104
Novia, 2016
PENGEMBANGAN PENALARAN ILMIAH DAN KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR KRITIS SISWA SMP PADA PEMBELAJARAN IPA TERPADU DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN MODEL LEVELS OF INQUIRY Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu| perpustakaan.upi.edu
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993).Benchmarks of
scientific literacy: Aproject 2061 report. New York: Oxford University Press.
Arikunto, S. (2013). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan, Edisi 2. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara. Berliana, Citra. (2013). Analisis Kemampuan Inkuiri Siswa SMP melalui Pembelajaran
Levels of Inquiry Model pada Topik Gerak Bumi. Skripsi. Jurusan Pendidikan
Fisika FPMIPA UPI Bandung. Tidak diterbitkan
Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in
schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science
Education, 86, 175–218.
Cresswell. (2009). Research Design, Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods
Approaches, Third Edition. SAGE publications. Thousand Oaks California
91320.
Cartono. (2007). Assesment Dalam Pembelajaran Sains. Disertasi. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
De Jong, T. & van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 179–201.
Dahar, R.W. (2006). Teori-teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Erlangga. Depdiknas. 2013. Panduan Mata Pelajaran (PMP) IPA. Jakarta: 2014
Eggen, Paul dan June Main. (2001). Developing Critical Thinking through Science. United state of America: The Critical thinking co.
Ennis, R. H. (1985). Goal for a Critical Thinking Curriculum, Developing Minds:
A Resource Book for Teaching Thinking. Virginia: ASDC.
Ennis, R.H., Millman, J. dan Tomko, N.T. (2005). Administration Manual
Cornell Critical Thinking Test. California: The Critical Thinking Co.
Fraenkel, J.R. & Wallen, N.E. (2009). How to Design and Evaluate Research in
Education. New York : McGraw-Hill.
105
Novia, 2016
PENGEMBANGAN PENALARAN ILMIAH DAN KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR KRITIS SISWA SMP PADA PEMBELAJARAN IPA TERPADU DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN MODEL LEVELS OF INQUIRY Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu| perpustakaan.upi.edu
Hidayat, R. (2012). Profil Kemampuan Berinkuiri Siswa SMP dan Hasil Belajar Siswa
Setelah Diterapkan Model Pembelajaran Levels of Inquiry. Skripsi Jurusan
Pendidikan Fisika FPMIPA UPI Bandung. Tidak diterbitkan.
Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education:
Foundations for the twentyfirst century.Science Education, 88, 28–54.
Koslowski, B. (1996).Theory and evidence: The development of scientific reasoning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lawson, A. E. (1994). Science Teaching And The Development of Thinking. California: Wadsworth Publishing Company Belmont.
Lawson, A.E. (1992). The Development of Reasoning Among College Biology
Student A Review of Research. Journal of College Science Teaching,XXI (6)
hlm. 338-346.
Lestari, A. (2014). Analisis Scientific Reasoning dalam Penerapan Pendekatan Levels
of Inquiry pada Pokok Bahasan Optik. Skripsi.Universitas Pendidikan
Indonesia.
Liliasari. (2005). Membangun keterampilan Berpikir Manusia Indonesia melalui
Pendidikan Sains. Bandung: UPI.
Maryanti, M. (2014). Penerapan Pendekatan Levels of Inquiry untuk Meningkatan
Scientific Reasoning Siswa SMP pada Pokok Bahasan Kalor. Skripsi.
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and National Science Education
Standards. A Guide for Teaching and Learning. Washington DC: National
Academy Press.
National Science Teacher Association & Association for the Education of Teacher in Science/ NSTA &AETS. (1998). Project. Retrieved December 2, 2008, from http://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=5337.
RecognizingReasoning During Inquiry Teaching, 53.
106
Novia, 2016
PENGEMBANGAN PENALARAN ILMIAH DAN KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR KRITIS SISWA SMP PADA PEMBELAJARAN IPA TERPADU DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN MODEL LEVELS OF INQUIRY Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu| perpustakaan.upi.edu
Nugraha, Gina. (2011). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Inquiry Berbantuan Simulasi Komputer untuk Meningkatkan Penguasaan Konsep Fisika pada Pokok
Bahasan Fluida Statis. Tesis. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Nuh, M. (2014). Buku Guru Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam SMP/MTs Kelas VII. Jakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Rustaman, dkk. (2007). Assesmen dalam Pembelajaran Sains. Bandung : Prisma Press. Santyasa, I Wayan. (2004). Model Problem Solving dan Reasoning sebagai Alternatif
Pembelajaran Inovatif. Surabaya: Konvensi Nasional Pendidikan Indonesia.
Stiggins, R. (1994). Student-Centered Classroom Assesment. Newyork: Macmillan College Publishing Company, Inc.
Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kombinasi. Bandung: CV.Alfabeta.
Tawil, M. (2006). Pengaruh Kemampuan Penalaran Formal terhadap Hasil Belajar
Fisika Siswa Kelas II SLTP Negeri 1 Sungguminasa. Makassar: Universitas
negeri Makassar.
Wenning, C.J. (2005). Levels of inquiry: Hierarchies of pedagogical practices and inquiry processes. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 2(3), February 2005, pp. 3-12.
Wenning, C.J. (2005). Implementing inquiry-based instruction in the science classroom: A new model for solving the impeovement-of-practice problem.
Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 2(4), pp. 9-15
Wenning, C.J. (2010). Levels of inquiry: Using Spectrum learning sequences to teach science. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 2(3), pp. 11-20.
Wenning, C.J. (2011). The Levels of inquiry Model of Science teaching. Journal of
Physics Teacher Education Online, 6(2), pp. 9-16.
Wenning, C.J. (2011).A new Model for science teaching. Journal of Physics Teacher
Education Online, 6(2), Summer 2011, pp. 1-20. Available:
http://www.phy.ilstu.edu/pte/publications/A_new_Model_for_science_ teaching.
107
Novia, 2016
