ACHIEVEMENT OF ENGLISH TEACHER
EDUCATION DEPARTMENT (PBI)
THESIS
Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirment for the degree of Sarjana
pendidikan (S.Pd) in Teaching English
By:
M Zakaria Adityawarman
(D05211014)
ENGLISH TEACHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
FACULTY OF EDUCATION AND TEACHERS TRAINING
SUNAN AMPEL STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY
SURABAYA
Language Test of UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya Toward Students’ Achievement of English Teacher Education Department (PBI), English Department, Faculty of Education and Training, State Islamic University Sunan Ampel Surabaya. Advisor: Dra. Hj. Arbaiyah Ys, M.A and Ana Nurul Laila, M.TESOL.
Key word: Predictive Validity, College Entance Language Test, Intensive Course (IC)
digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id
TABLE OF CONTENT
Page
TITLE PAGE
... i
ADVISOR APPROVAL SHEET... ii
APPROVAL SHEET ... iii
MOTTO ... iv
DEDICATION SHEET ... v
ABSTRACT... vi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ... vii
TABLE OF CONTENT... x
LIST OF APPENDIX ... xii
CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION A. Research Background ... 1
B. Research Question ... 7
C. Objectives of The Research ... 7
D. Hypothesis ... 7
E. Significance of The Research ... 10
F. Scope And Limits of The Research ... 10
G. Definition of Key Terms ... 10
4. Consequential Validity... 19
5. Face Validity ... 20
B. The Definition of Students’ Achievement... 22
C. Factors Influencing Success Learning ... 26
1. Pre-Class Experience And Backgorund Characteristics of Student... 26
a. Work Experience... 27
b. Age ... 28
c. Educational Background ... 29
d. Socio-Economic Condition And Family Situations... 30
e. Gender ... 31
2. Stage College Experience ... 32
D. Aspects Influencing Score in a Test... 34
E. Previous Study ... 37
CHAPTER III: RESEARCH METHOD A. Research Design... 40
B. Research Subject ... 40
C. Data Collection Technique... 41
D. Research Intrument ... 41
E. Data Analysis Technique ... 42
CHAPTER IV: RESEARCH FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION A. Findings... 46
digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id
2. The Result of Statistic Data Analizing Using Pearson Product Moment
through SPSS ... 52
B. Discussion ... 54
CHAPTER V: CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
A. Conclusion ... 60
B. Suggestion... 61
BIBLIOGRAPHY
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
This chapter presents the discussion of some problems related to the topic
which is studied. This chapter discusses research background, research question,
scope and limitation, objective and significant of the study, previous study and
key terms definition.
A. Research Background
College is an educational element for students after graduating from
Senior High School. Having education at college is an important thing for
young generations because college is a place where they can explore materials
and are given more chance to be active in teaching learning process in the
class.
However, college surely wants the best inputs because this process
which will determine students’ future because most people will take their carrier in the field they take at college. Then, it can be said that college
becomes students’ future determiner.
Suryabrata states that There are at least four reasons that the college
should be selective in admission test.1 First, future leaders of society should
possess necessary qualities so they can be real leaders. It is not all pre-college
students possess. College period is a place to improve and gain those
necessary qualities for the future leaders. In countries which are still growing
1
2
digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id in process such as Indonesia, the opportunity to learn in college is lack.
Therefore, the little chance to study in college must be given to the most
qualified pre-college students. Third, the selection system in college gives
opportunity to gain valuable talent human, so, the potential of valuable human
talent who join the selection at college will not be wasted. Fourth, it is known
that college education is very costly education, therefore it should be used
efficiently by possible students to get success in learning.
College Entrance Test aims to recruit and filter pre-college students
who have the academic ability to enroll in college in accordance with the
deadline set. Thus, the selection is essentially a kind of prediction, and it is
usually associated with the academic results. This is in line with Kerlinger
who explained that “there are many people who use the test for prediction purposes in order to filter and to select potential candidates that are successful
in the educational field and jobs”.2 Therefore, consideration of the test effectiveness is as a tool to predict student success after accepting to study at
college. It means that, those who are accepted because successfully gain
highest score in college entrance test, they later will more likely to show
satisfactory academic success which operationally is often expressed in the
form of a high Grade Point Average(GPA). The base of this consideration is
that the candidates who are most likely to succeed, they must be accepted,
because these are the talent human that have the right more to obtain the
opportunity to enjoy the limited higher education.
2
To filter pre-college students who will take education in the college,
there are many ways provided either by the Indonesian goverment or the
internal institution of college. From the Indonesian goverment, there are
Public College Entrance Selection Test (SBMPTN), Interests And Abilities
Exploration Test (PMDK), Pre-College Students Entrance Test Of Public
Islamic College (SPMB-PTAIN) and others. Whereas, internal institution of
university also conducts selection namelyPre-College Students Selection Test
(SPMB).3
Joshua argued that test is one of criterion for judging the excellent
education4. There are many kinds of test depending on the test purpose itself
such as evaluating purpose from what has been taught and for knowing the
qualiaty of the students. The collage entrance test is an example of a test
which has purpose to select or filter the pre-collage students then taking them
program based on the quality possessed by them. In the collage entrance test,
the pre-college students are given 3 choices program which they want to be
studied. Then, by the score they are gotten, the collage entrance test executant
will decide who are accepted and which one the suitable program for them
based on their capability.
From the explanation above, it can be infeered that the College
Entrance Test result gives significant effect toward college students, because
by their score there are gotten, they will be determined by the college whether
3
www.uinsby.ac.id taken at 23 January 2016. 4
4
digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id they are accpepted or rejected and it also will determine the program they are
going to study. Therefore, the urgensity of creating accurate tests have to be
arranged based on the a good test concept. Where, in this case, there are many
aspects that must be noticed which all of them are becoming one in validity,
reliability, practicality and authenticity test concept.5
Dealing with the explanation above that College Entrance Test can
become one of the predictors of pre-college students’ achievement, this disscussion focuses on the concept of validity where it is including into one
kind of various validity ,criterion-related evidence6. So that it is important to
know the validity of College Entrance Test toward students’ achievement, it means that if the college students got big score in College Entrance Test, they
will also achieve a big score in their academic achievement. Eventhough,
there are many aspects that influence students’ achievement in their academic, the conducting research is applied to know the quality of the
College Entrance Testto predict the students’ achievement.
The research was conducted in UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya exactly
English Teacher Education Department (PBI). SPMB qualification test is
arranged and conducted by internal institution of the college. In UIN Sunan
Ampel Surabaya, It is consisting of few materials : general science, language
competence (English and Arabic) and religion material. But, to get more
focus research, the test score is only taken from langauge competence, it is
because language matereial becomes the main criterion in acception and
5
H Douglas Brown,LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT, Principles And Classroom Practices,(London: Pearson Longman, 2003) 19
6
rejection in language program including English Teacher Education
Department (PBI). To know the level of predictive validity of the College
Entrance Testto predict the students’ achievement, the students’ achievement in first semester is becaming the measurement. The students’ achievement is only focused to the Intensive Course (IC) scores of English Teacher
Education Department (PBI) in the first semester.
The students of Teacher English Education Department (PBI) who were
received through SPMB Qualification test get a period where they are taught
by their lectures. this period is a time where the students improve their ability
in English and by the scores they were gotten in SPMB qualification test, they
were expected to be able to pass the test of Intensive Course (IC) and earn
good academic achievement.
In this research, the researcher acknowledges that there are many
aspects that influence students’ academic achievement in college. This is because college period is a period where someone explores his personality
and knowledge by many ways such as by joining intra-organization of college
or extra-organization. In this period, parents give more chance to thier
children in their social interaction. However, the researcher does not include
those aspects to the research because the purpose of conducting the research
is only to know the level of predictive validity of the College Entrance Test as
predictor of pre-college students who want to study in college especially for
6
digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id The acception and rejection system in language program including for
English Teacher Education Department (PBI) of UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya
is by accumulating all scores in 3 materials of SPMB qualification test. but,
according to the officer of UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya central office, even
the acception and rejection system is by uisng accumulating all scores in 3
materials of SPMB qualification test, the main scores to be criterion in
language program including for English Teacher Education Department (PBI)
is language test score. Therefore, this research focuses on the college entrance
language test scores. To know the level of predictive validity of the college
entrance language test is by knowing the correlation between college entrance
language test scores and Intensive Course (IC) scores of English Teacher
Education Department (PBI) in the first semester.
In other side, the researcher assumes that the students who are accepted
in English Teacher Education Department (PBI) through SPMB Qualification
test and they are gotten high scores Intensive Course (IC) score, there have
been few aspects which influence them thus they can get high scores in
Intensive Course (IC). the achievement they get, not only because the scores
they got in SPMB qualification test.
B. Research Questions
1. What is the correlation between college entrance language test of UIN
2. What is the predictive validity of college entrance language test scores
toward students’ achievement of English Teacher Education Department (PBI) ) who were accepted throgh SPMB qualification
test?
C. Objective of The Research
Seing to the research question, the objective of the research is to
see the correlation between college entrance language test of UIN
Sunan Ampel Surabaya and Students’ achievement of English Teacher Education Department (PBI) therefore the predictive validity of
college entrance language test scores toward students’ achievement of English Teacher Education Department (PBI) who were accepted
throgh SPMB qualification test will be known.
D. Hypothesis
Ary defines hypothesis as tool that is used in the research process, no
ends of research.7 It means that hypothesis is only researcher’s prediction which presents researcher’s expectations about a significant difference from variables. This research hypothesis is college entrance language test
as one of materials tested for pre- college students who want to study in
UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya becomes media to filter the qualified and the
best pre-college students especially pre-college students for English
Teacher Education Department (PBI). This test also predicts the academic
achievement of the students who are received in English Teacher
7
8
digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id Education Department (PBI) in the future after they had been gotten
teaching learning process. Therefore, the researcher assumes that students
who got high scores in college entrance language test will more likely get
high scores also in Intensive Course (IC) in the first semester,
remembering that Intensive Course (IC) is a course which focuses on the
all English skills in the first semester. So there is correlation between those
two variables where college entrance language test scores as the
independent variable and Intensive Course (IC) score is dependent
variable. The hypothesis used in this study is 2 side hypotheses.
1. Null hypothesis (H0)
The level of predictive validity of the college entrance language test is
catagorized as low correlation. It is when the result shows under 0,40
2. Alternative hypothesis (H1)
The level of predictive validity of the college entrance language test is
catagorized as high correlation. it is when the result shows more then
0,40
The more detail, the researcher in catagorizing correlation uses
guidence presented by Sugiyono,8it is below:
1.1The Guidence of Determining Correlation
R Correlation Criteria
0,00 - 0,199 Very low
0,20 - 0,399 Low
8
0,40 - 0,599 Average
0,60–0,799 Strong
0,80–1,000 Very strong
To simplify in determining the correlation between college entrance
language test scores and Intensive Course (IC) scores, the researcher
devides the guidence of determining correlation above in two kinds, low
and high. It is catagorized as low correlation when the result is under 0,40
and it is catagorized as high correlation when the result is more then 0,40.
However, in catagorizing the result, even the researcher catagorizes the
result in two kinds, the researcher constantly will explain the result
including into one of correlation criteria in the table 1.1.
E. Significant of The Reseach
The significance of this research is for the UIN Sunan Ampel
Surabaya exactly the institution handling the College Entrance Test
especially in language material, after obtaining the result of the research,
whatever the result, the institution which has role management in making
the college entrance language test in UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya will
know whether the college entrance language test has whether high or low
10
digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id So there will be evaluation in case predictive validity in the college
entrance language test.
F. Scope and Limits of The Research
This research focuses on the students’ college entrance language test score in UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya academic year 2014-2014 and
their achievement in English Teacher Education Department (PBI)
academic year 2014-2015. Student’s achievement at college is marked in the form of Study Result Script(KHS). So, to know the level of predictive
validity of the college entrance language test, the scores of the college
entrance language test will be correlated with the scores of Intensive
Course (IC) in the first semester in English Teacher Education Department
(PBI) gotten from Study Result Script (KHS). The Intensive Course (IC)
scores are taken from students who were accepted trough SPMB
Qualification test.
G. Key Terms
Below are the definitions of key terms in the research:
1. Predictive Validity: Predictive validity is the extent to which
performance on a test is related to later performance that the test was
designed to predict9. It means that, the test in college entrance
language test is for predicting the quality of pre-college students who
will be accepted in English Teacher Education Department (PBI)
whether they are able to get standard scores of pass students criterion
9
or they more likely to get high scores. For example, students
sometimes join toffle preparation class before join the real toffle test.
In the end of the class, the test is made to predict the students’ capability in joining the real toffle test. The toffle preparation test
scores is becoming the predictor variable while the scores of the toffle
test is becoming the criterion variable. It is concluded that if the tester
passes the toffle preparation test, he/she should be ready to join the real
toffle test. In other words, if the toffle preparation test scores could
predict the real toffle test scores, the toffle preparation test is claimed
to have a high level of predictive validity.
2. College Entrance Language Test of UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya: is
one of test materials conducted by internal institution of UINSA
Surabaya to filter the pre-college students.
3. Intensive Course (IC): Integrated English skills course which have 8
Credits (SKS) in the first semester in English Teacher Education
Department (PBI).
4. Student’s Achievement: “the extent to which a student has achieved their educational goals.”10
10
✁
✂✄☎ ✄✆ ✄✝✞ ✟ ✄✠✡✝✞ ☛☞ ✞ ✄ ✂y ✂✄☎ ✄✆ ✄✝✞ ✟ ✄✠✡✝✞ ☛☞ ✞ ✄✂y ✂✄☎✄ ✆✄✝✞ ✟ ✄✠✡✝✞ ☛☞ ✞ ✄✂y ✂✄☎✄ ✆✄✝✞ ✟ ✄✠✡✝y✞ ☛☞ ✞ ✄✂ ✂✄☎✄ ✆✄✝✞ ✟ ✄✠✡✝y✞☛☞ ✞ ✄✂ ✂✄☎ ✄✆✄✝✞ ✟ ✄✠✡✝y✞ ☛☞✞ ✄✂ CHAPTER II
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
In this chapter, the researcher explains the related literature of the research
consists of the definition of validity, the kinds of validity, the definition of
students’ achievement, factors influecing success learning, aspects influencing scores in a test and previous studies.
A. Validity
The term validity is frequently used in case of measurement and
testing. The definition of validity according to Fulcher is the extent to
which inferences made from assessment result are appropriate,
meaningful, and useful in terms of the purpose of the assessment1. From
the definition above, it can be concluded that to measure whether the test is
valid or not depends on the purpose of the test made. The instrument can
be categorized to have high validity if the test runs its function well or
gives the test result in accordance with the aim of the test made. So, the
test which possesses low validity will produce irrelevant data with the
purpose of the test made.
Validity as a term to determine proper test in gaining the goal made
is an important thing to do by the tester. Tester should be careful in
making a test. For example, if tester wants to measure students’ ability in making question tag, so the test result will show students’ ability in
✌
Glenn Fulcher,✍✎✏ ✑t✒ ✑✏ ✓✔ ✏ ✕ ✖✏✖✗u ✘✗st✒ ✕✖ , (Great Britian: Hodder Education, 2010) 19
making question tag. The things that will be achieved in valid test are
preciseness and accuracy.2 In another word, the test can differentiate a
small aspect of the test given. For example, if we want to measure gold
weight, we exactly must use gold measurement to gain accuracy and
preciseness result. If we use body measurement instrument in measuring
gold weight, the result will not valid because those two instruments are
different in use. The valid measurement or test has lowest error degree so
it can show the real thing of the measured or tested object.
From the explanation above, it shows that validity has two primary
characters, accuracy and preciseness. So, a test cannot be categorized as
the most valid test without seeing the test object. One test instrument
possesses high quality level to test one object. But it cannot be high quality
level in other objects. But, the valid test is not always showing the goal we
want to get, because sometimes there is other aspect that can influence the
quality of the test such as in scoring or from the people who join the test.
So, to measure the validity of the test, the way is comparing to the lattice
work made by the tester.
According to Brown, validity consists of five kinds: content-related
evidence, criterion-related evidence, construct-related evidence,
2
15
digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id
consequential validity and face validity.3The term of validity is sometimes
known as evidence. The following will discuss about each of them.
1. Content-Related Evidence
This approach measures how far the test items represents
domain or tested materials.4 To establish the content validity in
the measurement instrument, the tester must identify the whole
content that will be examined. Then the items will be chosen
randomly from the whole content which represents the
information from the all areas. By using this method, the tester
should collect carefully amount of a group which represents the
whole content.
In term of content validity, the tester tries to take the
conclusion from the test score into larger domain from the whole
content. So that, the content validity is related to the sample of a
population representativeness. Knowledge and skills covering in
the test items must represent the larger domain from knowledge
and skills. However, to make representative test of the whole
materials is difficult. For example, in the grammar class, the
grammar materials in 1 semester are consisting of tenses, passive
voice, if clause, question tag, and adjective clause. It is difficult
and near to the nonsense to make representative test of this
3
H Douglas Brown,✵ ✶✷✸ ✹✶✸ ✺✶✻✻ ✺✻✻ ✼✺ ✷✽✾✿ ❀❁ ❂ ❃❁ ❄ ❅ ❆s ✶❂❇❈ ❅ ❉ss❀❊ ❊ ❋✿❀ ❉ ❃❁ ❃❆t s ,(London: Pearson Longman, 2003) 22
grammar course materials. Content validity is usually made by
content experts. Taking a grammar course as an example again, a
test of grammar course should be written by English experts
because they know more what are important in their own
discipline.
2. Criterion-Related Evidence
When the focus of the test is on criterion validity, the tester
tries to take the conclusion from the test scores to performance. A
high score of a valid test shows that the test taker has the
performance criteria. An independent variable could be used as
a predictor variable and a dependent variable as the criterion
variable. The correlation coefficient between them is
called validity coefficients.5 Here is the researcher concern,
criterion validity. College entrance is as predictor of pre-college
students’ ability in theirfuture achievement in college.
For example, students sometimes join toffle preparation
class before join the real toffle test. In the end of the class, the test
is made to predict the students’ capability in joining the real toffle test. The toffle preparation test scores is becoming the predictor
variable while the scores of the toffle test is becoming the
criterion variable. It is concluded that if the tester passes the toffle
5
17
digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id
preparation test, he/she should be ready to join the real toffle test.
In other words, if the toffle preparation test scores could predict
the real toffle test scores, the toffle preparation test is claimed to
have a high degree of criterion validity.
The concept of validity helps us to know what the test
measures, what it intends to measure and can the results be used
to predict the future behavior of the participants. In other words, it
addresses at how well a specific assessment tool predicts the
future behavior. College entrance test or college admission test is
a test that is expected to be able to predict the success of
pre-college students in gaining good academic achievement in the
future. Pre-college students filtered based on college entrance test
results are expected to reflect the high-low ability in gaining
academic achievement. If the score of the college entrance test is
high, necessarily it will guarantee success in the future. Instead,
pre-college students who do not pass the college entrance test it is
because the test shows that they have low test scores and they will
not be able to success in the future.
As a tool of comparison of predictive validity is the scores
obtained after the pre-college students join the teaching learning
process at the college. If it proves that who has the higher score in
the college entrance test failed in the first semester exams and if
teaching learning process and they pass in the first semester
exams, so the college entrance test of the college cannot be
categorized as good predictor or has low predictive validity.
3. Construct-Related Evidence
To understand the construct validity, first, it is important to
know about what construct is. A construct is known as attribute,
proficiency, ability, or skill that processed in human brain toward
the existing theory.6 Construct validity deals with how well an
assessment, or topics within an assessment, connected with the
educational constructs that the assessment was designed to
measure.7 For example, if the construct to be measured is the
ability of the students in speaking English by oral interview, the
way how to analize the score is using several factors, fluency,
pronunciation, grammatical accuracy, vocabulary in use and socio
linguistic appropriateness. Those catagorization in analyzing the
ability in speaking English are theoretical cunstruct which is
made by the language experts as major components of oral
profiency. So if there is a teacher conducts test for speaking
ability and just evaluates only pronunciation and grammar, the
6
H Douglas Brown,❲ ❳❨❩ ❬❳❩ ❭❳❪❪ ❭❪❪ ❫❭ ❨❴❵❛ ❜❝ ❞ ❡❝ ❢ ❣ ❤s ❳❞✐❥ ❣ ❦ss❜❧ ❧ ♠❛❜ ❦ ❡❝ ❡❤t s ,(London: Pearson Longman, 2003) 25
7
19
digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id
result of the test is not valid because the construct validity of the
test made and conducted is low.
4. Consequential Validity
Language testing experts use consequential validity to refer
to the social consequences caused by particular test for a
particular purpose.8 A test considered to have consequential
validity if the test has benefits for the social life, even if some
experts assume that consequential validity is not urgent. Since, it
is excluded to the concept of validity in which focus to the
essence of the assessment itself.9
The explanation above means that, the impact of the test
takers, teachers, schools, government and the community should
be considered. According to Brown, the impact test is known as
washback (reverse impact).10 For example, the impact of the test
on learning, especially in preparation for the particular test. The
appearing of institutes tutoring, private tutoring, and books of
UAN preparation, a test preparation of CPNS test, and others are
some of phenomena of test impact. Other example, If after the
teacher certification is found institution that sells seminars
certificates, training certificates and even sell diploma, it was also
a washback of teacher certification. The thing to remember does
not mean the impact behind it is always bad, it must be able to
produce a posotive washback. If we do a formative test and find
weaknesses in the students learning or teachers teaching
weaknesses and we are trying to fix it, so the test that we are
arranged has produced positive feedback effect. In other hand, if
after following the test the students did not even change the
learning style and learning targets, and when they are tested again
the results still does not pass, the test that we developed did not
leave any impact.
5. Face Validity
In many ways, face validity offers is contradictive to
content validity, which attempts to measure how accurately
an assessment represents what it is trying to measure. The
difference is that content validity is comprehensive and specific
evaluation, whereas face validity is a more general measure.
Furthermore, the measurement is from the student who doing the
test. As an example, after a group of students did a test, the
teacher asked for feedback to decide about what good and need to
be improved in the test. This can be used as an evaluation for the
21
digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id
According to Brown face validity is classified as 'weak
evidence' supporting construct validity, but that does not mean
that it is incorrect11. For example, after doing a test, some students
would assume that the test is good because it assess the lesson
that had been explained by the teacher. However, another student
would assume that the test was too difficult. Thus, this validity
doesn’t guarantee how the quality of assessment is, but it is as a support for the other validity concept.
In fact, in the social and educational sciences, it is difficult
to measure the face validity of a test because there are so many
factors that may lay behind the one assumption such as;
background knowledge, the lesson mastery, or even the student
emotion. It is practically impossible to account for them all. So
that, face validity cannot be a single validity concept of a test
because the result can be based on the participant perspective. To
make a view about how good the test is we can send the test to a
group of colleague experts in the field, to evaluate what they think
it needs improvement. This face validity helps a teacher to find
the weakness before wasting a lot of time and money for a test.
B. The Definition ofStudents’Achievement
11
Before the disscussion about students’ achivement will be explored more, the researcher explains that the term students’ achievement is sometimes called academic achievement and learning achievement. Those
terms are same in meaning, so the researcher sometimes uses term learning
achievement and academic achievement in explaining “students’ achievement”. Achievement is always associated with the implementation of activities dealing with the objective of the class. Learning achievement
is inseparable from learning, because learning is a process, while learning
achievement is the output of the learning process. In the other word,
learning achievement is measurement to know how good the process is.
At the same time, there are some definitions of learning
achievement, for example, Winkel states that learning achievement is a
statement to the success of learning or ability students in learning activities
in accordance with the achieved weight.12 On the other hand, Kuh et al
assumes that learning achievement is the realization of potential abilities or
capacity of a person13. In school, learning achievement can be seen from
the mastery of the learning materials and objective of the class. To this
purpose, the achievement has private role in evaluating how far students
understand the material. Tools to measure achievement or learning
12
Pascarella, Tarenzini, ➋➌w College Affects Student: A Third Decade Research , (USA: PB Printing, 2005) 38
13
George D.Kuh at al,What Matters to Student Success: A Review of The Literature
23
digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id
outcomes are called achievement test developed by teachers or lecturers
who teach the subjects.
Furthermore, Tarenzini defines learning achievement involve the
mastering of cognitive, affective and psychomotor.14 Those aspects are
connected to each others which can make a standard of how student can
gain the “good” predicate.
Students’learning achievements are often presented in the form of a symbol, in the form of numbers, letters or words that tell the results
already achieved by each student in a given period. The results of the
measurement of the students include cognitive (knowledge), affective
(attitude) and psychomotor (skills) can be determined after evaluation
called achievement test.15In the university level, the learning achievement
is denoted by numbers or letters. Based on some definitions above, it can
be concluded that learning achievement is the level of capability that
students have to understand with the information obtained in the learning
process including cognitive, affective and psychomotor.
On the contrary, Pascarella argued that the success of learning
achievement tests will not always guarantee a student’s success in
14
Pascarella, Tarenzini, How College Affects Student: A Third Decade Research , (USA: PB Printing, 2005) 69
15
learning.16 It is because there are some factors that exactly involve in the
learning process. However in achievement almost only cognitive aspect
that is evaluated. To this reason, the student achievement through test may
not fully reveal complete student ability in the lesson that has been taught.
As a result, learning achievement tests may show invalid result toward
student competency. Meanwhile, according to Kuh et al, there are two
kinds of outcome learning achievement, those are: academic achievement
shown by the value (IPK) in school and (b) the economic benefits and
quality of life after graduation lecture17.
Although there are limitations in its use, Pascarella and Terenzini
and Kuh et al concluded that the academic achievement is still the best
indicator for the persistence of students, graduation rates and school
enrollment at the next level. An academic achievement in the first year is
crucial to further academic success and graduation rates, due to good
academic achievement can reduce the possibility of students dropped out
from college and increase the possibility of faster or at least on time
graduation. In addition, the benefit of an academic achievement also has a
positive effect on the probability of obtaining employment that is suitable
with the field after he graduated from college.
16
Pascarella, Tarenzini, How College Affects Student: A Third Decade Research , (USA: PB Printing, 2005)
17
25
digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id
As a fact, William and Swail found that college graduation proved to
have a better life-career than colleagues who did not earn a degree which
will influence to their financial economically.18 Furthermore, the college
graduation will have the better skill and experience than the one who do
not continue their education. As a result, the college graduation will have
better work ethos and qualification dealing with job demanded. To prove
the graduation, academic achievement is needed to make sure that he or
she is approved by the university. Moreover, through the academic
achievement the job seeker will know the qualification of the employer. In
short, academic achievement is the most valid way in measuring the
quality of the student.
C. Factors Influencing Success Learning
Kuh et al in the commission report delivered at the National
Symposium on Post secondary Student Successwith the title What Matters
to Student Success: A Review of the Literature proposed a framework for
student learning success is based on literature surveys that have been done.
Within this framework, the success of student learning (student success) is
defined as academic achievement, the students’ involvement in activities
which is aimed at education, satisfaction, acquisition of knowledge, skills,
achievement of educational goals, and performance after graduation.19
There are two factors that influence the success of learning those are:
Pre Class Experience and Background Characteristics of Students
(Pre-college Student Experience and Background Characteristic) and phase
Experience Class (College Experience), which includes the Student
Behavior, Institution Condition and Student Engagement.
1. Pre-Class Experience and Background Characteristics of Students
In the teaching learning process, teacher sometimes finds a
student who has good intensity in material given by the teacher.
Moreover, the student sometimes makes a difficult question which
the teacher never predicts before. The student pretends to master the
material given well then the others. This fact concludes that there is a
correlation between pre- class experience and background
characteristics of students. Kuh at al divides some factors in the
period of pre-college experience and student background
characteristics that influence academic achievement into four
19
27
digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id
categories: work experience, age, educational background and
socio-economic condition and family situations.20
a. Work Experience
When college students choose faculty of their education
in college that is accordance with their work, it can be
indicated that they will get better score then others in their
academic achievement because they directly apply what they
gain in the class and they can explore it in their work place. It
is proved by Research De Rue entitled "Quantity or Quality?
Work Experience as a Predictor of MBA Student Success ",
showed that the Master of Business Administration (MBA)
program must recruit students with the qualification of high
quality work experience, the work experience that requires
high responsibility and work place diversity.21
This is in contrast to research Dreher and Ryan, which
examines the relationship between work experience for
Master of Business Administration (MBA) students and the
academic achievement. The results showed that the work
experience only had small impact on academic success or
20
George D. Kuh et al,What Matters to Student Success: A Review of The Literature, Commissioned Report For The National Symposium On Postsecondary Student Success: Spearheading A Dialog On Student Success, USA, Indiana University Bloomington, July 2006 21
academic achievment in the first semester, and does not
affect the academic success of the following semester.22
b. Age
Age of a personal is assumed to have an influence on
his thinking ability. Students who are older often said to be
possess more ability in terms of basic skills which is
necessary for effective study at higher education level.
Therefore, a student who is older tended to have higher
academic achievement than students who are younger. But
test results of Richardson in his study entitled "Mature
Student in Higher Education: Academic Performance and
Intellectual Ability '' gives different conclusion about age
impact on academic achievement. He concluded that in terms
of academic performance for higher education (post graduate)
there is no sufficient evidence to guarantee the young student
will have a better academic performance than students with
older age. Differences in gender and age of the students do
not have an impact on student performance. The ages 25-29
ages is seen as the most excellent in the performance of
students, but other than that age only provide a slight
difference in affecting student achievement23.
22
George F. Dreher, Katherine C. Ryan,Prior Work Experience And Academic Achievement Among Firts-Year Mba Students.Research in higer education, august 2000, volume 41, issue 4
23
29
digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id
c. Educational Background
The educational background and participation courses
have a significant effect on academic achievement in the
exam. The experience or academic background in language at
the previous education gives significant positive effect on
student achievement of language department. It is very logic,
someone who has gotten education before going to the
college, and he or she chooses college program same with the
education before, surely his or her educational backgorund
influences the academic acievement at college.
but Trail, et al in his research entitled "Impact of Field
of Study, College and Year on Calculation of Cumulative
Grade Point Average" shows that the differences in
educational background give little effect on the academic
performance of students. The differences in educational
background affect only 1.5% of the academic achievement.24
d. Socio-Economic Condition and Family Situations
This case actually has biggest effect to the college
students’ achievement in the college. There had been many facts dealing with the collegestudents’ failure in their college
24
caused by this case. Bary in his research entitled “TheEffect of Socio-Economic Status on the Academic Achievement”
investigated the effect of family situation (family-level
factors) including the number of siblings, socio - economic
status (consisting of education, employment status and
income of parents), incomes possessed by the family and
parent involvement in their children school. The sample was
7.976 students from 752 schools. The Selection of schools
conducted by the way probability sampling of the
Educational Longitudinal Study data of 2002, which is
collected by the National Center for Education Statistics
(NCES).25
The results showed that socio-economic status gives
positive effect on the test scores, students who have a lower
socio-economic status tend to get lower test scores as well.
whereas, other results shows that the number of sibling gives
negative effect on the test scores, incomes of the family give
positive effect on the test scores, and the greater parents
involvement in their children school give a positive effect on
the test scores. In case increasing students’ concentration, something to support student success is a guarantee of
financial aid that is suitable until the student graduating from
25
31
digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id
the college, especially for the scholarship program. With this
guarantee, the students will be able to fully concentrate to the
learning activities and does not need to work after being in
college to pay college and suffice their needs and their family
needs.
e. Gender
Most researches which observe the effect of gender on
learning achievement shows that female tend to have better
academic achievement than male. In addition, female tend to
be more diligent in learning and diligently involved in extra
college activities that support the learning process, while
male prefer to join college activities that are refreshing and
sports.
Female also has nature in case a tendency to involve
and join in social relations, so in the learning, they feel
possess the obligation and responsibility to improve her
performance to reach the family expectations, teachers and
friends around her, while male tend to get his motivation to
improve performance only for his own purposes.26
2. Stage College Experience
26
George D.Kuh at al,What Matters to Student Success: A Review of The Literature
When college students begin the course in the college,
another important factor in achieving success is the involvement
of the college students toward effective educational activities.
Chikering and Gamson in a Kuh et al explained that there are
seven categories of effective educational activities that can affect
college student learning and the quality of their educational
experience. The seven categories, namely: the relationship
between students and faculty, collaboration between students,
active learning process, fast in giving feedback and accurate, time
which is used to do the homework, high expectations and
appreciate the variety of talents and ways of learning27. In
general, the college students that are more involved in those
activities, the more that they learn and possess and the more that
they are more to survive and graduate from college.
The college must help the college students in providing
interesting classroom experiences that encourage students to
spend more time and effort to the learning process and help
students to develop good study habits. It is important for
institutions to invest in supporting the academic facilities
designed for students and academic staff to work together to
increase the learning atmosphere inside and outside the classroom
in order to have a great influence on student success. Institutional
33
digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id
conditions are related to student success include: the mission of
the institution is clear and focused, high standards and
expectations for student achievement, assessment and timely
feedback, a culture of student-centered learning, peer support, the
pressure on the first year of college, respecting the diversity of
knowledge, the integration of learning and previous experience,
academic support programs tailored to meet the needs of students,
the application for subjects studied, active learning, collaboration
between students and academic staff and among students,
stressing support environment for academic work, relationships
with faculty outside the classroom.28
In addition, Campbell in his study titled Motivational
Systems Theory and The Academic Performance of College
Students examined the relationship between learning motivations,
responsive learning to environmental factors and college Grade
Point Average (GPA) of the academic achievement of 259
students in business program at Institute of Higher Education in
the Southeast United States of America. The results showed that
learning motivation, responsive learning to environmental factors
and college Grade Point Average (GPA) has positive
correlation.29
D. Aspects Influencing Score in A Test
Score in a test becomes an important thing for someone who taking a
test because score determines the test takers’ hope in joining a test. There are few aspects that can influence increasing and decreasing score in test.
Prof. Dr. Saifuddin Azwar, MA explained in his speech aspects
influencing score in test.30He divided it into 4 kinds as below:
1. In the many tests Rosser found that the true answer test questions
relating to the differences of gender are always profitable to the men
even though woman have high academic achievement. Rosser also
found that women are generally better at answering questions about
relationships, aesthetics, and the humanities, while men are more
successful in answering questions about sports, science, and
business. This conclusion is supported by the findings of previous
studies conducted by researchers of Educational Testing Service
(ETS). Dwyer reviewed gender gap from a historical perspective.
Dwyer found that among the writer’s tests generally know that gender differences can be manipulated by selecting different test
items. For example fact showed that, in a few years early
29
Michael M. Campbell,Motivation Systems Theory and The Academic Performance of College Students,Journal Of College Teaching And Learning, Volume 4, Number 7, July 2007
30
35
digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id
implementation of the SAT, men got higher scores than women on
the mathematics but women always gained higher than men on the
Verbal section. The head ofEducational Testing Service(ETS) took
a policy in balancing verbal tests in order to help men by multiplying
18 questions related to politics, business and sport on the Verbal
section. After that, men gained higher score than women whether on
the Math and the Verbal section.
2. The multiple choice format from the research conducted by ETS and
the College Board have concluded that form of multiple choices
potentially influences against women. In a study of various forms of
tests at Advanced Placement (AP) test created by ETS for the College
Board, also found that the gap scores between genders is reduced or
lost all in other forms such as answers-short and essays except in the
form of multiple-choices. Similar results were concluded from the
findings of the California Bar Exam tests and the SAT's English
Composition with Essay Test.
3. Guessing opportunities on multiple-choices test with five choices that
imposing guessing penalty, which is to reduce the score by quarter for
each wrong answer and give a score of zero for a question that is not
answered, intended to test takers who do not feel sure the answer did
not make any guesses, because speculation in the answer contains a
risk of loss score. Research shows that men tend to be braver to take
tend to answer only if they convince that their answers are correct and
tend not to guess. Unwillingness to do guessing on the test proved
negative impact on test scores.
4. Another factor influencing the gender gap is the elements that must
work quickly in response to the test. Evidence shows that women
and men have a different approach to solving the problem. In
general, women tend to view the problem as a whole, considering the
possibility of more than one correct answer and check their answers.
This approach is good for the school and in everyday life but will be
harm when facing exam because it would be very wasting time.
Various studies have found that when a test is given without any
pressure of time, the scores of women will rise sharply, while a score
of men has not changed much compared with an exam that must be
completed within a limited time.
In this research, the researcher does not measure the factors
influencing success learning and factors influencing scores in a test (point
C and D). But, the researcher has strong asssumption that students who
achieve high scores in college entrance language test, have been
influenced by factors explained in point D. The students accepted through
SPMB qualification test and achieved high scores in Intensive Course
(IC), have been passed through processing few factors in point C.
37
digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id
In this research, generally, discusses about validity test. Actually
there have been some of graduated students of UIN Sunan Ampel
Surabaya that in their thesis discussed about validity, but the difference is
in case angle or point of view and the variable and place of research focus
on. Year 2013, student of Arabic Teacher Education Department (PBA),
Salma, conducted research about validity and reliability of the college
entrance test items of UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya exactly pre-college
students selection test (SPMB) in the second SPMB qualification test, but
she focused on the items of the test, measuring whether the items of the
test can be catagoried as valid and reliable or no.
From the outside college, the research aboutAnalysis in The Level of
Predictive Validity of The College Entrance Test D-3 Program of UIN
Yogyakarta Toward Students’ Achievement of Technic Faculty Academic
Year 2012-2013. The result of this reseach showed that the level of
predictive validity between those two variables is in 0,68. It means that the
level of the college entrance test of UIN Yogyakarta toward students’ achievement of technic faculty has high predictive to the students’ achievement.
Next, the research conducted by Sahlan Rosyid, he conducted a research
untitle “Dampak Nilai Ujian Masuk Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta Terhadap Indeks Prestasi Mahasiswa Fakultas Psikologi Dan
Fakultas Agama Islam Prodi Tarbiyah Angkatan 2009”. In his reserach
Mumahammadiyah surakarta towards achievment index (IP) students of
psychology faculty and PAI academic year 2008-2009 is low, therefore,
the scores of the college entrance does not determine or predict the
achievment index (IP) students of psychology faculty and PAI academic
year 2008-2009.
The previous studies above are few samples of research focusing in
assessing the level of predictive validity of a test at college. Actually there
are many research conducted to analyze the level of predictive validity of
the other test excluding college entrance test such as national examination,
school admission test and others. It proves that evaluation in case
predictive validity has significant rule in determining the quality of the
students. Therefore, knowing the level of college entrance language test
scores in UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya towards students’ achievement of Teacher English Education Department (PBI) in the first year academic
40
➍➎➏ ➎➐ ➎➑.➒ ➎➓➔➑→.➣↔.➎➍➍➎➏ ➎➐ ➎➑.➒ ➎➓➔➑→.➣↔.➎➍➍➎➏➎ ➐➎➑.➒ ➎➓➔➑→.➣↔.➎➍➍➎➏➎ ➐➎➑.➒ ➎➓➔➑→.➣↔.➎➍➍➎➏➎ ➐➎➑.➒ ➎➓➔➑→.➣↔.➎➍➍➎➏ ➎➐➎➑.➒ ➎➓➔➑→.➣↔.➎ ➍ CHAPTER III
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
A. Research Design
This research applied a quantitative approach. Based on the purpose
of this study that the study is to explain the correlation between collage
entrance language test score and students’ achievement in the first semester in case Intensive Course (IC), this study clarifies as
nonexperimental research. Nonexperimental research is a research where
the researcher identifies variables and may look for relationship among
them but does not manipulate the variables.1 This study makes no
manipulation or control of independent variable from the researcher, thus,
it is catagorized as correlational research.
B. Research subject
The number of research subject in this research is twenty six
students. The research subject is students of English Teacher Education
Department (PBI) accepted through college entrance test or SPMB
qualification test academic year 2014-2015. The scores needed by the
researcher to answer the hipothesis are two kinds of score: the first is
college entrance language test scores of English Teacher Education
Department (PBI) Students who are received through SPMB qualification
1
↕ ➙➛➜➝ ➞➟➠ ➡ ,➢➤ ➥➦➧ ➨➩ ➫ ➥➭ ➧➤➯➧➲➳➵➳➸ ➦➩ ➺➢ ➤➻➨ ➫➩ ➸ ➥➭ ➧➤,(➼ ➽➟➾ ➚ ➜➞➪➶ ➙➠➹➘, ➴➷ ➛➬ ➜➬ ➷➮➷➜➠ ➛➱ ➛➬ ✃ 2010), 26
test and the second is their scores of Intensive Course (IC) score in the first
semester academic year 2014-2015.
C. Data collection technique
To gather the information about the object of the study, the
researcher uses documentation. The documentation is in the form of
students’ score of college entrance language test and students’ score of Intensive Course (IC) in the first semester academic year 2014-2015. The
students’ score of college entrance language test andthe students’ score of Intensive Course (IC) will be reached from central office of UINSA
Surabaya (Rektorat Office) that handles the documentation of all scores of
college entrance.
D. Research instrument
This research uses quantitative data analysis. The data collection
technique in the research is documentation. Therefore, the research
instrument in this research is documentation study guidence which is used
to list the data needed for the research. The list of data consists of primary
data and secondary data. The primary data consists of data of college
entrance language test scores academic year 2014-2015 and data of
Intensive Course (IC) scores of students of English Education department
(PBI) who were accepted through SPMB qualification test. For additional
information, the secondary data are also listed in documentary study
guidence such as range of the scoring in college entrance language test, the
42
Ö×Ø ×Ù ×Ú.Û ×ÜÝÚÞ.ßà.×ÖÖ×Ø ×Ù ×Ú.Û ×ÜÝÚÞ.ßà.×ÖÖ×Ø× Ù×Ú.Û ×ÜÝÚÞ.ßà.×ÖÖ×Ø× Ù×Ú.Û ×ÜÝÚÞ.ßà.×ÖÖ×Ø× Ù×Ú.Û ×ÜÝÚÞ.ßà.×ÖÖ×Ø ×Ù×Ú.Û ×ÜÝÚÞ.ßà.× Ö
question. Those secondary data are needed to strengthen the result of the
research.
E. Data Analysis Technique
This is the final and the most important step of the research as it will
lead the researcher to the conclusion about the data collected. For this
reason the researcher must choose the appropriate data analysis to come up
with the valid hypothesis. Considering the research project is to measure
the correlation between college entrance language test score and Intensive
Course (IC) score the researcher will use quantitative data analysis with
Pearson Product Moment correlation. According to Ary, one of the
correlation parts is prediction correlation which evaluates how the two
variables will predictively impact to another variable2. In the other word,
the bigger correlations of two variables have the bigger possibility of the
prediction will be success.
In this research the data is from the college entrance language test
score and Intensive Course (IC) score of the first semester of English
Teacher Education Department (PBI). Furthermore, the data will be
analyzed by using Pearson Product Moment correlation to see the
correlation between those two variables, with the level of significance
0,05. Here is the manual formula of Pearson Product Moment correlation.
2
44
åæç æè æé.ê æëìéí.îï.æååæç æè æé.ê æëìéí.îï.æååæçæ èæé.ê æëìéí.îï.æååæçæ èæé.ê æëìéí.îï.æååæçæ èæé.ê æëìéí.îï.æååæç æèæé.ê æëìéí.îï.æ å
analysis in educational research4. Thus, SPSS is chosen by the researcher
because it is more valid and efficience.
After the result of analizing those two scores, college entrance
language test scores and Intensive Course (IC) scores, by using SPSS 16.0
version program, the researcher then catagorizes the result whether the
correlation between those two scores is low or high. Above is the
guidence:
3.1The Guidence of Determining Correlation
R Correlation Criteria
0,00 - 0,199 Very low
0,20 - 0,399 Low
0,40 - 0,599 Averange
0,60–0,799 Strong
0,80–1,000 Very strong
To simplify in determining the correlation between college entrance
English test scores and Intensive Course (IC) scores, the researcher
devides the guidence of determining correlation above in two kinds, low
and high. It is catagorized as low correlation when the result is under 0,40
and it is catagorized as high correlation when the result is more then 0,40.
However, in catagorizing the result, even the researcher catagorizes the
result in two kinds, the researcher constantly will explain the result
4
including into one of correlation criteria in the table 1.1. The null
hypothesis is rejected or the alternative hypothesis is accepted when the
result of the SPPS version 16.0 analysis shows that the correlation between
those two scores is high, and The null hypothesis is accepted or the
alternative hypothesis is rejected when the result of the SPPS analysis
46
✧★ ✩★ ✪★ ✫.✬★ ✭✮✫✯.✰✱.★✧✧★ ✩★ ✪★ ✫.✬★✭✮✫✯.✰✱.★ ✧✧★ ✩★ ✪★✫.✬★✭✮✫✯.✰✱.★ ✧✧★ ✩★ ✪★✫.✬★✭✮✫✯.✰✱.★ ✧✧★ ✩★ ✪★✫.✬★✭✮✫✯.✰✱.★✧✧★✩★✪★✫.✬★✭✮✫✯.✰✱.★✧
CHAPTER IV
RESEARCH FINDING AND DISCUSSION
In this chapter the researcher presents and analyzes the data. The analized data
was conducted to know the quality of the college entrance language test as a tool or
media to deciding and filtering the pre–college students who want to enter and study
in English Teacher Education Department (PBI). It means that, the quality of college
entrance language test to predict the students’achievement is tested in this case. In
analyzing the data, the researcher presented the college entrance language test scores
(SPMB) and Intensive Course (IC) scores of English Teacher Education Department
(PBI) in the first semester. Then those two scores are analyzed by using Pearson
Product Moment method in gaining the result whether those two variables are
correlated or not. To know the correlation of them, the researcher uses SPSS version
16.0 program.
A. Findings
In this stage, the researcher presents the needed data to get the result of
the study. The data of this study consists of 2 data, College Entrance
Language Test scores and Intensive Course scores in one table as below: