• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Analisis Rasio Pendapatan Asli Daerah Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah di Provinsi Sumatera Utara

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "Analisis Rasio Pendapatan Asli Daerah Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah di Provinsi Sumatera Utara"

Copied!
15
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Lampiran 1

Sampel Penelitian

Kabupaten/Kota

Kriteria

Jumlah

1

2

Kab. Asahan

Sampel 1

Kab. Batu Bara

x

x

-

Kab. Dairi

Sampel 2

Kab. Deli Serdang

Sampel 3

Kab. Humbang Hasundutan

Sampel 4

Kab. Labuhan Batu

Sampel 5

Kota Padang Sidempuan

Sampel 16

Kota Pematang Siantar

Sampel 17

Kota Sibolga

Sampel 18

Kota Tanjung Balai

Sampel 19

Kota Tebing Tinggi

Sampel 20

(2)

Kontribusi Pajak Daerah terhadap PAD

No.

Nama

Kabupaten/Kota

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

1 Asahan

34.80

37.58

39.25

37.80

26.70

2 Dairi

14.93

19.17

22.94

1598.02

13.71

3 Deli Serdang

65.97

72.62

71.63

77.13

69.65

4 Tanah Karo

39.29

41.32

41.32

39.06

39.56

5 Labuhan Batu

31.62

40.55

40.55

57.21

33.24

6 Langkat

51.82

51.59

26.79

42.25

34.46

7 Mandailing Natal

26.87

53.55

19.53

49.02

14.18

8 Simalungun

35.57

44.79

37.04

33.09

45.73

9 Tapanuli Selatan

21.13

23.88

19.87

13.99

14.32

10 Tapanuli Utara

21.50

13.01

14.98

15.87

17.72

11 Toba Samosir

28.47

29.36

29.36

21.15

21.89

12 Medan

52.32

61.24

61.24

73069.92

77.02

13 Pematang Siantar

45.62

35.77

35.77

44452.87

330.71

14 Sibolga

17.60

21.92

14.82

20.92

13.02

15 Tanjung Balai

20.87

25.52

25.52

20682.86

25.03

16 Tebing Tinggi

22.10

30.36

30.36

26.91

26.51

17 Padang Sidempuan

33.37

32.69

32.69

20.58

17.40

18 Humbang Hasundutan

20.65

19.81

12.58

17.47

16.45

19 Samosir

31.32

35.33

35.33

22.10

16.55

20 Nias Barat

15.32

13.97

13.97

21.33

19.67

(3)

Kontribusi Retribusi Daerah terhadap PAD

No.

Nama

Kabupaten/Kota

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

1 Asahan

21.99

18.85

18.80

15.99

7.71

2 Dairi

23.99

23.48

36.13

4705.76

58.76

3 Deli Serdang

21.71

18.26

21.90

15.84

20.68

4 Tanah Karo

33.74

26.61

38.21

40.62

34.40

5 Labuhan Batu

29.41

26.33

30.31

10.85

6.11

6 Langkat

19.45

16.06

5.49

36.56

14.32

7 Mandailing Natal

30.82

16.68

29.16

23.25

56.04

8 Simalungun

11.26

12.49

23.43

14.21

30.51

9 Tapanuli Selatan

17.53

8.53

11.62

11.84

8.61

10 Tapanuli Utara

16.57

46.78

48.35

46.47

56.77

11 Toba Samosir

34.63

30.04

42.35

38.59

17.77

12 Medan

36.02

23.79

11.14

15624.66

11.52

13 Pematang Siantar

29.94

41.23

41.26

35132.41

13.22

14 Sibolga

47.27

37.65

51.10

45.76

57.57

15 Tanjung Balai

41.63

36.05

39.44

35982.19

41.92

16 Tebing Tinggi

36.64

16.46

10.04

11.30

7.97

17 Padang Sidempuan

36.27

31.08

30.55

48.37

64.57

18 Humbang Hasundutan

28.68

22.19

34.05

30.05

37.77

19 Samosir

30.47

26.91

43.39

35.24

32.45

20 Nias Barat

38.87

16.35

9.25

6.81

4.56

(4)

Kontribusi Hasil Pengelolaan Kekayaan Daerah terhadap PAD

No.

Nama

Kabupaten/Kota

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

1 Asahan

19.83

20.43

17.48

13.43

4.81

2 Dairi

13.55

27.27

24.77

2087.12

7.81

3 Deli Serdang

8.51

6.40

4.59

4.25

2.30

4 Tanah Karo

7.57

9.92

7.66

5.83

2.26

5 Labuhan Batu

27.98

26.72

19.97

22.10

6.11

6 Langkat

11.86

13.60

3.16

7.08

3.15

7 Mandailing Natal

21.95

14.65

20.75

14.20

13.17

8 Simalungun

22.28

30.11

20.87

14.27

9.95

9 Tapanuli Selatan

58.08

53.50

57.51

65.75

64.99

10 Tapanuli Utara

25.98

19.20

19.30

18.96

7.04

11 Toba Samosir

19.56

20.97

15.96

15.48

8.08

12 Medan

1.62

1.18

0.85

787.92

0.67

13 Pematang Siantar

14.39

14.43

18.56

11418.89

5.86

14 Sibolga

19.06

22.62

20.21

19.84

9.03

15 Tanjung Balai

11.79

18.21

17.28

17216.16

15.74

16 Tebing Tinggi

19.61

8.76

25.33

17.85

8.64

17 Padang Sidempuan

22.83

27.36

13.56

0.02

9.46

18 Humbang Hasundutan

26.11

29.86

19.43

20.20

8.48

19 Samosir

4.28

7.49

8.91

6.05

2.55

20 Nias Barat

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

(5)

Kontribusi Lain-lain PAD yang Sah terhadap PAD

No

.

Nama

Kabupaten/Kota

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

1 Asahan

23.38

23.13

24.46

32.78

60.78

2 Dairi

47.53

30.08

16.16

1589.14

19.72

3 Deli Serdang

3.81

2.72

1.88

2.78

7.37

4 Tanah Karo

19.40

22.14

12.81

144.96

23.78

5 Labuhan Batu

10.99

6.40

21.51

9.85

54.54

6 Langkat

16.86

18.76

64.55

14.11

48.07

7 Mandailing Natal

20.36

15.12

30.56

13.53

16.62

8 Simalungun

30.89

12.61

18.65

38.43

13.82

9 Tapanuli Selatan

3.26

14.09

10.99

8.42

12.08

10 Tapanuli Utara

35.96

21.01

17.37

18.70

18.47

11 Toba Samosir

17.33

19.62

20.29

24.78

52.26

12 Medan

10.04

13.80

10.25

10517.56

10.79

13 Pematang Siantar

10.06

8.56

6.77

8997.39

48.62

14 Sibolga

16.07

17.81

13.87

13.48

20.38

15 Tanjung Balai

25.71

20.22

16.66

26121.15

17.31

16 Tebing Tinggi

21.65

44.43

46.65

43.94

56.88

17 Padang Sidempuan

7.53

8.87

11.92

10.54

8.57

18 Humbang Hasundutan

24.57

28.14

33.94

32.28

37.30

19 Samosir

33.94

30.27

26.71

36.60

48.45

20 Nias Barat

45.82

69.67

71.28

71.86

75.77

(6)

Rasio Desentralisasi Fiskal terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah

No.

Nama

Kabupaten/Kota

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

1 Asahan

27.748096 26.493810 27.437537

22.387316 16.256990

2 Dairi

25.376027 31.099463 29.292814

2397.911630 14.318610

3 Deli Serdang

10.845471

7.597881

6.370246

6.384492

5.647122

4 Tanah Karo

21.125324 18.387981 18.267084

19.621463 13.864372

5 Labuhan Batu

14.020983 13.150400 12.860421

16.620472

8.441407

6 Langkat

31.718884 32.094159 10.666508

23.746433 15.602612

7 Mandailing Natal

50.503448 24.808638 37.200586

18.272043 23.558956

8 Simalungun

21.445769 25.352789 22.770945

14.994350 17.060623

9 Tapanuli Selatan

16.975229 11.357875 12.873289

11.703407

9.319879

10 Tapanuli Utara

36.521816 18.750084 21.328743

22.455522 13.708739

11 Toba Samosir

38.193413 34.445526 39.659941

36.215805 29.362505

12 Medan

3.514499

2.760963

2.612992

2716.322742

2.853199

13 Pematang Siantar

18.616056 12.622215 13.406842 11914.551217

9.193069

14 Sibolga

19.549733 17.815686 15.404984

15.703458

9.849847

15 Tanjung Balai

14.080281 14.405154 16.816936 17009.175533 16.432703

16 Tebing Tinggi

13.194252 12.562162 10.185672

11.207802

8.436143

17 Padang Sidempuan

25.727037 22.224801 22.879575

17.870107 12.004598

18 Humbang Hasundutan

40.843197 36.083122 30.799570

35.604291 24.463773

19 Samosir

31.779884 29.286874 25.643863

19.870748 13.173854

20 Nias Barat

115.730786 98.688133 59.193343

45.167641 36.230563

(7)

Rasio Kemandirian terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah

No.

Nama

Kabupaten/Kota

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

1 Asahan

4.410998

5.061548

5.039757

61.108577

99.573827

2 Dairi

4.838399

3.983003

4.006910

49.976650

8.877506

3 Deli Serdang

11.755929

20.093084

23.515587

234.245559

284.576480

4 Tanah Karo

5.721932

6.860615

6.704623

65.821239

9.572403

5 Labuhan Batu

9.384536

11.077179

10.051937

80.164449

1.713659

6 Langkat

3.650356

3.719755

12.188107

53.127871

85.544827

7 Mandailing Natal

2.381356

5.102138

3.405291

67.858544

5.476014

8 Simalungun

5.880357

5.134347

5.472794

87.493563

7.866854

9 Tapanuli Selatan

7.385681

12.743379

9.226825

113.205707

14.071917

10 Tapanuli Utara

3.465717

7.383898

2.668280

29.764108

9.530963

11 Toba Samosir

3.378023

3.712934

3.313422

39.664805

4.469320

12 Medan

45.733469

69.955243

76.154262

80.074083

90.114869

13 Pematang Siantar

7.080595

11.098349

8.917583

10.961678

15.612084

14 Sibolga

5.666317

7.445852

6.875768

75.863783

12.534309

15 Tanjung Balai

8.614967

8.672919

6.622607

7.630886

7.903892

16 Tebing Tinggi

9.693055

10.768169

11.072270

124.451170

17.056683

17 Padang Sidempuan

4.603240

6.002977

4.830682

71.610987

11.083838

18 Humbang Hasundutan

2.963548

3.439403

3.449221

33.973818

5.231879

19 Samosir

3.939211

4.248597

3.957861

60.437646

9.240450

20 Nias Barat

1.064865

1.140755

1.797892

23.783139

3.039028

(8)

Rasio Efektivitas terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah

No.

Nama

Kabupaten/Kota

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

1 Asahan

12.926461

15.835071

1.188409

0.993586

1546.906347

2 Dairi

9.868519

8.788400

1.019676

0.008036

2199.903580

3 Deli Serdang

59.968770

106.311062

0.765724

0.706125

765.681950

4 Tanah Karo

1.044738

1.135259

0.880768

0.962150

1082.717873

5 Labuhan Batu

1.080598

1.041660

1.188783

0.748004

1287.596224

6 Langkat

15.600502

17.175854

2.180201

0.949979

938.571413

7 Mandailing Natal

5.883511

13.687642

0.472758

1.014167

882.384240

8 Simalungun

22.515226

21.155323

0.541550

1.536195

876.274627

9 Tapanuli Selatan

15.172531

28.574742

1.002399

1.080105

1237.342231

10 Tapanuli Utara

7.678114

17.932947

2.378793

1.050188

1721.941404

11 Toba Samosir

0.807142

1.173386

0.874653

1.041911

1107.482725

12 Medan

1.209757

1.199181

0.809985

0.000686

1000.000000

13 Pematang Siantar

1.075718

1.026219

0.831485

0.000857

1565.172985

14 Sibolga

7.521597

10.772447

1.265298

0.963084

1461.313916

15 Tanjung Balai

1.366913

1.223203

0.869630

0.000996

996.745057

16 Tebing Tinggi

1.489205

1.169629

1.635523

1.466646

1569.491452

17 Padang Sidempuan

0.901382

1.086600

1.020023

0.830200

1383.194289

18 Humbang Hasundutan

4.978717

6.399817

1.666041

1.159089

1093.926136

19 Samosir

0.562686

0.690444

1.241533

1.332527

1962.645506

20 Nias Barat

1.057035

1.432128

0.910128

0.880938

1029.805900

(9)

Hasil Regresi Rasio Desentralisasi Fiskal

Uji Chow

Redundant Fixed Effects Tests Pool: Untitled

Test cross-section fixed effects

Effects Test Statistic d.f. Prob.

Cross-section F 2.816198 (18,72) 0.0010

Cross-section Chi-square 50.635705 18 0.0001

Cross-section fixed effects test equation: Dependent Variable: D?

Method: Panel Least Squares Date: 08/02/16 Time: 10:40 Sample: 2010 2014

Included observations: 5 Cross-sections included: 19

Total pool (balanced) observations: 95

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

P? 0.022048 0.026961 0.817756 0.4157 Adjusted R-squared 0.999613 S.D. dependent var 2141.117 S.E. of regression 42.12861 Akaike info criterion 10.37053 Sum squared resid 159733.8 Schwarz criterion 10.50494 Log likelihood -487.6000 Hannan-Quinn criter. 10.42484 F-statistic 60678.31 Durbin-Watson stat 2.191422 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000

Uji Hausman

Correlated Random Effects - Hausman Test Pool: Untitled

Test cross-section random effects

Test Summary

Chi-Sq.

Statistic Chi-Sq. d.f. Prob.

Cross-section random 17.470057 4 0.0016

(10)

Method: Pooled Least Squares Date: 08/02/16 Time: 10:40 Sample: 2010 2014

Included observations: 5 Cross-sections included: 19

Total pool (balanced) observations: 95

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

P? 0.181386 0.041031 4.420676 0.0000

Cross-section fixed (dummy variables)

R-squared 0.999782 Mean dependent var 377.0918 Adjusted R-squared 0.999716 S.D. dependent var 2141.117 S.E. of regression 36.08203 Akaike info criterion 10.21647 Sum squared resid 93737.75 Schwarz criterion 10.83477 Log likelihood -462.2822 Hannan-Quinn criter. 10.46631 F-statistic 15042.14 Durbin-Watson stat 2.657328 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000

(11)

Hasil Regresi Rasio Kemandirian

Uji Chow

Redundant Fixed Effects Tests Pool: POOL01

Test cross-section fixed effects

Effects Test Statistic d.f. Prob.

Cross-section F 1.740680 (18,72) 0.0515

Cross-section Chi-square 34.321913 18 0.0115

Cross-section fixed effects test equation: Dependent Variable: K?

Method: Panel Least Squares Date: 07/28/16 Time: 15:58 Sample: 2010 2014

Included observations: 5 Cross-sections included: 19

Total pool (balanced) observations: 95

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

P? -0.001311 0.029332 -0.044707 0.9644 Adjusted R-squared -0.026784 S.D. dependent var 45.23127 S.E. of regression 45.83301 Akaike info criterion 10.53908 Sum squared resid 189059.9 Schwarz criterion 10.67350 Log likelihood -495.6064 Hannan-Quinn criter. 10.59340 F-statistic 0.386987 Durbin-Watson stat 1.170975 Prob(F-statistic) 0.817442

Uji Hausman

Correlated Random Effects - Hausman Test Pool: POOL01

Test cross-section random effects

Test Summary

Chi-Sq.

Statistic Chi-Sq. d.f. Prob.

Cross-section random 4.250241 4 0.3732

(12)

Dependent Variable: K?

Method: Pooled EGLS (Cross-section random effects) Date: 07/28/16 Time: 16:30

Sample: 2010 2014 Included observations: 5 Cross-sections included: 19

Total pool (balanced) observations: 95

Swamy and Arora estimator of component variances

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

P? -0.007464 0.032573 -0.229146 0.8193

Cross-section random 16.66902 0.1318

Idiosyncratic random 42.77419 0.8682

Weighted Statistics

R-squared 0.008324 Mean dependent var 20.72902 Adjusted R-squared -0.035750 S.D. dependent var 42.08790 S.E. of regression 42.83361 Sum squared resid 165124.6 F-statistic 0.188871 Durbin-Watson stat 1.315799 Prob(F-statistic) 0.943646

(13)

R-squared 0.014449 Mean dependent var 27.49486 Sum squared resid 189532.9 Durbin-Watson stat 1.146349

(14)

Hasil Regresi Rasio Efektivitas

Uji Chow

Redundant Fixed Effects Tests Pool: POOL01

Test cross-section fixed effects

Effects Test Statistic d.f. Prob.

Cross-section F 0.778467 (18,72) 0.7176

Cross-section Chi-square 16.893417 18 0.5304

Cross-section fixed effects test equation: Dependent Variable: E?

Method: Panel Least Squares Date: 08/02/16 Time: 11:00 Sample: 2010 2014

Included observations: 5 Cross-sections included: 19

Total pool (balanced) observations: 95

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

P? -0.868882 0.344639 -2.521138 0.0135 Adjusted R-squared 0.032151 S.D. dependent var 547.3950 S.E. of regression 538.5235 Akaike info criterion 15.46674 Sum squared resid 26100676 Schwarz criterion 15.60115 Log likelihood -729.6699 Hannan-Quinn criter. 15.52105 F-statistic 1.780646 Durbin-Watson stat 1.400385 Prob(F-statistic) 0.139631

Uji Hausman

Correlated Random Effects - Hausman Test Pool: POOL01

Test cross-section random effects

Test Summary

Chi-Sq.

Statistic Chi-Sq. d.f. Prob.

Cross-section random 12.548840 4 0.0137

** WARNING: estimated cross-section random effects variance is zero.

(15)

Dependent Variable: E? Method: Pooled Least Squares Date: 08/02/16 Time: 10:53 Sample: 2010 2014

Included observations: 5 Cross-sections included: 19

Total pool (balanced) observations: 95

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

P? -0.868882 0.344639 -2.521138 0.0135

R? 3.465279 1.379986 2.511098 0.0138

H? -8.483823 3.371956 -2.515995 0.0136

L? 1.494424 0.595891 2.507880 0.0139

C 313.9287 58.44645 5.371218 0.0000

R-squared 0.073336 Mean dependent var 264.6842 Adjusted R-squared 0.032151 S.D. dependent var 547.3950 S.E. of regression 538.5235 Akaike info criterion 15.46674 Sum squared resid 26100676 Schwarz criterion 15.60115 Log likelihood -729.6699 Hannan-Quinn criter. 15.52105 F-statistic 1.780646 Durbin-Watson stat 1.400385 Prob(F-statistic) 0.139631

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Su : Bapak jangan bersedih begitu dong saya jadi sedih juga S : Ini pak sudah ada pak, ayo pak, tenang pak, nih orangnya pak K : Lu harus bertanggung jawab sama anak saya?. D :

Pada hari ini, Senin, tanggal tiga, bulan September, tahun dua ribu dua belas, Kami selaku Panitia Pengadaan Barang / Jasa telah mengadakan Pemberian Penjelasan

meningkatkan kekuatan dan daya tahan otot adalah latihan beban dengan circuit weight

MA pada MAN Model Kota Jambi, maka sesuai dengan tahapan evaluasi Pelelangan Pemilihan Langsung pascakualifikasi, Pokja melakukan Pembuktian Kualifikasi/Klarifikasi

Sehubungan dengan Proses Pelelangan Pemilihan Langsung Pascakualifikasi untuk Pekerjaan REHABILITASI RUANG KELAS MI ( REHAB RINGAN ) 3 RUANG pada MIN Kota Jambi, maka

Form: 8 LEMBAR HASIL PENILAIAN SEJAWAT SEBIDANG ATAU PEER REVIEW. I(ARYA ILMIAH :

[r]

Bawang merah dapat digunakan sebagai obat herbal yang berfungsi untuk menurunkan suhu tubuh (kompres), secara umum bawang merah ( Allium Cepa var. ascalonicum ) adalah