©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing,
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e,Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley Arens/Elder/Beasley 9 - 1
Materiality and Risk
Materiality and Risk
Chapter 9
Learning Objective 1
Learning Objective 1
Apply the concept of materiality
Apply the concept of materiality
to the audit.
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing,
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e,Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasleyr Arens/Elder/Beasleyr 9 - 9 - 33
Materiality
Materiality
Materiality
Materiality
The auditor’s responsibility is to determine whether financial statements are
materially misstated.
If there is a material misstatement, the auditor will bring it to the client’s
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing,
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e,Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasleyr Arens/Elder/Beasleyr 9 - 9 - 55
Steps in Applying Materiality
Steps in Applying Materiality
Planning extent of tests Step
1
Steps in Applying Materiality
Steps in Applying Materiality
Evaluating results
Step 3
Estimate total
misstatement in segment
Step 4
Estimate the
combined misstatement
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing,
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e,Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasleyr Arens/Elder/Beasleyr 9 - 9 - 77
Learning Objective 2
Learning Objective 2
Make a preliminary judgment
Make a preliminary judgment
about what amounts to
about what amounts to
consider material.
Set Preliminary Judgment About
Set Preliminary Judgment About
Materiality
Materiality
This preliminary judgment is the maximum amount by which the auditor believes the statements could be misstated and still not
Auditors decide early in the audit
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing,
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e,Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasleyr Arens/Elder/Beasleyr 9 - 9 - 99
Factors Affecting Judgment
Factors Affecting Judgment
Materiality is a relative rather than an absolute concept.
Bases are needed for evaluating materiality.
Guidelines
Guidelines
Accounting and auditing standards do not provide specific materiality guidelines to practitioners.
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing,
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e,Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasleyr Arens/Elder/Beasleyr 9 - 9 - 1111
Learning Objective 3
Learning Objective 3
Allocate preliminary materiality
Allocate preliminary materiality
to segments of the audit
to segments of the audit
during planning.
Allocate Preliminary Judgment
Allocate Preliminary Judgment
About Materiality to Segments
About Materiality to Segments
This is necessary because evidence is accumulated by segments rather than for the financial statements as a whole.
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing,
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e,Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasleyr Arens/Elder/Beasleyr 9 - 9 - 1313
Learning Objective 4
Learning Objective 4
Use materiality to evaluate
Use materiality to evaluate
audit findings.
Estimated Total Misstatement
Estimated Total Misstatement
and Preliminary Judgment
and Preliminary Judgment
Cash
Accounts receivable Inventory
Total estimated
misstatement amount Preliminary judgment
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing,
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e,Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasleyr Arens/Elder/Beasleyr 9 - 9 - 1515
Estimated Total Misstatement
Estimated Total Misstatement
and Preliminary Judgment
and Preliminary Judgment
Net misstatements in the sample ($3,500)
× Total recorded population value ($450,000) ÷ Total sampled ($50,000)
Learning Objective 5
Learning Objective 5
Define risk in auditing.
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing,
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e,Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasleyr Arens/Elder/Beasleyr 9 - 9 - 1717
Risk
Risk
Auditors accept some level of risk in performing the audit.
An effective auditor recognizes that risks exist, are difficult to measure,
and require careful thought to respond.
Risk and Evidence
Risk and Evidence
Auditors gain an understanding of the client’s business and industry and
assess client business risk.
Auditors use the audit risk model to further identify the potential for misstatements
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing,
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e,Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasleyr Arens/Elder/Beasleyr 9 - 9 - 1919
Illustration of Differing Evidence
Illustration of Differing Evidence
Among Cycles
A Medium High Low
Control risk
B Medium Low Low
Acceptable audit risk
C Low Low Low
Planned
detection risk
Illustration of Differing Evidence
Illustration of Differing Evidence
Among Cycles
B High Medium
Acceptable audit risk
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing,
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e,Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasleyr Arens/Elder/Beasleyr 9 - 9 - 2121
Learning Objective 6
Learning Objective 6
Describe the audit risk model
Describe the audit risk model
and its components.
Audit Risk Model for Planning
Audit Risk Model for Planning
PDR = AAR ÷ (IR × CR)
PDR = Planned detection risk
AAR = Acceptable audit risk
IR = Inherent risk
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing,
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e,Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasleyr Arens/Elder/Beasleyr 9 - 9 - 2323
Learning Objective 7
Learning Objective 7
Consider the impact of
Consider the impact of
engagement risk on
engagement risk on
acceptable audit risk.
Impact of Engagement Risk on
Impact of Engagement Risk on
Acceptable Audit Risk
Acceptable Audit Risk
Auditors decide engagement risk and use that risk to modify acceptable audit risk.
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing,
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e,Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasleyr Arens/Elder/Beasleyr 9 - 9 - 2525
Factors Affecting Acceptable
Factors Affecting Acceptable
Audit Risk
Audit Risk
The degree to which external users
rely on the statements
The likelihood that a client will have
financial difficulties after the audit report is issued
The auditor’s evaluation of
Methods Practitioners Use to
Methods Practitioners Use to
Assess Acceptable Audit Risk
Assess Acceptable Audit Risk
Methods Used to Assess Acceptable Audit Risk
External users’ reliance on
financial
statements
Examine financial statements Read minutes of the board
Examine form 10K
Discuss financing plans
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing,
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e,Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasleyr Arens/Elder/Beasleyr 9 - 9 - 2727
Methods Practitioners Use to
Methods Practitioners Use to
Assess Acceptable Audit Risk
Assess Acceptable Audit Risk
Likelihood of financial difficulties
Analyze financial statements
for difficulties using ratios
Examine inflows and outflows
of cash flow statements
Management integrity
See Chapter 8 for client
acceptance and continuance Methods Used to Assess
Learning Objective 8
Learning Objective 8
Consider the impact of several
Consider the impact of several
factors on the assessment
factors on the assessment
of inherent risk.
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing,
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e,Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasleyr Arens/Elder/Beasleyr 9 - 9 - 2929
Factors Affecting Inherent Risk
Factors Affecting Inherent Risk
Nature of the client’s business Results of previous audits
Initial versus repeat engagement Related parties
Nonroutine transactions
Judgment required to correctly record
account balances and transactions
Makeup of the population
Learning Objective 9
Learning Objective 9
Discuss the relationship of
Discuss the relationship of
risks to audit evidence.
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing,
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e,Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasleyr Arens/Elder/Beasleyr 9 - 9 - 3131
Relationship of Factors Influencing
Relationship of Factors Influencing
Risks to Risks and Risks to Planned
Risks to Risks and Risks to Planned
Evidence
Evidence
D = Direct relationship; I = Inverse relationship
Factors influencing
risks
Acceptable audit risk
Relationship of Factors Influencing
Relationship of Factors Influencing
Risks to Risks and Risks to Planned
Risks to Risks and Risks to Planned
Evidence
Evidence
The engagement may require
more experienced staff
The engagement will be reviewed
more carefully than usual
Auditors can change the audit
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing,
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e,Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasleyr Arens/Elder/Beasleyr 9 - 9 - 3333
Audit Risk for Segments
Audit Risk for Segments
Both control risk and inherent risk are
Both control risk and inherent risk are
typically set for each cycle, each
typically set for each cycle, each
account, and often even each audit
account, and often even each audit
objective, not for the overall audit.
Tolerable Misstatement, Risks,
Tolerable Misstatement, Risks,
and Balance-related Audit Objectives
and Balance-related Audit Objectives
It is common to assess inherent and control
risk for each balance-related audit objective
It is not common to allocate materiality
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing,
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e,Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasleyr Arens/Elder/Beasleyr 9 - 9 - 3535
Measurement Limitations
Measurement Limitations
Relationships of Risk to
Relationships of Risk to
Evidence
Evidence
Acceptable
audit risk Inherentrisk Controlrisk
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing,
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e,Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasleyr Arens/Elder/Beasleyr 9 - 9 - 3737
Tests of Details of Balances
Tests of Details of Balances
Evidence Planning Worksheet
Evidence Planning Worksheet
Auditors develop various types of worksheets to aid in relating the considerations affecting audit evidence to the appropriate
Learning Objective 10
Learning Objective 10
Discuss how materiality and risk
Discuss how materiality and risk
are related and integrated into
are related and integrated into
the audit process.
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing,
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e,Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasleyr Arens/Elder/Beasleyr 9 - 9 - 3939
Relationship of Tolerable
Relationship of Tolerable
Misstatement and Risks to
Misstatement and Risks to
Planned Evidence
Planned Evidence
D = Direct relationship; I = Inverse relationship
Acceptable
Revising Risks and Evidence
Revising Risks and Evidence
The auditor must revise the original assessment of the appropriate risk.
The auditor should consider the effect
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing,
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e,Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley Arens/Elder/Beasley 9 - 41