• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

COMPRESSIVE AND TENSILE STRENGTH OF EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE BEADS CONCRETE

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Membagikan "COMPRESSIVE AND TENSILE STRENGTH OF EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE BEADS CONCRETE"

Copied!
9
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

C O MPRESSIVE A ND TENSILE STRENG TH O F EXPA NDED PO LYSTYRENE BEA DS C O NC RETE

Te ng ku Fitria ni L. Sub ha n *

Ab stra k

Pe ne litia n ini b e tujua n untuk m e m p e la ja ri p ro p e rty d a ri b e to n ring a n ya ng m e ng a nd ung e xp a nd e d p o lystyre ne b e a d s, ya itu kua t te ka n (c o m p re ssive stre ng th) d a n kua t ta rik (te nsile stre ng th). Pro p e rty te rse b ut ke m ud ia n d ib a nd ing ka n d e ng a n b e to n no rm a l (b e to n ta np a e xp a nd e d p o lystyre ne b e a d s) se b a g a i c a m p ura n p e ng o ntro l.

Ha sil p e ne litia n ini m e nunjukka n b a hwa jum la h p o lystyre ne b e a ds ya ng d im a sukka n se b a g a i c a m p ura n b e to n m e m p e ng a ruhi p ro p e rty b e to n; ya itu d a p a t m e nurunka n kua t te ka n b e to n. Te ta p i, p a d a c a m p ura n b e to n d e ng a n 15 % p o lystyre ne b e a d s (Mix II) p a d a 28 ha ri kua t te ka nnya d a p a t b e rta ha n hing g a 86 % d a n kua t ta riknya 87 % jika d ib a nd ing ka n d e ng a n b e to n no rm a l.

Ka ta kunc i: b e to n, p o lystyre ne b e a ds

Abstrac t

The ma in p urp o se o f this inve stig a tio n is to study the p ro p e rtie s (c o mp re ssive a nd te nsile stre ng ths) o f lig htwe ig ht c o nc re te c o nta ining e xp a nd e d p o lystyre ne b e a ds. Its p ro p e rtie s a re c o mp a re d tho se o f the no rma l we ig ht c o nc re te (c o ntro l mix).

The re sults sho we d tha t the a mo unt o f p o lystyre ne b e a ds inc o rp o ra te d in c o nc re te influe nc e the p ro p e rtie s o f ha rde ne d c o nc re te ; tha t is lig htwe ig ht a g g re g a te c o uld re duc e the stre ng th o f c o nc re te . Ho we ve r, the c o mp re ssive stre ng ths o f lig htwe ig ht c o nc re te with 15 % p o lystyre ne b e a ds (Mix II) a t 28 da ys fo r e xa mp le , c o uld ma inta in up to 86 % c o mp a re d to tho se o f no rma l we ig ht c o nc re te , while the te nsile stre ng th wa s 87%.

Ke ywords: c o nc re te , p o lystyre ne b e a ds

* Sta f Pe ng a ja r Jurusa n Te knik Sip il Fa kulta s Te knik Unive rsita s Ta d ula ko , Pa lu

I. Intro duc tio n

1.1. C o m p re ssive Stre ng th

Stre ng th o f c o nc re te is the m o st im p o rta nt, a ltho ug h o the r c ha ra c te ristic m a y a lso b e c ritic a l a nd c a nno t b e ne g le c te d . Stre ng th is a n im p o rta nt ind ic a to r o f q ua lity b e c a use stre ng th is d ire c tly re la te d to the struc ture o f ha rd e ne d c e m e nt p a ste .

Eve n tho ug h stre ng th is no t a d ire c t m e a sure d ura b ility o r d im e nsio na l sta b ility, it ha s a stro ng re la tio nship with the wa te r to c e m e nt ra tio o f the c o nc re te , whic h in turn influe nc e s d ura b ility, d im e nsio na l sta b ility a nd o the r p ro p e rtie s o f c o nc re te (Sha h, S.P. a nd Ahma d , S.H., 1994).

The stre ng th m e a sure d in c o nc re te d e p e nd s o n so m e fa c to rs

inc lud ing the a g e , d e g re e o f hyd ra tio n, ra te o f lo a d ing , me tho d o f te sting , sp e c im e n g e o m e try, a nd the p ro p e rtie s a nd p ro p o rtio ns o f the c o nstitue nt ma te ria ls. Mo stly, c o nc re te stre ng th im p ro ve s with the inc re a se o f a g e .

The stre ng th o f sa tura te d sp e c im e ns m a y ha ve lo we r stre ng th tha n d ry sp e c im e ns. C o m p re ssive stre ng th m e a sure d in im p a c t lo a d ing will b e hig he r tha n tha t in a no rm a l ra te o f lo a d ing . C ub e sp e c im e ns ma y re sult hig he r stre ng th tha n c ylind e r sp e c im e ns.

(2)
(3)

(0% PB) a s a mix c o ntro l, Mix II (15 % PB), Mix III (30 % PB), a nd Mix IV (45 % PB).

Ta b le 3 sho ws the c o nc re te ma te ria ls, whic h we re b a tc he d b y we ig ht fo r e ve ry m ix. The a m o unt o f fine a g g re g a te wa s c ha ng e d fo r d iffe re nt mixe s a c c o rd ing to p e rc e nta g e o f p o lystyre ne b e a d s p ut in the mixe s. The hig he r the a m o unt o f p o lystyre ne b e a d s, the lo we r the a m o unt o f sa nd . Po lystyre ne a g g re g a te c o m p o sitio n is va rie d a m o ng the c o nc re te mixture s to

d e te rmine the m a xim um lig htwe ig ht a g g re g a te ne e d e d c o nc re te a nd to se e the e ffe c t o f p o lystyre ne b e a d s in the hig h stre ng th c o nc re te . The a m o unt o f m a te ria ls a nd wa te r ne e d e d we re c a lc ula te d b e fo re mixing , the m o isture c o nte nt a nd a b so rp tio n c a p a c ity o f a g g re g a te we re c a rrie d o ut. The n, a d a y b e fo re mixing c o nc re te , the c o a rse a nd fine a g g re g a te we re a ir d rie d to a c hie ve unifo rm m o isture c o nte nt.

Ta b le 2. Mix C o m p o sitio n (kg / m3)

Ma te ria ls Mix I Mix II Mix III Mix IV

C e me nt 448 457 465 464

Fly Ash 102 104 106 106

Wa te r 140 143 145 145

Sup e rp la stic ise r 9.9 10.1 10.3 10.3

Fine Ag g re g a te 626 541 453 356

C o a rse Ag g re g a te 1088 1112 1128 1128

Po lystyre ne Be a d s 0 208 3.92 6.03

W+S/ C +F 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27

A/ C +F 3.12 2.95 2.77 2.70

Ta b le 3. Ba tc h we ig ht o f m a te ria ls (kg ) fo r e a c h m ix

Ma te ria ls Mix I

(0% PB)

Mix II (15% PB)

Mix III (30% PB)

Mix IV (45% PB) C o a rse

Ag g re g a te 37.4 37.4 37.4 37.4

Fine Ag g re g a te 21.5 18.2 15 11.8

Po lystyre ne Be a d s 0 0.07 0.13 0.2

C e me nt 15.4 15.4 15.4 15.4

Fly a sh 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5

Sup e rp la stic ise r 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34

(4)

Ho we ve r, b e fo re p o uring c o nc re te m ixture it is e sse ntia l to d o m o isture c o nte nt te sts fo r the c o a rse a nd fine a g g re g a te s in o rd e r to a d just wa te r c o nte nt. The m o isture c o nte nt o f c o a rse sa nd just b e fo re p o uring c o nc re te fo r e xa m p le wa s 9 %, whic h is hig h wa te r a b so rp tio n, so the a mo unt o f wa te r fo r mixture sho uld b e re d uc e d . Fo r fine sa nd , o n the c o ntra ry, it wa s ve ry d ry with the m o isture c o nte nt wa s m uc h lo we r, tha t wa s 0.05 %. The re fo re sp e c ific a mo unt o f wa te r sho uld b e a d d e d .

Fo r Mix II, III, a nd IV, the p o lystyre ne b e a d s we re sp re a d e d e ve nly b e fo re the c o a rse a g g re g a te wa s a d d e d . Afte r mixing o f c o nc re te , the te m p e ra ture o f mixture wa s m e a sure d . The fre sh c o nc re te p ro p e rtie s (we t d e nsity slum p ) we re im m e d ia te ly te ste d a c c o rd a nc e with AS 1012 (1970). The c o nc re te te m p e ra ture wa s fo und to

18 oC .

3. C o m pre ssive Stre ng th

All c o mp re ssive stre ng th te sts in this stud y we re p e rfo rme d b y using Ave ry unive rsa l te sting m a c hine with lo a d ing ra te 20±2 MPa p e r minute a c c o rd ing to AS 1012.9-1999. The te st

sp e c im e ns we re 3 c ub e s o f 100x100x100 m m fo r e a c h a g e , te ste d a t 3, 7, 28, a nd

56 d a ys a t the ro o m te m p e ra ture o f 20o

C a nd 65 % RH. Afte r re m o va l fro m the c uring e nviro nm e nt, the surp lus wa te r o n a ll c ub e s wa s wip e d o ut a s so o n a s p o ssib le a nd d ime nsio ns a nd we ig ht we re d e te rm ine d .

3.1 C o m p re ssive stre ng th d e ve lo p m e nt with a g e

C o mp re ssive stre ng th

d e ve lo p m e nt re sults a re sum m a rize d in b o th Ta b le 4 a nd Fig ure 3, while re la tive c o mp re ssive stre ng th d e ve lo p me nt with a g e is sho wn in Ta b le 5 a nd Fig ure 4. It is sho wn tha t the c o m p re ssive stre ng th o f a ll c o nc re te mixture s inc re a se d with the inc re a se o f a g e .

It is c le a r fro m the Ta b le 4 tha t the la rg e r the a m o unt o f p o lystyre ne b e a d s in c o nc re te , the le sse r the c o mp re ssive stre ng th. As e xp e c te d , the no rm a l we ig ht c o nc re te ha s the la rg e st c o mp re ssive stre ng th fo r a ll d a ys c o mp a re d to lig htwe ig ht c o nc re te . At 28 d a ys, it wa s fo und tha t c o mp re ssive stre ng th o f Mix II, Mix III, a nd Mix IV c o m p a re d to c o ntro l c o nc re te we re 86%, 65%, a nd 59%, re sp e c tive ly.

Fig ure 1. C o m p re ssive stre ng th te st Fig ure 2. Sp litting o f sp e c ime n und e r

(5)

In Mix I, a t 3 d a ys the c o mp re ssive stre ng th wa s 53 MPa , the n a t 28 d a ys it inc re a se d c o nsid e ra b ly to 80 MPa . During the ne xt 28 d a ys the stre ng th wa s inc re a se d to 81 MPa . In Mix II a nd Mix III o n the o the r ha nd , the c o mp re ssive stre ng th inc re a se d fro m 28 d a ys to 56 d a ys a b o ut 6 MPa a nd 5 MPa , re sp e c tive ly.

The c o mp re ssive stre ng th o f c o ntro l c o nc re te inc re a se d fro m 53 MPa

a t 3 d a ys to 80 MPa a t 28 d a ys (inc re a se d o f 51%). Ho we ve r, with 15% o f fine a g g re g a te re p la c e d b y p o lystyre ne b e a d s, the 28-d a y stre ng th o f Mix II wa s inc re a se d b y 60.5% fro m its 3-d a y stre ng th (69 MPa ). Whe n the a m o unt o f lig htwe ig ht a g g re g a te inc re a se d up to 30% to re p la c e the fine a g g re g a te (Mix III); the inc re a se o f c o m p re ssive stre ng th a t 28 d a ys is 40.5%.

Ta b le 4. C o m p re ssive stre ng th d e ve lo p m e nt with a g e

Mixture s C o mp re ssive stre ng th (Mp a )

3 d a ys 7 d a ys 28 d a ys 56 d a ys

Mix I 53 67 80 81

Mix II 43 51 69 75

Mix III 37 47 52 57

Mix IV 28 33 39 42

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

0 7 14 21 28 35 42 49 56 63

Age (Days)

C

ube

s C

o

m

p

ressi

ve

S

tr

e

n

g

th

(

M

P

a

)

Mix I

Mix II

Mix III

Mix IV

(6)

Ta b le 5. Re la tive c o mp re ssive stre ng th d e ve lo p m e nt with a g e

Mixture s

Re la tive c o mp re ssive stre ng th d e ve lo p m e nt with a g e

3 d a ys 7 d a ys 28 d a ys 56 d a ys

Mix I 1.00 1.26 1.51 1.53

Mix II 1.00 1.19 1.60 1.74

Mix III 1.00 1.27 1.40 1.54

Mix IV 1.00 1.18 1.40 1.50

1.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.60 1.70 1.80

0 7 14 21 28 35 42 49 56 63

Age (days)

R

e

lat

ive

st

re

n

g

th

Mix I

Mix II

Mix III

Mix IV

Fig ure 4. Re la tive c o m p re ssive stre ng th d e ve lo p m e nt with re sp e c t to 3-d a y stre ng th

Ta b le 6. Re la tive c o m p re ssive stre ng th o f p o lystyre ne a g g re g a te c o nc re te

Mixture s

Re la tive stre ng th

3 d a ys 7 d a ys 28 d a ys 56 d a ys

Mix I 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Mix II 0.81 0.76 0.86 0.93

Mix III 0.70 0.70 0.65 0.71

(7)

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2

0 7 14 21 28 35 42 49 56 63

Age (days)

R

e

la

ti

ve

str

e

n

g

th

Mix I Mix II Mix III Mix IV

Fig ure 5. Re la tive c o m p re ssive stre ng th o f p o lystyre ne a g g re g a te c o nc re te

3.2 Re la tive c o mp re ssive stre ng th o f

p o lystyre ne a g g re g a te c o nc re te The re la tive c o mp re ssive stre ng th o f p o lystyre ne a g g re g a te c o nc re te is sho wn in Ta b le 6 a nd Fig ure 5. As re p re se nt in Ta b le 6, Mix I ha s a ro le a s c o ntro l mixture . Fo r Mix II, the re la tive d e ve lo p m e nt o f c o m p re ssive stre ng th va rie d b e twe e n 76% a nd 93%, while Mix III ha s lo we r va ria tio n o f stre ng th d e ve lo p me nt; fro m 65% to 71%. In Mix IV, the d e ve lo p m e nt o f stre ng th e ve n lo we r, va rie d a mo ng 50%.

4.Te nsile Stre ng th o f c o nc re te a t 28 da ys

In this inve stig a tio n, te nsile

stre ng th te st wa s d o ne with 3 c ylind e rs o f 100x200 mm fo r e a c h mix a t the a g e o f

28 d a ys a fte r c ure d in 20 oC wa te r, using

ind ire c t te nsile te st, a c c o rd a nc e with AS 1012.10-2000. Te ste d we re d o ne in ro o m

te m p e ra ture o f 20 oC a nd 65% RH. Fig ure

2 sho ws o ne o f the te nsile stre ng th te sts o f c o nc re te .

Afte r ta ke n o ut fro m the wa te r c uring a nd the surp lus wa te r wa s wip e d o ut, the m e a n d ia m e te r a nd le ng ths o f sp e c im e ns we re m e a sure d . The

ha rd b o a rd b e a ring strip s we re p la c e d b e twe e n the p la te n o f the m a c hine a nd sp e c im e n to a vo id lo c a l c rushing . The lo a d is a t the ra te o f 1.5±0.15 MPa p e r min.

Ta b le 7 a nd Fig ure 6 sho w the re sults o f te nsile stre ng th o f c o nc re te a t 28 d a ys. It is c le a r fro m the b a r c ha rt tha t the hig he r the a m o unt o f p o lystyre ne b e a d s in c o nc re te mixture , the lo we r the te nsile stre ng th. Re la tive te nsile stre ng th o f lig htwe ig ht c o nc re te c o m p a re d to no rm a l we ig ht c o nc re te a re sho wn in Ta b le 8, while Ta b le 9 re p re se nts the c o m p a riso n b e twe e n te nsile stre ng th a nd 28 d a ys c o mp re ssive stre ng th o f a ll c o nc re te mixture s a s we ll a s the ra tio b e twe e n the m .

(8)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Mix I Mix II Mix III Mix IV

In

d

ir

e

c

t t

e

n

s

ile

s

tr

e

n

g

th

(

M

P

a

)

Fig ure 6. Te nsile Stre ng th a t 28 d a ys

Ta b le 7. Te nsile stre ng th o f c o nc re te mixe s a t 28 d a ys

Mixture s Te nsile stre ng th (MPa )

Mix I 5.53

Mix II 4.80

Mix III 4.72

Mix IV 3.40

Ta b le 8. Re la tive te nsile stre ng th o f lig htwe ig ht c o nc re te to no rm a l we ig ht c o nc re te a t 28 d a ys

Mixture s Mix I Mix II Mix III Mix IV

Te nsile Stre ng th (MPa ) 5.53 4.80 4.72 3.40

Re la tive stre ng th 1.00 0.87 0.85 0.62

4.1 Re la tive te nsile stre ng th

It is c le a r fro m Ta b le 8 tha t te nsile stre ng th d e ve lo p m e nt up to 28 d a ys o f c o nc re te with the lo we st p o lystyre ne b e a d s c o nte nt (Mix II) wa s the hig he st a m o ng lig htwe ig ht c o nc re te a s m uc h a s 87%. Sub se q ue ntly, the hig he r the lig htwe ig ht a g g re g a te in c o nc re te , the lo we r the re la tive stre ng th.

4.2 Te nsile stre ng th to c o mp re ssive

stre ng th ra tio

As sho wn in Ta b le 9 a nd Fig ure 7, the hig he r the c o m p re ssive stre ng th, the hig he r the te nsile stre ng th. The re la tio nship b e twe e n te nsile stre ng th

a nd c o m p re ssive stre ng th is no n-line a r (ft

= A (fc)0.3. The ra tio b e twe e n te nsile

(9)

Gambar

Fig ure  2. Splitting  o f spe c ime n unde r                  te nsio n
Fig ure  4.  Re la tive  c o mpre ssive  stre ng th de ve lo pme nt with re spe c t to  3-da y stre ng th
Fig ure  5.  Re la tive  c o mpre ssive  stre ng th o f po lystyre ne  a g g re g a te  c o nc re te
Fig ure  7. Co rre la tio n b e twe e n c o mpre ssive  a nd te nsile  stre ng th

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Untuk mengetahui nilai kuat tekan dan modulus elastisitas beton dengan penambahan butiran styrofoam dan memberikan infor- masi tentang penggunaan styrofoam dalam pembuatan

The measured pulse velocity PV of each saturated-surface dry specimen was used to predict its compressive strength by using a suitable UPV-strength equation that is representative of

This study found that the use of glass powder as a substitute for fine aggregate can be used as a substitute for normal concrete in terms of compressive strength and reduce glass

You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially 51 The

Then a research will be carried out by replacing the predetermined composition, namely with fine aggregate, artificial aggregate, F type fly ash, cement, and additional superplasticizer

In this project, the properties and behavior of foam concrete containing fixed percentage of expanded polystyrene was investigated.. The properties studied were compressive strength,

Effects of Aggregate Size on Concrete Tensile Strength by Mohd Amin Bin Muktar A project dissertation submitted to the Civil Engineering Programme Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS in

Figure 3: Schematic of LVDTs and SGs Setup 2.2.2 Compression Testing Fifteen 15 specimens including control samples, full CFRP confined concrete column and partial CFRP confined