• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

T LING 1402730 Bibliography

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "T LING 1402730 Bibliography"

Copied!
6
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Ahmed, A. R. (2008). Reference as a Cohesive Device. Adab Al-Rafidayn , 43-67.

Aidinlou, n. A., & Pandian, A. (2011). The Impact of Local & Global Conjunctions on ESL Reading Comprehension: A syistemic perspective. Journal of Language Teaching and Research , 387-395.

Aimal, A. (2013). Skripsi: Substitusi pada Kumpulan Cerkak Tembange Wong Kangen Karya Sumono Sandy Asmoro.

Akindele, J. (2011). Cohesive Device in Selected ESL Academic Papers. African Nebula , 99-112.

Alarcon, J. B., & Morales, N. S. (2011). Grammatical Cohesion in Students' Argumentative Essay. Journal English and Literature , 114-127.

Ali, S. W. (2010). Tesis: Penanda Kohesi Gramatikal dan Leksikal dalam Cerpen "The Killers" Karya Ernest Hemingway.

Alwasilah, A. C. (2008). Pokoknya Kualitatif. Bandung: Dunia Pustaka Jaya.

Alwi, H., Dardjowidjojo, S., Lapoliwa, H., & Moeliono, A. M. (2010). Tata Bahasa Baku Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Pusat Bahasa & Balai Pustaka.

Alyousef, H. S., & Alnasser, S. M. (2015). A Study of Cohesion in International Postgraduate Business Students' Multimodala Writen Texts: An SF-MDA of a key topic in finance. The Buckingham Journal of Language and Linguistics , 56-78.

Angermeyer, P. S. (2002). Lexical Cohesion in Multilingual Conversation. The International Journal of Bilingualism , 361-393.

Ardiansyah, A. (2014). Adegan Wacana Prosa Fiksi Bahasa Sunda (Analisis Kohesi, Konjungsi, jeung Koherensi Kumpulan Carpon Kanagan jilid 1). Bandung: SPs UPI.

Ariyani, S. M. (2010). Skripsi: Wacana Glanggang Remaja Rubrik Tekno dalam Majalah Panjebar Semangat (Kajian Kohesi dan Koherensi).

Augiar, L., & Brady, S. (1991). Vocabulary Acquisition and Reading Ability. Reading and Writing; An Interdiciplinary Journal , 413-425.

(2)

Cahyono, B. Y. (1995). Kristal-Kristal Ilmu Bahasa. Surabaya: Arlingga University Press.

Chaer, A. (2007). Linguistik Umum. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Chesterman, A. (1998). Constractive Functional Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Cho, H. Y., & Shin, J.-A. (2014). Cohesive Devices in English Writing Textbooks and Korean Learners' English Writing . English Teaching , 41-59.

Cook, G. (1989). Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Coolsman. (1985). Tata Bahasa Sunda (Soendaneesche Spraakkunts). Jakarta: Djambatan.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquary and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. London: Sage Publication.

Danandjaja. (2002). Folklor Indonesia: Ilmu gosip, dongeng, dan lain-lain. Jakarta: Pustaka Utama Grafiti.

Eggins, S. (2004). An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Continuum International .

Fakuade, G., & Sharndama, E. C. (2012). A Comparative Analysis of Variations in Cohesive Devices in Professional andPopularized Legal Texts. British Journal of Arts and Social Science , 300-318.

Finegan, E. (2012). Language: Its Structure and Use. Boston: Wadswroth, Cengage Learning.

Fraenkel, J., Wallen, N., & Hyun, H. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York: Mc.Graw-Hill.

Gerot, L., & Wignell, P. (1994). Making Sense of Functional Grammar. Sydney: Gerd Stabler.

Ghasemi, M. (2013). An Investigation into the Use of Cohesive Devices in Second Language Writings. Theory and Practice in Language Studies , 1615-1623.

Ghufron, S. (2012). Piranti Kohesi dalam Wacana Tulis Siswa: Perkembangan dan Kesalahannya. Bahasadan Seni , 81-93.

(3)

Grundy, P. (2000). Doing Pragmatics. London: Arnold.

Halliday. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammmar. London: Edward Arnold Ltd.

Halliday, M. A., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

Halliday, M., & Matthiessen, C. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Hodder Arnold.

Hamed, M. (2014). Conjunctions in Argumentative Writing of Lybian Tertiary Students. English Language Teaching , 108-120.

Hananta, N., & Sukyadi, D. (2015). The Use of Cohesion in Students' Argumentative Writings. RJES , 37-65.

Heigham, J., & Croker. (2009). Qualitative Research in Applied Linguistics: A Practical Introduction. In M. Hood, Case Study (pp. 66-90). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Hessamy, G., & Hamedi, S. (121-146). A comparison of the Use ofCohesive Devices in EFL Learners' Performance on Independent vs. Integrated Writing Tasks. Study in English Language Teaching , 2013.

Heydari, S. A. (2009). An Error Analysis of Iranian EFL Learners' L2 Writing in the Application of Cohesive Devices.

Katamba, F., & Stonham, J. (2006). Morphology. Hamsphire: Palgrave Mcmillan.

Kemertelidze, N., & Manjavidze, T. (2013). Stylistic Repetition, Iis Peculiarities and Types in Modern English. Eroupean Scientific Journal , 1-8.

Keraf, G. (1988). Diksi dan Gaya Bahasa. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia.

Khotari, K. (2004). Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques. New Delhi: New Age International (P) Ltd.

Kumalasari, E. (2013). Skripsi: An Analysis of Cohesive Devices in Educational Articles of Jakarta Post Newspaper January 2011.

Kurniawati, R. (2010). Tesis: Kohesi dan Linearitas Wacana dalam Karangan Fiksi Siswa MAN Tempursari, Mantingan, Ngawi.

Kurniyati, D. D. (2012). Skripsi: Analisis Kesalahan Kohesi dan Koherensi Paragraf pada Karangan Siswa Kelas X SMA Negeri 3 Temanggung.

(4)

Laybut, B. E. (2009). Collocation and Textual Cohesion: A comparative corpus study between a genre a Written Sports Reports and a large reference corpus. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.

Mackey, A., & Gass, S. (2005). Second Language Research: Methodology and Design. New Jersy: Lawrence Elrbaum Associates, Inc.

McKay. (2007). Cohesive Features in Rembarrnga Narratives. Conference Australian Linguistic Society , 1-17.

Mohamed, A., & Maker, C. J. (2011). Creative Storytelling:Evaluating Problem Solving in Children's Invented Stories. Gifted Educational International , 327-348.

Na, Y.-H. (2011). Cohesive Devices in CMC Texts Produced by American and Korean EFL Writers. Linguistic Research , 743-771.

Nisa, H. U. (2011). Skripsi: Kohesi dan Koherensi Antar Kalimat dalam Wacana Berita Panjebar Semangat.

Nurhayati, Y. (2012). Skripsi: The Error Analysis on the Use of Cohesive Devices in English Writing Essay among the Seventh Semester Students of English Departement of STAIN Salatiga in the Academic Year of 2011/2012 .

Nystrom, S. (2003). Spoken Language Features in Internet discussion Groups.

Parera, J. (2004). Teori Semantik. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Parwati, E. (2011). Kohesi Leksikal Repetisi pada Wacana "Wayang Durangpo" dalam Surat Kabar Harian Jawa Pos Edisi Februari-April 2010. Jurnal Artikulasi , 807-816.

Prihanto, D. (2012). Skripsi: Analisis Penanda Kohesi pada Karangan Siswa Tingkat Sekolah Menengah Pertama Kelas VIII SMP Muhammadiyah 5 Surakarta.

Putri, N. W. (2016). Tesis: Analisis Struktur Teks dan Kohesi Dongeng Anak Berbahasa Inggris "Dreamlets" Karya Arleen A. Dan Eorg.

Rahman, Z. A. (2013). The Use of Cohesive Devices in Descriptive Writing by Omani Student-Teachers. SAGE Open , 1-10.

(5)

Rohmawati, I. (2012). The Realization of Cohesion in Reading Texts Used in Chicken Soup for the Soul in the Classroom. English Educational Journal , 155-161.

Rustono, & Sari, S. W. (2011). Kohesi Leksikal dan Kohesi Gramatikal dalam Karya Ilmiah Siswa SMA Sekota Semarang. Bahasa dan Sastra , 27-44.

Saeide Eissaei, A. E. (2013). Awareness of Lexical Cohesive Device in Text and Reading Comprehension. International Journal of Education Reasearch and Technology , 63-65.

Salkie, R. (1995). Text and Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.

Sari, Y. R. (2012). Skripsi: Kohesi Gramatikal dan Leksikal Feature dalam "Pesona Alam Jogja: Antologi Feature Bengkel Sastra Indonesia".

Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching Vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Simanjuntak, D. (2008). Tesis: Pemarkahan Kohesi sebagai Penyelaras Wacana.

Soedjito. (1989). Sinonim. Bandung: Sinar Baru.

Sudaryat, Y., Prawirasumantri, A., & Yudibrata, K. (2007). Tata Bahasa Sunda Kiwari . Bandung: Yrama Widya.

Sumarlam. (2008). Analisis Wacana, Teori dan Praktik. Surakarta: Pustaka Cakra.

Taboada, M. T. (2004). Building Coherence and Cohesion: Task-Oriented Dialogue in English and Spanish. Philadelphia: John Benjamin Publishing Company.

Tahsildar, M. N. (2014). Impact of Teaching Academic Text Cohesive Devices on ESL Undergraduates' Listening Comprehension. International Journal of English Language Education , 209-222.

Tangkiengsirisin, S. (2010). Promoting Cohesion in EFL Expository Writing: A Study of Graduate Students in Thailand. International Journal of Arts and Sciences , 1-34.

Wahby, M. (2014). The Effect of Implementing Cohesive Ties by Saudi Prep-Year Pre-Intermediate Students on Their Written Texts. European Scientific Journal , 220-232.

(6)

Wang, H., & Sui, D. (2004). Measuring Coherence in Chinese EFL Majors' Writing through LSA (Latent Semantic Analysis). Asian EFL Journal , 1-24.

Ward, A., & Litman, D. (2006). Cohesion and Learning in a Tutorial Spoken Dialog System. American Association for Artificial Intelligence .

Wiana, D. (2011). Analisis Kohesi pada Rubik 'Opini ' Surat Kabar Analisa. Jurnal Ilmiah Abdi Ilmu , 652-666.

Widiatmoko, W. (2015). Skripsi: Analisis Kohesi dan Koherensi Wacana Berita Rubik Nasional di Majalah Online Detik.

Wu, S. (2010). Lexical Cohesion in Oral English. Journal Language of Teaching and Research , 97-101.

Xu, R. (2000). Theme and Cohesion in the Writing of English Expository Texts by Chinese Tertiary EFL Learners.

Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Kalifornia: Sage Inc.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Perilaku kesehatan menurut Notoatmodjo (2003) adalah suatu respon seseorang (organism) terhadap stimulus atau objek yang berkaitan dengan sakit dan penyakit, sistem

Alhamdulillah, segala puji dan syukur kehadirat Allah SWT, karena atas karunia dan rahmat-Nya penulis dapat menyelesaikan skripsi yang berjudul “ Pengaruh

Jika metode mind map diterapkan pada kelompok eksperimen, maka capaian kemampuan mengingat dan memahami pada kategori proses kognitif pengetahuan mengingat dan memahami

The paper presented the photogrammetric surveying and 3D modeling of some museum artefacts with challenging texture and color, complex shape/geometry and material

Umumnya tujuan perusahaan adalah untuk mendapatkan laba yang sebesarbesarnya dari kegiatan usaha yang dilakukan, tetapi tidak jarang dalam penentuan HPP tersebut terdapat

Dalam acara kaago –ago di samping nilai –nilai relegius juga tumbu nilai gotong royong dan kebersamaan .nilai ini suda menjadi ciri khas masyarakat petani .termasuk

Siswa saling bertukar pikiran dalam kelompok untuk menemukan perbedaan reaksi eksoterm dan reaksi endoterm jika dikaitkan dengan perpindahan energinya antara

perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia melakukan transfer pricing dengan melakukan penjualan kepada pihak berelasi yang berada di Negara