23 11
Article 05.3.5
Journal of Integer Sequences, Vol. 8 (2005), 2
3 6 1 47
A Self-Indexed Sequence
Emmanuel Preissmann
11 rue Vinet
1004 Lausanne
Switzerland
[email protected]
Abstract
We investigate the integer sequence (tn)n∈Z defined by tn = 0 if n ≤ 0, t1 = 1, and tn = Pni=1−1tn−ti for n ≥ 2. This sequence has the following properties: if we
considerfn(X) :=−1 +Pni=1Xti and takex
nto be the real positive number such that
fn(xn) = 0, then
lim n→∞
tn
tn+1
= lim
n→∞xn= 0.410098516· · ·
Moreover, if u is the real positive number such that 1 = P∞i=1u−ti, then there is a
positive constantM such that tn∼M un.
1
Definitions and main results
If we look in theOnline Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences of N. J. A. Sloane [1], we find a remarkable sequence by (tn)n∈Z defined by tn= 0 if n ≤0,t1 = 1 and
tn = n−1
X
i=1
tn−ti (1.1)
for n ≥2. This sequence is due to Robert Lozyniak (A052109 in Sloane) and is a cousin of the Hofstadter-Conway $10,000 challenge sequence (A004001in Sloane).
We find t2 = 1, t3 = 2, t4 = 5, t5 = 12, t6 = 30, t7 = 73, . . . Observe that if n ≥ 2 ,
tn+1 = 2tn+· · · ≥2tn. Since t4 = 4 + 1, we have
tn ≥n+ 1 (n≥4) (1.2)
The serieP∞
i=1Xt
i = 2X+X2+· · · converges for|X|<1. Letube the real positive number
such that ∞
X
i=1
We easily see that 2< u <3. Indeed we have P∞
Theorem 1.1. There exists a positive constant M such that
lim
n=1 is strictly decreasing. Indeed,
n
This proves thatxn+1 < xn for every n. Moreover, this sequence is bounded, so it converges
to an element, say v. The function f∞(x) = −1 +
if n is big enough. Finally,
f∞(v) = lim
n→∞f∞(xn) = 0.
That is,v = 1u, because u1 is the only positive zero of f∞.
2
Proof of the Theorem
We begin with a lemma:
Proof. Without loss of generality, we can suppose that vn ≤ 12. If an infinite number of vn > 12, the claims 2.1 and 2.2 are both wrong, otherwise we can take out the finite number
of vn > 12. By Taylor expansion, we have for 0≤x≤ 12
So the lemma is proved.
Lemma 2.2. There exists a constant d such that
0< d≤ tn positive integer n.
Proof. If n ≤ 1, this is evident. Suppose that n ≥ 1 and by induction that ti ≤ ui−1 when
By induction we have
∞
By the definition ofCN
Proof. Suppose that d′
Proof of the Theorem. According to Lemmas (2.4), (2.5), (2.6) and the definition of CN,
we have, for 1≤N < n and k ≥0:
tn+k ≤CNun+k−t′k+2(CNun−tn) +akuN ≤CNun+k−d′uk+2(CNun−tn) +uN+k
Letǫ > 0. There exists N such that C ≤CN < C+ǫ, and n > N such that uN−n < ǫ and tn
un < D+ǫ.In these conditions, we have
tn+k
un+k < C +ǫ−d
′
u2(C−D−ǫ) +ǫ.
There exists k such that tn+k
un+k > C−ǫ. Then C−ǫ < C+ǫ−d
′u2(C−D−ǫ) +ǫ. Letting ǫ tend to 0 gives C ≤C−d′u2(C−D). Hence d′u2(C−D)≤0. This implies C ≤D and
thusC =D.
3
Acknowledgments
I am grateful to M. Mischler for valuable help and many fruitful discussions during the course of this work.
References
[1] N. J. A. Sloane, Online Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences,
http://www.research.att.com/˜njas/sequences/
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary 11Y55.
Keywords: integer sequences.
(Concerned with sequence A052109.)
Received May 16 2005; revised version received July 28 2005. Published inJournal of Integer Sequences, August 2 2005.