• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

12. Kumar A, Shetty V. Abstract W P330: Intracerebral Hemorrhage Volume Measurement: Modified ABC/2 Method is Faster and Reliable. Stroke [Internet].

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Membagikan "12. Kumar A, Shetty V. Abstract W P330: Intracerebral Hemorrhage Volume Measurement: Modified ABC/2 Method is Faster and Reliable. Stroke [Internet]."

Copied!
32
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

1. Bornstein NM. Stroke Practical Guide for Clinicians Bornstein NM. Switzerland: Karger; 2009. 9-23 p.

2. RI BP dan PKKK. Riset Kesehatan Dasar 2013. Jakarta; 2013.

3. Widyono. Profil Kesehatan Kota Semarang 2014 [Internet]. Semarang; 2014. Available from: www.dinkes-kotasemarang.go.id

4. Mohr, JP, Philip A Wolf JCG. Stroke Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Management. Elsevier Saunders. Philadelphia; 2011. 295-307 p.

5. Martin JH. Neuroanatomy Text and Atlas. 3rd ed. Mc Graw Hill; 2003. 6. Chong TT-J, Fedi M. Acute management of stroke – II: haemorrhagic

stroke. Anaesth Intensive Care Med [Internet]. 2013;14(9):366–70.

Available from:

http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1472029913001975

7. Zis P, Leivadeas P, Michas D, Kravaritis D, Angelidakis P, Tavernarakis A. Predicting 30-day case fatality of primary inoperable intracerebral hemorrhage based on findings at the emergency department. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis [Internet]. 2014 Aug 8;23(7):1928–33. Available from: http://www.strokejournal.org/article/S1052305714000664/fulltext

8. Hanifah, Dinna, Dyan Roshinta Laksmi Dewi SNYRSA. Pengaruh Volume Perdarahan dan Skor Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) Saat Masuk Rumah Sakit Terhadap Kejadian Mortalitas Pada Pasien Stroke Perdarahan Intraserebral Di RSUD DR. Soedarso Pontianak. 2015;1:1689–99.

9. WJ Powers JJ. Stroke Overview. Elsevier Saunders. Philadelphia; 2014. 10. Zazulia A. Intracerebral Hemorrhage, Primary. Elsevier Saunders.

Philadelphia; 2014.

11. Kleinman JT, Jordan LC, Hillis AE. ABC/2: estimating intracerebral haemorrhage volume and total brain volume and predicting outcome in children. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010;

(2)

12. Kumar A, Shetty V. Abstract W P330: Intracerebral Hemorrhage Volume Measurement: Modified ABC/2 Method is Faster and Reliable. Stroke [Internet]. 2015 Feb 1;46(Suppl_1):AWP330 – . Available from: http://stroke.ahajournals.org/content/46/Suppl_1/AWP330

13. Harrison JK, McArthur KS, Quinn TJ. Assessment scales in stroke: clinimetric and clinical considerations. Clin Interv Aging [Internet].

2013;8:201–11. Available from:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3578502/

14. Budiyono T. Hubungan Derajat Berat Stroke Non Hemoragik pada saat Masuk Rumah Sakit dengan Waktu Pencapaian Maksimal Aktifitas Kehidupan Sehari-hari. Universitas Diponegoro; 2005.

15. Wihartantie A, dr. Retno Dwi Danarti SRO. Hubungan Perdarahan Intraserebral Dan Glasgow Coma Scale Pada Stroke Dengan Pemeriksaan Multiclice Computed Tomography Scan. 2011; Available from: http://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=Pen elitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=53536

16. Singh AJ, Pmr DNB. CT Scan as a Tool for Predicting Outcome of Stroke due to Intracerebral Haemorrhage at a Referral Hospital. 2006;17(October):33–8.

17. Demchuk AM, Dowlatshahi D, Rodriguez-Luna D, Molina C a., Blas YS, Dzialowski I, et al. Prediction of haematoma growth and outcome in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage using the CT-angiography spot sign (PREDICT): A prospective observational study. Lancet Neurol

[Internet]. 2012;11(4):307–14. Available from:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70038-8

18. Ritarwan K. Pengaruh Suhu Tubuh Terhadap Outcome Penderita Stroke Yang Dirawat Di RSUP H. Adam Malik Medan. 2003;1–30.

19. Kim K-H. Predictors of 30-day mortality and 90-day functional recovery after primary intracerebral hemorrhage : hospital based multivariate analysis in 585 patients. J Korean Neurosurg Soc [Internet]. 2009

(3)

http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2711231&tool= pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract

20. Joarder M, Karim A, Barua K, Hossain M. A study on-effect of hematoma and perihematomal edema volume on GCS at the time of admission in patients with spontaneous lobar and basal ganglia hemorrhage. Pulse

[Internet]. 2015 May 7;7(1):22. Available from:

http://www.banglajol.info/index.php/PULSE/article/view/23246

21. Rea P. Essential Clinical Anatomy of The Nervous System. Academic Press; 2015. 4 p.

22. David S Liebeskind M. Hemorrhagic Stroke: Practice Essentials, Background, Anatomy. Medscape [Internet]. 2015; Available from: http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1916662-overview

23. Sidharta P DG. Anatomi Susunan Saraf Pusat Manusia. Jakarta: Dian Rakyat; 1986. 398 p.

24. J G. Basic Neurology 3rd Edition. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2000. 25. Layanto A. Hubungan Antara Lokasi Lesi Pada Penderita Stroke Iskemik

Fase Akut Dengan Waktu Perawatan Dan Waktu Kematian Dalam 30 Hari Pertama. Universitas Diponegoro Semarang; 2009.

26. Tubbs RS. Circle of Willis Anatomy: Overview, Gross Anatomy, Natural Variants. Medscape [Internet]. 2013; Available from: http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1877617-overview

27. Cristy. Asosiasi Genotip Apolipoprotein E Dengan Fungsi Kognitif Pada Pasien Pasca Stroke Iskemik. Universitas Diponegoro Semarang; 2011. 28. Donnan GA, Fisher M, Macleod M, Davis SM. Stroke. Lancet [Internet].

2008 May 10;371(9624):1612–23. Available from:

http://www.thelancet.com/article/S0140673608606947/fulltext

29. Smith EE, Liang L, Hernandez a., Reeves MJ, Cannon CP, Fonarow GC, et al. Influence of stroke subtype on quality of care in the Get with the Guidelines-Stroke Program. Neurology. 2009;73(9):709–16.

30. Sacco RL, Kasner SE, Broderick JP, Caplan LR, Connors JJB, Culebras A, et al. An updated definition of stroke for the 21st century: a statement for

(4)

healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke [Internet]. 2013 Jul;44(7):2064–89. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23652265

31. Soeharto I. Penyakit Jantung Koroner dan Serangan Jantung : Pencegahan,Penyembuhan, Rehabilitasi. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka; 2004.

32. Saenger AK, Christenson RH. Stroke biomarkers: progress and challenges for diagnosis, prognosis, differentiation, and treatment. Clin Chem

[Internet]. 2010 Jan;56(1):21–33. Available from:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19926776

33. Gorelick PB. Risk factors for vascular dementia and Alzheimer disease. Stroke. 2004;35(11 SUPPL. 1):2620–2.

34. Zebian B, Critchley G. Spontaneous intracranial haemorrhage. Surgery

[Internet]. 2012;30(3):136–41. Available from:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mpsur.2011.12.005

35. LR C. Caplan’s Stroke : A Clinical Approach. 3rd ed. Boston: Butterworth-Heineman; 2000.

36. Quinones-Hinojosa A. Schmidek & sweet Operative Neurosurgical Techniques Indications, Methods, and Results. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2012.

37. Chan S, Hemphill JC. Critical Care Management of Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Crit Care Clin [Internet]. 2014;30(4):699–717. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0749070414000499 38. Alberti A, Agnelli G, Caso V, Venti M, Acciarresi M, D’Amore C, et al.

Non-neurological complications of acute stroke: frequency and influence on clinical outcome. Intern Emerg Med. 2011;6(S1):119–23.

39. Bonaiuti D, Sioli P, Fumagalli L, Beghi E, Agostoni E. Acute medical complications in patients admitted to a stroke unit and safe transfer to rehabilitation. Neurol Sci [Internet]. 2011;32(4):619–23. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10072-011-0588-2

(5)

Radiologic estimation of hematoma volume in intracerebral hemorrhage trial by CT scan. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol [Internet]. 2006 Mar;27(3):666– 70. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16552014

41. Broderick JP, Brott TG, Duldner JE, Tomsick T, Huster G. Volume of Intracerebral Hemorrhage A Powerful and Easy-to-Use Predictor of 30-Day Mortality. 1988;

42. Setiahardja AS. Penilaian Keseimbangan dengan Aktivitas Kehidupan Sehari-hari pada Lansia. Universitas Diponegoro; 2005.

43. Isaac E. MDS. Hemorrhagic Stroke: An Atlas of Investigation and Treatment. Clinical Publishing; 2010.

44. Yasaka M, Sakata T, Minematsu K, Naritomi H. Correction of INR by prothrombin complex concentrate and vitamin K in patients with warfarin related hemorrhagic complication. Thromb Res. 2002;108(1):25–30. 45. Nag C, Das K, Ghosh M, Khandakar MR. Prediction of clinical outcome in

acute hemorrhagic stroke from a single CT scan on admission. N Am J Med Sci. 2012;4(10):463–7.

46. Anggiamurni L. Hubungan Volume Dan Letak Lesi Hematoma Dengan Kecepatan Pemulihan Fungsi Motorik Penderita Stroke Hemoragik Berdasarkan Kategori Skala Orgogozo. Universitas Diponegoro; 2010. 47. Castellanos M, Leira R, Tejada J, Gil-Peralta A, Dávalos A, Castillo J, et

al. Predictors of good outcome in medium to large spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhages. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry

[Internet]. 2005 May;76(5):691–5. Available from:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15834028

48. Molshatzki N, Orion D, Tsabari R, Schwammenthal Y, Merzeliak O, Toashi M, et al. Chronic kidney disease in patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage: association with large hematoma volume and poor outcome. Cerebrovasc Dis [Internet]. 2011;31(3):271–7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21178352

49. Bagg S, Pombo AP, Hopman W. Effect of Age on Functional Outcomes After Stroke Rehabilitation. Stroke [Internet]. 2002 Jan 1;33(1):179–85.

(6)

Available from: http://stroke.ahajournals.org/cgi/doi/10.1161/hs0102.101224

50. Yu C, An Z, Zhao W, Wang W, Gao C, Liu S, et al. Sex Differences in Stroke Subtypes, Severity, Risk Factors, and Outcomes among Elderly Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke. Front Aging Neurosci [Internet].

2015;7:174. Available from:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26441636

51. Saxena A, Anderson CS, Wang X, Sato S, Arima H, Chan E, et al. Prognostic Significance of Hyperglycemia in Acute Intracerebral

Hemorrhage. Stroke [Internet]. 2016 Jan

26;47(3):STROKEAHA.115.011627. Available from:

http://stroke.ahajournals.org/lookup/doi/10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.01162 7

52. Iqbal M, Frida M, Yaswir R. Perbedaan Rerata Kadar Gula Darah pada Luaran Stroke Iskemik Berdasarkan Indeks Barthel. J Kesehat Andalas. 2014;3(3).

53. Karunawan NH, Pinzon RT, Saputro SA. Pengaruh Kondisi Hiperglikemia Saat Masuk RS terhadap Luaran Fungsional Pasien Stroke Iskemik di RS Bethesda. Cermin Dunia Kedokt. 2016;43(2):87–90.

54. Kurube I. Stroke Hemoragik Pada Pasien Yang Dirawat Di RSUP Dr . Wahidin Sudirohusodo Periode Juli 2012- Desember 2012. 2013;

55. Susilo TA. Pengaruh Hiperglikemia Terhadap Mortalitas Pada Penderita Stroke Iskemik Fase Akut Di Rsud Dr. Moewardi. 2015;

56. Greer DM, Funk SE, Reaven NL, Ouzounelli M, Uman GC. Impact of fever on outcome in patients with stroke and neurologic injury: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Stroke [Internet]. 2008 Nov;39(11):3029–35. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18723420

57. El-solh A, Sikka P, Bozkanat E, Jaafar W. Morbid Obesity in the Medical ICU Morbid Obesity in the Medical ICU. October. 2007;1989–97.

58. Marlina I, Dr. dr. Ismail Setyopranoto SS. Skor Perdarahan Intraventrikel Sebagai Prediktor Mortalitas Pada Pasien Stroke Perdarahan Intraserebral.

(7)

2013.

59. Chen G, Arima H, Wu G, Heeley E, Delcourt C, Zhang P, et al. Subarachnoid extension of intracerebral hemorrhage and 90-day outcomes in INTERACT2. Stroke [Internet]. 2014 Jan;45(1):258–60. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24149007

(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)

Lampiran 3. Data Hasil Pengukuran

No CM Usia Jenis

kelamin

Hipertensi Diabetes Melitus

Hiperkolesterolemia Obesitas SAH IVH Volume perdarahan

Barthel Index

C550543 55 tahun laki-laki Ya Tidak Tidak Tidak Tidak Tidak 80 0

A567266 48 tahun laki-laki Tidak Tidak Tidak Ya Tidak Tidak 10,28 38

C563832 78 tahun laki-laki Ya Ya Tidak Tidak Tidak Tidak 14,22 20

C540047 63 tahun laki-laki Ya Tidak Tidak Tidak Tidak Tidak 16,8 0

C579201 40 tahun perempuan Ya Ya Ya Tidak Tidak Tidak 45 0

C542601 48 tahun perempuan Ya Tidak Tidak Tidak Tidak Tidak 18,66 20

C568878 74 tahun perempuan Ya Ya Ya Tidak Tidak Tidak 30,75 0

C540566 50 tahun perempuan Ya Ya Tidak Tidak Tidak Tidak 18,36 35

(13)

C585587 58 tahun perempuan Ya Tidak Ya Ya Tidak Tidak 60,35 59

B244140 47 tahun laki-laki Tidak Tidak Ya Tidak Tidak Tidak 58,3 20

C569284 46 tahun laki-laki Ya Tidak Tidak Ya Ya Tidak 46,76 100

C578053 64 tahun perempuan Tidak Ya Ya Tidak Ya Tidak 1,94 20

C573334 61 tahun perempuan Ya Ya Ya Ya Tidak Ya 15,85 20

C567418 84 tahun perempuan Tidak Tidak Tidak Tidak Tidak Tidak 11 14

C566529 70 tahun laki-laki Tidak Tidak Tidak Tidak Ya Tidak 63 20

C574728 54 tahun Laki-laki Tidak Ya Tidak Tidak Tidak Ya 23,3 20

C575938 52 tahun perempuan Ya Tidak Tidak Tidak Tidak Tidak 51,76 0

C572627 66 tahun laki-laki Tidak Ya Tidak Tidak Ya Ya 10,64 19

C57834 62 tahun laki-laki Ya Tidak Tidak Tidak Tidak Ya 32 6

(14)

C366230 55 tahun perempuan Ya Ya Tidak Ya Tidak Ya 44,46 17

C586775 61 tahun perempuan Ya Tidak Tidak Tidak Tidak Tidak 48,02 32

C565083 61 tahun laki-laki Ya Ya Tidak Tidak Tidak Ya 74 0

B260516 74 tahun perempuan Ya Tidak Ya Tidak Tidak Tidak 1,29 20

C572827 74 tahun perempuan Ya Tidak Tidak Tidak Tidak Tidak 39 17

C510142 46 tahun perempuan Ya Tidak Ya Ya Tidak Tidak 19,21 19

C567202 52 tahun perempuan Ya Ya Ya Ya Tidak Tidak 5,6 0

(15)

Lampiran 4. Hasil Analisa Statistik

Frequencies

Frequency Table

Jenis kel amin

12 41.4 41.4 41.4 17 58.6 58.6 100.0 29 100.0 100.0 Laki-laki Perempuan Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulat iv e Percent Hipertensi 22 75.9 75.9 75.9 7 24.1 24.1 100.0 29 100.0 100.0 Y a Tidak Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulat iv e Percent DM 12 41.4 41.4 41.4 17 58.6 58.6 100.0 29 100.0 100.0 Y a Tidak Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulat iv e Percent Hiperkolesterolemi a 11 37.9 37.9 37.9 18 62.1 62.1 100.0 29 100.0 100.0 Y a Tidak Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulat iv e Percent

(16)

Obesitas 8 27.6 27.6 27.6 21 72.4 72.4 100.0 29 100.0 100.0 Y a Tidak Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulat iv e Percent SAH 4 13.8 13.8 13.8 25 86.2 86.2 100.0 29 100.0 100.0 Y a Tidak Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulat iv e Percent IVH 7 24.1 24.1 24.1 22 75.9 75.9 100.0 29 100.0 100.0 Y a Tidak Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulat iv e Percent Barthel Index 23 79.3 79.3 79.3 5 17.2 17.2 96.6 1 3.4 3.4 100.0 29 100.0 100.0 Total Berat Mandiri Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulat iv e Percent

(17)

Explore

Nonparametric Correlations

Case Summaries 29 29 29 58.83 30.51 20.21 11.000 22.565 21.569 58.00 23.30 19.00 40 0 0 84 80 100 N Mean St d. Dev iation Median Minimum Maximum Usia Volume

perdarahan Bart hel I ndex

Tests of Normality .963 29 .382 .933 29 .065 .773 29 .000 Usia Volume perdarahan Bart hel I ndex

St at ist ic df Sig.

Shapiro-Wilk

Lillief ors Signif icance Correction a. Correlati ons 1.000 -.200 -.074 . .299 .704 29 29 29 -.200 1.000 -.165 .299 . .391 29 29 29 -.074 -.165 1.000 .704 .391 . 29 29 29

Correlation Coef f icient Sig. (2-tailed)

N

Correlation Coef f icient Sig. (2-tailed)

N

Correlation Coef f icient Sig. (2-tailed)

N Usia

Volume perdarahan

Bart hel I ndex Spearman's rho

Usia

Volume

(18)

Graph

(19)

Crosstabs

Jenis kelamin * Barthel Index

Crosstab 9 3 12 9.5 2.5 12.0 39.1% 50.0% 41.4% 14 3 17 13.5 3.5 17.0 60.9% 50.0% 58.6% 23 6 29 23.0 6.0 29.0 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Count Expected Count % wit hin Barthel Index Count

Expected Count % wit hin Barthel Index Count

Expected Count % wit hin Barthel Index Laki-laki

Perempuan Jenis kelamin

Total

Total Berat /Mandiri Bart hel Index

Total Chi-Square Tests .232b 1 .630 .000 1 .987 .229 1 .632 .669 .487 .224 1 .636 29 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases Value df Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.

2 cells (50.0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2. 48.

(20)

Hipertensi * Barthel Index

Crosstab 17 5 22 17.4 4.6 22.0 73.9% 83.3% 75.9% 6 1 7 5.6 1.4 7.0 26.1% 16.7% 24.1% 23 6 29 23.0 6.0 29.0 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Count Expected Count % wit hin Barthel Index Count

Expected Count % wit hin Barthel Index Count

Expected Count % wit hin Barthel Index Y a

Tidak Hipertensi

Total

Total Berat /Mandiri Bart hel I ndex

Total Chi-Square Tests .231b 1 .631 .000 1 1.000 .245 1 .620 1.000 .545 .223 1 .637 29 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases Value df Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.

2 cells (50.0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1. 45.

(21)

DM * Barthel Index

Crosstab 11 1 12 9.5 2.5 12.0 47.8% 16.7% 41.4% 12 5 17 13.5 3.5 17.0 52.2% 83.3% 58.6% 23 6 29 23.0 6.0 29.0 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Count Expected Count % wit hin Barthel Index Count

Expected Count % wit hin Barthel Index Count

Expected Count % wit hin Barthel Index Y a

Tidak DM

Total

Total Berat /Mandiri Bart hel I ndex

Total Chi-Square Tests 1.905b 1 .168 .837 1 .360 2.088 1 .148 .354 .182 1.839 1 .175 29 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases Value df Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.

2 cells (50.0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2. 48.

(22)

Hiperkolesterolemia * Barthel Index

Crosstab 10 1 11 8.7 2.3 11.0 43.5% 16.7% 37.9% 13 5 18 14.3 3.7 18.0 56.5% 83.3% 62.1% 23 6 29 23.0 6.0 29.0 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Count Expected Count % wit hin Barthel Index Count

Expected Count % wit hin Barthel Index Count

Expected Count % wit hin Barthel Index Y a

Tidak Hiperkolesterolemia

Total

Total Berat /Mandiri Bart hel Index

Total Chi-Square Tests 1.453b 1 .228 .537 1 .464 1.597 1 .206 .362 .237 1.403 1 .236 29 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases Value df Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.

2 cells (50.0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2. 28.

(23)

Obesitas * Barthel Index

Crosstab 4 4 8 6.3 1.7 8.0 17.4% 66.7% 27.6% 19 2 21 16.7 4.3 21.0 82.6% 33.3% 72.4% 23 6 29 23.0 6.0 29.0 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Count Expected Count % wit hin Barthel Index Count

Expected Count % wit hin Barthel Index Count

Expected Count % wit hin Barthel Index Y a

Tidak Obesitas

Total

Total Berat /Mandiri Bart hel I ndex

Total Chi-Square Tests 5.784b 1 .016 3.580 1 .058 5.270 1 .022 .033 .033 5.585 1 .018 29 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases Value df Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.

2 cells (50.0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1. 66.

(24)

SAH * Barthel Index

Crosstab 3 1 4 3.2 .8 4.0 13.0% 16.7% 13.8% 20 5 25 19.8 5.2 25.0 87.0% 83.3% 86.2% 23 6 29 23.0 6.0 29.0 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Count Expected Count % wit hin Barthel Index Count

Expected Count % wit hin Barthel Index Count

Expected Count % wit hin Barthel Index Y a

Tidak SAH

Total

Total Berat /Mandiri Bart hel I ndex

Total Chi-Square Tests .053b 1 .819 .000 1 1.000 .051 1 .822 1.000 .627 .051 1 .822 29 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases Value df Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.

2 cells (50.0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is . 83.

(25)

IVH * Barthel Index

Crosstab 6 1 7 5.6 1.4 7.0 26.1% 16.7% 24.1% 17 5 22 17.4 4.6 22.0 73.9% 83.3% 75.9% 23 6 29 23.0 6.0 29.0 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Count Expected Count % wit hin Barthel Index Count

Expected Count % wit hin Barthel Index Count

Expected Count % wit hin Barthel Index Y a

Tidak IVH

Total

Total Berat /Mandiri Bart hel I ndex

Total Chi-Square Tests .231b 1 .631 .000 1 1.000 .245 1 .620 1.000 .545 .223 1 .637 29 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases Value df Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.

2 cells (50.0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1. 45.

(26)

Explore

Barthel Index

Usia

Case Summaries Usia 23 60.26 11.624 61.00 40 84 6 53.33 6.121 53.50 46 61 29 58.83 11.000 58.00 40 84

Bart hel I ndex Total Berat /Mandiri Total

N Mean Std. Dev iat ion Median Minimum Maximum

Tests of Normal ity

.972 23 .746

.912 6 .448

Bart hel I ndex Total

Berat /Mandiri Usia

St at ist ic df Sig. Shapiro-Wilk

Lillief ors Signif icance Correction a.

(27)

T-Test

Group Statistics

23 60.26 11.624 2.424

6 53.33 6.121 2.499

Bart hel I ndex Total

Berat /Mandiri Usia

N Mean Std. Dev iat ion

Std. Error Mean

Independent Samples Test

2.179 .151 1.397 1.990 27 15.679 .174 .064 6.928 6.928 4.959 3.481 -3.248 -.465 17.103 14.320 F Sig. Lev ene's Test f or

Equality of Variances t df

Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Dif f erence St d. Error Dif f erence

Lower Upper 95% Conf idence Interv al of the Dif f erence t-t est f or Equality of Means Equal v ariances assumed Equal v ariances not assumed Usia

(28)

Explore

Case Summaries Volume perdarahan 23 30.46 22.697 23.30 1 80 6 30.70 24.179 32.56 0 60 29 30.51 22.565 23.30 0 80

Bart hel I ndex Total Berat /Mandiri Total

N Mean Std. Dev iat ion Median Minimum Maximum

Tests of Normal ity

.923 23 .076

.912 6 .450

Bart hel I ndex Total

Berat /Mandiri Volume perdarahan

Stat istic df Sig.

Shapiro-Wilk

Lillief ors Signif icance Correction a.

(29)

T-Test

Group Statisti cs

23 30.46 22.697 4.733

6 30.70 24.179 9.871

Bart hel Index Total

Berat /Mandiri Volume perdarahan

N Mean St d. Dev iation

St d. Error Mean

Independent Samples Test

.207 .652 -.022 -.021 27 7.473 .982 .983 -.235 -.235 10.534 10.947 -21.849 -25.792 21.378 25.322 F Sig. Lev ene's Test f or

Equality of Variances t df

Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Dif f erence St d. Error Dif f erence

Lower Upper 95% Conf idence Interv al of the Dif f erence t-t est f or Equality of Means Equal v ariances assumed Equal v ariances not assumed Volume perdarahan

(30)

Logistic Regression

Block 1: Method = Backward Stepwise (Likelihood Ratio)

Classification Tablea 22 1 95.7 3 3 50.0 86.2 22 1 95.7 3 3 50.0 86.2 22 1 95.7 3 3 50.0 86.2 22 1 95.7 3 3 50.0 86.2 22 1 95.7 3 3 50.0 86.2 22 1 95.7 3 3 50.0 86.2 22 1 95.7 3 3 50.0 86.2 Observ ed Total Berat /Mandiri Bart hel I ndex

Ov erall Percentage Total Berat /Mandiri Bart hel I ndex

Ov erall Percentage Total Berat /Mandiri Bart hel I ndex

Ov erall Percentage Total Berat /Mandiri Bart hel I ndex

Ov erall Percentage Total Berat /Mandiri Bart hel I ndex

Ov erall Percentage Total Berat /Mandiri Bart hel I ndex

Ov erall Percentage Total Berat /Mandiri Bart hel I ndex

Ov erall Percentage St ep 1 St ep 2 St ep 3 St ep 4 St ep 5 St ep 6 St ep 7

Total Berat /Mandiri

Bart hel I ndex Percentage Correct Predicted

The cut v alue is .500 a.

(31)

Variables in the Equation -.056 .077 .526 1 .468 .946 .814 1.099 .966 1.619 .356 1 .551 2.628 .110 62.809 -.314 2.069 .023 1 .879 .731 .013 42.149 1.709 1.573 1.180 1 .277 5.523 .253 120.615 2.874 1.830 2.466 1 .116 17.711 .490 640.149 -2.915 1.594 3.344 1 .067 .054 .002 1.233 -.379 2.704 .020 1 .888 .684 .003 136.951 .000 .030 .000 1 .988 1.000 .943 1.062 -1.846 8.587 .046 1 .830 .158 -.055 .076 .529 1 .467 .946 .815 1.099 .968 1.619 .357 1 .550 2.632 .110 62.798 -.321 2.008 .026 1 .873 .725 .014 37.127 1.711 1.568 1.190 1 .275 5.532 .256 119.558 2.873 1.829 2.469 1 .116 17.693 .491 637.215 -2.910 1.564 3.462 1 .063 .054 .003 1.168 -.391 2.596 .023 1 .880 .676 .004 109.608 -1.816 8.346 .047 1 .828 .163 -.056 .076 .533 1 .465 .946 .815 1.098 .904 1.544 .343 1 .558 2.470 .120 50.923 -.277 2.012 .019 1 .890 .758 .015 39.103 1.711 1.570 1.188 1 .276 5.537 .255 120.115 2.881 1.827 2.488 1 .115 17.834 .497 639.751 -2.922 1.560 3.507 1 .061 .054 .003 1.146 -2.506 6.831 .135 1 .714 .082 -.058 .073 .631 1 .427 .944 .818 1.089 .971 1.463 .440 1 .507 2.640 .150 46.428 1.716 1.558 1.213 1 .271 5.561 .262 117.840 2.877 1.812 2.522 1 .112 17.768 .510 619.415 -2.913 1.544 3.559 1 .059 .054 .003 1.120 -2.809 6.317 .198 1 .656 .060 -.061 .077 .621 1 .431 .941 .809 1.095 1.479 1.415 1.093 1 .296 4.387 .274 70.184 2.374 1.587 2.238 1 .135 10.742 .479 240.989 -2.719 1.463 3.452 1 .063 .066 .004 1.161 -.062 4.908 .000 1 .990 .940 1.553 1.427 1.183 1 .277 4.725 .288 77.506 2.322 1.586 2.144 1 .143 10.193 .456 228.086 -3.188 1.414 5.088 1 .024 .041 .003 .658 -2.842 3.351 .719 1 .396 .058 2.455 1.511 2.639 1 .104 11.645 .602 225.157 -3.075 1.321 5.420 1 .020 .046 .003 .615 -.608 2.441 .062 1 .803 .545 Usia sex Hipertensi DM Hiperkolesterolemia Obesit as SAH Vol_perdarahan Constant St ep 1a Usia sex Hipertensi DM Hiperkolesterolemia Obesit as SAH Constant St ep 2a Usia sex Hipertensi DM Hiperkolesterolemia Obesit as Constant St ep 3a Usia sex DM Hiperkolesterolemia Obesit as Constant St ep 4a Usia DM Hiperkolesterolemia Obesit as Constant St ep 5a DM Hiperkolesterolemia Obesit as Constant St ep 6a Hiperkolesterolemia Obesit as Constant St ep 7a

B S. E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper

95.0% C.I. f or EXP(B)

Variable(s) entered on step 1: Usia, sex, Hipertensi, DM, Hiperkolesterolemia, Obesitas, SAH, Vol_perdarahan. a.

(32)

Lampiran 5. Biodata Mahasiswa Identitas

Nama : Ahda Amila Sholiha

NIM : 22010112130198

Tempat/tanggal lahir : Grobogan, 22 November 1993 Jenis kelamin : Perempuan

Alamat : Jalan Pondok Dustira 234A Sukamaju Padasuka RT9 RW6 Cimahi Tengah 40526

Nomor telepon : (022)-6610418

Nomor HP : 087832840125

e-mail : [email protected]

Riwayat Pendidikan Formal

1. SD : MI Asih Putera Lulus tahun : 2005

2. SMP : SMP Negeri 2 Cimahi Lulus tahun : 2008

3. SMA : SMA Negeri 2 Cimahi Lulus tahun : 2011

4. FK UNDIP : Masuk tahun : 2012 Keanggotaan Organisasi

1. Eksekutif muda EKOBIS BEM KM FK UNDIP tahun 2014

2. Staf departemen KSKI ROHIS KU UNDIP tahun 2013 sampai 2014 3. Anggota KSM KU UNDIP tahun 2013 sampai 2014

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Hasil penelitian menunjukkan pemberian pupuk kandang sapi dan mikoriza berpengaruh nyata terhadap tinggi tanaman, volume akar, jumlah cabang, berat segar brangkasan, berat kering

Demikian biodata ini saya buat dengan sebenarnya untuk memenuhi salah satu persyaratan dalam pengajuan Program Kreatifitas MahasiswaC. Semarang, Juni 2015

Abstrak: Parenting memegang peranan yang sangat penting dalam membentuk karakter dan kepribadian anak, maka untuk dapat menghasilkan anak-anak yang memiliki karakter yang

CSR sebagai konsep akuntansi yang baru adalah transparansi pengungkapan sosial atas kegiatan atau aktivitas sosial yang dilakukan oleh perusahaan, di mana transparansi informasi

Aset keuangan pada awalnya diakui pada nilai wajar ditambah, dalam hal investasi tidak diukur pada nilai wajar melalui laporan laba rugi, biaya transaksi yang

[r]

Kerusakan ini dapat merusak pulpa, dengan atau tanpa menyebabkan kerusakan pada mahkota dan atau akar, atau pada kasus yang parah dapat menyebabkan perpindahan

Di ruang rapat Universitas Sanata Dharma, dosen sedang memberikan bolpen dan buku tulis untuk mengikuti acara pendampingan tentang latihan kepemimpinan, sesuai jadual bimbingan