量子力学
Quantum mechanics
School of Physics and Information Technology
Chapter 9
Time-dependent
9.1 Two
9.1 Two--level systems
level systems
Chapter 9
Time-dependent perturbation theory
9.1 Two
9.1 Two--level systems
level systems
9.2 Emission and absorption
9.2 Emission and absorption
of radiation
of radiation
9.1 Two
9.1 Two--level systems
level systems
9.2 Emission and absorption
9.2 Emission and absorption
of radiation
of radiation
9.1 Two-level systems
Suppose that there are just two states of the system. They are
eigenstates of the unperturbed Hamiltonian,and they are eigenstates orthonormal:
0
and
0|
a a a b b b
a b ab
H
ψ
E
ψ
H
ψ
E
ψ
ψ ψ
δ
=
=
=
(0)
c
a ac
b bψ
=
ψ
+
ψ
Any state can be expressed as a linear combination of them
a b ab
In the absence of any perturbation,each component evolves with its characteristic exponential factor:
/ /
( )
1
a a
iE t iE t
a a b b
a b
t
c
e
c
e
c
c
ψ
ψ
−ψ
−2 2
=
+
9.1.1 The perturbed system
Now suppose we turn on a time
Now suppose we turn on a time--dependent perturbation, dependent perturbation, then the wave function can expressed as follows:
then the wave function can expressed as follows:
/ /
( )
( )
iE ta( )
iE taa a b b
t
c t
e
c t
e
ψ
=
ψ
−+
ψ
−If the particle started out in the state
If the particle started out in the state ψaa We solve forWe solve forWe solve forWe solve for
( ) and ( ) by demanding that (t) satisfy the tim-dependent Schr dinger equation
a b
c t c t ψ
H
i
,
t
ψ
ψ
=
∂
∂
'
( )
0H = H
+
H t
where where
/ / ' / 0 0 / / / ' / /
[
]
[
]
[
]
[
]
[
]
a b a
b a b
a b
iE t iE t iE t
a a b b a a
iE t iE t iE t
b b a a b b
iE t iE t
a b
a a b b
c H
e
c H
e
c H
e
c H
e
i c
e
c
e
iE
iE
c
e
c
e
ψ
ψ
ψ
ψ
ψ
ψ
ψ
ψ
− − − − − − − −+
+
+
=
+
+
−
+
−
The first two terms on the left cancel the last two terms on the right, and hence
the right, and hence
/ / ' ' / /
[
]
[
]
[
]
a b a biE t iE t
a a b b
iE t iE t
a a b b
c
H
e
c
H
e
i
c
e
c
e
ψ
ψ
ψ
ψ
− − − −+
=
+
a a bTake the inner product with
, and exploit the orthogonality
of
and
ψ
For short, we define
' '
|
|
ij i j
H
≡
ψ
H
ψ
( ) /
' '
[ i Eb E ta ]
i
c = − c H +c H e− −
' ' *
/
Note that the Hermiticity of entails ( ) . M ultiplying through by ( / ) a , we conclude that
'
ji ji iE t
H H H
- i h e
=
( ) /
' '
[ i Eb E ta ]
a a aa b ab
c = − c H +c H e− −
b
Similarly, the inner product with
ψ
picks out :cb( ) /
' '
[ i Eb E ta ]
b b bb a ba
i
c = − c H + c H e− −
'
Typically, the diagonal matrix elements of H vanish:
' '
0
aa bb
In that case the equations simplify
0
0 '
'
i t
a a b b
i t
b b a b
i
c
H
e
c
i
c
H
e
c
ω
ω
−
−
= −
= −
(1) (1)
where
0
b a
E
E
ω
≡
−
b a 0
9.1.2 Time-Dependent Perturbation Theory
So far, everything is exact: we have made no assumption about the size of the perturbation. But if is "small", we can solve Equation (1) by a process of successive approximations, as
follows. Sup
'
H
(0) 1, (0)
pose the particle starts out in the lower state: ca = cb = 0.
Zeroth Order:
(0) 1, (0)
If there were , they would stay this wa
0
y f
.
oreever
a b
no perturbation at all
c = c =
( 0 ) ( 0 )
( )
1,
0.
a b
c
t
=
c
=
First Order:
'
0 0
(1)
' (1) ' ' '
0
Now we insert
expressions on the right to obtain the
0
1;
( )
a a ti t i t
b
ba b ba
dc
c
dt
d
these
c
i
i
H e
c
H
t e
dt
dt
ω ω=
=
= −
= −
second-order approximation:
S
( )
'' 0 0 ' ' '' 0 0 ' ' '' '' 0(2) ' ' ' '' '' '
2 0 0
( )
1
econd-Order:
( ) 1
(
)
(
)
t
i t i t
a i
ab ba
t t
i t i t
a ab ba
dc
i
H e
H
t e
dt
dt
c
t
H
t e
H
t e
dt
dt
Notes:
(2)
Notice that in my notation
( ) includes the zeroth order
term; the second-order correction would be the integral term
alone.
a
c
t
In principle, we could continue this ritual indefinitely,
th
th
In principle, we could continue this ritual indefinitely,
always inserting the
order approximation into the
right side of Equation (1) and solving for the (
1)
order. Notice that is modified
an
n
c
−
+
−
in every
order,
and in every
border.
even
9.1.3 Sinusoidal Perturbation 9.1.3 Sinusoidal Perturbation
'
'
( , ) ( ) cos(
Suppose the perturbation has sinusoidal time dependence:
so
that
where
To first o
) cos
rder we have
( ), | |
ab ab
ab a b
H r t V r t
H V t
V V ω ω ψ ψ = = =
0 ' '
' ' 0 0 0 0 ' 0 ( ) ( ) ' 0 ( ) ( ) 0 0
( ) cos( )
This is the ans
2 1 1 wer, but = 2 it i t
i t dt
b ba
t
i t i t
ba
i t i t
ba
i
c t V t e
iV
= - e e dt
V e e
-ω ω ω ω ω ω ω ω ω ω ω ω ω ω + − + − ≅ − + − − + + −
Dropping the first term:
0
0 0
0
0 0
( ) /2
( ) /2 ( ) /2 0
( ) /2 0
We assume
|
|
( )
2
sin[(
) / 2]
. s
o
i t
i t i t
ba b
i t
ba
V e
c t
e
e
V
t
i
e
ω ω ω ω ω ω ω ω
ω ω
ω ω
ω ω
ω ω
− − − − −+ >>
−
≅ −
−
−
−
=−
0 00
transition proba
The
---the proba
bility
b
i
e
ω ω
=−
−
2 2 2 0 2 2 0ility that a particle which
started out in the state
will be found, at time, in th
|
| sin [(
) / 2]
( ) |
e state
:
( )|
(2)
(
)
ab
a b b
a b
V
t
P
t
c t
As a function of time, the transition probability oscillates sinusoidally.
P(t)
0
2
| |
π
ω −ω 0
4
| |
π
ω − ω 0
6
| |
π ω − ω
2 0
| | ( )
ab
V
ω −ω
[image:15.842.61.789.54.532.2]t
The probability of a transition is greatest when the driving frequency is close to the “natural”
frequency
P(t)
0
ω
0
[image:16.842.66.781.72.524.2](ω −2 )πt (ω0 +2 )πt ω
9.2 Emission and absorption
of radiation
9.2.1 Electromagnetic Waves
An atom, in the presence of a passing light wave, responds primarily ot the electic component. If the wavelenght is long , we can ignore the spatial variation in the field; the atom is
0
'
0
exposed to a sinusoidally oscillating electric field
The perturbing Hamiltonian is
where is the charge of th
ˆ cos( )
cos(
e electr )
E = E t k
H
q
q
E z t
ω
ω
= −
'
0 cos(
on. Ev
),
idently
9.1 Two
9.1 Two--level systems
level systems
9.2 Emission and absorption
9.2 Emission and absorption
Chapter 9 TIME-DEPENDENT
PERTURBATION THEORY
Chapter 9 TIME-DEPENDENT
PERTURBATION THEORY
9.2 Emission and absorption
9.2 Emission and absorption
of radiation
of radiation
An electromagnetic wave consists of transverse oscillating electric and magnetic fields.
An electromagnetic wave
E
An electromagnetic wave
E
Electric field
u
E
H
o
x
u
E
H
o
x
2
Typically,
is an even or odd function of ; in
either case
is
, and integrates to zero.
This licenses our usual assumption that the
matrix elements of
z|
vanish. Th
|
us
'
z
H
odd
diagonal
ψ
ψ
0
the interaction of light with matter is governed
by precisely the kind of oscillatory perturbation
with
If an atom starts out in the "lower" state , and
9.2.2 Absorption, Stimulated Emission,
you
shine a polarized monochromatic beam of light
and Spontaneous Emiss
on it, the probabilit i of on y a ψ
a transition to the "upper" state
is given by Equation (2), which takes the form
b ψ 2 2 0 0 2 2 0
( ) | | sin [( ) / 2]
( )
a b
E t
P t ω ω
ω ω → ℘ − = − 2 2 0 0 0
|
|
sin
Of course, the probability of a transition
to
[(
) / 2]
to the
lev l
( )
(
e
)
:
b adown
lo
E
wer
t
P
t
ω
ω
ω
ω
→
℘
−
=
0
Three ways in which light interacts with atoms:
In this process, the atom absorbs energy
from the electromagnetic field.
we say that
i
(a) Absorption
"absorbed a photon"
t has
b aE - E
=
ω
If the particle is in the upper state, and you shine
light on it, it can make a transition ot the lower state,
and in fact the probability of such
(b) S
a tran
timulated emissio
sition is exa
n
ctly
the same as for a transition upward from the lower state.
which process, which was first discovered by Einstein,
stimul
is called ated emission.
If an atom in the excited state makes a transition
downward, with the release of a photon but
any applied electromagnetic fi
el
(c) Spontaneous emission
d to initiate the
process.
Thi p
s roc
without
spontane
ess is c
alled
ous emis
sion.
2 0
0
The energy density in an electromagnetic wave is
where E is the amplitude of the electric field.
9.2.3 Incoherent P
So the
transition
er
pr
2
obability is
tur
pro
bation
u =
ε
E
portional to the energy
transition probability is pro
2
2 0
2 2
0 0
sin [(
) / 2
portional to the energy
density of the fields:
This is for
perturbation,
]
2
( )
|
|
consisting of
(
)
a single frequency .
a bt
u
P
t
monochromatic
ω
ω
ε
ω
ω
ω
→
−
=
℘
In many applications the system is exposed to electromagnetic
waves at a whole range of frequencies; in that case
and the net transition probablity takes the form of an integral:
( ) , ( ) a b u d P t
ρ ω ω
→ → = 2 2 02 0 2
0 0
0
replace ( ) by ( ) and take it outside the integral, we
sin [( ) / 2]
2 | | ( ) ( ) get t u d
ω
ω
ρ ω
ω
ε
ω
ρ
ω
ω
ρ
ω
∞ − ℘ − 2 2 0 02 0 2
0
0
0
0
replace ( ) by ( ) and take it outside the integral, we
sin [( ) / 2]
2 | |
( ) ( ) ( get Ch ) (
anging variables to ) / 2, exten
a b
t
P t d
x
ρ
ω
ω
ρ ω
ω
ε
ω
ω
ρ
ω
ω
ω
ω
∞ → − ℘ ≅ − ≡ − 2 2-ding the limits of
integration to , and looking up the define integral
2
0 2
0
we find
This time the transition probability is proportional ot .
When we hit the system with an incoherent spread of
2 |
|
P
a b( )
t
(
)
t
t
ρ ω
ε
→
℘
≅
frequencies. The
transition rat
e
is
no
2
0 2
0
the perturbing wave is coming in al
ong the
-direction and polarized in the
-dir
:
|
|
ec
w
ti
.
a
)
on
(
b a
Not
R
x
z
e
constant :
π
ρ ω
ε
2
But we shall be interested in the case of an atom
bathed in radiation coming from
direction,
and with
possible polarizations. What w
ˆ
|
e
need, in place of
|
, is th
e
o
f
|
all
all
average
n
℘
⋅
|
2,
where
℘
| |
ˆ
(
where
and the average is over both polarizations
and
over all incident direction. This averaging can be
carried out as follows:
)
b a
q
r
n
ψ
ψ
2 2
For propagation in the z-direction, the two possible
polarizations are and
ˆ
ˆ
1 ˆ
ˆ
ˆ
(
Polarization:
, so
)
[(
)
(
) ]
the polarization average
is
2
i
j
n
⋅℘
=
i
⋅℘ +
2j
⋅℘
22
1 ˆ
ˆ
ˆ
(
)
[(
)
(
) ]
2
1
= (
2
2 p
x
n
⋅℘
=
i
⋅℘ +
j
⋅℘
℘ +℘
2 2 2where is the angle between and the direction of
1
)
sin
2
propagation.
y
θ
θ
= ℘
2 2
Now let's set polar axis along and integrate over all
propagation directions to get the polarization-prop
1 1 ˆ
(
Propagation direction:
) sin sin
4 2
agation
average:
2 pp
n =
θ
θ θ φ
d dπ
℘
⋅℘ ℘
4 2
pp
π
2 2
3
0
So the transition rate for stimulated emission from state
to state , under the influence of incoherent, unpolarized
light i
= sin
4 3
ncident from all directions, is
d
b a
π
θ θ
℘ ℘
2
So the transition rate for stimulated emission from
state to state , under the influence of incoherent,
unpolarized light incident from al
l direct
ions
|
s
|
3
, i
b a
b
a
R
π
ε
→
=
℘
2
0
(
)
ρ ω
2 0
|
|
3
b a
R
ε
→
=
℘
00
0
Where is the matrix element of the electric
dipole moment between the two states and
is the energy density in the fields, per unit frequency,
evaluated at
(
)
(
)
(
E
bE
a) / .
ρ ω
ρ ω
ω
℘
9.1 Two
9.1 Two--level systems
level systems
9.2 Emission and absorption
9.2 Emission and absorption
Chapter 9 TIME-DEPENDENT
PERTURBATION THEORY
Chapter 9 TIME-DEPENDENT
PERTURBATION THEORY
9.2 Emission and absorption
9.2 Emission and absorption
of radiation
of radiation
9.3 Spontaneous emission
Picture a container of atoms, of them in the lower
state , and of them in the upper state .
Let be the spontaneous emission rate, so
9.3.1 Einstein's A and B coefficient
( )
th
)
t
s
a (
a
a b b
N
N
A
ψ
ψ
the number of particle leaving the upper state by this process, per unit time, is . The transition rate for
stimulated emission is proportional to the energy density of the electroma
b
N A
0
0
gnetic field---call it .
The number of particles leaving the upper state by this mechanism, per unit time, is .
( )
( )
ba
b ba
B
N B
ρ ω
0 0
0
The absorption rate is likewise proportional to
---call it
The number of particles
per unit joining the upper level is therefore
All told, then,
(
)
(
);
(
).
ab
a ab
B
N B
ρ ω
ρ ω
ρ ω
0a ab
b
dN
0 0
Suppose that these atoms are in thermal equilibrium
with the ambient field, so that the number of particle
i
(
)
(
)
n each level is
.
b b ba a ab
N A
N B
N B
dt
constant
ρ ω
ρ ω
0
In that case
and it follows that
The number of particles with energy , in thermal
equilibrium at temperature , is proportiona / 0, ( ) ( l to ) / b
a b ab ba
dN dt
A
N N B B
E T
ρ ω
= = − het Boltzmann fac
0 0 / / / 0 / , so and hence ( ) a B B a B B
E k T
k T a
3
/
2 3
(
But Planck's blackbody formula
tells us the energy density of thermal radiation:
Comparing the two expressions, we conclude that
an ) d b k T ba
c e B
B B A
ω
ω
ρ ω
π
= − = 3 Bω
=Bab = Bba and A 2 3
2 2 0 3 2 3 0 and
and it follows that the spontaneous emission rateis
Suppose, now, that you have a bottle full of
atoms, with
of them in the excited state.
As a resul
9.3.2 The Lifetime o
t of spontaneous em
( ),
issio
f an Excite
n, this num
d S
ber
tat
w d
e
ill e
b
N t
crease as time goes on; specifically, in a
w d
ill ecrease as time goes on; specifically, in a
time interval
you will lose a fraction of
them:
Solving for
, we find
( )
b b
b
dt
Adt
dN
A
N dt
t
N
N
= −
( )
(0)
Atb
t
N
be
−
evidently the number remaining in the excited
state decreases exponentially, with a time constant
We call this the lifetime of the state ---- technically,
1
A
τ
=
We call this the lifetime of the state ---- technically,
it s
i the time it takes for
to reach of its
initial valu
( )
e
1/
0.
368
.
b
b a
This spontaneous emission formula gives the
transition rate for
regardless of any
other allowed state
N t
e
s.
ψ
ψ
≈
evidently the number remaining in the excited
state decreases exponentially, with a time constant
We call this the lifetime of the state ---- technically,
1
A
τ
=
We call this the lifetime of the state ---- technically,
it s
i the time it takes for
to reach of its
initial valu
( )
e
1/
0.
368
.
b
b a
This spontaneous emission formula gives the
transition rate for
regardless of any
other allowed state
N t
e
s.
ψ
ψ
≈
1 2 3
Typically, an excited atom has many different decay
modes ( that is,
can decay to a large number of
different lower-energy states,
). In that
case the transition rates
, and the
,
net
,
b
a a a
add
ψ
ψ ψ ψ
1
lifetime is
τ
=
' '
1 2 3
' '
, 1 , 1
1
| |
(
While
where is the natural frequency of the oscillator.
)
2
n n n n
A
A
A
n x n
n
n
m
τ
δ
δ
ω
ω
− −
=
+
+
+
'
'
, 1
ˆ
But we're talking about , so
must be than ; for our purpose, then,
Evidently transitions occur only to states one step lower on the "ladder",
2 n n
n
n
n
emission
low
q l
er
m
ω
δ
−℘ =
and the frequency of the photon
'
'
'
( 1 / 2) ( 1 / 2)
Not surprisingly, the sys
emitted is
tem radiates at the classical
oscillator frequency.
( )
En En n n
n n
ω
ω
ω
ω
ω
− + − +
= =
2 2
3 0
3 0
But the transition rate is
and the lifetime of the
stationa
6
6
ry state is
th
nq
A
mc
n
mc
ω
πε
πε
τ
=
=
2 2Meanwhile, each radiate photon carries an energy
n
nq
τ
ω
=
2 2 3 0,
so the
radiated is
:
2 2 3 0
(
1)
1
(
)
6
2
This
or, since the ene
is the average po
rgy of an oscillator
in the
st
wer radiated by a
ate is
,
th
quntum
n
E
n
q
P
E
c
m
ω
ω
ω
πε
=
+
=
−
oscillator with (initial) energy
.
For comp
E
2 2 3 0
arison, let's determine the average power
radiated by a
oscillator with the same energy
According to
:
6
classical
Larmor formu
a
c
a
q
l
P
πε
0 0 2 0 2 4 0 3 0
, ( ) cos( t)
co
For a harmonic oscillator with amplitude
, and the acceleration is
. Averaging over a full cycle,
then
s( t)
12
x x t x
a x q x P c
ω
ω
ω
ω
πε
= = − = 0But the energy of th 2 02
2 2 0 2 4 0 3 0
This is t
(1
he average power radiated by a
oscillator with (initial)
e oscillator is ,
so ,and herenc
energy .
/ 2) 2 / 6
E m x
x E m
The calculation of spontaneous emission rates has
been reduced to a matter of evaluating matrix elements
of the form
9.3.3 Sele
ctive Rules
| |
b
r
aψ
ψ
Suppose we are i
b a
nterested in systems like hydrogen, for
which the Hamiltonian is spherically symmetrical. In that
case we may specify the states with the usual quantum
numbers
n,l,
and , and the matrix elements
m
' ' '
are
Consider first the commutations of with
and
w
hich we worked out in
Chap
:
,
[
]
, [
]
From the thi
,
rd
[
ter
]
0.
4
z
z z z
'
L
x, y,
z
L ,x
i y
L , y
i x
L ,z
a) Selection rules involving m and m :
=
=
=
of these it follows that
' ' '
' ' '
' ' ' ' '
' ' ' '
| [
] |
| (
) |
| [(
)
(
)) |
(
|
)
|
z
z z
0
n l m
L ,z nlm
n l m
L z
zL
nlm
n l m
m
z
z m
nlm
m
m
n l m z nlm
=
=
−
=
−
' ' '
So unless
, the matrix elements of are
always zero.
(1
Either
', o
r else
| |
=0.
)
'
m
m
n l m z nlm
m
m
z
Conclusion :
=
=
' ' ' ' ' '
Meanwhile, from the commutator of with
we ge
| [
] |
| (
t
)
z
z z z
L
x
n l m
L ,x nlm
=
n l m
L x xL
−
' ' ' ' ' ' '
|
(
)
| |
| |
nlm
m
m
n l m x nlm
i
n l m y nlm
' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' '
(
)
|
|
|
|
| [
Finally, the commutator of
with yields
] |
| (
) |
(
)
|
|
|
|
z
z z z
m
m
n l m
x
Conclus
nlm
i n l m
y nlm
L
y
n l m
L , y
nlm
n l m
L y
yL
nlm
m
m
n l m
y nlm
i
n l m
i
x
o
nlm
n :
−
=
=
−
=
−
=
' ' ' '
(
)
|
m
|
Conc
m
lusio
n l m
y nlm
n :
−
' ' '' 2 ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' '
|
|
(
)
|
|
(
)
|
|
an
|
|
d
i n l m
x nlm
m
m
n l m
x nlm
i m
m
n l m
y nlm
n l m
x nlm
=
−
=
−
' 2
' ' ' ' ' '
and hence
either
or else
From Equations (1) and (2), we obtain the selection
rule
(
)
1,
|
|
|
|
0
No transitions occur
for :
(
unless
1 or 0
2)
m
m
n l m
x nlm
n l m
y nlm
m
m
−
=
=
=
∆
= ±
No transitions occur
This is an easy
unless
1 or 0
r
m
∆
= ±
esult ot understand if you remember
that the photon carries spin 1, and henc its value of
is 1, 0, or -1; conservation of angular momentum
requires that the atom give up whatever the photon
takes
m
2 2 2 2 2
' ' '
The commutation relation:
As before, we sandwich this commutation between
and to derive the sele
[ [ , ]] 2 ( )
ctio
'
L , L r rL L r
n l m nlm
b) Selection rules involving l and l :
= +
' ' ' 2
| [ ,[ ]] |
n rule:
n l m' ' ' L2 L ,r nlm
2 ' ' ' 2 2
4 ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' 2 2 2 2
4 ' ' 2 ' ' '
| [ ,[ ]] |
2 | ( ) |
2 [ ( 1) ( 1)] | |
| ( [ , ] [ , ] ) |
[ ( 1) ( 1)] | |
z
n l m L L ,r nlm
n l m rL L r nlm
l l l l n l m r nlm
n l m L L r L r L nlm
l l l l n l m r nlm
= −
= + + +
= −
' ' ' ' 2
' ' '
' ' ' ' '
2[ (
1)
(
1)]
[ (
1)
(
1)]
|
|
Either
or else
But
=0
[ (
1)
(
1)]=(
1)(
1)
:
l l
l l
l l
l l
n l m r nlm
l l
l l
l
l
l
Conclusion
+
+
+
=
+
−
+
+
−
+
+ +
+
' ' ' ' 2 ' 2
' ' 2 ' 2
and
so
2[ (
1)
(
1)]=(
1)
(
)
1
(
1)
(
)
1=0
l l
l l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
+
+
+
+ +
+
−
−
+ +
+
−
−
'
The first factor cannot be zero, so the condition
Thus we obtain the selection rule for :
Again, this result is easy to interpret: The
No transitions occur unless
1
l
l
∆ = ±
Again, this result is easy to interpret: The
photon carries spin 1, so the rules for addition
of angular momen
' ''
1,
tum woul
1
d
or
.
l
l
l
l
l
l
= +
=