ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR
S T E P H E N P. R O B B I N S
S T E P H E N P. R O B B I N S
E L E V E N T H E D I T I O NE L E V E N T H E D I T I O N
W W W . P R E N H A L L . C O M / R O B B I N S
W W W . P R E N H A L L . C O M / R O B B I N S
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc.
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc.
All rights reserved. PowerPoint Presentation PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook
Motivation Concepts
Pertemuan 4
Muhammad Arief
© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
What Is Motivation?
Direction
Key Elements
1. Intensity: how hard a person tries
2. Direction: toward beneficial goal
3. Persistence: how long a person tries
Key Elements
1. Intensity: how hard a person tries
2. Direction: toward beneficial goal
3. Persistence: how long a person tries
Motivation
The processes that account for an individual’s
intensity, direction, and persistence of effort
toward attaining a goal.
What is Motivation?
© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
Hierarchy of Needs Theory (Maslow)
Hierarchy of Needs Theory (Maslow)
Hierarchy of Needs Theory
There is a hierarchy of five needs
—physiological, safety, social,
esteem, and self-actualization; as
each need is substantially
satisfied, the next need becomes
dominant.
Self-Actualization
Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs
Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs
E X H I B I T 6–1
E X H I B I T 6–1
Lower-Order Needs
Needs that are satisfied
externally; physiological
and safety needs.
© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
Assumptions of Maslow’s Hierarchy
Assumptions of Maslow’s Hierarchy
Movement up the Pyramid
•Individuals cannot move to the next higher level until
all needs at the current (lower) level are satisfied.
Maslow Application:
A homeless person
will not be motivated to
meditate!
Maslow Application:
A homeless person
will not be motivated to
meditate!
•Individuals
therefore must
move up the
Theory X
Theory X
Managers See Workers As…
Managers See Workers As…
Disliking Work
Disliking Work
Avoiding Responsibility
Avoiding Responsibility
Having Little Ambition
Having Little Ambition
Theory Y
Theory Y
Managers See Workers As…
Managers See Workers As…
© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory
Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory
Bottom Line: Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction
are not Opposite Ends of the Same Thing!
Separate constructs
–
Hygiene Factors---Extrinsic &
Related to
Dissatisfaction
–
Motivation Factors---Intrinsic
and Related to
Satisfaction
Comparison of Satisfiers
and Dissatisfiers
Comparison of Satisfiers
and Dissatisfiers
Factors characterizing
events on
the
job that led to
extreme job dissatisfaction
Factors characterizing
events on the job that
led to extreme job
satisfaction
E X H I B I T 6–2
E X H I B I T 6–2
© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
Contrasting Views of Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction
Contrasting Views of Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction
E X H I B I T 6–3
David McClelland’s Theory of Needs
David McClelland’s Theory of Needs
Need for Achievement
The drive to excel, to achieve
in relation to a set of
standards, to strive to
succeed.
Need for Affiliation
The desire for friendly
and close personal
relationships.
Need for Power
The need to make others
behave in a way that they
would not have behaved
otherwise.
Bottom Line:
Individuals have
different levels of
needs in each of these
areas, and those
levels will drive their
© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
Matching High Achievers and Jobs
Matching High Achievers and Jobs
E X H I B I T 6–4
Cognitive Evaluation Theory
Cognitive Evaluation Theory
Cognitive Evaluation Theory
Providing an extrinsic reward for behavior that
had been previously only intrinsically rewarding
tends to decrease the overall level of motivation.
The theory may only be relevant to
jobs that are neither extremely
dull nor extremely interesting.
Hint: For this theory,
think about how fun it
is to read in the
summer, but once
© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
E X H I B I T 6–5
E X H I B I T 6–5
What Would Herzberg Say? What Would Maslow Say?
Goal-Setting Theory (Edwin Locke)
Goal-Setting Theory (Edwin Locke)
Basic Premise: That
specific
and
difficult
goals, with
self-generated feedback
, lead to
higher performance.
But, the relationship between goals and
performance will depend on
•goal commitment
–“I want to do it & I can do it”
© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
Goal Setting in Action: MBO Programs
Goal Setting in Action: MBO Programs
Management By Objectives Programs
•
Company wide goals & objectives
•
Goals aligned at all levels
•
Based on Goal Setting Theory
Management By Objectives Programs
•
Company wide goals & objectives
•
Goals aligned at all levels
What is MBO?
What is MBO?
Key Elements
1. Goal specificity
2. Participative decision making
3. An explicit time period
4. Performance feedback
Key Elements
1. Goal specificity
2. Participative decision making
3. An explicit time period
4. Performance feedback
Management by Objectives (MBO)
© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
Cascading of Objectives
Cascading of Objectives
E X H I B I T 6–1
Linking MBO and Goal-Setting Theory
Linking MBO and Goal-Setting Theory
MBO
Goal-Setting Theory
Goal Specificity
Yes
Yes
Goal Difficulty
Yes
Yes
Feedback
Yes
Yes
Participation
Yes
No
© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
Why MBOs Fail
Why MBOs Fail
Unrealistic expectations about MBO results
Lack of commitment by top management
Failure to allocate reward properly
Self-Efficacy
Self-Efficacy
Self Esteem, which is….
Individuals’ degree of liking or disliking
themselves.
•
An individual’s feeling that s/he can
complete a task (e.g. “I know I can!”)
•
Enhances probability that goals will
be achieved
© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
Self-Efficacy and Goal Setting
Four Ways of Increasing Self Efficacy
(Bandura)
Four Ways of Increasing Self Efficacy
(Bandura)
1. Enactive Mastery
2. Vicarious Modeling
3. Verbal Persuasion
4. Arousal
Note: Basic Premise/Mechanism of
Pygmalion
and
© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
Reinforcement Theory
Reinforcement Theory
Assumptions:
•
Behavior is environmentally caused.
•
Behavior can be modified (reinforced) by
providing (controlling) consequences.
•
Reinforced behavior tends to be repeated.
Assumptions:
•
Behavior is environmentally caused.
•
Behavior can be modified (reinforced) by
providing (controlling) consequences.
•
Reinforced behavior tends to be repeated.
Equity Theory
Equity Theory
Referent
Comparisons:
Self-inside
Self-outside
Other-inside
Other-outside
Referent
Comparisons:
Self-inside
Self-outside
Other-inside
Other-outside
Equity Theory
© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
Equity Theory (cont’d)
Equity Theory (cont’d)
E X H I B I T 6–8
Equity Theory (cont’d)
Equity Theory (cont’d)
Choices for dealing with inequity:
1. Change inputs (slack off)
2. Change outcomes (increase output)
3. Distort/change perceptions of self
4. Distort/change perceptions of others
5. Choose a different referent person
6. Leave the field (quit the job)
Choices for dealing with inequity:
1. Change inputs (slack off)
© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
Equity Theory (cont’d)
Equity Theory (cont’d)
Propositions relating to inequitable pay:
1. Overrewarded hourly employees produce
more than equitably rewarded employees.
2. Overrewarded piece-work employees
produce less, but do higher quality piece
work.
3. Underrewarded hourly employees produce
lower quality work.
4. Underrewarded employees produce larger
quantities of lower-quality piece work than
equitably rewarded employees.
Propositions relating to inequitable pay:
1. Overrewarded hourly employees produce
more than equitably rewarded employees.
2. Overrewarded piece-work employees
produce less, but do higher quality piece
work.
3. Underrewarded hourly employees produce
lower quality work.
Justice and Equity Theory
© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
Distributive Justice
Perceived fairness of the
outcome (the final
distribution).
“Who got what?”
Procedural Justice
The perceived fairness of
the process used to
determine the outcome
(the final distribution).
“How was who gets what
decided?”
Interactional Justice
The degree to which one
is treated with dignity
and respect.
“Was I treated well?”
Three types of Justice
Ethical Values and
Ethical Values and
Behaviors of Leaders
Behaviors of Leaders
Bottom line
•
All three links between the boxes must be intact or
motivation will not occur. Thus,
•
Individuals must feel that if they try, they can perform
And
•
If they perform, they will be rewarded
And
•
When they are rewarded, the reward will be something
they care about
Expectancy Theory
© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
Elizabeth’s boss starts out the day each morning
saying, “Bet you wish you didn’t have to be here,
huh?” Knowing this, which theory gives us insight
as to why Elizabeth may not be motivated at work?
Elizabeth’s boss my well be a Theory X
manager, as s/he assumes employees
© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
If you study really hard and
only get a B on an exam, but
your classmate barely studies
at all and gets an A, what
theory will help explain why
you feel less motivated to go
to class?
What theory would say that this man, who knows
he works hard and is performing well, will be
motivated by a gym membership for being a high
performer?
© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
Expectancy Theory.
Would a gym membership
be considered a motivator
or hygiene factor,
according to Herzberg?
Discuss with a classmate.
Putting It All Together