• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Patient Safety [Internet]

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Membagikan "Patient Safety [Internet]"

Copied!
6
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

55 DAFTAR PUSTAKA

1. International Counsil of Nurse. Patient Safety [Internet]. 2012. p. 1.

Available from: https://www.icn.ch/sites/default/files/inline- files/D05_Patient_Safety_0.pdf

2. World Health Organization. Exploring patient participation in reducing health-care-related safety risks [Internet]. WHO: Geneva. 2013. 190 p.

Available from:

http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Explorin g+patient+participation+in+reducing+health-care-related+safety+risks#0 3. Rafter N, Condell S, Conroy R, O’Connor P, Vaughan D, Williams D.

Adverse events in healthcare: learning from mistakes. QJM [Internet].

2015;108(4):273–7. Available from:

https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/%0Ahcu145.

4. Granel N, Manresa-Domínguez JM, Watson CE, Gómez-Ibáñez R, Bernabeu-Tamayo MD. Nurses’ perceptions of patient safety culture: A mixed-methods study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jun 26;20(1).

5. Komite Nasional Keselamatan Pasien. Sistem pelaporan dan pembelajaran keselamatan nasional (SP2KPN) [Internet]. 2020. Available from:

https://www.kemkes.go.id/resources/download/info-terkini/Rakerkesnas- 2020/02-Side-event/SE_05/Sistem Pelaporan dan Pembelajaran Keselamatan Pasien Nasional (Arjaty Daud).pdf

6. Pratiwi A, Sudiro, Fatmasari EY. Analisis Persepsi Perawat Terhadap Budaya Keselamatan Pasien Dengan Pendekatan Institute For Healthcare Improvement Di RSJD Dr. Amino Gondohutomo Kota Semarang. J Kesehat Masy. 2017;5(1):32–9.

7. Mir-Abellán R, Falcó-Pegueroles A, de la Puente-Martorell ML. Actitudes

(2)

frente a la cultura de seguridad del paciente en el ámbito hospitalario y variables correlacionadas. Gac Sanit [Internet]. 2017;31(2):145–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2016.07.019

8. Sorra J, Famolaro T, Yount ND, Smith SA, Wilson S, Liu H. Hospital Survey on Patient safety Culture : user comparative data based report [Internet].

Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research Quality; 2014. Available from: www.ahrq.gov

9. Ultaria TD, Pawelas Arso S, Sriatmi A. Gambaran Budaya Keselamatan Pasien Di RS Roemani Muhammadiyah Semarang. J Chem Inf Model.

2017;5(1):118–25.

10. Risky D, Hasibuan S. Pelaksanaan budaya keselamatan pasien oleh perawat di instalasi rawat inap rsud deli serdang lubuk pakam tahun 2019 [Internet].

Universitas Sumatera Utara; 2020. Available from:

http://repositori.usu.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/27294/151000197.p df?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

11. Institute of Medicine. The future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health. The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health.

Washington, D. C: The National Academies Press; 2011. 1–671 p.

12. Sherwood G, Zomorodi M. A new mindset for quality and safety: The QSEN competencies redefine nurses’ roles in practice. J Nurs Adm.

2014;44(10):15–22.

13. World Health Organization. Panduan Kurikulum Keselamatan Pasien.

2015;272. Available from:

http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/44641/26/9789241501958_ind.pdf

?ua=1

14. Vaismoradi M, Salsali M, Marck P. Patient safety: Nursing students’

perspectives and the role of nursing education to provide safe care. Int Nurs Rev. 2011;58(4):434–42.

(3)

15. Negara AN. Hubungan Persepsi Perawat tentang Pasien Safety dengan Budaya Keselamatan Pasien di RSUD A.W.Sjahranie Samarinda [Internet].

[Samarinda]: Politeknik Kesehatan Kalimantan Timur; 2017. Available from: http://repository.poltekkes-kaltim.ac.id/746/7/Skripsi Abdurrahman.pdf

16. RI K. Peraturan Mentri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 30 Tahun 2019 Tentang Klasifikasi Dan Perizinan Rumah Sakit. 2019; Available from:

http://hukor.kemkes.go.id/uploads/produk_hukum/PMK_No__30_Th_2019 _ttg_Klasifikasi_dan_Perizinan_Rumah_Sakit.pdf

17. Siswati, Maryati Y. Manajemen Mutu Informasi Kesehatan II : Akreditasi dan Manajemen Resiko [Internet]. Jakarta: KEMENKES RI; 2017. 1–145 p.

Available from: http://bppsdmk.kemkes.go.id/pusdiksdmk/wp- content/uploads/2017/11/MMIK-II_FINAL_SC_26_10_2017.pdf

18. Cahyono U. Kajian Mutu Pelayanan Rumah Sakit Bhineka Bakti Husada Yang Telah Lulus Akreditasi Ditinjau Dari Kriteria Malcolm Baldrige.

Thesis [Internet]. 2012;1–143. Available from:

http://lib.ui.ac.id/file?file=digital/20314715-T31768-Kajian mutu.pdf 19. Kementrian Kesehatan. Permenkes RI Nomor 1691/Menkes.Per/VIII/2011

Tentang Keselamatan Pasien Rumah Sakit. 2011.

20. Sorra J, Gray L, Stragle S, Famolaro T, Yount N, Behm J. AHRQ Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture: User’s Guide. AHRQ Publication.

Rockville, MD: Asosiasi Institusi Pendidikan Ners Indonesia (AIPNI); 2016.

1–45 p.

21. Abood SA, El-magd ANA. A Comparative Study on Factors Influencing Patient Safety Culture among Staff Nurses. IOSR J Nurs Heal Sci.

2018;7(3):1–8.

22. Harsul W, Irwan AM, Sjattar EL. Relationship of Organizational Commitment With Patient Safety Incident Report Culture. J Ilmu

(4)

Keperawatan (Journal Nurs Sci. 2018;6(2):165–70.

23. Horwitz SK, Horwitz IB. The effects of organizational commitment and structural empowerment on patient safety culture: An analysis of a physician cohort. J Heal Organ Manag. 2017;31(1):10–27.

24. Hadi I. Manajemen Keselamatan Pasien [Internet]. Yogyakarta; 2017.

Available from: https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=1144419 25. Mandriani E, Hardisman H, Yetti H. Analisis Dimensi Budaya Keselamatan

Pasien Oleh Petugas Kesehatan di RSUD dr Rasidin Padang Tahun 2018. J Kesehat Andalas. 2019;8(1):131.

26. Rochmah TN, Santi MW, Endaryanto A, Prakoeswa CRS. Budaya Keselamatan Pasien Berdasarkan Indikator Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality di RSUD Dr. Soetomo. J Penelit Kesehat Suara Forikes.

2019;10(Vol 10, No 2 (2019): April 2019):112–8.

27. Al S et. Pengantar Psikologi Sosial. Surabaya: Pusat Penerbitan dan Percetakan Unair; 2012.

28. Karthika Priyadhardshini Jayamala A. K. RLBLPNNKT. Psikologi Persepsi dan Desain Informasi. Int J Physiol. 2018;6(1):2018.

29. Prastisti W., Yuwono S. Psikologi Eksperimen: Konsep, Teori dan Aplikasi.

Surakarta: Muhammadiyah University Press; 2018.

30. Potter PA, Perry AG, Amy M, Patricia AS. Fundamental Of Nursing:

Consep, Proses and Practice. Jakarta; 2010.

31. Berman A, Kozier B, Erb GL, Erb’s K and. Fundamentals Of Nursing (Concept, Process and Practice). Australia: Pearson Australia; 2018.

32. Lau F, Kuziemsky C. Handbook of eHealth evaluation [Internet]. Vol. 17, Http://Www.Mendeley.Com/Research/82799598-F00C-3Ebe-Be49-

D213a647Cfb4/. Victoria: University of Victoria; 2017. 160 p. Available from:

(5)

https://books.google.co.id/books?id=IEXiDgAAQBAJ&pg=PA160&dq=L au,+F.,+%26+Kuziemsky,+C.+(2016).+Handbook+of+eHealth+Evaluation  :+Canada:+University+of+Victoria.&hl=id&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi83q75 w_7tAhWZcn0KHScQB70Q6AEwAHoECAAQAg#v=onepage&q&f=fals e

33. Young M. Quality of literature review and discussion of findings in selected papers on integration of ICT in teaching, role of mentors, and teaching science through science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM).

Educ Res Rev. 2017;12(4):189–201.

34. Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat Universitas Jember. Panduan Literature review untuk skripsi. Jember: Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat Universitas Jember; 2020. 10 p.

35. Jennex ME. Literature reviews and the review process: An editor-in-chiefs perspective. Commun Assoc Inf Syst. 2015;36(July):139–46.

36. Snyder H. Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. J Bus Res [Internet]. 2019;104(March):333–9. Available from:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

37. Cooke A, Smith D, Booth A. Beyond PICO: The SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qual Health Res. 2012;22(10):1435–43.

38. Rehman Y. Difference between Quantitative and Qualitative Research Question- PICO vs. SPIDER. Am Sci Res J Eng Technol Sci [Internet].

2021;77(1):188–99. Available from:

https://www.asrjetsjournal.org/index.php/American_Scientific_Journal/arti cle/view/6730

39. Nursalam, Kusnanto, Mishbahatul E, Yusuf A, Kurniawati ND, Sukartini R, et al. Pedoman Penyusunan Skripsi - Literature Review Dan Tesis - Systematic Review [Internet]. Surabaya: Fakultas Keperawatan Universitas

Airlangga; 2020. 117 p. Available from:

(6)

http://ners.unair.ac.id/site/index.php/download/category/6-bidang- akademik?download=265:pedoman-systematic-dan-literature-review 40. Setiawan N. Pengolahan dan analisis data. Bogor: Inspektorat jendral

departemen pendidikan nasional; 2005. 25–27 p.

41. Harris D. Literature review and research desain. London: Routledge; 2019.

1–160 p.

42. Lau F, Kuziemsky C. Handbook of eHealth Evaluation: An Evidence-based Approach. Canada: University of Victoria; 2017.

43. Kakemam E, Gharaee H, Rajabi MR, Nadernejad M, Khakdel Z, Raeissi P, et al. Nurses’ perception of patient safety culture and its relationship with adverse events: a national questionnaire survey in Iran. BMC Nurs.

2021;20(1):1–11.

44. Maria A, Silva R. Patient safety culture : perception of nursing professionals in high complexity institutions. 2020;73(5):1–8.

45. Ludin DSM, Athirah Bajuri NA. Nurses’ Perception on Patient Safety Culture in Critical Care Area At a Tertiary Hospital in Pahang, Malaysia.

Malaysian J Nurs. 2020;11(4):78–84.

46. Alquwez N, Cruz JP, Almoghairi AM, Al-otaibi RS, Almutairi KO, Alicante JG, et al. Nurses’ Perceptions of Patient Safety Culture in Three Hospitals in Saudi Arabia. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2018;50(4):422–31.

47. Abreu IM de, Rocha RC, Avelino FVSD, Guimarães DBO, Nogueira LT, Madeira MZ de A. Cultura de segurança do paciente em centro cirúrgico:

visão da enfermagem. Rev Gauch Enferm. 2019;40(spe):e20180198.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

7) Setel waktu yang diperlukan untuk pengisian sesuai dengan hasil pengukuran berat jenis elektrolit baterai, ( untuk battery charging yang dilengkapi timer), bila tidak

Asahimas Chemical tidak berpotensi menggunakan dan menghasilkan bahan kimia (produk samping) hexachlorobutadiene (HCBD) ataupun senyawa sinonimnya berdasarkan hasil

Penelitian ini mendeskripsikan data tentang kepribadian guru aqidah akhlak dan tingkah laku siswa menggunakan penilaian absolut yaitu norma yang ditetapkan secara mutlak oleh

Tahap evaluation, penilaian yang dilakukan guru pada pembelajaran dengan model ini antara lain: keterampilan berpikir kritis dan penguasaan konsep siswa, kinerja siswa dalam

Penilaian resiko : proses evaluasi resiko yang ditimbulkan oleh suatu bahaya dengan Penilaian resiko : proses evaluasi resiko yang ditimbulkan oleh suatu bahaya

Wilayah pedesaan sebagai unit perencanaan tersusun atas unsur-unsur penyusunan potensi wilayah yang meliputi sumber daya alam (SDA) dan sumber daya manusia(SDM)

Mula saka iku, kabudayan Jawa kalebu sawijining kabudayan kang sugih karo prodhuk-prodhuk kabudayan kang sinebut tradhisi tutur tinular, yaiku warna-warna pakulinan kang