1
PT Toba Bara Sejahtra Tbk (
䇾
Toba
䇿
)
Company Presentation
April 2017
PT Toba Bara Sejahtra Tbk (
䇾
Toba
䇿
)
Company Presentation
Disclaimer
These materials have been prepared by PT Toba Bara Sejahtra Tbk (the “Company”).
These materials may contain statements that constitute forward-looking statements. These statements include descriptions regarding the intent, belief or current expectations of the Company or its officers with respect to the consolidated results of operations and financial condition of the Company. These statements can be recognized by the use of words such as “expects,” “plan,” “will,” “estimates,” “projects,” “intends,” or words of similar meaning. Such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ from those in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors and assumptions. The Company has no obligation and does not undertake to revise forward-looking statements to reflect future events or circumstances.
These materials are for information purposes only and do not constitute or form part of an offer, solicitation or invitation of any offer to buy or subscribe for any securities of the Company, in any jurisdiction, nor should it or any part of it form the basis of, or be relied upon in any connection with, any contract, commitment or investment decision whatsoever. Any decision to purchase or subscribe for any securities of the Company should be made after seeking appropriate professional advice.
Table of Contents
2
Company Profile
Performance Highlights
3
1
Strategy to Venture into Power
4
Performance Highlights
Performance Highlights
Location: Kutai, Kalimantan Timur
Hak Guna Usaha (“HGU”) covers 8,633 ha, where 2,701 ha has been planted
CPO mill ready for operation in 2016, with capacity of 30 tons FFB per hour
GLP and MCL established in February 2016 and March 2017 respectively for development of steam (coal) fired power plant project (“CFPP")with capacity of 2x50 MW each
25 year Power Purchase Agreement (“PPA”) through
Independent Power Producer (“IPP”) scheme with PLN as single offtaker
TBE established in December 2016 for investment in
power generation business 5
Toba Bara Sejahtra In Brief
Location: Kutai Kartanegara, Kalimantan Timur Total Concession: 7,087 ha
JORC-compliant proved and probable reserves of 147 MM tons and measured, indicated and inferred resources of 236 MM tons
Coal brands with mid to upper range calorific values ranging from 4,700-5,800 Kcal/kg GAR
Prime location provides operational cost edge to grow as a logistical & operational center for the area
Coal Mining
Plantation
Toba Bara Sejahtra(Toba) has 5 (“five”) subsidiaries engaged in:
Note:
1. PLN: PT Perusahaan Listrik Negara (Persero)
Ownership Structure
License
Area
Davit Togar Pandjaitan
PT Bara Makmur Abadi
PT Toba Sejahtra PT Sinergi Sukses Roby Budi Prakoso
Utama
61.79% 10.00% 6.25% 5.10%
PT Toba Bumi Energi (䇾TBE䇿)
Highland Strategic Holdings Pte. Ltd.
0.75%
• On 25thJanuary 2017, PT Toba Sejahtra(“TS”), the majority shareholder of PT Toba Bara Sejahtra Tbk(“Company”) with 71.79%
divested majority 61.79% share ownership to new shareholder, Highland Strategic Holdings Pte. Ltd. (“HSH”) • HSH is a Singapore-based investment company, mainly focused in the energy sector
• With HSH and TS sharing the same business alignment, HSH is expected to add further value to the future development of the Company
6
*) Incl. Baring Private Equity as anchor investor
90.00%
20-year Production Operation Mining Permit (䇾IUP-OP䇿) expiring in December 2029
2,990 ha
IUP-OP extension was completed in March 2013 (First out of 2 extensions: in 2023, with tenor of 10 years each)
683 ha
13-year IUP-OP expires in December 2023
3,414 ha
Plantation permit of PT Perkebunan Kaltim Utama I (PKU) expires in 2036
IUP-P for downstream processing
8,633 ha (Right to Use Land)
GLP’s PPA with PLN(1)
for 25- year contract
~60 ha
MCL’s PPA with PLN(1
for 25- year contract
~60 ha
Off-take (“take or pay”) by PLN for 25 years Planted Area: 2,701 ha Off-take (“take or pay”)
by PLN for 25 years
Reserve
Reserves: 117 MT - JORC Resources: 156 MT - JORC
Reserve: 22 MT - JORC Resources: 37 MT - JORC
Reserves : 8 MT - JORC Resources: 43 MT - JORC
Strategic Mine Locations
Muara Berau
Muara Jawa Makassar Strait
~55 km (total ~120 km)
Balikpapan
Major city to north is less than 50 km
Adjacent locations for all
3 mines
Close proximity to jetty and transhipment point
of Muara Jawa Distance from pit to jetty, with closest one ~5 km and furthest ~25
km ~5 km
IM jetty
ABN jetty
Toba owns all infrastructures (coal processing plant, overland conveyors, and jetties), giving significant operating leverage vs other concessions in surrounding areas
25 km
TMU
IMABN
TMU
Overland & Barge Loading Jetty: Speed
of 1,800 TPH High Built CPP Cap
up to 10 Mn TPA Short Coal Hauling
Distance < 5km
Hauling Road to Connect with ABN
CPP Capacity : 6 Mn
Tons/Annum (TPA) Conveyor to Jetty
Short Coal Hauling Distance ~4km
Infrastructure & Operational Capabilities
Toba’s Concessions
ROM Stockpile 8
Note:PT Adimitra Baratama Nusantara (ABN) PT Indomining (IM)
9
Performance Highlights
1Q17 Performance
–
Higher ASP Supported Margins
Operational 1Q16 1Q17 Δ%
Production Vol 1.5 1.1 (26.7)%
Sales Vol 1.4 1.1 (21.4)%
Stripping Ratio x 12.4 13.7 10.5%
Sales 63.6 62.7 (1.4)%
EBITDA(2) 11.3 17.1 51.3%
Net Profit 5.2 10.2 96.2%
Financial 1Q16 1Q17
46.8
NEWC Index 50.3 81.5 62.0%
ASP 57.2 22.2%
mn ton
EBITDA/Ton 8.3 15.7
Focused onprofitable production output based on mine plan through optimizationof :
Infrastructure and connectivity sharing
(hauling road, coal processing plants (CPP), & jetties) among Group mines
Joint mine plan between three adjacent mines and contractors(1)
Competitive coal pricing driven by strong coal branding from consistency in scheduled
delivery/product quality and securing term contracts using mostly fixed price
Diversified customer base and export market base through suitable mix between end-users and traders, and more evenly spread stable demand markets respectively
Note:
(1) As per September 2016, all three Group mines of ABN, IM, and TMU have mining contracting cooperation with Cipta Kridatama (CK) to improve further cost efficiency through economies of scale and better mine planning (2) EBITDA = Gross Profit –selling expenses –G&A + depreciation and amortization
EBITDA Margin 17.8% 27.3% US$/ton
FOB Cash Cost US$ mn 34.8 36.9 6.0%
4,1 Mt
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 est.
Toba Consolidated NEWC Price
30,1% 32,9%
5,7% 13,9% 13,5%
15,4% 15,2% marginStable
EBITDA Margin
Production Profile
11
Hauling road completed in May 2013 facilitated 2014
production ramp-up
Source: Coal price from GlobalCoal
Amidst the coal price volatility over the past several years and to sustain theCompany’s survival mode, Toba
Case study: Project
Execution
at TMU
Situation
Solution
Seize dependence on 3rd party facility and
look to internal integration via hauling road
construction to connect ABN and utilize IM’s
CPP and Jetty
Construction initiated end-2012 and targeted
for completion June 2013
Achievement
Hauling road was completed in May 2013,
ahead of schedule in June 2013
Logistics cost fell translating to lower cash
cost
Production ramp up became viable
2012-2013 Case Study: TMU
Ramp-Up in 2014
TMU was unable to boost output due to
logistical disadvantage of dependence on 3rd
party facility and subject to high tariff
Production
(Mn tons)
8.1
6.5
5.6
0.2 0.9
8.1
Hauling road completed in May 2013
2012 2013 2014
TOBA 5.6 6.5 8.1
ABN 4.4 4.2 4.4
IM 1 1.4 2.3
TMU 0.2 0.9 1.4
Quarterly Operational Performance
Quarterly Production & SR
Production in Thousand Tons
Production Summary
MT: Million Ton
1Q16 1Q17 Change Comment
Sales Volume
Sales volume tracked its 1Q17 production volume
SR edged up due to impact from mining operations during prolonged wet weather conditions
1.5 1.1
Production volume in 1Q17 was below guidance due to prolonged wet weather conditions during the period
(26.7)%
Production Volume
Production Summary
MT: Million Tons
Quarterly production volume of 1.10 mn tons in 1Q16 came in below 2017 quarterly guidance of 1.25 -1.50 mn tons
1Q17 SR rose to 13.7x from 12.6x in 4Q16 due primarily to higher than expected wet weather conditions, which impacted production
2017 guidance for SR is estimated at 12x - 13x in line with mine plan
13
1.505 1.469 1.565 1.529 1.501 1.269 1.387 1.353 1.091 12,4x 12,5x 12,0x 12,1x 12,4x 13,8x 12,8x
12,6x 13,7x
1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q16 1Q17
TOBA
Evolution of Quarterly FOB Cash Cost from 1Q13-1Q17
Quarterly FOB Cash Cost
In US$/ton
Notes:
(1) FOB Cash Cost = COGS including royalty and selling & marketing expense –depreciation and amortization
(2) Adj. FOB cash costs = COGS, including selling & marketing expense and royalty –depreciation & amortization of deferred exploration & development costs and excluding deferred stripping cost
Divergence between SR averaging at 12x - 13x and falling FOB cash cost reflect Toba operating within mine plan and more efficiently over time
14
12,7x 12,7x 13,5x
13,8x
12,5x
13,8x
12,4x 12,5x 12,0x 12,1x 12,4x
13,9x
1Q13 2Q13 3Q13 4Q13 1Q14 2Q14 3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q16 1Q17
Financial Performance
Notes: (1) FOB Cash Cost = COGS including royalty and selling expense –depreciation and amortization (2) EBITDA = Gross Profit –selling expenses –G&A + depreciation and amortization
ASP increased 22.2% y-o-y in 1Q17, while FOB cash cost only rose by 6.0% over the same period
Balance sheet position remains positive with stable cash holdings in 1Q17, while debt exposure fell due to partial loan repayment
SR edged up in 1Q17 due to higher than
normal rainy season, which impacted mining operation. 2017 production remains within guidance of 5- 6 mn tons
15 Gross profit margin, EBITDA margin, and operating margin strengthened y-o-y
resulting mainly from stronger ASP and disciplined cost management
Financial and Operational Highlights All figures are in million US$ unless otherwise stated
Balance Sheet 31 Dec 2016 31 Mar 2017 Changes
Balance Sheet
Consolidated Balance Sheet
In Million US$
Net Debt to EBITDA2)
In Million US$
Total assets remained stable from US$ 261.6 mn as at end-Dec 2016 to US$ 260.7 mn as at end-March 2017,
while total liabilities dropped 7.1%over the same period due mainly to loan repayment
Total equity value edged up by 4.8% to US$ 154.8 mn at March 2017 from US$ 147.7 mn at end-December 2016 due to increase in unappropriated earnings
Net Debt to EBITDA ratio has constantly recorded stabilityfrom quarter to quarter at < 0.5x
Note:
(1) Restated due to compliance on PSAK 24R implementation
(2) EBITDA = Gross Profit –selling expenses –G&A + depreciation and amortization 16
260.7
Total Assets 261.6 (0.3)%
Interest Bearing Debt 51.3 47.9 (6.6)%
Total Liabilities 113.8 105.8 (7.1)%
Shareholders Equity 147.7 154.8 4.8%
Balance Sheet Dec’161) Mar’17 Changes
Optimizing Selling Price & Product Quality
30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
NEWC ASP HBA
99% 97% 96%
63% 71%
1% 3% 4%
37% 29%
Traders End-users
In 2013-2015, the spread between NEWC Index and ASP narrowed due to consistent product quality, on-time
product delivery, as well as marketing initiative of selling forward to premium traders/end-customers in Japan, Korea, Taiwan, and Malaysia at predominantly fixed price
Using the same strategy in 2016 and having secured sales volume in 1H16 at fixed price, sudden jump in coal
price in 3Q16 and 4Q16 beyond market prediction was not reflected in the 2016 ASP
17
Notes:
HSis High Sulphur, max 2.0%, RSis Regular Sulphur, max 1.0%, LSis Low Sulphur, max 0.6% US$/ton
Spread between NEWC and HBA price widened significantly in last two
Diversified Export Market Base
Initiatives Undertaken:
Export Market Focus 2014-2016
Given China’s economic situation in 2015, focus shifted towards export markets whose economies showed
stable demand prospects ie. Korea, India, Taiwan, and at later stages ASEAN ie. Thailand, Malaysia, and Vietnam
Diversification towards countries ex.China remained a highlight for 2016
In 1Q17 and going forward, ASEAN markets will play more important role in sourcing coal from its proximate
supplier ie. Indonesia
18
2014 2015 2016
China Korea India Taiwan
Mid to Upper Quality Product Composition
Initiatives Undertaken:
Product Composition (GAR) 1Q17
Since 2014 until 2016, the 5600 GAR products have consistently accounted for the largest product contribution
at 50% - 70% of total sales volume
In 1Q17, the product composition varied more evenly among 4800 -5000 GAR to 5600 GAR, and to less extent
5800-5900 GAR
19
Product Composition (GAR) 2014-2016
29%
2014 2015 2016 1Q17
5600 HS 5600 RS 5800 Others
28%
4800 & 5000
Snapshot of 2017F
Operation
Prod Vol (mn ton)
SR (x) 12x - 13x
5 - 6
2015
12.3x 6.1
NEWC Coal Price (US$/ton) 59.2 66.1
Mine Plan Execution and Cost Management Discipline
2017 production and SR are targeted similar to those in 2016 of 5 - 6 million tons and 12x - 13x respectively. The Company will also maintain cash cost level similar to that achieved over the last few years through cost management initiatives
Marketing Strategy
The Company plans to continue building well-diversified market destinations and customer base, maintaining product quality and timely delivery, as well as optimizing the current favorable coal price into the Company’s ASP
Capital Expenditure
Total CAPEX for 2017 is estimated at US$ 60 - 65 million, of which 85% - 90% will be allocated for EPC phase of the power project (Sulbagut-1), with the balance for the mining business, i.e. land acquisition, and infrastructure/heavy equipment
Sourcing of Other Power Projects
In translating the Company’s vision, the Company will continuously seek for opportunities in sourcing new power projects (fossil fuel and non fossil fuel based sources) through
participation in IPP tenders as well as through acquisition of existing power assets 20
12x - 13x 5 - 6
2017 F
65 - 70
2016 E
Building, Infra, Heavy Equip
21
Performance Highlights
Performance Highlights
2
Strategy to Venture into Power
Expansion Strategy for Sustainable Growth & Value
22
2. Forward-Looking Expansion
Upstream Expansion
INTEGRATED MINING AND ENERGY COMPANY
Participate in PLN Open Tender Projects
1
Identify opportunity to develop captive Power Plant in Industrial Estate
2
Evaluate opportunity to enter Renewable-based
Power Business
3
Continuous
Operational
Efficiency
Improvement to
Sustain Margins
1. Existing Mines
Sustainability
Midstream Business
Diversification
Target coal mining company that can create synergy with TOBA coal mining assets
1
Target coal mining company with prospects to supply coal-fired
mine-mouth power plant
Rationale of Diversifying to Power Business
Mitigate Dependency on Commodity Price
Opportunity to Enter Midstream Industry in Power Generation
Capitalize on Toba Sejahtra Group’s Experience in Energy
Sector
Current coal price has decreased by ~60% since January 2011
TOBA decided to minimize dependency on coal price volatility by entering into power sector backed by stable revenue over 25 years
35 GW Power Plant Program over next 5 years opens up opportunity for private sector to enter into power sector
25 GW allocated for IPP translates to >50 tender project opportunities
This is a rare window of opportunity to tap into IPP tender projects
Toba Sejahtra group has two operating power plant companies
Power industry is believed to be resilient to economic crisis
48GW
Global Coal NEWC - US$/ton
* Recently sold to a private buyer in 4Q 2016
24
Why Toba Can Realize this Goal?
Extensive experience in executing project from greenfield to brownfield in coal mining, CFPP and gas-fired power plant development and operation
Sulbagut-1 (2x50MW) - Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) with PLN was secured in July 2016 for the next 25 years after COD (in 2020). ~97% of land area required has been secured upfront
Second 2x50MW Sulut-3 power project was secured on 7 April 2017 with expected COD in 2020 as well
Our partner (Shanghai Electric Power Construction) in Sulbagut-1 Project is well established and vastly experienced partner with proven track records in construction and operation of power plants in many countries
Having strong partners enable us to de-risk the construction phase of the projects
Substantial
Power-Related
Milestones
Have Been
Achieved
Experienced
Partners with
Proven Track
Record
Currently, Toba Sejahtra (Toba’s Shareholder) has one operating power plant asset: 2 x 41 MW Senipah Gas Power Plant, COD in Q1-2015; and previously 2 x 15 MW Palu Coal-fired Power Plant, COD in 2007 (sold in 4Q16)
Possessing vast learning curve of knowing what to and not to do in planning to execution of project management. This enables us to mitigate and minimize project risk
Leveraging
Toba Sejahtra
Toba Participation Process in IPP Tenders
IPP Tender Participation 2014-2015
• Toba has actively participated in PLN tenders including 6 IPP bidding projects initiated in 2014-2015. For gas-fired projects, Toba decided not to continue with the bidding process due to IRR calculation
• Going forward, Toba is targeting non-coal projects, including gas and renewables-based projects
25 Project Name Company Name Capacity
Toba
Stake (%) Status
Sulbagut -1 PT Gorontalo Listrik Perdana 2 x 50 80% Signed PPA in July 2016
Sulut-3 PT Minahasa Cahaya Lestari 2 x 50 90% Signed PPA in April 2017
Gas-fired Power Plant 1 x 500 5% Refrained from bidding process
Gas-fired Power Plant 1 x 250 5% Refrained from bidding process
Gas-fired Power Plant 1 x 100 24% Refrained from bidding process
PT Gorontalo Listrik Perdana (
“
GLP
”
) was established in February 2016 for the
purpose of Sulbagut-1 project
GLP is owned by consortium: PT Toba Bara Sejahtra Tbk (
“
80%
”
), and Shanghai
Electric Power Construction Co. Ltd (
“
20%
”
)
Sulbagut-1 Coal-Fired Power Project
Developer
Contract Type
Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) with PLN, signed on 14 July 2016
Independent Power Producer (
“
IPP
”
) scheme; 25-year Contract Period
Project Cost
US$ 210 - US$ 220 Mn
Progress
Project Profile
Coal-Fired Power Plant (
Location: Gorontalo Province, Sulawesi
“
CFPP
”
), 2 x 50 MW capacity
Kalimantan
Sulawesi
Sulbagut-1
Toba Concessions
26
Land acquisition already
100% completed for main
plant and ash yard
Environmental hearing
completed on 18 May 2017
EPC and Owners
Engineers under finalization
Negotiation in progress with
Banks
PT Minahasa Cahaya Lestari (
“
MCL
”
) was established in March 2017 for the
purpose of Sulut-3 project
MCL is owned by consortium: PT Toba Bara Sejahtra Tbk (
“
90%
”
), and Sinohydro
Corporation Co. Ltd (
“
10%
”
)
Sulut-3 Coal-Fired Power Project
Developer
Contract Type
Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) with PLN, signed on 7 April 2017
Independent Power Producer (
“
IPP
”
) scheme
25-year Contract Period
Project Cost
US$ 210 - US$ 220 Mn
Commitment
MCL will undergo the
process of meeting
Commencement of Work,
Financial Date and
Commercial Operation Date
as stipulated in the PPA
Project Profile
Coal-Fired Power Plant (
Location: North Sulawesi Province, Sulawesi
“
CFPP
”
), 2 x 50 MW capacity
Kalimantan
Sulawesi
Sulut-3
Toba Concessions
28
Mining EBITDA
Expected stable EBITDA from Mining Business FY2017-2020
40%-50%
50%-60%
FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020
The power business will be the main core focus of the Toba group
Mining business assumes stable international coal price, production, and cash cost until Power COD
With 2 realizable power projects slated for 2017 pipeline totaling 200 MW plus existing mine plan, Toba’s FY2017-2020 EBITDA is expected to grow by ~24-25% CAGR
Excluding other potential projects post 2017 pipeline, conservatively the power business will have contributed ~40%-50% by 2020, while also doubling Toba’s total EBITDA from current level
This implies around half of EBITDA will come from power business, where $1 of EBITDA will be valued more in the market compared to pure mining businesses
Expected EBITDA Transformation
Mining + Power EBITDA
95%-100%
200 MW realizable
Power Projects in 2017
Construction phase
Mining Business
29
Our Project Selection Process
Targeting return of equity IRR and Project IRR
Ability to identify, assess, and manage completion risk, technical and non-technical risk such as social assessment for land acquisition to ensure the project can be completed within specified time schedule
Financial capability to participate in targeted tender projects where PLN sets specific requirements to meet
Majority control for certain size of IPP projects
Appetite to have minority portion with good and credible partner in larger size projects
• Credible partner with vast experience and proven technology
• Can bring long-term value-add to organization and local people including transfer knowledge
• Have good networking capability with PLN and power stakeholders
Parameters for Project Selection
Leveraging Toba Sejahtra Group
’
s
Experience in Power Plant Development
Sumatra
Senipah Power Plant
Central Sulawesi
Palu Power Plant
PLTG Senipah
Combined Cycle System is under PPA finalization for additional 35 MW
Total potential supply: 115 MW
In operation, COD in 2007
Expansion 2x18 MW is COD 2016
Total potential supply: 66 MW
30 SULBAGUT-1
2 x 50 MW
PPA in place, in process for Financial
Close
NEW PROJECTS (Expected COD in 2020)
* Recently sold to private buyer in 4Q 2016
SULUT-3 2 x 50 MW
PPA in place, in process for Commencement of
5.5% 7.1%
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 839
186 196 200
0
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 646
702
746 779 784
Indonesian Economy & Energy Demand
Source: PLN Business Plan (RUPTL) 2016 –2025; Central Bureau of Statistics (BPS); Note: PLN is State Electricity Utility
Energy plays fundamental part in economic growth process. Economic growth needs to be supported by
sufficient Electrification Ratio (ER)
Power consumption is related to productivity level of its population. As countries switch to manufacturing-based
economies, power consumption per capita increases
GDP Growth (%)
Electricity Consumption (TWh)
Electricity Consumption per Capita (KWh)
FORECAST
Growing Power Demand
As government pushes for infrastructure & industrial development, low electricity consumption and installed capacity levels create significant upside potentials in electricity demand
Indonesia is behind its ASEAN peers in Electrification Ratio (ER)
Developed countries tend to have larger electricity consumption per capita
ASEAN Electrification Ratio Comparables
Target 2019: >95%
Energy Consumption per Capita (KWh)
Source: PLN Investor Presentation May 2015, RUPTL 2016-2025, MEMR, World Bank, Indexmundi
Government 35 GW Program
35 GW Power Projects
Coal Fired Power
Plant (CFPP) Gas & Steam Power Others
~20 GW ~7.5 GW ~6.5 GW
PLN
2 GW
IPP
18 GW
Project Costs US$ 27 –36 bln
60% 21% 19%
DEBT (Proj. Financing)
US$ 19 –25 bln
EQUITY US$ 8 – 11 bln
President Jokowi ‘s Administration committed to adding 35 GW new capacity to current installed capacity of 46 GW to increase ER from currently ~88% to >95% by after 2019
~60% of total 35 GW power projects will come from CFPP & this 35 GW require significant participation from private (IPP) at ~53% of project costs vs PLN’s portion of ~47% (inc. transmission)
IPPs (inc. CFPP) secure power purchase agreement (PPA) from PLN with typical tenor of 25-30 years
34 45 53
55 70
88
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
93 95 109
166 168 170 171 173 175 177
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
11 GW
15 GW 16 GW
20 GW 22 GW 23 GW
26 GW 27 GW
31 GW
48 GW
53 GW 54 GW 55 GW 55 GW 56 GW
58 GW
Coal Requirement for CFPP
Coal requirements for power (million tons)
Installed coal-fired power plants (GW)
CAGR: 21% CAGR: 21%
Coal consumption has increased by 21% CAGR in past five years
It is expected to continue to increase by another 21% CAGR from 2016 until 2019, if 20 GW of new CFPP
capacity from 35 GW program is installed according to plan
This assumes each MW requires 3500 - 4000 tons of coal p.a.
35 GW Electricity Program
Source: PWC Report - Supplying and Financing Coal-Fired Power Plants in the 35 GW Program, RUPTL 2016 - 2025