• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

THE EFFECT OF APPLYING GROUP INVESTIGATION METHOD ON THE STUDENTS ACHIEVEMENT IN READING COMPREHENSION.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "THE EFFECT OF APPLYING GROUP INVESTIGATION METHOD ON THE STUDENTS ACHIEVEMENT IN READING COMPREHENSION."

Copied!
20
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

THE EFFECT OF APPLYING GROUP INVESTIGATION

METHOD ON THE STUDENTS’ACHIEVEMENT IN

READING COMPREHENSION

A THESIS

Submitted to the English Department, Faculty of Languages and Arts, State University of Medan, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements

for the Degree of Sarjana Pendidikan

By:

RASTA ELISA GIRSANG

Registration Number 209321056

ENGLISH DEPARTMENT

FACULTY OF LANGUAGES AND ARTS

STATE UNIVERSITY OF MEDAN

(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

First of all the writer would like to express her praises to Jesus Christ, the

Almighty God source of all the livings. Because of His great love and blessing, the writer could do and finally complete this thesis.

This thesis is aimed to fulfill one of the requirements for the degree of Sarjana Pendidikan (S-1) at the English Department, Faculty of Languages and Arts, State University of Medan.

This thesis would not have been possible nor legible without the dedication and guidance of several individuals who always contributed and

extended their valuable assistances in the preparation and completion of this thesis. The writer’s special appreciation goes out to:

1. Prof. Dr. Ibnu Hajar Damanik, M.Si., the Rector of State University of Medan.

2. Dr. Isda Pramuniati, M.Hum., the Dean of Faculty of Languages and Arts, State University of Medan.

3. Prof. Dr. Hj. Sumarsih, M.Pd,. the Head of English Department, and her academic consultant for years. Rika, S.Pd,. M.Hum,. the Secretary of

English Department, Dra. Meisuri, MA., the Head of English Non-Educational Program and Dra. Masitowarni Siregar, M.Ed., the Head of English Education Program, Faculty of Languages and Arts, State

(7)

4. The writer expresses her special thanks to Prof. Dr. Berlin Sibarani, M.Pd., as her thesis supervisor, for his advice, suggestions, guidance and also encouragement, so that this thesis could have been accomplished. 5. The writer sincerely thanks to her Dad, Alm. Rasiman Girsang, S.Pd and

Mom, Alm. Rahmawati br Sembiring, S.Pd for wonderful love and unimaginable sacrifices. Wish we can also together in heaven. The writer’s

special gratitude also goes to her dearest brother, Rudy Carlo Girsang,

Amd for his prayers, the love and for continuous support, be it financial and moral, during his whole studies up to finish.

6. The Headmaster of SMA Swasta Singosari Delitua, Ir. Gunawan Sunardy, his permission and opportunities in allowing the writer to do observation and to collect data.

7. Eryca Manalu, Shinta Gultom, Jojor Padang, Fransiska Evalina, Astri Sirait, Amelia Nababan, Elma Maranita, Survey Sijabat, and all of her

beloved friends who never let her down and love her so much thank you for being a part of my life. And to all of those who can’t be mention their

name one by one, thank you for their motivation, support, smile, love, and also helping.

Medan, January 2014 The Writer

(8)

ABSTRACT

Girsang, Rasta Elisa. 209321056. The Effect of Applying Group Investigation Method on the Students’ Achievement in Reading Comprehension. A Thesis: English Department. Faculty of Languages and Arts, State University of Medan. 2013.

(9)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER II REVIEW OF LITERATURE ... 6

A. Theoretical Framework ... 6

1. Reading Comprehension ... 6

a.Reading Comprehension as a Process ... 7

b.Factor Affecting Reading Comprehension ... 9

c.Level of Reading Comprehension ... 9

d.Taxonomy Reading Comprehension ... 11

e.Teaching Reading Comprehension... 13

2. Genre of the text ... 15

3. Narrative text ... 21

4. Group Investigation Method ... 24

5. Assessment/ Evaluation for Reading ... 28

B. Conceptual Framework ... 29

C. Hypothesis ... 31

CHAPTER III RESEARCH DESIGN ... 32

A. Research Design ... 32

B. Population and Sample ... 32

C. The Instrument of Collecting Data ... 33

D. The Validity and the Reliability of the Test ... 34

1. The Validity of the Test ... 34

G. Technique for Analyzing Data ... 39

CHAPTER IV DATA ANALYSIS AND RESEARCH FINDINGS ... 40

A. The Data ... 40

B. Data Analysis ... 41

1. Testing Reliability of the Test ... 41

(10)

3. Testing Hypothesis ... 41

C. Research Finding ... 42

CHAPTER V CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTION ... 43

A. Conclusion ... 43

B. Suggestions ... 43

REFERENCES ... 45

(11)

vi

LIST OF TABLES

Table Page

(12)

CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

A. The Background of the Study

Reading is one of the most important skills in language learning besides listening, speaking and writing. Without reading, one cannot access written information. In reading process, students are expected to get knowledge and be

familiar with what the teacher has explained in the content, where as in comprehension the students are expected to have more skills in order to get

meaning in the text. That is the purpose of reading comprehension. Therefore, it is useless if one do not have reading competence, because reading competence enables students to find the information in reading text.

The important point to be made about the reading is reading comprehension. To master reading skill, the readers need good comprehension in

reading activity. In reading comprehension, reader must be able to get a deeper understanding of information that presented in a text. It means that reading comprehension involves thinking process. According to Westwood (2008:31)

reading comprehension is an active thinking process which a reader intentionally constructs meaning to form a deeper understanding of information that presented

in a text. An active thinking process involves the activity of linking of new information to the students’ experience or background knowledge.

(13)

students still get a lack in activating their prior knowledge during the reading process, specifically in reading comprehension. Whereas, the activation of prior knowledge makes up a

great amount of the process of reading comprehension. In this case, teachers have an important role. The teacher should attempt to activate prior knowledge as much as possible to reading text,

allowing students to apply the prior knowledge use while reading.

Because reading comprehension is the important thing in reading, the students are expected to read various texts to get deeper understanding of information or to have knowledge.

Harmer (2003:208) states that students sometimes have low expectation in reading comprehension. The students think that understanding the passage is difficult. And when the

teacher in the past given them a text that they have no interest, then they would predict that the future activities will be boring. So when the teacher told them to tell some information from their reading text, most of them didn’t have idea to tell some information from what they’ve read. For

Indonesian students, reading is still difficult to learn, particularly in reading English material.

Based on the researcher’s experience when researcher was in research in field (PPL), the

researcher found that the students have a difficulty when the students are asks to get some interesting messages from their reading text. Although some students could read and pronounce the words well but they could not understand to comprehend the text well. And the result, most

of them always get bad score in reading comprehension and could not reach minimum passing score (KKM). This condition really proves how bad the students achievement in reading.

Dealing with the fact previously mentioned, the researcher would like to conduct a research by using method that is Group Investigation (GI), it is necessary to provide a model of teaching method that may help students create a good learning atmosphere to take part actively

(14)

Group Investigation is one of cooperative learning method which focused on student’s

participation and activity. According to Sharan and Sharan (1992), Group Investigation is a

cooperative learning method to integrate interaction and communication in the classroom with the process of academic inquiry. The students are taught to work together with their friends.

They work together to achieve the goal or the success which has always been desired by them. It will help the students in reading comprehension ability.

Group Investigation Method will motivate the students to study and several stages of

Group Investigation will open their view of one case and practice critical thinking. In this group investigation method there are 3 concepts: enquiry, knowledge, and the dynamic of the earning

group. The research here is the dynamic of the learning group. The students give the responses the problems and solve it. The knowledge is the learning experience that has been founded directly or indirectly. And the dynamic of the learning group that shows describing a group of

student which has a good interaction and share about their ideas, exchange their experiences, in their opinions.

Things have to do in Group Investigation by Slavin (1995) are: First is growing up the group ability, When they do their homework, every member of group has their own opportunity to show their contribution. In the research, the student will find the information from the inside

or outside class. Then, the students collect the information from every member of the group to do the task. Second is cooperative planning, all of the students having an investigation for their

(15)

also organize the students job and help the students to organize their job and help them when they get the trouble of the learning process in their group.

From the explanation above, this study is designed to conduct out the research to prove whether Group Investigation (GI) Method improves students’ reading comprehension.

B. The Problem of the Study

Based on the previous discussion in the background of the study, a research problem is formulated as the following: “Does the application of Group Investigation method significantly

affect students’ reading comprehension?

C. The Scope of the Study

There are many learning activities that can be conducted by using cooperative learning.

In this study, it is limited only on Group Investigation (GI) method on students reading comprehension.

D. The Objective of the Study

In relation to the problem, the objective of the study is to find out whether Group

Investigation (GI) method significantly affects the students’ reading comprehension.

E. The Significance of the Study

The results of the study are expected to be useful for:

1. English teachers to provide his/her as alternative method to improved his/her methods in

(16)

2. Students to encourage them to be more active and high motivated students. Especially in group work/ teams and increase their ability in reading comprehension by Group

Investigation (GI).

(17)

CHAPTER V

CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS

A. Conclusions

Based on the result of this study, the researcher found that the students’

achievement taught by using Group Investigation Method is higher than the students’ achievement taught by without Group Investigation Method. It is indicated from analyzing the data statistically that the result of calculation of t-test that t-observed

value 4.28 is higher than t-table value 2.00 at the level of significant of 0.05, which implies that the alternative Hypothesis (Ha) is accepted.

B.Suggestions

The study showed that the applying of Group Investigation method could improve the students’ reading comprehension. Based on the conclusion given, the

writer suggests that:

1. English teachers should apply Group Investigation Method in their teaching learning process so that they can improve their students’ reading

comprehension because this method is designed to relate the students’

background knowledge with reading text. So it is expected for the students to understand the story easily

(18)

their background knowledge with reading text. Therefore, the students will find by applying Group Investigation method is easier to comprehend the

text.

(19)

REFERENCES

Anthony, Edward. M. 1963. Approach Method and Technique. English Learning. AnnArbor: University of Michigan Press.

Arikunto, S. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Ary, D.et al. 2010. Introduction to Research in Education. The United Stated of America: Nelson Education.

Berry, J. 2005. Levels of Reading Comprehension. In

http://www.sc4.edu/documents/h7levelsreadingcomp.doc. Accessed on

June, 07th, 2013/13:40:45.

Best, J. W. & Khan, J. V. 2002. Research in Education 7th . New Delhi: Prentice Hall.

Brown, D. 2001. Principle Language and Teaching. New York: Longman.

Brown, H. D. 2004. Language assessment Principles and Classroom Practices. San Francisco: Longman.

Daniel, Zingaro. 2008. Group Investigation: Theory and Practice. Ontario Institute for studies in Education Journal. Toronto. July 18, 2008.

Danielle, S.Mc Manara. 2007. Reading Comprehension Strategies. New Jersey. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Dorn, Linda. 2006. A Close Look at meaning in Reading Comprehension: Arkansas Reading Association An Affiliate Internatioanal Reading Association.

Harmer, Jeremy. 2003. The Practice of English Language Teaching third edition). London: Longman.

Hedge, Tricia. 2003. Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom. London: UOP

(20)

Paltridge, B. 1996. Genre, Text type, and the Language Learning Classroom.Oxford: Oxford University Press, ELT. Journal Volume 50/3 July 1996. Accessed on August 5, 2013

Pardiyono. 2007. Pasti bisa! Teaching genre based writing. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.

Richard, Jack, C. 1998. Beyond Training. New York: Cambridge University Press Joyce, Bruce, and Weil Marsha. 1980. Model of Teaching Second Edition. New

Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

Mikulecky, B.S, and Jeffries, L. 2007. Reading Power. United States of America: Pearson Education.

Linda J. Dorn and Carla Soffos, 2005. Teaching for Deep Comprehension. United States of America: Stenhouse Publishers

Roy Killen. 1998. Effective Teaching Strategies: Lessons from Research and Practice. Australia: Social Science Press.

Sharan, Y & Sharan, S. 1992. Expanding Cooperative Learning Through Group

Investigation. NewYork: Teachers’Collage Press.

Slavin, R.E. 1995. Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice. Boston: Allyn & Bacon

Snow, Catherin. 2002. Reading For Understanding : Toward a Research and Development Program in Reading Comprehension. Pittsburgh: RAND

Westwood Peter S. 2008. What Teacher Need to know about Reading and Writing Difficulties. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.

Gambar

Table               Page 3.1 The Research Design.................................................................................

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Hasil uji ragam kadar gula hari ke-14 menunjukan bahwa suhu penyimpanan memberikan pengaruh yang berbeda nyata terhadap kadar pati, begitu pula dengan pengemasan (Lampiran

Profil Pulau-Pulau Kecil (PulauYoi), Kecamatan Pulau Gebe, Kabupaten HalmaheraTengah, Provinsi Maluku Utara.. Dinas Perikanan dan Kelautan Provinsi

Tingkat Pengetahuan Tentang Penyakit Reumatik dengan Sikap Lansia dalam. Mengatasi Kekambuhan Penyakit Reumatik di Posyandu

perekrutan karyawan dapat menghasilkan SDM yang berkualitas, tergantung dari kualitas sistem perekrutan SDM yang diterapkan di dalam perusahaan.. yang

YAYASAN PENGELOLA PENDIDIKAN BERMAIN PAUD JATENG

PENGUMPULAN DATA & INFORMASI PENDUKUNG AKREDITASI. SDN JATIBENING

Dalam sistem usahatani konservasi akan diwujudkan ciri-ciri sebagai berikut : (1) produksi usahatani cukup tinggi sehingga petani tetap bergairah melanjutkan usahanya, (2)

Disfungsi ereksi adalah kesulitan mencapai kondisi penetrasi. Hal ini setidaknya terjadi 50% dari aktivitas seksual selama rentang. waktu enam bulan. 3)