1 2 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 83 1 2 2 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 84 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 85 2 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 86 2 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 87 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 88 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 89 2 1 2 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 90 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 91 1 2 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 92 2 3 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 93 2 3 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 94 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 95 1 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
Lampiran 3
Hasil Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas
Validitas Dorongan PSK
Reliabilitas Dorongan PSK
Correlations 1 .489** .621** .300 .749** .006 .000 .107 .000 30 30 30 30 30 .489** 1 .673** .534** .836** .006 .000 .002 .000 30 30 30 30 30 .621** .673** 1 .663** .900** .000 .000 .000 .000 30 30 30 30 30 .300 .534** .663** 1 .764** .107 .002 .000 .000 30 30 30 30 30 .749** .836** .900** .764** 1 .000 .000 .000 .000 30 30 30 30 30 Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N Dor PSK 1 Dor PSK 2 Dor PSK 3 Dor PSK 4 Dor PSK TotalDor PSK 1 Dor PSK 2 Dor PSK 3 Dor PSK 4 Dor PSK Total
Correlation is s ignificant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). **.
Reliability Statistics
.817 5
Cronbach's
Validitas Pengetahuan
Reliabilitas Pengetahuan
Correlations 1 .383* .460** .376* -.030 -.001 -.429* .457* .033 .009 .037 .872 .995 .016 .011 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 30 .383* 1 .562** .555** .192 .244 .016 .783** .033 .001 .001 .300 .187 .932 .000 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 30 .460** .562** 1 .620** -.009 .339 .067 .857** .009 .001 .000 .964 .062 .719 .000 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 30 .376* .555** .620** 1 .339 .289 -.143 .805** .037 .001 .000 .062 .115 .444 .000 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 30 -.030 .192 -.009 .339 1 .357* .101 .288 .872 .300 .964 .062 .049 .588 .122 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 30 -.001 .244 .339 .289 .357* 1 .328 .532** .995 .187 .062 .115 .049 .071 .002 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 30 -.429* .016 .067 -.143 .101 .328 1 .099 .016 .932 .719 .444 .588 .071 .602 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 30 .457* .783** .857** .805** .288 .532** .099 1 .011 .000 .000 .000 .122 .002 .602 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N Tahu 1 Tahu 2 Tahu 3 Tahu 4 Tahu 5 Tahu 6 Tahu 7 Tahu TotalTahu 1 Tahu 2 Tahu 3 Tahu 4 Tahu 5 Tahu 6 Tahu 7 Tahu Total
Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). *.
Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). **.
Reliability Statistics
.778 6
Cronbach's
Validitas Persepsi Keseriusan
Reliabilitas Persepsi Keseriusan
Correlations 1 .823** .764** .781** .669** .888** .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 31 31 31 31 31 30 .823** 1 .660** .862** .711** .890** .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 31 31 31 31 31 30 .764** .660** 1 .644** .837** .877** .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 31 31 31 31 31 30 .781** .862** .644** 1 .742** .881** .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 31 31 31 31 31 30 .669** .711** .837** .742** 1 .886** .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 31 31 31 31 31 30 .888** .890** .877** .881** .886** 1 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 30 30 30 30 30 30 Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N Serius 1 Serius 2 Serius 3 Serius 4 Serius 5 Serius Total
Serius 1 Serius 2 Serius 3 Serius 4 Serius 5 Serius Total
Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). **.
Reliability Statistics
.823 6
Cronbach's
Validitas Persepsi Positif
Reliabilitas Persepsi Positif
Correlations 1 .797** .760** .614** .557** .807** .000 .000 .000 .001 .000 31 31 31 31 31 30 .797** 1 .757** .790** .622** .881** .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 31 31 31 31 31 30 .760** .757** 1 .729** .544** .815** .000 .000 .000 .002 .000 31 31 31 31 31 30 .614** .790** .729** 1 .607** .820** .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 31 31 31 31 31 30 .557** .622** .544** .607** 1 .758** .001 .000 .002 .000 .000 31 31 31 31 31 30 .807** .881** .815** .820** .758** 1 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 30 30 30 30 30 30 Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N Pos 1 Pos 2 Pos 3 Pos 4 Pos 5 Pos Total
Pos 1 Pos 2 Pos 3 Pos 4 Pos 5 Pos Total
Correlation is s ignificant at the 0.01 level (2-t ailed). **.
Reliability Statistics
.808 6
Cronbach's
Validitas Persepsi Negatif
Reliabilitas Persepsi Negatif
Correlations 1 .846** .271 .469** .426* .694** .000 .141 .008 .017 .000 31 31 31 31 31 30 .846** 1 .490** .448* .579** .818** .000 .005 .011 .001 .000 31 31 31 31 31 30 .271 .490** 1 .552** .553** .731** .141 .005 .001 .001 .000 31 31 31 31 31 30 .469** .448* .552** 1 .453* .738** .008 .011 .001 .011 .000 31 31 31 31 31 30 .426* .579** .553** .453* 1 .745** .017 .001 .001 .011 .000 31 31 31 31 31 30 .694** .818** .731** .738** .745** 1 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 30 30 30 30 30 30 Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N Neg 1 Neg 2 Neg 3 Neg 4 Neg 5 Neg Total
Neg 1 Neg 2 Neg 3 Neg 4 Neg 5 Neg Total
Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). **.
Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). *.
Reliability Statistics
.791 6
Cronbach's
Validitas Persepsi Kemampuan Diri
Reliabilitas Persepsi Keyakinan Diri
Correlations 1 .726** .624** .540** .487** .765** .000 .000 .002 .006 .000 31 31 31 31 31 30 .726** 1 .756** .794** .559** .884** .000 .000 .000 .001 .000 31 31 31 31 31 30 .624** .756** 1 .650** .529** .811** .000 .000 .000 .002 .000 31 31 31 31 31 30 .540** .794** .650** 1 .701** .859** .002 .000 .000 .000 .000 31 31 31 31 31 30 .487** .559** .529** .701** 1 .772** .006 .001 .002 .000 .000 31 31 31 31 31 30 .765** .884** .811** .859** .772** 1 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 30 30 30 30 30 30 Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N Yakin 1 Yakin 2 Yakin 3 Yakin 4 Yakin 5 Yakin Total
Yakin 1 Yakin 2 Yakin 3 Yakin 4 Yakin 5 Yakin Total
Correlation is s ignificant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). **.
Reliability Statistics
.809 6
Cronbach's
Lampiran 4
Frekuensi Tabel Pertanyaan
Dorongan PSK
Dorongan PSK 1 20 21.1 21.1 21.1 33 34.7 34.7 55.8 42 44.2 44.2 100.0 95 100.0 100.0 0 1 2 Total ValidFrequency Percent Valid P ercent
Cumulative Percent Dorongan PSK 2 58 61.1 61.1 61.1 30 31.6 31.6 92.6 7 7.4 7.4 100.0 95 100.0 100.0 0 1 2 Total Valid
Frequency Percent Valid P ercent
Cumulative Percent Dorongan PSK 3 40 42.1 42.1 42.1 45 47.4 47.4 89.5 10 10.5 10.5 100.0 95 100.0 100.0 0 1 2 Total Valid
Frequency Percent Valid P ercent
Cumulative Percent Dorongan PSK 4 77 81.1 81.1 81.1 11 11.6 11.6 92.6 7 7.4 7.4 100.0 95 100.0 100.0 0 1 2 Total Valid
Frequency Percent Valid P ercent
Cumulative Percent
Tabel Frekuensi Persepsi Keseriusan
Serius 1 12 12.6 12.6 12.6 29 30.5 30.5 43.2 12 12.6 12.6 55.8 22 23.2 23.2 78.9 20 21.1 21.1 100.0 95 100.0 100.0 1 2 3 4 5 Total ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent Serius 2 12 12.6 12.6 12.6 19 20.0 20.0 32.6 8 8.4 8.4 41.1 32 33.7 33.7 74.7 24 25.3 25.3 100.0 95 100.0 100.0 1 2 3 4 5 Total Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent Serius 3 15 15.8 15.8 15.8 39 41.1 41.1 56.8 14 14.7 14.7 71.6 13 13.7 13.7 85.3 14 14.7 14.7 100.0 95 100.0 100.0 1 2 3 4 5 Total Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Tabel Frekuensi Persepsi Positif
Serius 4 10 10.5 10.5 10.5 18 18.9 18.9 29.5 12 12.6 12.6 42.1 33 34.7 34.7 76.8 22 23.2 23.2 100.0 95 100.0 100.0 1 2 3 4 5 Total ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent Serius 5 15 15.8 15.8 15.8 27 28.4 28.4 44.2 13 13.7 13.7 57.9 22 23.2 23.2 81.1 18 18.9 18.9 100.0 95 100.0 100.0 1 2 3 4 5 Total Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent Positif 1 8 8.4 8.4 8.4 11 11.6 11.6 20.0 44 46.3 46.3 66.3 32 33.7 33.7 100.0 95 100.0 100.0 2 3 4 5 Total Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Positif 2 8 8.4 8.4 8.4 14 14.7 14.7 23.2 46 48.4 48.4 71.6 27 28.4 28.4 100.0 95 100.0 100.0 2 3 4 5 Total Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent Positif 3 6 6.3 6.3 6.3 18 18.9 18.9 25.3 48 50.5 50.5 75.8 23 24.2 24.2 100.0 95 100.0 100.0 2 3 4 5 Total Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent Positif 4 1 1.1 1.1 1.1 10 10.5 10.5 11.6 20 21.1 21.1 32.6 39 41.1 41.1 73.7 25 26.3 26.3 100.0 95 100.0 100.0 1 2 3 4 5 Total Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent Positif 5 11 11.6 11.6 11.6 32 33.7 33.7 45.3 1 2 Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Tabel Frekuensi Persepsi Negatif
Negatif 1 2 2.1 2.1 2.1 10 10.5 10.5 12.6 17 17.9 17.9 30.5 45 47.4 47.4 77.9 21 22.1 22.1 100.0 95 100.0 100.0 1 2 3 4 5 Total ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent Negatif 2 1 1.1 1.1 1.1 19 20.0 20.0 21.1 25 26.3 26.3 47.4 46 48.4 48.4 95.8 4 4.2 4.2 100.0 95 100.0 100.0 1 2 3 4 5 Total Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent Negatif 3 8 8.4 8.4 8.4 38 40.0 40.0 48.4 20 21.1 21.1 69.5 26 27.4 27.4 96.8 3 3.2 3.2 100.0 95 100.0 100.0 1 2 3 4 5 Total Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Tabel Frekuensi Persepsi Kemampuan Diri
Negatif 4 7 7.4 7.4 7.4 61 64.2 64.2 71.6 16 16.8 16.8 88.4 10 10.5 10.5 98.9 1 1.1 1.1 100.0 95 100.0 100.0 1 2 3 4 5 Total ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent Negatif 5 6 6.3 6.3 6.3 31 32.6 32.6 38.9 26 27.4 27.4 66.3 29 30.5 30.5 96.8 3 3.2 3.2 100.0 95 100.0 100.0 1 2 3 4 5 Total Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent Yakin 1 1 1.1 1.1 1.1 13 13.7 13.7 14.7 46 48.4 48.4 63.2 25 26.3 26.3 89.5 10 10.5 10.5 100.0 95 100.0 100.0 1 2 3 4 5 Total Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Yakin 2 12 12.6 12.6 12.6 28 29.5 29.5 42.1 45 47.4 47.4 89.5 10 10.5 10.5 100.0 95 100.0 100.0 2 3 4 5 Total Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent Yakin 3 14 14.7 14.7 14.7 28 29.5 29.5 44.2 37 38.9 38.9 83.2 16 16.8 16.8 100.0 95 100.0 100.0 2 3 4 5 Total Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent Yakin 4 3 3.2 3.2 3.2 22 23.2 23.2 26.3 34 35.8 35.8 62.1 28 29.5 29.5 91.6 8 8.4 8.4 100.0 95 100.0 100.0 1 2 3 4 5 Total Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent Yakin 5 10 10.5 10.5 10.5 24 25.3 25.3 35.8 27 28.4 28.4 64.2 23 24.2 24.2 88.4 11 11.6 11.6 100.0 95 100.0 100.0 1 2 3 4 5 Total Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Tabel Frekuensi Perilaku Pemakaian Kondom
Pemakaian Kondom 26 27.4 27.4 27.4 47 49.5 49.5 76.8 22 23.2 23.2 100.0 95 100.0 100.0 Tidak P ernah Kadang-kadang Selalu Total ValidFrequency Percent Valid P erc ent
Cumulative Percent
Lampiran 5
Tabel Frekuensi Variabel Kategorisasi
Umur 47 49.5 49.5 49.5 48 50.5 50.5 100.0 95 100.0 100.0 Dewas a Muda Dewas a Pertengahan Total Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent Pe ndidika n 17 17.9 17.9 17.9 54 56.8 56.8 74.7 24 25.3 25.3 100.0 95 100.0 100.0 Dasar Menengah Tinggi Total Valid
Frequency Percent Valid P erc ent
Cumulative Percent Status 22 23.2 23.2 23.2 73 76.8 76.8 100.0 95 100.0 100.0 Belum Menikah Menikah Total Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent DoronganPSK 49 51.6 51.6 51.6 46 48.4 48.4 100.0 95 100.0 100.0 Rendah Tinggi Total Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumul ative Percent
Pengetahuan 47 49.5 49.5 49.5 48 50.5 50.5 100.0 95 100.0 100.0 Rendah Tinggi Total Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent Persepsi Berisiko 67 70.5 70.5 70.5 28 29.5 29.5 100.0 95 100.0 100.0
Tidak Meras a Berisiko Merasa Berisiko Total
Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent Persepsi Keseriusan 50 52.6 52.6 52.6 45 47.4 47.4 100.0 95 100.0 100.0 Rendah Tinggi Total Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent Persepsipositif 42 44.2 44.2 44.2 53 55.8 55.8 100.0 95 100.0 100.0 Rendah Tinggi Total Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Persepsinegatif 47 49.5 49.5 49.5 48 50.5 50.5 100.0 95 100.0 100.0 Rendah Tinggi Total Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent Keyakinandiri 47 49.5 49.5 49.5 48 50.5 50.5 100.0 95 100.0 100.0 Rendah Tinggi Total Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent Pemakaian Kondom 73 76.8 76.8 76.8 22 23.2 23.2 100.0 95 100.0 100.0 Tidak Baik Baik Total Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Lampiran 6
Hasil Uji Statistik Bivariat
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
95 100.0% 0 .0% 95 100.0% 95 100.0% 0 .0% 95 100.0% 95 100.0% 0 .0% 95 100.0% 95 100.0% 0 .0% 95 100.0% 95 100.0% 0 .0% 95 100.0% 95 100.0% 0 .0% 95 100.0% 95 100.0% 0 .0% 95 100.0% 95 100.0% 0 .0% 95 100.0% 95 100.0% 0 .0% 95 100.0% 95 100.0% 0 .0% 95 100.0% Umur * Pemakaiankondom Pendidikan * Pemakaiankondom Status * Pemakaiankondom DoronganPSK * Pemakaiankondom Pengetahuan * Pemakaiankondom Persepsiberisiko * Pemakaiankondom Persepsikeseriusan * Pemakaiankondom Persepsipositif * Pemakaiankondom Persepsinegatif * Pemakaiankondom Keyakinandiri * Pemakaiankondom
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Valid Missing Total
Umur * Pemakaiankondom
Crosstab 34 13 47 72.3% 27.7% 100.0% 39 9 48 81.3% 18.8% 100.0% 73 22 95 76.8% 23.2% 100.0% Count % within Umur Count % within Umur Count % within Umur Dewas a Muda Dewas a Pertengahan Umur TotalTidak Baik Baik
Pemakaiankondom Total Chi-Square Tests 1.059b 1 .303 .618 1 .432 1.064 1 .302 .339 .216 1.048 1 .306 95 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fis her's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear As sociation N of Valid Cases Value df As ymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Computed only for a 2x2 table a.
0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10. 88. b. Risk Estimate .604 .230 1.586 .890 .712 1.113 1.475 .698 3.119 95 Odds Ratio for Umur
(Dewasa Muda / Dewas a Pertengahan) For cohort Pemakaiankondom = Tidak Baik For cohort Pemakaiankondom = Baik N of Valid Cases
Value Lower Upper
95% Confidence Interval
Pendidikan * Pemakaiankondom
Pendidikan (Dasar/Tinggi)* Pemakaiankondom
Crosstab 13 4 17 76.5% 23.5% 100.0% 43 11 54 79.6% 20.4% 100.0% 17 7 24 70.8% 29.2% 100.0% 73 22 95 76.8% 23.2% 100.0% Count % within P endidikan Count % within P endidikan Count % within P endidikan Count % within P endidikan Dasar Menengah Tinggi Pendidikan Total
Tidak B aik Baik Pemak aiankondom Total Chi-Square Tests .161b 1 .688 .002 1 .965 .163 1 .687 .736 .487 .157 1 .692 41 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fis her's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear As sociation N of Valid Cases Value df As ymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Computed only for a 2x2 table a.
1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4. 56.
b.
Risk Estimate
1.338 .322 5.564 Odds Ratio for
Pendidikan (Dasar / Tinggi)
For cohort
Value Lower Upper 95% Confidence
Pendidikan (Menengah/Tinggi) * Pemakaiankondom
Chi-Square Tests .724b 1 .395 .313 1 .576 .704 1 .401 .399 .283 .715 1 .398 78 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fis her's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear As sociation N of Valid Cases Value df As ymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)Computed only for a 2x2 table a.
0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5. 54. b. Risk Estimate 1.610 .535 4.843 1.124 .841 1.502 .698 .309 1.580 78 Odds Ratio for
Pendidikan (Menengah / Tinggi ) For cohort Pemakaiankondom = Tidak Baik For cohort Pemakaiankondom = Baik N of Valid Cases
Value Lower Upper 95% Confidence
Status * Pemakaiankondom
Crosstab 17 5 22 77.3% 22.7% 100.0% 56 17 73 76.7% 23.3% 100.0% 73 22 95 76.8% 23.2% 100.0% Count % within Status Count % within Status Count % within Status Belum Menikah Menikah Status TotalTidak Baik Baik
Pemakaiankondom Total Chi-Square Tests .003b 1 .956 .000 1 1.000 .003 1 .956 1.000 .602 .003 1 .957 95 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fis her's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear As sociation N of Valid Cases Value df As ymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Computed only for a 2x2 table a.
0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5. 09.
b.
Risk Estimate
1.032 .332 3.212
1.007 .777 1.306
Odds Ratio for Status (Belum Menikah / Menikah)
For cohort
Pemakaiankondom =
Value Lower Upper
95% Confidence Interval
DoronganPSK * Pemakaiankondom
Crosstab 44 5 49 89.8% 10.2% 100.0% 29 17 46 63.0% 37.0% 100.0% 73 22 95 76.8% 23.2% 100.0% Count % within DoronganPSK Count % within DoronganPSK Count % within DoronganPSK Rendah Tinggi DoronganPSK TotalTidak Baik Baik
Pemakaiankondom Total Chi-Square Tests 9.542b 1 .002 8.098 1 .004 9.926 1 .002 .003 .002 9.442 1 .002 95 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fis her's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear As sociation N of Valid Cases Value df As ymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Computed only for a 2x2 table a.
0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10. 65. b. Risk Estimate 5.159 1.714 15.526 1.424 1.120 1.812 .276 .111 .688 95 Odds Ratio for
DoronganPSK (Rendah / Tinggi) For cohort Pemakaiankondom = Tidak Baik For cohort Pemakaiankondom = Baik N of Valid Cases
Value Lower Upper
95% Confidence Interval
Pengetahuan * Pemakaiankondom
Crosstab 41 6 47 87.2% 12.8% 100.0% 32 16 48 66.7% 33.3% 100.0% 73 22 95 76.8% 23.2% 100.0% Count % within Pengetahuan Count % within Pengetahuan Count % within Pengetahuan Rendah Tinggi Pengetahuan TotalTidak Baik Baik
Pemakaiankondom Total Chi-Square Tests 5.645b 1 .018 4.549 1 .033 5.818 1 .016 .027 .016 5.586 1 .018 95 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fis her's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear As sociation N of Valid Cases Value df As ymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Computed only for a 2x2 table a.
0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10. 88.
b.
Risk Estimate
3.417 1.200 9.724
1.309 1.042 1.644
Odds Ratio for Pengetahuan (Rendah / Tinggi) For cohort
Pemakaiankondom = Tidak Baik
Value Lower Upper
95% Confidence Interval
Persepsiberisiko * Pemakaiankondom
Crosstab 56 11 67 83.6% 16.4% 100.0% 17 11 28 60.7% 39.3% 100.0% 73 22 95 76.8% 23.2% 100.0% Count % within Persepsiberisiko Count % within Persepsiberisiko Count % within Persepsiberisiko Tidak Meras a BerisikoMerasa Berisiko Persepsiberisiko
Total
Tidak Baik Baik
Pemakaiankondom Total Chi-Square Tests 5.803b 1 .016 4.589 1 .032 5.467 1 .019 .031 .018 5.742 1 .017 95 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fis her's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear As sociation N of Valid Cases Value df As ymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Computed only for a 2x2 table a.
0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The m inim um expected count is 6. 48. b. Risk Estimate 3.294 1.216 8.923 1.377 1.003 1.889 .418 .205 .850 95 Odds Ratio for
Persepsiberisiko (Tidak Merasa Berisiko / Merasa Berisiko) For cohort Pemakaiankondom = Tidak Baik For cohort Pemakaiankondom = Baik N of Valid Cases
Value Lower Upper
95% Confidence Interval
Persepsikeseriusan * Pemakaiankondom
Crosstab 43 7 50 86.0% 14.0% 100.0% 30 15 45 66.7% 33.3% 100.0% 73 22 95 76.8% 23.2% 100.0% Count % within Persepsikeseriusan Count % within Persepsikeseriusan Count % within Persepsikeseriusan Rendah Tinggi Persepsikeseriusan TotalTidak Baik Baik
Pemakaiankondom Total Chi-Square Tests 4.975b 1 .026 3.948 1 .047 5.041 1 .025 .031 .023 4.922 1 .027 95 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fis her's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear As sociation N of Valid Cases Value df As ymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Computed only for a 2x2 table a.
0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10. 42.
b.
Risk Estimate
3.071 1.117 8.442
Odds Ratio for Persepsikeseri usan (Rendah / Tinggi) For cohort
Value Lower Upper
95% Confidence Interval
Persepsipositif * Pemakaiankondom
Crosstab 41 1 42 97.6% 2.4% 100.0% 32 21 53 60.4% 39.6% 100.0% 73 22 95 76.8% 23.2% 100.0% Count % within Persepsipositif Count % within Persepsipositif Count % within Persepsipositif Rendah Tinggi Persepsipositif TotalTidak Baik Baik
Pemakaiankondom Total Chi-Square Tests 18.263b 1 .000 16.230 1 .000 22.198 1 .000 .000 .000 18.070 1 .000 95 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fis her's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear As sociation N of Valid Cases Value df As ymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Computed only for a 2x2 table a.
0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9. 73. b. Risk Estimate 26.906 3.434 210.825 1.617 1.293 2.021 .060 .008 .429 95 Odds Ratio for
Persepsipositif (Rendah / Tinggi) For cohort Pemakaiankondom = Tidak Baik For cohort Pemakaiankondom = Baik N of Valid Cases
Value Lower Upper
95% Confidence Interval
Persepsinegatif * Pemakaiankondom
Crosstab 35 12 47 74.5% 25.5% 100.0% 38 10 48 79.2% 20.8% 100.0% 73 22 95 76.8% 23.2% 100.0% Count % within Persepsinegatif Count % within Persepsinegatif Count % within Persepsinegatif Rendah Tinggi Persepsinegatif TotalTidak Baik Baik
Pemakaiankondom Total Chi-Square Tests .295b 1 .587 .090 1 .765 .295 1 .587 .633 .382 .292 1 .589 95 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fis her's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear As sociation N of Valid Cases Value df As ymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Computed only for a 2x2 table a.
0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10. 88.
b.
Risk Estimate
.768 .295 1.998
.941 .754 1.174
Odds Ratio for Persepsinegatif (Rendah / Tinggi) For cohort
Pemakaiankondom = Tidak Baik
Value Lower Upper
95% Confidence Interval
Keyakinandiri * Pemakaiankondom
Crosstab 44 3 47 93.6% 6.4% 100.0% 29 19 48 60.4% 39.6% 100.0% 73 22 95 76.8% 23.2% 100.0% Count % within Keyakinandiri Count % within Keyakinandiri Count % within Keyakinandiri Rendah Tinggi Keyakinandiri TotalTidak Baik Baik
Pemakaiankondom Total Chi-Square Tests 14.710b 1 .000 12.903 1 .000 16.067 1 .000 .000 .000 14.555 1 .000 95 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fis her's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear As sociation N of Valid Cases Value df As ymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Computed only for a 2x2 table a.
0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10. 88. b. Risk Estimate 9.609 2.606 35.428 1.550 1.218 1.971 .161 .051 .509 95 Odds Ratio for
Keyakinandiri (Rendah / Tinggi) For cohort Pemakaiankondom = Tidak Baik For cohort Pemakaiankondom = Baik N of Valid Cases
Value Lower Upper
95% Confidence Interval
Lampiran 7
REGRESI LOGISTIK
Case Processing Summary
95 100.0 0 .0 95 100.0 0 .0 95 100.0 Unweighted Casesa Included in Analysis Mis sing Cases Total
Selected Cases
Unselected Cas es Total
N Percent
If weight is in effect, s ee class ification table for the total number of cases.
a.
Dependent Variable Encoding 0 1 Original Value
tidak baik baik
Int ernal Value
Categorical Variables Codings
47 .000 48 1.000 47 .000 48 1.000 67 .000 28 1.000 50 .000 45 1.000 42 .000 53 1.000 49 .000 Rendah Tinggi Keyak inandiri Rendah Tinggi Pengetahuan
Tidak Merasa B eris iko Meras a Berisik o Persepsiberisik o Rendah Tinggi Persepsikeseriusan Rendah Tinggi Persepsipositif Rendah DoronganP SK Frequency (1) Parameter coding
Seleksi 1
Seleksi 2
Seleksi 3
Variables in the Equation
1.930 .702 7.563 1 .006 6.890 1.741 27.264 .730 .722 1.021 1 .312 2.075 .504 8.544 1.532 .739 4.302 1 .038 4.627 1.088 19.679 -.084 .722 .014 1 .907 .919 .223 3.785 2.784 1.135 6.019 1 .014 16.189 1.750 149.719 1.528 .834 3.355 1 .067 4.611 .899 23.656 -6.360 1.351 22.159 1 .000 .002 DorPSK(1) Tahu(1) Berisiko(1) Serius(1) Positif(1) Yakin(1) Constant Step 1a
B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper
95.0% C.I.for EXP(B)
Variable(s) entered on step 1: DorPSK, Tahu, Beris iko, Serius, Positif, Yakin. a.
Variables in the Equation
1.918 .693 7.663 1 .006 6.806 1.751 26.461 .711 .703 1.023 1 .312 2.035 .514 8.065 1.512 .718 4.433 1 .035 4.536 1.110 18.536 2.775 1.129 6.035 1 .014 16.032 1.752 146.665 1.529 .833 3.369 1 .066 4.614 .902 23.618 -6.376 1.347 22.390 1 .000 .002 DorPSK(1) Tahu(1) Berisiko(1) Positif(1) Yakin(1) Constant Step 1a
B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper
95.0% C.I.for EXP(B)
Variable(s) entered on step 1: DorPSK, Tahu, Berisiko, Positif, Yakin. a.
Variables in the Equation
2.033 .684 8.847 1 .003 7.637 2.000 29.155 1.526 .724 4.451 1 .035 4.602 1.114 19.001 2.898 1.128 6.603 1 .010 18.134 1.989 165.351 1.591 .842 3.564 1 .059 4.906 .941 25.580 -6.157 1.312 22.038 1 .000 .002 DorPSK(1) Berisiko(1) Positif(1) Yakin(1) Constant Step 1a
B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper
95.0% C.I.for EXP(B)
Variable(s) entered on step 1: DorPSK, Berisiko, Positif, Yakin. a.
Seleksi 4
Seleksi 5
Variables in the Equation
2.175 .664 10.719 1 .001 8.802 2.394 32.364 1.242 .661 3.525 1 .060 3.462 .947 12.659 3.658 1.098 11.094 1 .001 38.793 4.507 333.913 -5.674 1.235 21.105 1 .000 .003 DorPSK(1) Berisiko(1) Positif(1) Constant Step 1a
B S.E. W ald df Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper
95.0% C.I.for EXP(B)
Variable(s) entered on step 1: DorPSK, Berisiko, Positif. a.
Variables in the Equation
2.147 .637 11.356 1 .001 8.558 2.455 29.829 3.710 1.086 11.672 1 .001 40.851 4.863 343.188 -5.263 1.166 20.364 1 .000 .005 DorPSK(1) Positif(1) Constant Step 1a
B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper
95.0% C.I.for EXP(B)
Variable(s) entered on step 1: DorPSK, Positif. a.
Lampiran 8
Uji Normalitas dan NPar Test
Uji Normalitas data
NPar Tests
One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
95 95 95 95 95 95 2.64 8.45 15.61 18.47 15.14 16.63 1.989 2.938 5.553 3.578 3.120 3.617 .142 .091 .072 .121 .114 .116 .142 .082 .072 .082 .096 .116 -.092 -.091 -.070 -.121 -.114 -.094 1.388 .891 .702 1.180 1.113 1.132 .042 .405 .708 .124 .168 .154 N Mean Std. Deviation
Normal Parametersa,b
Absolute Positive Negative Most Extreme Differences Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
DorPSK Tahu Serius Positif Negatif Yakin
Test distribution is Normal. a.
Calculated from data. b. Statistics 95 95 95 95 95 95 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.64 8.45 15.61 18.47 15.14 16.63 2.00 9.00 15.00 19.00 16.00 17.00 2 8 15a 19 16 15 0 3 5 10 5 10 8 13 25 25 22 25 Valid Missing N Mean Median Mode Minimum Maximum
DorPSK Tahu Serius Positif Negatif Yakin
Multiple modes exis t. The smallest value is shown a.