S BIO 1100053 Bibliography

(1)

80

Dwie Saptarani, 2015

PENALARAN INFORMAL MENGENAI ISU SOSIO-SAINTIFIK PADA JENJANG PENDIDIKAN SD, SMP, DAN SMA Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Anagun, Sengul S. & M. Ozden. (2010). Teacher Candidates’ Perceptions Regarding Socio-scientific issues and Their Competencies in Using Socio-scientific issues in Science and Technology Instruction. Journal of Procedia Social and Behavioral Science. 9(1), 981-985.

Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta

Batubara, J. R. (2010). Adolescent development (perkembangan remaja). Sari Pediatri, 12(1), 21-9.

Brachman, R., & Levesque, H. (2004). Knowledge Representation and Reasoning.

New York (Vol. 1). http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.cs.01.060186.001351

Brickell, G., Ferry, B., & Harper, B. (2002). Developing informal reasoning skills in ill- structured environment : a case study into problem- solving strategies. 19th Annual Conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, 1 (December), 65–73.

Dahar, R. (2011). Teori-teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Bandung: Penerbit Erlangga

Dawson, V., & Venville, G. J. (2009). High‐school Students’ Informal Reasoning and Argumentation about Biotechnology: An indicator of scientific literacy?

International Journal of Science Education, 31(11), 1421–1445. http://doi.org/10.1080/09500690801992870

Evans, G. W. (2004). The environment of childhood poverty. American psychologist, 59(2), 77.-92

Gelder, T., & Bulka, A. (2000, July). Reason: Improving informal reasoning skills. In Proceedings of the Australian Computers in Education Conference.

Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s

development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Goel, V., & Dolan, R. J. (2004). Differential involvement of left prefrontal cortexin inductive and deductive reasoning. Cognition, 93(3). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.03.001

(2)

81

argumentasi pada diskusi isu sosiosaintifik mikrobiologi melalui weblog.

Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 1 (2), 168-177

Jacob, C., & UPI, J. P. M. F. (2007). Logika informal: Pengembangan penalaran logis. Laporan Hasil Penelitian Hibah Kompetitif UPI Tahun 2007.

Kelemen, D. (2004). Are children “intuitive theists”? Reasoning about purpose and design in nature. Psychological Science, 15(5), 295–301.

http://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00672.x

Kusnawa, Wowo. (2011). Taksonomi Berpikir. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya

Levinson, R. (2006). Towards a theoretical framework for teaching controversial socio‐scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 28(10), 1201-1224.Mar'at, Samsunuwiyati. (2006). Psikologi Perkembangan. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya

Margono, S. (2009). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Moleong, Lexy. (2010). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya

Nbina, J. B., & Obomanu, B. J. (2010). The Meaning of Scientific Literacy: A Model of Relevance in Science Education. Academic Leadership Journal, 8(4), 166-176.

Nuangchalerm, P., & Kwuanthong, B. (2010). Teaching “Global Warming” through socioscientific issues-based instruction. Asian Social Science, 6(8), p42.

Ohm, E. (2005). The relationship between formal and informal reasoning(Doctoral dissertation, University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon).

Ristyantoro, Rodemeus. (2012). Critical Thinking, Membangung Pemikiran Logis. Jakarta: PT. Pustaka Sinar Harapan

Sadler, T. D. (2004a). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513–536. http://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20009

(3)

82

Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). The Morality of Socioscientific Issues: Construal and Resolution of Genetic Engineering Dilemmas. Science Education,

88(1), 4–27. http://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10101

Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005a). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,

42(1), 112–138. http://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20042

Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005b). The significance of content knowledge for informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: Applying genetics knowledge to genetic engineering issues. Science Education, 89(1), 71–93. http://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20023

Sadler, T. D., & Fowler, S. R. (2006). A threshold model of content knowledge transfer for socioscientific argumentation. Science Education, 90(6), 986-1004.

Santrock, John.W. (2009). Educational Psychology. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika

Subiantoro, A. W., Ariyanti, N. A., & Sulistyo. (2013). Pembelajaran materi ekosistem dengan socio-scientific issues dan pengaruhnya terhadap reflective judgment siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 2(2), 203–208.

Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif Dan R&D. Bandung : Alfabeta

Suparno, P. (2001). Teori Perkembangan Kognitif Jean Piaget. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Testa, I. (2014) Promoting students’use of content knowledge in ssi reasoning through laboratory activities. Strand 8 Scientific literacy and socio scientific issues, 42.

Venville, G.J., & Dawson, V.M. (2010). The impact of a classroom intervention on grade 10 students’ argumenation skills, informal reasoning, and conceptual understanding of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 952-977

Waldrip, B., & Prain, V. (2012). Reasoning through representing in school science. Teaching Science, 58(4), 14-18.

Widhy, P., Nurohman, S., & Wibowo, W. (2013). Model integrated science berbasis socio scientific issues untuk mengembangkan thinking skills dalam mewujudkan

(4)

83

Woolfolk, Anita. (2009). Educational Psychology Active Learning Edition.

Yogyakarta: Penerbit Pustaka Pelajar

Yang, F. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Reasoning about science-related uncertain issues and epistemological perspectives among children. Instructional Science, 38(4), 325–354. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9084-3

Zeidler, D. L., & Nichols, B. H. (2009). Socioscientific issues: Theory and practice.

Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 49–58. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173684

Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Applebaum, S., & Callahan, B. E. (2009). Advancing reflective judgment through socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 74–101. http://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20281