Analysis of transgenic grapevine (
Vitis rupestris
) and
Nicotiana
benthamiana
plants expressing an
Arabis mosaic
6
irus
coat protein
gene
Albert Spielmann
a,*, Stoyanka Krastanova
b, Ve´ronique Douet-Orhant
a, Paul Gugerli
caLaboratoire de biochimie,Uni6ersite´ de Neuchaˆtel,Emile-Argand11,2007Neuchaˆtel,Switzerland bProfigen/Agri6itis,Columbia Crest Dri6e,PO Box188,Paterson,WA99345,USA cStation Fe´de´rale de Recherches en Production Ve´ge´tale de Changins,1260Nyon,Switzerland
Received 13 September 1999; received in revised form 20 March 2000; accepted 20 March 2000
Abstract
A disarmed LBA4404 strain ofAgrobacterium tumefaciensharboring a binary vector which contained chimeric genes encoding the neomycin phosphotransferase (nptII) and the coat protein (CP) ofArabis mosaic nepo6irus(ArMV) was used in co-cultivation
experiments with leaf discs of Nicotiana benthamiana and somatic embryos of the grapevine rootstock cultivarVitis rupestris. Transgenic N. benthamiana expressing the ArMV CP gene were regenerated and six independent lines were characterized. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) performed on leaf tissue demonstrated the accumulation of the ArMV CP in five of the six lines analyzed. Immunosorbent electron microscopy (ISEM) studies revealed the presence of virion-like isometric particles (VLPs) reacting to a rabbit antiserum specific to ArMV virions. ArMV-CP expressing transgenicN.benthamiana lines showed protection against ArMV expressed as a delay in infection and a reduction of the percentage of infected plants. Four independent transgenic lines ofV.rupestristransformed with the ArMV CP gene were regenerated and characterized. In contrast toN.benthamiana, transgenicV.rupestrisdid not accumulate the ArMV CP at levels detectable by ELISA and no VLPs could be observed by ISEM. Northern blot analysis showed that the ArMV CP mRNA was expressed at lower level in V. rupestris compared withN.benthamiana. The reason for this difference in transgene expression and/or mRNA stability between grapevine andN.benthamianais unclear, but the genetic state of the transgene(s) (homozygous inN.benthamianaversus hemizygous inV. rupestris) may have an effect on gene expression. © 2000 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:Coat protein-mediated virus resistance; Nepovirus; Grapevine;Nicotiana benthamiana; Plant virus resistance
www.elsevier.com/locate/plantsci
1. Introduction
Nepoviruses are plant viruses with polyedric particles which are transmitted via soil-inhabiting longidorid nematodes (Xiphinema and Longidorus
spp.). They are responsible for economically im-portant diseases, especially of perennial plants such as grapevine and fruit trees. Their genome is composed of two separately encapsidated positive single-stranded RNAs. In grapevine, the most
damaging and widespread nepoviruses are
Grape6ine fanleaf6irus (GFLV) and Arabis mosaic 6irus (ArMV), both responsible for the disease
known as infectious degeneration or ‘court-noue´’. The disease is controlled by soil disinfection using nematicides. This procedure is forbidden in Switzerland, Germany, Italy and some States in the USA, due to the high toxicity of the chemical (dichlorpropen). Virus-resistant transgenic grapevine plants would be an ecological alterna-tive to control the disease.
Since the first report on resistance to Tobacco mosaic 6irus (TMV) in transgenic tobacco plants
expressing TMV coat protein (CP) [1], similar results have been obtained for a broad spectrum
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +41-32-7182222; fax: + 41-32-7182201.
E-mail address: [email protected] (A. Spielmann).
of plant viruses [2]. CP-mediated protection against nepoviruses has been demonstrated in transgenic
Nicotiana benthamiana expressing the ArMV CP gene [3], the Tomato ringspot 6irus CP gene [4], or the GFLV CP gene [5], and in transgenicN.tabacum
expressing the Strawberry latent ringspot 6irus CP
gene [6], or the Grape6ine chrome mosaic 6irus CP gene [7]. The formation of virus-like particles result-ing from the accumulation of transgenic nepovirus CP in plant tissues was demonstrated for the ArMV CP in N. benthamiana [8]. Genetic transformation of various grapevine tissues and regeneration of transgenic plants have been reported for a number of grapevine rootstocks and cultivars [9]. Recents reports described the regeneration of transgenic grapevine plants expressing a chimeric GFLV CP gene after transformation of somatic embryos of the rootstock cvs 110 Richter [10,11], Gloire de Mont-pellier, 3309 Couderc, Millardet de Grasset 101-14 [11], 41B and SO4, and the Vitis 6inifera variety
Chardonnay [12]. In these cases, expression of the GFLV CP transgene leads to the accumulation of the CP in transgenic tissue (detected by ELISA), but the presence of virion-like isometric particles (VLPs) was not reported.
In this paper, we describe the expression of a chimeric ArMV CP gene in an annual herbaceous species, N. benthamiana, and a woody perennial species,V.rupestris. The transgenicN.benthamiana
lines expressed the ArMV CP gene at high levels and accumulation of ArMV CP resulted in the forma-tion of VLPs in plant tissue. In contrast, none of the transgenicV.rupestrislines accumulated the ArMV CP at a detectable level. Data from northern blot experiments showed that the apparent lack of ArMV CP protein accumulation in V. rupestris
tissue was correlated to differences in transgene expression levels and/or RNA stability in grapevine tissues compared withN.benthamiana. Little or no transgene mRNA could be detected in transgenic grapevine tissues. Progeny of ArMV CP-expressing transgenic N. benthamiana lines showed resistance against ArMV.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Multiplication and purification of Arabis mosaic 6irus
ArMV isolate Triaca 782 was isolated in 1985 from degenerated grapevine (J.-J. Brugger,
unpub-lished results) and propagated on Chenopodium quinoa. The virus was purified [13] and viral RNA extracted as described [14].
2.2. Isolation of the ArMV CP gene
The ArMV CP is encoded as part of a polyprotein by RNA-2 [15]. ArMV RNA-2 cDNA was synthe-sized according to standard procedures (Super-script, Life Technologies) and the cDNA was directly used in various PCR reactions. Based on the published ArMV-CP sequences [16 – 18], two primers were designed to engineer the ArMV CP gene by adding a methionine initiation codon: a sense upstream primer (ARMV-1), homologous to the first 18 nucleotides of the ArMV CP region, containing in addition an ATG initiation codon and a BclI site at the 5%-end (TGATCATCCATG -GGACTTGCTGGTAGAGG), and a reverse dow-stream primer (ARMV-2), complementary to the last 22 nucleotides of the ArMV CP gene, carrying in addition an XbaI site at the 5%-end (TCTA
-GAAACCTAAACTTTAAAACATGT). The am-plified ArMV CP fragment was then cloned into the
EcoRV site of the pUC-8 vector, creating plasmid pARMV-1 (Fig. 1). The ArMV CP gene was completely sequenced by the PCR cycle sequencing method (fmole kit, Promega).
2.3. Construction of a functional chimeric ArMV CP gene
ABclI –XbaI fragment from pARMV-1 contain-ing the complete ArMV CP gene was inserted into the BamHI and SstI sites of the binary vector pBI121.1, replacing the uidA gene [19]. The resulting plasmid (pCACP-1) contained the ArMV CP gene under the control of the CaMV 35S promoter and the nopaline synthase terminator (Fig. 1).
2.4. Plant transformation
The plasmid pCACP-1 was transferred from E.
coli to A. tumefaciens LBA4404 by triparental mating. In vitro-grown leaf explants ofN.benthami
transfor-mation and regeneration were essentially per-formed as described [10].
2.5. Characterization of transgenic plants
The ability to form roots on media containing kanamycin (50 mg/l for N. benthamiana and 10 mg/l for V. rupestris) was used as the first indica-tor of the transgenic status of the regenerated plantlets, since these amounts of kanamycin com-pletely inhibited root formation of in vitro-grown wild type N. benthamiana or V. rupestris plants (data no shown). Integration of the transgenes was confirmed by Southern analysis using total DNA extracted from 0.5 to 1.0 g of fresh leaf tissue of in
vitro-grown N. benthamiana or V. rupestris plants following the procedure described [21]. For South-ern analysis, 3 – 5mg of plant DNA was digested withEcoRI orEcoRV, electrophoresed on a 0.7% agarose gel in 1×Tris – borate – EDTA buffer, and blotted onto a charged Nylon membrane (Boer-hinger, Mannheim) by capillarity transfer under denaturing conditions (0.4 M NaOH). Transferred DNA were hybridized to 32P-labelled purified DNA fragment corresponding to the ArMV CP or the npt II coding region. Presence of the ArMV CP transcript sequences was assayed by northern blot analysis. Total plant RNA was extracted from in vitro-grown plants of N. benthamiana by the acid guanidium – thiocyanate – phenol –
chloro-Fig. 1. Construction of the vector pCACP-1. After cDNA synthesis using random hexamers as primers, the coding region of the ArMV CP was specifically amplified using an upstream primer (ARMV-1) complementary to the first 18 nucleotides of the CP coding region according to the published ArMV CP sequence [16 – 18] and carrying in addition aBclI site at its 5%-end and a
methionine initiation codon, and a dowstream primer (ARMV-2) homologous to the last 22 nucleotides of the CP coding region and carrying anXbaI site at its 5%-end. The 1539 bp amplified fragment corresponding to the ArMV CP coding region was cloned
form method [22] following the recommendations of the supplier (reagent commercialized by Life Technologies as Trizol). For grapevine, total nucleic acids were isolated as described [21] and total RNA were subsequently purified by the acid guanidium – thiocyanate – phenol – chloroform method procedure. About 10 mg of RNA were separated by electrophoresis on a denaturing formaldehyde – agarose gel, transferred to a nylon membrane, and probed with a digoxigenin-labeled purified DNA fragment corresponding to the ArMV CP region. ArMV CP mRNAs were visual-ized by chemiluminescent detection (Boehringer Mannheim). The R1 progeny of transgenic N.
benthamiana plants were screened for kanamycin resistance (kanR) phenotype by germinating seeds (at least 100 seeds for each individual lines) on agar plates containing MS medium supplemented with 400 mg/l kanamycin sulfate. Seeds were surface-sterilized in 10% commercial bleach for 20 min and rinsed twice in sterile distilled water. Lines producing 100% kanR seeds were used for further analysis. For grapevine, primary transformants were propagated in vitro from nodal cuttings according to standard proce-dures.
2.6. Expression of the ArMV CP gene in transgenic plants
Expression of the ArMV CP gene in transgenic plants was first determined by enzyme linked im-munosorbent assay (ELISA), using a rabbit anti-serum to ArMV virion essentially as described [13]. Leaf material (0.3 – 0.5 g) from in-vitro grown
N.bentamiana or V.rupestris were ground in 3 ml of extraction buffer (0.5 M Tris – HCl, 2% PVP, 1% PEG 6000, 0.14 M NaCl, 0.05% Tween, 0.02% NaN3, pH 8.2). Optical densities were measured at 405 nm 2 h after addition of the substrate (p -nitro-phenylphosphate at 1 mg/ml).
2.7. Electron microscopy
Crude leaf sap from N. benthamiana plants grown under greenhouse conditions (4 – 6-week-old) or from 2-week-old seedlings were negatively stained with phosphotungstic acid and viewed on carbon-coated, Formvar-filmed grids using a Philips 300 electron microscope according to [23,24].
2.8. Protection experiments
R2 seedling progeny from self-fertilized R1 transgenic N. benthamiana producing 100% kanR seeds were used to evaluate resistance to ArMV infection. Similar numbers (at least 15 plants) of transgenic and control (non-transformed) plants consisting of 6-week-old greenhouse grown seedlings were dusted with Carborundum and were mechanically inoculated with a 1:50 diluted crude sap from systemically ArMV-infected C.
quinoa leaves. The inoculum was prepared in 0.01 M phosphate buffer pH 7.0 containing 0.01 M sodium diethylthiocarbamate. Because ArMV CP expressing transgenic N. benthamiana lines con-tained serologically detectable amount of ArMV CP, the extent of infection was checked 2, 4 and 8 weeks post-inoculation by back transmission of a 1:100 dilution of inoculated N. benthamiana
upper leaf homogenate to healthy C. quinoa. ArMV infection in C. quinoa was monitored by ELISA 9, 11 and 14 days after back-transmission. The percentage of infected N. benthamiana plants was calculated as the percentage of infected C.
quinoa measured 14 days post back inocula-tion.
3. Results
3.1. Construction of the pCACP-1 transformation 6ector
The structure of the pCACP-1 transformation vector is illustrated in Fig. 1. The integrity of the ArMV CP and the correct addition of the ATG initiation were verified by sequencing. Comparison of the CP deduced amino acid sequence of isolate Triaca 782 with that of published ArMV sequences of [8,16] reveals a very high degree of homology (93 and 97% identity, respec-tively).
3.2. Characterization of regenerated plants
Seventeen putative transgenic N. benthamiana
lines transformed with the pCACP-1 plasmid were regenerated. Genomic DNA isolated from a subset of seven kanamycin resistant N. benthamiana
Fig. 2. Molecular characterization of seven transgenicN.benthamianaplants transformed with the ArMV CP gene. (A) Southern blot analysis of DNA isolated fromN.benthamianaplants. Total DNA (3 – 5mg) prepared from an untransformed control plant (wt), or transgenic lines 65-1, 65-2, 65-3, 65-5, 65-6, 65-8 and 65-10 was digested withEcoRI orEcoRV, electrophoresed, and blotted onto Nylon membrane. The probe was a 1.5-kb fragment corresponding to the entire ArMV CP region (solid bar in B).
32P-labelled lambda DNA was also included in the hybridization mixture to reveal the position of the molecular weight marker
fragments. M, lambda DNA cut withHindIII used as molecular weight marker; C, 40 pg of plasmid pCACP-1 cut withEcoRV. In the EcoRV digest, the expected 1.1 kb ArMV-CP internal fragment is indicated by an arrow. (B) The top line shows a schematic representation of the T-DNA from the plasmid pCACP-1 integrated in the plant genome. The symbols used are the same as in Fig. 1. The size of the expected internalEcoRV fragment and the minimum expected sizes for theEcoRI orEcoRV border fragments are shown below.
EcoRI or EcoRV, and characterized by Southern analysis using a 1.5 kb fragment corresponding to the entire ArMV CP as probe (Fig. 2B). In the
EcoRI digest, one to three fragments hybridized to the probe in each plant (Fig. 2A). The bands represent right border fragments (Fig. 2), allowing the determination of T-DNA insertion loci and showing that, with the exception of plants 65-5 and 65-6, all the plants gave a specific hybridiza-tion pattern, demonstrating that they arose from independent transformation events. The use of
EcoRV allowed the detection of both an internal T-DNA fragment of 1.1 kb and border fragments
sensitive R2 seedlings was 3:1 from a self for all
the lines analyzed, except line 65-3 (ratio 15:1), demonstrating that T-DNA insertion at a single locus occured in most of the lines, except line 65-3 (2 loci).
Only seven transgenic V. rupestris lines trans-formed with pCACP-1 could be regenerated. Hy-bridization results of five kanamycin resistant V.
rupestris plants are shown in Fig. 3, in which a 1.5-kb fragment corresponding to the entire ArMV CP was used as probe. Data for EcoRV digests (Fig. 3) showed that, with the exception of lines 030502 and 030505, which appeared to be identical based on their hybridization patterns, all transgenic lines arose from independent transfor-mation events. In addition, all have at least one intact copy of the ArMV CP gene. Line 030502 (=030505) contained a very high number of
T-Fig. 4. ELISA detection of the ArMV CP in the R2 progeny of six transgenicN.benthamianalines and in four transgenic V. rupestris lines. The OD450 nm was measured 2 h after addition of the substrate (p-nitrophenylphosphate). Ext. buf, extraction buffer; N.b. wt, untransformed N. benthamiana plant; 03wt, healthyV.rupestrisplant; 03(ArMV), ArMV-in-fected V.rupestris plant.
Fig. 3. Molecular characterization of five transgenicV. rupes-tris plants transformed with the ArMV CP gene. Southern blot analysis of DNA isolated fromV.rupestrisplants. Total DNA (3 – 5mg) prepared from an untransformed control plant (wt), or transformants 030501, 030502, 030503, 030505 and 030506 digested with EcoRV, electrophoresed and blotted onto Nylon membrane. Hybridization conditions were as described in Fig. 2B. M, lambda DNA cut withHindIII used as molecular weight marker. For a schematic representation of the T-DNA from the plasmid pCACP-1 integrated in the plant genome, see Fig. 2B. The expected 1.1 kb ArMV CP internal fragment is indicated by an arrow.
DNA inserts (seven to ten copies), probably as-sembled as complex tandem and/or inverted repeat units, whereas lines 030501 and 030506 contained at least one insert and line 030503 probably two inserts. Results from Southern blots using other probe/enzyme combinations (data not shown) confirmed these findings and revealed that out of the seven regenerated transgenic V. rupestris lines, only four arose from independent transformation events (lines 030501, 030502, 030503 and 030506).
3.3. Expression of the ArMV CP gene
Expression of the ArMV CP transgene in trans-genic N. benthamina and V. rupestris was first tested by ELISA using a rabbit antiserum specific to ArMV virions (Fig. 4). Six of the seven trans-genic N. benthamiana lines analyzed accumulated the ArMV CP at various levels, whereas no ex-pression was detected in untransformed N. ben
65-5) (Fig. 5a). Confirmation of the identity of the VLPs was performed by immunodetection using a rabbit polyclonal antiserum specific to ArMV virions (Fig. 5b).
In contrast, VLPs were not detected inV.rupes
-tris despite several attempts of enrichment by su-crose gradient.
To determine whether the lack of ArMV CP accumulation in transgenicV.rupestris was due to
transgene expression level, we compared the ArMV CP gene expression by northern blot in transgenic V. rupestris and N. benthamiana plants using approximately the same amount of total RNA (10 mg) (Fig. 6). The expected mRNA tran-script was detected in most of the transgenic N.
benthamiana lines analyzed, with the exception of line 65-8 whereas none was detected in a control plant (wt). A band of the expected size was also visible in the four transgenic V. rupestris lines (030501, 030502, 030503, 030506), but the hy-bridization signal was weaker than that found in transgenic N. benthamiana plants, partic-ularly in line 030506. No band corresponding to the ArMV CP mRNA was detected in an untransformed grapevine plant (wt), and in ArMV-infected V. rupestris (lane wt+ArMV). In the latter case, the expected 3760 nt band corre-sponding to the genomic ArMV RNA-2 was clearly visible.
3.4. Protection experiments
Homozygous N. benthamiana R2 progeny were used for protection studies. Preliminary experi-ments using an inoculum consisting of a 1:10, 1:50 and 1:100 diluted crude leaf sap of ArMV-infected
Chenopodium quinoa demonstrated that the 1:50 concentration was sufficient to obtain more than 90% infection of control plants. This dilution was therefore used in further studies. Two weeks post-inoculation, 69% of the non-transformed plants were infected, while the percentage of infection of the six independent transgenic lines was signifi-cantly lower (from 11% for lines 65-1 and 65-3
up to 55% for lines 65-5 and 65-8) (Fig. 7). Four weeks post inoculation, almost 85% of the non-transformed plants were infected, whereas this percentage remained significantly lower for most of the transgenic lines. Two lines (65-1 and 65-2) showed a significant resistance phenotype, with only 13% (65-1) or 28% (65-2) of infection 4 weeks post inoculation. Three lines (65-3, 65-8 and 65-10) had a low level of re-sistance (55 to 60%). One line (65-5) showed a high percentage of infection not significantly dif-ferent from the non-transformed plants. After 8 weeks, all the transgenic lines were infected at the same level as the control plants, demonstrating that the protection phenotype was overcome over time.
Fig. 5. Electron microscopy of negatively stained VLPs in crude leaf sap of transgenicN.benthamiana: (a) without prior incubation with an ArMV specific antiserum; (b) with prior incubation with a rabbit antiserum specific to ArMV virions. Bar=100 nm.
Fig. 6. Northern blot analysis. Total plant RNA were ex-tracted from in 6itro grown plants of N.benthamiana orV.
Fig. 7. Protection experiments in N.benthamiana plants ho-mozygous for the ArMV CP gene. Each curve represents at least 15 plants. Six-week-old greenhouse grown seedlings were dusted with Carborundum and were mechanically inoculated with 1:50 diluted crude sap from systemically ArMV-infected Chenopodium quinoa leaves. Inoculated plants were observed daily for the development of systemic symptoms. Because ArMV CP expressing transgenic N. benthamiana lines con-tained serologically detectable amount of ArMV CP, the extent of infection was tested 2, 4 and 8 weeks post-inocula-tion by back transmission to C. quinoa. The percentage of infectedN.benthamianaplants was deduced from the percent-age of infectedC.quinoameasured 14 days post back inocula-tion by ELISA.
with the same chimeric gene did not accumulate the ArMV CP product at detectable levels and no VLPs were produced in grapevine cells. The lack of ArMV CP accumulation in transgenicV. rupes
-trismay have several reasons. Data from southern blotting experiments showed that all transgenic V.
rupestris lines had at least one apparently intact copy of the transgene.
However, transgene expression studies by north-ern blot analysis demonstrated that the ArMV CP transcript accumulated at lower level in V. rupes
-triscompared toN.benthamiana. Several hypothe-sis could account for the apparent reduced level of ArMV CP in transgenic grapevine tissues. First, the rate of transgenes transcription driven by the CaMV 35S promoter might be significantly lower in grapevine compared to other dicot plants, but this can be ruled out because several reports have shown good expression of various transgenes in grapevine using this promoter [9,10]. Second, fail-ure to extract RNA of good quality from grapevine may lead to partial or complete degra-dation of the transgene RNA. However, recent northern blot data obtained after successive hy-bridizations of the same blot to a control house-keeper gene (N. benthamiana actin gene), then to a specific ArMV CP sequence showed only a slight degradation of the grapevine RNA samples which could not account for the differences observed. Third, transgene RNA turn-over may be higher in grapevine cells, resulting in lower steady-state level and thus reduced translation rate. Fourth, the genetic state of the transgene(s) present in the grapevine or the N. benthamiana genome may have a significant influence on gene expression. Indeed, all the expression experiments were per-formed on R2 progeny of N. benthamiana which were homozygous for the transgene(s). In contrast, the V. rupestris lines were vegetatively propagated and were therefore hemizygous for the transgenes. This particular state might influence gene expres-sion level. Finally, the involvement of gene silenc-ing at the transcriptional or post-transcriptional level cannot be ruled out.
Transgenic expression of nepovirus CP genes has been reported in herbaceous species for five nepoviruses (ArMV [8], TRSV [4], GFLV [5], GCMV [7] and SLRV [6]. In these studies, the transgenic CP could readily be detected by ELISA in crude plant extracts of most of the transgenic lines analyzed. Interestingly, VLPs formation was 4. Discussion
In this paper, we compare the expression of a chimeric ArMV CP gene in an annual herbaceous species, N. benthamiana, and a woody perennial species,V.rupestris. Six transgenicN.benthamiana
lines and four V. rupestris lines that expressed a chimeric gene encoding the CP of the ArMV nepovirus were characterized. Southern blot analy-sis using a probe specific to the ArMV CP region confirmed that the chimeric ArMV CP gene was integrated in the N. benthamiana and V. rupestris
genomes. The number of T-DNA loci varied from one to three in transgenic N. benthamiana lines and from one to ten in transgenic V. rupestris
lines. Expression of the ArMV CP gene was demonstrated by northern blot. A mRNA corre-sponding to the ArMV CP could be detected in all the transgenic lines of N. benthamiana and V.
only demonstrated for ArMV CP expressing plants. Accumulation of nepovirus CP in grapevine species was reported for the GCMV CP [25] and the GFLV CP [10 – 12]. Krastanova et al. [10] reported the transformation of the rootstocks
V. rupestris and 110R (V. berlandieri x V. rupes
-tris), but accumulation of the GFLV CP by ELISA was demonstrated for only two plants. Mauro et al. [12] succeeded in producing a high number of independent transgenic lines of the roostocks 41B (V. 6inifera x V. berlandieri), SO4
(V. berlandieri xV. riparia) and the cultivar Char-donnay(V. 6inifera). Overall, 30% of the plants were GFLV CP negative by ELISA, whereas the presence of GFLV CP gene was demonstrated by PCR or Southern analyses. In these cases, the steady-state levels of GFLV CP mRNA accumula-tion was not verified experimentally, so it is difficult to explain the lack of GFLV CP accumu-lation. Taken together, these observations suggest that, although transgenic GFLV CP accumulation could be obtained in both herbaceous and grapevine plants, a relatively high number of grapevine plants do not produce the GFLV CP at detectable level by ELISA, which is in good agree-ment with the data described in this paper on ArMV CP accumulation in herbaceous versus grapevine tissues. In contrast, Le Gall et al. [25] reported the obtention of five lines of the grapevine rootstock 110R transformed with the GCMV CP and demonstrated the accumulation of the GCMV CP by ELISA and western blot analy-sis. In this case, accumulation levels of GCMV CP were in the same range in grapevine as in tobacco. When inoculated with ArMV, the six transgenic
N. benthamiana showed a lower percentage of infected plants compared to control plants. The resistance phenotype appeared essentially as a de-lay in infection, since most of the plants became infected after prolonged incubation (Fig. 7). There was no direct correlation between the level of ArMV CP protein accumulation and the protec-tion phenotype. Similar data were obtained.
From the results obtained with the transgenicN.
benthamiana lines, it is clear that the expression of an ArMV CP gene in the plant cell is sufficient to protect the plant against infection by ArMV, al-though this protection phenotype appeared as a delay in virus spread rather than a true resistant phenotype where the plant is immune to virus replication, as described for pathogen-derived
pro-tection based on homology-dependent gene silenc-ing [26,27]. In this case, called RNA-mediated virus resistance, both the transgene mRNA and the viral RNA are specifically degraded by an unknown cellular mechanism. The partial protec-tion observed in N. benthamiana may not be effec-tive in long-term protection of a perennial crop such as grapevine, especially if a susceptible vari-ety would be grafted onto a partially resistant transgenic rootstock. On the other hand, such protection may be sufficient to inhibit ArMV replication originating from an inoculum naturally delivered by the nematode vectorXiphinema di6er -sicaudatum. The transgenic V. rupestris lines de-scribed here are currently being tested for their protection against ArMV infection by grafting onto ArMV-infected V. rupestris plants.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Sophie-Marc-Martin and Marie-He´le`ne Prince Siegrist for their excel-lent technical support. We thank Professor E. Stutz for critical reading of the manuscript and helpful discussions. This work was supported by a grant from the Swiss National Foundation (Swiss Priority Program). A.S. was partly supported by a fellowship from the Ciba-Geigy Jubilee Founda-tion (Novartis).
References
[1] P. Powell Abel, R.S. Nelson, B. De, N. Hoffmann, S.G. Rogers, R.T. Fraley, R.N. Beachy, Delay of disease development in transgenic plants that express the to-bacco mosaic virus coat protein gene, Science 232 (1986) 738 – 743.
[2] A.F. Hackland, E.P. Rybicki, J.A. Thomson, Coat protein-mediated resistance in transgenic plants, Arch. Virol. 139 (1994) 1 – 22.
[3] D.J. Bertioli, J.I. Cooper, M.L. Edwards, W.S. Hawes, Arabis mosaic nepovirus coat protein in transgenic to-bacco lessens disease severity and virus replication, Ann. Appl. Biol. 120 (1992) 47 – 54.
[4] L.M. Yepes, M. Fuchs, J.L. Slightom, D. Gonsalves, Sense and antisense coat protein gene constructs confer high levels of resistance to tomato ringspot nepovirus in transgenic Nicotiana species, Phytopathology 86 (1996) 417 – 424.
[6] S. Kreiah, M.L. Edwards, W.S. Hawes, A.T. Jones, D.J.F. Brown, W.J. Mcgavin, J.I. Cooper, Some coat protein constituents from strawberry latent ringspot virus expressed in transgenic tobacco protect plants against systematic invasion following root inoculation by nematode vectors, Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 102 (1996) 297 – 303.
[7] V. Brault, T. Candresse, O. le Gall, R.P. Delbos, M. Lanneau, J. Dunez, Genetically engineered resistance against grapevine chrome mosaic nepovirus, Plant Mol. Biol. 21 (1993) 89 – 97.
[8] D.J. Bertioli, R.D. Harris, M.L. Edwards, J.I. Cooper, W.S. Hawes, Transgenic plants and insect cells express-ing the coat protein of arabis mosaic virus empty virus-like particles, J. Gen. Virol. 72 (1991) 1201 – 1209. [9] A. Perl, Y. Eshdat, DNA transfer and gene expression in
transgenic grapes, Biotechnol. Genet. Eng. Rev. 15 (1998) 365 – 386.
[10] S. Krastanova, M. Perrin, P. Barbier, G. Demangeat, P. Cornuet, N. Bardonnet, L. Otten, L. Pinck, B. Walter, Transformation of grapevine rootstocks with the coat protein gene of grapevine fanleaf nepovirus, Plant Cell Rep. 14 (1995) 550 – 554.
[11] B. Xue, K.S. Ling, C.L. Reid, S. Krastanova, M. Sekiya, E.A. Momol, S. Jule, J. Mozsar, D. Gonsalves, T.J. Burr, Transformation of five grape rootstocks with plant virus genes and a virE2 gene fromAgrobacterium tume-faciens, In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 35 (1999) 226 – 231.
[12] M.C. Mauro, S. Toutain, B. Walter, L. Pinck, L. Otten, P. Coutos The´venot, A. Deloire, P. Barbier, High effi-ciency regeneration of grapevine plants transformed with the GFLV coat protein gene, Plant Sci. 112 (1995) 97 – 106.
[13] P. Gugerli, Grapevine fanleaf virus, in: H.U. Bergmeyer (Ed.), Methods of Enzymatic Analysis, Antigens and Antibodies 2, vol. XI, Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, 1986, pp. 431 – 444.
[14] M. Pinck, J. Reinbolt, A.M. Loudes, M. Leret, L. Pinck, Primary structure and location of the genome-linked protein (VPg) of grapevine fanleaf nepovirus, FEBS Lett. 284 (1991) 117 – 119.
[15] G.P. Martelli, C.E. Taylor, Distribution of viruses and their nematode vectors, Adv. Dis. Vector Res. 6 (1989) 151 – 189.
[16] H. Steinkellner, G. Himmler, D. Mattanovich, H. Katinger, Nucleotide sequence of AMV-capsid protein-gene, Nucleic Acids Res. 18 (1990) 71 – 82.
[17] D.J. Bertioli, R.D. Harris, M.L. Edwards, J.I. Cooper, W.S. Hawes, Transgenic plants and insect cells express-ing the coat protein of arabis mosaic virus produce empty virus-like particles, J. Gen. Virol. 72 (1991) 1801 – 1809.
[18] A.M. Loudes, C. Ritzenthaler, M. Pinck, M.A. Serghini, L. Pinck, The 119 kDa and 124 kDa polyproteins of arabis mosaic nepovirus (isolate S) are encoded by two distinct RNA 2 species, J. Gen. Virol. 76 (1995) 899 – 906.
[19] R.A. Jefferson, T.A. Kavanagh, M.W. Bevan, GUS fu-sions: b-glucuronidase as sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants, EMBO J. 6 (1987) 3901 – 3907.
[20] R.B. Horsch, J.E. Fry, N.L. Hoffmann, D. Eichholz, S.G. Rogers, R.T. Fraley, A simple and general method for transferring genes into plants, Science 227 (1985) 1229 – 1231.
[21] M.A. Lodhi, G.N. Ye, N.F. Weeden, B.I. Reisch, A simple and efficient method for DNA extraction from grapevine cultivars and Vitis species, Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 12 (1994) 6 – 13.
[22] P. Chomczynski, N. Sacchi, Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidium thiocyanate – phenol – chlo-roform extraction, Anal. Biochem. 162 (1987) 156 – 159. [23] R. Bovey, Plant virology, in: 7th Conference on Czechoslovak Plant Virologists, High Tatras. Publ. House Slovak Acad Sci, Bratislava, 1973, p. 91. [24] M.E. Ramel, P. Serrant, P. Kulling, P. Gugerli,
Mono-clonal and polyMono-clonal antibodies for the detection of grapevine fleck associated virus, in: Extended Abstracts of the 11th Meeting ICVG, Montreux, Switzerland, 1993.
[25] O. Le Gall, L. Torregrosa, Y. Danglot, T. Candresse, A. Bouquet, Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transforma-tion of grapevine and regeneratransforma-tion of transgenic plants expressing the coat protein of grapevine chrome mosaic nepovirus (GCMC), Plant Sci. (1994) 161 – 170. [26] J.A. Lindbo, L. Silva-Rosales, W.M. Proebsting, W.G.
Dougherty, Induction of a highly specific antiviral state in transgenic plants: implications for regulation of gene expression and viral resistance, Plant Cell 5 (1993) 1749 – 1759.
[27] H.A. Smith, S.L. Swaney, T.D. Parks, E.A. Wernsman, W.G. Dougherty, Transgenic plant virus resistance me-diated by untranslatable sense RNAs: expression, regu-lation and fate of non essential RNAs, Plant Cell 6 (1984) 1441 – 1453.
