• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Karakteristik Penderita Stroke Hemoragik (SH) Rawat Inap di RSUD Raden Mattaher Provinsi Jambi Tahun 2015

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "Karakteristik Penderita Stroke Hemoragik (SH) Rawat Inap di RSUD Raden Mattaher Provinsi Jambi Tahun 2015"

Copied!
27
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)

Frequency Table

Umurk

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent Valid < 45 tahun 17 13.4 13.4 13.4

45-59 tahun 49 38.6 38.6 52.0 60-74 tahun 37 29.1 29.1 81.1 75-90 tahun 24 18.9 18.9 100.0 Total 127 100.0 100.0

UmurA

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent Valid < 45 tahun 17 13.4 13.4 13.4

>= 45 tahun 110 86.6 86.6 100.0 Total 127 100.0 100.0

Jenis Kelamin

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent Valid Laki-laki 73 57.5 57.5 57.5

Perempuan 54 42.5 42.5 100.0 Total 127 100.0 100.0

Agama

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid Islam 104 81.9 81.9 81.9

Kristen 23 18.1 18.1 100.0

Total 127 100.0 100.0

Pekerjaan

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent Valid Tidak bekerja/Sekolah/IRT 29 22.8 22.8 22.8

TNI/POLRI/PNS/BUMN/Pens iunan

39 30.7 30.7 53.5

Pegawai swasta 13 10.3 10.3 63.8

Wiraswasta/Dagang/Jasa 24 18.9 18.9 82.7

Petani/Nelayan 17 13.4 13.4 96.1

Buruh 5 3.9 3.9 100.0

(6)

StatusPerkawinan

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent Valid Kawin 104 81.9 81.9 81.9

Belum Kawin 5 3.9 3.9 85.8

Janda/Duda 18 14.2 14.2 100.0 Total 127 100.0 100.0

Tempat Tinggal

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Kota Jambi 76 59.8 59.8 59.8

Luar Kota Jambi 51 40.2 40.2 100.0

Total 127 100.0 100.0

Penyakit Terdahulu

HT

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent Valid Ada 120 94.5 94.5 94.5

Tidak Ada 7 5.5 5.5 100.0 Total 127 100.0 100.0

DM

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid Ada 32 25.2 25.2 25.2

Tidak Ada 95 74.8 74.8 100.0 Total 127 100.0 100.0

Pernah Stroke

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid Ada 30 23.6 23.6 23.6

Tidak Ada 97 76.4 76.4 100.0 Total 127 100.0 100.0

Penyakit Jantung

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid Ada 12 9.4 9.4 9.4

(7)

Lainnya

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid Ada 8 6.3 6.3 6.3

Tidak Ada 119 93.7 93.7 100.0 Total 127 100.0 100.0

Keluhan Utama

NyeriKepala /Nausea/ Muntah

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid Ada 70 55.1 55.1 55.1

Tidak ada 57 44.9 44.9 100.0 Total 127 100.0 100.0

Kesadaran menurun

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid Ada 79 62.2 62.2 62.2

Tidak Ada 48 37.8 37.8 100.0 Total 127 100.0 100.0

Gangguan gerak dan atau bicara

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid Ada 80 63.0 63.0 63.0

Tidak Ada 47 37.0 37.0 100.0 Total 127 100.0 100.0

Koma

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid Ada 19 15.0 15.0 15.0

(8)

Keadaan Medis

Tekanan Darah Sistolik

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent Valid <120 mmHg (normal) 1 .8 .8 .8

120-139 mmHg (prehipertensi)

8 6.3 6.3 7.1

>=140 mmHg (hipertensi) 118 92.9 92.9 100.0

Total 127 100.0 100.0

Tekanan Darah Diastolik

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent Valid 80-89 mmHg (prehipertensi) 8 6.3 6.3 6.3

>=90 mmHg (hipertensi) 119 93.7 93.7 100.0

Total 127 100.0 100.0

Kadar Gula Darah Sewaktu

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent Valid <100 mg/dl (bukan DM) 3 2.4 2.4 2.4

100-199 mg/dl (belum pasti DM)

93 73.2 73.2 75.6

>=200 mg/dl (DM) 31 24.4 24.4 100.0

Total 127 100.0 100.0

Kolesterol Total

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent Valid <200 mg/dl (Normal) 40 31.5 31.5 31.5

200-239 mg/dl (Perbatasan) 51 40.2 40.2 71.7

>=240 (Tinggi) 36 28.3 28.3 100.0

Total 127 100.0 100.0

Triglriserida

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent Valid <150 mg/dl (Normal) 82 64.6 64.6 64.6

150-249 mg/dl (Perbatasan) 37 29.1 29.1 93.7 >=250 mg/dl (Tinggi) 8 6.3 6.3 100.0

(9)

Kadar LDL

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent Valid Perdarahan intraserebral 88 69.3 69.3 69.3

Perdarahan subarakhanoid 39 30.7 30.7 100.0

Total 127 100.0 100.0

LetakPerdarahan

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Hemisfer/Lobar & Ganglia Basalis

14 11.0 11.0 94.5

Hemisfer/Lobar & Serebellum 2 1.6 1.6 96.1 Hemisfer/Lobar & Batang

Otak

4 3.1 3.1 99.2

Ganglia Basalis & Batang Otak

1 .8 .8 100.0

(10)

Penatalaksanaan Medis

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent Valid Tindakan Operatif 3 2.4 2.4 2.4

Tindakan Konservatif 124 97.6 97.6 100.0

Total 127 100.0 100.0

Statistic LRW

N Valid 127

Missing 0

Mean 5.88

Median 5.00

Std. Deviation 4.705

Variance 22.137

Sumber Biaya

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent Valid Biaya sendiri 30 23.6 23.6 23.6

Biaya asuransi JKN 97 76.4 76.4 100.0

Total 127 100.0 100.0

Asal Rujukan

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent Valid Rumah sakit 46 36.2 36.2 36.2

Puskesmas 11 8.7 8.7 44.9

Bukan rujukan 70 55.1 55.1 100.0 Total 127 100.0 100.0

Keadaan Sewaktu Pulang

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent Valid Pulang berobat jalan 19 15.0 15.0 15.0

Pulang atas permintaan sendiri

26 20.4 20.4 35.4

Meninggal 82 64.6 64.6 100.0

(11)

KSP sesudah dilakukan penggabungan sel

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

TDSistolik * Umur Crosstabulation

UmurA

Total < 45 tahun >= 45 tahun

TDSisKk <140 mmHg

(Normal+Prehipertensi)

sided) Point Probability Pearson Chi-Square .043a 1 .835 1.000 .655

Continuity Correctionb .000 1 1.000

Likelihood Ratio .045 1 .831 1.000 .655

Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .655

Linear-by-Linear Association .043c 1 .836 1.000 .655 .393 N of Valid Cases 127

a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1,20. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

(12)

TDDiastolik*Umur

UmurA

Total < 45 tahun >= 45 tahun

TDDiask 80-89 mmHg (prehipertensi) Count 0 8 8 Expected Count 1.1 6.9 8.0 % within TDDiask .0% 100.0% 100.0% % within UmurA .0% 7.3% 6.3% % of Total .0% 6.3% 6.3% >=90 mmHg (hipertensi) Count 17 102 119 Expected Count 15.9 103.1 119.0 % within TDDiask 14.3% 85.7% 100.0% % within UmurA 100.0% 92.7% 93.7% % of Total 13.4% 80.3% 93.7%

Total Count 17 110 127

Expected Count 17.0 110.0 127.0 % within TDDiask 13.4% 86.6% 100.0% % within UmurA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 13.4% 86.6% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(1-sided) Point Probability Pearson Chi-Square 1.319a 1 .251 .379 .306

Continuity Correctionb .375 1 .540

Likelihood Ratio 2.381 1 .123 .379 .306

Fisher's Exact Test .596 .306

Linear-by-Linear Association 1.309c 1 .253 .379 .306 .306 N of Valid Cases 127

a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1,07. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

(13)

Kadar Gula Darah Sewaktu*Umur

UmurA

Total < 45 tahun >= 45 tahun

GDSKk <200 mg/dl (bukan DM+belum pasti DM)

Count 14 82 96

Expected Count 12.9 83.1 96.0 % within GDSKk 14.6% 85.4% 100.0% % within UmurA 82.4% 74.5% 75.6% % of Total 11.0% 64.6% 75.6% >=200 mg/dl (DM) Count 3 28 31 Expected Count 4.1 26.9 31.0 % within GDSKk 9.7% 90.3% 100.0% % within UmurA 17.6% 25.5% 24.4% % of Total 2.4% 22.0% 24.4%

Total Count 17 110 127

Expected Count 17.0 110.0 127.0 % within GDSKk 13.4% 86.6% 100.0% % within UmurA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 13.4% 86.6% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(1-sided) Point Probability Pearson Chi-Square .486a 1 .486 .563 .360

Continuity Correctionb .155 1 .693

Likelihood Ratio .517 1 .472 .563 .360

Fisher's Exact Test .762 .360

Linear-by-Linear Association .483c 1 .487 .563 .360 .202 N of Valid Cases 127

a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4,15. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

(14)

Kolesterol Total * Umur Crosstabulation

UmurA

Total < 45 tahun >= 45 tahun

Kk <200 mg/dl (Normal) Count 3 37 40 Expected Count 5.4 34.6 40.0 % within Kk 7.5% 92.5% 100.0% % within UmurA 17.6% 33.6% 31.5% % of Total 2.4% 29.1% 31.5% 200-239 mg/dl (Perbatasan) Count 7 44 51 Expected Count 6.8 44.2 51.0 % within Kk 13.7% 86.3% 100.0% % within UmurA 41.2% 40.0% 40.2% % of Total 5.5% 34.6% 40.2%

>=240 (Tinggi) Count 7 29 36

Expected Count 4.8 31.2 36.0 % within Kk 19.4% 80.6% 100.0% % within UmurA 41.2% 26.4% 28.3% % of Total 5.5% 22.8% 28.3%

Total Count 17 110 127

Expected Count 17.0 110.0 127.0 % within Kk 13.4% 86.6% 100.0% % within UmurA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 13.4% 86.6% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(1-sided) Point Probability Pearson Chi-Square 2.340a 2 .310 .328

Likelihood Ratio 2.416 2 .299 .309

Fisher's Exact Test 2.319 .326

Linear-by-Linear Association 2.320b 1 .128 .134 .088 .043 N of Valid Cases 127

(15)

Trigliserida*Umur

UmurA

Total < 45 tahun >= 45 tahun

TKk <150 mg/dl (Normal) Count 13 69 82 Expected Count 11.0 71.0 82.0 % within TKk 15.9% 84.1% 100.0% % within UmurA 76.5% 62.7% 64.6% % of Total 10.2% 54.3% 64.6% >=150 mg/dl

(Perbatasan+Tinggi)

Count 4 41 45

Expected Count 6.0 39.0 45.0 % within TKk 8.9% 91.1% 100.0% % within UmurA 23.5% 37.3% 35.4% % of Total 3.1% 32.3% 35.4%

Total Count 17 110 127

Expected Count 17.0 110.0 127.0 % within TKk 13.4% 86.6% 100.0% % within UmurA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 13.4% 86.6% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(1-sided) Point Probability Pearson Chi-Square 1.216a 1 .270 .296 .205

Continuity Correctionb .689 1 .406

Likelihood Ratio 1.286 1 .257 .296 .205

Fisher's Exact Test .414 .205

Linear-by-Linear Association 1.206c 1 .272 .296 .205 .125 N of Valid Cases 127

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6,02. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

(16)

Kadar LDL*Umur

UmurA

Total < 45 tahun >= 45 tahun

LDLk <130 mg/dl (Normal) Count 4 41 45 Expected Count 6.0 39.0 45.0 % within LDLk 8.9% 91.1% 100.0% % within UmurA 23.5% 37.3% 35.4% % of Total 3.1% 32.3% 35.4% 130-159 mg/dl (Perbatasan) Count 7 38 45 Expected Count 6.0 39.0 45.0 % within LDLk 15.6% 84.4% 100.0% % within UmurA 41.2% 34.5% 35.4% % of Total 5.5% 29.9% 35.4%

>160 mg/dl (Tinggi) Count 6 31 37 Expected Count 5.0 32.0 37.0 % within LDLk 16.2% 83.8% 100.0% % within UmurA 35.3% 28.2% 29.1% % of Total 4.7% 24.4% 29.1%

Total Count 17 110 127

Expected Count 17.0 110.0 127.0 % within LDLk 13.4% 86.6% 100.0% % within UmurA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 13.4% 86.6% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(1-sided) Point Probability

Pearson Chi-Square 1.223a 2 .542 .612

Likelihood Ratio 1.292 2 .524 .612

Fisher's Exact Test 1.302 .582

Linear-by-Linear Association .990b 1 .320 .336 .203 .079 N of Valid Cases 127

(17)

Kadar HDL*Umur

UmurA

Total < 45 tahun >= 45 tahun

HDLKk >45 mg/dl (Normal) Count 8 51 59 Expected Count 7.9 51.1 59.0 % within HDLKk 13.6% 86.4% 100.0% % within UmurA 47.1% 46.4% 46.5% % of Total 6.3% 40.2% 46.5% <=45 mg/dl

(Perbatasan+Rendah)

Count 9 59 68

Expected Count 9.1 58.9 68.0 % within HDLKk 13.2% 86.8% 100.0% % within UmurA 52.9% 53.6% 53.5% % of Total 7.1% 46.5% 53.5%

Total Count 17 110 127

Expected Count 17.0 110.0 127.0 % within HDLKk 13.4% 86.6% 100.0% % within UmurA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 13.4% 86.6% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(1-sided) Point Probability Pearson Chi-Square .003a 1 .957 1.000 .580

Continuity Correctionb .000 1 1.000

Likelihood Ratio .003 1 .957 1.000 .580

Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .580

Linear-by-Linear Association .003c 1 .958 1.000 .580 .205 N of Valid Cases 127

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7,90. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

(18)

KSP * Umur Crosstabulation

UmurA

Total < 45 tahun >= 45 tahun

KSP2 PBJ+PAPS Count 7 38 45

Expected Count 6.0 39.0 45.0 % within KSP2 15.6% 84.4% 100.0% % within UmurA 41.2% 34.5% 35.4% % of Total 5.5% 29.9% 35.4%

Meninggal Count 10 72 82

Expected Count 11.0 71.0 82.0 % within KSP2 12.2% 87.8% 100.0% % within UmurA 58.8% 65.5% 64.6% % of Total 7.9% 56.7% 64.6%

Total Count 17 110 127

Expected Count 17.0 110.0 127.0 % within KSP2 13.4% 86.6% 100.0% % within UmurA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 13.4% 86.6% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(1-sided) Point Probability Pearson Chi-Square .283a 1 .595 .786 .391

Continuity Correctionb .067 1 .795

Likelihood Ratio .278 1 .598 .786 .391

Fisher's Exact Test .596 .391

Linear-by-Linear Association .281c 1 .596 .786 .391 .182 N of Valid Cases 127

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6,02. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

(19)

KSP * CT Crosstabulation

CT

Total Perdarahan

intraserebral

Perdarahan subarakhanoid

KSP Pulang berobat jalan Count 8 11 19 Expected Count 13.2 5.8 19.0 % within KSP 42.1% 57.9% 100.0% % within CT 9.1% 28.2% 15.0% % of Total 6.3% 8.7% 15.0% Pulang atas permintaan

sendiri

Count 16 10 26

Expected Count 18.0 8.0 26.0 % within KSP 61.5% 38.5% 100.0% % within CT 18.2% 25.6% 20.5% % of Total 12.6% 7.9% 20.5%

Meninggal Count 64 18 82

Expected Count 56.8 25.2 82.0 % within KSP 78.0% 22.0% 100.0% % within CT 72.7% 46.2% 64.6% % of Total 50.4% 14.2% 64.6%

Total Count 88 39 127

Expected Count 88.0 39.0 127.0 % within KSP 69.3% 30.7% 100.0% % within CT 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 69.3% 30.7% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value Df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(1-sided) Point Probability Pearson Chi-Square 10.289a 2 .006 .006

Likelihood Ratio 9.832 2 .007 .009

Fisher's Exact Test 9.911 .007

Linear-by-Linear Association 10.190b 1 .001 .002 .001 .001 N of Valid Cases 127

(20)

KSP * PenatalaksanaanMedis Crosstabulation

Pulang atas permintaan sendiri

sided) Point Probability Pearson Chi-Square 1.686a 2 .430 .430

Likelihood Ratio 2.664 2 .264 .430

Fisher's Exact Test .749 1.000

Linear-by-Linear Association 1.410b 1 .235 .342 .266 .266 N of Valid Cases 127

(21)

KSP2 * PM Crosstabulation

PM

Total Tindakan

Operatif

Tindakan Konservatif

KSP2 PBJ+PAPS Count 0 45 45

Expected Count 1.1 43.9 45.0 % within KSP2 .0% 100.0% 100.0% % within PM .0% 36.3% 35.4% % of Total .0% 35.4% 35.4%

Meninggal Count 3 79 82

Expected Count 1.9 80.1 82.0 % within KSP2 3.7% 96.3% 100.0% % within PM 100.0% 63.7% 64.6% % of Total 2.4% 62.2% 64.6%

Total Count 3 124 127

Expected Count 3.0 124.0 127.0 % within KSP2 2.4% 97.6% 100.0% % within PM 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 2.4% 97.6% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(1-sided) Point Probability Pearson Chi-Square 1.686a 1 .194 .308 .266

Continuity Correctionb .473 1 .492

Likelihood Ratio 2.664 1 .103 .308 .266

Fisher's Exact Test .552 .266

Linear-by-Linear Association 1.673c 1 .196 .308 .266 .266 N of Valid Cases 127

a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1,06. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

(22)

Oneway

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

Test of Homogeneity of Variances Lama Rawatan Within Groups 2031.311 124 16.382

Total 2789.228 126

Pulang berobat jalan 19 85.61 Pulang atas permintaan

sendiri Chi-Square 33.538

Df 2

(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
(27)

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Pendekatan saintifik digunakan dalam pembelajaran menulis karena melalui pendektan saintifiik peserta didik diajak untuk memiliki konsep-konsep dasar menulis yag sesuai

data base survei awal pangan potensial (pangan potensial yang dimaksud adalah pangan yang secara signifikan berhubungan dengan kondisi penyakit atau gejala klinis tertentu).. 

Strategi atau metode adalah cara yang digunakan untuk menyampaikan materi pelajaran dalam upaya mencapai tujuan kurikulum. Strategi dalam pelaksanaan menempati

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah memetakan sebaran lamun di perairan Pulau Pari dengan menggunakan citra satelit ALOS dan melakukan pengamatan kondisi lamun berdasarkan

jumlah produksi dihasilkan yang tidak sesuai dengan pendapatan yang diterima.. Akibat minat petani terhadap komoditas kedelai menurun drastis, petani

Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Saksi Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan. Berencana belum pernah

perilaku konsumen terutama persepsi apa yang akan timbul terhadap restoran. secara keseluruhan dengan melakukan penelitian pasar, sehingga dapat

Oleh sebab itu di samping model pembelajaran yang cocok dan proses pembelajaran yang benar perlu ada sistem penilaian yang baik dan terencana (Surapranata, 2005: 1)...