• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Pengaruh Manajemen Konflik dan Job Insecurity terhadap Intensi Turnover di PT. Midi Utama Indonesia, Tbk Branch Medan

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "Pengaruh Manajemen Konflik dan Job Insecurity terhadap Intensi Turnover di PT. Midi Utama Indonesia, Tbk Branch Medan"

Copied!
141
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)
(2)

LAMPIRAN A : DATA SUBJEK

LAMPIRAN B : DATA MENTAH

LAMPIRAN C : DATA HASIL TRY OUT

LAMPIRAN D : UJI RELIABILITAS

LAMPIRAN E : UJI VALIDITAS

LAMPIRAN F : UJI ASUMSI

LAMPIRAN G : ANALISIS HASIL PENELITIAN

(3)

LAMPIRAN A : DATA SUBJEK

SUBJEK USIA MASA

KERJA

TINGKAT PENDIDIKAN

Subjek 1 19 6 SMA

Subjek 2 22 8 SMA

Subjek 3 22 3 SMA

Subjek 4 20 18 SMA

Subjek 5 19 13 SMA

Subjek 6 25 10 SMA

Subjek 7 22 24 SMA

Subjek 8 19 24 SMA

Subjek 9 20 1 SMA

Subjek 10 20 1 SMA

Subjek 11 21 2 SMA

Subjek 12 20 1 SMA

Subjek 13 21 4 SMA

Subjek 14 18 3 SMA

Subjek 15 21 1 SMA

Subjek 16 19 1 SMA

Subjek 17 23 12 SMA

Subjek 18 19 4 SMA

Subjek 19 20 6 SMA

(4)

Subjek 21 18 3 SMA

Subjek 22 20 2 SMA

Subjek 23 20 6 SMA

Subjek 24 20 12 SMA

Subjek 25 21 7 SMA

Subjek 26 20 8 SMA

Subjek 27 20 11 SMA

Subjek 28 21 12 SMA

Subjek 29 20 4 SMA

Subjek 30 19 5 SMA

Subjek 31 22 9 SMA

Subjek 32 20 7 SMA

Subjek 33 22 8 SMA

Subjek 34 24 24 SMA

Subjek 35 19 8 SMA

Subjek 36 20 11 SMA

Subjek 37 20 4 SMA

Subjek 38 20 8 SMA

Subjek 39 18 2 SMA

Subjek 40 21 8 SMA

Subjek 41 22 8 SMA

Subjek 42 24 15 SMA

Subjek 43 21 9 SMA

(5)

Subjek 45 21 4 SMA

Subjek 46 20 6 SMA

Subjek 47 20 4 SMA

Subjek 48 20 9 SMA

Subjek 49 19 7 SMA

Subjek 50 19 4 SMA

Subjek 51 19 12 SMA

Subjek 52 23 1 S1

Subjek 53 19 4 SMA

Subjek 54 19 7 SMA

Subjek 55 21 4 D3

Subjek 56 18 12 SMA

Subjek 57 22 12 SMA

Subjek 58 19 12 SMA

Subjek 59 19 12 SMA

Subjek 60 21 12 SMA

Subjek 61 21 12 SMA

Subjek 62 21 12 SMA

Subjek 63 19 6 SMA

Subjek 64 19 6 SMA

Subjek 65 21 12 SMA

Subjek 66 23 12 SMA

Subjek 67 21 8 SMA

(6)

Subjek 69 20 16 SMA

Subjek 70 20 6 SMA

Subjek 71 20 12 SMA

Subjek 72 22 11 SMA

Subjek 73 21 12 SMA

Subjek 74 22 12 SMA

Subjek 75 21 12 SMA

Subjek 76 25 24 SMA

Subjek 77 24 24 SMA

Subjek 78 23 12 SMA

Subjek 79 23 12 SMA

Subjek 80 20 6 SMA

Subjek 81 19 5 SMA

Subjek 82 23 3 SMA

Subjek 83 20 12 SMA

Subjek 84 21 12 SMA

Subjek 85 18 2 SMA

Subjek 86 22 8 SMA

Subjek 87 18 3 SMA

Subjek 88 23 3 SMA

Subjek 89 19 8 SMA

Subjek 90 19 12 SMA

Subjek 91 23 12 SMA

(7)

Subjek 93 19 8 SMA

Subjek 94 22 3 SMA

Subjek 95 21 4 SMA

Subjek 96 19 6 SMA

Subjek 97 20 12 SMA

Subjek 98 21 24 SMA

Subjek 99 20 12 SMA

Subjek 100 20 15 SMA

Subjek 101 22 2 SMA

Subjek 102 21 3 SMA

Subjek 103 18 4 SMA

Subjek 104 23 6 SMA

Subjek 105 20 12 SMA

Subjek 106 21 1 SMA

Subjek 107 19 24 SMA

Subjek 108 20 16 SMA

Subjek 109 21 12 SMA

Subjek 110 22 4 SMA

Subjek 111 20 11 SMA

Subjek 112 19 9 SMA

Subjek 113 19 12 SMA

Subjek 114 20 12 SMA

Subjek 115 21 12 SMA

(8)

Subjek 117 21 6 SMA

Subjek 118 24 12 SMA

Subjek 119 22 7 SMA

Subjek 120 20 12 SMA

Subjek 121 18 9 SMA

Subjek 122 25 5 SMA

Subjek 123 19 1 SMA

Subjek 124 22 12 SMA

Subjek 125 19 1 SMA

Subjek 126 23 11 SMA

Subjek 127 19 7 SMA

Subjek 128 20 12 SMA

Subjek 129 19 12 SMA

Subjek 130 21 1 SMA

Subjek 131 19 8 SMA

Subjek 132 18 4 SMA

Subjek 133 23 4 D3

Subjek 134 19 2 SMA

Subjek 135 23 10 SMA

Subjek 136 19 4 SMA

Subjek 137 18 7 SMA

Subjek 138 21 12 SMA

Subjek 139 21 11 SMA

(9)

Subjek 141 19 7 SMA

Subjek 142 19 3 SMA

Subjek 143 21 12 D3

Subjek 144 22 16 SMA

Subjek 145 20 12 SMA

Subjek 146 19 2 SMA

Subjek 147 18 1 SMA

Subjek 148 20 1 SMA

Subjek 149 19 12 SMA

Subjek 150 20 1 SMA

Subjek 151 21 3 SMA

Subjek 152 21 12 SMA

Subjek 153 20 7 D1

Subjek 154 22 12 SMA

Subjek 155 26 5 S1

Subjek 156 23 12 SMA

Subjek 157 21 12 SMA

Subjek 158 20 12 SMA

Subjek 159 19 8 SMA

Subjek 160 21 2 SMA

Subjek 161 25 1 S1

Subjek 162 18 12 SMA

Subjek 163 27 6 S1

(10)

Subjek 165 22 12 SMA

Subjek 166 23 12 SMA

Subjek 167 21 1 SMA

Subjek 168 18 1 SMA

Subjek 169 19 6 SMA

Subjek 170 22 16 SMA

Subjek 171 19 8 SMA

Subjek 172 22 6 SMA

Subjek 173 22 6 D3

Subjek 174 20 12 SMA

Subjek 175 20 1 SMA

Subjek 176 20 6 SMA

Subjek 177 21 5 SMA

Subjek 178 22 3 SMA

Subjek 179 22 3 SMA

Subjek 180 20 1 SMA

Subjek 181 23 4 SMA

Subjek 182 21 3 SMA

Subjek 183 24 5 D3

Subjek 184 23 24 SMA

Subjek 185 20 4 SMA

Subjek 186 19 7 SMA

Subjek 187 19 3 SMA

(11)

Subjek 189 19 2 SMA

Subjek 190 20 2 SMA

Subjek 191 18 4 SMA

Subjek 192 26 2 S1

Subjek 193 21 4 SMA

Subjek 194 20 4 SMA

Subjek 195 21 1 SMA

Subjek 196 19 14 SMA

Subjek 197 20 2 SMA

Subjek 198 20 12 SMA

Subjek 199 22 1 SMA

Subjek 200 18 1 SMA

Subjek 201 19 2 SMA

Subjek 202 22 5 SMA

Subjek 203 19 1 SMA

Subjek 204 19 12 SMA

Subjek 205 21 10 SMA

Subjek 206 22 6 SMA

Subjek 207 22 16 SMA

Subjek 208 22 4 SMA

Subjek 209 22 11 SMA

Subjek 210 21 12 SMA

Subjek 211 23 12 SMA

(12)

Subjek 213 22 7 SMA

Subjek 214 19 13 SMA

Subjek 215 25 2 SMA

Subjek 216 23 8 SMA

Subjek 217 21 24 SMA

Subjek 218 23 12 SMA

(13)

LAMPIRAN B : DATA MENTAH

Intensi Turn Over

Subjek

(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)

Manajemen Konflik

Subjek

(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)
(29)
(30)
(31)

Job Insecurity

Subjek

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

(32)
(33)
(34)
(35)
(36)
(37)
(38)
(39)
(40)
(41)
(42)
(43)
(44)
(45)

LAMPIRAN C : DATA SETELAH UJI COBA

Intensi Turn Over

Subjek

(46)
(47)
(48)
(49)
(50)
(51)
(52)
(53)
(54)
(55)

Manajemen Konflik

(56)
(57)
(58)
(59)
(60)
(61)
(62)
(63)
(64)
(65)

Job Insecurity

Subjek

(66)
(67)
(68)
(69)
(70)
(71)
(72)
(73)
(74)
(75)

LAMPIRAN D : UJI RELIABILITAS

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

(76)

VAR00006 25.8813 40.720 .566 .859

VAR00007 25.7534 39.049 .656 .853

VAR00008 25.5479 39.487 .581 .858

VAR00009 25.8721 39.653 .642 .855

VAR00010 25.3790 40.053 .561 .859

VAR00011 25.1233 38.237 .635 .854

VAR00012 25.9269 40.664 .579 .859

Scale Statistics

Mean Variance

Std.

Deviation N of Items 27.8676 47.125 6.86473 12

b. Uji Reliabilitas Skala Manajemen Konflik

Analisis 1

Case Processing Summary

N %

Cases Valid 219 100.0

Excludeda 0 .0

Total 219 100.0

(77)
(78)

VAR00015 68.9954 42.931 .328 .690

VAR00016 68.9635 42.567 .344 .688

VAR00017 68.2877 44.628 .218 .700

VAR00018 67.7123 44.986 .258 .697

VAR00019 68.5708 41.347 .486 .675

VAR00020 68.3105 42.876 .412 .684

Scale Statistics

Mean Variance

Std.

Deviation N of Items

71.9361 47.785 6.91266 20

Analisis 2

Case Processing Summary

N %

Cases Valid 219 100.0

Excludeda 0 .0

Total 219 100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure. Reliability Statistics

(79)
(80)

VAR00015 59.6849 36.740 .291 .732

VAR00016 59.6530 36.585 .291 .732

VAR00017 58.9772 37.931 .216 .738

VAR00018 58.4018 38.021 .287 .732

VAR00019 59.2603 35.010 .475 .714

VAR00020 59.0000 36.248 .419 .721

Scale Statistics

Mean Variance

Std.

(81)

c. Uji Reliabilitas Skala Job Insecurity

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

(82)

VAR00006 77.4612 63.204 .342 .672

VAR00007 75.8721 67.222 -.002 .699

VAR00008 76.7991 62.170 .417 .667

VAR00009 76.7078 62.355 .433 .666

VAR00010 76.5936 62.756 .334 .672

VAR00011 75.8356 65.606 .084 .693

VAR00012 76.0274 66.403 .063 .693

VAR00013 75.8813 66.509 .060 .692

VAR00014 76.5068 63.370 .258 .677

VAR00015 76.7945 62.925 .306 .674

VAR00016 76.8311 61.444 .458 .663

VAR00017 76.5479 64.818 .242 .679

VAR00018 76.5890 62.748 .343 .671

VAR00019 75.9863 63.775 .214 .681

VAR00020 76.2146 65.784 .102 .690

VAR00021 77.0457 64.016 .286 .676

VAR00022 76.8493 61.688 .485 .663

VAR00023 76.8813 62.243 .398 .668

VAR00024 76.9224 62.265 .397 .668

VAR00025 76.9909 62.477 .392 .668

VAR00026 75.4018 72.829 -.366 .722

(83)

VAR00028 76.2374 72.301 -.341 .719

VAR00029 76.5890 64.573 .247 .679

VAR00030 76.8995 63.201 .239 .679

Scale Statistics

Mean Variance

Std.

Deviation N of Items 79.1553 68.132 8.25420 30

Analisis 2

Case Processing Summary

N %

Cases Valid 219 100.0

Excludeda 0 .0

Total 219 100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's

Alpha N of Items

(84)
(85)

VAR00029 46.8265 70.153 .271 .838

VAR00030 47.1370 67.376 .341 .836

Scale Statistics

Mean Variance

Std.

(86)

LAMPIRAN E : UJI VALIDITAS

a. Analisis Faktor Skala Intensi Turnover

Aspek 1

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling

Adequacy. .697

Bartlett's Test of Sphericity

Approx. Chi-Square 69.006

df 3

Sig. .000

Anti-image Matrices

I1 I2 I3

Anti-image Covariance

I1 .443 -.251 -.095

I2 -.251 .394 -.182

I3 -.095 -.182 .595

Anti-image Correlation

I1 .683a -.600 -.185

I2 -.600 .649a -.376

I3 -.185 -.376 .797a

a. Measures of Sampling Adequacy(MSA)

(87)
(88)

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

a. 1 components extracted.

Aspek 2

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling

Adequacy. .655

Bartlett's Test of Sphericity

Approx. Chi-Square 38.429

df 3

Sig. .000

Anti-image Matrices

I1 I3 I11

Anti-image Covariance

I1 .674 -.088 -.283

I3 -.088 .708 -.260

I11 -.283 -.260 .571

Anti-image Correlation

I1 .675a -.127 -.456

I3 -.127 .700a -.409

(89)
(90)

I11 .867 Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

(91)

Aspek 3

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling

Adequacy. .651

Bartlett's Test of Sphericity

Approx. Chi-Square 29.700

df 3

Sig. .000

Anti-image Matrices

I2 I6 I10

Anti-image Covariance

I2 .711 -.123 -.294

I6 -.123 .783 -.231

I10 -.294 -.231 .655

Anti-image Correlation

I2 .650a -.165 -.431

I6 -.165 .711a -.322

I10 -.431 -.322 .616a a. Measures of Sampling Adequacy(MSA)

Communalities

Initial Extraction

(92)
(93)

Component Matrixa Component

1

I2 .793

I6 .741

I10 .839

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

a. 1 components extracted. Aspek 4

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling

Adequacy. .678

Bartlett's Test of Sphericity

Approx. Chi-Square 52.636

df 3

Sig. .000

Anti-image Matrices

I5 I8 I12

Anti-image Covariance

I5 .478 -.229 -.272

I8 -.229 .645 -.090

(94)
(95)

Component 1

I5 .890

I8 .802

I12 .840

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

(96)
(97)
(98)
(99)

Communalities

Initial Extraction

MK1 1.000 .513

MK4 1.000 .551

MK5 1.000 .411

MK6 1.000 .603

MK9 1.000 .619

MK10 1.000 .301

MK18 1.000 .296

MK19 1.000 .533

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

Component Matrixa Component

1 2

MK1 .624 -.352

MK4 .326 .667

MK5 .544 -.338

MK6 .332 .702

MK9 .746 -.249

(100)

MK18 .516 -.173

MK19 .486 .545

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

a. 2 components extracted.

Rotated Component Matrixa Component

1 2

MK1 .715 -.039

MK4 -.003 .743

MK5 .638 -.063

MK6 -.013 .776

MK9 .780 .107

MK10 .518 .181

MK18 .539 .073

MK19 .194 .704

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.

(101)

Component Transformation Matrix

Component 1 2

1 .897 .443

2 -.443 .897

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.

Aspek 2

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling

Adequacy. .570

Bartlett's Test of Sphericity

Approx. Chi-Square 240.194

df 28

Sig. .000

Anti-image Matrices

MK3 MK8 MK13 MK14 MK15 MK16 MK17 MK20 Anti-image

Covariance

(102)
(103)

a. Measures of Sampling Adequacy(MSA)

Communalities

Initial Extraction

MK3 1.000 .718

MK8 1.000 .523

MK13 1.000 .629

MK14 1.000 .661

MK15 1.000 .663

MK16 1.000 .536

MK17 1.000 .736

MK20 1.000 .314

(104)
(105)

MK15 .712 .394 .040

MK16 .501 .480 .233

MK17 -.312 .473 .644

MK20 .171 .527 -.085

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis. a. 3 components extracted.

Rotated Component Matrixa Component

1 2 3

MK3 .093 -.100 .836

MK8 .694 -.200 -.033

MK13 -.157 .712 .312

MK14 -.121 .370 .714

MK15 .807 -.108 .012

MK16 .711 .174 -.009

MK17 .102 .849 -.066

MK20 .418 .142 .345

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

(106)

Rotated Component Matrixa Component

1 2 3

MK3 .093 -.100 .836

MK8 .694 -.200 -.033

MK13 -.157 .712 .312

MK14 -.121 .370 .714

MK15 .807 -.108 .012

MK16 .711 .174 -.009

MK17 .102 .849 -.066

MK20 .418 .142 .345

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.

a. Rotation converged in 4 iterations.

Component Transformation Matrix

Compon

ent 1 2 3

1 .820 -.490 -.295

2 .551 .540 .636

(107)

Rotated Component Matrixa Component

1 2 3

MK3 .093 -.100 .836

MK8 .694 -.200 -.033

MK13 -.157 .712 .312

MK14 -.121 .370 .714

MK15 .807 -.108 .012

MK16 .711 .174 -.009

MK17 .102 .849 -.066

MK20 .418 .142 .345

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

(108)
(109)

JI9 -.359 .089 .750a -.066 -.156 -.049 .024 -.175 JI10 -.007 -.090 -.066 .734a -.108 -.285 -.128 .104 JI14 -.117 -.418 -.156 -.108 .685a .085 -.100 -.022 JI23 .029 -.276 -.049 -.285 .085 .673a -.198 .018 JI25 -.205 .117 .024 -.128 -.100 -.198 .653a -.634 JI24 -.018 -.015 -.175 .104 -.022 .018 -.634 .655a a. Measures of Sampling

Adequacy(MSA)

Communalities

Initial Extraction

JI1 1.000 .515

JI4 1.000 .639

JI9 1.000 .475

JI10 1.000 .444

JI14 1.000 .445

JI23 1.000 .462

JI25 1.000 .679

JI24 1.000 .652

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

(110)
(111)

JI23 .496 .464

JI25 .771 -.290

JI24 .706 -.392

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

a. 2 components extracted.

Rotated Component Matrixa Component

1 2

JI1 .713 .085

JI4 -.136 .788

JI9 .680 .113

JI10 .128 .654

JI14 .291 .600

JI23 .161 .660

JI25 .804 .179

JI24 .805 .058

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.

(112)

Component Transformation Matrix

Component 1 2

1 .837 .548

2 -.548 .837

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

(113)
(114)
(115)

Component Matrixa Component

1 2

JI2 .828 .055

JI8 .731 .244

JI15 .560 -.473

JI19 .184 .881

JI27 .764 -.159

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

a. 2 components extracted.

Rotated Component Matrixa Component

1 2

JI2 .819 .136

JI8 .703 .315

JI15 .604 -.415

JI19 .096 .895

(116)

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.

a. Rotation converged in 3 iterations. Component Transformation

Matrix

Component 1 2

1 .995 .099

2 -.099 .995

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.

Aspek 3

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling

Adequacy. .695

Bartlett's Test of Sphericity

Approx. Chi-Square 259.700

df 28

Sig. .000

(117)

JI6 JI16 JI17 JI18 JI21 JI22 JI29 JI30 Anti-image

Covariance

JI6 .828 -.109 -.072 .040 -.020 -.011 -.057 -.212 JI16 -.109 .674 -.253 .070 -.164 -.027 -.167 -.034 JI17 -.072 -.253 .758 .037 .038 -.051 -.139 -.004 JI18 .040 .070 .037 .829 -.074 -.202 -.066 -.137 JI21 -.020 -.164 .038 -.074 .754 -.186 .040 -.129 JI22 -.011 -.027 -.051 -.202 -.186 .735 -.022 -.136 JI29 -.057 -.167 -.139 -.066 .040 -.022 .843 .125 JI30 -.212 -.034 -.004 -.137 -.129 -.136 .125 .730 Anti-image

Correlation

JI6 .728a -.145 -.091 .049 -.025 -.014 -.068 -.272 JI16 -.145 .666a -.354 .094 -.230 -.038 -.221 -.049 JI17 -.091 -.354 .680a .046 .050 -.069 -.174 -.005 JI18 .049 .094 .046 .666a -.094 -.258 -.078 -.176 JI21 -.025 -.230 .050 -.094 .731a -.250 .050 -.174 JI22 -.014 -.038 -.069 -.258 -.250 .733a -.028 -.186 JI29 -.068 -.221 -.174 -.078 .050 -.028 .638a .159 JI30 -.272 -.049 -.005 -.176 -.174 -.186 .159 .695a a. Measures of Sampling

Adequacy(MSA)

(118)
(119)

7 .542 6.774 94.016 8 .479 5.984 100.000 Extraction Method: Principal

(120)

Component Matrixa Component

1 2

JI6 .542 .146

JI16 .630 .493

JI17 .488 .585

JI18 .400 -.510

JI21 .636 -.271

JI22 .640 -.357

JI29 .304 .586

JI30 .610 -.407

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis. a. 2 components extracted.

Rotated Component Matrixa Component

1 2

JI6 .334 .452

JI16 .186 .778

JI17 .019 .762

(121)

JI21 .667 .184

JI22 .723 .119

JI29 -.127 .648

JI30 .731 .061

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.

(122)

Component Transformation Matrix

Component 1 2

1 .783 .622

2 -.622 .783

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

(123)

LAMPIRAN F : UJI ASUMSI

1. Uji Normalitas

a. Intensi Turnover

Descriptive Statistics

N Mean

Std.

Deviation Minimum Maximum IntensiTurnover 219 27.8676 6.86473 12.00 56.00 ManajemenKonfl

ik 219 23.1187 4.21928 12.00 35.00

JobInsecurity 219 24.4475 5.26114 11.00 40.00

One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test

IntensiTurnover ManajemenKonflik JobInsecurity

N 219 219 219

Normal Parametersa Mean 27.8676 23.1187 24.4475

Std. Deviation 6.86473 4.21928 5.26114

Most Extreme Differences

Absolute .058 .062 .069

Positive .058 .048 .053

Negative -.055 -.062 -.069

Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .864 .920 1.020

Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .444 .366 .249

(124)

2. Uji Linieritas

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Included Excluded Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

IntensiTurnover *

ManajemenKonflik 219 100.0% 0 .0% 219 100.0%

IntensiTurnover *

(125)

Report

IntensiTurnover ManajemenKonfl

ik Mean N

Std. Deviation

12 22.0000 3 10.53565

14 23.3333 3 12.05543

15 31.5000 4 4.04145

16 30.0000 4 4.08248

17 29.5714 7 7.43544

18 32.7778 9 4.99444

19 30.0909 11 7.13379

20 28.0769 13 5.82325

21 29.9167 24 4.43226

22 31.2500 16 6.53707

23 25.6500 20 5.33385

24 27.5000 24 5.69515

25 29.7857 14 10.76446

26 25.1053 19 4.31914

27 28.8125 16 9.19579

28 25.4167 12 5.48483

29 24.7778 9 5.86894

(126)
(127)

IntensiTurnover

JobInsecurity Mean N

Std. Deviation

11 23.0000 1 .

12 18.2500 4 4.34933

13 24.2500 4 1.50000

14 19.0000 1 .

15 16.0000 2 5.65685

16 29.7500 4 2.62996

17 25.3333 3 4.61880

18 22.0000 7 5.06623

19 25.4444 9 4.53076

20 22.8333 6 7.57408

21 24.9375 16 5.67414

22 27.4706 17 4.83629

23 23.9333 15 4.84719

24 29.7143 21 6.71672

25 27.5000 18 5.64905

26 28.7778 18 5.65223

27 32.6154 13 5.65005

28 30.4706 17 5.26922

(128)
(129)

Measures of Association

R R Squared Eta Eta Squared IntensiTurnover *

JobInsecurity .406 .165 .613 .376

3. Uji Multikolinieritas

Variables Entered/Removedb Model Variables Entered

Variables

Removed Method 1 JobInsecurity,

ManajemenKonflika . Enter

(130)
(131)
(132)

Std. Residual -4.249 3.679 .000 .995 219

Stud. Residual -4.385 3.733 .000 1.006 219

Deleted Residual

-2.80171E 1

23.45352 -.01172 6.29177 219

Stud. Deleted Residual -4.583 3.851 -.001 1.017 219

Mahal. Distance .009 12.292 1.991 2.177 219

Cook's Distance .000 .416 .007 .032 219

Centered Leverage

Value .000 .056 .009 .010 219

(133)

5. Uji Autokorelasi

Model Summaryb

Model Durbin-Watson

1 1.837a

a. Predictors: (Constant), JobInsecurity, ManajemenKonflik

(134)
(135)

LAMPIRAN G : ANALISIS HASIL PENELITIAN

Analisis Regresi Sederhana Variabel Manajemen Konflik

Variables Entered/Removedb Model Variables Entered

Variables

Removed Method

1 ManajemenKonflika . Enter

a. All requested variables entered. b. Dependent Variable: IntensiTurnover

Model Summary

Model R R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the Estimate

1 .208a .043 .039 6.72954

a. Predictors: (Constant), ManajemenKonflik

ANOVAb Model

Sum of

Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

1 Regression 445.949 1 445.949 9.847 .002a

Residual 9827.211 217 45.287

Total 10273.160 218

(136)

ANOVAb Model

Sum of

Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

1 Regression 445.949 1 445.949 9.847 .002a

Residual 9827.211 217 45.287

Total 10273.160 218

b. Dependent Variable: IntensiTurnover

Coefficientsa

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t Sig.

B Std. Error Beta

1 (Constant) 35.704 2.538 14.066 .000

ManajemenKonfl

ik -.339 .108 -.208 -3.138 .002

(137)
(138)
(139)

Coefficientsa

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t Sig.

B Std. Error Beta

1 (Constant) 14.911 2.024 7.368 .000

JobInsecurity .530 .081 .406 6.548 .000

(140)
(141)

Analisis Regresi Berganda

Descriptive Statistics

Mean

Std.

Deviation N IntensiTurnover 27.8676 6.86473 219 ManajemenKonflik 23.1187 4.21928 219 JobInsecurity 24.4475 5.26114 219

Correlations

IntensiTurnover ManajemenKonflik JobInsecurity Pearson

Correlation

IntensiTurnover 1.000 -.208 .406

ManajemenKonflik -.208 1.000 -.096

JobInsecurity .406 -.096 1.000

Sig. (1-tailed) IntensiTurnover . .001 .000

ManajemenKonflik .001 . .077

JobInsecurity .000 .077 .

N IntensiTurnover 219 219 219

ManajemenKonflik 219 219 219

JobInsecurity 219 219 219

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

penambahan sabut kelapa pada media tanam kelapa sawit dan frekuensi penyiraman terhadap pertumbuhan benih kelapa sawit ( Elais Guineensis Jacq.) di pre nursery.

Analisa teknikal memfokuskan dalam melihat arah pergerakan dengan mempertimbangkan indikator-indikator pasar yang berbeda dengan analisa fundamental, sehingga rekomendasi yang

Jenis data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder.Data berupa laporan keuangan yang diperoleh dari BEI.Metode yang digunakan dalam pengumpulan data adalah metode

Aspek yang lebih ditekankan pada pengembangan desain kemasan adalah menciptakan citra yang berbeda dengan produk dari kompetitor, agar konsumen tertarik terhadap

Demikian juga halnya dengan prevalensi hipertensi, lebih tinggi pada perokok aktif (22.1% pada laki- laki dan 38.3% pada perempuan) dibandingkan pada populasi yang tidak merokok

Gambar C.1 Waktu tunak membran M1 dengan umpan 75 % (w/w) EtOH Hasil perhitungan fluks permeasi (J) selengkapnya dapat dilihat dalam tabel D.1 halaman 80 dan 81. C.5

The oral tradition concerning the myth of Gunung Kemukus makes a unique fact about the diversity that exists there. Various stories and events then not necessarily a

Pengujian pengukuran level dengan menaikkan temperatur minyak kelapadan nilai temperatur tersebut digunakan untuk menentukan nilai massa jenis minyaknya memiliki hubungan