• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

d ipa 0809569 bibliography

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "d ipa 0809569 bibliography"

Copied!
3
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

87

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., & Pintrinch, P. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and

Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New

York: Longman.

Aulls, M. W. & Shore, B. M. (2008). Inquiry in Education. The Conceptual

Foundations for Research as a Curricular Imperative. Volume 1. New

York: Lawrences Erlbaum Associates.

Boersma K., Goedhart, M., Jong, O. D., & Eijkelhof, H. (2005). Research and The

Quality of Science Education. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.

Buck, G. A., Latta, M. A. M. & Pelecky, D. L. L. (2007). “Learning How to Make Inquiry into Electricity and Magnetism Discernible to Middle Level Teachers”. Journal of Science Teacher Education. 18, 377 - 397.

Case, K.N., Reagen, T.G., Campbell, P. & Case, C. W. (1998). “The Role of Collaborative Inquiry and reflective Practice in Teacher Preparation”. The

Professional Educator. 21 (1), 1–16.

Chin, C. (2007). Multimodality in Teaching and Learning Science. Proceeding

The 1st International Seminar on Science Education. Science Education

Program. Bandung : Graduate Scholl Indonesia University of Education.

Chiu, M. H. & Lin, L. W. (2005). “Promoting Fourth Graders' Conceptual Change of Their Understanding of Electric Current via Multiple Analogies”. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 42, (4), 429 - 464.

Degeng, I. N. S. (1989). Ilmu Pengajaran Taksonomi Variabel. Jakarta: P2LPTK Depdikbud.

Demirci, N. & Cirkinoglu, A. (2004). “Determining Students' Pre-conception/ Misconceptions in Electricity and Magnetism”. Journal of

Turkish science education. 1, (2), 50 - 54.

Duit, R. (1991). “On the Role of Analogies and Metaphors in Learning Science”. Science Education. 75, (6), 649 - 672.

Engelhardt, P. V. & Beichner, R. J. (2004). “Students' Understanding of Direct Current Resistive Electrical Circuits”. American Journal Physics. 72, (1), 98 - 115.

Ennis, R. H. (1995). Critical Thinking. New Jersey: University of Illionis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458.

Gentner, D. (1983). “Structure-Mapping: A Theoritical Framework for Analogy”.

Cognitive Science. 7, 155 - 170.

(2)

88

Gluck, P. & Perkalskis, B. (2009). “Analog of Optical Elements for Sound Waves in Air”. The Physics Teacher. 47, (2), 75 - 79.

Guisasola, J., Almudi, J. M. & Zubimendi, J. L. (2004). “Difficulties in Learning The Introductory Magnetic Field Theory in The First Years of University”.

Science Ecucations. 88, (3), 443-464.

Haladyna, T. M. (1997). Writing Test Item to Evaluate Higher Order Thinking. Boston: Allyn and Bacon a Viacom Company.

Lawson, A. E. (1993). The Importance of Analogy: A Prelude to the Special Issue. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 30, (10), 1213-1214.

Maloney, D. P., O’Kuma, T. L., Hieggelke, C. J. & Heuvelen A. V. (2001). “Surveying Student's Conceptual Knowledge of Electricity and Magnetism”. American Journal Physics. 69, (7), 12 - 23.

Marzano, R. J. & Kendall, J. S. (2008). Designing and Assessing Educational

Objectives. Applying the New Taxonomy. California: Corwin Press.

Mukhopadhyay, S. C. (2006). “Teaching Electromagnetics at The Undergraduate Level: a Comprehensive Approach”. European Journal of

Physics. 27, 727-742.

Narjaikaew, P., Emarat, N., Arayathanakul, K. & Cowie, B. (2005). Year-1 Thai

University Students’ Conceptions of Electricity and Megnetism. Physics

Educational Network of Thailand (PENThai) and The Centre for science and Technology Education Research (CSTER).

Nasution, S. (2006). Berbagai Pendekatan dalam Proses Belajar dan Mengajar. Bandung: Bina Aksara.

Nersessian, N. J. (2008). Creating Scientific Concepts. Massachusetts: A Bradford Book The MIT Press.

NRC. (1996). National Science Education Standars. Washington: National Academy Press.

NSTA. (1998). Standards for Science Teacher preparation. NSTA in collaboration with the Association for the Education of Theachers in Science.

Oliva, J. M. (2005). “What Professional Knowledge Should we as Physics Teachers have about The Use of Analogies?”. Journal Physics Teacher

Education. 3, (1), 11 – 16.

Pask, C. (2003). “Mathematics and the Science of Analogies. American Journal of

Physics. 71, (6), 526 – 534.

Paul, R. & Elder, L. (2005). A Guide for Educators to Critical Thinking

Competency Standards. www.criticalthinking.org.

(3)

89

Podolefsky, N. S. & Finkelstein, N. D. (2006). “Use of Analogy in Learning Physics: The Role of Representation”. Physics Review Special Topics,

Physics Education Research. 2, (020101), 1 – 10.

Renzulli, J., Gentry, M & Reis, S. (2004). “A Time and Place for Authentic Learning”. Education Leadership. 62, (73-7)

Rothenstein, B. & Popescu, S. (2009). “Relativistic Velocity Addition Low from Machine Gun Analogy”. The Physics Teacher. 47, (1), 43 – 45.

Rustaman, N. Y. (2005). Perkembangan Penelitian Pembelajaran Berbasis

Inkuiri dalam Pendidikan Sains. Disampaikan pada Seminar Nasional II

Himpunan Ikatan Sarjana dan Pemerhati Pendidikan IPA Indonesia bekerjasama dengan FPMIPA Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia di Bandung pada tanggal 22-23 Juli 2005.

Rustaman, N. Y. (2010). Pengembangan Pembelajaran Sains Berbasis Kemampuan Dasar bekerja Ilmiah. Teori, Paradigma, Prinsip dan

Pendekatan Pembelajaran dalam Konteks Indonesia. Bandung: FMIPA.

UPI.

Scaife, T. M. & Heckler, A. F. (2010) “Student Understanding of The Direction of The Magnetic Force on a Charged Particle”. American Journal Physics. 78, (8), 869 – 876.

Singh, C. (2006). “Student Understending of Symmetry and Gauss’s Law of Electricity”. American Journal of Physics. 74, (10), 923 – 936.

Singh, V. (2010). “The Electron Runaround: Understanding Electric Circuits Basics Through a Classroom Activity. The Physics Teacher. 48, (5), 309 – 311.

Suseno, N., Setiawan, A. & Rustaman, N. Y. (2009). “The Importance of Mapping and Utilizing Analogies in Learning of Abstract Concepts on Electricity and Magnetism”. Proceeding of The Third International Seminar

on Science Education. 563 – 572.

Suseno, N., Setiawan, A. & Rustaman, N. Y. (2010). Penggunaan Analogi dan

Klasifikasinya dalam Perkuliahan Konsep Abstrak Listrik-Magnet di LPTK.

Disampaikan pada Seminar Nasional di P4TK Bandung pada tanggal 10 April 2010.

Suseno, N., Setiawan, A. & Rustaman, N. Y. (2010). Pembelajaran Menggunakan

Analogi dalam Perkuliahan Listrik-Magnet. Disampaikan pada Seminar

Nasional Fisika dan Pendidikan Sains di Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta pada tanggal 8 Mei 2010.

Web, M. J. (1985) “Analogies and Their Limitations”. Journal of School Science

and Mathematics. 85, (8), 645 – 650.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Adapun kekurangan yang ada pada perusahaan ini adalah terjadinya rangkap jabatan yang setiap fungsi hanya dilakukan oleh satu manajer, tidak adanya pelatihan karyawan, tidak

Dengan adanya program ini diharapkan akan mempermudah dalam melakukan perhitungan terhadap biaya yang dialokasikan, sehingga dapat mempermudah bagi para pengguna komputer

Luas wilayah Jawa Tengah pada tahun 2007 tercatat sebesar 3,25 juta hektar atau sekitar 25,04 persen dari luas Pulau Jawa (1,70 persen dari luas Indonesia).. Dibandingkan dengan

Kegiatan Pembinaan Teknis Pada Jajaran Bidang Penanganan Masalah dan Pengendalian Pertanahan Se-Provinsi Sumatera Barat.. Aula Kanwil BPN Provinsi Sumatera Barat 05

Untuk memudahkan mengamati bagian-bagian bunga yang terdiri dari tangkai bunga ( pedicellus ), dasar bunga ( receptaculum ), kelopak ( calyx ), mahkota

Jangan Plagiat.. bersifat birokrasi dan administratif, yang menyebabkan kesempatan untuk membaca, menulis, melakukan penelitian, mengikuti kajian ilmiah, pengkajian program

[r]

Konteks linguistik yang juga berupa teks atau bagian teks dan menjadi lingkungan sebuah teks dalam wacana yang sama dapat disebut konteks ekstralinguistik