THE EFFECT OF FISCAL POLICY ON ECONOMIC GROWTH CASE STUDY IN INDONESIA
THESIS
This is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the bachelor degree
By :
FANNY OKTIVIA DENOVIS 0910514021
Bachelor Degree of Economics Department Faculty of Economy
Andalas University Padang
This thesis has been presented in front of the examiners in the Thesis Examination and successfully passed the Thesis Examination on January 27, 2014.
The Abstract has been approved by the advisor and examiners
Signature
1. 2. 3.
FullName Dr.H.HefrizalاHandra,M.Soc.Sc Prof.H.اSjafrizal,اSE.MA Drs.اH.Masrizal,اM.Soc.Sc
Approvedاby, HeadاofاDepartmentا:ااااDr,اH.HefrizalاHandra,اM.Soc.Sc NIP.ا196510201993021001 Signature TheاAlumnusاhasاregisteredاtoاtheاfaculty/UniversityاandاhasاobtainedاTheاAlumnusاRegister Numberا: OfficerFaculty/University UniversityاAlumnusاRegistrationاNoا: NameااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااSignature FacultyاAlumnusاRegistrationاNoا: NameااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااSignature UniversityاAlumnus
RegistrationاNoا: FANNY OKTIVIA DENOVIS
FacultyاAlumnus RegistrationاNoا:
PERSONAL OF IDENTITY
a).اPlace/اDateاofاBirth:اPadangاPanjangا/ا29اoktoberا1991ااb).Parent’sاnameا:اSastramed & ا Evi ا Noveri ا c).Faculty:Economics ا d).Development:Economics ا e) ا Student ا Id ا No ا : 0910514021 ا f). ا Date ا of ا Examination: ا January, ا 27th ا 2014 ا g).Graduate ا Standard: Satisfaction ا h). ا GPA: ا 2,94 ا i). ا Length ا of ا Studyا Period ا : ا 4 ا year ا 5 ا month ا j). ا parent’s address:اNagariاPanyalaianاKec.اXاKotoاkab.اTanahاDatar
THE EFFECT OF FISCAL POLICY ON ECONOMIC GROWTH CASE STUDY : IN INDONESIA
Thesis by : Fanny Oktivia Denovis Thesis Advisor : Dr, H.Hefrizal Handra M.Soc.Sc
ABSTRACT
The ا objectives ا of ا theا research اareا to ا analyze ا the اeffect اof ا fiscal ا policyا on ا economic ا growth ا in Indonesia.اThisاresearchاappliesاOLSا(OrdinaryاLeastاSquares)اmethod.ااIndependentاvariablesاused inاthisاresearchاareاrecurrentاexpenditure,اdevelopmentاexpenditureاandاincomeاtaxاinاtheاperiodاof 2002-2012. اThisاresearchاindicatesا thatاfiscalاpolicyاinfuencesا theا economicاgrowthاinاIndonesia. The اcoefficient اof اdetermination ا (R2
) اshows ا that ا the ا variation ا of ا independent ا variables ا explains variationاofاdependentاvariableاbyا99.2اpercents.اFuthermore,اgovernmentاexpenditureا(recurrentاor development)ا andا income اtax ا have اsignificantlyا influencedا to اthe اgrowth ا in ا Indonesia. ا In ا other words, اeconomic ا growth ا of ا Indonesia ا will اbe ا more اprogressive اwith ا the ا raise ا of اgovernment expendituresاandاincomeاtax.ا
Appendixاا1.4اMulticollinearityاTest...ااا71
Appendixاا1.5اNormalityاTest...ااا73
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1.1 Background
Economicاdevelopmentاisاanاabsoluteاphaseاthatاshouldاbeاdoneاbyاeveryاnationاto
increase ا in ا income ا or ا we ا called ا economic ا growth. ا Economic ا growth ا and ا economic
development اareا almostا same ا but ا they ا are ا fundamentally ا different. ا Economic ا growth ا is
increaseاinاaverageاincomeاofاanاeconomy,اwhileاeconomicاdevelopmentاisاtheاincreaseاin
welfareاofاpeopleاofاthatاeconomy.
EconomicاGrowthااisاanاincreaseاinاaاcountry'sاrealاlevelاofاnationalاoutputاwhichاcan
be ا caused ا by ا an ا increase ا in ا the ا quality اand اquantity ا of ا resources, اanا improvement اin
technologyا orاinاanotherاwayاanاincreaseاinاtheاvalueاofاgoodsاandاservicesاproducedاby
everyاsectorاofاtheاeconomy.ا
EconomicاGrowthاcanاbeاmeasuredاbyاanاincreaseاinاaاcountry'sاGDPا(grossاdomestic
product).ا“Economicاgrowthاisاaاprocess,اnotاanاeconomicاpictureاinاaاgivenاperiod,اthereاare
developmentاorاchangesاandاuseاofاtime”ا(Boediono,ا1992).
Indonesia’s ا economic ا growth ا has ا beenا up ا and ا down ا in ا over ا recent ا decades, ا in
accordance ا with ا the ا conditions ا of ا the ا world ا economy. ا National ا income اis ا a ا measure ا of
economic ا growth, ا which ا isا showed اbyا fluctuating ا growth. ا The ا economic ا condition ا of
Indonesia ا as ا a ا developing ا country ا has ا not ا reached ا steady ا state ا conditions ا in ا which ا an
economyاisاalreadyاinاaاstableاandاlessاsusceptibleاtoاshocks.
Indonesia’sاeconomicاgrowthاisاinfluencedاbyاtheاvariousاshocks.اShocksاthatاmake
Indonesian’sاeconomyاisاdisruptedاeconomicاcrisisاofا1998,اnamelyاinflationا78ا%اandاGDP
decreased ا byا approximately ا 11 ا percent. ا In ا 2008 ا the ا world ا economyا was ا in ا recession ا or
globalاeconomicاrecession,اtriggeredاbyاfinancialاturmoilاinاtheاunitedاstates.اThisاfinancial
crisisاhitاcountriesاaroundاtheاworldاincludesاIndonesia.اTheاimpactاofاthisاcrisisاinاIndonesia
wasاmarkedاbyاtheاsideاofاstateاpending,اstateاspendingاonاstateاbudgetاallocationاinا2009
wasاestimatedاtoاincreaseاbyاRpا51,8اtrillion,اcompareاtoاtheاrealizationاofاtheاstateاbudgetاof
2008اwithاtotalاexpendituresاsetاatاRpا1,037.1اtrillionا(19.5اpercentاofاGDP),اdrivenاbyاan
increase ا in ا central ا government ا spending ا for ا Rp ا 23.74 ا trillion ا and ا the ا allocation ا of
budgetاtheاgovernmentاhasاbeenاableاtoاanticipateاtheاsituation,اsoاthatاeconomicاgrowthاin
Indonesiaاisاrelativelyاsafe,اaroundا6,38%ا(DataاBPS,ا2008).
اIndonesiaاisاbetterاequippedاtoاsurviveاinاthisاtimeاofاcrisisاbecauseاofاtheاexperience
learnedاfromاpreviousاcrisis.اAاcountryاmustاhasا aاgovernmentاthatاservesاasاaاeconomic
dampening ا and ا political ا turmoil ا both ا from ا domestic ا and ا abroad. ا Dampers ا are ا able ا to
stabilizeا the ا turmoil ا in ا the ا sense ا of ا aا more ا conducive ا situation ا through ا various ا policies.
Governmentاisاaاveryاimportantاactorاinاtheاeconomyاofاaاcountry.اAnاeconomicاactivityاwill
beاoptimalاifاthereاisاaاgovernmentاactivityاthereاin.
EconomicاgrowthاinاIndonesiaاisاstillاatاtheاdevelopmentاstage.اGovernmentاspending
onاGovernmentاactivitiesاthatاincludeاspendingاinاtheاpoliticalاsphereاasاwellاasاinاtheاfieldاof
economyاwhereاeverythingاhasاplannedاinاtheاbudgetاrevenueاandاexpenditureاofاtheاstate
budget. ا Managing ا sources ا ofا revenueا and ا governmentا spending, ا governmentا can ا makeا a
policyاtoاincreaseاeconomicاgrowthاsuchاasاFiscalاPolicy.
FiscalاPolicyاisاtheاgovernmentاpolicyاwhichاincludedا governmentاexpenditureاand
taxesاinاcollaborationاwithاtheاmonetaryاpolicyاwhoseاobjectiveاwasاtoاaccelerateاeconomic
growth. ا ا Government ا expenditure ا consists ا of ا recurrent ا expenditure ا and ا development
expenditure.
Recurrentاexpenditureاisاexpenditureاthatاusedاforاmaintenanceاandاoperationاofاa
government ا that ا includes ا spending ا on اpersonnel, ا goods ا expenditures, اinterest ا payments,
subsidiesاandاotherاroutineاexpenses.اThroughاroutine اexpenses,اtheاgovernmentاcanاcarry
out ا its ا mission ا in ا order ا to ا maintain ا the ا smooth ا implementation ا of ا the ا government, ا the
operations ا and ا maintenanceا of ا state ا assets, ا Government's ا responsibility ا to اthird ا parties,
protection ا of ا the ا poor ا and ا underprivileged ا and ا maintain ا economic ا stability
(Mangkoesoebroto,ا1994).
Development ا expenditure ا is ا expenditure ا incurred ا to ا finance ا development ا in ا the
economic, ا social, ا and ا public ا and ا that ا is ا to ا raise ا capital ا in ا the ا form ا of ا community
developmentاbothاphysicalاandاnon-physicalاinfrastructureاisاimplementedاinاaاgivenاperiod.
Theاfundsاareاallocatedاtoاtheاvariousاfieldsاinاaccordanceاwithاtheاprioritiesاthatاhaveاbeen
planned.اTheاroleاofاtheاdevelopmentاbudgetاisاmoreاemphasisاonاeffortsاtoاcreateاaاstable
andاconduciveاconditionsاforاtheاcontinuityاofاtheاprocessاofاeconomicاrecoveryاbyاproviding
aاstimulusاtoاtheاgrowthاofاtheاnationalاeconomy.اInاconnectionاwithاtheاmanagementاofاthe
overall ا state ا budget ا with ا limited ا financial ا resources ا available, ا the ا achievement ا of
developmentاgoalsاshouldاbeاasاoptimalاasاpossibleا(NotaاKeuanganاdanاAPBN,ا2004). Taxesا haveا a ا very ا important ا roleا in ا theا life ا of ا the ا state. ا Particularlyا in ا the
implementation ا of ا development ا because ا the ا taxes ا a ا source ا of ا stateا revenueا to ا fundا all
expensesاincludingاtheاexpensesاofاgovernment.اWhetherاit'sاforاrecurrentاexpendituresاand
developmentاexpenditures.
AccordingاtoاWaluyoا(2006),اhighاeconomicاgrowthاwillاincreaseاtheاrevenueاofاthe
governmentاofاtaxesا(VATاandاincomeاtax)اasاwellاasاprovidingاemploymentاandاearningsاor
savingاforeignاexchange.
Since ا the ا purpose ا ofا taxationا andا government ا expenditure,ا both ا recurrent ا and
developmentاareاtoاsupportاnationalاeconomicاactivityاinاmaintainingاtheاmomentumاofاhigh
economicاgrowth,اandاimproveاtheاwelfareاofاtheاwholeاpeopleاofاIndonesia.اThereاforeاthe
roleا ofاgovernmentا inا theاfieldاoffiscalا policyا toا accelerateا economicا growth,اtheاauthors
triedاtoاexamineااhowاtheاeffectاofاfiscalاpolicyاonاeconomicاgrowth,اinاIndonesia.Inاthisاcase
theاgovernmentاfiscalاpolicyاareاgovernmentاexpenditureاandاtaxes.
Basedاonاtheاaboveاassumptions,اFiscalاpolicyاisاaاgovernmentاpolicyاcanاimpactاof
activitiesاagainstاtheاgovernmentاinاrunningاinاtheاfieldاofاtheاeconomyاinاindonesia.ااtoاthe
authorsاareاinterestedاinاdoingاresearchاtoاtakeاtheاtitleاofا
“The Effect Of Fiscal Policy On Economic Growth : Case Study In Indonesia”.
1.2 Research Question
1. How ا does ا government اrecurrent ا expenditure ا influence ا economic ا growth ا in
Indonesia?
2. How ا does ا government ا development ا expenditure ا influence ا economic ا growth ا in
Indonesia?
3. HowاdoesاtaxesاinfluenceاeconomicاgrowthاinاIndonesia?
1.3 Research objectives
Inاaccordanceاwithاtheاaboveاproblemsاtheاpurposeاofاthisاstudyاwereاto:
1. Toاexamineاtheاeffectاofاgovernment اrecurrentاexpenditureاonاeconomicاgrowthاin
Indonesia;
2. Toاexamineاtheاeffectاofاgovernmentاdevelopmentاexpenditureاonاeconomicاgrowth
inاIndonesia;
3. ToاexamineاtheاeffectاofاtaxesاonاeconomicاgrowthاinاIndonesia.
1.4 Research Advantage
Theاadvantages ofاthisاresearchاare:
1. For ا I ا and ا myself, ا to ا improve ا my ا ability ا in ا writing ا report ا and ا doing ا research,
especiallyاinاmonetaryاeconomics,اparticularlyاfiscalاpolicy.
2. Forاgovernmentاasاinputاforاfiscalاpolicy.
3. Asاaاreferenceاforاotherاresearcherاwhoاareاinterestedاtoاstudyاinاtheاsameاfieldاwith