II. DUKUNGAN GURU DAN TEMAN SEBAYA 1. Berilah tanda √ pada kolom yang tersedia pada pilihan jawaban yang benar 2. Bacalah setiap pertanyaan dengan seksama. Pilih jawaban yang sesuai dengan sikap, pendapat, pengalaman dan kebiasaan anda NO ITEM PERTANYAAN

68 

Loading....

Loading....

Loading....

Loading....

Loading....

Teks penuh

(1)

Lampiran 2

KUESIONER

PENGARUH DUKUNGAN GURU DAN TEMAN SEBAYA TERHADAP

AKSEPTABILITAS DAN PEMANFAATAN PUSAT INFORMASI

KONSELING REMAJA (PIK REMAJA) PADA SISWA

SMU NEGRI 2 KOTA TANJUNG BALAI

TAHUN 2015

I.

KARAKTERISTIK RESPONDEN

1.

Usia

:

2.

Jenis Kelamin

:

3.

Apakah anda memiliki teman sekelompok :

YA

TIDAK

II.

DUKUNGAN GURU DAN TEMAN SEBAYA

1.

Berilah tanda √ pada

kolom yang tersedia pada pilihan jawaban yang benar

2.

Bacalah setiap pertanyaan dengan seksama. Pilih jawaban yang sesuai dengan

sikap, pendapat, pengalaman dan kebiasaan anda

NO

ITEM PERTANYAAN

YA

TIDAK

1.

Seluruh teman dalam kelompok saya memiliki jenis

kelamin yang sama dengan saya

2.

Saya dan teman kelompok memiliki hobi yang sama

3.

Saya berbagi cerita, informasi dan pengalaman pribadi

dengan teman kelompok saya

4.

Saya selalu meluangkan waktu untuk teman kelompok

saya

5.

Teman kelompok tidak pernah memanfaatkan layanan

konseling remaja di sekolah

6.

Semua anggota di kelompok teman saya sudah memiliki

pacar

7.

Memiliki kelompok teman sebaya merupakan hal yang

membanggakan bagi saya

8.

Saya lebih senang mendengarkan nasihat teman

kelompok bila dibandingkan dengan guru dan orang tua

9.

Perilaku saya dipengaruhi oleh teman kelompok

10.

Semakin banyak teman semakin besar pengaruhnya

terhadap perilaku saya

11.

Guru di sekolah sangat baik terhadap saya

(2)

meyarankan kami agar mengikuti kegiatan yang

dilakukan oleh PIK remaja

13.

Guru ikut mendukung kegiatan yang dibuat oleh

konselor di PIK remaja

14.

Guru ikut membantu untuk mengkoordinir siswa setiap

mengikuti kegiatan sosialisasi PIK remaja

15.

Guru selalu dilibatkan oleh pihak sekolah dalam

membantu siswa untuk mendapatkan informasi tentang

kesehatan reproduksi

16.

Sebaiknya guru yang menjadi konselor di sekolah

17.

semua guru selalu mendukung kegiatan PIK remaja

18.

Saya dekat dengan semua guru

19.

Ada seorang guru yang menjadi tempat curhat saya

20.

saya lebih senang curhat dengan guru atau dengan

konselor dari PIK remaja

III.

AKSEPTABILITAS TERHADAP PIK REMAJA DI SEKOLAH

1.

Berilah tanda √ pada kolom yang tersedia pada pilihan jawaban yang benar

2.

Bacalah setiap pertanyaan dengan seksama. Pilih jawaban yang sesuai dengan

sikap, pendapat, pengalaman dan kebiasaan anda.

NO

ITEM PERTANYAAN

YA

TIDAK

1.

Ruangan layanan PIK remaja disekolah seharusnya

tertutup agar tidak diketahui orang lain.

2.

Ruangan layanan PIK REMAJA disekolah sebaiknya

ditata dengan bersih dan nyaman

3.

Ruangan untuk konsultasi sebaiknya dibuat tersendiri

agar tidak didengar orang lain.

4.

Pemberi pelayanan konsultasi sebaiknya teman sebaya

(

peer group

)

5.

Saya merasa malu untuk datang ke PIK REMAJA

6.

Saya merasa takut menjadi bahan ejekan teman atau

orang lain yang saya kenal, apabila saya meminta

pelayanan kesehatan reproduksi di sekolah

7.

Saya lebih senang jika petugas pemberi layanan berjenis

kelamin sama dengan saya

8.

Petugas pemberi layanan sebaiknya seorang guru

9.

Petugas sebaiknya mendengarkan dengan penuh

perhatian saat saya menyampaikan masalah yang saya

hadapi.

(3)

IV.

PEMANFAATAN TERHADAP PIK REMAJA DI SEKOLAH

1.

Berilah tanda √ pada kolom yang tersedia pada pilihan jawaban yang benar

2.

Bacalah setiap pertanyaan dengan seksama. Pilih jawaban yang sesuai dengan

sikap, pendapat, pengalaman dan kebiasaan anda.

NO

ITEM PERTANYAAN

YA

TIDAK

1.

Apakah anda mengetahui bahwa di sekolah anda

memiliki PIK REMAJA?

2.

Pernahkah anda berkunjung dan berkonsultasi pada

petugas di PIK REMAJA?

3.

Apakah anda membutuhkan pelayanan konseling

kesehatan reproduksi?

4.

Apakah keberadaan PIK REMAJA di sekolah dapat

membantu

siswa

dalam

memberikan

informasi

kesehatan reproduksi?

5.

Apakah pelayanan yang anda terima dari petugas PIK

REMAJA sudah baik?

6.

Apakah semua materi tentang kesehatan reproduksi

yang siswa butuhkan dapat diberikan oleh petugas PIK

REMAJA?

7.

Apakah terdapat masalah pada saat anda melakukan

konsultasi pada petugas di PIK REMAJA?

8.

Apakah tempat melakukan konseling nyaman?

9.

Apakah PIK REMAJA juga memberikan informas

itentang kesehatan reproduksi melalui media cetak

(brosur, leaflet, booklet, buku

buku bacaan)?

(4)

Lampiran 3 : Hasil Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas

Reliability Dukungan Guru

Scale: ALL VARIABLES

Case Processing Summary

N

%

Cases

Valid

30

100.0

Excluded

a

0

.0

Total

30

100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in

the procedure.

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's

Alpha

N of Items

.891

10

Item Statistics

Mean

Std. Deviation

N

g1

.77

.430

30

g2

.80

.407

30

g3

.77

.430

30

g4

.70

.466

30

g5

.70

.466

30

g6

.70

.466

30

g7

.77

.430

30

g8

.83

.379

30

g9

.67

.479

30

(5)

Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if

Item Deleted

Scale Variance

if Item Deleted

Corrected

Item-Total

Correlation

Cronbach's

Alpha if Item

Deleted

g1

6.63

8.171

.629

.880

g2

6.60

8.662

.449

.892

g3

6.63

8.171

.629

.880

g4

6.70

7.941

.664

.878

g5

6.70

7.941

.664

.878

g6

6.70

8.010

.635

.880

g7

6.63

8.171

.629

.880

g8

6.57

8.323

.657

.879

g9

6.73

7.582

.792

.868

g10

6.70

8.217

.550

.886

Scale Statistics

Mean

Variance Std. Deviation N of Items

7.40

9.903

3.147

10

Reliability Dukungan Teman

Scale: ALL VARIABLES

Case Processing Summary

N

%

Cases

Valid

30

100.0

Excluded

a

0

.0

Total

30

100.0

(6)
(7)

Scale Statistics

Mean

Variance Std. Deviation N of Items

3.73

8.754

2.959

10

Reliability Akseptabilitas

Scale: ALL VARIABLES

Case Processing Summary

N

%

Cases

Valid

30

100.0

Excluded

a

0

.0

Total

30

100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in

the procedure.

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's

Alpha

N of Items

.817

10

Item Statistics

Mean

Std. Deviation

N

a1

.27

.450

30

a2

.33

.479

30

a3

.10

.305

30

a4

.30

.466

30

a5

.10

.305

30

a6

.23

.430

30

a7

.27

.450

30

a8

.23

.430

30

a9

.30

.466

30

(8)

Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if

Item Deleted

Scale Variance

if Item Deleted

Corrected

Item-Total

Correlation

Cronbach's

Alpha if Item

Deleted

a1

2.27

5.720

.541

.796

a2

2.20

5.407

.650

.783

a3

2.43

6.323

.436

.808

a4

2.23

5.702

.524

.798

a5

2.43

6.323

.436

.808

a6

2.30

5.734

.566

.794

a7

2.27

5.995

.403

.811

a8

2.30

5.872

.493

.802

a9

2.23

5.633

.558

.794

a10

2.13

5.844

.412

.812

Scale Statistics

Mean

Variance Std. Deviation N of Items

2.53

7.085

2.662

10

Reliability Pemanfaatan

Scale: ALL VARIABLES

Case Processing Summary

N

%

Cases

Valid

30

100.0

Excluded

a

0

.0

Total

30

100.0

(9)
(10)

Scale Statistics

Mean

Variance Std. Deviation N of Items

2.93

7.237

2.690

10

Lampiran 4 : Analisis Univariat

Karakteristik Responden

usia

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid 16

65

33.5

33.5

33.5

17

121

62.4

62.4

95.9

18

8

4.1

4.1

100.0

Total

194

100.0

100.0

sex

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Laki-laki

72

37.1

37.1

37.1

Perempuan

122

62.9

62.9

100.0

Total

194

100.0

100.0

T_kelompok

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Tidak

76

39.2

39.2

39.2

Ya

118

60.8

60.8

100.0

(11)

Dukungan Guru

Frequency Table

g1

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Tidak

119

61.3

61.3

61.3

Ya

75

38.7

38.7

100.0

Total

194

100.0

100.0

g2

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Tidak

78

40.2

40.2

40.2

Ya

116

59.8

59.8

100.0

Total

194

100.0

100.0

g3

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Tidak

127

65.5

65.5

65.5

Ya

67

34.5

34.5

100.0

Total

194

100.0

100.0

g4

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Tidak

87

44.8

44.8

44.8

Ya

107

55.2

55.2

100.0

(12)

g5

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Tidak

111

57.2

57.2

57.2

Ya

83

42.8

42.8

100.0

Total

194

100.0

100.0

g6

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Tidak

74

38.1

38.1

38.1

Ya

120

61.9

61.9

100.0

Total

194

100.0

100.0

g7

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Tidak

67

34.5

34.5

34.5

Ya

127

65.5

65.5

100.0

Total

194

100.0

100.0

g8

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Tidak

86

44.3

44.3

44.3

Ya

108

55.7

55.7

100.0

(13)

g9

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Tidak

80

41.2

41.2

41.2

Ya

114

58.8

58.8

100.0

Total

194

100.0

100.0

g10

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Tidak

95

49.0

49.0

49.0

Ya

99

51.0

51.0

100.0

Total

194

100.0

100.0

Kat_guru

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Kurang

106

54.6

54.6

54.6

Baik

88

45.4

45.4

100.0

Total

194

100.0

100.0

Dukungan Teman

Frequency Table

t1

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Tidak

61

31.4

31.4

31.4

Ya

133

68.6

68.6

100.0

(14)

t2

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Tidak

110

56.7

56.7

56.7

Ya

84

43.3

43.3

100.0

Total

194

100.0

100.0

t3

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Tidak

97

50.0

50.0

50.0

Ya

97

50.0

50.0

100.0

Total

194

100.0

100.0

t4

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Tidak

118

60.8

60.8

60.8

Ya

76

39.2

39.2

100.0

Total

194

100.0

100.0

t5

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Tidak

101

52.1

52.1

52.1

Ya

93

47.9

47.9

100.0

(15)

t6

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Tidak

126

64.9

64.9

64.9

Ya

68

35.1

35.1

100.0

Total

194

100.0

100.0

t7

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Tidak

114

58.8

58.8

58.8

Ya

80

41.2

41.2

100.0

Total

194

100.0

100.0

t8

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Tidak

123

63.4

63.4

63.4

Ya

71

36.6

36.6

100.0

Total

194

100.0

100.0

t9

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Tidak

128

66.0

66.0

66.0

Ya

66

34.0

34.0

100.0

(16)

t10

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Tidak

132

68.0

68.0

68.0

Ya

62

32.0

32.0

100.0

Total

194

100.0

100.0

Kat_teman

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Kurang

133

68.6

68.6

68.6

Baik

61

31.4

31.4

100.0

Total

194

100.0

100.0

Akseptabilitas

Frequency Table

a1

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Tidak

49

25.3

25.3

25.3

Ya

145

74.7

74.7

100.0

Total

194

100.0

100.0

a2

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Tidak

109

56.2

56.2

56.2

Ya

85

43.8

43.8

100.0

(17)

a3

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Tidak

48

24.7

24.7

24.7

Ya

146

75.3

75.3

100.0

Total

194

100.0

100.0

a4

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Tidak

92

47.4

47.4

47.4

Ya

102

52.6

52.6

100.0

Total

194

100.0

100.0

a5

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Tidak

88

45.4

45.4

45.4

Ya

106

54.6

54.6

100.0

Total

194

100.0

100.0

a6

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Tidak

129

66.5

66.5

66.5

Ya

65

33.5

33.5

100.0

(18)

a7

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Tidak

141

72.7

72.7

72.7

Ya

53

27.3

27.3

100.0

Total

194

100.0

100.0

a8

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Tidak

142

73.2

73.2

73.2

Ya

52

26.8

26.8

100.0

Total

194

100.0

100.0

a9

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Tidak

145

74.7

74.7

74.7

Ya

49

25.3

25.3

100.0

Total

194

100.0

100.0

a10

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Tidak

146

75.3

75.3

75.3

Ya

48

24.7

24.7

100.0

(19)

akseptabilitas

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Tidak menerima

132

68.0

68.0

68.0

Menerima

62

32.0

32.0

100.0

Total

194

100.0

100.0

Pemanfaatan

Frequency Table

p1

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Tidak

81

41.8

41.8

41.8

Ya

113

58.2

58.2

100.0

Total

194

100.0

100.0

p2

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Tidak

98

50.5

50.5

50.5

Ya

96

49.5

49.5

100.0

Total

194

100.0

100.0

p3

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Tidak

95

49.0

49.0

49.0

Ya

99

51.0

51.0

100.0

(20)

p4

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Tidak

93

47.9

47.9

47.9

Ya

101

52.1

52.1

100.0

Total

194

100.0

100.0

p5

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Tidak

80

41.2

41.2

41.2

Ya

114

58.8

58.8

100.0

Total

194

100.0

100.0

p6

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Tidak

109

56.2

56.2

56.2

Ya

85

43.8

43.8

100.0

Total

194

100.0

100.0

p7

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Tidak

100

51.5

51.5

51.5

Ya

94

48.5

48.5

100.0

(21)

p8

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Tidak

84

43.3

43.3

43.3

Ya

110

56.7

56.7

100.0

Total

194

100.0

100.0

p9

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Tidak

104

53.6

53.6

53.6

Ya

90

46.4

46.4

100.0

Total

194

100.0

100.0

p10

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Tidak

87

44.8

44.8

44.8

Ya

107

55.2

55.2

100.0

Total

194

100.0

100.0

pemanfaatan

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Tidak memanfaatkan

104

53.6

53.6

53.6

Memanfaatkan

90

46.4

46.4

100.0

(22)

Lampiran 5 : Analisis Bivariat

% within akseptabilitas

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

% of Total

68.0%

32.0%

100.0%

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 19,49.

(23)

Kat_guru * akseptabilitas

Crosstab

akseptabilitas

Total

Tidak menerima Menerima

Kat_guru

Kurang

Count

82

24

106

% within Kat_guru

77.4%

22.6%

100.0%

% within akseptabilitas

62.1%

38.7%

54.6%

% of Total

42.3%

12.4%

54.6%

Baik

Count

50

38

88

% within Kat_guru

56.8%

43.2%

100.0%

% within akseptabilitas

37.9%

61.3%

45.4%

% of Total

25.8%

19.6%

45.4%

Total

Count

132

62

194

% within Kat_guru

68.0%

32.0%

100.0%

% within akseptabilitas

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

% of Total

68.0%

32.0%

100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value

df

Asymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

9.329

a

1

.002

Continuity Correction

b

8.408

1

.004

Likelihood Ratio

9.352

1

.002

Fisher's Exact Test

.003

.002

Linear-by-Linear

Association

9.281

1

.002

N of Valid Cases

b

194

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 28,12.

(24)

Kat_teman * pemanfaatan

Crosstab

pemanfaatan

Total

Tidak

memanfaatkan

Memanfaatkan

Kat_teman

Kurang

Count

78

55

133

% within Kat_teman

58.6%

41.4%

100.0%

% within pemanfaatan

75.0%

61.1%

68.6%

% of Total

40.2%

28.4%

68.6%

Baik

Count

26

35

61

% within Kat_teman

42.6%

57.4%

100.0%

% within pemanfaatan

25.0%

38.9%

31.4%

% of Total

13.4%

18.0%

31.4%

Total

Count

104

90

194

% within Kat_teman

53.6%

46.4%

100.0%

% within pemanfaatan

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

% of Total

53.6%

46.4%

100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value

df

Asymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

4.317

a

1

.038

Continuity Correction

b

3.697

1

.055

Likelihood Ratio

4.319

1

.038

Fisher's Exact Test

.044

.027

Linear-by-Linear

Association

4.295

1

.038

N of Valid Cases

b

194

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 28,30.

(25)

Kat_guru * pemanfaatan

Crosstab

pemanfaatan

Total

Tidak

memanfaatkan

Memanfaatkan

Kat_guru

Kurang

Count

54

52

106

% within Kat_guru

50.9%

49.1%

100.0%

% within pemanfaatan

51.9%

57.8%

54.6%

% of Total

27.8%

26.8%

54.6%

Baik

Count

50

38

88

% within Kat_guru

56.8%

43.2%

100.0%

% within pemanfaatan

48.1%

42.2%

45.4%

% of Total

25.8%

19.6%

45.4%

Total

Count

104

90

194

% within Kat_guru

53.6%

46.4%

100.0%

% within pemanfaatan

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

% of Total

53.6%

46.4%

100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value

df

Asymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

.667

a

1

.414

Continuity Correction

b

.452

1

.501

Likelihood Ratio

.668

1

.414

Fisher's Exact Test

.470

.251

Linear-by-Linear

Association

.664

1

.415

N of Valid Cases

b

194

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 40,82.

(26)

Correlations

Correlations

gtot

ttot

atot

ptot

gtot

Pearson Correlation

1

.060

.299

**

-.007

Sig. (2-tailed)

.407

.000

.922

N

194

194

194

194

ttot

Pearson Correlation

.060

1

-.037

.335

**

Sig. (2-tailed)

.407

.609

.000

N

194

194

194

194

atot

Pearson Correlation

.299

**

-.037

1

-.029

Sig. (2-tailed)

.000

.609

.688

N

194

194

194

194

ptot

Pearson Correlation

-.007

.335

**

-.029

1

Sig. (2-tailed)

.922

.000

.688

N

194

194

194

194

(27)

Lampiran 6 : Analisis Multivariat

Uji Normalitas Data

NPar Tests

One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test

ttot

gtot

atot

ptot

N

194

194

194

194

Normal Parameters

a

Mean

4.23

5.23

4.39

5.22

Std. Deviation

2.508

2.238

2.348

2.934

Most Extreme

Differences

Absolute

.086

.088

.089

.092

Positive

.086

.088

.086

.081

Negative

-.075

-.088

-.089

-.092

Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z

1.196

1.224

1.243

1.279

Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)

.114

.100

.091

.076

a. Test distribution is Normal.

Multivariat

Regression

Variables Entered/Removed

b

Model

Variables

Entered

Variables

Removed

Method

1

ttot, gtot

a

. Enter

a. All requested variables entered.

b. Dependent Variable: atot

Model Summary

Model

R

R Square

Adjusted R

Square

Std. Error of

the Estimate

1

.304

a

.093

.083

2.248

(28)

ANOVA

b

Model

Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

F

Sig.

1

Regression

98.579

2

49.289

9.751

.000

a

Residual

965.427

191

5.055

Total

1064.005

193

a. Predictors: (Constant), ttot, gtot

b. Dependent Variable: atot

a. All requested variables entered.

b. Dependent Variable: ptot

(29)

ANOVA

b

Model

Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

F

Sig.

1

Regression

188.055

2

94.027

12.189

.000

a

Residual

1473.414

191

7.714

Total

1661.469

193

a. Predictors: (Constant), ttot, gtot

b. Dependent Variable: ptot

Coefficients

a

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized

Coefficients

t

Sig.

B

Std. Error

Beta

1

(Constant)

3.742

.595

6.289

.000

gtot

-.036

.089

-.027

-.399

.690

ttot

.394

.080

.337

4.936

.000

(30)

Lampiran 7 : Kanonik

Manova

- - - The default error term in MANOVA has been changed from WITHIN CELLS to WITHIN+RESIDUAL. Note that these are the same for all full factorial design s.

A n a l y s i s o f V a r i a n c e * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

178 cases accepted.

0 cases rejected because of out-of-range factor values. 16 cases rejected because of missing data.

1 non-empty cell.

1 design will be processed.

- - - Adjusted WITHIN CELLS Correlations with Std. Devs. on Diagonal

atot ptot

atot 2,26647

ptot -,00373 2,86264

- - -

Statistics for ADJUSTED WITHIN CELLS correlations

Log(Determinant) = -,00001

Bartlett test of sphericity = ,00242 with 1 D. F.

Significance = ,961

F(max) criterion = 1,59527 with (2;175) D. F.

- - - Adjusted WITHIN CELLS Variances and Covariances

atot ptot

atot 5,13687

ptot -,02421 8,19468

- - - Adjusted WITHIN CELLS Sum-of-Squares and Cross-Products

atot ptot

atot 898,95265

(31)

- - -

A n a l y s i s o f V a r i a n c e Design 1 * * * * * * * * * * * * *

EFFECT .. WITHIN CELLS Regression

Adjusted Hypothesis Sum-of-Squares and Cross-Products

atot ptot

atot 28,03611

ptot -19,11125 66,13324

- - - Multivariate Tests of Significance (S = 2, M = -1/2, N = 86 )

Test Name Value Approx. F Hypoth. DF Error DF Sig. of F Pillais ,07371 3,34842 4,00 350,00 ,010 Hotellings ,07718 3,33798 4,00 346,00 ,011 Wilks ,92736 3,34328 4,00 348,00 ,011 Roys ,05381

Note.. F statistic for WILKS' Lambda is exact.

- - - Eigenvalues and Canonical Correlations

Root No. Eigenvalue Pct. Cum. Pct. Canon Cor. Sq. Cor

1 ,05687 73,68685 73,68685 ,23197 ,05381 2 ,02031 26,31315 100,00000 ,14108 ,01990

- - - Dimension Reduction Analysis

Roots Wilks L. F Hypoth. DF Error DF Sig. of F

1 TO 2 ,92736 3,34328 4,00 348,00 ,011 2 TO 2 ,98010 3,55393 1,00 175,00 ,061

- - - EFFECT .. WITHIN CELLS Regression (Cont.)

Univariate F-tests with (2;175) D. F.

Variable Sq. Mul. R Adj. Rsq. Hypoth. MS Error MS F Sig. of F

atot ,03024 ,01916 14,01806 5,13687 2,72891 ,068 ptot ,04408 ,03316 33,06662 8,19468 4,03513 ,019

(32)

Raw canonical coefficients for DEPENDENT variables Function No.

Variable 1 2

atot -,23410 ,36907 ptot ,28642 ,18972

- - - Standardized canonical coefficients for DEPENDENT variables

Function No.

Variable 1 2

atot -,53573 ,84462 ptot ,83385 ,55235

- - - Correlations between DEPENDENT and canonical variables

Function No.

Variable 1 2

atot -,55224 ,83369 ptot ,84446 ,53562

- - - Variance in dependent variables explained by canonical variables

CAN. VAR. Pct Var DEP Cum Pct DEP Pct Var COV Cum Pct COV

1 50,90371 50,90371 2,73915 2,73915 2 49,09629 100,00000 ,97721 3,71636

- - - Raw canonical coefficients for COVARIATES

Function No.

COVARIATE 1 2

gtot -,14889 ,43896 ttot ,40973 ,16271

- - - Standardized canonical coefficients for COVARIATES

CAN. VAR.

COVARIATE 1 2

(33)

ttot ,93061 ,36957

- - - Correlations between COVARIATES and canonical variables

CAN. VAR.

Covariate 1 2

gtot -,36909 ,92939 ttot ,94701 ,32121

- - - Variance in covariates explained by canonical variables

CAN. VAR. Pct Var DEP Cum Pct DEP Pct Var COV Cum Pct COV

1 2,77945 2,77945 51,65262 51,65262 2 ,96230 3,74175 48,34738 100,00000

- - -

Regression analysis for WITHIN CELLS error term --- Individual Univariate ,9500 confidence intervals Dependent variable .. atot

COVARIATE B Beta Std. Err. t-Value Sig. of t Lower -95% CL-Upper

gtot 1618031416 ,1527312558 ,07897 2,04904 ,042 ,00596 ,31765 ttot -,0763193958 -,0757455506 ,07510 -1,01620 ,311 -,22454 ,07190 Dependent variable .. ptot

COVARIATE B Beta Std. Err. t-Value Sig. of t ower -95% CL- Upper

gtot ,0116611736 ,0086525788 ,09974 ,11692 ,907 -,18518 ,20850 ttot ,2694603936 ,2102226336 ,09486 2,84068 ,005 ,08225 ,45667

- - -

A n a l y s i s o f V a r i a n c e Design 1 * * * * * * * * * * * *

EFFECT .. CONSTANT

Adjusted Hypothesis Sum-of-Squares and Cross-Products

atot ptot

atot 234,56343

ptot 239,67718 244,90242

(34)

Test Name Value Exact F Hypoth. DF Error DF Sig. of F

Pillais ,30230 37,69586 2,00 174,00 ,000 Hotellings ,43329 37,69586 2,00 174,00 ,000 Wilks ,69770 37,69586 2,00 174,00 ,000 Roys ,30230

Note.. F statistics are exact.

- - - Eigenvalues and Canonical Correlations

Root No. Eigenvalue Pct. Cum. Pct. Canon Cor.

1 ,43329 100,00000 100,00000 ,54982

- - - EFFECT .. CONSTANT (Cont.)

Univariate F-tests with (1;175) D. F.

Variable Hypoth. SS Error SS Hypoth. MS Error MS F Sig. of F

atot 234,56343 898,95265 234,56343 5,13687 45,66269 ,000 ptot 244,90242 1434,06901 244,90242 8,19468 29,88554 ,000

- - -

EFFECT .. CONSTANT (Cont.)

Raw discriminant function coefficients Function No.

Variable 1

atot ,34343 ptot ,22032

- - - Standardized discriminant function coefficients

Function No.

Variable 1

atot ,77838 ptot ,63071

- - - Estimates of effects for canonical variables

Canonical Variable

(35)

1 2,18056

- - - Correlations between DEPENDENT and canonical variables

Canonical Variable

Variable 1

atot ,77602 ptot ,62780

(36)

-Lampiran 3 : Hasil Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

(37)

g7 6.63 8.171 .629 .880

g8 6.57 8.323 .657 .879

g9 6.73 7.582 .792 .868

g10 6.70 8.217 .550 .886

Scale Statistics

Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items

7.40 9.903 3.147 10

Reliability Dukungan Teman

Scale: ALL VARIABLES

Case Processing Summary

N %

Cases Valid 30 100.0

Excludeda 0 .0

Total 30 100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

.843 10

Item Statistics

Mean Std. Deviation N

t1 .73 .450 30

t2 .37 .490 30

t3 .33 .479 30

t4 .07 .254 30

t5 .20 .407 30

t6 .27 .450 30

t7 .53 .507 30

t8 .43 .504 30

t9 .40 .498 30

(38)

Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if Item Deleted

Scale Variance if Item Deleted

Corrected Item-Total Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted

t1 3.00 7.172 .573 .825

t2 3.37 7.137 .526 .830

t3 3.40 6.731 .721 .810

t4 3.67 8.092 .414 .840

t5 3.53 7.499 .489 .833

t6 3.47 7.430 .458 .836

t7 3.20 6.648 .706 .811

t8 3.30 7.252 .460 .837

t9 3.33 7.126 .518 .831

t10 3.33 7.057 .547 .828

Scale Statistics

Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items

3.73 8.754 2.959 10

Reliability Akseptabilitas

Scale: ALL VARIABLES

Case Processing Summary

N %

Cases Valid 30 100.0

Excludeda 0 .0

Total 30 100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

(39)

Item Statistics

(40)

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

(41)

Lampiran 4 : Analisis Univariat

Karakteristik Responden

usia

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 16 65 33.5 33.5 33.5

17 121 62.4 62.4 95.9

18 8 4.1 4.1 100.0

Total 194 100.0 100.0

sex

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Laki-laki 72 37.1 37.1 37.1

Perempuan 122 62.9 62.9 100.0

Total 194 100.0 100.0

T_kelompok

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Tidak 76 39.2 39.2 39.2

Ya 118 60.8 60.8 100.0

Total 194 100.0 100.0

Dukungan Guru

Frequency Table

g1

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Tidak 119 61.3 61.3 61.3

Ya 75 38.7 38.7 100.0

Total 194 100.0 100.0

g2

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Tidak 78 40.2 40.2 40.2

Ya 116 59.8 59.8 100.0

Total 194 100.0 100.0

g3

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Tidak 127 65.5 65.5 65.5

(42)

g2

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Tidak 78 40.2 40.2 40.2

Ya 116 59.8 59.8 100.0

Total 194 100.0 100.0

g4

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Tidak 87 44.8 44.8 44.8

Ya 107 55.2 55.2 100.0

Total 194 100.0 100.0

g5

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Tidak 111 57.2 57.2 57.2

Ya 83 42.8 42.8 100.0

Total 194 100.0 100.0

g6

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Tidak 74 38.1 38.1 38.1

Ya 120 61.9 61.9 100.0

Total 194 100.0 100.0

g7

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Tidak 67 34.5 34.5 34.5

Ya 127 65.5 65.5 100.0

Total 194 100.0 100.0

g8

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Tidak 86 44.3 44.3 44.3

Ya 108 55.7 55.7 100.0

(43)

g9

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Tidak 80 41.2 41.2 41.2

Ya 114 58.8 58.8 100.0

Total 194 100.0 100.0

g10

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Tidak 95 49.0 49.0 49.0

Ya 99 51.0 51.0 100.0

Total 194 100.0 100.0

Kat_guru

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Kurang 106 54.6 54.6 54.6

Baik 88 45.4 45.4 100.0

Total 194 100.0 100.0

Dukungan Teman

Frequency Table

t1

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Tidak 61 31.4 31.4 31.4

Ya 133 68.6 68.6 100.0

Total 194 100.0 100.0

t2

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Tidak 110 56.7 56.7 56.7

Ya 84 43.3 43.3 100.0

Total 194 100.0 100.0

t3

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Tidak 97 50.0 50.0 50.0

Ya 97 50.0 50.0 100.0

(44)

t4

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Tidak 118 60.8 60.8 60.8

Ya 76 39.2 39.2 100.0

Total 194 100.0 100.0

t5

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Tidak 101 52.1 52.1 52.1

Ya 93 47.9 47.9 100.0

Total 194 100.0 100.0

t6

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Tidak 126 64.9 64.9 64.9

Ya 68 35.1 35.1 100.0

Total 194 100.0 100.0

t7

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Tidak 114 58.8 58.8 58.8

Ya 80 41.2 41.2 100.0

Total 194 100.0 100.0

t8

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Tidak 123 63.4 63.4 63.4

Ya 71 36.6 36.6 100.0

Total 194 100.0 100.0

t9

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Tidak 128 66.0 66.0 66.0

Ya 66 34.0 34.0 100.0

(45)

t10

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Tidak 132 68.0 68.0 68.0

Ya 62 32.0 32.0 100.0

Total 194 100.0 100.0

Kat_teman

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Kurang 133 68.6 68.6 68.6

Baik 61 31.4 31.4 100.0

Total 194 100.0 100.0

Akseptabilitas

Frequency Table

a1

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Tidak 49 25.3 25.3 25.3

Ya 145 74.7 74.7 100.0

Total 194 100.0 100.0

a2

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Tidak 109 56.2 56.2 56.2

Ya 85 43.8 43.8 100.0

Total 194 100.0 100.0

a3

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Tidak 48 24.7 24.7 24.7

Ya 146 75.3 75.3 100.0

Total 194 100.0 100.0

a4

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Tidak 92 47.4 47.4 47.4

Ya 102 52.6 52.6 100.0

Total 194 100.0 100.0

(46)

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Tidak 88 45.4 45.4 45.4

Ya 106 54.6 54.6 100.0

Total 194 100.0 100.0

a6

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Tidak 129 66.5 66.5 66.5

Ya 65 33.5 33.5 100.0

Total 194 100.0 100.0

a7

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Tidak 141 72.7 72.7 72.7

Ya 53 27.3 27.3 100.0

Total 194 100.0 100.0

a8

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Tidak 142 73.2 73.2 73.2

Ya 52 26.8 26.8 100.0

Total 194 100.0 100.0

a9

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Tidak 145 74.7 74.7 74.7

Ya 49 25.3 25.3 100.0

Total 194 100.0 100.0

a10

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Tidak 146 75.3 75.3 75.3

Ya 48 24.7 24.7 100.0

(47)

akseptabilitas

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Tidak menerima 132 68.0 68.0 68.0

Menerima 62 32.0 32.0 100.0

Total 194 100.0 100.0

Pemanfaatan

Frequency Table

p1

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Tidak 81 41.8 41.8 41.8

Ya 113 58.2 58.2 100.0

Total 194 100.0 100.0

p2

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Tidak 98 50.5 50.5 50.5

Ya 96 49.5 49.5 100.0

Total 194 100.0 100.0

p3

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Tidak 95 49.0 49.0 49.0

Ya 99 51.0 51.0 100.0

Total 194 100.0 100.0

p4

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Tidak 93 47.9 47.9 47.9

Ya 101 52.1 52.1 100.0

Total 194 100.0 100.0

p5

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Tidak 80 41.2 41.2 41.2

Ya 114 58.8 58.8 100.0

Total 194 100.0 100.0

(48)

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Tidak 109 56.2 56.2 56.2

Ya 85 43.8 43.8 100.0

Total 194 100.0 100.0

p7

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Tidak 100 51.5 51.5 51.5

Ya 94 48.5 48.5 100.0

Total 194 100.0 100.0

p8

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Tidak 84 43.3 43.3 43.3

Ya 110 56.7 56.7 100.0

Total 194 100.0 100.0

p9

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Tidak 104 53.6 53.6 53.6

Ya 90 46.4 46.4 100.0

Total 194 100.0 100.0

p10

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Tidak 87 44.8 44.8 44.8

Ya 107 55.2 55.2 100.0

Total 194 100.0 100.0

pemanfaatan

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Tidak memanfaatkan 104 53.6 53.6 53.6

Memanfaatkan 90 46.4 46.4 100.0

(49)

Lampiran 5 : Analisis Bivariat

Correlations

Correlations

gtot ttot atot ptot

gtot Pearson Correlation 1 .060 .299** -.007

Sig. (2-tailed) .407 .000 .922

N 194 194 194 194

ttot Pearson Correlation .060 1 -.037 .335**

Sig. (2-tailed) .407 .609 .000

N 194 194 194 194

atot Pearson Correlation .299** -.037 1 -.029

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .609 .688

N 194 194 194 194

ptot Pearson Correlation -.007 .335** -.029 1

Sig. (2-tailed) .922 .000 .688

N 194 194 194 194

(50)

Crosstabs

Kat_teman * akseptabilitas

Crosstab

akseptabilitas

Total Tidak menerima Menerima

Kat_teman Kurang Count 91 42 133

% within Kat_teman 68.4% 31.6% 100.0%

% within akseptabilitas 68.9% 67.7% 68.6%

% of Total 46.9% 21.6% 68.6%

Baik Count 41 20 61

% within Kat_teman 67.2% 32.8% 100.0%

% within akseptabilitas 31.1% 32.3% 31.4%

% of Total 21.1% 10.3% 31.4%

Total Count 132 62 194

% within Kat_teman 68.0% 32.0% 100.0%

% within akseptabilitas 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 68.0% 32.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .028a 1 .867

Continuity Correctionb .000 1 .999

Likelihood Ratio .028 1 .867

Fisher's Exact Test .870 .496

Linear-by-Linear Association .028 1 .867 N of Valid Casesb 194

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 19,49.

(51)

Kat_guru * akseptabilitas

Crosstab

akseptabilitas

Total Tidak menerima Menerima

Kat_guru Kurang Count 82 24 106

% within Kat_guru 77.4% 22.6% 100.0%

% within akseptabilitas 62.1% 38.7% 54.6%

% of Total 42.3% 12.4% 54.6%

Baik Count 50 38 88

% within Kat_guru 56.8% 43.2% 100.0%

% within akseptabilitas 37.9% 61.3% 45.4%

% of Total 25.8% 19.6% 45.4%

Total Count 132 62 194

% within Kat_guru 68.0% 32.0% 100.0%

% within akseptabilitas 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 68.0% 32.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 9.329a 1 .002

Continuity Correctionb 8.408 1 .004

Likelihood Ratio 9.352 1 .002

Fisher's Exact Test .003 .002

Linear-by-Linear Association 9.281 1 .002 N of Valid Casesb 194

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 28,12.

(52)

Kat_teman * pemanfaatan

Crosstab

pemanfaatan

Total Tidak memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan

Kat_teman Kurang Count 78 55 133

% within Kat_teman 58.6% 41.4% 100.0%

% within pemanfaatan 75.0% 61.1% 68.6%

% of Total 40.2% 28.4% 68.6%

Baik Count 26 35 61

% within Kat_teman 42.6% 57.4% 100.0%

% within pemanfaatan 25.0% 38.9% 31.4%

% of Total 13.4% 18.0% 31.4%

Total Count 104 90 194

% within Kat_teman 53.6% 46.4% 100.0%

% within pemanfaatan 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 53.6% 46.4% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 4.317a 1 .038

Continuity Correctionb 3.697 1 .055

Likelihood Ratio 4.319 1 .038

Fisher's Exact Test .044 .027

Linear-by-Linear Association 4.295 1 .038

N of Valid Casesb 194

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 28,30.

(53)

Kat_guru * pemanfaatan

Crosstab

pemanfaatan

Total Tidak memanfaatkan Memanfaatkan

Kat_guru Kurang Count 54 52 106

% within Kat_guru 50.9% 49.1% 100.0%

% within pemanfaatan 51.9% 57.8% 54.6%

% of Total 27.8% 26.8% 54.6%

Baik Count 50 38 88

% within Kat_guru 56.8% 43.2% 100.0%

% within pemanfaatan 48.1% 42.2% 45.4%

% of Total 25.8% 19.6% 45.4%

Total Count 104 90 194

% within Kat_guru 53.6% 46.4% 100.0%

% within pemanfaatan 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 53.6% 46.4% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .667a 1 .414

Continuity Correctionb .452 1 .501

Likelihood Ratio .668 1 .414

Fisher's Exact Test .470 .251

Linear-by-Linear Association .664 1 .415

N of Valid Casesb 194

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 40,82.

(54)

Correlations

Correlations

gtot ttot atot ptot

gtot Pearson Correlation 1 .060 .299** -.007

Sig. (2-tailed) .407 .000 .922

N 194 194 194 194

ttot Pearson Correlation .060 1 -.037 .335**

Sig. (2-tailed) .407 .609 .000

N 194 194 194 194

atot Pearson Correlation .299** -.037 1 -.029

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .609 .688

N 194 194 194 194

ptot Pearson Correlation -.007 .335** -.029 1

Sig. (2-tailed) .922 .000 .688

N 194 194 194 194

(55)

Lampiran 6 : Analisis Multivariat

Uji Normalitas Data NPar Tests

One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test

ttot gtot atot ptot

N 194 194 194 194

Normal Parametersa Mean 4.23 5.23 4.39 5.22

Std. Deviation 2.508 2.238 2.348 2.934 Most Extreme Differences Absolute .086 .088 .089 .092

Positive .086 .088 .086 .081

Negative -.075 -.088 -.089 -.092

Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z 1.196 1.224 1.243 1.279

Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .114 .100 .091 .076

a. Test distribution is Normal.

Multivariat

Regression

Variables Entered/Removedb

Model Variables Entered Variables Removed Method

1 ttot, gtota . Enter

a. All requested variables entered. b. Dependent Variable: atot

Model Summary

Model R R Square Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the Estimate

1 .304a .093 .083 2.248

a. Predictors: (Constant), ttot, gtot

ANOVAb

Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

1 Regression 98.579 2 49.289 9.751 .000a

Residual 965.427 191 5.055

Total 1064.005 193

(56)

ANOVAb

Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

1 Regression 98.579 2 49.289 9.751 .000a

Residual 965.427 191 5.055

Total 1064.005 193

b. Dependent Variable: atot

Coefficientsa

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t Sig.

B Std. Error Beta

1 (Constant) 2.943 .482 6.110 .000

gtot .318 .072 .303 4.384 .000

ttot -.052 .065 -.055 -.798 .426

a. Dependent Variable: atot

Regression

Variables Entered/Removedb

Model Variables Entered Variables Removed Method

1 ttot, gtota . Enter

a. All requested variables entered.

b. Dependent Variable: ptot

Model Summary

Model R R Square Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the Estimate

1 .336a .113 .104 2.777

a. Predictors: (Constant), ttot, gtot

ANOVAb

(57)

1 Regression 188.055 2 94.027 12.189 .000a

Residual 1473.414 191 7.714

Total 1661.469 193

a. Predictors: (Constant), ttot, gtot

b. Dependent Variable: ptot

Coefficientsa

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t Sig.

B Std. Error Beta

1 (Constant) 3.742 .595 6.289 .000

gtot -.036 .089 -.027 -.399 .690

ttot .394 .080 .337 4.936 .000

(58)

Lampiran 7 : Kanonik

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * A n a l y s i s o f V a r i a n c e * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

The default error term in MANOVA has been changed from WITHIN CELLS to WITHIN+RESIDUAL. Note that these are the same for all full factorial design s.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * A n a l y s i s o f V a r i a n c e * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

194 cases accepted.

0 cases rejected because of out-of-range factor values. 0 cases rejected because of missing data.

1 non-empty cell.

1 design will be processed.

- - -

Adjusted WITHIN CELLS Correlations with Std. Devs. on Diagonal

atot ptot

atot 2,24824

ptot -,00941 2,77745

- - -

Statistics for ADJUSTED WITHIN CELLS correlations

Log(Determinant) = -,00009

Bartlett test of sphericity = ,01678 with 1 D. F. Significance = ,897

F(max) criterion = 1,52618 with (2;191) D. F.

- - -

Adjusted WITHIN CELLS Variances and Covariances

atot ptot

atot 5,05459

(59)

- - -

Adjusted WITHIN CELLS Sum-of-Squares and Cross-Products

atot ptot

EFFECT .. WITHIN CELLS Regression

Adjusted Hypothesis Sum-of-Squares and Cross-Products

atot ptot

(60)

EFFECT .. WITHIN CELLS Regression (Cont.) Univariate F-tests with (2;191) D. F. Variable Sq. Mul. R Adj. Raw canonical coefficients for DEPENDENT variables Function No. Standardized canonical coefficients for DEPENDENT variables Function No.

(61)

Variable 1 2

atot -,51085 ,85967 ptot ,87414 ,48567

- - -

Variance in dependent variables explained by canonical variables

CAN. VAR. Pct Var DEP Cum Pct DEP Pct Var COV Cum Pct COV

1 51,25504 51,25504 6,29481 6,29 481

2 48,74496 100,00000 3,99692 10,29 173

- - -

Raw canonical coefficients for COVARIATES Function No.

COVARIATE 1 2

gtot -,21738 ,39133 ttot ,36015 ,17273

- - -

Standardized canonical coefficients for COVARIATES CAN. VAR.

COVARIATE 1 2

gtot -,48647 ,87575 ttot ,90328 ,43322

- - -

Correlations between COVARIATES and canonical variables CAN. VAR.

Covariate 1 2

gtot -,43245 ,90166 ttot ,87418 ,48560

(62)

Variance in covariates explained by canonical variables

Regression analysis for WITHIN CELLS error term --- Individual Univariate ,9500 confidence intervals Dependent variable .. atot

COVARIATE B Beta Std. Err.

Dependent variable .. ptot

COVARIATE B Beta Std. Err.

Adjusted Hypothesis Sum-of-Squares and Cross-Products

(63)

Test Name Value Exact F Hypoth. DF Error

Note.. F statistics are exact. - - - Eigenvalues and Canonical Correlations Root No. Eigenvalue Pct. Cum. Pct. Canon Cor. 1 ,40641 100,00000 100,00000 ,53756

- - - EFFECT .. CONSTANT (Cont.) Univariate F-tests with (1;191) D. F. Variable Hypoth. SS Error SS Hypoth. MS Error EFFECT .. CONSTANT (Cont.) Raw discriminant function coefficients Function No.

Figur

Memperbarui...

Referensi

Memperbarui...