• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Addthis Arens Chapter09

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "Addthis Arens Chapter09"

Copied!
41
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing,

©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e,Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley Arens/Elder/Beasley 9 - 1

Materiality and Risk

Materiality and Risk

Chapter 9

(2)

Learning Objective 1

Learning Objective 1

Apply the concept of materiality

Apply the concept of materiality

to the audit.

(3)

©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing,

©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e,Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasleyr Arens/Elder/Beasleyr 9 - 9 - 33

Materiality

Materiality

(4)

Materiality

Materiality

The auditor’s responsibility is to determine whether financial statements are

materially misstated.

If there is a material misstatement, the auditor will bring it to the client’s

(5)

©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing,

©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e,Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasleyr Arens/Elder/Beasleyr 9 - 9 - 55

Steps in Applying Materiality

Steps in Applying Materiality

Planning extent of tests Step

1

(6)

Steps in Applying Materiality

Steps in Applying Materiality

Evaluating results

Step 3

Estimate total

misstatement in segment

Step 4

Estimate the

combined misstatement

(7)

©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing,

©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e,Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasleyr Arens/Elder/Beasleyr 9 - 9 - 77

Learning Objective 2

Learning Objective 2

Make a preliminary judgment

Make a preliminary judgment

about what amounts to

about what amounts to

consider material.

(8)

Set Preliminary Judgment About

Set Preliminary Judgment About

Materiality

Materiality

This preliminary judgment is the maximum amount by which the auditor believes the statements could be misstated and still not

Auditors decide early in the audit

(9)

©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing,

©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e,Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasleyr Arens/Elder/Beasleyr 9 - 9 - 99

Factors Affecting Judgment

Factors Affecting Judgment

Materiality is a relative rather than an absolute concept.

Bases are needed for evaluating materiality.

(10)

Guidelines

Guidelines

Accounting and auditing standards do not provide specific materiality guidelines to practitioners.

(11)

©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing,

©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e,Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasleyr Arens/Elder/Beasleyr 9 - 9 - 1111

Learning Objective 3

Learning Objective 3

Allocate preliminary materiality

Allocate preliminary materiality

to segments of the audit

to segments of the audit

during planning.

(12)

Allocate Preliminary Judgment

Allocate Preliminary Judgment

About Materiality to Segments

About Materiality to Segments

This is necessary because evidence is accumulated by segments rather than for the financial statements as a whole.

(13)

©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing,

©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e,Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasleyr Arens/Elder/Beasleyr 9 - 9 - 1313

Learning Objective 4

Learning Objective 4

Use materiality to evaluate

Use materiality to evaluate

audit findings.

(14)

Estimated Total Misstatement

Estimated Total Misstatement

and Preliminary Judgment

and Preliminary Judgment

Cash

Accounts receivable Inventory

Total estimated

misstatement amount Preliminary judgment

(15)

©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing,

©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e,Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasleyr Arens/Elder/Beasleyr 9 - 9 - 1515

Estimated Total Misstatement

Estimated Total Misstatement

and Preliminary Judgment

and Preliminary Judgment

Net misstatements in the sample ($3,500)

× Total recorded population value ($450,000) ÷ Total sampled ($50,000)

(16)

Learning Objective 5

Learning Objective 5

Define risk in auditing.

(17)

©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing,

©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e,Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasleyr Arens/Elder/Beasleyr 9 - 9 - 1717

Risk

Risk

Auditors accept some level of risk in performing the audit.

An effective auditor recognizes that risks exist, are difficult to measure,

and require careful thought to respond.

(18)

Risk and Evidence

Risk and Evidence

Auditors gain an understanding of the client’s business and industry and

assess client business risk.

Auditors use the audit risk model to further identify the potential for misstatements

(19)

©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing,

©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e,Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasleyr Arens/Elder/Beasleyr 9 - 9 - 1919

Illustration of Differing Evidence

Illustration of Differing Evidence

Among Cycles

A Medium High Low

Control risk

B Medium Low Low

Acceptable audit risk

C Low Low Low

Planned

detection risk

(20)

Illustration of Differing Evidence

Illustration of Differing Evidence

Among Cycles

B High Medium

Acceptable audit risk

(21)

©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing,

©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e,Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasleyr Arens/Elder/Beasleyr 9 - 9 - 2121

Learning Objective 6

Learning Objective 6

Describe the audit risk model

Describe the audit risk model

and its components.

(22)

Audit Risk Model for Planning

Audit Risk Model for Planning

PDR = AAR ÷ (IR × CR)

PDR = Planned detection risk

AAR = Acceptable audit risk

IR = Inherent risk

(23)

©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing,

©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e,Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasleyr Arens/Elder/Beasleyr 9 - 9 - 2323

Learning Objective 7

Learning Objective 7

Consider the impact of

Consider the impact of

engagement risk on

engagement risk on

acceptable audit risk.

(24)

Impact of Engagement Risk on

Impact of Engagement Risk on

Acceptable Audit Risk

Acceptable Audit Risk

Auditors decide engagement risk and use that risk to modify acceptable audit risk.

(25)

©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing,

©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e,Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasleyr Arens/Elder/Beasleyr 9 - 9 - 2525

Factors Affecting Acceptable

Factors Affecting Acceptable

Audit Risk

Audit Risk

The degree to which external users

rely on the statements

The likelihood that a client will have

financial difficulties after the audit report is issued

The auditor’s evaluation of

(26)

Methods Practitioners Use to

Methods Practitioners Use to

Assess Acceptable Audit Risk

Assess Acceptable Audit Risk

Methods Used to Assess Acceptable Audit Risk

External users’ reliance on

financial

statements

 Examine financial statements  Read minutes of the board

 Examine form 10K

 Discuss financing plans

(27)

©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing,

©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e,Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasleyr Arens/Elder/Beasleyr 9 - 9 - 2727

Methods Practitioners Use to

Methods Practitioners Use to

Assess Acceptable Audit Risk

Assess Acceptable Audit Risk

Likelihood of financial difficulties

 Analyze financial statements

for difficulties using ratios

 Examine inflows and outflows

of cash flow statements

Management integrity

 See Chapter 8 for client

acceptance and continuance Methods Used to Assess

(28)

Learning Objective 8

Learning Objective 8

Consider the impact of several

Consider the impact of several

factors on the assessment

factors on the assessment

of inherent risk.

(29)

©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing,

©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e,Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasleyr Arens/Elder/Beasleyr 9 - 9 - 2929

Factors Affecting Inherent Risk

Factors Affecting Inherent Risk

 Nature of the client’s business  Results of previous audits

 Initial versus repeat engagement  Related parties

 Nonroutine transactions

 Judgment required to correctly record

account balances and transactions

 Makeup of the population

(30)

Learning Objective 9

Learning Objective 9

Discuss the relationship of

Discuss the relationship of

risks to audit evidence.

(31)

©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing,

©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e,Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasleyr Arens/Elder/Beasleyr 9 - 9 - 3131

Relationship of Factors Influencing

Relationship of Factors Influencing

Risks to Risks and Risks to Planned

Risks to Risks and Risks to Planned

Evidence

Evidence

D = Direct relationship; I = Inverse relationship

Factors influencing

risks

Acceptable audit risk

(32)

Relationship of Factors Influencing

Relationship of Factors Influencing

Risks to Risks and Risks to Planned

Risks to Risks and Risks to Planned

Evidence

Evidence

The engagement may require

more experienced staff

The engagement will be reviewed

more carefully than usual

Auditors can change the audit

(33)

©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing,

©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e,Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasleyr Arens/Elder/Beasleyr 9 - 9 - 3333

Audit Risk for Segments

Audit Risk for Segments

Both control risk and inherent risk are

Both control risk and inherent risk are

typically set for each cycle, each

typically set for each cycle, each

account, and often even each audit

account, and often even each audit

objective, not for the overall audit.

(34)

Tolerable Misstatement, Risks,

Tolerable Misstatement, Risks,

and Balance-related Audit Objectives

and Balance-related Audit Objectives

It is common to assess inherent and control

risk for each balance-related audit objective

It is not common to allocate materiality

(35)

©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing,

©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e,Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasleyr Arens/Elder/Beasleyr 9 - 9 - 3535

Measurement Limitations

Measurement Limitations

(36)

Relationships of Risk to

Relationships of Risk to

Evidence

Evidence

Acceptable

audit risk Inherentrisk Controlrisk

(37)

©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing,

©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e,Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasleyr Arens/Elder/Beasleyr 9 - 9 - 3737

Tests of Details of Balances

Tests of Details of Balances

Evidence Planning Worksheet

Evidence Planning Worksheet

Auditors develop various types of worksheets to aid in relating the considerations affecting audit evidence to the appropriate

(38)

Learning Objective 10

Learning Objective 10

Discuss how materiality and risk

Discuss how materiality and risk

are related and integrated into

are related and integrated into

the audit process.

(39)

©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing,

©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e,Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasleyr Arens/Elder/Beasleyr 9 - 9 - 3939

Relationship of Tolerable

Relationship of Tolerable

Misstatement and Risks to

Misstatement and Risks to

Planned Evidence

Planned Evidence

D = Direct relationship; I = Inverse relationship

Acceptable

(40)

Revising Risks and Evidence

Revising Risks and Evidence

The auditor must revise the original assessment of the appropriate risk.

The auditor should consider the effect

(41)

©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing,

©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e,Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley Arens/Elder/Beasley 9 - 41

End of Chapter 9

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder 14 - 6 Sales Transaction Accounts Sales Accounts receivable Business Functions Processing customer

©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e, Auditing 13/e, Arens//Elder/Beasley Arens//Elder/Beasley 20 - 20 - 27 27 Tests of Details of Balances. Tests of Details

©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing and Assurance Services 9/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 2 - 3.. Certified Public

©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing and Assurance Services 9/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 4 - 3.. What

©2002 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Introduction to Management Accounting 12/e, Horngren/Sundem/Stratton 6 - 2.. Learning

Arens and Loebbecke. Auditing Pendekatan Terpadu, Salemba Empat, Jakarta. Basic Statistic For Social Research. New York: Mac Millan Publishing Co. Pengaruh Pemeriksaan

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Arens/Beasley/Elder 1 - 1 - 2 2..

Elder, 2008, Auditing and Assurance Services: An Integrated Approach, 1.3th Edition, Pearson Prentice Hall Amin Widjaja Tunggal, 2012, Audit Kecurangan dan Akuntansi Forensik,