• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

S ING 1105476 Bibliography

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "S ING 1105476 Bibliography"

Copied!
5
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

REFERENCES

Anderson, M., & Anderson, K. (1997). Text Types in English 1. Melbourne:

Macmillan Education Australia.

Bailey, S. (2006). Academic Writing. London: Routledge

Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the

Experimental Article in Science. Madison: The University of

Wincosin Press.

Biber, D., & B. Gray. (2003). Nominalizing the Verb Phrase in Academic Science

Writing. ACLW Chapter 5. Retrieved from

http://www.ucl.ac.uk/english-

usage/projects/verb-phrase/book/bibergray.pdf [3 December 2015]

Brownell, S. E., Price, J. V., & Steinman, L. (2013). Science Communication to

the General Public: Why We Need to Teach Undergraduate and

Graduate Students this Skill as Part of Their Formal Scientific

Training. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience

Education, 12(1), E6–E10.

Budiarti, D. (2015). A Systemic Functional Linguistic Analysis Of

Pre-Service Teachers’ Ability And Difficulties

In Writing Discussion Texts. Unpublished mini thesis. Indonesia

University of Education.

Butt, D., et al. (2000). Using Functional Grammar: An Explorer’s Guide. 2nd

Edition. Sydney: Macquarie University.

Carrol, L. A. (2002). Reharsing New Roles: How College Students Develop as

Writers. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University

Press

Christie, F., & Beverly, D. (2008). School Discourse: Learning to Write Across

(2)

Coffin., et al. (2003). Teaching Academic Writing. London: Routledge.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and

Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Boston:

Pearson

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and

Evaluating Quantitative amd Qualitative Research 4th Edition.

Boston: Pearson Education.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed

Method Approaches. California: Sage Publication

De Oliveira, L. C., & S-W Lan., (2014). Writing Science in an Upper Elementary

Classroom: A genre-based approach to teaching English Language

Learners. Journal of Second Language Writing 25 (2014) 23–

39.

Deraney, P.M. (2015). Analysis of EFL Academic Writing in a Saudi University.

School of Education. Pp. 238.

Eggins, S. (2004). An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London:

Continuum.

Emilia, E. (2005). A critical genre-based approach to teaching academic writing

in a tertiary EFL context in Indonesia. Unpublished Ph.D.

Dissertation. The University of Melbourne.

Emilia, E. (2009) Menulis Tesis dan Disertasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Emilia, E. (2011). Teaching Academic Writing: A Critical Genre-Based

Approach in an EFL Context. USA: LAP LAMBERT

Academic Publishing.

(3)

Emilia, E. (2014). Introducing Functional Grammar. Bandung: Pustaka Jaya.

Esch, C. J (2003) Degrees of Systematic Thoroughness: A Text Analysis of Student

Technical Science Writing. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. University of California.

Fang, Z. (2005). Scientific literacy: A systemic functional linguistics perspective.

Sci. Ed., 89: 335–347. doi: 10.1002/sce.20050

Fang, Z. (2006). The Language Demands of Science Reading in Middle School.

International Journal of Science Education. Vol.28, No.5, 14 April

2006, pp. 491-520. doi: 10.1080/09500690500339092

Gerot, L., & Wignel, P. (1994). Making Sense of Functional Grammar. Sydney:

Gerd Stabler.

Greeny, S., and Lidinsky, A. (2008). From Inquiry to Academic Writing: A Text

and Reader. Boston: Bedford.

Halliday, M.A.K., & J. R. Martin (1993). Writing Science: Literacy and

Discursive Power, London: Routledge.

Halliday, M. A. K (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd Edition),

London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M., & Matthiessen. C (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar

(3rd Edition), London: Arnold.

Horaric, M. (2002). ‘Something to shoot for’ in A.M. Johns, (2002). Ed. Genre in

the classroom. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum

Associates, Publishers.

Hodgson-drysdale, T. (2014) Concepts and language: Developing knowledge in

science. Linguistics and Science Vol.27 54-67.

(4)

Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A (1987). English for Specific Purposes. Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press.

Irvin, L. L. (2010) What is academic writing? Advance online publication.

Retreived from http://www.parlorpress.com/pdf/irvin--what-

is-academic-writing.pdf [7 October 2015]

John, A. M. (2002) Genre in the Classroom: Multiple perspectives. London:

Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

Knapp, P., & Watkins, M. (2009). Genre, Text, Grammar: Technologies for

teaching and assessing writing. Sidney: University of New South

Wales Press.

Lemke, J. L. (2010) Talking Science: Language, Learning, and Values. New

Jersey: Alex Publishing Coorporation.

Lloyd, M. (2007). Developing academic writing skills: The PROCESS framework.

Nursing Standard, 21(40), 50-6. Retrieved from

http://search.proquest.com/docview/219844271?accountid=25704 [

Macken-Horarik, M. (2002). Something to shoot for. In A. M. Johns (2002). (Ed)

Genre in the classroom. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum

Associates, Publishers.

Martin, J. R. (1993). Technicality and Abstraction: Language for the Creation of

Specialized Texts, in Martin & Halliday, (1993). Writing Science:

Literacy and Discursive Power. London: Routledge

Martin, J. R., & Veel, R. (1998). Reading science: Critical and functional

perspectives on discourses of science. New York: Routledge.

Martin, J. R. (2006). Genre and Language Learning: A Social Semiotic

(5)

Martin, J. R. & Rose, D. (2007). Genre Relations. Mapping Culture. London:

Equinox.

Martin, J. R. (2013). Embedded Literacy: Knowledge as Meaning. Linguistics

and Education 24 (1): 23–37.

O’Hallaron, C. L., et al. (2015) Reading science: Using systemic functional

linguistics to support critical language awareness. Linguistics

and Education , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2015.02.002

Reynolds, J. A., et al. (2012). Writing-to-Learn in Undergraduate Science

Education: A Community- Based, Conceptually Driven Approach.

CBE Life Sciences Education, 11(1), 17–25.

http://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.11-08-0064

Swales, J. & Christine, F. (2004). Academic Writing for Graduate Students:

Essential tasks and skills (Second Edition. Ann Arbor: University

of Michigan Press

Thompson, G. (2004) Introducting Functional Grammar (2nd Edition), London:

Hodder Education

Tuan, L. T. (2010). Enhancing EFL learners' writing skill via journal writing.

English Language Teaching, 3(3), 81-88. Retrieved from

http://search.proquest.com/docview/839109807?accountid=25704

[7 October 2015]

Wright, L. J. (2008). Writing science and objectification: Selecting, organizing,

and deconstextualing knowledge. Linguistic and Education 19. pp.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Berdasarkan penelitian tindakan kelas yang telah dilakukan peneliti dengan judul “ Peningkatan Sikap Peduli Sosial Siswa Terhadap Korban Bencana Melalui Penggunaan

UPAYA MENINGKATKAN HASIL BELAJAR SENAM LANTAI MELALUI PENERAPAN ALAT BANTU ROL BELAKANG DI SMP NEGERI 3 LEMBANG.. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu |

Analisis Hasil Pelaksanaan Penelitian Tndakan Kelas dalam Menerakan Metode Proyek untuk Meningkatkan Tanggung Jawab Siswa dalam Pembelajaran IPS ...190.. Perencanaan yang

Awalnya AFTA ditargetkan ASEAN sebagai wujud dari kesepakatan dari negara-negara ASEAN untuk membentuk suatu kawasan bebas perdagangan dalam rangka meningkatkan daya saing

PENGGUNAAN MEDIA FILM DOKUMENTER UNTUK MENINGKATKAN BERPIKIR ANALISIS SISWA DALAM PEMBELAJARAN IPS: (Penelitian Tindakan Kelas di SMP Negeri 9 Kota Bandung kelas VIII-6)..

• No ponto 10 indique o montante total de impostos sobre os rendimentos pagos à Direcção Nacional dos Impostos de Timor-Leste durante o ano 2007. • No ponto 20 indique o

Hasil penelitian tentang kata tugas dalam cerita rakyat Panglima Bukit Cermin. dan Panglima Nayan ini diharapkan dapat memberikan manfaat dalam

• is used wholly or partly in the conduct of taxable business activities. Intangible assets must be amortised on a straight-line basis. The amortization rate is 100%. Therefore, you