N
E
M
P
O
L
E
V
E
D
Y
T
I
L
A
N
O
S
R
E
P
S
’
N
A
W
S
A
L
L
E
B
T
F
O
T
L
U
S
E
R
A
S
A
J
A
C
O
B
B
L
A
C
K
’
S
I
N
F
L
U
E
N
C
E
S
’
R
E
Y
E
M
E
I
N
E
H
P
E
T
S
N
I
N
E
W
M
O
O
N
A SARJANAPENDIDIKANTHESIS s t n e m e ri u q e R f o t n e m ll if l u F l a it r a P s a d e t n e s e r P
e h t n i a t b O o
t SarjanaPendidikanDegree h
s il g n E n
i LanguageEducaiton
y B
Paschaila Yovtia .A d
u t
S en tNumbe:r 051214140
L H S I L G N
E ANGUAGEEDUCATIONSTUDYPROGRAM T
N E M T R A P E
D OFLANGUAGEANDARTSEDUCATION N O I T A C U D E D N A G N I N I A R T S R E H C A E T F O Y T L U C A F
Y T I S R E V I N U A M R A H D A T A N A S
A T R A K A Y G O Y
i
N
E
M
P
O
L
E
V
E
D
Y
T
I
L
A
N
O
S
R
E
P
S
’
N
A
W
S
A
L
L
E
B
T
F
O
T
L
U
S
E
R
A
S
A
J
A
C
O
B
B
L
A
C
K
’
S
I
N
F
L
U
E
N
C
E
S
’
R
E
Y
E
M
E
I
N
E
H
P
E
T
S
N
I
N
E
W
M
O
O
N
A SARJANAPENDIDIKANTHESIS s
a d e t n e s e r
P Parita lFulifllmen to fRequriements e
h t n i a t b O o
t SarjanaPendidikanDegree h
s il g n E n
i LanguageEducaiton
y B
Paschaila Yovtia .A d
u t
S en tNumbe:r 051214140
L H S I L G N
E ANGUAGEEDUCATIONSTUDYPROGRAM T
N E M T R A P E
D OFLANGUAGEANDARTSEDUCATION N O I T A C U D E D N A G N I N I A R T S R E H C A E T F O Y T L U C A F
Y T I S R E V I N U A M R A H D A T A N A S
A T R A K A Y G O Y
v i
“Ont heotherhand ,youmus talway sbecarefu lnevert oallowdoubtt o t o n e r ' u o y f i n e v e , e k a t o t d e e n u o y s n o i si c e d e h t e k a t s y a w l A . u o y e z y l a r a p
e h t g n i o d e r ' u o y e r u
s rightt hing .Youl' lnevergowrong,i fwhenyoumakea e h t n i s i li v e D e h T " . . b r e v o r p n a m r e G d l o n a d n i m n i p e e k u o y , n o i s i c e d
g n o r w a n r u t o t e l b a e b s y a w l a l l' u o y d n a b r e v o r p t a h t r e b m e m e R . " li a t e d
e n o t h g i r a o t n i n o i s i c e
d . ”
(Brida ,PauloCuelho)
d n a r a e l c d n i m r u o y p e e K . e m o t n e t s i L
“ tha ’t sti .Youwli lhavepeaceo f r
a e d y M . d n i
m , don’ tworry .Learnt oaccept uy ro s ” el.f (Anothe rEarth)
o t d e t a c i d e d s i s i s e h t s i h
v
Y T I L A N I G I R O S ’ K R O W F O T N E M E T A T S
y lt s e n o h
I declaret hatt hist hesis ,which Ihavew irtten ,doe sno tcontain t hework f
o s tr a p r
o thework o fothe rpeople ,except t hosectied i n t hequotaiton sand t he i
c s a s a , s e c n e r e f e
r en itifcpapers hould.
a tr a k a y g o
Y ,26Mare t2012 r
e ti r W e h T
a ti v o Y a il a h c s a
P .A
i v
N A U J U T E S R E P N A A T A Y N R E P R A B M E L
S I M E D A K A N A G N I T N E P E K K U T N U H A I M L I A Y R A K I S A K I L B U P
a w s i s a h a m a y a s ,i n i h a w a b i d n a g n a t a d n a tr e b g n a
Y Universtia sSanataDharma:
a m a
N :PaschailaYovtiaA. a
w s i s a h a M r o m o
N :051214140
n a a k a t s u p r e P a d a p e k n a k ir e b m e m a y a s , n a u h a t e g n e p u m li n a g n a b m e g n e p i m e D
a m r a h D a t a n a S s a ti s r e v i n
U karya limiahs ayayangbejrudu :l
N E M P O L E V E D Y T I L A N O S R E P S ’ N A W S A L L E
B T
F O T L U S E R A S
A JACOBBLACK’ SINFLUENCE S
’ R E Y E M E I N E H P E T S N
I NEWMOON
k a h a m r a h D a t a n a S n a a k a t s u p r e P a d a p e k n a k ir e b m e m a y a s n a i k i m e d n a g n e D
n a k h il a g n e m , n a p m i y n e m k u t n
u dalam bentuk media lain, mengelolanya dalam a
y n n a k i s u b ir t s i d n e m , a t a d n a l a k g n a p k u t n e
b secara terbatas , dan
a y n n a k i s a k il b u p m e
m d I i nterne tatau media lain untuk kepen itngan akademi s n
ij i a t n i m e m u lr e p a p n a
t d air saya maupun membeirkan royatl ikepada saya .s
il u n e p i a g a b e s a y a s a m a n n a k m u t n a c n e m p a t e t a m a l e s
i n i n a a t a y n r e p n a i k i m e
D yangsayabua tdengans ebenarnya.
, a tr a k a y g o Y i d t a u b i D
: l a g g n a t a d a
P 26Mare t2012 ,
n a k a t a y n e m g n a Y
). A a ti v o Y a il a h c s a P
ii v T C A R T S B A 2 1 0 2 . a il a h c s a P , a ti v o
Y . Bella Swan’ sPersonaltiy Developmen ta sa Resul to f s ’ r e y e M e i n e h p e t S n i e c n e u lf n I s ’ k c a l B b o c a
J NewMoon .Yogyakatra :Engilsh
n o it a c u d
E Study Program, Depatrment fo Language da n A trs Educaiton, Facu tly f
o TeachersTrainingandEducaiton ,SanataDharmaUniverstiy. s e s s u c s i d y d u t s s i h
T oneofStephenieMeyers ’work sen itlted NewMoon . The nove l tell sabout Bella Swan who expeirence s personaltiy development
s ’ k c a l B b o c a J f o e s u a c e
b in lfuence on her .Thi snove li sinteresitng to discus s t i e s u a c e
b porrtays Bella Swan s’ personaltiy development a sa resul to fthe k c a l B b o c a J , d n e ir f t s e b r e h f o e c n e u lf n i . e h
T ma i oft hiss tudyist oanswert het woproblemsf ormulatedasf ollows : 1 )HowareBellaand Jacob descirbed i nStephenieMeyer’ sNewMoon? )2 How
y ti l a n o s r e p s ’ a ll e B s e o
d developa sar esul to fJacob’si n lfuence? s w e i v e r y r a r e ti l e m o s , m e l b o r p t s ri f e h t e v l o s o
T concerning thet heory o f
n o it a z ir e t c a r a h c f o y r o e h t d n a r e t c a r a h
c by Murphy arepresented to revealBella n
a w
S ’ s and Jacob Black’s characteirzaitons. To solve the second problem , s ’ k c o lr u
H theory o fpersonaltiy development i sused to analyze Bella Swan’ s y b d e c n e u lf n i s i t a h t t n e m p o l e v e d y ti l a n o s r e
p Jacob Black . There are three
. y ti l a n o s r e p n i s e g n a h c f o s e ir o g e t a
c They are bette rversu sworse ,quanttiaitve .s e g n a h c d i p a r s u s r e v w o l s d n a , e v it a ti l a u q s u s r e
v There are three catego ire so f
e g n a h c y ti l a n o s r e p r o f e l b i s n o p s e r s n o it i d n o
c in t hi snovel .They are changes i n s e r u s s e r p l a i c o s n i s e g n a h c , t n e m n o ri v n
e ,andchangesi n signiifcan tpeople. Thi s h c a o r p p a l a c i g o l o h c y s p s e s u o s l a y d u t
s because the focu s o f thi s study i s .s t c e p s a l a c i g o l o h c y s p s ’ n a w S a ll e B g n i z y l a n a e h
T resu tl so fthe study show tha tBella Swan’ spersonaltiy develop s k c a l B b o c a J f o e s u a c e
b ’ sgood in lfuence on her. The o irgina lpersonaltiy rtati s e
k
il cairng , independent ,hard working ,stubborn ,and dishonest change into t
s e n o
h and open-minded .BellaSwan’ schanges suti t o t het heory o fpersonaltiy h c i h w t n e m p o l e v e
d a rechangesi n envrionment ,changes i n socia lpressure ,and e l p o e p t n a c if i n g i s n i s e g n a h
c . Thechangesi nBella’ spersonaltiyarethechange s .r e tt e b e h t r o
f He ro irgina lpersonaltiy rtatii sr eplacedbyanothe r rtati .Shes lowly t s e n o h e b o t s n r a e
l and open-minded toward s othe r people . These change s . s e g n a h c w o l s d n a e v it a ti l a u q o t g n o l e b y lt n e u q e s n o
c Al lo fthese personaltiy
f o e c n e ir e p x e e h t y b d e c n e u lf n i e r a s e g n a h
c havingr elaitonshipwtihJ acob. e r a e r e h t , y d u t s s i h t f o t r a p t s a l e h t n
I twos uggesitons .Thef rists uggesiton n o ) s ( r e h c r a e s e r e r u t u f r o f s
i New Moon .Future researcher smay analyze the l e r d n a e v o l f o g n i n a e
m aitonship perceived by the main character ,Bella Swan . r e h t O . l e v o n e h t s a e m a s e h t d e lt it n e e i v o m a o t n i t u p n e e b s a h l e v o n e h T ; e i v o m e h t e z y l a n a n a c s r e h c r a e s e
r doesi thelp readerst o ge t rtuedesc irpiton fo e k a m e i v o m e h t r o l e v o n e h
t reader sconfused .Thesecond suggesiton i sfort he f o n o it a t n e m e l p m
i NewMoon int eaching Engilsh ,especially BasicReading .I In , I g n i d a e R c i s a
B the student swli lpracitce how t a po p yl th e re da ing str ta egies whe n reading thet extf romNewMoon.
s d r o w y e
ii i v K A R T S B A . 2 1 0 2 . a il a h c s a P , a ti v o
Y Bella Swan’ sPersonaltiy Developmen ta sa Resul to f n o o M w e N s ’ r e y e M e i n e h p e t S n i e c n e u lf n I s ’ k c a l B b o c a
J .Yogyakatra :Fakutla s
a s a h a B n a k i d i d n e P i d u t S m a r g o r P , n a k i d i d n e P u m lI n a d n a u r u g e
K Ingg irs ,
a ti s r e v i n
U sSanataDharma.
g n a y r e y e M e i n e h p e t S a y r a k l e v o n u t a s h a l a s g n a t n e t s a h a b m e m i n i i d u t S l u d u jr e
b New Moon . Nove l in i mencertiakan Bella Swan yang mengalam i a i d a b ir p e k n a g n a b m e k r e
p nkarenapengaruhyangbaikdar iJacobBlack .Noveli n i n a k r a b m a g g n e m a n e r a k k ir a n e
m perubahan kep irbadian dar iBella Swan karena i
dpengaruh iolehsahabatnya,J acobBlack.
n a a y n a tr e p a u d b a w a j n e m k u t n u h a l a d a i n i i d u t s i r a d n a u j u
T sebaga i
t u k ir e
b : b1 ) agaimanakarakte rBelladan Jacob didesk irpsikan dalam novel New n
o o
M ? 2 )bagaimana kep irbadian Bellaberkembang setelah meneirma pengaruh i
r a
d Jacob?
a p a r e b e b , a m a tr e p g n a y h a l a s a m n a k h a c e m e m k u t n
U telaahr eferens iyang
d r e t k a r a k i r o e t n a g n e d n a ti a k r e
b an teor ikarakte irsas ioleh Murphy diajukan k
u t n
u menyingkap karakteirsas iBelladanJacobd inoveli n.i U kn tu memecahkan a u d e k g n a y h a l a s a
m ,teor iperkembangan kep irbadian oleh Hu lrock digunakan k
u t n
u menganailsa perubahan kep irbadian dar iBella Swan karena dipengaruh i h
e l
o Jacob Black .Perubahankep irbadiandigolongkan menjad i itgamacam ,yatiu n a h a b u r e
p menuju kebaikan melawan perubahan menuju keburukan, perubahan f it a ti t n a u
k melawan perubahan kualtiatfi , dan perubahan lamba t melawan .t a p e c n a h a b u r e
p Ada itgakondis iyang mempengaruh iperubahankep irbadian d i r e p u ti a y , i n i l e v o
n ubahan ilngkungan ,perubahan t ekanan sosial ,dan perubahan . n a t u n a p i d a j n e m g n a y g n a r o i r a
d Stud i in i juga menggunakan pendekatan i g o l o k i s p k e p s a g n a t n e t s a h a b m e m h a l a d a i n i n a it il e n e p s u k o f a n e r a k i g o l o k i s p ir a
d BellaSwan. li s a
H -hasi ldar itelaah peneilitan in imenunjukkan bahwa kep irbadian a
ll e
B Swan berkembang karena pengaruh yang baik dar i Jacob Black . i s a s ir e t k a r a
K dar iBella adalah perhaitan, mandiir ,bekejra keras ,kera skepala , r u j u j k a d it n a
d . aK rakteirsas iyang semula adalah kera skepala dan itdak juju r r u j u j i d a j n e m h a b u r e
b dan terbuka .Perubahan Bella Swan cocok dengan teor i a n e r a k g n a b m e k r e b a i d i tr e p e s n a i d a b ir p e k n a g n a b m e k r e
p perubahan tekanan
sosial ,perubahan ilngkungan ,dan perubahan dair orang yang menjad ipanutan. h a l a d a a ll e B n a i d a b ir p e k m a l a d n a h a b u r e
P perubahan untuk kebaikan .
. k i a b h i b e l g n a y n a i d a b ir p e k n a g n e d n a k it n a g i d k i a b g n a r u k g n a y a y n n a i d a b ir p e K n a l e
P -pelan dia belaja r menjad i orang yang juju r dan terbuka . Semua r
e
p kembangan kep irbadian in idipengaruh ioleh pengalaman bersahaba tdengan . b o c a J n a r a
S -sarandibeirkanpadaakhi rstudii ni .Saranuntukpenelti iNewMoon h a l a d a a y n t u j n a l e
s menganailsaatr idar icintadanpersahabatan bag itokohutama i
r a
d New Moon ,BellaSwan. Noveli n ipun sudahdibua tdalambentukf limyang i ti l e n e P . a y n l e v o n n a g n e d a m a s l u d u jr e
b New Moon selanjutnya dapa t pula
t u b e s r e t m li f h a k a p a ; t u b e s r e t m li f a s il a n a g n e
x i
e t m li f u a t a t u b e s r e t l e v o n i a n e g n e m r a n e b g n a y n a r a b m a
g rsebu t malah
. a c a b m e p n a k g n u g n i b m e
m Saran untuk penerapan pengajaran bahasa Ingg ir s n
a k a n u g g n e
m nove lNewMoon ,khususnyapengajaranmataku ilahBasicReading I ,adalah siswa dapa tbelraith menggunakan srtateg imembaca tek sbacaan dair
n o o M w e
N .
a t a
K Kunci: rPe kembanganKep irbadian ,Pengaruh ,NewMoon
x
S T N E M E G D E L W O N K C A
y lt s ri
F , Iwould ilket othankJesu sChristandMotherMaryfo rblessing .
s i s e h t s i h t h s i n if o t e
m Thei rblessing andguidancehavesrtengthened mei n my t
s e d r a
h d . ay , t x e
N I owe a grea t dea l to my sponsor , Henny Herawa it , S.Pd. , .
m u H .
M ,who had guided and suppo tred mein ifnishing t hist hesis . Iam deeply n
o it e l p m o c e h t g n ir u d e c i v d a d n a n o it s e g g u s t n a c if i n g i s r e h r o f l u f e t a r
g o fthi s
o t e k il o s l a d l u o w I . s i s e h
t thank al l PB Ilecturers who have shared thei r ,
y d u t s y m g n ir u d e g d e l w o n
k the staf fo fPB Isecretariat who have been very o
t t n e it a
p h elp me accompilsh my study ,and al lthe ilbrary sta ff o fSanata y
ti s r e v i n U a m r a h
D whoprovide mewtihgreats ervicesi n ifnishingt hist hesi .s o
g e d u ti t a r g t s e t a e r g y
M e sto my beloved parents ,Bapak Agusitnu s o
t o r u
S and Ibu MariaMarcelilna . Ihavel earned al ott he meaning o fsacirifce .
m e h t m o r
f It hankt hemt hatt heyarealway sbesidemewheneve r Ineedaplace o
t takea tr es andaplacet o warmmysefl .My specia lappreciaitoni sgivent omy ,
s r e t s i s d e v o l e
b Luciana Dw iSaftiri and Maria Excelsia Anindtia ,fo rthei r s
s y a w l a r o f m e h t k n a h t I . e r a c d n a n o it c e f f a e ti n if n
i upporitng me and never
. w o n o t p u n w o d e m g n it t e l
, t x e
N Iwould also ilke to thank my closes tf irend so fPB I2005 ,Nova , u
j a
T ,Oilve,f ort hesuppor tandasstiancedu irngmystudy .Myspecialt hanks og o
t “MtiraPUSD”f o rshairngt hei rknowledgeandbeautfiu lday swtih me ,giving s
i n if o t t n e m e g a r u o c n e e
i x k
n a h t l a i c e p s y
M s og to my beloved boyfirend ,Zico ,fo ralway sstaying .
d n u o r
a It hankhimf o rhiss uppo tr ,cheerfulnes ,sl oveandprayers . e
n o y r e v e k n a h t I , t s a e l t o n t u b t s a
L tha t Icould no tmeniton oneby one w hohadhelpedmei n ifnishingt histhesis .MayGodblesst hemal.l
ii x
TABLEOFCONTENTS
Page
E G A P E L T I
T ... i
E G A P L A V O R P P
A ... ii
E G A P N O I T A C I D E
D ... vi
Y T I L A N I G I R O S ’ K R O W F O T N E M E T A T
S ... v A
A T A Y N R E P R A B M E
L NPERSETUJUANPUBLIKASI ... iv
T C A R T S B
A ... iiv K
A R T S B
A ... .... vi ii
S T N E M E G D E L W O N K C
A ... x N
E T N O C F O E L B A
T T S ... ix i
S E C I D N E P P
A ... ix v
I R E T P A H
C INTRODUCTION
.
A Backgroundoft heStudy ... 1 .
B ProblemFormulaiton ... 4 .
C Objecitve soft heStudy ... 4 .
D Benefti soft heStudy ... 4 .
E De ifniitono fTerms ... 5
I I R E T P A H
C REVIEWOFRELATEDLITERATURE .
A Reviewo fRelatedTheo ires ... 7 .
1 PsychologicalApproach ... 7 .
2 Character ... 8 .
3 Characteirzaiton ... 01 .
4 PersonaltiyDevelopment ... 12 .
ii i x CHAPTERI II METHODOLOGY
.
A Objec toft heStudy ... 81 .
B Approachoft heStudy ... 91 .
C Methodoft heStudy ... 20
V I R E T P A H
C ANALYSIS
.
A T Dhe escirpitono fBellaSwanandJ acobBlack ... 22 .
1 BellaSwan ... 23 .
a PersonaltiyTrati s ... 32 )
1 Ca irng ... 32 )
2 Independen t... 52 )
3 HardWorking ... 62 )
4 Stubborn ... 72 )
5 Dishones t ... 03 .
b Socia lTrati s ... 13 .
2 JacobBlack ... 32 .
a PersonaltiyTrati s ... 33 )
1 EasyGoingandF irendly ... 33 )
2 K ind ... 43 )
3 Ca irng ... 53 .
b Socia lTrati s ... 63 .
B BellaSwan’ sPersonaltiyDevelopmen t e c n e u lf n I s ’ k c a l B b o c a J f o t l u s e R a s
a ... 37 .
1 Honest ... 38 .... .
v i x V
R E T P A H
C CONCLUSIONSANDSUGGESTIONS .
A C c uon l s ni s o ... 54 .
B Suggesitons ... 48 .
1 Suggesitonf o rFutureResearchers ... 94 .
2 Suggesitonf o rtheI mplementaitono fNewMoon I
g n i d a e R c i s a B g n i h c a e T n
i ... 9.. 4
S E C N E R E F E
R ... 51
S E C I D N E P P A
1 X I D N E P P
A Lesson nPla ... 54 X
I D N E P P
A 2 SampleMateirals rf o g
n i h c a e
T BasicReadingI ... 56 3
X I D N E P P
A Summaryo fStephenieMeyer’ sNewMoon ......................... 61 4
X I D N E P P
1
I R E T P A H C
N O I T C U D O R T N I
, y d u t s e h t f o d n u o r g k c a b y l e m a n , s tr a p e v if f o s t s i s n o c r e t p a h c s i h T
n o it i n if e d d n a , y d u t s e h t f o s ti f e n e b , y d u t s e h t f o s e v it c e j b o , n o it a l u m r o f m e l b o r p
s i h t f o c i p o t e h t t u o b a n o it a n a l p x e e h t s e v i g y d u t s e h t f o d n u o r g k c a B . s m r e t f o
a l u m r o f m e l b o r P . y d u t
s iton provide stwo quesiton stha tshould be analyzed in
e v it c e j b O . s i s e h t s i h
t soft hes tudys tatet hepurposeo fw iritngt hist hesis .Benefti s
n i a l p x e y d u t s e h t f
o thebenefti soft hist hesis .De ifniitonoft ermsi sabou tsome
u t s e h t o t d e t a l e r t a h t s m r e
t d y.
.
A Backgroundoft heStudy
Human beingwli lalway schange. Therei sasequenceo fchangefromt he
e fi l f o d o ir e p y lr a
e to the itme o f death. According to Lemme (1995) in
A d n a t n e m p o l e v e
D du tlhood ,developmen ti s“a systemaitc change sin behavio r l a n r e t n i e h t d n a l a u d i v i d n i e h t n e e w t e b n o it c a r e t n i m o r f t l u s e r e h t t a h t e m it r e v o
.) 8 . p ( ” t n e m n o ri v n e l a n r e t x e d n
a I tmeanst ha tasequenceo fchangei nhumanl fie
s
i called t hedevelopment .Pikunas( 1976 )alsostatesi nHumanDevelopment :An S
t n e g r e m
E cience ,“Beilef sand atttiudes ,emoitona lresponses ,and intellectua l s
e it il i b
a -indeed ,al lthe dimension so fpersonaltiy-change throughou tthe human
e fi
l -span”(p.4) .I tmeans t hat t hepersonaltiy also ha sasequenceo fchangei n a
e m it e fi
1 ( k c o lr u
H 953)i nDevelopmenta lPsychologystatest ha t“thehumanbeing g n i e b n a m u h t a h t s n a e m t I . ) 1 . p ( ” c it a t s r e v e n s
i alway s expe irence s the
s a h c u s s r o t c a f y n a m y b d e c n e u lf n i e r a s e g n a h c e s e h T . e g n a h c y ti l a n o s r e
p thei r
m e h t d n u o r a y t e i c o s e h t d n a s d e e
n whichalso changeallt he itme .Here ,aperson
n o s r e p e h t y a w e h t n o s d n e p e d d a b r o d o o g e b n a
c rteats the factor which
.r e h r o m i h s e c n e u lf n
i The personaltiy can change fo rthe bette ro rworst .A
n o s r e
p willf acet heproces so fdevelopmen to fhi so rherpersonaltiy fi heo rshe
h ti w s l a e
d the factor in a good way. Here ,Pikuna s(1976)says t hat, “Since t he
h g u o r h t g n i o g n i s n o i s i c e d d n a , s m e l b o r p , s e g n a h c t n a t s n o c y lr a e n s e c a f n o s r e p d n a w o n k r e tt e b o t ” , e s r e v i n u “ r e t u o d n a r e n n i s i h y d u t s e h t a h t l a i c u r c s i ti , e fi l . ) 4 . p ( ” fl e s m i h d n a t s r e d n u “ , t a h t s y a s ) 6 7 9 1 ( s a n u k i P , r e v o e r o
M Mos to fthe purely human power s
e l p o e p m o r f n o it a l u m it s n o d n e p e
d -from the mothe rin paritcular .Growth in
e h t n i s r e h t o y b y l n i a m d e n i m r e t e d s i y ti v it i s n e s l a r o m d n a , l a i c o s , l a n o it o m e ) 4 5 . p ( ” e fi l f o s r a e y y lr a
e .In othe rwords ,there are two factor stha tcause the
. s r o t c a f l a n r e t n i d n a l a n r e t x e y l e m a n , s p o l e v e d n o s r e p a f o c it s ir e t c a r a h
c The
e h t m o r f s a h c u s , fl e s m i h n o s r e p e h t f o e d i s n i m o r f d e v ir e d s i r o t c a f l a n r e t n i . n o s r e p e h t f o y g o l o h c y s p d n a e u q i s y h
p The age o fthe person can in lfuence
. s e v a h e b d n a s k n i h t n o s r e p a y a w e h t n i n e e s e b n a c t i d n a s e g n a h c r e t c a r a h c n i y a w e h t s e m o c e b y ti l a e r e h t g n i c a f n i n o s r e p a f o n o it i d n o c l a t n e m e h t ,s e d i s e B .r e t c a r a h c r e h r o s i h g n i p o l e v e
d Theexternalf actori sdeirvedf romoutsideoft he
y t e i c o s e h T . s e g n a h c s ’ r e t c a r a h c e h t e c n e u lf n i o s l a n a c n o it i d a rt d n a s ti b a h l a i c o S
s e k a t o s l
a patri nmakingt hechanges .
f o r o h t u a e h
T NewMoon ,Meyer ,alsosee ssomeonepersonaltiy develops f
o t l u s e r a s
a othe rpeoplein lfuence .Sheobviouslyt ell saboutt hechange soft he
r e t c a r a h c n i a
m becauseofl oveand f irendship .Sheshow sgradua lchange sin t he
. s p o l e v e d r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h t w o h s ll e t ti , d n e e h t t A . y r o t s
. n e ll u C d r a w d E , e ri p m a v a h ti w e v o l n i s ll a f o h w n a m u h a s i n a w S a ll e B
o T . r e g n a d n i r e h s t u p a ll e B h ti w p i h s n o it a l e r s i h t a h t s e z il a e r d r a w d E , r e v e w o H
a h t r e h s e c n i v n o c e h , a ll e B t c e t o r
p theno l ongerl ove she rand move saway wtih
a ll e B g n i v a e l , y li m a f s i
h whoi st henheatrbrokenanddepressedf o rmonth .s
r e h g n ir u d a ll e B s tr o f m o c b o c a J . d n e ir f t s e b s ’ a ll e B s i k c a l B b o c a J
r p e
d ession .Jacob help shert o becomehappy and norma lagain atlhoughshestli l
, r e v e w o H . r e h r o f s g n il e e f s i h t u o b a p u n e p o o t s tr a t s o s l a b o c a J . d r a w d E s e s s i m
a ll e
B i storn by he rown feeilng sto both Edward and Jacob .Later ,Jacob can
e s a h
p intoawerewol ftha tactuallyi st heenemyo fvamprie .
n i n o it a r o l p x e s ’ r e y e
M thi snoveli sveryi nteresitng. Loveand f irendship
a ll e B d e g n a h c s a
h whoi sthemaincharacterint hestory .Int hi sstudy, t hewrtie r
s e s u c o
f on Bella Swan’ spersonal tiy developm ent a sa resul to fJacob Black’ s
e c n e u lf n
.
B Problem sFormula iton
e z y l a n a l li w y d u t s s i h t , e v o b a d e s s u c s i d s i t a h t c i p o t e h t o t g n i n r e c n o C
.s w o ll o f s a d e t a l u m r o f e b n a c t a h t s m e l b o r p
.
1 HowareBellaandJ acobdescirbedi nStephenieMeyer’ sNewMoon? .
2 Howdoe sBella’ spersonaltiydevelopa sar esul to fJacob’ sin lfuence?
.
C Objecitve soft heStudy
. y l s u o i v e r p d e t a t s s n o it s e u q h c r a e s e r e h t r e w s n a o t s m i a y d u t s e h T
f o s n o it p ir c s e d e h t d n a t s r e d n u o t y lt s ri f e r a y d u t s e h t f o s e v it c e j b o e h t , e r o f e r e h T
e n i m a x e o t s i e v it c e j b o d n o c e s e h T . l e v o n e h t n i k c a l B b o c a J d n a n a w S a ll e B
m p o l e v e d y ti l a n o s r e p s ’ a ll e
B en ta sa resul to fJacob Black in lfuence a si ti s
.l e v o n e h t n i d e l a e v e r
.
D Benefti soft heStudy
r o f t if e n e b s r e f f o y d u t s s i h
T the readers ,the student so fthe Engilsh
m a r g o r P y d u t S n o it a c u d
E ,andt hef uturer esearchers .Frist ,thewrtie rexpectst ha t
thiss tudyi sbeneifcialt ot her eaders .Thewrtie rhopest hatt hiss tudygive sagrea t
e g d e l w o n
k from t hemaincharacter’ sexpeirencein t henovel .Ther eade rcan ge t
c a r a h c r o n i m t a h w t u o b a e g d e l w o n k e r o
m te ri sand ti sin lfuence toward sone’ s
. y ti l a n o s r e
p I ti salso expected tha treading thi sstudy can en irch readers ’ the
h g u o r h t e r u t a r e ti l f o k r o w a g n it e r p r e t n i n i ll i k s y r a r e ti
l analyzing thecharacter.s
k r o w s ’r e y e M e i n e h p e t S t u o b a e r o m d n a t s r e d n u l li w r e d a e r e h t , r e v o e r o M
d n o c e
S , of rthe students o fEngilsh Educaiton Study Program ,the study
e s u o s l a y a m y e h T . l e v o n s i h t g n i z y l a n a n i d e t s e r e t n i e r a o h w e s o h t e ri p s n i y a m
o s l a l e v o n s i h t ,s e u l a v f o t o l a g n i v i g s e d i s e B . g n i h c a e t r o f e c r u o s a s a l e v o n e h t
r i e h t h c ir n e t n e d u t s e h t s p l e
h vocabulary.Finally, t hewrtie rhopest hatt hi sstudy
s r e h c r a e s e r e r u t u f e h t o t e t u b ir t n o c l li
w whowli lstudyt hesamet opic .Thewrtie r
. m e h t r o f e g d e l w o n k g n it r o p p u s e b l li w y d u t s s i h t t a h t s e p o h
.
E De ifniitono fTerm s
s e it i u g i b m a d i o v a o
T and misunderstandingi nt hist hesi sandt o providea
, s i s y l a n a r a e l
c somet erm susedi nt hiss tudyarede ifnedasf ollow.
.
1 PersonaltiyDevelopment
t r o p ll
A says , the term ‘personaltiy ’ mean s“the dynamic organizaiton
n i h ti
w the individua l o f those psychophysica l system s tha t determine hi s
t h g u o h t d n a r o i v a h e b c it s ir e t c a r a h
c ”( a sctiedi nHu lrock ,1976 ,p.7) .Accordingt o
e m m e
L (1995) in Developmen tand Adutlhood ,developmen ti s“a systemaitc e w t e b n o it c a r e t n i m o r f t l u s e r e h t t a h t e m it r e v o r o i v a h e b n i s e g n a h
c en the
t n i e h t d n a l a u d i v i d n
i erna l and externa l envrionment” ( .p8) . I t mean s tha t
s i t n e m p o l e v e d y ti l a n o s r e
p thechanges i n behavio ra stheresutlf romi nteraciton
n e e w t e
b two o rmoreindividuals .Int hi sstudy,t hei nteracitonbetween Bellaand
.r o i v a h e b s ’ a ll e B n i s e g n a h c e m o s s e k a m b o c a
J Bella’ spersonaltiy develop sa s
.
2 In lfuence
o t g n i d r o c c
A Jame sDreve rin A Dicitonary o fPsychology ,the word s
i e c n e u lf n
i any pas to rpresen tcondiiton ,expeirenced a so ractually playing a
s ’ e n o g n i n i m r e t e d n i tr a
p behavior ,o rcourseoft hough,t i nt hepresent. I tmean s
t a h
t in lfuence i sa condiiton tha tactually playing a par tin determining the
r e t c a r a h
c ’ s behavior o rcourse o f though t in the present . In thi s study, the
b o c a J d n a a ll e B n e e w t e b n o it c a r e t n
7 I I R E T P A H C
E R U T A R E T I L D E T A L E R F O W E I V E R
r e t p a h c s i h
T d si cusse sal lreview o frelated ltierature used in thi sstudy .
e r a y e h
T thereview of r elated t heori esand t heoreitcalf ramework .The f ris tpa tr ,
e h
t review o frelated t heories ,suppo trst heanalysis .The second par,t t heoreitca l
m e l b o r p e h t e v l o s o t d e il p p a e r a d e w e i v e r s e ir o e h t e h t w o h s e b ir c s e d , k r o w e m a r f
. y d u t s e h t f o
.
A Reviewo fRelatedTheories
y r e v e r a t a h t e r u t a r e ti l o t d e t a l e r s e ir o e h t e m o s f o s t s i s n o c t r a p s i h T
p u s o t r e d r o n i t n a tr o p m
i po trt heanalysis i n t hi sstudy .They arepsychologica l
, h c a o r p p
a character ,characteirzaiton ,andpersonaltiydevelopmen.t
.
1 PsychologicalApproach
s d o o W d n a r e g r e b r h o
R (1971) ni Reading and Wriitng about Ltierature s
e h c a o r p p a f o s d n i k e v if n o it n e
m ( .p 6-15) . They are formails t approach ,
l a r u tl u c o i c o s , h c a o r p p a l a c i h p a r g o i
b -histo irca lapproach, mythopoeic approach ,
h c a o r p p a l a c i g o l o h c y s p d n
a .In thi sstudy ,the wrtie rused the psychologica l
z y l a n a e b n a c b o c a J d n a a ll e B f o s r e t c a r a h c e h t e s u a c e b h c a o r p p
a ed deeply
y d u t s s i h t e c n i s , y d u t s s i h t n i e l b a ti u s s i h c a o r p p a s i h T . h c a o r p p a s i h t h g u o r h t
. t n e m p o l e v e d y ti l a n o s r e p s ’ a ll e B n o b o c a J f o e c n e u lf n i e h t n o s e s u c o f
t a h t y g o l o h c y s p f o s t c e p s a y n a s e z i n g o c e r h c a o r p p a l a c i g o l o h c y s P
f o t n e m e l e n i a tr e c a e il r e d n
e h t n i a l p x e o t t n a e m s i y g o l o h c y s p f o y r o e h t , e s a c s i h t n I . y r o t s e h t n i r e t c a r a h c s ’ r e t c a r a h c h c a e t a h t a e d i e h t , m o r f s e m o c t i e r e h w , y ti l a n o s r e p s ’ r e t c a r a h c o h c y s p e h t o t d e r r e f e r e b d l u o c r o i v a h e
b logy o fhuman being .Thust hi sapproach
. t h g u o h t d n a r o i v a h e b s ’ r e t c a r a h c e h t d n a t s r e d n u o t d e s u e b n a c .
2 Character
s m a r b A . r e t c a r a h c s i r e d i s n o c t s u m r e ti r w e h t t a h t s t n e m e l e e h t f o e n O
(1981) in hi sbook A Glossary o fLtieraryTerm sdeifne scharacter a s“a l tierary ” n o s r e p f o e p y t e v it c n it s i d a f o e s o r p n i h c t e k s , y tt i w y ll a u s u , tr o h s a : e r n e g
( .p )2 . 0 Then healso deifne scharactera s“t heperson presented i n adramaitc o r
l a r o m h ti w d e w o d n e g n i e b s a s r e d a e r e h t y b d e t e r p r e t n i e r a o h w k r o w e v it a r r a n y a s y e h t t a h w n i d e s s e r p x e e r a t a h t s e it il a u q l a n o it i s o p s i d d n
a - thedialogue– and
o d y e h t t a h
w – theaciton” ( .p )20 .So ,characteri st he person i nanarraitvework
.s c it s ir e t c a r a h c r o s ti a rt s i h r o r e h d n a s d o o W d n a r e g r e b r h o
R (1971 )state“character shavean i mpo trantr olei n
n o e c n e ir e p x e e h t n i y l s u o ir a c i v e t a p i c it r a p o t s r e d a e r e h t p l e h y e h t e c n i s y r o t s a n i s r e t c a r a h c e h t f o s e it i v it c a e h t r o s g n il e e f e h t y l e v it a n i g a m i g n ir a h s y b y r o t s e h t ( ” y r o t s e h
t p.19.) I tmeanst hatt hecharacteri st hei mportantf eaturei n t henove l
.r e t c a r a h c a t u o h ti w s s e l h tr o w s i l e v o n a d n a e l k n e
H (1977 ) inReadingt heNovel :AnI ntroducitont ot heTechnique so f n o it c i F g n it e r p r e t n
I ,disitnguishe scharacterthe majo ro rmain characte rand t he r e t c a r a h c y r a d n o c e s r o r o n i
m ( .p 88 .) Accordingt oHenkle, t hemajorcharacters
r e t c a r a h c t n a tr o p m i t s o m e h t e r
. p
( 9 1) (by the autho ro rby the othe rcharacters) .These character s“deserve ou r
n o it n e tt a t s e ll u
f ” because they “perform a key srtuctura lfunciton : we bu lid
e u l a v r u o h s il b a t s e d n a s e ri s e d d n a n o it a t c e p x
e ” (p.9 2) upon t hem .Beside ,s t he
s r e t c a r a h c r o n i
m are the character stha tperform more ilmtied funcitons .They
e r
a “les ssophisitcated ,so thei rresponse sto expeirence are les sinteresitng”
. p ( 9 . 7)
y e v r a H , r e v o e r o
M (1965 )sayst hatt herearet hreecatego ire so fcharacter .
s i t s ri f e h
T protagonist character tha tundergoe sconfilcts l eading hi satttiude s
t c il f n o c s e c n e ir e p x e r e t c a r a h c e h t t a h t s n a e m t I . y r o t s e h t g n o l
a s from the
s i d n o c e s e h T . y r o t s e h t f o d n e e h t t a l it n u y r o t s e h t f o g n i n n i g e
b background
r e t c a r a h
c tha tcanappeari ndividuallyo rcollecitvely. I tmeanst hatt hecharacte r
. r e t c a r a h c t s i n o g a t o r p e h t r o f d n u o r g k c a b e h t e m o c e b o t y li r a s s e c e n t s u j s r a e p p a
Thet h rid i sintermediate ifgurecharactertha tappear sbetweent heprotagonis t
s e m o c e b s e m it e m o s r e t c a r a h c e h t t a h t s n a e m t I . s r e t c a r a h c d n u o r g k c a b d n a
n i t n a tr o p m i s s e l s e m o c e b e h s r o e h s e m it e m o s t u b , s tr a p n i a tr e c n i t n a tr o p m i
s tr a p r e h t
o ( .p 54 -4 7 .)
o h
T ma sR .Arp and GregJohnson(2009) in Ltierature :Structure ,Sound , e
s n e S d n
a classi ife scharacters i nto t wo t ypes .F ris,t t he lfat character tha tha s ” o w t r o e c n e t n e s a n i p u d e m m u s e b n a c “ d n a ” s ti a rt t n a n i m o d e r p o w t r o e n o “
) 3 6 1 . p
( .Anothert ypeoft hecharacteri st heroundcharacter ;characterst ha t“are
e e r h t e h t e v a h “ t a h t s r e t c a r a h C . ” d e d i s y n a m d n a x e l p m o
c -dimenitona lqualtiy o f
. p ( ” e l p o e p l a e
r 163) . There i s also a sta itc character .The staitc characte r
t y ll a it n e s s e s n i a m e r
” d n
e (p.164) . On the othe r hand , “the developing (o r dynamic ) character
g n i h t e m o s ( k o o lt u o r o , y ti l a n o s r e p , r e t c a r a h c f o e g n a h c t c n it s i d e m o s s e o g r e d n u
a c if i n g i
s n tandbasic)”( p.164 .)
.
3 Characteriza ito n
Kate Greenville (1990 )in he r book The Wriitng Book :A Workbook fo r s
r e ti r W n o it c i
F de ifne scharacteirzaiton a s“all t he t hing swrtier sdo t o bu lid up t
n a w y e h t s r e t c a r a h c e h
t ” (p.36) .She also states tha tcharacteirzaiton i s“ the
s s e c o r
p tha trtansformsr eal-lfiepeoplei ntocharactersi n ifciton”( p.36) .
n o s n h o J d n a p r A o t g n i d r o c c
A (2009) ,there are two p irnciple way san
. e z ir e t c a r a h c n a c r o h t u a
n I . y lt c e ri d n i r o y lt c e ri d r e h ti e s r e t c a r a h c r i e h t t n e s e r p s r o h t u
A direct
n o it a t n e s e r
p theyt ell su ssrtaigh tout ,byexposiiton o ranalysis ,whatt he e b ir c s e d y r o t s e h t n i r e t c a r a h c r e h t o n a e v a h y e h t r o , e k il e r a s r e t c a r a h c
n I . m e h
t indirec tpresenta itontheautho rshow sust hecharacterst hrough l
e r a y e h t t a h w e n i m r e t e d e w ; s n o it c a r i e h
t ike by wha tthey say o rdo
. p ( 162 .)
t c e ri d a e v i g t o n s e o d r o h t u a e h t d n a l e v o n a d a e r e w n e h w e m it e n O
t a h w e k il r e t c a r a h c f o s ti a rt e v i e c r e p n a c e w , r e t c a r a h c e h t t u o b a n o it p ir c s e d
y h p r u
M (1972 )says ,thereare“af ewoft hewaysi n whichan autho rattemptst o
” e v il a e m o c d n a , o t e l b a d n a t s r e d n u s r e t c a r a h c s i h e k a
m ( .p 11 - 36 17 ) .They are
, e fi l t s a p , h c e e p s , r e h t o n a y b n e e s s a r e t c a r a h c , n o it p ir c s e d y ti l a n o s r e p
m s ir e n n a m d n a t h g u o h t ,t n e m m o c t c e ri d , s n o it c a e r ,s r e h t o f o n o it a s r e v n o
.
a Persona ldescripiton
Theautho rcandescirbet hecharacters ’appearancedrieclty.I tmeanst ha twecan
w o n
k thedetali sont hecharacter’ sappearance ilkef ace,s kin ,hari ,andclothes.
.
b Characterass eenbyanother
Theautho ruse sanothe rcharacter’ sopinionst odescirbeacharacte .rI tmeanst ha t
r o s g n i y a s s ’ r e t c a r a h c r e h t o g n i d n a t s r e d n u y b r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h t w o n k n a c e w
.l e v o n a n i r e h r o m i h t u o b a s t h g u o h t
.
c Speech
, r e h t o n a h ti w n o it a s r e v n o c n i s i e h r e v e n e h w , s k a e p s n o s r e p a a r e v e n e h W
e h r e v e n e h
w put sforward an opinion ,the autho rgive su ssome clue to hi s
. r e t c a r a h
c I tmeanst ha twha tacharacters ay scangivet her eaders omecluest ohi s
.r e t c a r a h c r e h r o
.
d Pastl fie
The autho rgive sa clue to characters’ pas tevent stha thelp the reade rto have
e w , s e v il t s a p s ’ r e t c a r a h c a g n i w o n k y b t a h t r a e l c s i tI . r e t c a r a h c s i h t u o b a e r u t c i p
. e fi l e r u t u f s i h r o r e h t c e f f a n e tf o s e v il t s a p n i d i d r e t c a r a h c e h t t a h w e t a l e r n a c
.
e Conversa itono fothers
Theconversaiton o fothe rpeopleandt het hingst heysay abou tacharacte rcanbe
.s c it s ir e t c a r a h c s ’ n o s r e p e h t o t e u l c
a I tmean swhen people talk abou tothe r
, e l p o e
.f Reaciton
Theautho rhelpst her eaderst or ecognizeaperson’ scharacte rby descirbing how
s t n e v e d n a n o it a u ti s s u o ir a v o t s t c a e r n o s r e p t a h
t . E yv er characte rha sdfiferen t
h ti w g n il a e d n i y a
w vairouss tiuaitonandevents.
.
g Direc tcomment
Theautho rgive sacommen ton a person’ scharacte irsitc sd rieclty. I tmeans t ha t
e v i g y lt i c il p x e n a c r o h t u a e h
t hi sopinionaboutt hecharacteri nt hes tory.
.
h Thought
Theautho rcan givehi sreader sadriec tknowledgeo fwha taperson i st hinking
.t u o b
a I tmean stha tthe reade rha sa secre tlistening device plugged in to the
.l e v o n e h t n i n o s r e p a f o s t h g u o h t t s o m n i
.i Mannerism
The autho rcan tel lhi sreader sabou tthe character’ scharacteirsitc sfrom the
.s e i s a r c n y s o i d i d n a s ti b a h , m s ir e n n a m s ’ r e t c a r a h
c I tmean stha tthe autho rcan
l a e v e
r character’ sbehaviorbotht heposiitveandnegaitve sones.
.
4 PersonaltiyDevelopment
n o it a z i n a g r o c i m a n y d e h t “ s n a e m ’ y ti l a n o s r e p ‘ m r e t e h t , s y a s t r o p ll A
i d n i e h t n i h ti
w vidua l o f those psychophysica l system s tha t determine hi s
o t g n i d r o c c A . ) 7 . p , 6 7 9 1 , k c o lr u H n i d e ti c s a ( ” t h g u o h t d n a r o i v a h e b c it s ir e t c a r a h c
) 5 9 9 1 ( e m m e
L in Developmen tand Adutlhood ,developmen ti s“a systemaitc t
r e v o r o i v a h e b n i s e g n a h
t a h t s n a e m t I . ) 8 . p ( ” t n e m n o ri v n e l a n r e t x e d n a l a n r e t n i e h t d n a l a u d i v i d n i
r o i v a h e b n i s e g n a h c e h t s i t n e m p o l e v e d y ti l a n o s r e
p a stheresutlf romi nteraciton
n e e w t e
b twoo rmoreindividual .s
k c o lr u
H (1976 ) in Personaltiy Development clair ife s tha t personaltiy s s e c o r p g n i k o v e d n a g n i g n a h c y lt n a t s n o c a f o h t w o r g n i e g a t s a “ s i t n e m p o l e v e d
” l a u d i v i d n i d n a n i h ti
w ( .p .)7 In personaltiy development ,there i sa se ire so f
s n a e m t I . l a u d i v i d n i n a n i s e g n a h c l a it n e u q e
s tha tin personaltiy developmen t
e l p o e p e s u a c e b o s s i y ti l a n o s r e p n i g n i g n a h c e h T . y ti l a n o s r e p n i e g n a h c s i e r e h t
t i e g n a h c o t e ri s e d n e tf o y e h T . y ti l a n o s r e p r i e h t h ti w d e if s it a s y l e t e l p m o c t o n e r a
r o m r e h tr u F . ti e v o r p m i o t r o r e tt e b e h t r o
f e, t herearesome choices t ha tmay be
y t e ir a v a s a h y t e i c o s e h t e s u a c e b t s r o w g n i e b r o , r e tt e b g n i e b , y d a e t s g n i e b : n e k a t
. y ti l a n o s r e p a o t s e c n e u lf n i f o
k c o lr u H o t g n i d r o c c
A (1976) ,anicepersonaltiybecomest hedemando fa
l l A . y ti l a n o s r e p h c u s s e ri u q e r t i d n a y t e i c o
s o fthe people wan tto change thei r
d e if s it a s e b r e v e n l li w e l p o e p t a h t n o m m o c s i tI . n o s r e p r e tt e b a e b o t y ti l a n o s r e p
s g n i g n o l e b r i e h t h ti
w ( .p119 .)
.
a Characterisitc so fChangei nPersonaltiy
Therearet hreecatego ire so fchangesi npersonaltiy.Theyarebette rversu s
( s e g n a h c d i p a r s u s r e v w o l s d n a , e v it a ti l a u q s u s r e v e v it a ti t n a u q , e s r o
w Hu lrock ,
)
1 Betterversu sworse
s “ e h t r o
F uccessfu ladjustment” ,the characte rdevelop s“ flthe s -e concept” a nd
s w o h
s g er ate rpoise ,sefl-con ifdence ,and sefl-assurance . On the othe r hand ,
n o s r e p e h t s t c e ri d t s u j d a o t e r u li a
f “ to dete iroraiton in the s -efl concep tand to
y ti r o ir e f n i d n a y c a u q e d a n i f o s g n il e e
f ” (Hulock ,p 0.1 - 22 1 1 .)
)
2 Quanttia itveversu squaltia itve
In quanttiaitve changes , “characteirsitc s arleady presen t are reinforced ,
d e n e k a e w r o d e n e h t g n e rt
s ” (Hu lrock ,p.121) .Undesriable rtati susually become
y ll a i c o s o t m r o f n o c d n a s ti a rt h c u s n e k a e w o t d e t a v it o m s i n o s r e p e h t s a n e k a e w
n o it a v it o m e h t f o r e g n o rt s e h T . s n r e tt a p d e v o r p p
a to win socia lapprova land
.s ti a rt e l b a ri s e d n e h t g n e rt s e c n a t p e c c
a In qualtiaitve changes ,an arleady-presen t
e l b a ri s e d a y ll a u s u , ti a rt r e h t o n a y b d e c a l p e r s i e n o e l b a ri s e d n u n a y ll a u s u , ti a rt
. e n o
)
3 Slowversu srapidchanges
e r a b a e r a s e g n a h c w o l s e h
T ly deifntiet o othe rcharacter .However , tii seasiert o
e h t e e
s rapidchange sbecauseeveryonecans ee ti .“Normally ,personaltiychange s
.l a u d a r g d n a w o l s e r
a Every change in personaltiy involves the violaiton o f
w e n a f o g n i n r a e l e h t d n a t i b a h s u o i v e r
p habi tto replace ti .Breaking the old
e b y a m d n a s s e c o r p s u o ir o b a l , w o l s a s y a w l a s i s e n o w e n e h t g n i n r a e l d n a s ti b a h
s e c n e ir e p x e d e t a e p e r h g u o r h t d e c r o f n i e r n e e b e v a h s ti b a h e h t r e tf a e l b i s s o p m
i ”
(Hu lrock ,p 1.1 -2 122 .)
.
b Condi iton sResponsiblef orPersonaltiyChange
k c o lr u
H (1976 ) states , tha t there are eigh t catego ire s o f condiiton s
. e g n a h c y ti l a n o s r e p r o f e l b i s n o p s e
r They are physica l changes , change s in
s s e r p l a i c o s n i s e g n a h c , e l p o e p t n a c if i n g i s n i s e g n a h c , t n e m n o ri v n
e ures ,change s
fl e s n i s e g n a h c , n o it a v it o m g n o rt s ,s e l o r n
i -concept ,anduseo fpsychotherapy.
)
1 Changesi nenvironment
n i s e g n a h c e h
T physica lo rsocia lenvrionmen t“may produce change sin the
fl e s s ’ n o s r e
p -concep tandhi scharacteirsitc sbehavior” (Hu lrock ,p.125 .)
)
2 Changei ns igniifcan tpeople
. g n i m r o f y ti l a n o s r e p e h t n i t n i o p y e k e h t e r a l a u d i v i d n i h c a e f o s e c n e ir e p x e e h T
s e n o d o o g e h t e t a ti m i o t d e p o h s i n o s r e p h c a e , e s r u o c f O . e t a ti m i d n a n r a e l e l p o e P
e l p o e p t n a c if i n g i s e h t e k
il .Onet hingt hats houldber ememberedi st ha t“when the
s i h t p a d a o t s e ir t e h n e h w d n a e g n a h c e fi l s ’l a u d i v i d n i n a n i e l p o e p t n a c if i n g i s
s ri e h t o t n o it a ri p s a d n a s e u l a v , s f e il e b , s e d u ti tt a s i h d n a r o i v a h e b f o n r e tt a
p ” ,
a c n r e tt a p y ti l a n o s r e p s i h n i s e g n a h
c nno tbe avoid .“These change smay no tbe
d e k r a
m ,no raret heyalway spermanent” (Hu lrock ,p.126).
)
3 Changesi ns ocia lpressure
t a h t s e t a t s k c o lr u
H “Since everyonenormally ha sa srtong desriet o be accepted
o t s e ir t e h , m i h o t t n a c if i n g i s e r a o h w e s o h t y
b change any personaltiy rtatit ha t
d e t p e c c a g n i e b s i h t s n i a g a e t a ti li m l li
w ” .(p126) .He also say stha t“Shyness ,
“ s a h c u s , s e it il a n o s r e p d e ri m d
a affeciton , ambiiton , cooperaitvenes s and
y ti s o r e n e
g ” (Hu lrock ,p.126).
.
B Theoreitca lFramework
t s ri f e h T . y d u t s s i h t n i d e s s u c s i d e b d l u o h s t a h t s m e l b o r p o w t e r a e r e h T
e h t s i e n
o descirpiton s o fBella Swan and Jacob Black .The second one i s
g n i n i m a x
e Bella’ spersonaltiydevelopmen ta sar esul to fJacobBlack’ sin lfuence
l e v o n e h t n i d e l a e v e r s i ti s
a , NewMoon .
o s e r a e r e h t , s m e l b o r p e s o h t e v l o s o
T me theo ire sused in thi sstudy.
Characte rbyRoge rB .Henkle(1977) ,W .J .Harvey (1965) ,Thoma sR .Arp and
n o s n h o J g e r
G (2009) help to analyze Bella and Jacob’ s characters .
Characteirzaiton by M .J .Murphy (1972) in Understanding Unseen are used to d
n a s e it il a n o s r e p e h t t u o b a g n i d n a t s r e d n u r e tt e b t e
g charactersi nt henovel( p.1 -61
. ) 3 7
1 Because thi sstudy use sltierary work ,characte rand characte irzaiton are
l a e v e r o t d e s
u BellaSwan’ sandJ acobBlack’ spersonaltiy rtatis.
g n i d n a t s r e d n u n i , e r o m r e h tr u
F Bella’ spersonaltiydevelopmen ta sar esul t
e c n e u lf n i s ’ b o c a J f
o ,thi sstudy appiled some theo ires abou tpersonaltiy and
s
p ychology .Because thi sstudy use spsychologica lapproach ,Hu lrock’ stheory
) 6 7 9 1
( in Personaltiy Development i s used to analyze Bella’ s personaltiy e
c n e u lf n i s ’ b o c a J f o t l u s e r a s a t n e m p o l e v e
d (Hu lrock 119-131 .) There aret hree
. y ti l a n o s r e p n i s e g n a h c f o s e ir o g e t a
c They are bette rversu sworse ,quanttiaitve
T . s e g n a h c d i p a r s u s r e v w o l s d n a , e v it a ti l a u q s u s r e
e g n a h c y ti l a n o s r e p r o f e l b i s n o p s e r s n o it i d n o
c in t hi snovel .They are changes i n
8 1
I I I R E T P A H C
Y G O L O D O H T E M
h c a o r p p a , y d u t s e h t f o t c e j b o y l e m a n , s tr a p e e r h t f o s t s i s n o c r e t p a h c s i h T
l a r e n e g s e v i g y d u t s e h t f o t c e j b O . y d u t s e h t f o d o h t e m d n a , y d u t s e h t f o
t a h t ) s e ( h c a o r p p a e h t s n r e c n o c y d u t s e h t f o h c a o r p p A . k r o w e h t t u o b a n o it a n a l p x e
y d u t s s i h t n i d e s u e b l li
w .Method of t hestudy menitons t hestep t o analyze t he .
a t a d
.
A Objec toft heStudy
l e v o n s ’ r e y e M e i n e h p e t S s i y d u t s e h t f o t c e j b o e h
T NewMoon .Thi snovel
s i h T . e u g o li p e d n a , s r e t p a h c 4 2 , e c a f e r p o t n i d e d i v i d s i d n a s e g a p 3 6 5 f o s t s i s n o c
il b u p s a w l e v o
n shed by Ltilte , Brown in the USA on 6 Septembe r 2006 . ,r
a e y e h t f o s k o o b d e t a p i c it n a t s o m e h t f o e n o g n i m o c e
B thi snovelrosequicklyt o
( s t s il r e ll e s t s e b f o p o t e h
t New YorkTimesBes tSelle r ilstand USA Today' sTop .)
s r e ll e s t s e B 0 5
1 Driected by Ch ir sWetiz ,a flim adaptaiton o fNew Moon wa s s
r a t s m li f e h T . 9 0 0 2 r e b m e v o N 0 2 n o d e s a e l e
r K irsten Stewatr sa Bella Swan , n
o s n it t a P t r e b o
R sa EdwardCullen ,andTaylo rLautner sa JacobBlack .Thisf lim .s
e ir t n u o c y n a m n i e c if f o x o b e m a c e b o s l a
f o r o h t u a e h
T NewMoon ,StephenieMeyer ,wa sbornDecembe r24 ,1973 ;
g n il l e s t s e b e h t f o r o h t u a n a c ir e m A e h t s i e h S . T C , d r o ft r a H n
i Twiilght seire s
2
( 0 -05 2008) ,Hel lon Earth (Shor tStory i n 'Prom Nightsf romHel'l)( 2007) ,and t
s o H e h
. e n o l a . S . U e h t n i s e i p o c n o il li m 5 . 8 r e v o d n a s e ir t n u o c 7 3 n
i Twiilghtist hef ris t
n e h t k o o
b New Moon ,Ecilpse, and Breaking Down i sthe second ,thrid ,and .
h tr u o
f Twiilght seire srevolve saround the relaitonship between mo tra lBella . fl o w e r e w d n a e ri p m a v , s e r u t a e r c l a tr o m m i d n a n a w S n o o M w e
N i sabou tthe darkes t itme o fBella’ slfie when he rboyfirend , . s k r o F m o r f y a w a e v o m o t d n a p i h s n o it a l e r r i e h t d n e o t s e d i c e d , n e ll u C d r a w d E e c n e s e r p s ' b o c a J , y a w a s i d r a w d E e li h W . d e s s e r p e d d n a n e k o r b tr a e h s ’ a ll e B a h C f o n o s e h t d n a e t u e li u Q a , k c a l B b o c a J . t s e h c a ll e B n i " e l o h " e h t s e h t o o
s rile
. s k r o F n i e v il o t e m a c e h s e c n i s d n e ir f t s e b s 'a ll e B s i , k c a l B y ll i B , d n e ir f s ' n a w S r e h h ti w e m it f o t o l a s d n e p s d n a e m it e m o s r e tf a a ll e B h ti w e v o l n i s ll a f e H , d r a w d E e c a l p e r o t e l b a n u s i b o c a J h g u o h T . e c n e s b a s ' d r a w d E f o d o ir e p e h t g n ir u d p p a h e h
t ines sbackst oBellas'l fiewhen shei sbeing around him .Bellaf eelst ha t m a e b d l u o w h c i h w " n u s e lt ti l l a n o s r e p " n w o r e h d n a d n e ir f d o o g a s i b o c a J . t n e w e h r e v e r e h w n o it c e ri d y r e v e n i s s e n i p p a h .
B Approachoft heStudy
e h T . h c a o r p p a l a c i g o l o h c y s p s e s u r e ti r w e h t , l e v o n s i h t e z y l a n a o T y s
p chologica lapproach help su sto analyze from the poin to fview o fhuman d n a s n r e tt a p r o i v a h e b s ’ g n i e b n a m u h h ti w s e t a l e r h c a o r p p a e h T . g n i e b e v e d y ti l a n o s r e p s ’ a ll e B . t h g u o h t s u o i c s n o c n
a ll e B d n a t s r e d n u o t y d u t s s i h t p l e h y l n o t o n l li w d l e
if andJacob’ spersonaltiybu t w o h o s l
a Bella’ spersonaltiydevelop sa sar esul to fJacob’si n lfuence.
.
C Methodoft heStudy
r e y e M e i n e h p e t S m o r f l e v o n e h t s a w y d u t s s i h t f o e c r u o s y r a m ir p e h T , fl e s
ti NewMoon .Thesecondary source sarebook sofl tierature ,psychology ,and d n a r e t c a r a h c t u o b a s i k o o b e r u t a r e ti l e h T . t e n r e t n i e h t m o r f s e c r u o s e m o s .t n e m p o l e v e d y ti l a n o s r e p n o e r a s k o o b y g o l o h c y s p e h t e li h w , n o it a z ir e t c a r a h c . m e l b o r p e h t r e w s n a o t n e k a t e r a s p e t s e m o s , y d u t s s i h t t c u d n o c o t r e d r o n I t s ri f e h
T stepwasr eading t henovelf o rsevera l itme .s I twa sdonei n ordert o ge t g n i d a e r e li h w e d a m e r e w s e t o n y r a s s e c e n e m o S . l e v o n e h t n o g n i d n a t s r e d n u e r o m e h
t nove;l the note s were focusing on the personaltiy development . Some e h t d e t a rt s u ll i h c i h w s e u g o l a i
d in lfuence o fothe rcharacter swerealso t aken i nto .t n u o c c a s a w h c r a e s e r y r a r b il e h T . s e c n e r e f e r e m o s g n i d a e r s a w p e t s d n o c e s e h T e r e w a t a D . a t a d e h t tr o p p u s o t s e c r u o s e m o s e r e w e r e h t e r e h w p e t s s i h t n i d e s u s e ir o e h t , e r u t a r e ti l f o s k o o b m o r f d e t c e ll o
c on characte rand characteirzaiton , . s i s y l a n a s ti h c ir n e y a m t a h t s k o o b r e h t o d n a , t n e m p o l e v e d y ti l a n o s r e p f o s e ir o e h t .t e n r e t n i m o r f n e k a t s a w n o it a m r o f n i r e h tr u F d n a n o it a m r o f n i a t a d e h t g n i s u l e v o n e h t g n i z y l a n a s a w p e t s d ri h t e h T r e ti r w e h T . s e c n e r e f e
e h t g n ir e w s n a r e tf A . y d u t s e h t f o n o i s u l c n o c e h t g n i k a m s a w p e t s t s a l e h T
s n o it s e u
q in the problem formulaiton ,the wrtie rmade conclusion o fthe study . .s
2 2
V I R E T P A H C
S I S Y L A N A
m e l b o r p e h t n i d e t a t s e r a h c i h w , s n o it s e u q o w t e h t s e s s u c s i d r e t p a h c s i h T
d n a n a w S a ll e B f o s n o it p ir c s e d e h t h ti w s l a e d s i s y l a n a t s ri f e h T . n o it a l u m r o f
. k c a l B b o c a
J The second analysi s deal s wtih Bella Swan’ s personaltiy
t n e m p o l e v e
d sa ar esul tofJacobBlack’ sin lfuence.
.
A TheDescripiton so fBellaSwanandJacobBlack
l a e v e r o
T thedescirpiton so fBellaSwan and Jacob Black,t hewrtie ruse s
r e t c a r a h c f o y r o e h
t from Thoma sR .ArpandGreg Johnson, W .J .Harvey ,Roge r
e l k n e H .
B (Arp and Johnson, pp 3.16 -1 64; Harvey, pp. 54 - 74 ; Henkle, .p 78 .)
n o s n h o J g e r G d n a p r A . R s a m o h
T (2009 )classfiy characters i nto lfa tcharacter ,
r e t c a r a h c c i m a n y d r o g n i p o l e v e d d n a , r e t c a r a h c c it a t s , r e t c a r a h c d n u o
r p( p 3.16
-) 4 6
1 .W .J .Harvey (1965 )say stha tthere are three catego ire so fcharacter :
r e t c a r a h c t s i n o g a t o r
p ,background character ,and intermediate ifgure character
p
( p 5. - )4 47 .Roge rB .Henkle (1977 )disitnguishe scharactersi nto majo ro rmain
r e t c a r a h c y r a d n o c e s r o r o n i m e h t d n a r e t c a r a h
c (p.87) .
e h t n i s r e t c a r a h c d n a s e it il a n o s r e p e h t t u o b a g n i d n a t s r e d n u r e tt e b t e g o T
l e v o
n , the wrtie r use s theory o f characteirzaiton by M . J . Murphy (1972) ,
n e e s n U g n i d n a t s r e d n
,r e h t o n
a speech , pas tlfie ,conversaiton o fothers ,reacitons ,driec tcomment ,
( m s ir e n n a m d n a t h g u o h
t Murphy ,pp. 11 -6 173) .
.
1 BellaSwan
s e s s u c s i d t r a p s i h
T personaltiy rtatis and socia l rt s ati o fBella Swan in
s ’ r e y e M e i n e h p e t
S (2006 )NewMoon .Refer irngt oHenkle’ sandHarvey’st heory , m o r f s r a e p p a e h S . r e t c a r a h c t s i n o g a t o r p e h t r o r e t c a r a h c r o j a m e h t s i n a w S a ll e B
. s r e t c a r a h c r e h t o e h t n a h t n e tf o e r o m d n a y r o t s e h t f o d n e e h t li t n u g n i n n i g e b e h t
r a n o s l a s i l e v o n s i h
T rated from Bella’ s poin t o fview .Relaitng to A & rp
n o s n h o
J s ’theory, Bella can be included into round characte rbecause Bella’ s
y lt n a t s n o c e g n a h c d n a x e l p m o c , c i m a n y d e r a r e t c a r a h
c .
.
a PersonaltiyTratis
)
1 Caring
a s i a ll e
B kindgri lwtihasrtongheatrt osuppo trinherf amliy .Shealway s
r e h t u o b a s r e d i s n o
c parents’ feeilng. She understand she rfamliy condiiton and
p l e h o t s e ir
t them .Compared t o somecommon daughtersin he ragewho moslty
a ll e B , s g n il e e f n w o r i e h t t u o b a e r a
c can becatego irzed asacairng daughte rwho
s y a w l
a pay satteniton abou the rfamliy ,especially t o t hedetali so fa stiuaiton o r
g n i h t e m o
s . When he rmother ,Renee ,ha sremarired and goes t o ilve i n Flo irda ,
s k r o F t a e s u o h s ’ r e h t a f r e h o t s e v o m a ll e
B . eS nh eve rwantst o l eavehi smother
s e ir r o w r e h t o m r e h t n a w t o n s e o d e h s t u
b abou ther. oS ,shedecidest o moveand
. y p p a h r e h t o m r e h e k a m
, r e t h g u a d d n a r e h t a f a s
A Bella and Charile havean awkward relaiton .I t
s n e p p a
a ll e
B also consider she rfather’ scondiiton .Shedoessomehousehold j obsi n t he
e m o h t a d l e
if and manage she racitvtiy .She neve rwants t o hur tor t o makehe r
. e fi l r e h t u o b a s e ir r o w r e h t a
f So ,sheneve rha scalledherf athe ra twork fit herei s
. y c n e g r e m e o
n Oneday ,whenBellacall she ra twork ,herf athe rfeel ssurp irse.
e h t p u d e k c i p e h s a n o o s s a d e d n a m e d e il r a h C ” ? a ll e B , g n o r w s ’t a h W “
. e n o h p
” ? y c n e g r e m e n a g n i e b e r e h t t u o h ti w k r o w t a u o y l l a c I t ’ n a C “
n a e r e h t s I
