• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

The Real History Behind the Tẻmplars

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2019

Membagikan "The Real History Behind the Tẻmplars"

Copied!
450
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)
(2)
(3)

Praise for

The Real History Behind the Da Vinci Code:

“If,likeSamCookesang,you‘don’tknowmuchabouthistory,’Newman’s encyclopedic,A­to­Zlookattopicsrangingfrom‘Apocrypha’to‘Wren, Christopher’providesperspectiveandinsight.” —PittsburghTribune­Review

“Wittyandcharming,butnonethelessrationalinexplanationandcomplete inbackgroundresearch,TheRealHistoryBehindtheDaVinciCodeseeksnot

somuchtorefutethenovel,buttoelucidateonthetruth,andnotsomuch todisparagethemistakesofMr.Brownbuttomakereadersrealizethatthe historyisbiggerthananyoneperson,popularnovelistsincluded.”

—BusinessWorld

“Thebook...givesthetruthabouttopicsusedinBrown’sfiction.... Well­writtenandprecise,itistheworkofawomanwhowriteswhatshe

knows.” —StatesmanJournal(Oregon)

“ForfansofDanBrown’spopularTheDaVinciCode,SharanNewman’sThe RealHistoryBehindtheDaVinciCodeisamust­havecompanion.”

—TheSundayOregonian

“Newmanhasarrangedherdiscussionofthepeople,places,andeventsin

TheDaVinciCodeinanencyclopedicformat,creatingabookthatisboth

accessibleandfuntoread.Recommendedforalllibraries.”

(4)
(5)

TheRealHistoryBehindthe

TEMPLARS

(6)

THE BERKLEY PUBLISHING GROUP Published by the Penguin Group Penguin Group (USA) Inc.

375 Hudson Street, New York, New York 10014, USA

PenguinGroup(Canada),90EglintonAvenueEast,Suite700,Toronto,OntarioM4P2Y3,Canada (adivisionofPearsonPenguinCanadaInc.)

PenguinBooksLtd.,80Strand,LondonWC2R0RL,England

PenguinGroupIreland,25St.Stephen’sGreen,Dublin2,Ireland(adivisionofPenguinBooksLtd.) PenguinGroup(Australia),250CamberwellRoad,Camberwell,Victoria3124,Australia (adivisionofPearsonAustraliaGroupPty.Ltd.)

PenguinBooksIndiaPvt.Ltd.,11CommunityCentre,PanchsheelPark,NewDelhi—110017,India PenguinGroup(NZ),67ApolloDrive,Rosedale,NorthShore,0745,Auckland,NewZealand (adivisionofPearsonNewZealandLtd.)

PenguinBooks(SouthAfrica)(Pty.)Ltd.,24SturdeeAvenue,Rosebank,Johannesburg2196, SouthAfrica

PenguinBooksLtd.,RegisteredOffices:80Strand,LondonWC2R0RL,England

THEREALHISTORYBEHINDTHETEMPLARS

Thepublisherdoesnothaveanycontroloveranddoesnotassumeanyresponsibilityforauthoror third-partywebsitesortheircontent.

Copyright©2007bySharanNewman BookdesignbyTiffanyEstreicher

Allrightsreserved.

Nopartofthisbookmaybereproduced,scanned,ordistributedinanyprintedorelectronicform withoutpermission.Pleasedonotparticipateinorencouragepiracyofcopyrightedmaterialsin violationoftheauthor’srights.Purchaseonlyauthorizededitions.

BERKLEY®isaregisteredtradmarkofPenguinGroup(USA)Inc. The“B”designisatrademarkofPenguinGroup(USA)Inc.

ISBN:1-4362-7266-1

(7)

Acknowledgments

ProfessorMalcolmBarber,forhisgenerositynowandovertheyearsinshar­ inghisprofoundknowledgeoftheTemplarsandforenduringmymany e­mailquestionsandventings.

ProfessorPaulCrawford,CaliforniaUniversityofPennsylvania,forhishelp ontheTemplars,PhiliptheFair,andtheUniversityofParis.

Dr.RozanneElder,CistercianInstitute,forgivingmeinstantinformation onBernardofClairvaux.

ProfessorNormanHinton,UniversityofIllinois,Springfield,emeritus,for MiddleEnglishreferencestotheTemplars.

ProfessorJanusMoellerJensen,UniversityofSouthernDenmark,forgiving meliterarybackgroundonTemplaridealsinDanishsagas.

ProfessorKurtVilladsJensen,UniversityofSouthernDenmark,foradvice onthelikelihoodofTemplarsinDenmark.

CourtneydeMayo,RiceUniversity,forspendingatediousdaycopyingallof theMarquisD’Albonforme.

ProfessorBrianPatrickMcGuire,RoskildeUniversity,forcheckingmysec­ tiononDenmarkandtheCistercians.

ProfessorHelenNicholson,CardiffUniversity,foradviceonTemplarsand Hospitallersandforreferringmetootherexcellentsources.

(8)

vi Acknowledgments

KyleWolfley,BallStateUniversity,forcopyingseveralbooksIcouldn’tfind inmyownlibrary.

AndallthemembersoftheMediev­Llist,whodebatedjustwhat“interdict” consistedofwhenIcouldn’tfindasolidanswer.

(9)
(10)

Rulers of the Kingdom of Jerusalem

BALDWIN II m. MORFIA

1118–1131

MELISANDE m. FULK of ANJOU ALICE m. BOHEMOND of ANTIOCH HODIERNA m. RAYMOND of TRIPOLI YVETA

1131–1161 (Abbess)

Constance m. 1. Raymond of Poitiers Raymond III m. Eschiva

BALDWIN III ALMARIC m. 1 Agnes de Courtenay m. 2. Maria Commena

1141–1163

ISABEL I m. 1. Humphrey of Toron

1190–1205 m. 2. Conrad of Monferrat BALDWIN IV SYBILLA m. 1 William of Monferrat m. 2. Guy of Lusignan

1174–1185 1186–1190

BALDWIN V 2 daughters d. 1190 MARIA m. John of Brienne

1185–1186 1205–1212

ISABEL II m. FREDERICK II, Holy Roman Emperor 1225–1228

CONRAD of Sicily and Jerusalem

1243–1254

CONRADIN 1254–1268

ISABEL I. (continued)

m. 3. Henry, count of Champagne 1192–1197 m. 4 Amaury of Lusignan, king of Cyprus

Alice m. 1. Hugh Lusignan of Cyprus Melisande m. Bohemond IV of Antioch

(11)

Contents

Introduction xiii

PA RT ON E

The Poor Knights of Christ

1. TheBeginningoftheOrder 3

2. HughdePayns 11

3. BaldwinII,KingofJerusalem 17

4. Hugh,CountofChampagne 23

5. BernardofClairvaux 28

6. HughdePaynsTakestheTemplarsontheRoad 35

7. TheCouncilofTroyes 38

8. GoForthandMultiply 41

9. TheLifeofaTemplar,AccordingtotheRule 51

10. Melisande,QueenofJerusalem 56

11. FulkofAnjou,theQueen’sHusband 64

12. TheTempleinJerusalem 70

13. ThePopesGetInvolved(YouKnewTheyWould) 74

(12)

x Contents

PA RT T WO

The Glory Years

15. GrandMasters1136–1191 95

16. BetweentheSecondandThirdCrusades(1150–1191) 114

17. WhoWeretheSaracens,Anyway? 122

18.Saladin 128

19. RichardtheLionheart 138

20. TheAssassins 148

21. TheHospitallers 156

22. GrandMasters1191–1292/93 164

23. TheTemplarsandtheSaint,LouisIXofFrance 180

24. TemplarsandMoney 189

25. TheTempleinParis 205

26. TheTempleinLondon 211

27. TheLastStands;TheFallofAcreandLossoftheHolyLand 217

PA RT T H R EE

The End of the Order

of the Poor Knights

28. JacquesdeMolay:TheLastGrandMaster1292–1313 227

29. PhiliptheFair 239

30. FridaytheThirteenth;theArrestandTrialsoftheTemplars 247

31. TheChargesAgainsttheTemplars 265

(13)

xi

Contents

33. TheCouncilofVienneandtheEndoftheOrder 277

34. TimeLineoftheTrials 285

35. TheTrialsOutsideofFrance 289

36. TheSecretRiteofInitiation 304

37. MargueritePorete 313

38. WhoWeretheTemplars? 316

39. TheOtherGuys;RegionalMilitaryOrders 325

40. Baphomet 337

41. TheCathars 341

PA RT FOU R

The Beginning of the Legends

42. TemplarsinFiction 353

43. WhatHappenedtotheTemplars? 358

44. TheHolyGrail 365

45. TemplarsinDenmark:BornholmIsland 373

46. TheTemplarsandtheShroudofTurin 381

47. TemplarsinScotland:RosslynChapel 387

48. TheFreemasonsandtheTemplars 396

Epilogue 408

HowtoTellifYouAreReadingPseudohistory 411

TemplarTimeLine 415

RecommendedReading 421

(14)
(15)

Introduction

L

astyearIwasinFrancetospeakaboutDanBrown’sbookTheDa

VinciCode,explainingtheplaceswherethefictiondivergedfromhis­

tory.AtonestopateenagedboyfromtheNetherlandsaskedme(in excellentEnglish)abouttheTemplars.Iwentintomystandardlec­ tureabouttheirliteraryconnectiontotheGrailandthemythssur­ roundingtheirdissolutionin1312.Helistenedpolitelyforawhileand theninterruptedtoask,“Yes,butwhatweretheTemplars?Didthey reallyexist?”

Icametoafullstop.Thatyoungmanhadacceptedthatthenovel wasfiction.Therefore,hehadassumedthattheTemplarswerealso fiction.

WhenIstartedtothinkaboutit,itmadeperfectsense.WhenI readsciencefiction,Ican’tjudgewhat’sbasedoncutting­edgescience andwhattheauthormadeup.WhyshouldIexpectreadersofhistori­ calfictiontoknowwhichcharactersinabookreallyexisted?

(16)

xiv Introduction

reviled,adoredandloathed.Theywereconsideredbysometobethe closestthatafightingmancouldcometosalvationandbyothers nothingmorethanmaterialisticmoney­grubbers.Theirmassarreston October13,1307,shockedtheWesternworld.Somedefendedthem; othersbelievedtheywereheretics.Manywhothoughttheywereprob­ ablyinnocentofthechargesstillfelttheTemplarshadgottenacome­ uppancethattheyrichlydeserved.

SincetheOrderoftheKnightsTemplarwasdissolved,thesto­ riesaboutthemhavegrownandmutateduntiltheyarehardlyrecog­ nizable.Forthreehundredyearsaftertheendoftheorder,the Templarswerelargelyforgotten.Ifanything,theywereseenasan anachronismthathadendedwellafterithadceasedtobeofanyuse. Theothermilitaryorderssurvivedbychangingandadaptingtothe newworld.

ThenthereweretwogreatspurtsofinterestintheTemplars. Thefirstwasattheendoftheeighteenthcenturywhentheywere rediscoveredbyProtestantEurope.Theybecameasymbolofresis­ tancetopapaltyrannyand,inFrance,thetyrannyofthemonarchy. CatholicsrespondedbyrememberingtheTemplarsasthelastde­ fenseagainsttheenemiesofChrist.

Attheendoftheeighteenthcentury,thecreationofTemplar mythstookahugeleap.ThenewsocietyknownastheFreemasons wasspreadingacrossEurope.Throughtheenthusiasticeffortsofa Germanbaron,KarlvonHund,whopublishedunderapenname,the storyoftheTemplarswasgraftedontoMasonicritualandlore.This openedthedoorforawealthofimaginativetheoriesregardingthe Templars,allofwhichhadmoretodowiththepoliticalsituationin EuropeatthattimethanthehistoryoftheTemplars.

ThesecondgreatdevelopmentintheTemplarmythcameinthe twentiethcentury.LateVictorianwriters,suchasJessieWeston,had woventheTemplarsintoEuropeanfolklore.Butitwasnotuntilthe latterpartofthecenturythatthegeneralpublicbecameintriguedby theorieslinkingtheTemplarstoeverythingfromtheHolyGrail,to CatharHeresy,tomodernsecretsocieties.Currently,thereareso

(17)

Introduction xv

withthem.Theyseemtohavebeeninvolvedwitheverythingexcept theKennedyassassination,andthatmightbenext.

ThisbookisanattempttogivetheknownfactsabouttheKnights Templar,fromtheirbeginningsin1119or1120tothedissolutionin 1312andbeyond.Itismyhopethatthiswillmakeiteasierforpeople whoarereadingthelatestTemplarbook,eitherfictionorhistory,to separatefactfromfictionandgivethemabasefromwhichtoevaluate theideaspresented.Ihavearrangedthebookchronologically,with somechaptersbeinganoverviewofeventsandothersfocusingonin­ dividualpeopleorsubjects.Whentherearewordsinboldtype,that

meansthereisasectiondevotedtothatonetopic.Somesectionsover­ lapinsubjectmatter,givingadifferentviewofpeopleandevents.

Ihaveoftenheardthatreadersareputoffbyfootnotes.Pleasedon’t be.Youdon’thavetoreadthem.Theyaretheretoletyouknowthat I’vedonemybesttofindthemostaccurateinformationavailable.They arealsotheresothatifyouwish,youcangotothesesourcesandcheck themforyourselves.ThenyoucandecideifI’mrightornot.Butif you’rewillingtotrustme,thenjustignorethem.I’llbeveryflattered. Studyinghistorymeansthatonehastobepartscientist,partdetective, andpartpsychologist.Theevidenceisnotalwayscompleteandthat’s why,whenhistorianscometoconclusions,theyalwaysletpeopleknow whatsourcesthoseconclusionsarebasedupon.

(18)
(19)

PA R T ON E

(20)
(21)

C H A P T E R O N E

TheBeginningoftheOrder

H

owdoesalegendbegin?

InthecaseoftheKnightsoftheTempleofSolomonat Jerusalem,itbeganinobscurity.Nocontemporarychroniclermen­ tionstheirexistence.Weonlyknowtheyexistedby1125becausethere isacharterfromthatyearwitnessedbyHughdePaynsinwhichheis

calledthe“MasteroftheTemple.”

LatergenerationswouldtellthestoryofthefirstTemplars,each onealittledifferently:

AtthebeginningofthereignofBaldwinII,aFrenchmancame fromRometoJerusalemtopray.Hehadmadeavownottore­ turntohisowncountry,buttobecomeamonkafterhelpingthe kinginthewarforthreeyears;heandthethirtyknightswhoac­ companiedhimwouldendtheirlivesinJerusalem.Whentheking andhisbaronssawthattheyhadachievedremarkablethingsinthe war...theyadvisedthemantoserveinthearmywithhisthirty knightsanddefendtheplaceagainstbrigandsratherthantobe­ comeamonkinthehopeofsavinghisownsoul.

(22)

4 The Real History Behind the Templars

sametime,anEnglishman,WalterMap,gaveasomewhatdifferent account:

AknightcalledPayns,fromadistrictofBurgundyofthesame name,cameasapilgrimtoJerusalem.Whenheheardthatthe Christianswhowateredtheirhorsesatacisternnotfaroutsidethe gatesofJerusalemwereconstantlyattackedbythepagans,and thatmanyofthebelieverswereslainintheseambuscades,hepit­ iedthem,and...hetriedtoprotectthemasfarashecould.He frequentlysprangtotheiraidfromwell­chosenhidingplacesand slewmanyoftheenemy.

WalterviewsthefounderoftheorderasasortofLoneRanger whoeventuallyenlistedotherknightstojoinhiminhiswork.This wouldmakeagoodmovieplot,butitisunlikelythatamandoingthis wouldlivelongenoughtoestablishanorderofknights.

YetanotherstoryofthefirstTemplarsisfromalaterwriter,Ber­ nard,amonkatCorbie.Hewrotein1232,overahundredyearsafter theorderbegan,buthewasdrawingonanowlostversionbyanoble­ mannamedErnoullivinginJerusalemaboutthesametimeasthe otherwriters.Bernardwrote:

WhentheChristianshadconqueredJerusalem,theyinstalled themselvesattheTempleoftheSepulcherandmanymorecame therefromeverywhere.Andtheyobeyedthepriorofthesepul­ cher.Thegoodknightstheretookcounselamongthemselvesand said,“Wehaveabandonedourlandsandourfriendsandhave comeheretoelevateandglorifytheruleofGod.Ifwestayhere, drinking,eatingandhangingaround,withoutdoingwork,then wecarryourweaponsfornothing.Thislandhasneedof them....Letusgettogetherandmakeoneofusthemasterofus all...toleadusinbattlewhenitoccurs.”

(23)

5

The Beginning of the Order

ofapriest,anditwasonlythroughboredomthattheydecidedtoform afightingunit.

FinallywehavetheaccountofWilliam,ArchbishopofTyre.He istheonemostoftenquotedanditishisversionthathasmostoften beenaccepted.SincehewasborninJerusalemandeducatedinEu­ rope,hehadbothaccesstotherecordsandthepolishedstyleneces­ sarytopresentthehistory.

Inthatsameyear[1119]somenoblemenofknightlyrank,devoted toGod,piousandGodfearing,placedthemselvesinthehandsof thelordpatriarchfortheserviceofChrist,professingthewishto liveperpetuallyinthemannerofregularcanonsinchastity,and obedience,withoutpersonalbelongings.Theleadingandmost eminentofthesemenwerethevenerableHughofPaynsand GodfreyofSt.Omer.Astheyhadneitherchurchnorfixedabode, thekinggavethematemporaryhomeinhispalacewhichwason thesouthsideoftheTempleoftheLord,...Theirmainduty, imposedonthembythepatriarchandtheotherbishopsforthe remissionoftheirsins,wasthattheyshouldmaintainthesafetyof theroadsandthehighwaystothebestoftheirability,fortheben­ efitofpilgrimsinparticular,againstattacksofbanditsandma­ rauders.

Theseexplanationshaveafewthingsincommon.Theyallimply thatHughdePaynswasthefirstoftheTemplarsandthatKing BaldwinIIofJerusalemwastheonetorecognizethem,eitheras

knightscommittedtotheprotectionofpilgrimsorasagroupofreli­ giousmenwhowishedtodevotetheirmilitaryskilltothedefenseof theChristiansettlements.TheyalsoagreethatatfirsttheTemplars livedatthesitethecrusadersbelievedtobethetempleoftheHoly Sepulcher,theplacewhereJesushadbeenburied.Itwasonlyafter theybecameamilitaryorderthatthemenmovedtotheking’spalace, inwhatwasbelievedtobetheTempleofSolomon.Theymayhave sharedquartersatthebeginningwiththeHospitallers,whohadbeen

(24)

6 The Real History Behind the Templars

Thechroniclesareunclearonwhoseideaitwastohaveanorderof menwholivedlikemonksandfoughtlikesoldiers.Afterall,fighting monks?Thatdidn’tmakesense.Menwhofoughthadtoshedblood; sheddingbloodwasasin.Monksprayedforthesoulsofwarriorswhile deploringtheirviolence.Theideawasthatfightingmenwereaneces­ saryeviltoprotectsocietyfromthelawless.Someofthemwouldfind religion,giveuptheiraggressiveways,andjoinamonastery,butwho everheardofareligiousorderwhosemissionwastogointobattle?

Itwasanideabornofdesperation.Withthesuccessofthefirst waveofcrusaders,JerusalemandthesitesoftheBiblewereonceagain opentoChristianpilgrims.Andthepilgrimscameindrovesfromall thecornersofChristendom.

But,whilethecitiesofJerusalem,Tripoli,Antioch,andAcrehad beentaken,theroadsthatconnectedthemwerestill,forthemost part,inthehandsoftheMoslems.Andtherewereanumberoftowns thathadnotbeenconquered.Thepilgrimswerefairgameforraiding parties.AtEasterin1119apartyofsomesevenhundredwasattacked whilegoingfromJerusalemtotheJordanRiver.Threehundredof themwerekilledandanothersixtycapturedandsoldintoslavery.

WalterMap’sstoryofHughdePaynssingle­handedlyguardinga wateringholemayhavecomenotfromtheTemplarsbutfromthe experiencesofaRussian,theabbotDaniel.Inabout1107,hetoldofa placebetweenJaffaandJerusalemwherethepilgrimscouldgetwater. Theywouldstaythereforthenight“ingreatfear”foritwasnearthe MoslemtownofAscalonfrom“whencetheSaracenswouldissueand massacrethepilgrims.”

(25)

7

The Beginning of the Order

TheTemplarswereatfirstalocalgroupwithnoconnectiontothe papacy.TheyreceivedtheapprovalofthepatriarchofJerusalem,Gar­ mund,*andmayhavebeenpresentedatachurchcouncilheldatthe townofNablusonJanuary23,1120.

ThecouncilwasnotconvenedtoestablishtheKnightsofthe Templebuttodiscussproblemsthathaddevelopedinthetwenty yearssincethefoundingoftheLatinkingdoms.Themainworrywas thatgrasshoppershadbeendestroyingthecropsforthefouryears past.Thegeneralfeelingwasthatthiswasadivinepunishmentbe­ causemoralshadslackenedsincetheconquestofJerusalem.Somost ofthetwenty­fivepronouncementsthatthecouncilpassedaddressed thesinsoftheflesh.

Itisinterestingthateventhoughthiswasareligiouscouncil, therewereasmanylaylordsasbishopsparticipating.Thisshowsthat theconcernswerewidespreadandneededtobesolvedbyallthosein power.

ThiscouncilinterestsmebecauseseveralhistoriansoftheTem­ plarsmentionitasifitwereimportanttotheformationoftheTem­ plars,but,whenIwenttotheofficial records,nothingwassaid aboutthem.Instead,thecanons(laws)thatwereenactedatNablus dwellonwhichsinsthelordsandclericsofJerusalemthoughtwere theworst.Sevenofthemforbidadulteryorbigamyandfourcon­ cernsodomy.Fivemoredealwithsexualandotherrelationsbe­ tweenChristiansandSaracens,whichwerenotallowedunlessthe Saracenhadbeenbaptized.Thegeneralimplicationseemstohave beenthatifpeoplestoppeddoingthesethings,thenextharvest wouldbebetter.

Thereisnoofficialreportastowhetherthedecreesofthecouncil werefollowedorifthenextyear’scropswereunmolested.Fromother sources,itappearsthatsinsofthefleshwerecommittedasusual.

TheonlycanonthatmightrelatetotheTemplars,agroupstillin itsinfancy,isnumbertwenty:“Ifaclerictakesuparmsinthecauseof

(26)

8 The Real History Behind the Templars

defense, he is not held to be guilty.” It does not mention knights becomingmilitaryclerics.

Allthesame,thiswasaradicaldeparture.Despitetheloosening ofthecommandagainstgeneralwarfareinthecaseofthosewho foughtforGod,priestsandmonkshadalwaysbeenabsolutelyforbid­ dentofight.

However,atAntioch,theyearbeforethecouncil,CountRoger andmostofhisarmyhadbeenkilledoutsidethewallsofthecityina battlestillknownasthe“FieldofBlood.”InordertosaveAntioch, theFrankishpatriarch,Bernard,issuedarmstoanyonewhocould carrythem,includingmonksandpriests.Luckily,theclericsdidn’t havetofight,buttheprecedenthadbeenset.

ThiswastheatmosphereinwhichtheOrderoftheTemplewas formed.

OneofthemythsthattheTemplarstoldabouttheirownbeginning wasthatforthefirstnineyearstherewereonlynineknights.Thisis firstmentionedinWilliamofTyrebutwasoftenrepeatedbylater chroniclerswholearneditfromtheTemplarsoftheirowntime.

Werethereonlyninemembers?Probablynot.WhiletheOrderof theTempledidn’tseemtohavegrownverymuchinthefirstfewyears, itwouldn’thavelastedatallwithsofewmen.Thenumberninemight havebeenchosenbecauseitwentwiththenineyearsfromthefound­ inguntiltheCouncilofTroyes,wheretheorderwasgivenformal

recognition.

SomescholarsthinktheTemplarsmayhavebeeninfluencedby medievalnumbersymbolism.Nineisa“circularnumber”:nomatter howmuchitismultiplied,thedigitsalwaysadduptonineoramul­ tipleofit,“andthereforecouldbeseenasincorruptible.”Manyyears afterthefounding,thepoetDantesurmisedthatthenumberninewas chosenbecause“nineistheholycipheroftheorderofangels,three timestheholycipherthreeoftheTrinity.”

(27)

9

The Beginning of the Order

anditisinhischroniclethatwefirstfindthisidea.It’sverypossible thatthenumberwasWilliam’sinventionandthatitwastakenupby theTemplarsofhistimeandaddedtotheirownversionoftheirleg­ end.There’snowaytotell,butthenumberninedidbecomepartof TemplarloreandwasusedintheartworkinsomeTemplarchapels. Fromthereitcametobeconsideredafactsimplybecausethelegend hadbeenrepeatedsooften.

SoweknowverylittleaboutthefirstyearsoftheKnightsTemplar. ThereareafewchartersfromJerusalemandAntiochthatarewit­ nessedbytheearlymembers.ButthesearenotgiftstotheTemplars, merelyevidencethatthesemenexistedandwereintheHolyLand. Therearenosurvivingrecordsofdonationstotheorderbefore1124.

Itishumannaturetowanttofillinthegaps,theblankspaceson themaps,thepartsofthestorythatdon’tseemenough.Thisiswhat happenedtothestoryofthefirstTemplars.Atthetime,theyweren’t consideredimportantenoughforthechroniclerstomention.But sixty­oddyearslater,whentheywereanimportantpartofsociety, peoplewantedtoknowhowitallbegan.

Andsothelegendswerebornandstartedtogrow.Theyaregrow­ ingstill.

ChartersoftheHolySepulcherno.105,inThierryLeroy,HugesdePayns(Troyes,2001) p.194.

MichaeltheSyrian,inMalcomBarberandKeithBate,TheTemplars:SelectedSourcesTranslated andAnnotated(ManchesterUniversityPress,2002)p.27.TakenfromtheChroniquedeMichelle Syrien,PatriarcheJacobited’Antioch(1166–90),ed.andtr.J.B.Chabot(Paris:ErnestLerous,1905) p.201.

WalterMap,Denugiscurialium/Courtiers’Trifles,tr.FrederickTupperandMarburyBladen Ogle(London,1924)p.33.

(28)

10 The Real History Behind the Templars

WilliamofTyreinBarberandBate,pp.25–26.TextinGuillaumedeTyr,Chronique,ed.R.B.C. Huygens,2vols.CorpusChristianorumContinuatioMediavales63and63A(Turnholt,1986) 12.7pp.553–54“Eodemannoquidamnobilesvirideequstriordine,deodevoteireligiosietti­ mentesdeum,inmonudominipatriarcheChristiserviciosemancipantes,morecanonicorum regulariumincastitateetobedientiaetsinepropriovellepertpetuovivereprofessisunt.Inter quosprimietprecipuifuerenutvirivernerabilesHugodePagainisetGaufridusdeSanctoAl­ demaro.Quibusquoniamnequeecclesiaeratnequecertumhabebantdomiciliumrexinpalatio suo,quodsecusTemplumDominiasaustralemhabetpartem,eisadtempusconcessit habitaculum,...Primaautemeorumprofessio,quodqueeisadominopatriarchaetreliquis episcopisinremissionempeccatoruminiunctumest,utviasetitineramaximeadsalutemper­ egrinorumcontralatronumetincursantiuminsidiasproviribusconservarent.”

MalcolmBarber,TheNewKnighthood(CambridgeUniversityPress,1994)p.9.

QuotedinEdwardBurman,TheTemplars,KnightsofGod(Rochester,VT:DestinyBooks,1986) p.16.

Charles­JosephHefeleandH.Leclerq,HistoiresdeConcilesd’apreslesdocumentsOriginaux, t.Va(Paris:LetouzeyetAné,1912)p.592.

BenjaminZ.Kader,“OntheOriginsoftheEarliestLawsofFrankishJerusalem:TheCanons

oftheCopuncilofNablus,1120,”SpeculumApril1999(LatinCanonsreproducedfromBibi­ lotecaApostolicaVaticana,MSVat.Lat.1345Fols.1r–3r)pp.331–34.

 Ibid.p.334.“Siclericuscausadefenssionis[sic]armadetulerit,culpanonteneantur.”(mytrans­ lation)

 Ibid.p.332andinarticle.SeealsoStevenRunciman,AHistoryoftheCrusadesVol.II(Cam­ bridgeUniversityPress,1952)pp.150–52.

 WilliamofTyre,p.554.“Cumqueiamannisnovenineofuissentproposito,nonnisinovem

errant.”

 BarberandBate,p.3.

 QuotedinMarieLuiseBuist­Thiele,“TheInfluenceofSt.BernardofClairvauxontheForma­

tionoftheOrderoftheKnightsTemplar,”ed.MichaelGerversTheSecondCrusadeandthe Cistercians(NewYork:St.Martin’sPress,1992)p.58.

Ibid.

(29)

C H A P T E R T W O

HughdePayns

A

midallthedifferenttheoriesaboutthebeginningoftheTem­

plarsthereisoneconstant.Thefounderoftheorderwasacer­ tainHughdePayns,knight.

Somesayheandafewcomradesfirstapproachedthepatriarchof Jerusalem,askingtoliveamonasticlifeinthecity.Othersreportthe menwenttoBaldwinII,kingofJerusalem.Stillotherssuggestthatit

wasBaldwinwhoaskedHughandhisfriendstoactasprotectorsto themanypilgrimscomingfromtheWesttoJerusalem.

Inallofthese,themainconstantisHugh.

ButwhowasHugh?WhereisPayns?Whatwashisbackground andwhowerehisfamily?Whatcouldhaveledhimtodevotehislife tofightingforGod?

(30)

12 The Real History Behind the Templars

Hugh de Payns and Godfrey of St. Omer before King Baldwin II. ( Bibliotheque Nationale)

doesnotseemtohavebeenanysensethathewasinlineforsaint­ hood.

Sohowdowefindoutmoreaboutthismanwhostarteditall? ThefirstcluewehaveisfromthechroniclerWilliamofTyre.He says that Hugh came from the town of Payns, near Troyes in the countyofChampagne.WilliamalsomentionsHugh’scompanion, GodfreyofSt.Omer,inPicardy,nowFlanders.Thesetwomenseem, inWilliam’seyes,tobecofoundersoftheTemplars,butitwasHugh whobecamethefirstGrandMaster.Thismayhavebeenthrough naturalleadership,butitalsomayhavebeenbecauseHughhadthe rightconnections.

PaynsisasmalltowninFrance,nearTroyes,theseatofthe counts of Champagne. It is situated in a fertile farmland that even thenhadareputationforitswine.It’snotknownwhenHughwas born,orwhohisparentswere.Thefirstmentionofhimintherecords isfromabout1085–1090,whena“HugodePedano,Montiniacidomi­ nus,”orHughofPayns,lordofMontigny,witnessedacharterin

(31)

13

Hugh de Payns

Molesme.Inordertobeawitness,ourHughhadtohavebeenatleast sixteen.Sohewasprobablybornaround1070.

Overthenextfewyears,fourmorechartersofthecountarewit­ nessedbya“HugodePeanz”or“HugodePedans.”Actually,theplace nameisspelledslightlydifferently each time it appears. It is also spelled“Hughes.”Spellingwasmuchmoreofacreativeartbackthen. However,it’sfairlycertainthattheseareallthesameman.These showthatHughwaspartofthecourtofthecountofChampagne, perhapsevenrelatedtohim.

ThelastofthesechartersinChampagneisfrom1113.Thenext timewefindthenameHughdePayns,itisin1120inJerusalem.This ishighlysuggestive,asHughiswitnesstoacharterconfirmingthe propertyoftheOrderofSt.John(theHospitallers).Sonowwehave

confirmationofthestorythatHughwasinJerusalemin1119–1120to foundtheTemplarsoutsideoflaterhistories.However,itisnotuntil fiveyearslaterthatHughwitnessesacharterinwhichhelistshimself as“MasteroftheKnightsTemplar.”Inbetween,heiswitnesstoa donationmadein1123byGaramond,patriarchofJerusalem,tothe abbeyofSantaMariadeJosaphat.HereHughislistedonlybythe name“HugonisdePeans.”ThereisnomentionoftheTemplarsand Hughisneartheendofthelistofwitnesses,showingthathewasnot oneofthemostimportantpeoplepresent.

HowdidHughgettoJerusalem?Whathappenedinthosefive yearsbetweenwitnessingacharterasalaymanandbecomingMaster oftheTemplars?Wecanguess,butunlessmoreinformationappears, wecan’tknowforcertain.

ThemostlikelyreasonforHughtohavegonetotheHolyLand wasinthecompanyofCountHugh.Thecountmadeapilgrimageto Jerusalem,hissecond,in1114.Thereisnolistofhiscompanions,but itwouldfitthatHughdePaynswouldhavebeeninhiscompany. Hughwasalreadyamongthoseatcourtoftenenoughtobeawitness tothecount’sdonationsandthereforeoneofhisliegemen.Buthe musthavebeenreleasedfromhisobligationtohislordfor,when CountHughreturnedhome,HughdePaynsremainedinJerusalem.

(32)

14 The Real History Behind the Templars

Again,Hughhasn’tleftanythingtotellus.Wasitaspenancefor hissins?Mostpilgrimageswereintendedasaquestfordivineforgive­ ness.ManypeoplehaveinsistedthatknightsonlywenttotheHoly Landforwealth,eitherinlandorgoodslootedfromthosetheycon­ quered.ButinHugh’scase,oncehedecidedtoremaininJerusalemhe resolvedtolivethelifeofamonk,owningnothing.

ItisevenmoresurprisingbecauseHughapparentlyleftawife andatleastoneyoungchildbehind.HiswifewasnamedElizabeth. ShewasprobablyfromthefamilyofthelordsofChappes,landquite closetoPayns.Theirson,Thibaud,becameabbotofthemonastery ofLaColombe.Hughmayhavehadtwootherchildren,Guibuin andIsabelle,butIdon’tfindtheevidenceforthemcompletelycon­ vincing.

Inprinciple,anymarriedpersonwishingtojoinareligiousorder hadtohavethepermissionofhisorherspouseandthatspousewas alsotojoinaconventormonastery.Inpractice,however,thisdidn’t happenthatoften,especiallyamongthenobility.WhenSybillaof Anjou,countessofFlanders,remainedinJerusalemtojointhenunsat theconventofBethanyin1151,herhusband,Thierry,returnedto Flandersandcontinuedhislife.Sometimes,thespouseremarried.It isnotknownwhathappenedtoElizabeth.Perhapsshediedbefore HughleftChampagne.

Hughdidnotabandontheplaceofhisbirth.Whenhereturned toEuropetodrumupsupportfortheKnightsoftheTemple,here­ ceivedhisgreatestsupportinChampagne.ItwasattheCouncilof Troyes,onlyafewmilessouthofPayns,thattheorderreceivedoffi­ cialpapalapproval.

(33)

15

Hugh de Payns

onCrusadeandsotheTemplarsgavehimfortylivreswiththepromise oftwentymorewhen(orif)Odoreturned.

However,afterfoundingthecommandery,itappearsthatHugh donatednothingmoretoit.HereturnedtoJerusalem,probablyaround 1130,anddiedin1136.May24isthetraditionaldate.

Therecordswehavefromtheearlytwelfthcenturygivenomore informationonHughdePayns.Ofcourse,muchhasbeenlostoverthe years.SomeoftheTemplarrecordsinEuropeweredestroyedafterthe dissolutionoftheorderattheCouncilofVienne.Thisdoesn’tseemto havebeenbecausetheinformationwassecretorheretical,simplythatit wasnolongerneededandtheparchmentcouldbescrapedandreused.

ThemainTemplararchives,whichmighthavehadmoreinforma­ tiononHugh,werenotinEurope,however,butinJerusalem.They weremovedtoAcreandthenCyprus,wheretheywerein1312.War andconquestensuredthatanythingleftwasscatteredordestroyed.

PerhapstherewasonceabiographyofsortsofHughdePayns.It seemstomethatsomeonewouldhavewantedtotelltheworldmore abouthim.Whatwecandeducefromhisactionsisthathemusthave beenastrong­willedman,verydevoutandwiththeabilitytoconvince otherstoseeandfollowhisvision.Hedoesnotseemtohavebeen particularlywelleducated.Nothinginhislifeorbackgroundwould indicatethathewasinvolvedinanythingofamysticalnature,nor thathefoundedtheTemplarstoprotectsomenewlydiscoveredtrea­ sureorsecret,asmodernmythsstate.

HughdePaynswasmostlikelyadeeplydevoutlaymanwho wantedtoserveGodbyprotectingHispilgrimsandHisland.Hugh usedhiswealth,suchasitwas,andhisfamilyandsocialconnections tomakethispossible.Nothingmore.

WilliamofTyre,ed.R.B.V.Huygens,CCCM6312.7.6(Brepols,Turnholt1986)“Interquos

primusetprecipuifueruntvirivenerabilesHugodePaganisetGaufridusdeSanctoAldemaro.”

ThierryLeroy,HughesdePayns,ChevalierChampenois,FondateurdeL’OrdredesTempliers

(Troyes:LaMaisonduBoulanger,2001)p.194.CartulairedeMolesme,n.230p.214.

Leroy,p.194.CharterslistedareforabbeysallintheareaofTroyes.

Henri­FrançoisDelaborde,ChartresdeTerre­SainteProvenantdel’AbbayedeN.­D.deJosaphat.

(34)

16 The Real History Behind the Templars

Leroy,p.194.CartulairedeSaintSépulcreno.105,“magistermilitiumTempli.”

ChartresdeTerre­SainteProvenantdel’AbbayedeN.­D.deJosaphat,ed.H­FrancoisDelaborde, (Paris,1880)p.38.Charterno.12.

MichaelBur,LaformationducomtédeChampagne(UniversitédeLilleIII,1977)p.275.

Leroy,p.98.Despiteseveralpopularmodernbooksoffictionandsomethatsaytheyarenon­

fiction,thereisnotruthtothetalethatHugh’swifewasnamedCatherineSt.Clair.

Thibaudwaselectedabbotin1139.“ThibauddePahens,filiusHugonisprimimagistritemple

Jerosolymitani.”QuotedinLeroy,p.95.

 Leroy,pp.95–114.NeitherofthechildrenislistedassonordaughterofHugh.Theymightbe

fromanotherbranchofthefamilywhotookoverPaynsafterThibaudenteredthemonastery.

 KarenNicholas,“CountessesasRulersinFlanders,”inAristocraticWomeninMedievalFrance, ed.TheodoreEvergates(Philadelphia:UniversityofPennsylvaniaPress,1999)p.123.

(35)

C H A P T E R T H R E E

BaldwinII,

KingofJerusalem

B

aldwinofLeBourqaccomplishedthedreamofmanyofthe

knightsoftheFirstCrusade.Hewentfrombeingashirttailrela­ tiveofGodfreyofBouillonandhisbrother,BaldwinI,theheroesof thecrusade,tobecomingkinginhisownright,marryingaprincess andrulingarealmthathadbeenconqueredforthegloryofGod.

HealsowasthemanwhofirstgavetheTempleofSolomonto

HughdePaynsandhisknights,thusstartingboththerealityandthe

legendoftheTemplars.

BaldwinwasthesonofHugh,countofRethel,andacousinof theLotharingianbrothersEustace,Godfrey,andBaldwin.Hewent withthemontheFirstCrusadeandremained.WhenEustacere­ turnedhometobecomecountofBoulogne,Godfrey,“theProtectorof theHolySepulcher,”diedandBaldwinbecamethefirstkingofJeru­ salem;theircousinwasgiventhecountyofEdessatorule.

(36)

18 The Real History Behind the Templars

toberuledbytheWesterncrusadersaslongastheycouldpractice theirformofChristianity.

Unlikemanyoftheearlysettlers,Baldwinseemstohaveadapted tothecustomsofhisnewland.HeacceptedtheArmenianpatriarch with“allthehonorsduetohishighecclesiasticaldignity,gavehimvil­ lages,loadedhimdownwithgiftsandshowedhimgreatfriendship.” ThedifferentChristiansectsofthecountywereallowedtocontinue theirformsofworship,notforcedtoconformtotheRomanrites.

Inhisdesiretoassimilatewithhisnewsubjects,Baldwinalso tookanArmenianbride.HernamewasMorfiaandshewasthe daughterofKhoril,princeofMelitene.Althoughitwasapolitically soundmoveandshecamewithanexcellentdowry,therealsoseemsto havebeengenuineaffectionbetweenBaldwinandMorfia.Therestof themarriagesamongthenoblefamiliesoftheLatinkingdomsmake thesteamiestsoapoperaslooktame,butintheiryearstogetherBald­ winandMorfiaprovokednoscandalandnotalkofdivorce.When onlydaughterswereborntothem,Baldwinsawnoreasonwhythe eldestoneshouldn’tinheritEdessa.

Whenin1118,BaldwinI,kingofJerusalem,diedwithoutanheir, heleftnoprovisionforthesuccessiontothethrone.Thepatriarchof Jerusalem,Arnulf,calledthelordstogethertodecidewhattodo. Somefeltthattheking’slastremainingbrother,Eustace,shouldbe summonedfromBoulognetotakeupthekingship.Othersfeltthatit wasunsafetowaitforEustace.Thetimeitwouldtaketosendames­ sengertoEuropeandbackwouldleavethekingdomopentoanarchy andattack.

JocelynofCourtenay,anotherearlycrusader,putinavotefor BaldwinofLeBourq.Baldwinwasofthesamefamilyasthelate king,hehaddoneagoodjobrulingEdessa,and,evenifhischildren wereallgirls,hehadprovedhecouldproducechildren.Therewasstill hopeforaboy.

(37)

19

Baldwin II, King of Jerusalem

ItturnedoutthatEustacewasn’tthrilledwiththeideaoftaking overthegovernanceofJerusalem.HehadstartedoutfortheHoly Landwhenheheardofhisbrother’sdeath,buthadonlyreachedItaly whenhelearnedofBaldwin’scoronation.Hewasapparentlyquite contenttogobacktohishomeinBoulogne.

EustacemayhaverealizedthattheKingdomofJerusalemwasa prizethatwouldneedconstantdefending.Orhemayhaveremem­ beredwhatthesummersunintheNearEastdoestofairnorthern skin.SoBaldwinbecamethesecondkingofJerusalemwithoutaseri­ ousstruggle.HegaveEdessatohissupporterJocelynofCourtenay.

Thenewkingfacedamountainofproblems,bothmilitaryand economic.ThecapitalcityofJerusalemhadbeenclearedofallnon­ Christiansbythefirstcrusadersandtherehadn’tbeenmuchinterest amongtheFrankstorepopulateit.Thecitywasaplaceforpilgrimsto visit,seethesights,buysomesouvenirs,andgohome.Baldwingave concessionstoanyone“Latin”whowouldsetupshopsandhomes.He alsogaveSyrians,Greeks,andArmenians—everyoneexceptSara­ censandJews—therightoffreetrade,especiallyinfoodstuffs.It workedtosomeextent,butJerusalemwasimportantmoreforitshis­ toricalandreligiousconnectionsratherthanasamajorcenteroftrade. Itwastheportcitiesthatmaintainedthecrusaders’holdontheland andmostoftheWesternerslivedalongthecoast.

Outsideofthecities,therewaslittlecontroloverthearea.The pilgrims,whobroughtcashin,werebeingwaylaidontheroadbyrob­ bers.ItwasimpossibletopatrolthewholeareabetweenJerusalemand theportcities.Also,manyofthepilgrimscouldn’tseemtounder­ standthattheycouldn’tjusttrotofftospendadayinBethlehemorgo foradipintheJordanwithoutguards.Baldwinhadneitherthemen northeresourcestoprotectthem.Andyet,withoutthepilgrims,Je­ rusalemcouldnotsurvive.

It’snotcertainwhetheritwasBaldwinorHughdePaynswho

(38)

20 The Real History Behind the Templars

beenestablishedwithinJerusalemtoprovideshelterandcaretothe pilgrims,manyofwhomcamewiththeintentionofdyingintheHoly Land.Butin1119,whentheTemplarswerefounded,thehospitalhad nomilitaryduties.Sotherewasadefinitenichefortheknightsto fill.

KingBaldwingavethemtheuseofasectionoftheroyalpalace, thoughttobeonthesiteoftheTempleofSolomon,andleftthemto

settleinasbesttheycould.

ThenextfewyearsforBaldwinwerespentoutsideofJerusalem. HehadtomopupafterRogerofAntiochdecidedtorideoutandfight theOrtoqidTurkIlghaziwithoutwaitingforreinforcements.The placewhereRogerrealizedthathe’dmadehislastmistakewasever afterknownasthe“FieldofBlood.”

BaldwintookoverthegovernanceofAntiochuntilRoger’sheir, Bohemond,couldreachadulthoodandarrivefromhishomeinApu­ lia.HealsokeptaneyeonEdessaandwhen,in1123,CountJocelyn wascapturedbyIlghazi’snephewBalak,Baldwinrushednorthto maintainorderinthecity.Unfortunately,Baldwinfellintothesame trapasJocelynhadandbecameBalak’sprisonerinApril1123.

ThebaronsofJerusalemchosearegent,EustacedeGarnier,lord ofSidonandCaesarea.HeheldthingstogetherquitewelluntilBald­ winwasreleasedin1124,afterpayingaheavyransomandgiving Balakhisfive­year­olddaughter,Yveta,asahostage.

DuringhiscaptivitythecityofTyrewascapturedfromtheTurks bytheFranksandtheVenetians.TheunimportanceoftheTemplars atthistimeisclearfromthefactthatthetreatywassignedbythe patriarchofJerusalem,thearchbishopofCaesarea,threeotherbish­ ops,theabbotofSantaMariaofJosaphat,andthepriorsoftheHoly Sepulcher,theTempleoftheLord,andMoutSion.Themasterofthe Templeisn’tevenamongthewitnesses.

(39)

21

Baldwin II, King of Jerusalem

Inbetweenbattles,Baldwinwasbusymarryingoffhisdaughter, Alice,tothecountofAntioch,BohemondII,nowoldenoughtotake charge.Histhirddaughter,Hodierna,wasthenmarriedtothecount ofTripoli.Forhiseldestdaughter,Melisande,Baldwinsentadelega­

tionbacktoEuropetoaskforthehandofthewidowedcountofAn­

jou,Fulk.Althoughthereisn’tmuchmentionoftheTemplarsin

Jerusalemuptothispoint,HughdePaynsandGodfreyofSt.Omer, thetwofirstknightsoftheorder,wereintheparty.

ThismissionbacktoEuropewastheturningpointfortheTem­ plars.HughandGodfreyreturnedwithmen,money,andpapalap­ proval.Thislastallowedthemtocollectdonationsandsetupbranch housestomanageproperty.Thehouses,calledpreceptoriesorcom­ manderies,providedhorses,fodderandfoodaswellascashforthe constantneedsofthefrontlineTemplarknights.

ThetripwasalsogoodpublicrelationsforBaldwinandtheKing­ domofJerusalem.HughandGodfreyremindedpeopleofthepurpose ofthecrusades.TheTemplarknightswerenotlookingforindividual wealthorlandorpoliticalpower.Theorderitselfwounduphavingall threebutnoonecouldhaveforeseenthatin1125,whenthemenset out.WhatpeopleinEuropesawweremenofgoodbirthwhohad abandonedtheirlandsandfamiliesinordertodefendtheplaceswhere Christhadlivedanddiedforallpeople.TheexampleoftheTemplars wasashamingremindertothosewhohadstayedbehind.

WhenBaldwinIIdiedinAugust1131,theKingdomofJerusalem wasfirmlyestablished.Hisdaughterandson­in­lawhadgivenhima grandson,thefutureBaldwinIII,whowouldcarryonhisline.Con­ structiononthenewChurchoftheHolySepulcherhadbegun.He musthavefeltthathehadgivenhispeopleagoodbasetocontinue expandingtheterritory.

(40)

22 The Real History Behind the Templars

RenéGrousset,HistoiredesCroisadesetduRoyanmeFrancdeJérusalem(Paris,1934)p.388.

Monophysites:ThisisaChristiansectthatstressesthedivinenatureofJesusoverthehuman

one.TheArmenianMonophysitesbeganinthefifthcenturyandstillexist.

HansEberhardMayer,TheCrusades(OxfordUniversityPress,1988)p.49.

Grousset,p.259(quotingMatthewofEdessa).

Hehadbeenmarriedtwice,oncetoanArmenianprincesswhomhehadrefusedtoacceptbe­

causeshehadbeencapturedforashorttimebyMoslemsandhesaidshehadbeenrapedby them.ThesecondtimewastoAdelaideofSicily,whomherepudiated.Mayersaysthat“toall appearances,thekingwashomosexual”(p.71)buthedoesn’tsaywhatthoseappearanceswere. Baldwinwasburiednexttohisbrother,Godfrey.

WilliamofTyre,Chroniqueed.R.B.C.Huygens,CCCM63(Turnholt,1986)12,3p.549.

Ibid.,p.549(Iaddedthepartabouthisdaughters).Williamlistedtheotherreasons. Ibid.,p.550.

Grousset,p.537.

 WilliamofTyre,p.565.“DeditetiamSurianis,Grecis,Armenisetharumcuiuslibetnationum

hominibus,Sarracenisetiamnichilominus,liberampotestaemsineexactionealiquainferendi insanctamcivitatemtriticum,ordeumetquodlibetgenusqequminus.”

 Pleaseseechapter1,TheBeginningoftheOrder.

 Mayer,p.73.

 WilliamofTyre,12,28,p.581.  Mayer,pp.79–80.

(41)

C H A P T E R F O U R

Hugh,

CountofChampagne

O

neoftheearliestmembersoftheTemplarswasalsooneofthe

fewmembersofthehighnobilitytojoin.HughofChampagne remainsoneofthemoremysteriousofthefirstTemplars.

Aswithsomuchofthepoliticsintheeleventhandtwelfthcentu­ ries,thestoryofHugh,firstcountofChampagne,isthatoffamily. Whenhewasborn,thecountyofChampagnedidn’texist.Formost ofhislifehecalledhimselfthecountofTroyes,whichwasthemain holdingofhisancestors.

HughwastheyoungestsonofThibaudI,whowascountofBlois, Meaux,andTroyes,andofAdeleofBar­sur­Aube.Thibaudhadgained someofhispropertybytakingoverlandsbelongingtoanephew. Therefore,hehadsomethingtogivetoHugh,hislast­bornson.Hugh’s olderbrother,Stephen­Henry,gotthebestproperty,thatofBloisand Meaux.HughinheritedTroyesandotherbitsfromhismotherandthe propertyofhismiddlebrother,Odo,whodiedyoung.

(42)

24 The Real History Behind the Templars

HughdePayns,becameoneofHugh’ssupportersandamemberof hiscourt.

Hughscoredacoupin1094byhismarriagetoConstance,daugh­ terofPhilipI,kingofFrance.ShebroughtwithherthedowryofAt­ tigny,justnorthofHugh’slands.

Asthetwelfthcenturydawned,Hughseemedtobeanup­and­ comingyoungnobleman,withanexpandingamountoflandandroyal connections.

In1102,Stephen­HenrydiedinbattleinPalestine.Heleftseveral youngsonsandaformidablewife,Adele,thedaughterofKingHenry IofEngland.ThiswasStephen’ssecondtriptotheHolyLand.Itwas saidthatAdelewasn’tpleasedwithherhusband’smilitaryexploitson thefirsttrip.HehaddesertedthecrusaderarmybeforereachingAn­ tioch.Adeleinsistedhereturnandfightmorebravelybeforeshowing hisfaceathomeagain.Stephen­Henry’sdeathinbattleapparently satisfiedher.

Ataboutthesametime,1103,Hughhadaverystrangeencounter. OnedaywhilehewastravelinginthevalleyofSuippe,amannamed Alexander,apilgrimfromtheHolyLand,cametoseehim.Acharter fromtheconventofAvenaytellswhathappenednext.“Hugh...used toransomcaptivesandaidthedestitute.Amongthesewasacertain Alexander,animpoverishedmanfromoverseaswhomthecounttook intohisownhousehold.Themostnoblecountandhisfamilytreated thismansowellthatheevenateandoftensleptinthecount’sper­ sonalquarters.”

Hugh’sconfidenceinAlexanderwasmisplacedfor,onenight, “judgingthetimeandplaceappropriate,[he]triedtoslitthethroatof thesleepingcount.”

Therecordsdon’tgiveareasonfortheattack,nordotheysayany­ thingmoreaboutthepilgrim.Thisisoneofthefrustrationsofhis­ toricalrecords.

(43)

25

Hugh, Count of Champagne

Itmayhavebeenthecombinationofhisbrother’sdeathandhis ownnearmissthatconvincedHughtomakeapilgrimagetotheHoly Land.Heleftin1104andreturnedaround1107.It’snotclearwhether heandhisretinueaidedintheongoingfighttokeepthelandwonby thefirstcrusadersorsimplyvisitedthepilgrimsites.

WhileHughwasoffonhisjourneyhiswife,Constance,decided she’dhadenough.SheandHughhadbeenmarriedelevenyearsand hadnochildren.Fortunately,mostofthenobilityofFrancewerere­ latedinonewayoranotherandsoshewasabletohavethemarriage dissolvedonthegroundsthattheywerecousins.Thiswasthemedi­ evalwayaroundtheprohibitionofdivorceanditwasusedallthe time.ConstancelatermarriedBohemondI,rulerofAntioch,and endedherdaysthere.Herdescendants,especiallythewomen,played importantrolesinthehistoryoftheLatinkingdoms.

SouponhisreturntoChampagnein1107,Hughfoundhimself single.Hesoonmarriedagain,thistimetoElizabethofVarais, daughterofStephentheHardyofBurgundy.Elizabethwasrelatedto anumberofstrong,powerfulwomenofthetime.Shewasthenieceof Clemence,countessofFlanders,andalsoMatilda,duchessofBur­ gundy.HerfirstcousinwasAdelaide,thewifeofLouisVI,kingof France.

InOctober1115,CountHughwasattendingPopeCalixtusIIat theCouncilofReims,whereheandhismenprovidedanescorttothe bishopofMainz.Thepopewas,bytheway,Elizabeth’suncle.Life wasgoingwellagainforthecountofChampagne.

Therefore,itwasstrangethatwhenElizabethpresentedHugh withason,herefusedtobelieveitwashisandsaidsopublicly.Thedat­ ingoftheblessedeventisuncertain,around1117.Hughhadgoneon hissecondpilgrimagetoJerusalemin1116anditcouldhavebeenthat hiswifetriedtoconvincehimthatshehadhadafourteen­monthpreg­ nancy.ButthereasonHughgavewasthathisdoctorshadalltoldhim thathewassterile,sohemayhavethoughtthatitwaschronologically possibleforhimtobethefather.Inanyevent,thechild,Eudes,and hismotherwererepudiated.

(44)

26 The Real History Behind the Templars

astothelegitimacyofthebabythatnogreatstormofprotesthit Hugh.WhileEudeshadfriendswhotookhissideovertheyears,he wasneverabletoattractenoughsupporttobeathreattothenext countofChampagne,Hugh’snephew,Thibaud.Eudeswasgivena smallfiefandallowedtoliveouthislifeinpeace.

Hughdidnottryanothermarriage.In1125heabdicatedascount andreturnedtoJerusalem,wherehejoinedthenewlyformedTem­ plars.Hediedtheresometimeafter1130.

ThestoryofHugh,countofTroyesandChampagne,isoneofthe realmysteriesoftheTemplarsaga.Accordingtolegend,theorderwas formedin1119,afterHughdePaynsdecidedtoremaininJerusalem whileCountHughreturnedtoTroyes.Didthecounthaveanyinflu­ enceonthedecisionofthefuturefounderoftheordertostaybehind? AsHugh’soverlord,CountHughwouldhavehadtogivehispermis­ sionforHughtoleavehisservice.Wasthecountpartofthisinitial decisiontoformamonasticmilitaryorder?

Wedon’tknow.Noneofthechroniclersmentionhim,exceptto notethatheendedhislifeasaTemplar.Isitbecausetheywereembar­ rassedtosaythatthecountofChampagnechosetobecomesubservi­ enttoamanwhohadoncebeenoneofhisvassals?CountHugh seemstohavebeenaconsummatewarrior.Hespentmostofhislife fightingoronpilgrimage.Heseemsamuchmorelikelycandidatefor beingthefounderoftheTemplarsthanHughdePayns.

Buthewasn’t.Hediedasamemberoftheorder,nothingmore. ChampagnewenttoThibaud,thegreat­grandsonofWilliamthe ConquerorandthesonofCountStephen­Henry,whohaddiedasa soldierofGod.AndHughfadedintoafootnotetoTemplarhistory.

MichelBur,LaformationducomtédeChampagne(UniversitedeLilleIII,1977)p.259.

Bur,p.267.

ThierryLeroy,HughesdePayns,ChevalierChampenois,Fondateurdel’OrdredesTempliers(Troyes:

LaMaisonduBoulanger,2001).

Bur,473–74,quotingtheanonymoushistorianoftheFirstCrusade.

(45)

27

Hugh, Count of Champagne

Ibid. Bur,p.274.

Ibid.Constance’slifestoryisreallymuchmoreinterestingthanHugh’sinmyopinion. OdericVitalis,TheEcclesiasticalHistoryofOrdericVitalisVol.VI,p.252.

(46)

C H A P T E R F I V E

BernardofClairvaux

H

ecalledhimselfthechimeraofhisage.Hewasamassofcon­

tradictions.Bernard,abbotofClairvaux,wasamonkwho spentmostofhistimeoutofthecloister,aspiritualmanwhoseemed alwaysembroiledinpoliticsandamanofpeacewhoconvincedthou­ sandstofightanddiefortheirfaith.Therearemanywhobelievethat itwashischampionshipoftheTemplarsthatmadetheirsurvivalpos­ sible.

Bernardentershistoryin1113whenheappearsatthegatesofthe monasteryofCiteauxdemandingtobecomeamonk.Thisisacom­ monthemeinstoriesofmedievalsaints.ButBernard’sstoryisslightly different.Insteadoffleeingtheworld,heseemstohavebroughtit along.Bernardhadconvincedthirtyofhisfriendsandrelativesto enterthemonasterywithhim.

Bernardwasbornin1090,thethirdsonofTecelindeTroisFon­ tainesandhiswife,AlethdeMontbard.Theywereofthelowernobil­ ityoftheareaaroundDijon.Bernard’sbrotherswerealltrained warriorswhofoughtfortheirlords,usuallythedukeofBurgundy. Hischildhoodseemstohavebeenhappy.Hewasdevotedtoboth parents,particularlyhismother,whodiedwhenhewasinhisteens.

(47)

29

Bernard of Clairvaux

Bartholomew,Andrew,andNivardandhisuncleGaudryalsobecame monks.GuywasalreadymarriedandhadsmalldaughtersandyetBer­ nardhadconvincedhimtoleavehisfamilyandjoinhim.Notonly that,healsoconvincedGuy’swifetoagreetothisandenteracon­ vent.

Suchenthusiasmcouldn’tbecontainedinoneplace.Withinthree years,BernardhadleftCiteauxtofoundaCistercianabbeyofhisown atClairvaux,justnorthofDijon.

It’sclearthatfromanearlyage,Bernardhadincrediblepowersof persuasion.

ButhowdidthisdevoutmonkbecomeinvolvedwiththeTem­ plars?Atfirstglance,itseemsanunlikelypairing.

However,whenwelookabitcloser,thedistancebetweenBernard ofClairvauxandtheKnightsoftheTempleisn’tsofar.Thefounderof

theTemplars,HughdePayns,camefromanareanearthatofBer­

nard’sfamily.TheymayevenhaveknowneachotherbeforeBernard leftforCiteaux.BernardcertainlyknewCountHughofChampagne,

whohadabandonedhislordshiptojointheTemplarsinJerusalem.In alettertoHugh,writtenabout1125,Bernardlamentsthatthecount hasdecidedtotravelsofarawaytodevotehimselftoGod,and,even thoughheiscertainthatitisthewilloftheMostHigh,hestillwill missthecount,whohasbeensogeneroustotheCistercianorder.

ThestrongestconnectionisthatthefirstTemplarscamefrom thesameworldthatBernardwasborninto.Theyweregenerallyfrom thelowernobility,mentrainedforwarintheserviceofgreaterlords. Theywerenotwelleducated,perhapslearningtoreadFrenchbutnot Latin.Yetmanyofthemfeltuneasyabouttheroletheywereaskedto playinsociety.TheyreceivedmixedsignalsfromtheChurch,which forbadethekillingofotherChristians,buthonoredknightsasprotec­ torsoftheweakandtheliteratureofthetime,whichpraisedvaliant andsuccessfulwarriors.Theknightsknewthatsuccessinbattlewas thekeytoadvancingtheirposition.

(48)

30 The Real History Behind the Templars

knightswhofoughtforChristwasthenextbestthing.Perhapsitwas CountHughwhosuggestedtoBaldwinII,kingofJerusalem,that

theTemplarsaskBernardtousehisinfluencetoconvincethepope, InnocentII,andthegreatlordsofEurope,tosupporttheneworder.

Asonemightguess,Bernardneverdidanythinghalfway.Hewas presentattheCouncilofTroyesin1129toseetheofficialrecognition oftheTemplars.Evenbeforethat,hemayhavewrittenhispassionate defenseoftheorder,OntheNewKnighthood.

OntheNewKnighthoodwaswrittenintheformofalettertoHugh

dePayns,inresponsetohisrequestfora“sermonofexhortation”to thebrothersoftheTemple.Scholarshavepuzzledoverthisopenletter forcenturies.Init,BernardwriteslikeaRomangeneralsendingthe centurionsofftobattlethebarbarians.

HebeginsbycomparingtheKnightsoftheTempletosecular knights.Thesecularknightfightsandkillsforhisownbenefitand glory.Healsodresseslikeadandy,withlonghair,draggingsleeves, pointedshoes,andhisbodybedeckedwithgoldandjewels.Bernard contraststhiswiththesimpleandpracticalgearoftheTemplars.Both theLatinandFrenchRulesoftheorderreflectthisconcernwithex­

travagantclothingandmayshowBernard’sinfluence.

ButBernardisjustwarmingup.Hesoongoesbeyondeventhe crusadingideathatitismeritorioustofightforGod.Hestatesseveral timesthatkillingtheenemyofGodisagoodthinganddyingwhile doingsomeansinstantadmissiontoheaven.“FordeathforChristis nosin,whetheronekillsoriskilled,butmeritsgreatglory.”Againhe says,“Ifhekillsanevildoer,itisnothomicidebut,ifImightputitso, evilcide.”

(49)

31

Bernard of Clairvaux

Ofcourse,thatdoesn’tsaymuchforthepooltheTemplarshaveto recruitfrom.

Afterpraisingthelifestyleandmissionoftheknights,Bernard thentakesthereaderonatourofthemainpilgrimagesites:the TempleofSolomon,Bethlehem,Nazareth,theMountofOlivesand theValleyofJosaphat,theJordanRiver,Calvary,theHolySepulcher, Bethpage,andBethany.

Whatisgoingonhere?Whyisthismonktellingthesementhat it’snotonlyallrighttokillnon­Christians,it’sactuallyagoodthing? Bernarddoesreininabitatonepoint,sayingthattheinfidelsshouldn’t bedestroyedifthereissomeotherwaytokeepthemfromattacking thepilgrims,butbetterinfidelsdiethanus.

Certainly,the“letter”totheTemplarsfitsinwiththecrusading tradition.ThreehundredyearsbeforetheFirstCrusade,Charlemagne invadedandconqueredtheSaxonsseveraltimes,undertheexcuseof “converting”them.ButBernarddoesn’tmentionpersuasionwhen dealingwiththeSaracens.Heseemsdeterminedtoglorifyslaughter­

ingthem.

WasthisletterreallywrittentostiffenthebackbonesoftheTem­ plars?Didtheydoubttherighteousnessoftheircause?Orwasthisfor therestofChristendom,includingthosewhowereuneasyaboutthese knight­monks?Bernardsaysthathewrotetheletterattheinsistence ofHughdePayns.Butwhowastherealintendedaudience?

ItseemsclearthatthiswasBernard’sattempttomakesurethat theOrderoftheTemplarswouldbeacceptedinEurope.It’spossible thatheevenwrotehisexhortationbeforetheofficialrecognitionofthe orderattheCouncilofTroyes.Everythingaboutitsoundslikea

(50)

32 The Real History Behind the Templars

Finally,whywasitsoimportantthatthisabbotgetthewordout? Whynotaletterbythepopeoratleastanarchbishop?

Oneansweristhatfromabout1120through1147,Bernard,abbot ofClairvaux,wasprobablythemostinfluentialmaninChristendom. Thesameintensepassionthatconvincedmostofhisfriendsandfam­ ilytogiveupaworldlylifeforastrictmonasticonehadbeenletloose upontherestofEurope.Bernardwasatirelesswriterandhenever mincedwords.Hegaveadvicetomostoftherulersoftheday,chided otherabbotsforlaxity,andluredtherowdystudentsofParisaway fromthebrothelandintothecloister.

IhavebeentryingtogetahandleonBernardformorethanthirty yearsnowandhestillslipsaway.Themanwasobviouslyimmensely charismatic.Hehadawaywithwordsthatnotranslationcancom­ pletelyevoke.It’sworthlearningLatinjusttowatchBernardplay withthelanguage.Hispersonallifeseemstohavebeenabovere­ proach.

Ontheotherhand,hewasaterriblenag.Someofhislettersareso criticalthatpeoplemusthavecringedwhentheysawhissealonthem. Healsotendedtogooverboardforcauseshebelievedin.Theexhorta­ tiontotheTemplarsisoneexample.AnotherthingthatIhaven’t quiteforgivenhimforishisdeterminationtoseethattheworkofthe teacherandphilosopherPeterAbelardwascondemned.

Hisenthusiasmfinallybackfiredonhimwiththefailureofthe

SecondCrusade,in1149,whichhehadpreached.Thefirstsignthat

thingswereunravelingwaswhenhelearnedthatamonknamed RadulfwasencouragingthecrusaderstomassacretheJewsinthe Rhineland.Bernardwashorrifiedandheimmediatelyracedthereto stopthemurders,withmuchsuccess.Ephraim,aJewfromBonn,who wasachildatthetime,laterwrote,“TheLordheardouroutcry,and Heturnedtousandhadmercyuponus...Hesentadecentpriest, onehonoredandrespectedbyalltheclergyinFrance,namedAbbé BernardofClairvaux,todealwiththisevilperson.Bernard...said tothem:‘ItisgoodthatyougoagainsttheIshmaelites.Butwhosoever touchesaJewtotakehislife,islikeonewhoharmsJesushimself.’”

(51)

33

Bernard of Clairvaux

eredasaintbysomeandanopinionatedbusybodybyothers.Hewas canonizedshortlyafterhisdeathand,evenbeforehedied,atleastone ofhisfriendsstartedwritinghisbiographywithaneyetosainthood.

Therewerethosewhoalsovilifiedhimforhispreachingofthe crusadesandforhisintoleranceofPeterAbelardandotherscholars. OneofthemostviciousofBernard’sdetractorswastheEnglishwriter WalterMap.MapwasonlyaboutthirteenyearsoldwhenBernard diedin1153,buthislaterassociationwithCistercianmonksandhis admirationforAbelardseemstohavesouredhimontheabbot.He callsBernardaLucifer,shiningbrighterthantheotherstarsofnight, andtellsstoriesofhowhefailedtoperformmiracles,includinghow Bernardcouldnotraiseaboyfromthedead.“MasterBernardbade thebodybecarriedintoaprivateroom,and,‘shuttingeveryoneout helayupontheboy,andafteraprayerarose;buttheboydidnotarise, forhelaytheredead.’ThereuponI[Map]remarked,‘Hewassurely themostunluckyofmonks;forneverhaveIheardofamonklying downuponaboywithouttheboyarisingimmediatelyafterthe monk.’”

WalterMapalsodespisedTemplars,Hospitallers,Jews,andher­ eticsbuthesavedhismostacidcommentsfortheCisterciansandtheir reveredabbot.HisgreatestcomplaintaboutBernardand,byexten­ sion,theTemplars,wasnotthattheyweredepravedorsacrilegious butthattheywereproudandgreedy.ThisviewoftheTemplarswasto continuethroughouttheirexistence.

ItmaybethatBernard’sfamedidgotohishead,althoughhis pridewasmostlyinhisabsoluteconvictionthatheknewbest.The Cistercianswhocameafterhimmaywellhavedonetheirbesttoget andkeepallthepropertytheycould,butinthattheywerenodifferent frommostothermonasticorders.

(52)

34 The Real History Behind the Templars

WilliamofSt.Thierry,VitaPrimaBernardi,BooksIV–VIII.

RobertFossier,“LaFondationdeClairvauxetlaFamilledeSaintBernard,inMélangesSaint Bernard(Dijon,1953)pp.19–27.

BrianPatrickMcGuire,TheDifficultSaint.

WilliamofSt.Thierry,BookV,SanctiBernardiAbbatisClarae­Vallensis,OperaOmniaVol.I (Paris:Mabillion,1839).Guycouldnotbecomeamonkwithouthiswife’spermission.The conventofJullywasfoundedforotherfemalefamilymembersandwivesofmenwishingto becomeCistercians.

ThierryLeRoy,HuguesdePayns(Troyes:MaisonduBoulanger,1999)p.71.

BernardofClairvaux,“EpistolaXXXI,”SanctiBernardiAbbatisClarae­Vallensis,OperaOmnia

Vol.I(Paris:Mabillion,1839)p.175.

Marquisd’Albon,CartularieGénéraldul’OrdreduTemple1119?–1150(Paris,1913)p.1.

BernardofClairvaux,“ExhortatioadMilitesTempli,”ibid.CaputIII4,cols.1256–57.“Quando­

quidemmorsproChristovelferenda,velinferenda,etnihilhabeatcriminis,etpluimum gloriaemereatur.”

Ibid.“Sanecumocciditmalefactorum,nonhomicidased,utitadixerum,malicida.”  Ibid.,CaputI1,col.1255.“NamsibeatiquiinDominemoriuntur,nummultomagisquipro

Dominomoriuntur?”

 Ibid.,CaputV10,col.1262.

 Ibid.,CaputII4,col.1257.“NonquidemvelPaganinecandiesset,siquomodoaliterpossenta

nimiainfestioneseuoppressionefideliumcohiberi.Nuncautemmeliusestutoccidantur,quam cartereliquaturvigaextendantjustiadiniquitatemmaunussuas.”Mineisaloosetranslation, butthat’sthegistofit.

 Theworkisnotdatedandcouldhavebeenwrittenanytimebetweenabout1125and1130.  EphraimofBonn,SeferZekira,tr.ScholmoEidelmaninTheJewsandtheCrusaders(University

ofWisconsinPress,1977)p.122.

(53)

C H A P T E R S I X

HughdePaynsTakes

theTemplarsontheRoad

B

y1127,theKnightsoftheTemplewereestablishedintheHoly

Land.Evenintheirearlystate,theyhadsoimpressedFulkof Anjouthat,in1124,hehadgiventhemthirtythousandlivresfromthe rentsofhislands.Otherlordshadalsodonatedproperty,especiallyin HughdePayns’homecountyofChampagne.

Butthenumberofmenwhohaddecidedtodevotetheirlivesto theorderwasstillfartoofew.SoitwasdecidedthatHugh,alongwith fellowknightsGodfreyofSt.Omer,PaynsofMontdidier,andRobert ofCraon,wouldundertakeajourneyofrecruitment.Itisinteresting thatthemenchosenwerefromvariouspartsofFrance.Godfreywas fromPicardyinthenorthandRobertwasaBurgundian.

ThegroupprobablymadeastopatRome,althoughthereisno recordofitorofameetingwiththepope,HonoriusII.Theythen wentontoTroyes,theseatofthecountsofChampagne.Although

HughofChampagnewasstillalive,hedidnotaccompanytheparty.

Hisnephew,Thibaud,wasnowcount.Thibaudwelcomedtheknights andhereHughmayhaveseenhisfamilyforthefirsttimeinoverten yearsandmadefurtherarrangementsforthedisposalhisownland.

(54)

36 The Real History Behind the Templars

thatwassplitamongtheTemplars,thebishopofChartres,theabbey oftheTrinityatVendome,andtheabbeyofFontevrault.Atthis point,FulkprobablyreceivedtheofferfromKingBaldwintomarry hiseldestdaughter,Melisande.OnAscensionDay(May28)of1128

Fulkdecidedtotakethecross(andthekingdom).Hughwaspresent forthisceremony,aswasGautierdeBure,theconstableofJerusalem, whohadbeensentexpresslytobringthemarriageproposal.

ThepartywentontothecountyofPoitou,northwestofAnjou, wherevariouslordsgavegenerouslytotheneworder.Itwouldbenice tothinkthatatthistimeHughmayhaveseentheyoungEleanorof Aquitaine,whowouldonedaymakethepilgrimagetotheHoly

Land,ontheSecondCrusade,asthewifeofLouisVIIofFrance.

Butthereisnoevidencethatsheorherfather,thecountofPoitou, metwiththeTemplars.

HughthenvisitedKingHenryIofEnglandathiscourtinNor­ mandy,beforegoingontoEnglandandScotland.Henryapparently gavetheTemplars“goldandsilver”andannuallyadded“manysubsi­ diesinarmsandotherequipment.”

ThechroniclesofWaverleyAbbeyinEnglandtellofHugh’strip “withtwoknightsoftheTempleandtwoclerics.”Theknightswent alloverEnglandandasfarnorthasScotland,“andmanytookthe crossthatyearandthosefollowingandtooktheroutefortheHoly places.”

(55)

37

Hugh de Payns Takes the Templars on the Road

FinallythepartyreturnedtoTroyessometimearoundJanuary 1129.Theretheyreceivedahouse,agrange,landandfieldsnearthe suburbofPreizefromaRaoulCrassus(thefat)andhiswife,Hélène. ThisdonationalmostcertainlybecamethecommanderyofTroyes. WitnessingitwereHugh,Godfrey,andPaynsalongwithTemplars namedRalphandJohn.Itseemsthatthetriphadbeenworthit.

OnlyonethingmorewasneededtomakesuretheOrderofthe KnightsoftheTempleofSolomonwassecurelyestablished.And Hughwasabouttogetit.

OrdericVitalis,TheEccesiasticalHistoryofOdericVitalisvol.VI,ed.andtr.MargeryChibnall (Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress,1978)pp.310–11.

ThierryLeRoy,HuguesdePayns.(Troyes:MaisonduBoulanger,1999)pp.72–76.

Ibid.,p.195. Ibid.,p.76.

RobertofTorigni,GestaNormannorumDucamVol.II,BookVII,pp.32–34,ed.andtr.Elisa­

bethM.C.VanHouts(Oxford:OxfordMedievalTexts;1995)p.257.Isayapparentlybecause thereisn’tanyrecordofHenry’sgenerosity,exceptRobert’saccount.

(56)

C H A P T E R S E V E N

TheCouncilofTroyes

A

ttheendof1128,HughdePaynsmadehiswaybackfromthe

tourofnorthernFrance,England,andFlanderstohisbirth­ placeinChampagne.Herehewouldatlastreceiveofficialrecognition oftheTemplarsasamonasticorder.

AchurchcouncilconvenedatthetownofTroyesonJanuary13, 1129.Thepope,HonoriusII,didnotattend.Insteadhesenthislegate, Matthew,cardinal­bishopofAlbano,whohadbeenapriestinParis. Thereweretwoarchbishops,RenaudofReimsandHenryofSens.There werealsoanumberofabbots,fourfromtheCistercianorder,among themBernardofClairvaux.Therewerealsotenbishopsandtwo “masters,”thatis,scholars,AlbericofReimsandFulger.

(57)

39

The Council of Troyes

However,theclericswerenotreallypreparedtomakeamonastic Ruleformenwhosemainfunctionwasnottopraybuttofight.Wisely, theyaskedtheadviceofmenwhounderstoodtheactivelife.Alongwith theclerics,Thibaud,countofChampagneandnephewandheirof

HughofChampagne,andWilliam,countofNevers,werepresent.The

secretaryofthecouncil,Matthew,explainsthepresenceofthese“illit­ erates”bysayingthattheywereloversoftheTruthwhocarefullywent overtheTemplarRuleandthrewoutanythingthatdidn’tseemreason­ able.“Itwasforthisthattheywereatthecouncil.”

TheLatinRulemadeprovisionsfortheneedsoftheknights.Un­ likeothermonks,whoatefishandeggs,Templarswereallowedred meatthreetimesaweek.Iftheyweretootired,theyneedn’tgetupin themiddleofthenightforprayers.TheRulealsoallowedtheknights tohavehorsesandservantstomaintainthem.

Theclericsdidtaketheopportunitytocomeoutstronglyagainst currentfashion.Theyforbadetheknightstowearimmoderatelylong hairandbeards,shoeswithlongcurlingpoints,lacyfrills,orexces­ sivelylongtunics.Obviouslytheaverageknightontheroadwasabit ofadandy.

Thenoblepursuitsofhuntingandhawkingwerealsoforbidden, withtheexceptionoflionhunting,“becausehe[thelion]isalways searchingforsomeonetodevourandhisstrengthisagainstallsoall strengthisagainsthim.”Thisshowsthatnotallthedangerinapil­ grimagewasfromhumanattackers.However,thecouncilmayhave beenthinkingofabiblicalanalogyhere,ofthelionfallinguponthe flockoffaithfulpilgrims.

OthersectionsoftheRuleconcernbehavioratmeals,caringfor brotherswhobecomeill,andothercommoncustomsofmonasticlife;for instance,allpropertywaskeptincommonandprayersweresaidseven timesaday.SincetheknightswerenotexpectedtounderstandLatin, theyweretoldtosimplyrepeattheLord’sPrayeratthecorrecttimes.

(58)

40 The Real History Behind the Templars

anymanofreligiontopaytoomuchattentiontothefacesofwomen; thereforenobrothermaytakethelibertyofkissingawidow,noravir­ ginnorhismother,norhissister,norhisfriend,noranyotherwoman.” Thiswastakenforgrantedinmostmonastichouses,wherethemonks spentmostoftheirtimewelloutofsightofanyfemaletemptation.But it’sclearthatthecouncilworriedthatafteraharddayoffightingSara­ cens,itmightbedifficultforaKnightoftheTempletorememberthat,

whilehecouldstillpillage,rapewasnolongeranoption.

WhiletheLatinRulesoonprovedtoneedalotofeditingandaddi­ tions,forthepresentHughdePaynswassatisfiedwiththeresultsofthe council.HereturnedtoJerusalemby1131,withfreshrecruits,donations, andaformalRulefortheKnightsTemplartoliveby.Theywerenowan acceptedpartofthereligiouslifeintheWestaswellastheEast.

Olderaccountsgivethisdateas1128butthiswascausedbyconfusionsurroundingthefactthat

manypeopleinthetwelfthcenturystartedtheNewYearinspring,notthemiddleofwinter.

Charles­JosephHefeleandDomH.Leclercq,HistoiredeConcilesd’aprèslesDocuments OriginauxVol.V(Paris:LetouzeyetAné,1912)p.670.

LaurentDailliez,RègleetStatusdel’OrdreduTemple,2nded(Paris:ÉditionsDervy,1972).Re­

printoftheLatinRulefrom1721,pp.325–26.ThebishopswerefromChartres,Soissons,Paris, Troyes,Orleans,Chalons,Laon,andBeauvais,allroughlyfromthenorthandeastofFrance. WilliamofNevers’sson,Raynald,diedaprisoneroftheTurksduringtheSecondCrusade. WilliamendedhisdaysasaCarthusianmonk.

BernardofClairvaux,OperaOmniaVol.1(Paris,1839)letter21,col.164–65.“Savientissiquidem acutaefebrisexustaardoribus,etexhaustasudoribus.”Thatis,hehadafeverthatworehim out.

Dailliez,pp.327–59. Ibid.,p.326. Ibid.,p.332,capitula10. Ibid.,pp.335–36,capitula18.

Ibid.,p.340,capitula29.“Derostris&laqueismanifestumest&Gentiles:&cumabomina­

bile,hocomnibusagnoscatur,prohibimus...capillorumsuperflitaten&vestiumimmoder­ atanlongitudinembarberenonpermittimus.”

 Ibid.,p.348.“Quiaipsecircuit,quaerensquemdevoret,&manusejuscontraomnes,omni­

umquemanuscontraeum.”

 Ibid.,p.359,capitula72.“PericulosumessecredimusomniReligionivultummulierumnimis

(59)

C H A P T E R E I G H T

GoForthandMultiply

O

necantracetherecruitingjourneyofHughandhiscompan­

ionsbyrecordsofthegiftsdonatedtothem.Bothgreatlords andminoroneslineduptomakedonationstotheTemplars.Thiswas notonlybecausetheybelievedinthecausebut,asisstilltrue,thesup­ portofimportantpeoplebroughtingiftsfromtherankandfile,who wishedtoassociatethemselvesincharitywiththeirlocalrulers.

AftertheCouncilofTroyes,HughdePaynsreturnedtoJerusa­

lem,butotherTemplarscontinuedtocrisscrossEuropeseekingsup­ portfortheneworder.

Inthesouth,HughRigaud,anotherTemplar,wasbusycanvass­ ingfortheorder.Asearlyas1128,hewasinToulouse,wherePeter Bernardandhiswife,Borella,gavethemselvesandeverythingthey ownedtotheTemplars,withtheprovisionthat,iftheyhadchildren whowantedtojointheorder,theywouldbeallowedto.Rigaudspent thenextseveralyearsgettingdonationsfortheTemple,rangingfrom lands,tithes,andvineyardsto“ashirtandpants”fromatownswoman “and,afterherdeath,herbestcloak.”HughRigaudcanbefoundac­ ceptingdonationchartersinsouthernFranceandnorthernSpain throughthe1130s.

(60)

42 The Real History Behind the Templars

welltoreceivegrantsoffields,houses,vines,horses,oldclothes,and evenserfs,buttheseweren’tthingsthatcouldbeputinanonlineauc­ tionforquickcash.Manyofthegiftscouldn’tbeuseduntilthedonor haddied.Othersconsistedofacertainpartofaharvesteachyearorso manycheeses.

ThenatureofthegiftstotheordermeantthattheTemplarsneeded toestablishwaystationsofsomesorttoreceivegoodsandtransferthem fromEuropetotheCrusaderStates.GreatmonastichouseslikeCluny andCiteauxwouldestablishpriories,whichweredependenthouses, staffedwithonlyafewmonks.ButtheTemplarsweredesperatefor moremenoffightingagetojoininthebattle,sonewrecruitswereen­ couragedtoleaveforJerusalemassoonaspossible.Thatdidn’tleave anyonetodirectthecollectionandprocessingofsupplies.

ThefactthattheearliestTemplarsweren’tallthatwellorganized isevidentbythevarioustitlesthatHughRigaudisgiveninthechar­ ters.Sometimesheisabrotherofthesociety,sometimesheismen­ tionedonlybyname,andsometimesbythetitle“procurator,”which seemsagooddescriptionofhiswork,althoughit’snotlistedinthe Ruleasanadministrativeposition.

TheTemplarsmayhaveeventuallyestablishedhousesonthe modelofthosealreadyrunbytheHospitallers,whohadbeenreceiv­ inggiftsintheWestsincejustaftertheFirstCrusade(around1100), particularlyinSpainandthesouthofFranceaswellasItaly.

Eventually,theorderorganizeditselfinterritoriesthatwere groupedaccordingtothelanguagesofthebrothers.Theseweremostly French,Spanish,andEnglish,withsomeItaliansandGermans.The TemplarsneverestablishedthemselvesinScandinaviabuttherewere somecommanderiesinHungaryandCroatia.

Occitania

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Tujuan penelitian adalah membuat dan mengaplikasikan selulosa bakterial yang dimodifikasi dengan senyawa dietilentriamina sebagai lapisan pengikat logam dalam sistem

Menjelaskan cara mengajarkan kegiatan mencocok atau membuat bentuk dari bubur kertas pada anak TK.. Memberi contoh cara mengajarkan kegiatan mencocok atau membuat

Kompetensi Umum Menjelaskan konsep-konsep dasar dari ilmu hukum dan hukum positif atau tata hukum di Indonesia.. Kompetensi Khusus Menjelaskan

Kelompok Kerja Unit Layanan Pengadaan (Pokja ULP) Kegiatan Rehabilitasi / Pemeliharaan Jalan, Pekerjaan Pengadaan Aspal Tahun Anggaran 2017 pada Dinas Pekerjaan

[r]

Berkenaan dengan itu, kami mahasiswa politeknik kesehatan tanjung karang akan melakukan Terapi Aktivitas Kelompok Stimulus Persepsi Umum agar dapat memantapkan

Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mendapatkan gambaran variabel kepemimpinan, beban kerja, disiplin kerja dan kinerja pegawai serta mengindentifikasi dan mengetahui

Model penilaian yang digunakan dengan sistem pendukung keputusan ini adalah merupakan tidak memiliki unsur yang harus ada didalam melakukan penilaian, disebabkan