47
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
1. Vahid NA, Mahjunath MK. Comparation of fracture resistance of maxillary
first premolars with class II mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) cavities restored
with newer resin based composites-an ex vivo study. Int J Current Research
2016; 8(04): 29814-20.
2. Ferracane JL. Resin composite-State of the art. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 29-38.
3. Valian A, Moravej S, Geramy A, Faramarzi E. Effect of extension and type of
composite-restored class II cavities on biomehanical properties of teeth : a
three dimensional finite element analysis. J Dent 2015; 12(2): 140-9.
4. Frater M, Foster A, Kereszturi M dkk. In Vitro fracture resistance of molar
teeth restored with a short fibre-reinforced composit material. J Dent 2014:
1143-50.
5. Moosavi H, Zeynali M, Pour ZH. Fracture resistance of premolars
restored by various types and placement techniques of resin composites. Int J
Dent 2012: 1,
6. Patel P, Shah M, Agrawal N, Desai P, Tailor K, Patel K. Comparative
evaluation of microleakage of class II cavities restored with different bulk fill
composite restorative system: An in vitro study. J Res Adv Dent 2016; 5(2):
52-62.
7. Baig M. M et al. Microleakage evaluation in restorations using different resin
composite insertion techniques and liners in preparations with high c-factor –
An in vitro study.King Saud University J Dental Science 2013; 4: 57-64.
8. Mansour K, Sada A, Sinan H. Curing depth of bulk fill composite an in vitro
study. Pak Oral & Dent J 2015; 35(2): 270-5.
9. Kapoor N, Bahuguna N, Anand S. Influence of composite insertion technique
on gap formation. J Conserv Dent 2016; 19(1): 77-81.
10. Ahmad I. Deep resins, while fillings: A new techniwue for composite
restorations. Cosmetic Dent 2013
48
11. Orlowski M et al. Evaluation of marginal integrity of four bulk-fill dental
composite materials: in vitro study. The Scientific World J 2015: 1-8.
12. Abouelleil H et all. Comparison of mechanical properties of a nem fiber
reinforced composite and bulk filling composite. Research Article.
Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics 2015: 1-8.
13. EverX PosteriorTM from GC fibre-reinforced composite for dentin replacement in large cavities. 2013;3-10.
14. Garoushi SK, Hatem M, Lassila LVJ, Vallittu PK.The effect of short fiber
composite base in microleakage and load-bearing capacity of posterior
restorations. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand 2015; 1(1): 6-12.
15. Anusavice , Shen , Rawls. Philip's science of dental materials. 12 th ed:
Elsevier ., 2012: 277-80, 287.
16. Irawan B. Karakteristik komposit resin berkemampuan mengalir.I J Dent
2015; 12(1) : 36-41.
17. Sakaguchi RL, Powers JM. Craig’s restorative dental materials. 13th ed., Philadelphia: Elsevier., 2012: 36, 100, 164-7, 172-9,181, 332.
18. Garoushi S dkk. Physical properties and depth of cure of a new short fiber
reinforced composite. Dental Materials 2013; 29: 835-41.
19. Heymann HO, Swift EJ, Ritter AV. Studevant‟s art and science of
operative dentistry. 6 th ed., Singapore: Elsevier Inc., 2012: 218-22.
20. Nurhapsari A. Perbandingan kebocoran tepi antara restorasi resi komposit
tipe bulk-fill dan tipe packable dengan penggunaan system adhesive total
etch dan self etch. Odonto Dent J 2016; Vol 3(1): 8-13.
21. Garg A, Garg N. Texbook of operative dentistry. 1st ed., New Delhi: Jaype
Brothers., 2010: 3, 84, 125, 147, 240, 250, 257- 61.
22. FiltekTM Bulk-fill Posterior Restorative Technical Product Profile. 23. A dental outlook report. Bulk-fill resin composite update. 2013; 41: 1-6.
24. EverX PosteriorTM from GC fibre-reinforced composite for dentin replacement in large cavities. 2013;3-10.
49
25.Chan DCN, Gianni M, Degoes MF. Profisional anterior tooth replacement
using nonimpregnated fiber and fiber reinforced composite resin materials :
A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 95: 344-8.
26.Van Heumen, , van Dijken, J.W.V., Tanner, J., Pikaar, R., Lassila, L.V.J.,
Creugers, N.H.J., Vallittu, P.K. & Kreulen, C.M. 2009. Five-year survival
of 3-unit fiber-reinforced composite fixed partial dentures in the anterior
area.Dental Materials 25: 820-827.
27.Kerr. A proven One Step procedure, now better than ever
http://www.kerrdental.eu/FillingMaterials/Composites/BulkFillComposites/
SonicFill.Diakses pada tanggal 4 maret 2015
28.EverX Posterior the stongest composite sub-structure.
29.Fahad F, Majeed MAR. Fracture resistance of weekened premolars restored
with sonically-activated composite, bulk-filed and incerementally-filled
compositd (a comparative in vitro study). J Bagh College Dentistry 2014;
Vol. 26(4): 22-7.
30.Ibarra ET, Lien W, Casey J dkk. Physical properties of a new sonically
placed composit resin restorative material. J General Dent 2015: 51-6.
31.Hambire UV, Tripathi VK. Experimental Evaluation Of Different Fillers In
Dental Composites In Terms Of Mechanical Properties. J Eng & Appl Sci
2012; 7: 147-51.
32.Pereira JR ,Mc Donald A, BDentSc, Petrie A, Knowles JC. Effect of cavity
design on tooth surface strain. J Prosthet Dent 2013;110:369-375.
33.Noronha FD, Scelza MFZ, Silva LE, Carvalho WR. Evaluation of
compressivestrength in the first premolars between young and elderly
people: ex vivo study.Gerodontology 2011; e898-e901.
34.Franca FMG, Worschech CC, Paulillo LAMS, Martins LRM, Lovadino
JR.Fracture Resistance of Premolar Teeth Restored With Different Filling
Techniques. J Contemp Dent Pract 2005; 6: 1-7.
50
35.Makramani A, Razak A, Yi NM, Ying SY, Sanabani A. Effect of restorative
techniques on fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars. J
Stomatol 2013; 3: 379-85
36.Abed YA, Sabry HA, Alrobeigy NA.Degree of conversion and surface
hardness of bulk-fill composite versus incremental-fill composite. Tanta
Dent J 2015; 12: 71-80
37. Woelfel BJ, Scheid RC. Dental anatomy : It’s relevance to Dentistry. 6 th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.,2001: 81-2.
