• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

T1 112008138 Full text

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "T1 112008138 Full text"

Copied!
23
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

A STUDY OF TEACHER’S QUESTIONS IN AN ELEMENTARY

SCHOOL

THESIS

Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of

Sarjana Pendidikan

Vitus Awang Septiaji 112008138

ENGLISH DEPARTMENT

FACULTY OF LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE

SATYA WACANA CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY

SALATIGA

(2)

ii

A STUDY OF TEACHER’S QUESTIONS IN AN ELEMENTARY

SCHOOL

THESIS

Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of

Sarjana Pendidikan

Vitus Awang Septiaji 112008138

ENGLISH DEPARTMENT

FACULTY OF LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE

SATYA WACANA CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY

SALATIGA

(3)
(4)

iii

A STUDY OF TEACHER’S QUESTIONS IN AN ELEMENTARY

SCHOOL

THESIS

Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of

Sarjana Pendidikan

Vitus Awang Septiaji 112008138 Approved by:

Anita Kurniawati, M.Hum Maria Christina Eko S., M.Hum

(5)

iv

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

This thesis contains no such material as has been submitted for examination in any course or accepted for the fulfillment of any degree or diploma in any university. To the best of my knowledge and my belief, this contains no material previously published or written by any other person except where due reference is made in the text.

Copyright@ 2013.Vitus Awang Septiaji and Anita Kurniawati, M.Hum

All rights reserved. No part of this thesis may be reproduced by any means without the permission of at least one of the copyright owners or the English Department, Faculty of Language and Literature, Satya Wacana University, Salatiga.

(6)

v

PUBLICATION AGREEMENT DECLARATION

As a member of the (SWCU) Satya Wacana Christian University academic community, I verify that:

Name: VITUS AWANG SEPTIAJI

Student ID Number: 112008138

Study Program: English Department Faculty: Language and Literature Kind of Work: Undergraduate Thesis

In developing my knowledge, I agree to provide SWCU with a non-exclusive royalty free right for my intellectual property and the contents therein entitled:

A STUDY OF TEACHER’S QUESTIONS IN AN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

along with any pertinent equipment.

With this non-exclusive royalty free right, SWCU maintains the right to copy, reproduce, print, publish, post, display, incorporate, store in or scan into a retrieval system or database, transmit, broadcast, barter or sell my intellectual property, in whole or in part without my express written permission, as long as my name is still included as the writer.

This declaration is made according to the best of my knowledge.

(7)

1

A STUDY OF TEACHER’S QUESTIONS IN AN ELEMENTARY

SCHOOL

Abstract

In teaching-learning process communicative tools are needed by teachers to enhance interactions between teachers and young learners. One of the communicative tools is asking question. Kearsley’s (1976) types of questions were selected as the basis of the literature review of this analysis. They are six types of questions that are purposed by Kearsley (Ibid). However in the five class observation conducted in SD Lab Satya Wacana Salatiga, there are only four types of questions used by the teachers; evaluative, echoic, social control and expressive questions. Each one of the four types has its functions that can be applied through interactions. It is found from the findings that the use of four types of questions is most effective used in the classroom interactions based from the questions own functions.

Key-word: types of questions, english teachers, the functions of questions

INTRODUCTION

Delivering question is one of techniques used by teachers to interact with students and

to convey idea of teaching and learning process. Delivering question plays important role in teaching and learning process as Gabrielatos (1997) believed that asking question is one of the most essential teaching tools or techniques that teachers can use frequently during the

lesson. Questioning is an essential component of teaching. Agreed with Gabrielatos (ibid) Tsui, Marton, Mok and Ng (2004) assure that questions can draw learners’ attention to the

important aspects of learning objective, and open up the space for more study on the part of learners.It is an important tool in teaching because it is used again and again by the teachers in the teaching and learning activity to build interaction with students and create cooperative

(8)

2

Delivering question is not only important but also has purposes and aims while

playing its part in teaching and learning process. Sonmez (2001) proposed several purposes of asking question in teaching and learning process. The question can be asked in the purpose of directing the students to the target in learning process, providing the students to

think effectively by directing students to think, determining the efficiency of education, increasing students’ attendance, improving the students’ listening skills and increasing

tolerance and respect among the students. Delivering question can stimulate the connection between students and the topic discussed. Chi, et al (1994) agreed that when teachers ask critical questions for students to answer; it will promote a better learning process of the

students and deepen their understanding through those questions asked by teacher.

Delivering question is aimed to increase the understanding of a certain topic given by

the teachers. Scarino et al (2005) also proposed that a teacher questioning the students is to dig their existing understandings as a basis for identifying ways of interacting, scaffolding and building the basis of the topic discussed into the brain and build connection between the

topic discussed and the background knowledge in the brain. In the other word, questioning in the class is the railway to go to the certain location. It provides the connection between the

background knowledge in brain and the topic in the class. For example: in the beginning of the lesson, the teacher uses brainstorming to connect the topic of present lesson with students’ past lesson.

The questioning technique that teachers usually use is brainstorming an idea. Brainstorming is one of the ways to dig students’ background knowledge. Asking question

(9)

3

Brainstorming is applied by teachers to ask students a few questions that can lead the young

learners to think critically about the discussion.

Regarding to the aforementioned purposes of delivering question it is believed that students’, especially young learners, need to be stimulated. Cameron (2001) said that even

though children seek out intentions and purposes in what they see to what other people doing, bringing their knowledge and experience to their attempt to make sense of other people’s

action and language, they are limited by their experience and that is why they needed stimulus for better learning. Cameron (ibid) also stated that actually the young learners are active learner since they do not only need stimulus given; they also look and want to know

about things surrounding them. It is considered as a proper setting for teachers to develop kinds of questions that appropriate to be asked for young learners.

This study is aimed to identify kinds of questions that English course teachers asked to young learners in their class. This study is guided by one research question that is “What

kind of questions English teachers ask to young learners in their class?”

This study will be helpful for the pre-service teachers who do their teaching and it may also improve their teaching’s techniques and provide guidelines to help teachers use

questions effectively in order to facilitate the learning and teaching process. Teacher who read this paper also know kinds of questions that they could give to their students especially

young learners. Teacher also can identify what questions should be use suitably for their students. I hope that the other pre-service teacher will be able to overcome the problem in

(10)

4

LITERATURE REVIEW

Teacher’s Questions

Some research shows that questioning is one of the most familiar techniques used by teachers in their classroom (Dillon 1990) as cited in Nhlapo (1998). Along with Dillon, Ellis

(1992) also proposed two main reason why teachers asked questions in the classroom. First, questions require responses and because of that it will be count as contribution to interaction

from responding it. Second, questions serve as a device for controlling the classroom progress of the interaction which a lesson is conducted.

Types of Questions

Martin (2003) groups the question forms in three as Genuine questions, Test questions and Provoking ones. The genuine question is a type of question that asked because the

teacher wants the answer. In line with Martin, Gabrielatos (1997) proposed that genuine question is questions which actually seeks answer. In her research Martin indicated that 25 %

of them ask genuine questions (How many different triangles did you find? Which measurement did you use?). She proposed that 61 % of the teachers ask test question. A test question is a question to check the understanding of a certain topic it is merely only from one

side of knowledge. (E.g. How many sides in a triangle? How can we simplify this fraction?), and the last group of question is Provoking questions which is used by teacher to encourage students to speak more it is more like bait to student to answer and speak more using these

kinds of questions. It kinds of the provoking question is like a trigger of question chain and it digs better answer and make students think more critically because they are simulated to

(11)

5

Shomoosi in (1997) also proposed some generalizable pattern of teacher’s use of

questions in the observed EFL classroom. The first one is Referential question which are those question for which the answer is not already known by the teacher or the questions deliverer, the questions require interpretation and judgment on the part of the “answerer”.

The second is Display question which refer to questions for which the questioner knows the answer beforehand; the questions are usually asked for comprehension, confirmation or

clarification. The third one is Classroom interaction is used, in this study, meaning any sort of interaction occurring in the classroom.

Kearsley (1976) proposed questions and made the following taxonomy of questions'

types as cited in Shomoossi (1997) and cited by Toni (2013), The first type is Echoic. These are questions which ask for the repetition of an utterance or confirmation that an utterance

from teacher has been interpreted as intended (E.g. Pardon? Sorry, what?). The second one is Epistemic. This is type of question which serves the purpose of acquiring information or as Martin shared the opinion with her genuine questions. In this taxonomy, Kearsley

differentiated epistemic questions into two: the first Epistemic questions are Referential; which is intended to provide contextual information about situations, events, actions,

purposes, relationships or properties (Wh-questions, for example how is your relationship with your friends? What is your opinion?). Then the second Epistemic questions are Evaluative; which asked to establish the addressee's knowledge of the answer (sometimes called display, known information questions, or in Martin’s group called test questions). The

third type is Expressive: this question is conveying attitudinal information from the addresser

to the addressee. In this group the addresser is the teacher and the addressee is the students (e.g. Are you understand or not?). The fourth type is Social control; which are questions used to exert authority by maintaining control of the discourse. (E.g. Are you ready to start today’s

(12)

6

of the discourse (for example is "listen to me" or "think about this"). And the last type is

Verbosity; which asked only for the sake of politeness or to sustain conversation (e.g. cocktail party questions)

Characteristic of young learners

In Teaching Languages to Young Learners, Cameron (2001) emphasized that “(the children) [young learners]… actively try to make sense of the world… ask questions… want

to know… Also from very early stages, the children have purposes and intentions as they

want to do.” Donaldson (1978: 86.)

According to Cameron (ibid), children are usually curious about things especially the

new ones. It is considered that teachers have to take a role of applying the questioning styles to increase their [young learners] background knowledge by digging the existed one in their

mind and planting the new one that will later being discussed in this journal. The use of questions here plays a role as a communication trigger and promotes a better understanding as Chi (1994) has already explained. This habit of young learners actually made the job of

teachers easier to be done because their curious habit makes them want to know what material we wanted to give to them. This will sort some natural characteristics and skills of children since the better teacher know children’s strengths and weaknesses the better teacher

could teach them

METHODOLOGY

This study is qualitative research. It tries to describe what teacher’s questions used in

(13)

7 Context of the study

The setting of this study is SD Laboratorium of Satya Wacana which is located in Salatiga, Central Java, Indonesia. I take the sample of convenience because I take my last

teaching practicum there.

Participants

The participants for this study are 4 (four) English teachers of Laboratorium of Satya

Wacana Elementary School. Their major in teaching is English. I choose all of the English teachers there to strengthen my idea of the importance of identifying kinds of questions.

Instrument of data collection

To fulfill the aim of this study, the instrument of data collection that was used to get reliable data about kinds of questions used in the classroom was observation that is completed

by 8 times with time-sampling protocol by Zacharias (2011). This protocol was used to ease the note-taking about the kinds of questions teachers used in classroom. This protocol also eased the researcher to recall the time of the note-taking. This study also used an evaluative

or structural observation technique. In conducting the observation, the researcher came to the classroom with a specific observation focus Zacharias (2011). Thus, the observation only

focuses on kinds of questions the teacher used.

A time-sampling protocol for teacher’s questions in English course in elementary

(14)

8

Observation Protocol

Name of course : English Course Name of the teacher : Teacher 1

Topic : Holiday Class time : 70 minutes Grade :

Time

Categorization of questions

In class example

type Sub type

Procedures of data collection

The observation will be done in 2 x 35 minutes and divided into parts of 10 minutes. The questions teachers asked to the students will be written in the observation protocol. Each of the questions then will be classified into 6 (six) groups of questions based on Kearsley

(1976) as cited in Shomoosi (1997).

Data analysis procedure

The data gathered from Real-time observation without using any electronic means to recall the data by Wallace (1998) as cited in Zacharias (2011). Then the data were recorded

or transcribed using time sampling protocol by Zacharias (2011). The data were categorized into some types of questions used in the classroom which I obtained in the observations. The data in this study were analyzed qualitatively, and supported with theories from language

(15)

9

Findings and Discussion

This section discusses kinds of questions teachers’ used in English classes. In each

category of kinds of questions, there are some excerpts from the data. The categories of kinds

of questions were based on Kearsley (1976) as cited in Shomoosi (1997) and cited by Toni (2013) frameworks. However from the overall six categories written by Kearsley (1997) there

are only four which has shown up in the observation. The four categories stated are Epistemic, Echoic, Expressive, and Social Control questions. Attentional and Verbosity

questions were not found in the classroom observation.

Epistemic questions

Kearsley (1976) as cited in Shomoosi (1997) and cited by Toni (2013) divided

Epistemic question into two part Referential questions and Evaluative / Display / Test

questions. Shomoosi (1997) believed as explained above, the two types of questions are contrasted as to the epistemic questions, of the one who asks, about the answer expected.

These two are referential and evaluative questions. As noted above, the teachers ask evaluative questions only to evaluate their students, only to find out whether they have got

the lesson or not. While, by asking referential questions, teachers want to elicit first-hand information from the students.

Evaluative questions

These evaluative questions are very often used in classroom activity because the teacher wants to test the already known knowledge of the student. This kind of questions also

provide the connections of the topic with the students. This type of question holds the first place of the most common questions asked by the teacher. The examples when the teacher

(16)

10 Excerpts 1

(Present Continuous Tense: My mother is ………. to her old friend.) Teacher 1 : What can you add there?

Students : Talking sir.

Teacher 1 : What else besides “talking” that could you may add? Students : Smiling?

Teacher 1 : Yes, it can be. Excerpts 2

(Transportation: Land Transportation (train)) Teacher 2 : Passenger trains means?

Student 1 : Passenger artinya penumpang pak, terus train artinya kereta api pak. Teacher 2 : Good, then. Why train is faster than a car?

Student 3 : Di kereta api nggak ada macet pak. Teacher 2 : Well, okay.

Toni (2013) proposed that evaluative questions as a display questions that are used to test the student or check the known information. It can be seen from the excerpts 1 and 2 that

the evaluative questions are used to check or test the known information of the students. Brock (1986) reports that responses to questions calling for the recognition or recall of factual

information of the students. In the observation this type of questions is used the most in classroom. Teacher 1 used these kinds of questions the most while teaching in classroom

followed by Teacher 2. Teacher 2 stated to the students that he believes that he merely use it to

check the understanding of the students as Brock (ibid) has stated while he was teaching in the

classroom. The other teachers also convey the same question at the same amount of kinds of

questions to the student even though they were not as much as teacher 2 while using this kinds of

questions. Along with Shomoosi (1997) in the observation this is type of question is used by most

teacher rather than referential questions.

Referential questions

Below are examples of the use of referential questions in English classroom.

Excerpts 3

(Present Continuous Tense)

Teacher 1 : What is Briand doing? Student : He is watching television.

(17)

11

Student : Iya pak. He is watching television berarti kan masih nonton TV to pak kan Watching.

Teacher 1 : Bagus. Excerpts 4

(Hobby: trying to dig more understanding about a picture given by the teacher) Teacher 3 : What is she doing? the classroom as cited in Shoomosi (1997). In her research Brock (1986) believes that the use of referential questions is important because it creates a flow of information from student to

teacher which may create discourse which more nearly reassembles the normal conversation learning experience. From the excerpt 3 and 4, it can be seen that the teacher is trying to dig

more understanding from the student about the topic discussed. Teacher 1 asked about, “What is Brian doing?”. After the student answered the question, the teacher continued with

another question, “Sekarang masih nonton TV atau tidak?”. The question is aimed to dig

more understanding from the students about present continuous tense which is used in the sentence. Teacher explicitly wanted an elaborated answer from the student related to present continuous tense based from the topic discussed. The aim of the teacher’s questions are

fulfilled when the student give the appropriate answer toward the questions.

Teacher 3 asked about hobbies using pictures as the medium. She asked “What is she

doing?” while showing a picture of a person hiking on the hill. After the student answer it,

she asked another question “Do you like hiking?” to check the understanding of the student

about the certain activity which is hiking. Then, the students gave the answer that shows their understanding about hiking. The aim of the teacher’s questions is also fulfilled in this

(18)

12

The excerpts support the statement of Shomoosi (1997) which believed that epistemic

questions are important to be asked to students because it checks the already known understanding of the students. By questioning the students with epistemic questions, the

students are stimulated to shows their understanding toward certain topic or material.

Expressive questions

Teachers there are also providing the expressive questions to the student. Here are

some examples of expressive questions found in the observation. Excerpts 5

(Simple Past Tense)

Teacher 1 : Any other opinion?

Student A : Berarti simple past tense hanya dipakai untuk masa lalu pak? Teacher 1 : Wah berarti kamu ngga bisa move on? Wkwkwk.

Simple past itu hanya digunakan untuk menunjukkan bahwa kejadian itu terjadi di masa lampau.

Teacher 4 : Up to this point is there any question? Student A : Miss, baju itu apa?

Teacher 4 : Baju itu, S-H-I-R-T. Shirt. Student B : Itu bukannya rok ya miss?

Teacher 4 : Itu S-K-I-R-T. skirt. Artinya ROK.

Expressive questions are those that show the attitude of the speaker Nhlapo (1998).

Along with him Toni (2013) proposed expressive questions as conveying attitudinal information to the addressee. In the excerpts 5 and 6 the teachers wanted to engage the

student with the attitudinal information. Teachers 1 and 4 wanted the students to speak more by using questions as the trigger. Teacher 1’s questions stimulate the curiosity of the students.

He asked about “Any other opinion?” Then the student answered with another question

“Berarti simple past tense hanya bisa dipakai untuk masa lalu pak?”. The same thing

(19)

13

question?”. Then the student answered with following question to the teacher which is “Miss,

baju itu apa?”. These kind of questions could go along with young learners because young

learners’ curiosity Cameron (2001).

Social Control questions

In this social control questions the teacher used their power to maintain the discourse. These are some example from the observation excerpts.

Excerpts 7

(In-class situation)

Teacher 1 : Could you please close the book? Students : Silent (while slowly closing the book). Excerpts 8

(In-class discussion)

Teacher 2 : Could you speak louder Kanu?

Student : (Following the teacher’s instruction by repeating the sentence louder)

Kearsley as cited in Shomoosi and cited by Toni (2013) proposed social control questions are questions that are used to maintain power by preserving the dialog. In excerpts

7 and 8 the teachers used their power to maintain the lesson in the classroom. In excerpts 7 the teacher wanted the students to close their books. So, he used the question “Could you please close the book?”. The students responded the teacher’s questions by closing their

books. The teacher gave command to the students indirectly, by using a question to make it more polite. It shows that the teacher’s social control in the classroom.

The teacher’s social control is also shown in excerpts 8 The teacher asked a particular

student “Could you speak louder, Kanu?”. Then the student followed the indirect command

from the teacher by increasing the volume of his voice.

By questioning such questions, the teachers implement their social control function in classroom. These event supports Kearsley’s as cited in Shomoosi and cited by Toni (2013)

(20)

14 Echoic questions

In the observations, two out of four teachers used these echoic questions. Below are two examples from the two teachers using echoic questions in classroom.

Excerpt 9 (Transportation)

Teacher 2 : Transportation I guess, right?

(Which ask for confirmation from the students.) Student : Yes sir.

Excerpts 10 (Hobby)

Student : Miss, kalo maen skateboard itu bahasa inggrisnya apa? Teacher 3 : Pardon? (questions here were asked for repetition) Student : Miss, kalo maen skateboard itu bahasa inggrisnya apa? Teacher 3 : Skateboarding.

Echoic questions are questions which ask for the reiteration of a confirmation or verification that it has been understood as intended Ellis (2008). From the excerpts, it can be

seen that, the teachers used echoic questions when he/she wanted a confirmation or verification answer from the students in the classroom. Teacher use this kind of question in

class when the student stated a question and then teacher returned it with a confirmation or verifier question.

Conclusion

The aim of the study was to analyze what kinds of questions teacher asked to the

young learners in the classroom. It was found that the teachers used four types of questions asked to young learners. Each type of questions was used with different purposes owned by the teachers. The first type of questions used is Epistemic Question. It is divided into two

subtypes, Evaluative Questions and Referential Questions. The teacher asked Evaluative Questions only to evaluate their students, only to find out whether they have got the lesson or

(21)

15

is Social Control Question. It was found that the use of Social Control Questions was aimed

to maintain the lesson in the classroom. The last type of questions found was Echoic Question which has function to ask for confirmation or verification.

However, this study still has limitations. The first limitation is the number of School

observed. Bigger number of the data collected will maybe be more beneficial for the reliability of the further studies. The second limitation is on the time allocation. There is limit

of time for me as a researcher doing the research. Therefore, having the time allocation which is longer than the time in this present study will be more valuable.

Based on the finding, this study recommended that teacher in elementary school can use the four types of questions to fulfill their duty in teaching English. The use of these kinds of questions can increase the teacher’s quality of teaching maximally and effectively. This

study was only conducted in SD Laboratorium Satya Wacana Salatiga. The focus of the study was only on the teachers as the participants. For further study, the same topic can be held in more than one elementary school to get more data about what types of questions teacher

asked to young learners. To take student as the participant is also recommended because they may have different opinion toward what types of questions teacher should asked to young

(22)

16

References

Brock, C. A. (1986). The effects of referential question on ESL classroom discourse. TESOL Quarterly 20: 47-59. Retrieved February, 14, 2013 from

www.idosi.org/hssj/hssj2(2)07/7.pdf

Cameron, L. (2001). Teaching Languages to Young Learners. The University of Cambridge.

United Kingdom.

Chi, M.T.H., De Leeuw, N., Chiu, M., Lavancher, C. (1994). Eliciting Self-Explanations improves understanding. University of Pittsburgh. February, 14, 2013 from chilab.asu.edu/ChideLeeuwChiuLaVancher.pdf

Dillon, J.T. (1990). The practice of questioning. London: Routledge.

Ellis, R. (1992). Second language acquisition and language pedagogy. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.

Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford: OUP. Gabrielatos, C. (1997). A question of function: Teacher questions in the EFL classroom.

Paper given at 18th Annual TESOL Greece Convention, National Bank of Greece

Training Centre, Glyfada, Greece, 12-13 April 1997. Retrieved December, 13, 2012, from

http://www.academia.edu/3007175/Gabrielatos_C._1997_._A_Question_of_function_Teache r_questions_in_the_EFL_classroom._18th_Annual_TESOL_Greece_Convention_Glyfada_Gr eece_12-13_April_1997

Lynch, T.(1991). Questioning Roles in the classroom. ELT Journal 45 (3): 201 – 210.

Retrieved January, 20, 2013, from

http://www.academia.edu/1954392/The_role_of_questions_posed_to_young_learners_in_clas sroom_interaction

Martin, N. (2003). Questioning Styles. Mathematics Teaching.184, September.

Nhlapo, M. (1998). A case study of a teacher’s questions in an english second language (ESL) classroom. Rhodes University.

Scarino, A. (2005). Direct from source: Teaching and Learning Languages: A Guide, Assessing part p. 470. Retrieved October, 11, 2012 from

http://www.tllg.unisa.edu.au/contacts.html

Shomoossi, N. (1997) The Effect of Teacher's Questioning Behavior on EFL Classroom Interaction: a classroom-based research. University ofAllameh Tabatabaee,

Deparment of English, Faculty of Literrature and Foreign Languages.

(23)

17

Toni, A. (2013). The Status of Teacher’s Questions and Students’ Responses: The Case of an

EFL Class. Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

Tsui, A. B. M., Marton, F., Mok, I. A. C., & Ng, D. F. P. (2004). Questions and the space of learning. In F. Marton & A. B. M. Tsui (Eds.), Classroom discourse and the space of learning (pp. 113–137). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Puji syukur kami panjatkan kehadirat Allah SWT yang telah melimpahkan karunia, taufik, dan hidayah-Nya, sehingga Tugas Akhir “PERENCANAAN GEOMETRIK, TEBAL

Tugas akhir ini melakukan penelitian partial discharge (PD) skala laboratorium dengan menerapkan tegangan tinggi AC gelombang Sinusoidal dan tegangan tinggi AC

[r]

[r]

Proporsi penggunaan obat antihipertensi yang diberikan pada seluruh pasien sudah efektif karena pasien mencapai outcome terapi pada hari rawat akhir pasien di

Ungkapan puji dan syukur dipanjatkan kepada Sang pemberi hidup, karena atas tuntunan dan penyertaan-Nya penulis telah dapat menyelesaikan Karya Tulis Ilmiah yang

Cara yang dapat dilakukan dengan mengoptimalkan program dana BOS (Bantuan Oprasional Sekolah) guna untuk membantu masyarakat yang mengalami kesulitan dalam kebutuhan

Dengan ini diberitahukan, bahwa setelah diadakan penelitian oleh Pejabat Pengadaan sesuai ketentuan – ketentuan yang berlaku maka Pejabat Pengadaan