S KIM 1201726 Bibliography

(1)

Hanifah Kurnia Muchtar, 2016

PROFIL MISKONSEPSI SISWA SMA PADA MATERI LARUTAN ELEKTROLIT DAN NONELEKTROLIT MENGGUNAKAN TES DIAGNOSTIK TWO-TIER MULTIPLE CHOICE BERBASIS PIKTORIAL

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

174

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Abadzivor, H. E. (2006). Assessment of Pictorial Materials in Ghanaian Pre-School Education (A Case Study in Kumasi Metropolis). (Tesis), Faculty of Fine Art, University of Science and Technology, Kumasi.

Adesoji, F.A. (2008). “Investigating gender difficulties and misconceptions in inorganic chemistry at the senior secondary level”. International Journal of African and African American Studies. 7(1), 1-7.

Amro, H.J., Mundy, M.A & Kupczynski, L. (2015) . “The effects of age and gender on student achievement in face-to face and online college algebra classes”. Research in Higher Education Journal. 27, 1-22.

Arikunto, S. (2015). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan Edisi 2. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.

Artdej, R. dkk. (2010). “Thai grade 11 students’ alternative conceptions for acid

-based chemistry”. Research in Science and Technological Education. 28(2), 167-183.

Barke, H.D. dkk. (2009). Misconception in chemistry. Berlin: Springer.

Bayrak, B.K. (2013) . “Using two-tier test to identify primary students’ conceptual understanding and alternative conceptions in acid base”. Mevlana International Journal of Education . 3(2), 19-26.

Brady, J.E., Jespersen, N.D & Hyslop, A. (2012). Chemistry The Molecular Nature of Matter. United States of America : John Wiley and Sons Inc.

Brown, T.L. dkk. (2012). Chemistry The Central Science. United States of America: Prentice Hall.

Calik, M. (2005). “A cross-age study of different perspectives in solution chemistry from junior to senior high school”. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 3, 671-696.

Calik, M. dan Ayas, A. (2005). “A comparison of level of understanding of eighth-grade students and science student teachers related to selected chemistry concepts”. Journal of Research and Science Teaching. 42(6), 638-667.

Candrawati, D. (2014). Profil Model Mental Siswa Pada Materi Kesetimbangan Kimia Dengan Menggunakan TDM-Two-Tier. (Skripsi), FPMIPA, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.

Carney, R.N dan Levin, J.R. (2002). “Pictorial illustrations still improve students’

learning from text”. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 5-26.

Chandrasegaran, A.L., Treagust, D.F. & Mocerino, M. (2007) . “The development of a two-tier multiple-choice diagnostic instrument for evaluating secondary

(2)

175

Chang, R. (2005). Kimia Dasar Konsep-Konsep Inti Edisi Ketiga. Jakarta : Erlangga.

Coe, A. dan Jasien , P.G. (1999) . “An investigation of electrolyte solutions using

a simple conductivity apparatus”. Springer-Verlag New York Chemistry Educator . 4, 171-172.

Dahar, R.W. (2006). Teori-Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta : Penerbit Erlangga.

Depdiknas. (2007). Tes Diagnostik. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Manajemen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah, Direktorat Pembinaan Sekolah Menengah Pertama.

Devetak, I. dan Glazar, S.A. (2009) . “The influence of 16 year old students’ gender, mental abilities and motivation on their reading and drawing

submicrorepresentations achievements”. International Journal of Science Education . 32(12) , 1561-1593.

Devetak, I. dkk. (2004). “Submicroscopic representations as a tool for evaluating

students’ chemical conceptions”.Acta Chemistry Slovakia. 51, 799-814. Devetak, I., Vogrinc, J & Glazar, S.A. (2009). ”Assessing 16-year-old students’

understanding of aqueous solution at submicroscopic level”. Acta Chemistry Slovakia. 39, 157-179.

Dewi, E.P. (2015). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik Two Tier Berbasis Piktorial Untuk Mengidentifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Pada Materi Asam Basa. (Skripsi), FPMIPA, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.

Firman, H. (2013). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Kimia. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Hasanah, N.A. (2015). Profil Miskonsepsi Siswa Kelas XI Pada Materi Larutan Penyangga Menggunakan Tes Diagnostik Multiple Choice. (Skripsi), FPMIPA, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.

Imam, A dan Singh, G.P. (2015). “Influence of gender and familial factor’s on mathematics achievement of secondary school students”. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Studies. 2, 50-57.

Ismayanti, E.M. (2015). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik Two Tier Berbasis Piktorial Untuk Mengidentifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Pada Materi Gaya Antar Molekul. (Skripsi), FPMIPA, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.

Jansoon, N., Coll, R.K & Somsook, E. (2009). “Understanding mental models of dilution in thai students”. International Journal of Environmental dan Science Education. 4(2), 147-168.

Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. “Arti Kata Profil”. [Online]. Tersedia: http://kbbi.co.id/arti-kata/profil. Diakses 4 Juni 2016.

Krause, S.J., Isaacs, O. & Sodeye. (2013). “The effect of a visually –based

(3)

176

Mudjijanti, F. (2011). “Pengaruh tes masuk berdasarkan nilai ujian nasional (UN) terhadap prestasi belajar siswa”. Jurnal Fakultas Ilmu Psikologi Universitas Katolik Widya Mandala Madiun. 2, 19-31.

Naah, B. M. dan Sanger M. J. (2012). “Student misconceptions in writing balanced equations for dissolving ionic compounds in water”. Chemistry Education Research And Practice. 13, 186–194.

Nakhleh, M. B. (1992). “Why some students don’t learn chemistry”. Journal of Chemistry Education. 69(3), 191-196.

Nyachwaya, J.M. dkk. (2011). “The development of an open-ended drawing tool: an alternative diagnostic tool for assesing students understanding of the particulate nature of matter”. Journal of Chemistry Education Research and Practice. 12, 121-132.

Rahmawati, T. (2014) . Profil Miskonsepsi Siswa SMA Pada Materi Hidrokarbon Menggunakan Tes Diagnostik Pilihan Ganda Dua Tingkat. (Skripsi), FPMIPA, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.

Rofifah, R. (2015). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik Two-Tier Berbasis Piktorial Untuk Mengidentifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Pada Larutan Elektrolit dan Nonelektrolit. (Skripsi), FPMIPA, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.

Pertiwi. (2012). Profil Kondisi Fisik Atlet Anggar di Kabupaten Purworejo Jawa Tengah. (Skripsi), FPOK, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta.

Petrucci dkk. (2007). Kimia Dasar Prinsip-Prinsip dan Aplikasi Modern Edisi Kesembilan Jilid 2. Jakarta : Penerbit Erlangga.

Silberberg, M.S. (2007). Principles Of General Chemistry. New York : The McGraw-Hill Companies.

Silverius, S. (1991). Evaluasi hasil belajar dan umpan balik. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.

Soedjono. (2005). Metode Penelitian Deskriptif. Yogyakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Sudijono, A. (2007). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta : PT Rajagrafindo Persada.

Sunarya, Y. dan Setiabudi, A. (2009) . Mudah dan Aktif Belajar Kimia Untuk Kelas X Sekolah Menengah Atas/Madrasah Aliyah . Jakarta : Pusat Perbukuan Kementrian Pendidikan Nasional.

Susetyo, B. (2015). Statistika Untuk Analisis Data Penelitian. Banding : Refika Aditama.

Tan, K.C.D. dkk. (2002). “Development and application of a two tier multiple

choice diagnostic instrument to assess high school students’ understanding of

(4)

177

Tan, K.C.D. dkk. (2005). “The ionisation energy diagnostic instrument: a two-tier multiple-choice instrument to determine high school students’ understanding of ionisation energy”. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 6 (4), hlm. 180-197.

Tavassoli, A., Jahandar, S. & Khodabandehlou, M. (2013). “The effect of pictorial context on reading comprehension of iranian high school students : a comparison between pre-vs. during reading activities”. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences, 3 (3), hlm. 553-565.

Tien, L.T., Teichert, M.A. & Rickey, D. (2007). “Effectiveness of MORE laboratory module in prompting student to revise their molecular-level ideas about solutions”. Journal of Chemical Education. 84 (1), hlm. 175-177.

Treagust, D.F. (2007). “Development and use of diagnostic test to evaluate

students’ misconcepstions in science”. International Journal of Science Education. 10(2), hlm. 159-169.

Tȕysȕz, C. ( 2009 ). “Development of two-tier diagnostic instrument and assess

students’ understanding in chemistry”. Scientific Research and Essay. 4 (6), hlm. 626 – 631.

Weis, M., Heikamp, T. & Trommsdorff, G. (2013). “Gender differences in school achievement: The role of self-regulation”. Department of Psychology University of Konstanz Germany. 4, 1-10.

Wu, H.K. Krajcik, J. & Soloway, E. (2001). “Promoting Understanding of Chemical Representations: Students' Use of a Visualization Tool in the Classroom”. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 38(7), 821-842.

Wulan, AR. (2007). “Pengertian dan Konsep Esensi Konsep Evaluasi, Asesmen,

Tes dan Pengukuran”. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam. 1-18.

Whitten dkk. (2004). General Chemistry Seventh Edition. Amerika : BrooksCole.

Yezierski, E.J dan Birk, J.P. (2006) . “Misconceptions about particulate nature of

matter using animations to close the gender gap”. Research Science and Education . 83(6), 954-960.