N
I
N
O
I
S
I
C
E
D
S
’
N
A
I
R
A
N
I
M
E
S
A
F
O
L
A
Y
A
R
T
R
O
P
A
N
I
A
M
E
H
T
H
G
U
O
R
H
T
L
L
A
C
E
H
T
G
N
I
D
N
O
P
S
E
R
S
’
O
H
L
E
O
C
O
L
U
A
P
N
I
S
R
E
T
C
A
R
A
H
C
T
P
E
W
D
N
A
N
W
O
D
T
A
S
I
,
A
R
D
E
I
P
R
E
V
I
R
E
H
T
Y
B
S I S E H T E T A U D A R G R E D N U N A
s t n e m e ri u q e R e h t f o t n e m ll if l u F l a it r a P s a d e t n e s e r P
fort heDegreeo fSarjanaSastra inEngilshLetters
y B
it s e m a r P a k i R a is e r e h T a i r a
M
0 : r e b m u N t n e d u t
S 6421403 6
E M M A R G O R P Y D U T S S R E T T E L H S I L G N E
S R E T T E L H S I L G N E F O T N E M T R A P E D
S R E T T E L F O Y T L U C A F
Y T I S R E V I N U A M R A H D A T A N A S
A T R A K A Y G O Y
i
N
I
N
O
I
S
I
C
E
D
S
’
N
A
I
R
A
N
I
M
E
S
A
F
O
L
A
Y
A
R
T
R
O
P
A
N
I
A
M
E
H
T
H
G
U
O
R
H
T
L
L
A
C
E
H
T
G
N
I
D
N
O
P
S
E
R
S
’
O
H
L
E
O
C
O
L
U
A
P
N
I
S
R
E
T
C
A
R
A
H
C
T
P
E
W
D
N
A
N
W
O
D
T
A
S
I
,
A
R
D
E
I
P
R
E
V
I
R
E
H
T
Y
B
S I S E H T E T A U D A R G R E D N U N A
s t n e m e ri u q e R e h t f o t n e m ll if l u F l a it r a P s a d e t n e s e r P
fort heDegreeo fSarjanaSastra inEngilshLetters
y B
it s e m a r P a k i R a is e r e h T a i r a
M
0 : r e b m u N t n e d u t
S 6421403 6
E M M A R G O R P Y D U T S S R E T T E L H S I L G N E
S R E T T E L H S I L G N E F O T N E M T R A P E D
S R E T T E L F O Y T L U C A F
Y T I S R E V I N U A M R A H D A T A N A S
A T R A K A Y G O Y
v i
l
u
f
n
i
a
p
s
i
g
n
it
i
a
W
l
u
f
n
i
a
p
s
i
g
n
it
t
e
g
r
o
F
d
n
i
k
t
s
r
o
w
e
h
t
si
o
d
o
t
h
ci
h
w
g
n
i
w
o
n
k
t
o
n
,
t
u
B
o
f
s
u
f
f
e
ir
n
g
)
o
h
le
o
C
o
l
u
a
P
(
u
o
y
m
r
o
f
s
n
a
r
t
o
t
s
d
n
u
o
w
r
u
o
y
w
o
ll
a
t
’
n
o
D
t
o
n
e
r
a
u
o
y
e
n
o
e
m
o
s
o
t
n
i
)
o
h
le
o
C
o
l
u
a
P
(
e
v
il
a
t
s
o
m
e
r
a
e
W
e
v
o
l
n
i
e
r’
e
w
n
e
h
W
v
I
d
e
d
ci
a
t
e
t
h
i
s
u
n
d
e
r
g
r
a
d
u
a
t
e
t
h
e
s
si
t
:o
t
si
r
h
C
s
u
s
e
J
,
r
o
t
a
v
it
o
M
t
s
e
t
a
e
r
G
y
M
e
b
y
M
l
o
v
e
d
p
a
r
e
n
t
s
r
e
h
t
o
r
b
t
s
e
r
a
e
d
y
M
s
e
v
o
l
y
M
i v
S T N E M E G D E L W O N K C A
Frislty , Iwould ilke t o t hank Jesu sCh irs,t t he Greates tMoitvato rfo rme m a I n e h w s m e l b o r p y m g n i v l o s n i e m g n i p l e h d n a s g n i s s e l b s i H r o f , y a d s i h t li t n u
h e H . s i s e h t s i h t g n i o
d a sblessed meal ldayandHi sblessing neve rstopsf o rme . k
n a h
T Godf orl ovingmeuncondiitonally.
k n a h t o t e k il d l u o w I , y l d n o c e
S to my parents ,fo rthei rsuppo tr ,thei r y m k n a h t d l u o w I . e m r o f e v o l g n i d n e r e v e n r i e h t d n a , e c n e it a p r i e h t , n o it n e tt a
t n u
a and my cousin sfo rthei rsuppo tr ,advice and thei rcare when Iwa sin a I
. n o it a u ti s t l u c if fi
d also would ilket o t hank my wholefamliy fort hei rhelp and .
s i s e h t e t a u d a r g r e d n u s i h t g n i h s i n if n i tr o p p u s
h
T ridly , Iwould ilke to thank my advisor ,Advenitna Pu rtanit , S.S,. e
c n a d i u g r e h d n a e c n e it a p r e h r o f , . m u H .
M when Iwas doing my t hesi swtih so
m e l b o r p y n a
m s tha t Ihaveso fa.r Thank so much fo rh eradvicedu irng guiding g
n i o d s a w I n e h w e
m my t hesis ,Mrs .Purtanit .My big grattiudealsogoest o my o
c -adviso rDrs .Hrimawan Wjianarka ,M .Hum. who ha sgiven hi s itmet o read .s
i s e h t e t a u d a r g r e d n u y m n o k c e h c d n
a O fcourse Iwould ilket osayt hankyou so h
c u
m toallt hes ecretarys tafff o rallt hei rhe . lp
k n a h t l a i c e p s y
M goe sto my firend sGaby ,Pipiet ,Siska ,Risca ,Haryo , ,
a m m E , it p e S , li r p A , r e h t s
E and Chocofo rallt hei rsuppo tri n my study and also d
n A . e fi l l a n o s r e p y m n
i t o al lmy f irend stha t Icanno tmeniton one by one s
r e tt e L h s il g n E n i s d n e ir f y m y ll a i c e p s
ii v
k n a h t g i b y m t s a e l t o n t u b t s a l e h T . tr o p p u s s s e l d n e s i h d n a r e y a r
p i sfo rMrs .
e m g n i w o ll a r o f y li m a f s ’i t a ir ti
F ot ilvei n t hei rhousef o rsevera lnight sand also p
p u s r i e h t r o
f or tand praye r fo rme .And my l ast t hank i sfo rsomeone t ha tha s s
s e n i p p a h y m k c a b t h g u o r
b andr aisedmyhope.
ii i v
H A I M L I A Y R A K I S A K I L B U P N A U J U T E S R E P N A A T A Y N R E P R A B M E L
S I M E D A K A N A G N I T N E P E K K U T N U
a
Y ngbetrandat angand ibawahi n,is ayamahasiswaUniverstia sSanataDharma:
a m a
N :MairaTheresiaRikaPramesit a
w s i s a h a M r o m o
N :064214036
n a a k a t s u p r e P a d a p e k n a k ir e b m e m a y a s , n a u h a t e g n e p u m li n a g n a b m e g n e p i m e D
s h a i m li a y r a k a m r a h D a t a n a S s a ti s r e v i n
U ayayangbejrudu :l
A OP RTRAYALOFASEMINARIAN’SDECISIONI NRESPONDING L
L A C E H
T THROUGHTHEMAINCHARACTERSINPAULO S
’ O H L E O C
T P E W D N A N W O D T A S I , A R D E I P R E V I R E H T Y B
n a k ir e b m e m a y a s n a i k i m e d n a g n e D . ) a d a a li b ( n a k u lr e p i d g n a y t a k g n a r e p a tr e s e B
P a d a p e
k erpustakaan Universtia s Sanata Dharma hak untuk menyimpan , n a l a k g n a p k u t n e b m a l a d a y n a l o l e g n m , n i a l a i d e m k u t n e b m a l a d n a k h il a g n e m
t e n r e t n i i d a y n n a k i s a k il b u p m e m n a d , s a t a b r e t a r a c e s a y n n a k i s u b ir t s i d n e m , a t a d
p n a t s i m e d a k a n a g n it n e p e k k u t n u n i a l a i d e m u a t
a a pelru meminta i zin dar isaya
a y a s a m a n n a k m u t n a c n e m p a t e t a m a l e s a y a s a d a p e k i tl a y o r i r e b m e m n u p u a m
.s il u n e p i a g a b e s
. a y n r a n e b e s n a g n e d t a u b a y a s i n i n a a t a y n r e p n a i k i m e D
a tr a k a y g o Y i d t a u b i D
: l a g g n a t a d a
P 11J anuair 12 3 0 n
a k a t a y n e m g n a Y
h T a ir a M
x i
Y T I L A N I G I R O S ’ K R O W F O T N E M E T A T S
h t s i h t t a h t d e r a l c e d y lt s e n o h
I esis ,A Portraya lo fASeminarian’ sDecision i n s ’ o h l e o C o l u a P n i s r e t c a r a h C n i a M e h T h g u o r h T l l a C e h t g n i d n o p s e
R Byt he
t p e W d n a n w o D t a S I , a r d e i P r e v i
R ,which I havew irtten ,doe sno tcontain t he d n a s n o it a t o u q e h t n i d e ti c e s o h t t p e c x e , e l p o e p r e h t o f o k r o w e h t f o s tr a p r o k r o w
. d l u o h s r e p a p c if it n e i c s a s a , s e c n e r e f e r
, a tr a k a y g o
Y 10J anuair 12 3 0
x E L B A
T OFCONTENTS E
G A P E L T I
T ... E
G A P L A V O R P P
A ... E
G A P E C N A T P E C C
A ... E
G A P O T T O
M ... E
G A P N O I T A C I D E
D ... S
T N E M E G D E L W O N K C
A ... I
S A K I L B U P N A A T A Y N R E P R A B M E
L ... Y
T I L A N I G I R O S ’ K R O W F O T N E M E T A T
S ... S
T N E T N O C F O E L B A
T ... T
C A R T S B
A ... K
A R T S B
A ... i
ii ii i
v i v
i v
ii v
ii i v x
ii x
ii i x N
O I T C U D O R T N I : I R E T P A H
C ... .
A Backgroundoft heStudy ... .
B ProblemFormulaiton. ... .
C Objecitve soft heStudy. ... .
D Deifniitono fTerm s... 1 1 5 5 6 W
E I V E R L A C I T E R O E H T : I I R E T P A H
C ... .
A Reviewo fRelatedStudy. ... .
B Reviewo fRelatedTheo ire s... .
1 Theoryo fCharacte randCharacteirzaiton. ... .
2 Theoryo fConfilct. ... .
a Interna lConfilct. ... .
b Externa lConfilct. ... .
C Theoreitca lFramework. ... 7 7 9 9 1 1
2 1
3 1
5 1 Y
G O L O D O H T E M : I I I R E T P A H
C ... .
A Objec toft heStudy. ... .
B Approachoft heStudy... .
C Methodoft heStudy... 6 1
6 1
7 1
8 1 S
I S Y L A N A : V I R E T P A H
C ... .
A TheAuthor’ sDescirpitonaboutt heMainCharacters. ... .
1 Plia r... .
2 Pliar’ sChlidhoodF irend. ... .
B TheConfilct soft heMainCharacters. ... .
1 Pliar’ sConfilct. ... .
2 Pliar’ sChlidhoodF irend’ sConfilcts. ... .
C Porrtaya l o f A Seminairan’ s Decision in Responding the Cal l .. .. .. .. . d n e ir F d o o h d li h C r e H d n a r a li P n e e w t e b s t c il f n o C e h t h g u o r h t
0 2
0 2
0 2
3 3
7 3
7 3
2 4
4 4 N
O I S U L C N O C : V R E T P A H
i x Y
H P A R G O I L B I
B ... 52 X
I D N E P P
A ... f
o y r a m m u S e h
ii x
T C A R T S B A
I T S E M A R P A K I R A I S E R E H T A I R A
M . A Portrayal fo A Seminarian’ s
Deci ison ni Responding et C llh a Through The Main Character si Pn aulo Coelho’ sByt heRive rPiedra, ISatDownandWept .Yogyakatra :Depatrmen to f
1 0 2 , y ti s r e v i n U a m r a h D a t a n a S , s r e tt e L h s il g n
E 3.
d e lt it n e l e v o n s ’ o h l e o C o l u a P s e s s u c s i d s i s e h t e t a u d a r g r e d n u s i h
T By t he
a r d e i P r e v i
R ISa tDown and Wept. Thi snove lis i nteresitng t o discus sbecause thi sbook presentst heromanitc love between awoman and a seminairan .And i t
s n i a t n o
c the confilct s tha t porrtay how a seminairan make s a decision in ll
a c e h t g n i d n o p s e
r .
s i t s ri f e h T . y d u t s s i h t n i d e s s u c s i d e b o t s m e l b o r p e e r h t e r a e r e h
T the
t u o b a n o it p ir c s e d s ’ r o h t u
a themain characters .Thesecond problem i saboutt he s
r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h t f o s t c il f n o
c .The thrid problem is op rrtaya la semina iran in d n a r a li P n e e w t e b s t c il f n o c e h t h g u o r h t ll a c e h t g n i d n o p s e r n i n o i s i c e d a g n i k a m
d n e ir f d o o h d li h c r e
h ast hemaincharactersi nt hi snov . el
e h t d n if o t d n a a t a d e h t t c e ll o c o t h c r a e s e r y r a r b il e h t s e s u r e ti r w e h T ir o e h
t e sand r eferencesf ort hestudy .Thewrtie rusest heformailsitcapproach t o e
b app iled in thi sthesis .The wrtie r think s tha tthe formailsitc approach i s o
t e t a ir p o r p p
a thestudybecauset hewrtierf ocuse sont hei nt irnsicelement soft he l e v o n e h t m o r f n e e s e b n a c t a h t s t c il f n o c e h t d n a s r e t c a r a h c e h t e r a h c i h w l e v o n
.l e v o n e h t e d i s t u o m o r f n o it a m r o f n i l a n o it i d d a y n a t u o h ti w f l e s
ti
ti r w e h t , y d u t s e h t f o t l u s e r e h t s
A e rmake sconclusion fo rthi sstudy . y
lt s ri
F , t hemain characters i n t hi sstory a re Plia rand he rch lidhood firend .The g n i n n i g e b e h t n i n o s r e p k a e w a s i o h w r e t c a r a h c d n u o r a s a r a li P d e b ir c s e d r o h t u a
h d li h c s ’ r a li P . n o s r e p h g u o t a s e m o c e b d n a y r o t s e h t f
o oodf irendi sdescirbeda sa
. y r o t s s i h t n i n a ir a n i m e s a s i e H . n o s r e p t n a ti s e h d n a s u o ir u
c Secondl ,y thewrtie r
n i a l p x
e s abou tthe confilct so fthe main characters .Plia rha sconfilc twtih he r i
s i c e d s i h t u o b a t c il f n o c s a h d n e ir f d o o h d li h c r e h d n a , d n i
m o n. Thridl sy i abou t
e h t h g u o r h t ll a c e h t g n i d n o p s e r n i n o i s i c e d a g n i k a m n i n a ir a n i m e s a f o l a y a rt o p
. d n e ir f d o o h d li h c r e h d n a r a li P n e e w t e b s t c il f n o
c Theconfilct sbetweenPlia rand
r o t s e d i c e d n a ir a n i m e s a w o h f o l a y a rt o p e h t s w o h s d n e ir f d o o h d li h c r e
h espond
.l l a c e h
t Int heend oft hestory ,hemake sadecision whichi sagood decisionf o r .
ii i x K A R T S B A . I T S E M A R P A K I R A I S E R E H T A I R A
M A oP rtraya l o f A Seminarian’ s
ll a C e h t g n i d n o p s e R n i n o is i c e
D Through The Main Characters in Paulo s ’ o h l e o
C BytheRive rPiedra, ISa tDownandWept .Yogyakatra :Jurusan Sasrta 1 0 2 , a m r a h D a t a n a S s a ti s r e v i n U , a rt s a S s a tl u k a F , s ir g g n I 3. g n a y o h l e o C o l u a P a y r a k l e v o n h a u b e s g n a t n e t s a h a b m e m i n i s i s e T l u d u jr e
b By the Rive rPiedra , ISa tDown and Wept .Nove ltersebu tsanga t a n e r a k i ti l e ti d k u t n u k ir a n e
m noveli n imengisahkan t entang certiacintar oman it s a g u j i n i l e v o n m a l a d i d n a D . m a m i n o l a c g n a r o e s n a g n e d a ti n a w g n a r o e s a r a t n a m a m i n o l a c g n a r o e s a r a c n a k r a b m a g g n e m g n a y k il f n o k g n a t n e t n a k a ti r e c n e m p e k h a u b e s t a u b m e
m utusandalammenanggap ipanggliannya. a g it t a p a d r e
T rumusan permasalahan yang akan dibaha sdalam peneilitan i
n
i . Rumusan masalah yang petrama adalah cara pengarang menggambarkan h
o k o
t -tokoh utama. Rumusan masalah yang kedua adalah konfilk-konfilk yang a
i
d lam ioleh tokoh-tokoh utama dalam certia .Rumusan masalah yang keitga h
a l a d
a penggambaran tentang seorang calon imam dalam mengambi lkeputusan k il f n o k i u l a l e m a y n n a li g g n a p i p a g g n a n e m k u t n
u antara Plia rdan teman masa
a y n li c e
k sebagait okoh-tokohutamadalamnoveli ni.
n a k l u p m u g n e m m a l a d a k a t s u p n a it il e n e p e d o t e m n a k a n u g g n e m s il u n e P n a s a h a b m e p n a g n e d i a u s e s g n a y i s n e r e f e r n a d i r o e t i r a c n e m m a l a d n a d a t a d k it s il a m r o f n a t a k e d n e P . i n i n a it il e n e
p digunakan olehpenuil ssebaga ipendekatan a n e r a k i n i s i s e t m a l a
d dalam tesi sin ipenu il smembaha stentang unsu rintirnsik t a p a d g n a y k il f n o k n a d n a h o k o n e p h a l a d a i n i l a h m a l a d , l e v o n h a u b e s m a l a d l a s a r e b g n a y n a h a b m a t i s a m r o f n i a y n a d a a p n a t i ri d n e s u ti l e v o n i r a d n a k u m e ti d .i ri d n e s u ti l e v o n r a u l ir a d d l i s a h i a g a b e
S ar i peneilitan , penuil s merangkum kesimpulan dar i , a m a tr e p g n a Y . i n i n a it il e n e
p tokoh-tokoh utamadalamcertiai n iadalah Plia rdan g n a y g n a r o e s e s i a g a b e s r a li P n a k r a b m a g g n e m g n a r a g n e P . a y n li c e k a s a m n a m e t a r o e s e s i d a j n e m h a b u r e b d n a a ti r e c l a w a a d a p h a m e
l ng yang tangguh. Teman
u h a t n i g n i a s a r i a y n u p m e m g n a y g n a r o e s e s i a g a b e s n a k r a b m a g i d r a li P l i c e k a s a m u g a r g n a y g n a r o e s e s n a
d -ragu. Diamerupakaseorang calon i mam .Yang kedua, k il f n o k g n a t n e t n a k s a l e j n e m s il u n e
p -konfilkyangt ejrad ipadat okoh-tokohutama . a s a m n a m e t n a k g n a d e s i ri d n e s a y n n a ri k i p n a g n e d k il f n o k i a y n u p m e m r a li P .l i b m a a i d h a d u s g n a y n a s u t u p e k g n a t n e t k il f n o k i a y n u p m e m a y n li c e
k Yang
t a a s n a s u t u p e k l i b m a g n e m m a l a d m a m i n o l a c g n a r o e s n a r a b m a g i a n e g n e m a g it e k f n o k i u l a l e m a y n n a li g g n a p i p a g g n a n e
m ilk antaraPlia rdan t eman masakeclinya . n o l a c g n a r o e s a r a c g n a t n e t n a r a b m a g g n e p n a k k u j n u n e m a k e r e m a r a t n a i d k il f n o K a n e m n a d n a s u t u p e k l i b m a g n e m m a l a d m a m
i nggap ipanggliannya .Pada akhi r
a ti r e
1 I R E T P A H C
N O I T C U D O R T N I
.
A Backgroundoft heStudy
Att hef ris titmewhent hewrtie rwantst o ifndoutt hede ifniitonofl tierature , e m o s m o r f e r u t a r e ti l f o n o it i n if e d e m o s e r a e r e h T . d e s u f n o c s t e g r e ti r w e h t
il t u o b a w e i v f o t n i o p n w o r i e h t e v a h y e h T . s r o h t u
a teraturebu tactuallyt heyhave e
m a s e h
t idea. s i e r u t a r e ti
L group o f ifciton ,poem ,and plays .Mos to fltierary works e
b ir c s e
d et h reailite sof l fie .They show sadness ,happines ,s l ove ,death ,murder , t
c e lf e r y e h t s e m it e m o S . e r o m y n a m d n a , ri a f f
a wha thappen i n l fie .“Ltieraturei s e
v a h t a h t n o it a u ti s n o d e s a b e b y a m t I . e fi l n a m u h f o s h t u rt e h t o t d e t a l e
r occurred
8 9 1 , s b o c a J & t r e b o R ( ” .r u c c o r e v e n y a m h c i h w d n
a 7 :2) .Reading l tieraturecan
. d lr o w s i h t t u o b a e c n e ir e p x e d n a e g d e l w o n k r u o h c ir n e
g n i d r o c c
A to Rober tand Jacobs ,Ltierature ha srelaiton wtih human l fie. I t e h t f o n o it p ir c s e d a e b n a c e r u t a r e ti L . d n i k n a m u h f o e fi l h t u rt e h t e b ir c s e d
n o it a u ti
s tha thappens ,ha shappened ,wli lhappened ,o rneve rhappens .Someitme s e
h t s a d e s u e b n a c e r u t a r e ti
l ciritcismoft hecondiitoni nace trainera. e
r a y e h T . s e r n e g n i a m e e r h t s a h e r u t a r e ti
L ifciton ,poerty ,anddrama. They r
i e h t e v a
h o wnspecialtyt ha tmake speoplei nterested t or eadi .t I n t hist hesi ,st he l
e v o n a e z y l a n a o t s e d i c e d r e ti r
w insteado fotherl tierary work sbecausenove sli e h t d n a , m e l b o r p e h t , r e t c a r a h c e h t g n i b ir c s e d n i d e li a t e d d n a e t e l p m o c e r o m
2
n i s t c e p s a e m o s e r a e r e h T . t o l p a f o t r a p e h t n i ll it s s i y d u t s s i h t f o c i p o t e h T
. y r o t s a n i e r u t c u rt s a e k a m t a h t t o l p
a Robetr sandJ acobss tatedt hatt hereare ifve s
t n e m e l
e inasrtuctureo faplo.t I nt hei rbookenitltedFiciton :AnI ntroducitont o )
n o it i d E d n o c e S ( g n it i r W d n a g n i d a e
R , t hereareexposiiton ,compilcaiton ,cirsis , .
n o it u l o s e r d n a , x a m il
c Robe tr sand Jacob salso stated abou tthe impo trance o f .t
o l p a n i t c il f n o c
e h t ,t c il f n o c n I .t c il f n o c s i t o l p f o , e c n e s s e e h t ,t n e m e l e t n a c if i n g i s t s o m e h T
e e r g e d t s e h g i h r i e h t o t t u o t h g u o r b e r a s e s n o p s e r n a m u
h . In ti s mos t
m r o f l a t n e m e l
e ,aconfilcti st heopposiiton o ftwo people .They may ifght , r
e h t o h c a e p l e h t s il n e , e u g r
a ,and otherwise carry on thei ropposiiton . t
s i x e o s l a y a m t c il f n o
C between large rgroups ,atlhough in imaginaitve e
l b a if it n e d i e r o m e r a s l a u d i v i d n i n e e w t e b s t c il f n o c , e r u t a r e ti
l and t herefore
n i e r o
m teresitng (Robe tr sandJ acobs ,1987: )9 . 9 s b o c a J d n a s tr e b o R , e v o b a n o it a t o u q e h t m o r
F stated tha tconfilc ti sthe
n e p p a h n a c t c il f n o c e d i s e B . t o l p a n i t n e m e l e t n a tr o p m i t s o m e h t d n a e c n e s s e
g r a l n e e w t e b n e p p a h n a c t c il f n o c y r o t s a n i , e l p o e p o w t n e e w t e
b e r groups .
n e e w t e b s t c il f n o c e h t , s p u o r g r e g r a l n e e w t e b n e p p a h n a c t c il f n o c h g u o h tl A
e r o m e r f a s l a u d i v i d n
i interesitng. i a m e h t o s l a s i t c il f n o
C n elementi n asrtuctureo faploti n astory .Robetr s d
e t a t s s b o c a J d n
a aboutt hei mpo trantr oleo fconfilcti naplo.t
o w t e c n o t a h t s i t o l p a n i t n e i d e r g n i r o j a m e h t s i t c il f n o c t a h t n o s a e r e h T
, t b u o d e h T . e m o c t u o e h t t u o b a t b u o d e b y a m e r e h t , n o it i s o p p o n i e r a s e c r o f
d o r p , s e t c a r a h c e h t h ti w d e g a g n e d n a d e t s e r e t n i s e m o c e b r e d a e r e h t
fi uce s
n e t o s l a d n a y ti s o ir u
c s (ion Robe tr sandJ acobs ,1987: )9 . 9 a n i t n a tr o p m i o s s m e e s t c il f n o c , t n e m e t a t s t a h t o t g n i d r o c c
A plo tbecause the
t c il f n o
c s betweent wooppostief orce ,si ndividuals ,o rgroup scanbulidt hei nterest o
s l a d n a s r e d a e r e h t f o n o i s n e t e h t d n
y e h t e li h w n o it o m e ’ s r e d a e r e h t e c n e u lf n i n a c t c il f n o c f o e c n e t s i s x e e h t , y lt c e ri d n I
. y r o t s e h t d a e r
e h t s t n e s e r p e r l e v o n a “ , e n ir r e P y b d e t a t s s
A imtiaitononman’ sdayl fieand e
r f o e g a m i n a s r e f f o d n a y a w l a r u t a n a n i s r e n n a
m al l fie.”(Perirne ,1966: 76) ,
s a h o s l a h c i h w e fi l y r a n i d r o s ’ e l p o e p t u o b a s ll e t l e v o
n confilcts ,feeilngs ,and
e r a y e h T . y r o t s e h t f o c i p o t e h t o t g n i d r o c c a s e p y t y n a m s a h o s l a l e v o N . s m e l b o r p
, n o it c if e c n e i c s , r e ll ir h t , e c n a m o
r and many more .Every novel ha s ti s own q
i n
u uenes saccording to the authors ’way to expres sthe idea. One o fthe good s
r o h t u
a whohave rwittenmanygoodnovelsi sPauloCoelho. s
i o h l e o C o l u a
P aBraziilanauthor .Hei soneof theauthor swho wrtieal o t s
i h f o t s o M . s l e v o n t a e r g f
o novel sbecome best-selilng book sso the wrtie r t
s e b s i h f o e n o s e s o o h
c -selilng bookst o beanalyzed .Among hi sfamou snovels , s
e s o o h c r e ti r w e h
t Byt heRive rPiedra ISa tDownandWepttoanalyzef u trhe.r ,
k o o b s i
H By the Rive rPiedra ISa tDown and Wept ,i sfris tpubilshed in s
i ti e s u a c e b d e z y l a n a e b o t k o o b s i h t s e s o o h c r e ti r w e h T . 4 9 9
1 very i nteresitng
y r e v d n a k o o
b interesitngs tory .Thi sbooki sabou tas weetl oves tory andhowt he .
r a e f r e h m o r f s e l g g u rt s r e t c a r a h c n i a m
t u o b a s ll e t k o o b s i h t y lt s o
M theconfilc tof t hemain characterto ifnd thei r e
fi l f o e s o p r u
p . tIi sal ovestoryaboutt wochlidhood f irend swhowereseparated r
o
f long itmeand nowt heymee tagain t ogaint heril ove.Thewrtie r ifndsl ot so f b
a s ll e t m o d s i w e h T . l e v o n s i h t n i m o d s i
w outl ove,s acir ifce ,devoitont oGod ,and .
4
e s o o h c r e ti r w e h t , e v o b a s n o it a n i a l p x e e m o s e h t o t d e t a l e
R s toanalyzet ha t
d e lt it n e l e v o
n ByTheRive rPiedra ISa tDownandWep .tA tfert hewrtierr eadt he r
o t s e l o h
w y,t hewrtie rcanseetheconfilc tbetweenPlia randhe rchlidhoodf irend g n i d n o p s e r t u o b a n o i s i c e d a g n i k a m n i d n e ir f d o o h d li h c r e h e c n e u lf n i y ll a n if t a h t
s e b ir c s e d r o h t u a e h t w o h t u o b a g n it s e r e t n i s i r e ti r w e h T . n a ir a n i m e s a s a l l a c e h t
i h c r e h d n a r a li
P ldhood f irend i n t he wholestory .This t opicwli lbeanalyzed by .
r e ti r w e h
t I s ti interesitngt obeanalyzed . o
t s s i h t n
I ry ,Pliar i sdesc irbed a saperson who i sl ack o fcon ifdence .She s
a p e h t n i y r o t s e v o l c it a m u a rt a s a
h t ,bu tshei srtyingt obet ough .Thewrtie rwli l f
o n o it p ir c s e d e h t e v r e s b
o theautho rabou tPlia ra soneoft hemain charactersi n .
l e v o n e h
t The wrtie r also want s to know wha t happen s to Plia ra tfe r he r s
n e p p a h t a h w d n a r e h t f e l d n e ir f d o o h d li h
c when11yearsl ate rdesitnyb irngst he .
n i a g a r e h t e g o t s r e v o l
r a li P , g n i n n i g e b e h t n
I i sdescirbed a saweak person who ha sa rtaumaitc h
g u o t e b o t g n i y rt s i e h s , n e h T . t s a p e h t n i y r o t s e v o
l .11 year slate rwhen she
. r o f g n it i a w s i e h s m o h w d n e ir f d o o h d li h c r e h h ti w n i a g a s t e e
m The confilct
n i d n e ir f d o o h d li h c r e h t e e m o t n o i n i p o r e h d n e f e d o t s tr a t s r a li P n e h w s n i g e b
. d ir d a
M The confilc t happen s to he r along he r journey accompanying he r d
n e ir f d o o h d li h
c hast augh ther t o bet ough .Then, t hrough her j ourney wtih he r h
t y n a m s n r a e l e h s , r e v o
l ings .Through the journey ,Plia ralso can change he r .
n o i s i c e d s ’ d n e ir f d o o h d li h
c In t he beginning i tseem sdfiifcul tfo rPliari fshe i s .
n a ir a n i m e s a e b l li t s l li w e h d n a d n e ir f d o o h d li h c r e h y b n i a g a t f e
l Finally ,he r
n a y r a n i m e s s e v a e l d n e ir f d o o h d li h
.
B ProblemFormula iton
s ’ r e ti r w e h t f o n o it c e ri d e h t e n i m r e t e d l li w s n o it s e u q g n i w o ll o f e h T
: s i s y l a n a
.
1 Howdoest heautho rdescirbeP lia randhe rchlidhoodf irend? .
2 Wha taret heconfilct so fP lia randhe rchlidhoodf irend? .
3 How do the confilct sbetween Plia rand he rchlidhood firend p r yo rt a a a
g n i k a m n i n a ir a n i m e
s decisioni nr espondingt hecall?
.
C Objecitves oft heStudy
s a h y d u t s s i h
T three problem formulaitons ,so i talso ha sthree objecitves . t
u o d n if o t s i e v it c e j b o t s ri f e h
T how t heautho rdescirbe sthemain characters i n y
r o t s e h
t ,PauloCoelho’ sByt heRive rPiedra ISa tDown andWept .Int hi sstory d
n e ir f d o o h d li h c r e h d n a r a li P e r a s r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h
t .Thesecondobjecitvei sto
t u o d n
if theconfilct soft hemain character sin t hi sstory .Themaincharactersi n . t c il f n o c l a n r e t x e d n a l a n r e t n i e v a h , d n e ir f d o o h d li h c r e h d n a r a li P , y r o t s s i h
t The
e h t t u o d n if o t s i e v it c e j b o d ri h
t po rtaya lo fasemina iran i n making adecisioni n e
w t e b s t c il f n o c e h t h g u o r h t ll a c e h t g n i d n o p s e
r en Plia rand he rch lidhood firend . n
o i s i c e d s i h e c n e u lf n i ll i w t c il f n o c s i h
T inr esponding t hecal la saseminairan. I t e h t d n o p s e r o t n o i s i c e d a e k a m o t s a h e h n e h w n a ir a n i m e s a f o l a y a rt o p a e b n a c
.t s e ir p a e b o t ll a
6
.
D Deifni itono fTerms
e r a e r e h
T t ow termst ha tareused i n t he itlteand t heproblemformulaiton . r
e t c a r a h c : e r a y e h
T andconfilct. .
1 Character r e t c a r a h
C s aremos to tfenusedt or efe rapersoni nas toryandcharacter sare e
w s a , s t h g u o h t d n a , t c e l a i d , n o it c a r i e h t h g u o r h t d e t n e s e r p y ll a u s
u l la sby
, g n i e b n a m u h f o n o it a t n e s e r p e r s ’ r o h t u a “ n a o s l a s i r e t c a r a h c A . n o it p ir c s e d
s t c a e r l a u d i v i d n i n a w o h e n i m r e t e d t a h t s e it il a u q r e n n i e s o h t f o , y ll a c if i c e p s
t n e m n o ri v n e s i h r o r e h e p a h s o t s t p m e tt a s n o it i d n o c s u o ir a v o
t .”(Robetrs ,
9 6 9 1 : )45 .
2 Confilct
“Confilc ti sa srtuggle which grow sou to fthe interplay o ftwo opposing t
o l p a n i s e c r o
7
I I R E T P A H C
W E I V E R L A C I T E R O E H T
.
A Reviewo fRelatedStudies
a f o t n e m p o l e v e d r e t c a r a h c t u o b a s s u c s i d d n a e ti r w o s l a e l p o e p e m o S
e h t , y d u t s s i h t n I . s y a w t n e r e f fi d n i d n a s l e v o n t n e r e f fi d m o r f r e t c a r a h c n i a tr e c
w s e i d u t s r e h t o h ti w y d u t s r e h e r a p m o c l li w r e ti r
w hichhavesimliart opicwtiht he
s i h w r e ti r w e h t h ti w c i p o t r a li m i s e v a h t a h t s i s e h t o w t s e s o o h c r e ti r w e h T . r e ti r w
t u o b a s
i confilct .The fris tone i sthe undergraduate thesi sfrom Sr iSaraswat i d
e lt it n
e The Inlfuence o fConfilct sUpon the Main Characte rDevelopmen tin m
a il li W e e s s e n n e
T The Roman Sp irng o fMr .sStone .The Second one i sthe m
o r f s i s e h t e t a u d a r g r e d n
u Heirbetru s Vendykurniawan Purta enitlted The n i t n e m p o l e v e D y ti l a n o s r e P ’ s k c i H l a m a J d r a w o t s t c il f n o C f o n o it u b i r t n o C
s ’ s r e y M n a e D r e tl a
W Scorpions.
it a w s a r a S i r
S (2006 )discussed abou tthe in lfuence o fconfilct supon the t
n e m p o l e v e d r e t c a r a h c n i a
m in hert hesi senitltedTheI nlfuenceo fConfilct sUpon ’
s m a il li W e e s s e n n e T n i t n e m p o l e v e D r e t c a r a h C n i a M e h
t The Roman Sp irng o f e
n o t S .s r
M .In he rstudy ,she used a work of ltierature by Tennessee Wliilam d
e lt it n
e TheRoman Spring o fMrs .Stone. In her t hesis ,shediscussed about t he n
i a
m characte rdevelopmen twhichisi n lfuencedbyconfilct shappenedt ohe.r
t t s o m l a s i y d u t s f o s u c o f r e
H hesamewtiht hewrtier’ sstudy .Shediscussed .s
t c il f n o c f o e c n e u lf n i e h t t u o b
a Thedfiference sareont heobjec to fstudyandt he e
r a t a h t s t c il f n o
8
n i d n o p s e r n i n o i s i c e d s i h g n i k a m n i n a ir a n i m e s a e c n e u lf n
i g the call. But ,Sr i
i t a w s a r a
S explained abou t the in lfuence a f the whole confilct s toward the t
n e m p o l e v e d r e t c a r a h
c .
it a w s a r a S i r
S (2006) explained moreabout t he confilct shappened t o Mrs . t
e b t c il f n o c e h t d e n i a l p x e e h s , t c il f n o c l a n r e t x e e h t r o F . e n o t
S ween Mrs .Stone
o l o a P d n a e n o t S . s r M o s l a d n a , d n a b s u h r e h d n a e n o t S . s r M , y t e i c o s r e h d n a
) 5 3 : 6 0 0 2
( .In he rconclusion ,she stated tha tthe way Mrs .Stone solved he r .s
c it s ir e t c a r a h c r e h d e t c e f f a d e c n e ir e p x e d a h e h s t c il f n o c
t u P n a w a i n r u k y d n e V s u tr e b ir e
H r a (2011) studied abou tcontirbuiton o f t
n e m p o l e v e d y ti l a n o s r e p s ’ r e t c a r a h c n i a tr e c d r a w o t s t c il f n o
c in Watle r Dean
’ s r e y
M Scorpions .The itlteo fhist hesisi sTheContribuiton o fConfilctst oward ’
s r e y M n a e D r e tl a W n i t n e m p o l e v e D y ti l a n o s r e P ’ s k c i H l a m a
J sScorpions .Inhi s t
n e m p o l e v e d y ti l a n o s r e p e h t t u o b a d e n i a l p x e e h , y d u t
s a s the resul t o f the
. s t c il f n o
c He irbetrusf ocusedont hemaincharacter ,Jama lHicks .Heanalyzedt he lf n o c l a n r e t x e d n a l a n r e t n i e h t t u o d n u o f d n a s k c i H l a m a J f o n o it a z ir e r e t c a r a h
c ict s
e H . s k c i H l a m a J f
o alsodiscussedaboutt her oleo fconfilctsi nt hedevelopmen t e
z y l a n a e H . y ti l a n o s r e p r o s c it s ir e t c a r a h c s ’ r e t c a r a h c n i a tr e c f
o d the role o f
. t n e m p o l e v e d y ti l a n o s r e p s ’ r e t c a r a h c a n i s t c il f n o c
e e w t e b y ti r a li m i s a s i e r e h t h g u o h tl
A nhi sstudy andt hewrtier’ sstudy ,bu t e h t d n a , y d u t s e h t f o t c e j b o e h t , y d u t s e h t f o h c a o r p p a e h t n i t n e r e f fi d e r a y e h t
g n i s u y b t n e m p o l e v e d y ti l a n o s r e p e h t n o d e s u c o f y d u t s s ’ a rt u P . y d u t s e h t f o s u c o f
r e ti r w e h t r e h t e h w h c a o r p p a l a c i g o l o h c y s
y d u t s s i h n I . h c a o r p p a c it s il a m r o
f Purta analyzed the interna lconfilct sand s
t c il f n o c l a n r e t x
e fo the main characte rwho i sJama lHicks .In he rstudy ,the r e h d n a r a li P e r a o h w s r e t c a r a h c n i a m o w t f o s t c il f n o c e h t d e z y l a n a r e ti r w
i h
c ldhoodf irend.
. t c il f n o c t u o b a d e s s u c s i d s i s e h t s ’i t a w s a r a S d n a s i s e h t s ’ a rt u P h t o B
y e h t , y d u t s s ’ r e ti r w e h t h ti w d e r a p m o
C discus sabou tthe in lfuence o fconfilc t t
n e m p o l e v e d y ti l a n o s r e p d n a t n e m p o l e v e d r e t c a r a h c d r a w o
t .In he rstudy ,the
s e if i c e p s r e ti r
w the confilc t tha t in lfuence sthe decision o fa seminairan in r e t c a r a h c s ’ r a li P t u o b a n i a l p x e o s l a r e ti r w e h t h g u o h tl A . ll a c e h t g n i d n o p s e r
, t n e m p o l e v e
d tii snott hemainpoin toft hiss tudy.
.
B Reviewo fRelatedTheories
o t s e ir o e h t e m o s s e il p p a r e ti r w e h
T explain and answe r the problem
: e r a s e ir o e h t e h T . s n o it a l u m r o f
.
1 Theoryo fCharacterandCharacteriza iton
e r u t a r e ti l f o k r o w a f o s t n e m e l e c i s n ir t n i c i s a b e h t f o e n o s a s r e t c a r a h C
m a r b A . e g a s s e m a g n ir b y ll a u s
u s in hi sbook ,A Glossaryo fLtieraryTermssays o h w , k r o w e v it a r r a n r o c it a m a r d a n i d e t n e s e r p s n o s r e p e h t “ e r a s r e t c a r a h c e h t t a h t
d n a , l a n o it i s o p s i d , l a r o m h ti w d e w o d n e g n i e b s a r e d a e r e h t y b d e t e r p r e t n i e r a
. o d y e h t t a h w y b d n a y a s y e h t t a h w n i d e s s e r p x e e r a t a h t s e it il a u q l a n o it o m e
0 1
n i s d o o W d n a r e g r e b r h o
R Reading and Wriitng abou tLtieraturestatet ha t t
t p e c c a t s u m s r e d a e r e h t t a h t o s e l b i d e r c e b t s u m s r e t c a r a h
c hem a sbeilevable
: 1 7 9 1 ( e l p o e
p 20) . Atlhough the characte r i s a ifcitona l character , the a
b y ll a u s u s i c it s ir e t c a r a h
c sedon t her ea lpersoni nt hewo lrd. I n othe rword ,st he .
y ti l a e r n i g n i e b n a m u h f o n o it a ti m i e h t e r a s r e t c a r a h c
t li u b s i r e t c a r a h c t a l F . r e t c a r a h c t a lf d n a r e t c a r a h c d n u o r e b n a c r e t c a r a h C
o h ti w d n a e n il t u o n i d e t n e s e r p d n a y ti l a u q r o a e d i e l g n i s a d n u o r
a u tmuch
e l g n i s a n i d e b ir c s e d y l e t a u q e d a y lr i a f e b n a c o s d n a , s li a t e d g n i z il a u d i v i d n i
n i x e l p m o c s i r e t c a r a h c d n u o r , e li h W . ) 1 2 : 1 8 9 1 , s m a r b A ( . e s a r h p r o e c n e t n e s
. y lr a l u c it r a p e lt b u s h ti w d e t n e s e r p e r s i d n a n o it a v it o m d n a t n e m a r e p m e t
w o r i e h t e v a h e l p o e
P n way sto descirbing the characteirsitc so fa cetrain .
y r o t s e h t n i r e t c a r a h
c In thei rbook enitlted Ltierature fo rComposiiton :Essay , ,
a m a r D d n a , y r t e o P , n o it c i
F Sylvan Barnet ,WliilamBu tro ,and WliilamE .Cain c
t e k s r e t c a r a h c a h tr o f g n it t e s t u o b a l l e
t h anddescirbing someperson i nt hestory . l e v o n e h t n i r e t c a r a h c a g n i b ir c s e d n i s y a w t c n it s i d r u o f d e t a t s o s l a y e h T . l e v o n r o
: e r a y e h T
.
a TheCharacter’ sSpeechandThought
e h t f o t x e t n o c l a t o t e h t r o n o it a u ti s e h t r e d i s n o c d l u o h s s r e d a e r e h T
A . t n e m e t a t
s personmigh tchangef romadespai irngpersoni ntoabette ronef rom g n i s s e r p e d y a s t h g i m r e t c a r a h c g n ir i a p s e d A . s e h c e e p s e h t f o t n e m p o l e v e d e h t
e h t e t a c i d n i d l u o h s s e h c e e p s ,t l u s e r a s A . d n e e h t n i s g n i h t y p p a h t u b t s ri f t a s g n i h t
c a r a h c e h t f o n o it c e lf e
.
b TheCharacter’ sAciton
, s s e n k a e w l a n g i s w o h s y a m s n o it c a e h t t a h t d n if l li w s r e d a e r e h T
. n o it c a s ’ r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h t h g u o r h t e r u t a m d n a , g n o rt s n e v e r o , y t s e n o h s i d
.
c TheOthe rCharacter sWhoSayabou tThem e
m it e m o s , e fi l n i s a , s e ir o t s n
I peoplet alk abou tothe rpeople .Theopinion e h t r o s c it s ir e t c a r a h c e h t d n a t s r e d n u o t s r e d a e r e h t p l e h l li w s r e t c a r a h c r e h t o m o r f
.r e t c a r a h c n i a tr e c a f o y ti l a n o s r e p
.
d TheOthe rCharacters ’Aciton
r e t c a r a h c n i a tr e c f o s c it s ir e t c a r a h c e h t d n if n a c s r e d a e r e h
T from t he othe r
.r e t c a r a h c t a h t o t t s a rt n o c n i e r a h c i h w n o it c a ’ s r e t c a r a h c
y fi t n e d i o t d e s u e b n a c s y a w e s o h
T andt o ifnd ou tthecharacterisitc so facetrain .
r e t c a r a h c
.
2 Theoryo fConfilct
e b l li w y r o t s e h T . y r o t s r o l e v o n a n i t c il f n o c a s y a w l a s i e r e h
T meaningles s
o n s i e r e h t fi y r o t s o n e k il l e e f l li w l e v o n A . y r o t s t a h t n i t c il f n o c o n s i e r e h t fi
e l g g u rt s a s i t c il f n o c “ t a h t d e t a t s n a m l o H . s u o n o t o n o m e b l li w t I . ti n i t c il f n o c
f o y a l p r e t n i e h t f o t u o s w o r g h c i h
w twoopposingf orcesi naplot” (Holman ,1960: y r o t s e h t n i t c il f n o c A . l u f g n i n a e m d n a g n it s e r e t n i y r o t s a e k a m l li w t c il f n o C . ) 8 1 1
n i n e p p a h l li w t a h w w o n k o t y ti s o ir u c d n a n o it a n i g a m i ’ s r e d a e r e h t p o l e v e d n a c
. d n e y r o t s e h t li t n u y r o t s e h t d a e r o t o s l a d n a y r o t s e h t f o d n e e h t
a h t s e t a t s n a m l o
H t“Confilcti st hemajo rpar to fal lplotsi nl tierarywork .sI t t i r o f , y r o t s a s a e n o b k c a b e h t s i ti e c n i s t o l p f o s t n e m e l e t n a tr o p m i e h t f o e n o s i
f o s t n e m e l e e h t s e d i v o r
2 1
a n i e l o r t n a tr o p m i n a s a
h story .I ti san impo tran taspec tin a story .Arp and t
e t a t s y e h T . t c il f n o c t u o b a n o i n i p o n w o r i e h t e v a h n o s n h o
J hei ropinion i n t hei r
d e lt it n e k o o
b Perrine’ sLtierature :Structure ,Sound ,andSense( TenthEdiiton) .I t ,
t a h t d e t a t s s i
,r e v e w o h , y li r a n i d r O
“ both the surface exctiemen trequried in commercia l e m o s f o t u o e s ir a n o it c if y r a r e ti l n i d n u o f g n i n a e m t n a c if i n g i s e h t d n a n o it c if
t c il f n o c f o t r o
s – a clash o facitons ,ideas ,desries ,o rwill .s”(Arp and ,
n o s n h o
J 2009:104) a t a h t d e t a t s n o s n h o J d n a p r
A confilc ti sa dispute in acitons ,ideas ,desries ,o r .
ll i
w Theyalsoexplainabou texterna lconfilc tand i nterna lconfilct .Theysayt ha t ,
n o s r e p f o p u o r g r o n o s r e p r e h t o t s n i a g a t c il f n o c e v a h n a c r e t c a r a h c
a pysica l
t t s n i a g a t c il f n o c r o , y t e i c o s , e r u t a
n heenvrionment .Theconfilc tcan bephysical , .l
a r o m r o , l a n o it o m e , l a t n e m
d e lt it n e k o o b r e h n i e n ir r e P o t g n i d r o c c
A Storyand Structure ,shesayst hat , l a c i s y h p t s n i a g a , n a m t s n i a g a t c il f n o c n i e b n a c l e v o n e h t n i r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h t “
a f r o y t e i c o s , e r u t a
n te ,and t he confilc tagains thi sown nature such a sphysical , :
6 6 9 1 , e n ir r e P ( ” l a r o m r o , l a n o it o m e , l a t n e
m 59) .From Perirne’ sstatement ,the :
e r a y e h T . y r o t s a n i t c il f n o c f o s d n i k o w t e r a e r e h t t a h t s e d i c e d r e ti r w
.
a Interna lConfilct
s i t c il f n o c l a n r e t n
I a confilc tbetween a characte rand hersel/fhimsel fto n o s r e p a , e fi l e u rt n I . o d o t s t n a w e h / e h s t a h w e d i c e d o t r o e s o p r u p s i h /r e h h c a e r
l a o g s i h /r e h g n i h c a e r n i s s e c o r p n i s i e h / e h s e li h w s m e l b o r p y n a m t n o r f n o c l li w
s r e h h ti w t c il f n o c e v a h l li w e h / e h s d n
a el/fhimsefl .She/hewli lbei nacompilcated .l
, r a li P , r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h t n e h w n e e s e b n a c l e v o n s i h t n i t c il f n o c l a n r e t n I e k a t o t s t n a w e h s r e h t e h w e s o o h c o t n o it a u ti s t l u c if fi d a n i s
i a irsk o rnot .She
s i s d n e ir f d o o h d li h c r e h d n a r e h n e e w t e b e v o l e h t t a h t s k n i h t e h S . d e s u f n o c s t e g s e v o l ll it s e h s tr a e h t s e p e e d r e h n i t u b d o o h d li h c r i e h t n i s s e n h s il o o f n a h t e r o m t o n e v o l s ’ d n e ir f d o o h d li h c r e h h ti w n i a tr e c n u s l e e f l li t s o s l a e h S . m i
h to her .Shei s
. y l s u o ir e s ti t u o b a s k n i h t e h s fi t r u h g n i e b f o d i a r f a .
b Externa lConfilct
f o e d i s l a n r e t x e e h t t s n i a g a s r e t c a r a h c e h t f o t c il f n o c a s i t c il f n o c l a n r e t x E t c il f n o c e h t g n i d u l c n i y t e i c o s d n a e r u t a n t s n i a g a t c il f n o c s a h c u s , s e v l e s m e h t e h t g n o m
a characters .The meaning and the complextiy o fthe externa lconfilc t a o t e r u s s e r p s e v i g t a h t t c il f n o c l a n r e t x e e h t ,t u B . t c il f n o c l a n r e t n i e h t m o r f e m o c .s e g n a h c d n a s e c i o h c l a n r e t n i e k a m o t r e t c a r a h c ri f e h T . s t c il f n o c l a n r e t x e f o s d n i k l a r e v e s e r a e r e h
T s tone i sthe confilc t
r e t c a r a h c a n e e w t e
b and t henature .She/hecanno twin agains tnaturebecauset he t u b e t a d a o t o g l li w n a m g n u o y a : e l p m a x e r o F . d e ti m il s i g n i e b n a m u h f o r e w o p a c e b t c il f n o c a e b l li w e r e h T . m r o t s d a b a s i e r e h t e s u a c e b o g t o n n a c e
h usei none
r e v o l s i h e k a m o t t n a w t o n s e o d e h d n a e t a d e h t o t e m o c o t s t n a w e h e d i s . y a w s i h s k c o l b m r o t s e h t e d i s r e h t o e h t n i t u b , d e t n i o p p a s i d t c il f n o c a y ll a u s u , n o s r e p r e h t o n a t s n i a g a e l g g u rt s e h t s i e n o d n o c e s e h T . t s i n o g a t n a d n a t s i n o g a t o r p n e e w t e
b Fo rexample :a couple want sto have an a s i e r e h t o s , p i h s n o it a l e r ri e h t h ti w s e e r g a s i d s t n e r a p r i e h t f o e n o t u b , t n e m e g a g n e e h t s i t c il f n o c l a n r e t x e f o d n i k t s a l e h T . t n e r a p e h t d n a e l p u o c e h t n e e w t e b t c il f n o c : y t e i c o s e h t d n a r e t c a r a h c a n e e w t e b t c il f n o
4 1
d o o g a d a h s a h d n a , k n u r d a g n i e b p o t s o t , e g n a h c o t s e d i c e d e h n e h t t u b , k n u r d
. e g n a h c r e v e n d n a k n u r d a s y a w l a s i e h t a h t s k n i h t ll it s y t e i c o s e h t n e h t t u b , b o j
t c il f n o c f o e l o r e h t t u o b a d e t a t s s b o c a J d n a s tr e b o
R in aplot .Confilct sand
. t o l p f o t n e m e l e t n a tr o p m i e h t d n a e c n e s s e e h t s i t c il f n o C . d e t a r a p e s e b t o n n a c t o l p
. t o l p a f o e r u t c u rt s a n i t c il f n o c f o n o it i s o p e h t w o h s o s l a s b o c a J d n a s tr e b o
R In
d e lt it n e k o o b r i e h
t Ficiton :An Introduciton to Reading and Wriitng (Second )
n o it i d
E ,Robe tr sandJacob sstated ifveelementsi n t hesrtuctureo faplo.t They :
e r a
.
1 Exposiiton n o it i s o p x
E i sthe ealry descirpiton abou tthe characters ,the backgrounds , .
e r u t a r e ti l f o k r o w e h t n i s l a ir e t a m e h t d n
a tI i s ilke t hei nrtoduciton oft he .
y r o t s e h t f o n o it a u ti s e h t d n a r e t c a r a h c .
2 Compilcaiton
t c il f n o c e h t t r a p s i h t n I . y r o t s a n i t c il f n o c g n i n n i g e b e h t s i n o it a c il p m o C
e h t f o t e s n o e h t r o y r o t s e h t n i t c il f n o c r o j a m e h t f o t e s n o e h t s ii t I . s tr a t s
i n o g a t n a e h t ,t r a p s i h t n I . t o l
p s tand t he protagonis tshows t heri i dea sand .s
e u l a v .
3 C irsis
d e n e p p a h s a h t a h w n e e w t e b s e t a r a p e s tI . y r o t s a n i t n i o p g n i n r u t e h t s i s i s ir C
.t a h t r e tf a n e p p a h l li w t a h w d n
a C irsisi san aciton t o r esolvet heconfilc.tI t i
n if o t n o i s i c e d a e b n a c y ll a u s u s
.
4 Cilmax x a m il
C ist het op oft heaciton . tIi st hehight ension oft heconfilct . tIi st he r
o h t u a n a , tr a p s i h t n I .t c il f n o c e h t f o n o it c a p o
t set sallt her es toft heaciton .
y l m ri f .
5 Resoluiton ,o rDénouement n o it c a f o t e s a s i n o it u l o s e
R stha twillt aket hestoryt ot heconclusionoft he .
y r o t s e l o h
w Int hi spatrt heconfilc tha smett hedecision andsoluiton .Tha t .
y r o t s e l o h w e h t f o n o i s u l c n o c a o t n i m e h t g n ir b l li w
o c t u o b a g n i s s u c s i d e s u a c e b t o l p t u o b a y r o e h t e m o s s t u p o s l a r e ti r w e h
T nfilc t
.t o l p t u o b a g n i s s u c s i d h ti w d e t a r e p e s e b t o n n a
c Confilc tha sani mpo trantr olei na g n i e e s t u o h ti w y r o t s a f o t c il f n o c t u o b a s s u c s i d t o n n a c e w , o S . t o l p a f o e r u t c u rt s
. y r o t s t a h t n i t o l p a f o e r u t c u rt s e h t
.
C Theoreitca lFramework
e v o b a s e ir o e h t e h
T areusedt oanswert heproblemf ormulaitoni nt hiss tudy . a g n i b ir c s e D n i s y a W t n e r e f fi D r u o F t u o b a y r o e h t t s ri f e h t s e s u r e ti r w e h T
r a li P f o s c it s ir e t c a r a h c e h t n i a l p x e o t l e v o N e h t n i r e t c a r a h
C and he rchlidhood
d n e ir
f a sthe main characters in this .The second theory i sabou tthe Theory o f t
c il f n o
C .Thist heory i sused t o i ndicatet heconfilc twhich i sundergoneby Plia r d
n e ir f d o o h d li h c r e h d n
a along t eh i rjourney .They ge tinterna lconfilc tand o
i s i c e d s ’ n a ir a n i m e s a y a rt r o p l li w t a h t t c il f n o c l a n r e t x
16
I I I R E T P A H C
Y G O L O D O H T E M .
A Objec toft heStudy
d e lt it n e l e v o n a s i y d u t s e h t f o t c e j b o e h
T Byt heRive rPiedra ISa tDown t
p e W d n
a .Theo irgina litlteoft henoveli sNa margem de iro Piedra eusente ie i
e r o h
c .The o irgina lversion i s i n Po truguese l anguage .I twa sfris tpubilshed i n n i e k r a l C . R n a l A y b n o i s r e v h s il g n E o t n i d e t a l s n a rt s a w l e v o n e h T . 4 9 9 1 n i li z a r B
y li a d a e k il m r o f e h t n i s i r e t p a h c e h t d n a s e g a p 0 8 1 f o s t s i s n o c l e v o n e h T . 6 9 9 1
a s u o m a f a s i e H . o h l e o C o l u a P s i l e v o n s i h t f o r o h t u a e h T . y r a i
d utho rwhowrtie s
e h s e m it e m o S . e g a u g n a l l u fi t u a e b a n i y r o t s h c a e e t o r w e H . s k o o b t a e r g y n a m
. ) 5 0 0 2 , i p a s s a H ( m s il o b m y s d n a , e s o r p c it e o p , s d r o w d o o g e m o s s t u p
e d o i R f o y ti c e h t n i 7 4 9 1 n i n r o b s a w o h l e o C o l u a P r o h t u a n a il i z a r B e h T
a c i d e d e r o f e B . o ri e n a
J itng his l fie completely t o l tierature ,he worked as t hearte y n a m r o f s c ir y l g n o s e t o r w o h l e o C . t s il a n r u o j d n a t s i c ir y l , r o t c a d n a r o t c e ri d
s i h t e Y . e e L a ti R d n a a n i g e R s il E s a h c u s , c i s u m n a il i z a r B n i s r e m r o fr e p s u o m a f
ll e w t s o
m -knownworkha sbeendonewtihRau lSeixas .Togethert heywrotes uch s
e s s e c c u
s a sEu nasc ihá de zmi lano satrás( Iwa sbornt ent housand year sago) , l a u ti ri p s e h t h ti w n o it a n i c s a f s i H . s g n o s 0 6 r e h t o t s g n o m a , e n o p a C l A d n a a ti G
d e ll e v a rt e h n e h w , s y a d e i p p i h s i h o t k c a b s e t a d t s e u
q the wo lrd l earning abou t
e i c o s t e r c e
s ites ,o irentalr eilgions ,etc .
. k o o b y r a i d s ’ r a li P e k il s i l e v o n s i h t e s u a c e b r a li P s i l e v o n s i h t f o r e t n e c e h T
s ll i b e h t y a p y l e r u s l li w t a h t r e e r a c e n a d n u m a n o s e s u c o f o h w t n e d u t s a s i r a li P
f a s o t r e h r e v u e n a m d n
s i r a li P n e h W . s d r a c t s o p d n a s r e tt e l h g u o r h t r a li P h ti w t c a t n o c n i s p e e k e h , e n o g
r a n i m e s a t a t e e m o t r e h s k s a d n e ir f d o o h d li h c r e h , s e i d u t s r e h n o d e s u c o f y lr e tt u
Z n i s e v il r a li P . a n o l e c r a B r a e
n aragoza .A tfe rtha tmeeitng ,Plia rget smany t a h T . d n e ir f d o o h d li h c r e h h ti w y e n r u o j r e h g n o l a s e ir o t s d n a s e c n e ir e p x e
n i e g n a h c f o y ti li b i s s o p e h t n e p o d n a t h g u o h t r e h e c n e u lf n i s e ir o t s d n a s e c n e ir e p x e
h n e e w t e b t c il f n o c e m o s s a h r a li P , y r o t s s i h t n I .r e
h e rmindandhe rhear.t
e h t t u o b a e z y l a n a l li w r e ti r w e h t , s i s y l a n a e h t n
I impo trance o fPliar’ s
r e t c a r a h c r e h d r a w o t s t c il f n o
c development.I nt hestory ,Plia rha smanyconfilct s s ’ r a li P e g n a h c l li w t c il f n o c e s o h t d n A . tr a e h r e h d n a d n i m r e h h ti w
r e t c a r a h
c izaitonf romweaki ntot ough.
.
B Approachoft heStudy
e h t e z y l a n a o t h c a o r p p a c it s il a m r o f s e s u r e ti r w e h t , l e v o n e h t e z y l a n a o T
s i h c a o r p p a c it s il a m r o f t a h t s k n i h t r e ti r w e h T . e v o b a d e t a l u m r o f m e l b o r p
. n o it a l u m r o f m e l b o r p e h t e z y l a n a o t h c a o r p p a e t a ir p o r p p
a Formailsitcapproach i s
k r o w e h t g n i w e i v d n a g n i d a e r y b e r u t a r e ti l f o k r o w a e z y l a n a o t y a w e h t
r o t c a f c i s n ir t n I . ti f o r o t c a f c i s n ir t x e e h t t u o h ti w f l e s ti k r o w e h t r o y ll a c i s n ir t n i
h c n i a m e h t s a r a li P f o t c il f n o c l a n r e t n i e h t t u o b a s i r e ti r w e h t y b d e s
u aracter .
y l n o r e ti r w e h t , h c a o r p p a c it s il a m r o f e h t g n i s u k r o w y r a r e ti l a g n i z y l a n a n I
o t s e s o o h c r e ti r w e h t y d u t s s i h t n i ,f l e s ti k r o w y r a r e ti l e h t r o t x e t e h t n o s e s u c o f
d e lt it n e k o o b s i h n i n ir e u G . L d e r fl i W y b d e t a t s s A . l e v o n a e z y l a n
a AHandbook
f
o Criitca lApproache so fLtierature ,when analyzing a l tierary work ,wedo no t
8 1 t o n o d l li t s e w , s t x e t n o c r e h t o m o r f w o n k e w s s e l n U . m e o p a d a e r e v a h e W h t ,r o h t u a e h t f o e m a n e h t w o n
k enaitonaltiy ,ort heeraoft hecomposiiton . e W . r e k a e p s e h t f o x e s e h t n e v e t o n , s i r e k a e p s e h t o h w w o n k t o n o d e W l a e r a s n r e c n o c m e o p e h t fi w o n k t o n o
d -lfie stiuaton o ra t otally ifcitve l a e r r a li m i s e m o s k o o t r o h t u a e h t r e h t e h w w o n k t o n o d e W . e n
o - il fe
a o t n i e t u m s n a rt d n a d e t p a d a n e h t e h s r o e h t a h t t n e d i c n i r o n o it a u ti s ( .. .. .f l e s ti m e o p e h t y l n o w o n k e w . m e o
p Gueirn ,1999 :7 3)
r e h t o e h t r o f d e t n e s e r p e r s a h t i , e l p m a x e e h t s a m e o p a s e s o o h c n ir e u G h g u o h tl A l p m a x e e h t f o e n o s i m e o p A . s k r o w y r a r e ti
l e .Themain poin i swhen weanalyze k r o w e h t t s u j s i w o n k e w t a h w , h c a o r p p a c it s il a m r o f e h t g n i s u k r o w y r a r e ti l a . k r o w y r a r e ti l e h t f o s t n e m e l e c i s n ir t n i e h t d n a f l e s ti s i h t n I . y d u t s e h t f o c i p o t e h t e z y l a n a o t e t a ir p o r p p a s i h c a o r p p a s i h T r w e h t , y d u t
s tie rwantst o analyzet hecharacte rdevelopmen to fPlia rast hemain s ’ o h l e o C n i r e t c a r a h
c Byt he Rive rPiedra ISa tdown and Wept .Thewrtie rwli l . r a li P f o t c il f n o c l a n r e t n i e h t g n i v r e s b o y b t n e m p o l e v e d s c it s ir e t c a r a h c e h t e z y l a n a w t e b t c il f n o c s a h r a li
P een he rmind and he rhear tand the externa lconfilc t r e t c a r a h c r e h t o e h t d n a r a li P n e e w t e b . f o s t n e m e l e c i s n ir t n i e h t e z y l a n a o t d e s u e b n a c h c a o r p p a s i h
T ltierature.I n
s c it s ir e t c a r a h c e h t e z y l a n a o t h c a o r p p a s i h t e s u l li w r e ti r w e h t , y d u t s s i h
t o fPliar
r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h t s
a and also the confilc thappen sto P lia rin the story .Thi s o t e t a ir p o r p p a s i h c a o r p p
a beused t o analyzet het opicoft hestudy which i sstli l .s c it s ir e t c a r a h c d n a t o l p e r a h c i h w e r u t a r e ti l f o s t n e m e l e c i s n ir t n i e h t o t d e t a l e r .
C Methodoft heStudy
l e v o n e h t s a w y d u t s s i h t n i e c r u o s y r a m ir
p By t heRive rPiedra, ISa tSown and t
p e
W rw ittenbyPauloCoelho .Thes econdarys ource sweref roms omebooks ,and .
l e v o n e h t f o s i s y l a n a e h t o t d e t a l e r d n a d e d e e n e r e w h c i h w m s i c it ir c
s e ir o e h t e m o s n i a t n o c t a h t s k o o b e r a r e ti r w e h t y b d e s u e r a t a h t s k o o b e h T
.s i s y l a n a s ’ r e ti r w e h t t r o p p u s n a c t a h
t The wrtie rneed ssome book swhich are e h t n i r e w s n a e h t n i a l p x e o t s k o o b e m o s o s l a d n a y d u t s e h t f o c i p o t e h t o t d e t a l e r
. s i s y l a n
a Toanswert hequesitonsi n t heproblemf ormulaiton, t hewrtie r ifnd sou t t
e r a s f o o r p e h T . fl e s ti l e v o n e h t m o r f s f o o r p e m o
s hestatementf romt hecharacte r d n a , r o h t u a e h t m o r f n o it a r r a n e h t ,s r e t c a r a h c r e h t o m o r f s t n e m e t a t s e h t ,f l e s r e h
r f o s l
a omt heaciton soft hecharacte rwhicharedescirbedbyt heautho .r e t s t s ri f e h T . s i s e h t s i h t g n it ir w n i s p e t s l a r e v e s k o o t r e ti r w e h
T p, t hewrtie r
’ o h l e o C o l u a P , l e v o n e h t d a e
r sByt heRive rPiedra ISa tDown andWept ,ast he g n i d n a t s r e d n u e h t t e g o t s e m it l a r e v e s l e v o n e h t d a e r r e ti r w e h T . e c r u o s y r a m ir p
y r o t s e h t f
o and t hef ocu soft hestudy .Thesecondstep,t he wrtierf ound outt he e
h t e z y l a n a o t h c a o r p p a e l b a ti u s e h t d n a n o it a l u m r o f m e l b o r
p study .The thrid
d n a s e ir o e h t f o s k o o b e m o s d n u o f r e ti r w e h t , p e t
s ciritcismt os uppo tri nanalyzing o
t g n i y rt s a w r e ti r w e h t ,
