• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

S ING 0906444 Bibliography

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "S ING 0906444 Bibliography"

Copied!
7
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

REFERENCES

Ahlsen, E. (2007).Teaching Writing in Theory and Practice(Doctoral

dissertation, Institute of Education).

Ahlsèn, E., Lundh, N. (2007). Teaching Writing in Theory and Practice (A Study

of Ways of Working with Writing in the 9th Grade).A degree project for

Advanced course in English with Educational Aplication. Retrieved from:

http://www.diva-portal.se/smash/get/diva2:199311/FULLTEXT01.pdf

[May 20, 2014]

Al-Ahmad, S., Al-Jarrah, R. S., & Al-Jarrah, R. (2015). The Impact of Direct Corrective Feedback Type on the Linguistic Accuracy of EFL Students’ Writing. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly June 2015 Volume 17 Issue 2, 8.

Alawi, F. F. (2011). Improving students ability in writing descriptive text using

clustering technique.

Alwasilah, A. C., & Alwasilah, S. S. (2005). Pokoknya menulis.Bandung: Kiblat.

Anderson, M., Anderson, K. (1998).Text Type in English 2. Australia:

MacMillan.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2002). ProsedurPenelitian: SuatuPendekatanPraktek (fifth

edition). Jakarta: PT. RinekaCipta

Badger, R., & White, G. (2000). A process genre approach to teaching

writing.ELT journal, 54(2), 153-160.

Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback.Journal

of second language writing, 17(2), 102-118.

Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2008). The value of written corrective feedback for

migrant and international students. Language teaching research, 12(3),

409-431.

Brown, H. Douglas. (2001). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to

(2)

Buyukyavuz, O., & Cakir, I. (2014). Uncovering the Motivating Factors Behind

Writing in English in an EFL Context.Anthropologist,18(1), 153-163.

Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for

improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of

second language writing, 12(3), 267-296.

Chang, N. (2012). Pre-Service Teachers' Views: How Did E-feedback through

Assessment Facilitate Their Learning?.Journal of the Scholarship of

Teaching and Learning,11(2), 16-33.

Chang, N., Watson, A. B., Bakerson, M. A., Williams, E. E., McGoron, F. X., &

Spitzer, B. (2012). Electronic feedback or handwritten feedback: What do

undergraduate students prefer and why?.Journal of Teaching and Learning

with Technology,1(1), 1-23.

Cresswell, J. W. (2008). Educational Research-Planning, Conducting, and

Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research 3rd Edition. New Jersey:

Pearson.

Elashri, E. A. E., & Ibrahim, I. (2013). The Effect of the Genre-Based Approach

to Teaching Writing on the EFL Al-Azhr Secondary Students' Writing Skills

and Their Attitudes towards Writing. Online Submission.

Ferris, D. (2007). Preparing teachers to respond to student writing.Journal of

Second Language Writing,16(3), 165-193.

Ferris, D., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How

explicit does it need to be?. Journal of second language writing, 10(3),

161-184.

Florio‐Ruane, S., & Lensmire, T. J. (1990). Transforming future teachers’ ideas

about writing instruction. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22(3), 277-289.

Fraenkel, J. R. Wallen, N. E. & Hyun, H. H. (2012).How to design and evaluate research in education (eight ed). New York: McGraw Hill.

Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). Writing Next: Effective Strategies to Improve

Writing of Adolescents in Middle and High Schools. A Report to Carnegie

Corporation of New York. Alliance for Excellent Education.

Halio, M. P. (1990). Student writing: Can the machine maim the

(3)

Harmer, J. (2001).The Practice of Engliish Language Teaching (fourth edition).

New York : Pearson Longman Publishing

Harmer, J. (2007).The Practice of English Language Teaching – fourth edition.

Essex: Pearson Education Limited.

Hashemnezhad, H., & Mohammadnejad, S. (2012). A case for direct and indirect

feedback: The other side of coin. English Language Teaching, 5(3), p230.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of educational

research, 77(1), 81-112.

Heffernan, N., Otoshi, J., & Kaneko, Y. (2014). Written feedback in Japanese

EFL classrooms: A focus on content and organization.The Journal of

Language Teaching and Learning,4(1), 55-68.

Ho, B. (2006). Effectiveness of using the process approach to teach writing in six

Hong Kong primary classrooms. Perspectives: Working Papers in English

and Communication, 17(1), 1-22.

Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2007). The next 20 years.Harvard Business Review,85,

41-52.

Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students'

writing.Language teaching,39(02), 83-101.

Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback in second language writing: Contexts

and issues. Cambridge university press.

Jacobs, H., Zinkgraf, S. A., Wormuth, D. R., Hartfiel, V. F., & Hughey, J. B. (1981). English Composition Program. Testing ESL Composition: a Practical Approach.

Jonassen, D. H., & Kwon II, H. (2001). Communication patterns in computer

mediated versus face-to-face group problem solving. Educational

technology research and development, 49(1), 35-51.

Kamhi-Stein, L. D. (2000). Integrating computer-mediated communication tools

into the practicum. Teacher education, 119-135.

Keh, C. L. (1990). Feedback in the writing process: A model and methods for

(4)

Kelm, O. (1996). The application of computer networking in foreign language

education: Focusing on principles of second language

acquisition.Telecollaboration in foreign language learning, 19-28.

Keys, C.W. (2000).Investigating the Thinking Processes of eight grade Writers

during The Composition of a Scientific Laboratory Report.Journal of

Research in Science Teaching, 37, 679-690.

Kim, Y., and Kim, J. (2005). Teaching Korean University Writing Class:

Balancing the Process and Genre Approach. ASIAN EFL Journal, 7 (2),

1-15.

Kurt, G., Atay, D. (2007). The Effect of Peer Feedback on The Writing Anxiety of

Prospective Turkish Teachers of EFL. Journal of Theory and Practice in

Education, 3(1), 12-23.

Lee, I. (2003). L2 writing teachers’ perspectives, practices and problems regarding error feedback.Assessing Writing,8(3), 216-237.

Lee, I. (2004). Error correction in L2 secondary writing classrooms: The case of

Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(4), 285-312.

Lee, I. (2008). Understanding teachers’ written feedback practices in Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(2), 69-85.

Lee, I. (2010). Writing teacher education and teacher learning: Testimonies of

four EFL teachers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19(3), 143-157.

Lee, L. (2002). Synchronous online exchanges: A study of modification devices

on non-native discourse. System, 30(3), 275-288.

Liaw, M.L. (1998). Using electronic maul for English as a Foreign Language

Instruction.System.26 (pp. 335-351).

Liu, J., & Sadler, R. W. (2003). The effect and affect of peer review in electronic

versus traditional modes on L2 writing. Journal of English for Academic

Purposes, 2(3), 193-227.

Mack, L. (2009). Issues and Dilemmas: What conditions are necessary for

effective teacher written feedback for ESL Learners?.ポリグロシア,16,

(5)

McGrath, A. L., Taylor, A., & Pychyl, T. A. (2011). Writing helpful feedback: The influence of feedback type on students’ perceptions and writing performance. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and

learning, 2(2), 5.

Miao, Y., Badger, R., Zhen, Y. (2006). A Comparative Study of Peer and Teacher

Feedback in a Chinese EFL Writing Class. Journal of Second Language

Writing, 15, 179-200.

Montague, N. (1995). The process oriented approach to teaching writing to second

language learners. New York State Association for Bilingual Education

Journal, 10(2), 13-24.

Moran, C., & Hawisher, G. E. (1998). The rhetorics and languages of electronic

mail. Page to screen: Taking literacy into the electronic era, 80-101.

Nicol, D. (2010). From monologue to dialogue: improving written feedback

processes in mass higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher

Education, 35(5), 501-517.

Osterbur, M. E., Hammer, E. Y., & Hammer, E. (2015). Does Mechanism Matter?

Student Recall of Electronic versus Handwritten Feedback.International

Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning,9(1), 7.

Paulus, T. M. (1999). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student

writing. Journal of second language writing, 8(3), 265-289.

Pham, T. K. D. (2015). Different Forms Of Corrective Feedback And Their Effects On L2 Students’writing Accuracy: A Case Study.Asian Journal of Educational Research Vol,3(1).

Pincas, A. (1982a). Teaching English Writing. London: MacMillan

Purnawarman, P. (2011). Impacts of Different Types of Teacher Corrective

Feedback in Reducing Grammatical Errors on ESL/EFL Students’ Writing.

Blacksburg, VA : Dissertation

Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (2002).Methodology in language teaching:

An anthology of current practice. Cambridge university press.

Rollinson, P. (2005). Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT

(6)

Romiszowski, A., Mason, R. (1996). Computer-mediated

communication.Handbook of research for educational communications and

technology, 2, 397-431.

Sadler, D. R. (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex

appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 535-550.

Seiler, M. F., Ewalt, J. A., Jones, J.T., Landy, B., Olds, S., Young, P., (2013).

Indicators of Efficiency and Effectiveness in Elementary and Secondary

Education Spending. Kentucky: Legislative Research Commission.

Shanahan, T. (2004). Overcoming the Dominance of Communication.Adolescent

literacy research and practice, 59.

Shanahan, T. (2004). Overcoming The Dominance of Communication: Writing to

Think and to Learn. In T.L. Jetton & J.A. Dole (Eds.).Adolescent Literacy

Research and Practice (pp. 59-73).New York: Guilford.

Shih, M. (1986). Content‐Based Approaches to Teaching Academic Writing.Tesol

Quarterly, 20(4), 617-648.

Sotillo, S. M. (2000). Discourse functions and syntactic complexity in

synchronous and asynchronous communication. Language Learning &

Technology, 4(1), 82-119.

Sperling, M., & Freedman, S.W. (2001).Review of Writing Research.In V.

Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (4th ed., pp. 370-389).

Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

Srichanyachon, N. (2012). Teacher written feedback for L2 learners’ writing

development.Silpakorn University Journal of Social Sciences, Humanities,

and Arts,12(1), 7-17.

Tangpermpoon, T. (2008). Integrated approaches to improve students writing

skills for English major students. ABAC Journal, 28(2).

Tuzi, F. (2004). The impact of e-feedback on the revisions of L2 writers in an

academic writing course.Computers and Composition,21(2), 217-235.

Van Beuningen, C. G., De Jong, N. H., & Kuiken, F. (2008). The effect of direct

and indirect corrective feedback on L2 learners’ written accuracy. ITL

(7)

Vyatkina, N. (2011). Writing instruction and policies for written corrective

feedback in the basic language sequence. L2 Journal, 3(1), 63-92.

Wardiman, A. et. al. (2008). English in Focus: for Grade VII Junior High School

(SMP/MTs). Jakarta: Pusat Perbukuan, DEPDIKNAS.

Wardiman, A., Jahur, M. B., Djusma, M. S. (2008). English in Focus for Grade

VII Junior High School (SMP/MTs). Jakarta: PusatPerbukuan,

DepartemenPendidikanNasional.

Warschauer, M. (1996). Telecollaboration in foreign language learning:

Proceedings of the Hawaii symposium (Vol. 12). Natl Foreign Lg Resource

Ctr.

Warschauer, M. (2007). Technology and writing. In International handbook of

English language teaching (pp. 907-917). Springer US.

Williams, J. (2012). The potential role (s) of writing in second language

development. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), 321-331.

Woodson, L. (1981). From Cases to Composition.University of Texas: Foresman

and Company.

Yi, J. Y. (2009). Defining Writing Ability for Classroom Writing Assessment in

High Schools. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

pendekatan ilmiah pada modul sistem operasi ini mendapatkan nilai sangat baik. Tujuh responden pada penelitian mendeskripsikan pendapat yaitu,

Implementasi Metode Sinektik Dalam Pembelajaran Sejarah Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu..

Perlakuan aplikasi pupuk dsar NPK berpengaruh nyata terhadap diameter batang umur 15-60 HST dan produksi per plot.. Interaksi antara frekuensi pemupukan POC dan aplikasi pupuk

dilakukan seseorang dapat dilihat dari hasil yang telah dicapai dalam. belajar, yaitu berupa

Penulis menyadari akan kemampuan yang terbatas yang dimiliki oleh penulis dalam menyelesaikan penulisan hukum tersebut dan usaha inipun tidak terlepas dari bimbingan, dorongan,

Sesuai Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 70 Tahun 2012, tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Peraturan Presiden Nomor 54 Tahun 2010 Tentang Pengadaan Barang/

mengundang Saudara untuk melaksanakan Pembuktian Kualifikasi dengan membawa asli dan fotocopy seluruh dokumen yang sesuai dengan daftar isian dokumen

Berdasarkan Surat Penetapan Pemenang Lelang Nomor : 08/TAP/DPU/CK-04/POKJA/2014 tanggal 17 Juni 2014 tentang Penetapan Pemenang Lelang Paket Pekerjaan Pembangunan Lanjutan Kantor