E
H
T
H
G
U
O
R
H
T
D
E
T
C
E
L
F
E
R
S
A
N
E
V
A
E
H
F
O
T
P
E
C
N
O
C
S
’
M
O
B
L
A
N
I
R
O
T
A
R
R
A
N
T
H
E
F
I
V
E
P
E
O
P
L
E
Y
O
U
M
E
E
T
I
N
N
E
V
A
E
H
S I S E H T E T A U D A R G R E D N U N A
s t n e m e ri u q e R e h t f o t n e m ll if l u F l a it r a P s a d e t n e s e r P
f o e e r g e D e h t r o
f SarjanaSastra s r e tt e L h s il g n E n i
y B
N I V E K N A Y R
B PANDUU
9 7 0 4 1 2 4 9 0 : r e b m u N t n e d u t S
E M M A R G O R P Y D U T S S R E T T E L H S I L G N E
S R E T T E L H S I L G N E F O T N E M T R A P E D
S R E T T E L F O Y T L U C A F
Y T I S R E V I N U A M R A H D A T A N A S
A T R A K A Y G O Y
i
E
H
T
H
G
U
O
R
H
T
D
E
T
C
E
L
F
E
R
S
A
N
E
V
A
E
H
F
O
T
P
E
C
N
O
C
S
’
M
O
B
L
A
N
I
R
O
T
A
R
R
A
N
T
H
E
F
I
V
E
P
E
O
P
L
E
Y
O
U
M
E
E
T
I
N
N
E
V
A
E
H
S I S E H T E T A U D A R G R E D N U N A
s t n e m e ri u q e R e h t f o t n e m ll if l u F l a it r a P s a d e t n e s e r P
f o e e r g e D e h t r o
f SarjanaSastra s r e tt e L h s il g n E n i
y B
N I V E K N A Y R
B PANDUU
9 7 0 4 1 2 4 9 0 : r e b m u N t n e d u t S
E M M A R G O R P Y D U T S S R E T T E L H S I L G N E
S R E T T E L H S I L G N E F O T N E M T R A P E D
S R E T T E L F O Y T L U C A F
Y T I S R E V I N U A M R A H D A T A N A S
A T R A K A Y G O Y
v i
N A U J U T E S R E P N A A T A Y N R E P R A B M E L
S I M E D A K A N A G N I T N E P E K K U T N U H A I M L I I S A K I L B U P
: a m r a h D a t a n a S s a ti s r e v i n U i w s i s a h a m a y a s ,i n i h a w a b i d n a g n a t a d n a tr e b g n a Y
a m a
N :BRYANKEVINPANDUU a
w s i s a h a M r o m o
N :094214079
n a a k a t s u p r e P a d a p e k n a k ir e b m e m a y a s , n a u h a t e g n e p u m li n a g n a b m e g n e p i m e D
a y a s h a i m li a y r a k a m r a h D a t a n a S s a ti s r e v i n
U be jrudul:
E H T H G U O R H T D E T C E L F E R S A N E V A E H F O T P E C N O C E H T
S ’ M O B L A N I R O T A R R A
N THEFIVEPEOPLEYOUMEETI NHEAVEN
n a k ir e b m e m a y a s n a i k i m e d n a g n e D . ) a d a a li b ( n a k u lr e p i d g n a y t a k g n a r e p a tr e s e B
k u t n u k a h a m r a h D a t a n a S s a ti s r e v i n U n a a k a t s u p r e P a d a p e
k menyimpan ,
n i a l a i d e m u a t a t e n r e t n i i d a y n a l o l e g n e m , n i a l a i d e m k u t n e b m a l a d n a k h il a g n e m
n u p u a m a y a s i r a d n ij i a t n i m e m u lr e p a p n a t s i m e d a k a n a g n it n e p e k k u t n u
i a g a b e s a y a s a m a n n a k m u t n a c n e m p a t e t a m a l e s a y a s a d a p e k i tl a y o r n a k ir e b m e m
.s il u n e p
n r e p n a i k i m e
D yataani n iyangs ayabua tdengans ebenarnya. a
tr a k a y g o Y i d t a u b i D
: l a g g n a t a d a
P 1 0September2013 n
a k a t a y n e m g n a Y
v
Y T I L A N I G I R O F O T N E M E T A T S
, d e t a t s e s i w r e h t o s s e l n u , s e c n e t n e s , s e s a r h p , s a e d i ll a t a h t y fi tr e c o t s i s i h T e r
a thei deas ,phrases ,and sentence soft he t hesi swrtier .Thewrtie runderstand s s ’ e s l e y d o b e m o s k o o t e h s f i n o it a ll e c n a c e e r g e d g n i d u l c n i s e c n e u q e s n o c l l u f e h t
.s e c n e r e f e r r e p o r p t u o h ti w s e c n e t n e s r o , s e s a r h p , s a e d i
, a tr a k a y g o
Y Septembe r10 ,2013
n a y r
i v
e
i
d
o
t
e
r
e
w
u
o
y
f
i
s
a
e
v
i
L
o
t
e
r
e
w
u
o
y
f
i
s
a
n
r
a
e
L
.
w
o
r
r
o
m
o
t
.
r
e
v
e
r
o
f
e
v
il
(
M
a
h
a
t
m
a
G
a
n
d
h
i
)
.e
v
o
l
f
o
m
r
o
f
l
a
n
if
e
h
t
si
s
s
e
n
e
v
i
g
r
o
F
ii v
y
m
m
o
M
r
o
F
n
a
m
o
w
d
n
a
re
h
to
m
t
a
er
g
e
h
T
o
w
h
h s d
le
p
a
n
d
n
at
sr
e
d
n
u
s
m
y
s
ti
u
ta
oi
n
a
n
d
m
a
k
se
e
v
re
y
t
ih
n
g
e
ii i v
S T N E M E G D E L W O N K C A
, d o G k n a h t o t e k il d l u o w I , y lt s ri
F Jesu sCh irst .Thist hesi swouldneve rbe s
i H t u o h ti w e n o
d guidance and blessing . Iknow tha tH e alway sbles sme and n
e tf o I h g u o h tl a s r e y a r p y m n e t s il s y a w l
a forge tHim. Ialsowouldt ot hankt omy r
e h t o m y m y ll a i c e p s e , y li m a
f ShellyWongfo r rtusitng ,understanding ,and cairng f
o .m e
, r o s i v d a y m o t l u f e t a r g y r e v m a
I N iLuh Putu Rosiandan iS.S. ,M.Hum. , r
e h d n a e c n e it a p r e h r o
f wliilngnessi nhelpingmedoingmyundergraduatet hesi .s r
e h t u o h ti
W help , Iwould no tbe able to ifnish t hi sthesi .s And also to my co ,
r o s i v d
a Eilsa Dw iWardani ,S.S. ,M.Hum ,fo rhe rciritcism and opinion , Ican s
e i d u t s y r a r e ti l n i e g d e l w o n k e v o r p m
i .
: s d n e ir f d e v o l e b y m o t s k n a h t y n a m y a s o t e k il d l u o w o s l a
I Mega ,Yoga ,
n e y e Y , y m E , a li e h
S , I ndra ,Richard ,L iand We ,Andi ,Anto ,Uya ,Pandu ,and a ll 9
0 0 2 m o r f s d n e ir f y m f
o fo rou rfou ryear so fgrea t itme together .My specia l o
t s k n a h
t Mis sDewi ,Mis sLinda ,Mbak Yeyen ,Mbak Momon ,Topan ,Daniel , i
p i P k a b
M ,and al lBeauty and the Beas tcrew ,especially Wawan ,Aldo ,Adel , ,
e s il E e n a J k i C , i n n e
Y da n M ikefo rgivingmeal o to ffunexpeirencesi nmyl as t o
J n i r a e
y gja . Ialso would ilke to thank my brother sand siste rfo rthei rgrea t .
e m o t tr o p p u
s Iwouldalsowantt oexpres smygrattiudet omyacademicadvisor , .
S . M , ir a t s e L a i R e n i d r a n r e B . a r
D ,fo rhe rguidance and to al lmy lecturer sin .
s r a e y e s e h t s g n i h t y n a m o s e m t h g u a t o h w t n e m tr a p e D s r e tt e L h s il g n E
x i
S T N E T N O C F O E L B A T
E G A P E L T I
T ……… i
E G A P L A V O R P P
A ……….. ii
E G A P E C N A T P E C C
A ……… i ii
I S A K I L B U P N A A T A Y N R E P R A B M E
L ………. i v Y
T I L A N I G I R O F O T N E M E T A T
S ………... v
E G A P O T T O
M ………. v i E
G A P N O I T A C I D E
D ……….. v ii
S T N E M E G D E L W O N K C
A ………. v iii
S T N E T N O C F O E L B A
T ………. i x
T C A R T S B
A ……….. x i K
A R T S B
A ………. x ii :
I R E T P A H
C INTRODUCTION………. 1 .
A Backgroundoft heStudy………. 1 .
B ProblemFormulaiton……… 4 .
C Objecitve soft heStudy……… 5 .
D Deifniitono fTerms……….. 5 :
I I R E T P A H
C THEORETICALREVIEW………... 7 .
A Reviewo fRelatedStudie s……… 7 .
B Reviewo fRelatedTheo ire s………. 9 .
C Theoretica lFramework………. 1 7 :
I I I R E T P A H
C METHODOLOGY……… 1 9 .
A Objec toft heStudy……….. 1 9 .
B ApproachoftheStudy………. 2 0 .
C Methodoft heStudy……… 2 1 :
V I R E T P A H
C ANALYSIS……….. 2 3 .
A TheDescirpitono fNarrato r………..……… 2 3 .
1 ACh irsitan………...… . …. 2 4 .
2 Opitmisitc……….. 2 5 .
3 Phliosophical……..………..………..… 2 7 .
4 Beilevei nanAtfelrfie ……….………. 2 9 .
B TheDescirpitono fEddie’ sLfieExpeirencest hrought he a
N rrato r……...… ..… ………. 31 .
1 LtilteEddieKilledt heBlueMan………. 3 2 .
2 Eddieandt heSacir ifceo fEddie’ sCaptain………. 3 7 .
3 EddieandRuby,t heWfieoft heForme rOwne ro fRuby … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … r e i
P 4 1
.
4 Eddieandhi sWfie ,Marguertie………..…………. 4 7 .
x .
C TheConcep to fHeavenRevealedt hrought heNarrator’ sPercepiton s
e c n e ir e p x E e fi L s ’ e i d d E n
o ……….……… 5 4
.
1 Fris tStepo fHeaven……….. 5 6 .
2 SecondStepo fHeaven………. 6 4 :
V R E T P A H
C CONCLUSION………. 6 8 ..
. … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … n o i s u l c n o
C 6 8
Y H P A R G O I L B I
B ……….. 7 1
X I D N E P P
i x
T C A R T S B A U U D N A P N I V E K N A Y R
B .Concep to fHeaven a sRe lfected through the s
’ m o b l A n i r o t a r r a
N The Five People You Mee tin Heaven. Yogyakatra : f
o y tl u c a F , s r e tt e L h s il g n E f o t n e m tr a p e
D Letters ,Sanata Dharma Universtiy , 3
1 0 2 .
s s u c s i d s i s e h t e t a u d a r g r e d n u s i h
T e d the concep t o f heaven tha t i s n
e h t h g u o r h t d e t c e lf e
r arratori n TheFivePeopleYou Meeti n Heaven(2003 )by m
o b l A h c ti
M .There are many lfie expe irence sand lesson sprovided by the narrato rtha tare found i n t henove.l The lfie expeirences involve the majo rand
s i h c i h w s r e t c a r a h c r o n i
m essenital topresentt heconcep to fheaven accordingt o m
s i c il o h t a C n o y ll a c if i c e p s , y ti n a it s ir h C e h
t .
e z y l a n a e r a t a h t s n o it s e u q e e r h t e r a e r e h
T d in thi sstudy .Fris ti sthe
n e h t f o n o it p ir c s e
d arrator ,secondi st hedescirpiton o fEddiea soneoft hemajo r r
e t c a r a h
c tha ti sdescirbed through the narrator ,and the th rid i sthe concep to f t
a h t n e v a e
h i srevealed through the narrator’ s percepiton toward Eddie’ slfie s
e c n e ir e p x
e .
e h T . h c r a e s e r y r a r b il e h t s i y d u t s s i h t n i d e s u d o h t e m e h
T ilbraryresearch
d e s u s a
w sincet hedatat ha tneeded t o suppo trt hi sstudy wast aken f rom p irnted .s
e c r u o
s Theapproach used i nt hi sstudy i st hemora lphliosophica lapproachand ti wa sapp iledbecauset hi sstudyi ntendedt or evea laphliosophicalt hough tbased
m s i c il o h t a C n
o poin to fviewabou tconcep to fheaven. e
h t s i s i s y l a n a e h t f o t l u s e r t s ri f e h
T narrator’ sdescirpitonsi n t henove l a
e r
a Ch irsitan ,opitmisitc ,phliosophical ,and beilevesi n anatfelrfie .Thesecond s
e c n e ir e p x e e fi l s ’ e i d d E s w o h s s i s y l a n
a wtih the Blue Man ,the Captain ,Ruby , s
e r a h s e h t a h t a l a T d n a , e ti r e u g r a
M du irnghi sea trhlyl fie .T helas tanalysi sabou t n
e v a e h f o t p e c n o
c showstwo step sfrom many step so fheaven .Thefris tstep i s e
v if s e s s a p e h s r o e h , h t a e d f o t n e m o m s ’ n o s r e p a r e tf
a heavens tha tbelong to
e l p o e p e v if t n e r e f fi
d in orde rto learn lfie lesson swhich a re simliar wtih the .
e s a h p y r o t a g r u
p Thesecond step i saperson who ifnishesthef ris tstep becomes e
fi l s ’ e n o e m o s n i e l p o e p e v if e h t f o e n
o to sharelfiel essons oto .Theresearcher n
o it u b ir t n o c e h t t a h t s e d u l c n o
c fo thenarrator’ sdesc irpitons t owar d Eddie’sl fie t
u o b a a e d i n a s e t a e r c s e c n e ir e p x
e concep to fheaven .Thef rists tepgrants valuable d
n a s n o s s e l e fi
l also t hereason o faperson’sl fie .Thesecond step i sacondiiton s
e s s a p o h w n o s r e p a s e ri u q e r t a h
t thef ris tstep. eT h essencesoft heheaven area s
n o s s e l e fi l t s i s n o c t a h t s e ir o t s e fi l d n a t s r e d n u o t , n r a e l o t e c a l
p ,to know wha ta
e v o m o t d e e n t o n o d d n a d e e n n o s r e
ii x
K A R T S B A U
U D N A P N I V E K N A Y R
B .Concep to fHeaven a sRe lfected through the s
’ m o b l A n i r o t a r r a
N The Five People You Mee tin Heaven .Yogyakatra : ,
a rt s a S s a tl u k a F , s ir g g n I a rt s a S n a s u r u
J Universtia sSanataDharma ,2013. s
a h a b m e m i n i i s p ir k
S konsepsurgayangdicerminkanmelalu inarato rd i l
e v o n m a l a
d TheFivePeopleYouMeeti nHeaven(2003 )olehMtichAlbom .Ada banyak pengalaman dan pelajaran kehidupan disediakan oleh narator yang
. l e v o n m a l a d n a k u m e ti
d Pengalaman kehidupan meilbatkan karakte rutama dan g
n u k u d n e
p pen itng untuk menunjukkan konsep surga berdasarkan Kek irstenan , p
m a l a d i d a y n s u s u h
k ahamKatoilk.
h a l a d a a m a tr e P . i n i i d u t s m a l a d s i s il a n a i d n a k a g n a y h a l a s a m a g it a d A
r a n i s p ir k s e
d ator ,kedua adalah desk irps iEddie ,salah satu karakte rutama ,yang n
i u l a l e m n a k p a k g n u i
d a rrator ,dan keitgaadalahkonsep surgayang diungkapkan i
u l a l e
m perseps inaratort erhadappengalamanhidupEddie.
i d u t S . a k a t s u p i d u t s h a l a d a i n i i s p ir k s m a l a d n a k a n u g i d g n a y e d o t e M a k a t s u
p digunakankarenadatayangdibutuhkanuntukmedukungstudii n idiamb i .
s il u tr e t r e b m u s i r a
d Pendekatan yang digunakan dalam sk irps i in i adalah p
n a d l a r o m t a f a s li f n a t a k e d n e
p endekatani nid tierapkankarenastudii n ibetrujuan e
m k u t n
u ngungkap pemikrian flisafat berdasarkan pada sudu tpandang paham k
il o t a
K tentangkonseps urga. l
i s a
H anailsi spe trama adalah desk irps inarrato ryatiu seorang K irsitani , n
a d , t a f a s li f n a g n e d n a a n e k r e b , k it s i m it p
o percaya akan kehidupan setelah
m e
k a nita .Hasi ldar ianailsi skeduamenunjukkanpengalamanhidupEddieyangi a a
y n p u d i h a m a l e s i m a l
a dengan ilma orang yatiu s iManusia Briu ,sang Kapten , g
r a M , y b u
R uertie ,danTala. Anailsist erakhrit entang konsep surgamenunjukkan ir
a d n a p a h a t a u
d banyak tahapan .Tahap petrama yatiu setelah saa tkemaitan g
n a r o e s e
s ,dia akan menemu i ilma surga yang dimiilk ioleh ilmaorang berbeda n
a p u d i h e k n a r a j a l e p i g a b r e b k u t n
u ,yangdalamhali n imemiilk ikesamaandengan .
a w ij n a i c u y n e p t a p m e t e s a
f Tahap yang kedua yatiu seseorang yang telah a
m a tr e p p a h a t i t a w e l e
m menjad isalah satu dair ilma orang dalam kehidupan g
n a r
o lainuntukberbag icertiakehidupanjuga. p
m i y n e m i ti l e n e
P ulkanbahwakontirbus idesk irps inaratort erhadapkisah n
a k a t p i c n e m e i d d E p u d i h n a m a l a g n e
p sebuah i de tentang konsep surga yang a
n a m i
d langkah petrama membeirkan pelajaran hidup yang berharga dan juga h
a l a d a a u d e k h a k g n a l n a d , p u d i h a ti k a p a g n e m n a s a l
a sebuah kondis i bagi
n a k i a s e l e y n e m h a l e t g n a y g n a r o e s e
s langkah petrama .Esens idar isurga send ri i e
m k u t n u , r a j a l e b k u t n u t a p m e t h a l a d
a maham icertia kehidupan yang terdapat p
u d i h n a r a j a l e
p didalamnyayangbergunauntukmembantuseseorangmengetahui a
y a p
a ng dibutuhkan dan itdak dibutuhkan untuk beranjak ke langkah surga .
a y n t u k ir e
1 I R E T P A H C
N O I T C U D O R T N I
y d u t S e h t f o d n u o r g k c a B . A
. p i h s n o it a l e r e s o l c a e v a h e r u t a r e ti l d n a e fi l n a m u
H eL fi condiiton so reven
. e r u t a r e ti l h g u o r h t d e t c e lf e r n e tf o e r a y t e i c o s n a m u h f o s e c n e ir e p x e e fi l
a , e r o m r e h tr u
F s i t i s a mriror , lfie i s a re lfeciton o f death and vice versa. a
, r e v o e r o
M quesitonaboutt hedeathast heoppostieofl fiealway sappears when .
e fi l s ’ n a m u h o t d e t a l e r s i
ti Wha thappens a swedie? Is t here really a lfiea tfe r ?
h t a e d r e tf a e c a l p a e r e h t s I ? h t a e
d These kind o fquesiton shave existed fo r s
r a e y d n a s u o h
t in human lfie .Many sto ire sabout lfie atfe r death are o tfen .
h t a e d t n e r a p p a r o s m a e r d h g u o r h t d e c n e ir e p x
e Yet ,the interes tabou tdeath i s h
c u s s n o s a e r e m o s f o e s u a c e b t u o b a k l a t o t t l u c if fi d w o h e m o
s a sa discussion
s e r u tl u c e m o s n i o o b a t s i h t a e d t u o b
a . oF rexample ,in Brtiain o rIndia, talking s
i h t a e d t u o b
a an uncomfo trablematterbecause mostl y people want t o ilvel ong .
h g u o n
e Peoplefeelt hats incedeathi sahorirbleand badt hing,t hent alkingabout o t s a w h t a e d t u o b a k a e p s o t t a h t f e il e b e h t h ti w d e t a n i g ir o e v a h o t y l e k il s i h t a e d
. h t a e d e ti v n i
o t n o it a l e r n
I t hediscussion oflfieand death ,Ch irsitan tiy a sar eilgion ha s r
e tf A . h tr a e n o e fi l e l g n i s y l n o s a h e n o y r e v e t a h t t h g u a t y ll a c ir o t s i
h death,t herei s
t u b g n ir e f f u s o n s i e r e h T . ll e H r o n e v a e H n i r e h ti e e n o y r e v e s ti a w a e fi l l a n r e t e n a
t n a ti b a h n i e h t r o f , e li h w n a e M . n e v a e H n i y l n o y o
. e p o h y n a t u o h ti w l a n r e t
e Speciifcally ,in Cathoilc beilef ,there i sa term called e h t o t g n i o g e r o f e b h t a e d r e tf a s n i s m o r f n o it a c if ir u p f o e s a r h p a r o ’ y r o t a g r u p ‘
. n e v a e
h FatherJohn .A Hardon,SJ. .(1914-2000 )in The Doctrine o fPurgatory e
n i a l p x
e dt hegenera ldeifniitono fpurgatoryint heperspecitveofCatho ilcbeile .f r
e h t a
F Johnstatedt ha,t
e s o h t o t g n ir r e f e r e r a e w y r o t a g r u p n i t s u j e h t f o s l u o s e h t f o k a e p s e w n e h W
e r o f e r e h t e r a d n a e c a r g g n i y fi t c n a s f o e t a t s e h t n i y d o b e h t e v a e l t a h t
, e l b a r o v a f s a w t n e m g d u j r a l u c it r a p r i e h T . n e v a e h r e t n e o t t h g ir y b d e n it s e d
h tl
a oughcondiitonal :providedt heyaref ris tcleansedt oappea rbeforeGod . .
d e ll if l u f s y a w l a s i n o it i d n o c e h
T (copy irgh t 1998 : Intermiirifca – m t h . 6 0 0 _ y g o l o t a h c s E / y g o l o t a h c s E / s e v i h c r a / g r o . e c n e s e r p l a e r e h t. w w w // : p tt
h )
m o r f s e s r e v e m o
S Holy Bible : The New American Bible (1970) also e
s r e v e s o h t ,r e v e w o H . y r o t a g r u p e h t f o a e d i e h t d e n e h t g n e rt
s s canbeonlybeheld
f o s e c n e d i v e s a t o n s e c n e r e f e r s
a thepurgatory tisel.f
e b l li w t I .t i e s o l c s i d l li w y a D e h t r o f ,t h g il o t e m o c l li w h c a e f o k r o w e h t .. .
s 'e n o h c a e f o y ti l a u q e h t t s e t l li w ) fl e s ti ( e ri f e h t d n a , e ri f h ti w d e l a e v e r
t a h t , n o it a d n u o f e h t n o p u t li u b e n o e m o s t a h t s d n a t s k r o w e h t f I . k r o
w person
r e f f u s l li w e n o t a h t , p u d e n r u b s i k r o w s 'e n o e m o s f i t u B . e g a w a e v i e c e r ll i w
. e ri f h g u o r h t s a y l n o t u b , d e v a s e b l li w n o s r e p e h t ; s s o
l (1Co irnthian s3 :13
-) 1 3 1 1 : 0 7 9 1 ( ) 5 1
g n i d r a g e
R tot hequotaiton above,Catho ilcbeile fexplainst hedeathandthe d
e ll a c s i h c i h w h t a e d r e tf a e fi l f o e c n e t s i x
e ,in general, a spurgatory .Therefore , t
c e l e e h t h c i h w n i e c a l p a s i y r o t a g r u
p i on oft hehuman’ ssou lresidet emporarliy .
n e v a e h r o e s i d a r a p d e s i m o r p e h t g n i h c a e r e r o f e b
Ltierary works ,ast herelfeciton o fhuman’sl fie ,a realso t alking about l fie .
h t a e d d n
a Oneof t he i nteresitng l tierary workst alking about l fie atfe rdeath o r n
e v a e
h i sanove lenitlted TheFivePeopleYou Meeti n Heaven wirtten by Mtich .
m o b l
e i r r o
M ,i sanautho rwtihagitff ort appingsen itmenta lspot swtih amovingf ilgh t
.t u o b a l l a s a w e fi l t a h w h c a e t o t s e m o c h c i h w y s a t n a f f
o Thei deao fhi sbook ,The
e M u o Y e l p o e P e v i
F et i n Heaven ,wasi nspried fromhi sown beloved unclewho g
n i d n a t s r e d n u c i s a b s i h m i h e v a
g concep to fheaven . f
l e s ti y r o t s e h
T w asbasedonAlbomuncle’ sstory ,aboutl fieatfe rdeathand t
a h
w happeneddu irngt hedeath .Int hi scase ,Albomuitilze sanarratort or etel lhi s .s
e c n e ir e p x e e fi l s ’ e l c n
u The narrator ,the main characte rof t he story ,descirbes n
a m h c ti e B d r a w d
E ’sl fieexpe irences, whichEdward’sfuncitoni s ast heobjec to f r
o t a r r a n e h
t . nI the beginning o f the story , the narrato r deal s wtih a b ire f t
u o b a n o it p ir c s e
d Edward Betichman o rusually called a sEddie .Heworksin t he e
s u m a n a , r e i P y b u
R men tpark byagrea tgrayocean .Hehimsel fha svairou spas t m
o c e b e fi l t s a p s i H . m i h r o f s u o i c e r p y r e v e r a h c i h w s e ir o t s e fi
l e sone o f many
t n e m p o l e v e d r e t c a r a h c s i h s e c n e u lf n i h c i h w s n o s a e
r du irnghi seatrhlyl fie.
s ’ e i d d E w o h t n e m o m e h t h ti w s e u n it n o c r o t a r r a n e h
T l fie ended when he
d n u o f e H . k r a p t n e m e s u m a e h t n i e d ir a m o r f g n il l a f l ri g e lt ti l a e v a s o t d e t n a w
n e k a w a f l e s m i
h andt henr eailzedt ha thediedf romt heaccidenti nt heamusemen t d i d e h m o h w e l p o e p t n e r e f fi d e v if s t e e m e h l e v a rt s i h g n ir u d , e r o m r e h tr u F . k r a p
d n a e z i n g o c e r t o
n some o fthem were hi sown relaitves .Through the narrator , e
i d d
E learned some lfashback sof hi sunclea rpas tlfie expeirences and also n
o s s e l y n a m d e n r a e
l sf romt hese ifvepeople .Late ron,i nt heendoft henove,l the e
s o l c r o t a r r a
n s thestorywtihadescirpitont ha tEddiealsobecameoneoft he ifve lr
i g e h t t a h t e l p o e
p would mee tin heaven .The gri li sthe one he saved in the .
g n i d a e r d e h s i n if g n i v a
H The Five people You Mee tin Heaven, the w irte r t
n i o p g n it s e r e t n i e m o s d n u o
f s t o discus sand analyzein r elaiton t ot heconcep to f e
fi lr e tf
a .Throught henarrator’ sdescirpitono fEddie’ spastl fieexpeirence swhich o t s d n e t r o h t u a e h t , h t a e d s i h g n ir u d e l p o e p e v if e s e h t g n it e e m e li h w t i d e ll a c e r e h
n e v a e h f o t p e c n o c e h t d n e
s basedont heCh irsitantiypoin to fviewaboutl fiea tfe r l
a n a e h t , c if i c e p s e r o m e b o T . h t a e
d ysis’f ocusi sonthei deao fpurgatorywhichi s d
e v ir e
d from the Cathoilc beilef .Therefore ,the wrtie ri sinterested to b irng f o t p e c n o c e h t e g l u v i d o t r e d r o n i s e c n e ir e p x e e fi l e s e h t e z y l a n a d n a r e h t e g o t
. n e v a e h
n o it a l u m r o F m e l b o r P . B
o t r e d r o n
I achievebetterunderstandi fng o thi snove,l t hree problem swere .
w o ll o f s a d e t a l u m r o f
s i w o H .
1 t nhe arrato rdesc irbed in Albom’s TheFivePeopleYou Meeti n n
e v a e
H ?
w o H .
2 ist hedescirp itono fEddier evealed t hrought henarratorinAlbom’s u
o Y e l p o e P e v i F e h
T Meeti nHeaven?
h g u o r h t d e l a e v e r n e v a e h f o t p e c n o c e h t s i t a h W .
3 t nhe arrator’ spercepiton
n
o Eddie’ slfie expe irences in Albom’s The Five People You Mee tin n
e v a e
y d u t S e h t f o s e v it c e j b O . C
e h t e z y l a n a o t s m i a y d u t s s i h
T concep to fheavenbasedonCh irsitantiypoin t c
il o h t a C n o y ll a c if i c e p s , w e i v f
o beilef, which i srevealed t hrough t henarrator’ s e
h t n o n o it p e c r e
p descirpiton of Eddie’ spas tlfie expeirences a sstated in the .
s n o it a l u m r o f m e l b o r
p Tobemoredetali,t hi sstudywouldanalyzehowtheauthor n
e v a e h f o t p e c n o c e h t d e t a l u m r o
f through t he narrato rf m ro theEddie’ spast l fie s
e c n e ir e p x
e descirpiton. o t y rt l li w r e ti r w e h t ,t s ri
F analyzehowt henarrato ri sdescirbed int henovel . d
n o c e
S ly ,the wrtier tires to identfiy Eddie’ spas tlfie expe irences descirp iton .
y r o t s e h t n i h ti
w Finally,t hewrtiert irest oanalyzeand ifndt hesigni ifcanceoft he e
i d d
E ’ s p ast lfie expeirence sin estabilshing the concep to fheaven through the r
o t a r r a
n ni thes tory.
s m r e T f o n o it i n if e D . D
c r a e s e r s i h
T hu osest w termst o provideclea rexplanaiton i n ordert o avoid n
i d n a t s r e d n u s i
m g .The fo llowing explanaiton will help t he readert o geti nto t he .
n o i s s u c s i d
r o t a r r a N
n
I A Glossary o f Ltierary Terms : Sixth Ediiton (1985 : 123) , Abram s r
o t a r r a n a t a h t d e b ir c s e
d i sa person o ra character t hat t ellst he work o f ifciton a t a h t d i a s e b n a c t I . e s r e v n i e c n a m o r r o e s o r p n i y r o t s tr o h s d n a l e v o n e h t s a h c u s
s e h c e e p s r o s e n e c s e h t n e e w t e b s e g a s s a p e v it a r r a n r o e v it p ir c s e d e h t s d a e r r o t a r r a n
n e v a e H
c
A cording to Matthew F .Kohmesche rin Cathoilcism Today :A Survey o f l
o h t a
C i cBeile fandPracitce(1990 :179), heaven i sdesc irbeda sanexistenceo fa s
n o s ir a p m o c f o e t a t s a n i s i n e v a e H . h t a e d r e tf a l u o s n a m u
h w tih hel lsuch a s
e c n e s b a s ti n i s i ll e h e li h w , l a o g s ’ n a m u h s e m o c e b d n a s s e n i p p a h s t n e s e r p n e v a e h
7 R E T P A H
C I I
E R O E H
T TICALREVIEW
s e i d u t S d e t a l e R f o w e i v e R . A
e h t w e i v e r o t r e ti r w e h t r o f y r a s s e c e n s i t i , y d u t s e h t t r o p p u s o t r e d r o n I
e s e h T . y d u t s s i h t f o c i p o t e h t o t d e t a l e r e n o d n e e b e v a h t a h t s e i d u t s s u o i v e r p
e h t d e s s u c s i d y ll a c i s a b s e i d u t s d e t a l e
r same author ,work, da n focu sin relaiton .
y d u t s s i h t f o c i p o t e h t h ti w
n e v a e H n i t e e M u o Y e l p o e P e v i F e h
T i sone Mtich Albom’ sbes tselle r d
e ri p s n i s a w y r o t s s i h T . s l e v o
n byAlbom’ srea luncle ,EdwardBetichman, whose .
d e t c e ll o c e r e w s e c n e ir e p x e e fi l t s a
p There are also some ciritc swho give thei r s
’ m o b l A n o s n o i n i p
o TheFivePeopleYou Meeti n Heaven .An aritclew irttenby m
o r f g n i d l o H k c ir t a P s e m a
J Chrisitan Research Insttiute discussed the simlia r h
ti w n o i s i
v Ch irsitan poin to fview which i srelfected in The Five People You n
e v a e H n i t e e
M story ilne .Holdings tatest hat
y lt c e ri d n i a g a r e v e n s i , y l g n i s ir p r u s , e c n a r e l o t s u o i g il e r f o e m e h t s i h T
r a l u c it r a p y n a o t r e f e r y lr a e l c m o b l A s e o d r o n , k o o b e h t n i d e n o it n e m
f o e n ir t c o d t n e r e h o c a t n e s e r p o t t p m e tt a t o n s e o d m o b l A . m e t s y s s u o i g il e r
s ’ e i d d E . o t d e d n e t n i e h t a h t y l e k il n u s i t i d n a , e fi lr e tf a e h t r o n o it a v l a s
e g a s s e m y r a m ir p s ’ m o b l A r o f e l c i h e v a y l e r e m s i e l p o e p e v if h ti w g n it e e m
d e t c e n n o c r e t n i l a n o it a l e r e h t f
o nes so fal lpersons ,a t heme wtih which al l (
e e r g a d l u o w s n a it s ir h
C http://www.equip.org /aritclest/he- eif -v people- uy -o t
e e
m - ni -heaven/.) n
A aritcle on Sel fDevelopmental Stie w irtten by D rJoy Madden also s
e s s u c s i
e m o c e l p o e p l a r e v e s e fi l ri e h t f o e s r u o c e h t g n ir u d t a h t e v e il e b e l p o e p y n a M e h t e fi l t a k o o l u o y s e k a m k o o b s i h T . m e h t o t e c n e r e f fi d a e k a m d n a t i o t n i r e h t
o wayr ound .Who aret hepeoplet ha tYOUt ouchwtihou tyou actually r u o y t u o h ti w s r e h t o n o e k a m U O Y t a h t t c a p m i e h t s i t a h W ? g n i s il a e r ( ? e g d e l w o n
k http://www .bellaonilne.com/aritcles/atr54335.asp .) n o it a t o u q e v o b a e h t o t n o it a l e r n i , e r o f e r e h
T s ,i tcan be said tha tMadden a
h o s l
a s simlia ropinion wtih Holding .She generally discusse sthe lfie value s e
d i s n
i TheFivePeopleYouMeeti n Heaven ,whlieHolding discusse s tif romt he e fi l t u o b a w e i v f o t n i o p n a it s ir h C . s i s e h t e t a u d a r g r e d n u r e h n i ,i n a ir s k a F a i R y b n e tt ir w s i n o i s s u c s i d r e h t o n A d e lt it n
e Bibilca lValue sConveyed Through TheCharactersi n MtichAlbom’ sThe n e v a e H n i t e e M u o Y e l p o e P e v i
F analyzed t he relaiton between t he porrtaya lo f l b i b h ti w s r e t c a r a h c e h
t ica lvalues .Shes tatest ha,t
s e u l a v e m o s t u o b a m i h h c a e t n e v a e h n i s t e e m e i d d E t a h t e l p o e p e v if e s o h T . s e u l a v l a c il b i b d e y e v n o c e i d d E o t t h g u a t e v a h y e h t t a h t n o s s e l h c a E . e fi l n i i d d E s e h c a e t n i a t p a C e h T . e fi l n i s s e n ri a f e h t t u o b a e i d d E s e h c a e t e u l B e h T e . s s e n e v i g r o f t u o b a s e h c a e t n o s r e p d ri h t s i h s a y b u R . e c if ir c a S t u o b a . e v o l f o r e w o p e h t t u o b a e i d d E s e h c a e t n o s r e p h tr u o f e h t s a e ti r e u g r a M n e v i g e r a s n o s s e l e s o h T . e fi l f o e s o p r u p e h t t u o b a e i d d E s e h c a e t a l a T , y lt s a L il s i h t a h t e e s m i h e k a m o t e i d d E o
t fei sno tawaste .Du irng hisl fie, t here : 8 0 0 2 ( h tr o w e fi l s i h e k a m t a h t s r e h t o o t e n o d s a h e h t a h t s g n i h t y n a m e r a .) 6 4 m e h t d e z i n g o c e r e i d d E h g u o h tl a , e l p o e p e v if e s e h t w o h t u o b a d e n i a l p x e e h S t c e lf e r e h t e r a h c i h w s e u l a v e fi l t n e r e f fi d s e h c a e t ,t o n r
o ion oft hebibilca lvalue s
. fl e s ti h
a s e z y l a n a y d u t s s i h
T dfiferenttopicf romthepreviou sstudies .Thef ocu so f e
h t w o h n o s i y d u t s s i h
t narrator ,ast hemaincharacter ,perceive sandf ormulate s e b o T . y r o t s e h t n i n o it p ir c s e d s e c n e ir e p x e e fi l s ’ e i d d E m o r f n e v a e h f o t p e c n o c e h t
i a m n o i s s u c s i d e h t , c if i c e p s e r o
m nly ha s relaiton wtih the Cathoilc beile.f t
n e r e f fi d a s e s s u c s i d y d u t s s i h t , e r o f e r e h
T topicf romt hepreviou sone .s
s e i r o e h T d e t a l e R f o w e i v e R . B
o t d e d e e n e r a s e ir o e h t e m o s , y l s u o i v e r p d e t a t s s m e l b o r p e e r h t e h t r e w s n a o T
o e h t e s o h T . s i s y l a n a e h t tr o p p u
s ire saret het heoryo fnarrator, t heory o fcharacte r ,
n o it a z ir e t c a r a h c d n
a theory of concep to fatfelrfie based on the Cathoilc beile f e
r u t a r e ti l d n a y h p o s o li h p n e e w t e b p i h s n o it a l e r n o y r o e h t d n
a .
y r o e h T .
1 o fNarrator
r e g r e b r h o R o t g n i d r o c c
A and Wood s in Reading and Wriitng Abou t e
r u t a r e ti
L (1971 :23-24) ,a narrato ri sa characte rtha tthe autho rcreate sand
o s l a r o t a r r a n A . n o it a ti m il n w o s ti h ti w s y a w e m o s n i y r o t s e h t s ll e t o t s e s o o h c
n a n o it c if f o k r o w a n i w e i v f o t n i o p e h t s a d e r e d i s n o
c alysis .I trefer sto the
e h t e b n a c r o t a r r a N . d l o t s i y r o t s a h c i h w m o r f t n i o p e g a t n a v r a l u c it r a p
e h t n i n o it c a e h t e d i s t u o s i o h w r e v r e s b o n a n e v e r o r e t c a r a h c r o n i m , t s i n o g a t o r p
r o t a r r a n f o s n o i s i v i d d a o r b o w t n e e w t e b e d i c e d o t e l b a s i r o h t u a e h T . y r o t
s which
t s ri f e h t s
i -personandt hrid-person. t
s ri f e h
T -person poin to fview involve sa narrato rwho narrate sthe story t
s ri f d e ll a c y ll a u s u d n a s r e n n a m d n a e c i o v n w o s i h h ti
t s ri f e h t h ti w e v it a r r a n e h t s ti m il n o it a r r a n f o e p y
t -personnarrato rablitiyt ot alkt o .)
3 2 : 1 7 9 1 ( s r e t c a r a h c r e h t o e h t
d ri h t e h
T -person poin to fviewhast wo t ype swhich i st heomniscien tpoin t s i l a r e n e g n i w e i v f o t n i o p t n e i c s i n m o e h T . w e i v f o t n i o p d e ti m il e h t d n a w e i v f o
h t o t s s e c c a d n a n o it c a e k a t o t e e r
f e aciton sand event sand also able to give a , s d r o w r e h t o n I . s e v it o m d n a , s g n il e e f , s t h g u o h t ’ s r e t c a r a h c o t s t n e m m o c
a s a h w e i v f o t n i o p t n e i c s i n m o h ti w r o t a r r a
n tota laccesst ot hestory .Thesecond n
a s a y r o t s e h t s ll e t , w e i v f o t n i o p d e ti m il e h t , e p y
t outside rof t hestory bu tstli l n i h ti w r e t c a r a h c e l g n i s a y b t h g u o h t d n a d e c n e ir e p x e s i t a h w e d i s n i y a t s o t e l b a
.) 4 2 : 1 7 9 1 ( y r o t s e h t
n o it a z i r e t c a r a h C d n a r e t c a r a h C f o y r o e h T . 2
k o o b r i e h t n i n o s n h o J g e r G d n a p r A . R s a m o h
T Perrine’ s Ltierature :
n o it i d E h t n e T , e s n e S d n a , d n u o S , e r u t c u r t
S explained t hatt hemaincharacteri na s r o h t u a e h T . e r u t a n n a m u h e h t f o n o it a t n e s e r p d e t a c il p m o c a s i e r u t a r e ti l f o k r o w
e v i g n e tf o t u b , r e t c a r a h c a f o s c it s ir e t c a r a h c e h t l l e t y l p m i s t o n o d s e m it e m o s
t o t s e c n a h
c her eaderst oobservet hecharactert hrought hes toryilne. t
a h t d e t a t s ) 1 6 1 : 6 0 0 2 ( n o s n h o J d n a p r A
n a m u h r o f ,t o l p g n i b ir c s e d n a h t tl u c if fi d e r o m s i n o it a z ir e t c a r a h c g n i z y l a n A
n a c e n o y n A . s u o u g i b m a d n a , e l b a ir a v , x e l p m o c y l e ti n if n i s i r e t c a r a h c
e z ir a m m u
s wha t a person in a story ha s done , bu t a wrtie r need s y l g n i c n i v n o c e b ir c s e d o t s g n i e b n a m u h o t n i t h g i s n i d n a s ll i k s e l b a r e d i s n o c
o h
w apersoni .s
k o o b s i h n i , n o t n a t S t r e b o
R An I ntroduciton t oFiciton ,givest hede ifniiton n
i d e d i v i d s i h c i h w r e t c a r a h c f
s t c e p s a e m o s f o t e s e h t o t s r e f e r d n o c e s e h t d n a , ) 7 1 : 5 6 9 1 ( ” y r o t s e h t n i s r a e p p a
, s t s e r e t n i “ e r a s t c e p s a e s o h T . y r o t s e h t n i s l a u d i v i d n i e s e h t f o h c a e p u e k a m h c i h w
9 1 ( ” s e l p i c n ir p l a r o m d n a , s n o it o m e , s e ri s e
d 65 :17 .)
k o o b r i e h t n i r e t n u H d n a y t a e B o t g n i d r o c c
A New World o fLtierature ,
d e t a t s o s l a y e h T . e r u t a r e ti l n i d e y a rt r o p e r a h c i h w s l a u d i v i d n i e h t e r a s r e t c a r a h c
r o ( s ti a rt r a l u c it r a p e h t “ s i e r u t a r e ti l n i r e t c a r a h c a t a h
w characterisitcs )o fa
e g g u s n o s r e
p s t tha tperson’ scharacte r– wha t i t i s tha tmake shim o r he r ”
.) 1 3 2 : 9 8 9 1 ( e v it c n it s i d
r o y ti t n e d i n w o r i e h t e v a h e r u t a r e ti l n i s r e t c a r a h c , s d r o w r e h t o n I
n i r e h ti e s e c n e r e f fi d e v a h s r e t c a r a h c t n e r e f fi d f o h c a e e k a m h c i h w s c it s ir e t c a r a h c
, e c n a r a e p p a r i e h
t speeches ,wayoft hinking ,aciton sandeven name sgivenbyt he .r
o h t u a
d n a o t e l b a d n a t s r e d n u s r e t c a r a h c e h t s e k a m r o h t u a e h t w o h n o g n i s u c o F
k o o b s i h n i , y h p r u M . J. M , s r e d a e r e h t r o f e v il a e m o
c UnderstandingUnseen :An
d n a y r t e o P h s il g n E o t n o it c u d o r t n
I the Engilsh Nove lfo rOversea sStudenst
1 6 1 : 2 7 9 1 ( y r o t s e h t n i r e t c a r a h c a d n a t s r e d n u o t s d o h t e m e m o s s e b ir c s e
d -173 :)
s n o it p i r c s e D l a n o s r e P . a
. e c n a r a e p p a s ’ r e t c a r a h c a f o n o it p ir c s e d s li a t e d e h t s e s u r o h t u a e h T
r e h t o n A y b n e e S s a r e t c a r a h C . b
r o h t u a e h
T usest he descirpiton o facharactert hrough t heothe rcharacte’r seye s .s
h c e e p S . c
e h t t a h t o s r e t c a r a h c r e h t o n a h ti w r e t c a r a h c a f o n o it a s r e v n o c a s e s u d o h t e m s i h T
.r e t c a r a h c e h t n o t h g i s n i r o e u l c e m o s t e g o t e l b a e r a s r e d a e r
e fi L t s a P .
d
e h t n r a e l o t r e d r o n i e fi l t s a p s ’ r e t c a r a h c a e e s r e d a e r e h t s t e l r o h t u a e h T
e h t h g u o r h t , t n e m m o c t c e ri d y b e n o d e b n a c s i h T . s c it s ir e t c a r a h c s ’ r e t c a r a h c
. n o s r e p r e h t o n a f o m u i d e m h g u o r h t r o n o it a s r e v n o c , t h g u o h t s ’ n o s r e p
s r e h t O f o n o it a s r e v n o C . e
h t u a e h
T o rgive sclues t o aperson’ scharactert hrough t heconversaiton o fothe r .
m i h t u o b a y a s y e h t s g n i h t e h t d n a e l p o e p
s n o it c a e R . f
d r a w o t s t c a e r r e t c a r a h c e h t w o h h g u o r h t s c it s ir e t c a r a h c e h t s l a e v e r d o h t e m s i h T
.s t n e v e d n a s n o it a u ti s s u o ir a v
t n e m m o C t c e r i D .
g
.r e t c a r a h c s ’ n o s r e p a n o y lt c e ri d s t n e m m o c r o s e b ir c s e d r o h t u a e h T
s t h g u o h T . h
s i n o s r e p a t a h w h g u o r h t d e v i e c e r e b n a c h c i h w n o it p ir c s e d e h t s e s u d o h t e m s i h T
.t u o b a g n i k n i h t
s m s i r e n n a M . i
e h t s l a e v e r n a c s e i s a r c n y s o i d i r o , s ti b a h , s m s ir e n n a m r e t c a r a h c
A character’ s
.s c it s ir e t c a r a h c
d e n o it n e m n o it a z ir e t c a r a h c f o s y a w e n i n e h t f o e m o s y o l p m e l li w y d u t s s i h T
y l e m a n , y h p r u M . J . M y
e t c a r a h c n i a m e h t f o s c it s ir e t c a r a h c e h t g n i z y l a n a n i y r a s s e c e n e r a s y a w e s e h
T r
y r o t s e h t f o r o t a r r a n e h t s i h c i h
w fort hisr esearch.
3 .Theorie so fAfterLfieConcept( Purgatory ,HeavenandHel)l
g n i d r o c c a h t a e d r e tf a e fi l s i e r e h t , e fi l s ’ n a m u h n i h t a e d d n a e fi l n o it a l e r n I
s i h t a e d r e tf a e fi l t a h w t u o b a w o n k o t e lt ti l y r e v s i t i , r e v e w o H . y ti n a it s ir h C o t
n i x o F k r a M o t g n i d r o c c A . e k
il Reilgion , Spirtiualtiy and the Near-Death e
c n e i r e p x
E ,he describe stha twhen people die ,they wli ljourney to the othe r
d n a s e c a l p y l n e v a e h o t g n i o g , s e v it a l e r r o d n e ir f d e s a e c e d r i e h t t e e m , s d lr o w
g n i v i e c e r e r o f e b s m a e rt
s etihe rforgiving o rgenlte judgement by a loving and e
h tr u F . ) 3 1 : 3 0 0 2 ( ’t h g il f o g n i e b ‘ e n i v i
d rmore,i nr elaitont ot heatfelrfieconcep t ,
y ti n a it s ir h C n o d e s a b s i h c i h
w speci ifcallyonCathoilcism,t hef ollowingt erm so r n i g n i d n a t s r e d n u d n a y r o e h t c i s a b e h t s a d e s u e b l li w d e b ir c s e d e r a t a h t s t p e c n o c
u P e r a s m r e t e s e h T . y d u t s s i h t f o s i s y l a n a e h
t rgatory ,HeavenandHel.l
a. Purgatory
n
I TheBirth o fPurgatory (1984 :134) ,Jaquesl eGof fdescirbedpurgatory , s
i h c i h
w accordingt oAugusitne( 354 - 04 D3 A. )andGregoryt heGreat( 540- 46 0 D
.
A ) descirpiton ,a sthe “second chance” fo rthe soul swho had only “silghlty s i ti t a h t d i a s e b n a c t I . h tr a e n o e c n a n e p o d o t g n i y d e r o f e b e m it t o n d a h t a h t ” s n i s
0 2 d i m g n ir u d t a h t s n i a l p x e o s l a f f o G e l , n o it a n a l p x e r e h tr u
F th century t he
e h t e r e h w e c a l
p purgatory take splace refer sto purgaiton place which i sful lo f . e ri f t a h t s e t a t s e H ” y r a t n e m e l e “ n a t o n , e ri f ” l a ir e t a m “ a s i ti , s e it ir o h t u a e m o s o t g n i d r o c c a … e h t n i g n it s i x e e ri f a t u b , l e u f a s a s e v r e s d o o w h c i h w r o f e ri f a r o e ri f d lr o w y r a n u l b u
s tha twli ldisappea ralong wtih othe r rtanstiory t hing sa tfe r .) 6 5 1 : 4 8 9 1 ( t n e m e g d u j f o y a d e h t e h t e r e h w o t n o it a l e r n i t a h t d i a s e b n a c t i , e v o b a n o it a t o u q e h t o t g n i d r a g e R s u a c e b d e s u s i m r e t ” e ri f “ e h t , e c a l p n o it a g r u p e h t n i g n it i a w d a e d e h t f o l u o
s e fo
t a h t c it s ir e t c a r a h c s
ti only happened f o race trainpe irodo f itme .Fu trhermore, t he a n i d a e d e h t f o l u o s e h t r o f e ri f e k il s n r u b t i r o n r u b o t s e g a m i s e v i g e r e h e ri f . e m it n o it a g r u p f o d o ir e p n i a tr e c n i r e h c s e m h o K . F w e h tt a
M CathoilcismToday :A Surveyo fCatholi cBeile f e c it c a r P d n
a alsodiscusse saboutt hepurposeo fpurgatory .Hes tatest ha,t
, s g n il i a f r e h r o s i h r o f n o it a r a p e r p l l u f e d a m g n i v a h t u o h ti w s e i d e n o y n a f I n i s e w n e h t g n i h c a e t c il o h t a C n I . n o it a g r u p f o e t a t s r o e c a l p a s i y r o t a g r u p h ti w d e li c n o c e r e r a e w n e h W . t n e m h s i n u p e h t d n a t li u g e h t h t o b e v a h e w n i a m e r y ll a it r a p l li t s y a m t n e m h s i n u p e h t t u b d e v o m e r s i t li u g e h t d o G .) 8 7 1 : 0 9 9 1 ( r e h c s e m h o K o t g n i d r a g e
R ’ s desc irpiton ,purgatory exist sa sa place fo r . tl i u g s a h c u s r e tt a m y l h tr a e e h t m o r f e g r u p g n i e b r o d o G h ti w n o it a il i c n o c e
r I n
, g n ir e f f u s l a n r e t e r o t n e m h s i n u p f o d n i k r e h t o e h t h ti w d e s u f n o c e b o t t o n r e d r o p r e h t a r t u b l u o s e h t y o rt s e d t o n s e o d y r o t a g r u
b .HeavenandHell n i a e h S n h o J o t g n i d r o c c
A Wha taModern CathoilcBeileve sabou tHeaven ll
e H d n
a ,heaven i sdescirbed ast he man’ shope which i spushed t o t hei rfulles t . ) 9 8 : 2 7 9 1 ( e fi l e h t f o d n e e h t n i e v il a e m o c y l b ir r o h t a h t s r a e f ri e h t e r a l l e h e li h w s a d e r a p m o c g n i e b s y a w l a e r a s m r e t o w t e s e h t , s f e il e b c il o h t a C n i , n o it i d d a n I ti e fi lr e tf a f o s e g a t s o w t s a l l e h d n a n e v a e h s e v r e s e r p d n a s e t a e r c d o
G s el.f
t a h t s e t a t s o s l a a e h S s a w l a e m c it s ir a h c u E e h t t a h t d l e h s y a w l a s a h n o it i d a rt n a it s ir h C e r a e v o l d n a p i h s d n e ir f n a m u h e r e h W . n e v a e h f o n o it a p i c it n a , l a c i g o l o t a h c s e d n a , e n i w f o g u j , d a e r b f o f a o l “ e h t e v a h s y a w l a l li w n e v a e h , d e s i a r p y l h g i h p s a ” u o h
t ect( 1972 :88 .)
t a h t s e t a t s a e h S , n o it p ir c s e d s ’l l e h t u o b a , e r o m r e h tr u F n o d e y a l p d n a n a m n i s a w t a h w w e n k r e h c a e r p n o it a n m a d d n a l l e h ” d o o g “ A d l u o c e h l e v e l l a c i s y h p e h t n O . s r a e f l a c i g o l o h c y s p d n a l a c i s y h p s i h h t o b , s m r o w g n i y d n u f o e c a l p a e b ir c s e
d unquenching lfames ,a fou lp irson o f n o y ll u f w a l n u d e v o l o h w e s o h t e r e h w s a w l l e h y ll a c i g o l o h c y s P . t n e m r o t .) 0 9 : 2 7 9 1 ( r e h t o h c a e d e t a h h tr a e f o n o it p ir c s e d e h t d n a s n o s ir a p m o c e h t , e v o b a s n o it a t o u q e s o h t g n i d r a g e R it s ir h C a y ll a c i s a b e r a s e c a l p o w t e s o h
t an t eaching i n relaiton t o t he good deed s t s ir h C f o h t a e d e h t h g u o r h t s n i s m o r f d e e r f g n i e b f o t c a l u f e t a r g a s a n a m y b e n o d e r e h w d e n m a d e h t r o f e c a l p e h t s i l l e h , e r o m r e h tr u F . n e v a e h o t d a e l l li w h c i h w t li v e r o d a b e n o d y ll a u s u , e fi l y l h tr a e s i h n i , n a
m hing .s
e r u t a r e ti L d n a y h p o s o li h P n e e w t e b p i h s n o it a l e R e h T . 3 f o t u o n r o b e r a h c i h w a n e m o n e h p l a i c o s e r a h t o b e r u t a r e ti l d n a y h p o s o li h P a m o r f e s ir a t a h t s r e tt a m t c a rt s b a y r e v t a e rt n e tf o y e h T . s e c n e ir e p x e n a m u h m u h f o a n e m o n e h p e h t n o g n ir e d n o p e v it c e lf e
. C a h tr a M o t g n i d r o c c
A Nussbaum in Love’ s Knowledge : Essay s on e r u t a r e ti L d n a y h p o s o li h
P ,s hedesc irbedt hatt her elaitonshipbetweenphliosophy t u p d n a s k a e p s y l n i a m e r u t a r e ti l d n
a s ti sfocu son t he l fievalue so fhuman’sl fie t a h t s n i a l p x e m u a b s s u N , e s a c e n o n I . e fi l a e v il o t n a m e h t f o y a w e h t w o h d n a s a e d i e h t f o m s i c it ir c a s a n o it c n u f e v a h n a m u h f o t h g u o h t l a c i h p o s o li h p e h t w o h t a h t s e t a t s e h S . y b e v il n a m u h e h t w o h y r a r e ti
L form i sno tseparable from phliosophica lcontent ,bu tis , tisefl ,a t n e t n o c f o t r a
p – an i ntegra lpar,t t hem ,of t hesearchf o rand t hestatemen t .) 3 : 0 9 9 1 ( h t u rt f o t a h t s e t a t s e h s ,f l e s ti y h p o s o li h p d r a w o t g n i d n a t s r e d n u r e h tr u f r o F n e tf o s a h y h p o s o li h
P seen tisel fa sawayo f rtanscendingt hemerelyhuman , d n a s e it i v it c a f o t e s e k il d o g e r o m d n a w e n a g n i e b n a m u h e h t g n i v i g f o .) 3 5 : 0 9 9 1 ( s t n e m h c a tt a h ti w n r e c n o c s a h y h p o s o li h p , e v o b a s n o it a t o u q e h t o t g n i d r a g e r , e r o f e r e h T fl e s n a m u
h -understandingwhichi sconsrtuctedbyt hes ocietyo revenhumantiyi n o s l a m u a b s s u N , e r u t a r e ti l f o k r o w e h t o t n o it a l e r n i , e r o m r e h tr u F . a r e r a l u c it r a p a e fi l n a m u h o t d e t a l e r t h g u o h t l a c i h p o s o li h p e h t f o e c n a c if i n g i s e h t s e b ir c s e d l f o s k r o w a n i s e c n e ir e p x e e fi l d n a s e u l a
v tierature .Shes tatest hat
f o r e b m e m a s a y l p m i s t o n , g n i e b n a m u h a s a r e d a e r e h t o t k a e p s y e h t r o F l a r u tl u c s s o r c y lt n e u q e r f e r u t a r e ti l f o s k r o w d n a ; e r u tl u c l a c o l e m o s s a d n A . y h p o s o li h p d n a n o i g il e r f o s k r o w n a h t y li s a e e r o m r a f s e ir a d n u o b o t k a e p s y e h
t the humannes so fthei rreaders ,they immerse them in the n a m u h f o s e r u t n e v d a e h t d n a e m it n a m u h f o s t n e m e v o m c it s ir e t c a r a h c e d u ti n
if – inaf ormofl fiei nwhicht ha thappent ot hem( 1990 :391.) h p o s o li h p o t d e t a l e r y l e s o l c e r u t a r e ti l t a h t d i a s e b n a c t
I y ,both may cover
s e m e h t e m a s e h t f o e m o
s relatedt ot hehumanvalue so rhuman’ swayoft hinking . e r y a S y e r f f o e G , y d u t s s i h t f o c i p o t e h t o t d e t a l e r , c if i c e p s e r o m e b o T -n i d r o C c
w s i y h p o s o li h
p ha tspeciifcally a paritcula rperson are thinking of people when e
l p o e p e h t t a h t k n i h t n o s r e p r a l u c it r a p s i h
t have a vitrue o ra vice o rthink tha t s
i e n o d e v a h y e h t t a h
w etihe rjus to runjus tand the second par ti swhy people e
l p o e p s m r e t e h t n i k n i h
t .d o Fu trhermore ,basedonHume ,healsos tatest hat e
h
T firs tproject ,which consist sin identfiying the conten to fou rmora l d n a e c it s u j , e c i v d n a e u tr i v r o f a ir e ti r c e h t g n it a l u c it r a s e v l o v n i , t h g u o h t
a c e w y h w g n i n i a l p x e s e v l o v n i d n o c e s e h t e li h w , e c it s u j n
i me to have
t n e t n o c t a h t h ti w s t h g u o h
t (2006 :xv)
h ti w s n r e c n o c t h g u o h t l a c i h p o s o li h p r i e h t r o e fi l s ’ n a m u h t a h t d i a s e b n a c t I
n o s a e r e h t d n a t c u rt s n o c l a i c o s e h t o t n o it a l e r n i t h g ir r o g n o r w , d a b d n a d o o g e h t
. g n i k n i h t f o y a w e s o h t o t e m o c e l p o e p y h w
o
B th ltierature and phliosophy i sgenerally seen to be paritcular tha tthe s
u c o
f i soni ndividua lcase so reventsand tii sr elatedon t heuniversalin ordert o e
h t t n e s e r
p idea so rphliosophica lthought sthrough the speciifc use o fltierary s
e u q i n h c e
t .
.
C Theoreitca lFramework
s e u q e e r h t e h t g n ir e w s n a n
I iton ,s t hewrtie rwli lusethet heoryo fcharacte r f
o y r o e h t , n o it a z ir e t c a r a h c d n
a narrator ,theory ofconcep to fatfe lrfie o rheaven m
s i c il o h t a C e h t n o d e s a
b and theory on relaitonship between Ph liosophy and e
r u t a r e ti
l .
e h t t u o b a s i n o it s e u q t s ri f e h
T narrator’ sdescirpiton .Byusingt het heoryon ,
n o it a z ir e t c a r a h c d n a r e t c a r a h c d n a r o t a r r a
n thewrtieri sablet o analyzehow t he narrato ris descirbed in the story .Secondly ,the descirpiton fo Eddie’ spas tlfie
s e c n e ir e p x
n e h
t arratordescirpiton and t heothercharacter’si nteraciton wtih Eddie .For t he f
o s i s y l a n a , m e l b o r p t s a
l the signi ifcance o fEddie’ s p ast lfie expe irence sin l
b a t s
e ishing t heauthor’ sconcep to fheaven t hroughoutt hestorywli lbeusing the . e r u t a r e ti l d n a y h p o s o li h p n e e w t e b p i h s n o it a l e r e h t d n a t p e c n o c e fi lr e tf a f o y r o e h t
e r e w t a h t n o it a l u m r o f m e l b o r p n i s n o it s e u q e e r h t e h t f o s r e w s n a e h t , y ll a n i F
s u o i v e r p d e t c u d n o
c ly willl eadt oaconclusion .Theconclusionwli lshowt hatt he e
s a h p y r o t a g r u p e h t g n i d r a g e r h c i h w , n e v a e h f o t p e c n o
c basedonCathoilcism,i s
e fi l s ’ e i d d E f o n o it p ir c s e d e h t d r a w o t n o it p e c r e p s ’ r o t a r r a N e h t h g u o r h t d e t c e lf e r
it c a r e t n i s ti d n a s e c n e ir e p x
9 1
R E T P A H
C I II
L O D O H T E
M O YG
.
A Objec toft heStudy
, s l e v o n s ’ m o b l A h c ti M f o e n o e z y l a n a d n a s s u c s i d l li w y d u t s s i h
T TheFive
n e v a e H n i t e e M u o Y e l p o e
P ,a nove labou thi suncle whom he pu tas t hemajo r
g a p 8 9 1 f o s t s i s n o c l e v o n e h T . e i d d E , r e t c a r a h
c e sand divided i nto 14 chapters .
. 3 0 0 2 n i n o ir e p y H y b d e h s il b u p s a w l e v o n e h T
e n il y r o t s e h t f o n o it a r r a n g n it s e r e t n i n a s e d i v o r p r o h t u a e h t , l e v o n e h t n I
e h t s t n e s e r p e r h c i h
w lfashback fo Eddie’ s pas t lfie expeirences . The mos t
h t s i y r o t s e h t f o t r a p g n it s e r e t n
i enarrato rast hemaincharacte roft hes tory .Thus ,
e i d d E f o h t a e d e h
t become sthe beginning o fthe story o fthi snovel .Atfe rhi s
t e e m d n a e fi lr e tf a e h t o t y e n r u o j s i h s e u n it n o c e h , h t a e
d s dfiferen t ifve people .
t a h t s n r a e l e i d d E , e l p o e p e v if e s e h t m o r
F hi sea trhly lfie actually mean smany
. e fi l s i h n i m i h w o n k r e v e o h w e l p o e p e h t o t s g n i h t
e h t , y d u t s s i h t f o c i p o t e h t o t d e t a l e r , e s a c s i h t n
I rei saCathoilc’ sconcep to f
n e v a e
h ,in relaiton to the purgatory phase, which provided by the author .Thi s
e c n o
c p tcan berevealed through t henarrator’ sdescirpiton ,thedesc irpiton o fthe
e i d d
E ’ a sp stl fie expeirence sand t hemeaning o fhisj ourney i n meeitng t he ifve
h t a e d s i h r e tf a e l p o e
.
B Approachoft heStudy
d e t c e lf e r s i n e v a e h f o t p e c n o c e h t w o h s e z y l a n a r e ti r w e h t y d u t s s i h t n I e fi l t s a p s i h d n a n o it p ir c s e d s ’ r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h t f o n o it a r r a n e h t h g u o r h t , l e v o n s ’ m o b l A h c ti M n i s e c n e ir e p x
e The Five People You Mee tin Heaven .
p a o t d e d i c e d r e ti r w e h t , e r o f e r e h
T ply t heMoral-Phliosophica lapproach because
e h t f o n o it i n if e d e h t , r e t p a h c s u o i v e r p e h t n i ) 6 0 0 2 ( e m u H d i v a D o t g n i d r o c c a h c i h w g n i v il t h g ir r o y ti l a r o m f o y r o e h t e h t h ti w d e n r e c n o c s i y h p o s o li h p l a r o m t ,s u h T . y lt h g ir s e v il r u o e v il o t t h g u o e w w o h s n a e
m hef ocu soft heanalysisi st o
w e i v f o t n i o p y ti n a it s ir h C n o d e s a b n e v a e h f o t p e c n o c e h t l a e v e
r , speciifcally on
m s i c il o h t a
C , towardsl fieatfe rdeath i n which t henarrato rperceived t hrough t he
.s e c n e ir e p x e e fi l s ’ n a m u h n
I AHandbooko fCriitca lApproachest oLtierature ,Gueirns tatest hat
o t s i e r u t a r e ti l f o n o it c n u f r e g r a l e h t t a h t s i c it ir c h c u s f o n o it i s o p c i s a b e h T t e r p r e t n i d l u o w y e h T . s e u s s i l a c i h p o s o li h p e b o r p o t d n a y ti l a r o m h c a e t o t h g u o h t l a c i h p o s o li h p e h t f o t x e t n o c a n i h ti w e r u t a r e ti
l fapeirod o rgroup
) 0 6 : 1 1 0 2 ( l a r o m f o n r e c n o c y r a m ir p e h t t a h t s e il p m i e v o b a n o it a t o u q e h T -e fi l s ’ n a m u h o t n o it a l e r n i k r o w e h t f o n o it a u l a v e e h t n o s i h c a o r p p a l a c i h p o s o li h p e h t , c if i c e p s e r o m e b o T . e l p o e p o t s e u l a v n a m u h r o e fi l h c a e t o t n e v e d n a a v
e luaiton of t he work wli lmainly related t o a phliosophical t hough to rway o f
. e m it f o d o ir e p n i a tr e c a m o r f p u o r g r a l u c it r a p e h t n o d e s a b g n i k n i h t l a r o
M -Phliosophica lapproach i s t he mos tsutiable i n t hi sstudy t o analyze
n i t e e M u o Y e l p o e P e v i F e h
T Heavenbecause tii sr elatedt ot het opicandf ocu so f
c e j b o e h t , e r o f e r e h T . y r o t s e h t f o n o it p ir c s e
d itve o fthi sstudy i sto revea lthe
r o t a r r a n e h t h g u o r h t d e y e v n o c h c i h w r o h t u a e h t y b d l o h n e v a e h f o t p e c n o c
. y r o t s e
