THE ANALYSIS CHARACTERS AND CONFLICT IN THE MOVIE “THE HANGOVER III”
I Gusti Ngurah Gita Pramana Putra
1218351008
ENGLISH DEPARTMENT NON REGULER FACULTY OF ARTS UDAYANA UNIVERSITY
ABSTRACT
The title of this paper is Analysis of Categories and Function of Character The Movie Hangover part III. This study is focused in categorized of the characters and conflicts that found in main character. The theories applied were theory of characters by Wellek and Warren (1955) and theory of conflicts by Deetz and Stevenson (1986). The data of this study was taken from a movie entitled The Hangover part three. The data was collected through observation method and using documentation technique. It was done by watching the movie and reading the movie script. The following step was taking a note of parts of movie which related to the study, and then the data was categorized based on the theories.
The analysis comes to a conclusion. The characters in this movie were categorized as follows: Alan (dynamic protagonist character), Chow (static antagonist character). Secondary character are Phil (static protagonist character), Stu (static protagonist character), and Marshall (static antagonist character). Supporting character is Doug (static protagonist character). The internal and external conflict for the main character Alan were about his struggle to return himself to be normal person because Alan in the beginning had some kind of mental illness. Finally Alan can become a normal person in the end of this movie.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Praise God, I would like to thank Ida Sang Hyang Widhi Wasa, the almighty
God, for His precious blessing and miracles, I could finished my study extraordinarily.
There are a lot people who have contributed much along the entire process of
writing up of this work. For this I would like to express my sincere thanks and gratitude
to:
Drs. I Gede Putu Sudana, M.A. and Sang Ayu Isnu Maharani, S.S., M.Hum,
my first and second supervisors respectively who have imparted valuable input, ideas
and insight for the completion of this work. Their constant encouragement and
motivations have made me feel more motivated to finalize my work.
I would like also to express my sincere gratitude to the Dean Faculty of Letters
and Culture, Prof. Dr. Ni Luh Sutjiati Beratha, M.A. and , as the Head of Non-Regular
Program in English Department, for their hospitality and cooperation.
My deepest and heartfelt thanks should be addressed to all lecturers of the
English Department for the generous and precious knowledge imparted to me
throughout my years of study at the department. Their excellent academic expertise has
contributed much upon the completion of my work.
I also would like to thank all the precious people in my life, my beloved parents:
I Gst Ngr Ketut Aryana Darma Putra (alm), Ni Kt Sudarmi, my one and only sister Ni
Sayu Putu Trisna Dewi, A.Md for their never ending loves, spiritual supports, prayers,
to my closest friends Cahya Mulyawan, Ivan Bahtera, Arie Angga Sinaba, and David
Aprison for never tired to be friends with me.
Also thanks to my mates at campus Angelika AM, Indri NS, Adi Jaya Kusuma,
Rahardian, Dian Astawa, Anom PM, Koming, Krishna Arya, Nudhi Angga, Andre
Oktovan and also the full squads of #NFSL for always support me and being the
reasons for me to attend every classes in campus.
I hope this paper can give contribution to those who wish to study the beauty
behind the literary artworks. However, I realize that this paper is far from being perfect,
any useful suggestions from the readers are highly appreciated.
Denpasar, May 2016
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ... i
ABSTRACT ... iii
TABLE OF CONTENT ... iv
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION ... 1
1.1 Background of the Study ... 1
1.2 Problems of the Study ... 2
1.3 Aims of Study ... 2
1.4 Scope of Discussion ... 3
1.5 Research Method ... 3
1.5.1 Data Source ... 3
1.5.2 Method and Technique of Collecting Data ... 4
1.5.3 Method and Technique of Analyzing Data ... 5
CHAPTER II REVIEW OF LITERATURE, CONCEPTS, AND THEORITICAL FRAMEWORK ... 6
2.1 Review of Literature ... 6
2.2 Concepts ... 9
2.2.1 Concept of Literature ... 9
2.2.2 Concept of Character ... 10
2.3. Theoretical Framework ... 13
2.3.1 Theory of Character ... 13
2.3.2 The Understanding of Conflict... 15
2.3.2.1 Types of Conflict... 16
2.3.2.2 Conflict Process ... 18
2.3.2.3 Source of Conflict ... 20
2.3.2.4 Conflict Management Strategies ... 21
CHAPTER III THE ANALYSIS OF CHARACTER AND CONFLICT IN “THE HANGOVERT III” MOVIE ... 25
3.1 Overview ... 25
3.2 Synopsis ... 26
3.3 Analysis of Characters ... 29
3.3.1 The Analysis Categorization and Function of ‘Alan’ ... 29
3.3.2 The Analysis Categorization and Function of ‘Phil’ ... 39
3.3.3 The Analysis Categorization and Function of ‘Stu’ ... 45
3.3.4 The Analysis Categorization and Function of ‘Doug’ ... 50
3.3.5 The Analysis Categorization and Function of ‘Chow’ ... 53
3.3.6 The Analysis Categorization and Function of ‘Marshall’ ... 56
3.4 Analysis of Conflict ... 61
3.4.1 External Conflict ... 60
CHAPTER IV ... 66
CONCLUSION ... 66