DAFTAR PUSTAKA. [AOAC] Association of Official Analytical Chemists Official Methods of Analylis. Volume ke-13. Washington, D.C.

(1)

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

[AOAC] Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1980. Official Methods of

Analylis. Volume ke-13. Washington, D.C.

Baldwin RL, Allison MJ. 1983. Rumen metabolism. J. Anim. Sci. 57:2209-2215. Broderick GA, Wallace RJ. 1988. Effects of dietary nitrogen source on concentrations of ammonia, free amino acids and flourescamine-reactive peptides in the sheep rumen. J. Anim. Sci. 66:2233-2238.

Buttery PJ. 1976. Protein Synthesis in the Rumen: Its Implication in the feeding of non-protein nitrogen to ruminant. Di dalam: Swan H and Broster WH, editor. Principles of Cattle Production. Butterworth, London.

Calsamiglia S, Stern MD. 1995. A three step in vitro procedure for estimating intestinal digestion of protein in ruminants. J. Anim. Sci. 73:1459-1465. Chalupa W. 1975. Amino acids nutrition in growing cattle In: Tracers studies on

NPN for ruminant II. Int. Atomic Energy Agency. Vienna, Austria.

Chapa AM et al. 2001. Influence of dietary carnitine in growing sheep fed diets containing non-protein nitrogen. Small Ruminant Res. 40:13-28.

Cheeke PR. 1998. Applied Animal Nutrition. Volume ke-2, Feed and Feeding. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.

Chen XB, Chen YK, Franklin MF, Orskov ER, Sand WJ. 1992. The effect of feed intake and body weight on purine derivative excretion and microbial protein supply in sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 70:1534-1542.

Chen XB, Gomes MJ. 1992. Estimation of Microbial Protein Supply to Sheep and Cattle Based on Urinary of Purine Derivatives: An overview of the technical

details. International Feed Resources Unit, Rowett Research Institute,

United Kingdom.

Chen XB, Hovell, DeB FD, Orskov ER, Brown DS. 1990. Excretion of purine derivatives by ruminants: effect of exogenous nucleic acid supply on purine derivative excretion by sheep. Brith J. Nutr. 63:131-142.

Chen XB, Jayasuriya MCN. 1998. Purine nitrogen index, a potentially new parameter for rapid food evaluation in ruminant. Di dalam: Deaville ER et al. editor. In vitro techniques for measurine nutrient supply to ruminants.

British Society of Anim. Sci. 22: 151-1453.

Church DC. 1979. Digestive Physiology and Nutrition of Ruminant. 2nd_Eds. John Willey and Sons, Inc. New York.

Church DC, Pond WG. 1988. Basic Animal Nutrition and Feeding. 3rd _{Ed. John} Wiley and Sons. Inc. New York, USA.

(2)

Department of Dairy Science. 1969. General Laboratory Procedure. University of Wisconsin, Madison.

Devant M, Ferret A, Calsamiglia S, Casals R, Gasa J. 2001. Effect of nitrogen source in high-concentrate, low-protein beef cattle diets on microbial fermentation studied in vivo and in vitro. J. Anim. Sci. 79:1944-1953. Erdman RA. 1988. Dietary buffering requirement of the lactating dairy cows. A.

Rieview. J. Dairy Sci. 71:3246

Erwanto, 1995. Optimalisasi Sistem Fermentasi Rumen Melalui Suplementasi Sulfur, Defaunasi, Reduksi Emisi Metan dan Stimulasi Pertumbuhan pada Ternak Ruminansia. [disertasi]. Bogor: Program Pascasarjana, Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Erwanto, Sutardi T, Sastradipradja D, Anwar Nur M. 1993. Effect of ammoniated zeolit on metabolic parameters of rumen microbes. Indon. J. Trop. Agric. 5(1):5

Fernandez JM, Sahlu T, Lu CD, Ivey D, Potchoiba MJ, 1997. Production and metabolic aspect of non-protein nitrogen incorporation in lactation ration of dairy goats. Small Ruminant. Res. 26:105-117.

France J, Siddons RC. 1993. Volatile fatty acid production. Di dalam: Forbes JM and France J, editor. Quantitative aspects of ruminant digestion and

metabolism. CAB International, Wallingford.

Habib G, Siddiqui MM, Mian FH, Jabbar J, Khan F. 2001. Effect of protein supplements of varying degradability on growth rate, wool yield and wool quality in grazing lambs. Small Ruminant Res. 41:247-256.

Haresign W, Cole DJA. 1984. Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition. Butterworths, London.

Henson JE, David JS, Harouna AM. 1997. Lactational evaluation of protein supplements of varying ruminal degradabilities. J. Dairy Sci. 80 : 385-392. Islam M et al. 2001. Energy and protein utilization by goats fed Italian ryegrass silage treated with molasses, urea, cellulase or cellulase+lactic acid bacteria. Small Ruminant Res. 42: 49-60.

Kalbande VH, Thomas CT. 2001. Effect of feeding bypass on rumen fermentation profile of crossbred cows. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 14: 974-978.

Kanjanapruthipong J, Leng RA. 1998. The effects of dietary urea on microbial populations in the rumen of sheep. Asian-Aust. J.Anim. Sci. 11:661-672. Kanjanapruthipong J, Vajrabukka C, Sindhuvanich S. 2002. Effect of formalin

treated soy bean as a source of rumen undegradable protein on rumen functions of non lactating dairy cows on concentrate based diets.

(3)

Kearl LC. 1982. Nutrient Requirements of Ruminants in Developing Countries. International Feedstuffs Institute, Utah Agricultual Experiment Station, Utah State University, Logan Utah.

Kempton TJ, Nolan JV, Leng RA. 1978. Principles for the use non-protein nitrogen and by-pass protein in diets of ruminant. Ed. Ruminant Nutrition.

World Anim. Review. 12:84-92.

Kim CH, Jong NK, Jong KH, Sang GY, Sung SL. 2004. Effects of Dietary Addition of Surfactant Tween 80 on Ruminal Fermentation and Nutrient Digestibility of Hanwoo Steers. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 3:337-342. Klusmeyer TH, McCarthy Jr RD, Clark JH. 1990. Effect of source and amount of

protein on ruminal fermentation and passage of nutrients to the small intestine of lactating cows. J. Dairy Sci. 73:3526-3534.

Kozloski GV, Ribeiro HMN, Rocha JBT. 2000. Effect of the substitution of urea for soybean meal on digestion in steer. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 80:713-719. Lee MC, Hwang SY, Chiou PWS. 2001. Application of rumen undegradable

protein on early lactating dairy goats. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 14:1549-1554.

Lehninger AL. 1993. Dasar-dasar Biokimia. Penerjemah; M. Thenawijaya, Erlangga.

Leng RA, Nolan JV. 1982. Nitrogen metabolism in rumen. J. Dairy Sci. 67:1072-1089.

Leng RA. 1991. Aplication of Biotechnology to Nutrition of Animal in Developing

Countries. FAO Animal Production and Health Paper.

Litherland AJ et al. 2000. Effect of dietary protein source on mohair growth and body weight of yearling angora doelings. Small Ruminant Res. 38:29-35. Madsen J. 1985. The basis for the proposal nordic protein evaluation system

for ruminants. The AAT-PBV System. Acta Agric. Scand. Supl. 25:9-20. Madsen J, Hvelplund T. 1985. Protein degradation in the rumen: A comparison

between in vivo, nylon bag, in vitro and buffer measurement. Acta Agric.

Scand. Supl. 25:103-125.

McAllister TA, Bae HD, Jones GA, Cheng KJ. 1994. Microbial attachment and feed digestion in the rumen. J. Anim. Sci. 72:3004-3018.

McDonald P, Edward RA, Greenhalgh JFD. 1988. Animal Nutrition. Volume ke-4. Longman Statistic and Technical John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York. Mehrez AZ, Orskov ER. 1977. A study of the artificial fiber bag tehnique for

determining the digestibility of feed in the rumen. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 88:645-650.

(4)

Mishra AS et al. 2004. Effect of sodium hydroxide plus hydrogen peroxide treated mustard (Brassica campestris) straw based diets on rumen degradation kinetics (in sacco), fermentation pattern and nutrient utilization in sheep. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 3:355-365.

Mustafa AF, McKinnon JJ, Christensen DA. 2000. Protection of canola (low glucosinolate rapeseed) meal and seed protein from ruminal degradation: Review. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci.12:535-542.

[NRC]. National Research Council. 1985. Nutrien Requirement of Domestic

Animal, Nutrient Requirement of Sheep. Volume ke-5, NAS-NRC,

Washington DC.

[NRC]. National Research Council. 1989. Nutrien Requirement of Dairy Cattle. Volume ke-6. Revised. National Academy Press, Washington DC.

[NRC]. National Research Council. 1996. Nutrien Requirement of Beef Cattle.

Update 2000. Volume ke-7. Revised. National Academy Press,

Washington DC.

Nolan JV. 1993. Nitrogen kinetics. Di dalam: JM Forbes and J France.

Quantitative Aspect of Ruminant Digestion and Metabolism. CAB

International.

Obispo NE, Dehority BA. 1999. Feasibility of using total purines as a marker for ruminal bacteria. J. Anim. Sci. 77: 3084-3095.

Ogimoto K, Imai S. 1981. Atlas of Rumen Microbiology. JSSP. Tokyo.

Orden EA et al. 2000. Leucaena leucocephala and Glirisidia sepium

supplementation in sheep fed with ammonia treated rice straw: Effect on intake, digestibility, microbial protein yield and live-weight changes.

Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 13:1659-1666.

Orskov ER. 1982. Protein Nutrition in Ruminants. Academic Press. London. Orskov ER, Grubb DA, Wenham G, Corrigall W. 1973. The sustenance of

growing and fattening ruminants by intragastric infusion of volatile fatty acids and protein. Brith. J. Nutr. 41:553-558.

Orskov ER, De Hovel FD, Mould F. 1980. The use of the nylon bag technique for evaluation of feedstuffs. Trop. Anim. Prod. 5:195-213.

Orskov ER, Ryle M. 1990. Energy Nutrition in Ruminant. Elsevier Appl. Sci London.

Owen FN, Bergen WG. 1983. Nitrogen metabolism of ruminant animals, historical, perspective, current understanding and future implication. J.

(5)

Perez JF, Ballcells J, Guada JA, Castrillo C. 1997. Rumen microbial production estimated either from urinary purine derivative excretion or from direct measurement of N-15 and purine bases as microbial markers: effect of purine source and rumen bacteria isolates. Anim. Sci. 65:225-236.

Preston TR, Willis MB. 1970. Intensive Beef Production. Oxford, Pergamon Press.

Preston TR, Leng RA. 1987. Matching Ruminant Production System with

Available Resources in the Tropics. Penambul Books, Armidale.

Puchala R, Kulasek GW. 1992. Estimation of microbial protein flow from the rumen of sheep using microbial nucleic acids and urinary excretion of purine derivatives. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 72:821-830.

Qi K, Lupton CJ, Owens EN. 1994. A review of amino acid requirements for fiber growth of sheep and angora goat. Sheep Goat Res. J. 10:160-166. Reis PJ, Sahlu T. 1994. The nutritional control of the growth and properties of

mohair and wool fibers. A comparative review. J. Anim. Sci. 72:1899-1907. Rule DC, Arnold RN, Hentges EJ, Beitz DC. 1986. Evaluation of urea dilution

technique of beef steer: Validation and published equation and comparisson with chemical composition. J. Anim. Sci. 63:1935-1946. Russel JB, Connor JDO, Fox DG, Van Soest PJ, Sniffen CJ. 1992. A net

carbohydrat and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: I Ruminal fermentation. J. Anim. Sci. 70:3551-3561.

Saricicek, BZ. . 2000. Protected (by-pass) protein and feed value of hazelnut kernel oil meal. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 1:317-322.

Satter LD, Roffler RE. 1976. Relationship between Ruminal Ammonia and Non

Protein Nitrogen Utilization by Ruminant. Tracer Studies on NPN for

Ruminant. III. IAEA, Vienna, Austria.

Satter LD, Slyter LL. 1974. Effect of ammonia concentration on rumen microbial protein production in vitro. Brith. J. Nutr. 32:199-208.

Shain DH, Stock RA, Klopfenstein TJ, Herold DW. Effect of degradable intake protein level on finishing cattle performance and ruminal metabolism. J.

Anim. Sci. 76: 242-248.

Siregar Z. 2004. Peningkatan Kinerja Pertumbuhan Domba Persilangan dan Lokal Melalui Suplementasi Hidrolisat Tepung Bulu Ayam dan Mineral Esesnsial dalam Ransum Berbasis Limbah Perkebunan. [disertasi]. Bogor: Program Pascasarjana. Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor.

Sniffen CJ, Robinson PH. 1987. Microbial growth and flow as influenced by dietary manipulations. J. Dairy Sci. 70: 425-442.

(6)

Soto RC et al. 1994. Influence of peptides, amino acids and urea on microbial activity in the rumen of sheep receiving grass hay and on the growth of rumen bacteria in vitro. Anim. Feed Sci and Tech. 49: 151-161.

Steel RGD, Torrie JH. 1980. Principle and Procedure of Statistics. McGraw-Hill Book Co. Inc. New York.

Sutardi T. 1977. Ikhtisar Ruminologi. Bahan Penataran Kursus Peternakan Sapi Perah di Kayu Ambon Lembang. BPPLP-Dit. Jend. Peternakan-FAO. Sutardi T. 1979. Ketahanan protein bahan makanan terhadap degradasi oleh

mikroba rumen dan manfaatnya bagi peningkatan produktivitas ternak.

Prosiding Seminar Penelitian dan Penunjang Peternakan, Lembaga

Penelitian dan Pengembangan, Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian, Bogor. Hal:91-103.

Sutardi T. 1980. Landasan Ilmu Nutrisi I. Ilmu Makanan Ternak. Fakultas Peternakan, Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Sutardi T. 1994. Peningkatan Produksi Ternak Ruminansia melalui Amoniasi Pakan Serat Bermutu Rendah, Defaunasi dan Suplementasi Sumber

Protein Tahan Degradasi dalam Rumen. Laporan Penelitian Hibah

Bersaing 1993/1994. Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor.

Tilley JM, Terry RA. 1969. A two stage technique or in vitro digestion of forage crops. J. Br. Grassland Society 18:104-111.

Topp JH, Elliott RC. 1965. Relationship between concentrations of ruminal nucleic acids and excretion of purine derivatives by sheep. Nature. 205:498-499.

Verbic J, Chen XB, Macleod NA, Orskov ER. 1990. Excretion of purine derivative by ruminants: Effect of microbial nucleic acid infusion on purine derivative excretion by steer. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 114:243-248.

Visek WJ. 1984. Ammonia: Its effect on biological system, metabolic hormones and reproduction. J. Dairy Sci. 67: 481-498.

Volden H. 1999. Effect of level of feeding and ruminally undegraded protein on ruminal bacterial protein synthesis, escape of dietary protein, intestinal amino acid profile and performance of dairy cows. J. Anim. Sci. 77: 1905-1918.

Wallace RJ, Cotta AM. 1988. Metabolism of Nitrogen Containing Compounds.Di dalam: Hobson PN. editor. The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem. Elsevier London.

Wanapat M, Pimpa O. 1999. Effect of Ruminal NH3-N Levels on Ruminal Fermantation, Purine Derivatives, Digestibility and Rice Straw Intake in Swamp Buffaloes. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 6:904–907.

(7)

Zain M. 1999. Substitusi Rumput dengan Sabut Sawit dalam Ransum Pertumbuhan Domba: Pengaruh Amoniasi, Defaunasi dan Suplementasi Analog Hidroksi Metionin serta Asam Amino Bercabang. [disertasi]. Bogor: Program Pascasarjana. Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Zinn RA, Owens FN, 1986. A rapid procedure for purine measurement and its use for estimating net ruminal protein synthesis. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 66:157-166.

(8)

(9)

Lampiran 1 Analisis ragam pH pada fermentasi 1 Jam in vitro Sumber Keragaman db JK KT F F0.05 F0.01 Perlakuan 5 0.004621 0.000924 2.57 2.77 4.25 35 vs 1246 1 0.003852 0.003852 10.71 4.41 8.29 3 vs 5 1 0.000450 0.000450 1.25 4.41 8.29 16 vs 24 1 0.000306 0.000306 0.85 4.41 8.29 sisa 1 0.000013 0.000013 0.03 4.41 8.29 Error 18 0.006475 0.000360 Total 23 0.011096

Lampiran 2 Analisis ragam kadar N-NH3 (mM) pada fermentasi 1 jam in vitro

Sumber Keragaman db JK KT F F0.05 F0.01 Perlakuan 5 2.53333 0.50667 6.99 2.77 4.25 1345 vs 26 1 1.96021 1.96021 27.04 4.41 8.29 15 vs 34 1 0.45563 0.45563 6.28 4.41 8.29 3 vs 4 1 0.10125 0.10125 1.40 4.41 8.29 2 vs 6 1 0.01125 0.01125 0.16 4.41 8.29 1 vs 5 1 0.00500 0.00500 0.07 4.41 8.29 Error 18 1.30500 0.07250 Total 23 3.83833

Lampiran 3 Analisis ragam kadar VFA total (mM) pada fermentasi 1 jam in vitro

Lampiran 4 Analisis ragam kadar purin (mg l-1_{) pada fermentasi 1 jam}_{in vitro}

(10)

Lampiran 5 Analisis ragam pH pada fermentasi 3 jam in vitro Sumber Keragaman db JK KT F F0.05 F0.01 Perlakuan 5 0.0181 0.0036 4.94 2.77 4.25 1356 vs 24 1 0.0108 0.0108 14.70 4.41 8.29 3 vs 156 1 0.0030 0.0030 4.09 4.41 8.29 6 vs 15 1 0.0033 0.0033 4.45 4.41 8.29 2 vs 4 1 0.0010 0.0010 1.38 4.41 8.29

sisa 1 5E-05 5E-05 0.068 4.41 8.29

Error 18 0.0132 0.0007

Total 23 0.0314

Lampiran 6 Analisis ragam kadar N-NH3 (mM) pada fermentasi 3 jam in vitro

Sumber Keragaman db JK KT F F0.05 F0.01 Perlakuan 5 5.709621 1.141924 5.03 2.77 4.25 135 vs 246 1 3.204704 3.204704 14.13 4.41 8.29 3 vs15 1 2.432067 2.432067 10.72 4.41 8.29 1 vs 5 1 0.012800 0.012800 0.06 4.41 8.29 2 vs 46 1 0.060000 0.060000 0.26 4.41 8.29 sisa 1 0.000050 0.000050 0.00 4.41 8.29 Error 18 4.083775 0.226876 Total 23 9.793396

Lampiran 7 Analisis ragam kadar VFA total (mM) pada fermentasi 3 jam in vitro

Sumber Keragaman db JK KT F F0.05 F0.01 Perlakuan 5 6825.2083 1365.0417 6.76 2.77 4.25 1234 vs 56 1 6463.5208 6463.5208 32.01 4.41 8.29 123 vs 4 1 172.5208 172.5208 0.85 4.41 8.29 13 vs 2 1 42.6667 42.6667 0.21 4.41 8.29 5 vs 6 1 144.5000 144.5000 0.72 4.41 8.29 sisa 1 2.0000 2.0000 0.01 4.41 8.29 Error 18 3634.7500 201.9306 Total 23 10459.9583

(11)

Lampiran 9 Analisis ragam pH pada fermentasi 5 jam in vitro Sumber Keragaman db JK KT F F0.05 F0.01 Perlakuan 5 0.112937 0.022587 2.83 2.77 4.25 123 vs 456 1 0.092504 0.092504 11.59 4.41 8.29 4 vs 56 1 0.017604 0.017604 2.20 4.41 8.29 13 vs 2 1 0.002204 0.002204 0.28 4.41 8.29 sisa 2 0.000625 0.000312 0.04 3.55 6.01 Error 18 0.143725 0.007985 Total 23 0.256662

Lampiran 10 Analisis ragam N-NH3 pada fermentasi 5 jam in vitro

Sumber Keragaman db JK KT F F0.05 F0.01 Perlakuan 5 0.53468 0.10694 0.53 2.77 4.25 1246 vs 35 1 0.39785 0.39785 1.97 4.41 8.29 46 vs 12 1 0.11281 0.11281 0.56 4.41 8.29 sisa 3 0.02402 0.00801 0.04 3.16 5.09 Error 18 3.62610 0.20145 Total 23 4.16078

Lampiran 11 Analisis ragam VFA total (mM) pada fermentasi 5 jam in vitro

(12)

Lampiran 13 Analisis ragam laju produksi N-NH3 (% jam-1) in vitro Sumber Keragaman db JK KT F F0.05 F0.01 Perlakuan 5 301.713 60.343 6.88 2.77 4.25 256 vs 134 1 227.612 227.612 25.96 4.41 8.29 6 vs 25 1 2.884 2.884 0.33 4.41 8.29 2 vs 5 1 19.282 19.282 2.20 4.41 8.29 14 vs 3 1 42.055 42.055 4.80 4.41 8.29 1 vs 4 1 9.879 9.879 1.13 4.41 8.29 Error 18 157.824 8.768 Total 23 459.537

Lampiran 14 Analisis ragam laju produksi VFA total (% jam-1₎_{in vitro}

Lampiran 15 Analisis ragam laju produksi purin (% jam-1₎_{in vitro}

(13)

Lampiran 16 Analisis ragam kecernaan BK (%) in vitro Sumber Keragaman db JK KT F F0.05 F0.01 Perlakuan 5 68.10398 13.62080 2.08 2.77 4.25 346 vs 125 1 51.56802 51.56802 7.86 4.41 8.29 4 vs 36 1 6.97682 6.97682 1.06 4.41 8.29 2 vs 15 1 6.30375 6.30375 0.96 4.41 8.29 1 vs 5 1 1.00820 1.00820 0.15 4.41 8.29 sisa 1 2.24720 2.24720 0.34 4.41 8.29 Error 18 118.09835 6.56102 Total 23 186.20233

Lampiran 17 Analisis ragam kecernaan BO (%) in vitro

Sumber Keragaman db JK KT F F0.05 F0.01 Perlakuan 5 46.22902 9.24580 1.41 2.81 4.34 346 vs 125 1 29.63704 29.63704 4.52 4.45 8.40 4 vs 36 1 9.76650 9.76650 1.49 4.45 8.40 2 vs 15 1 5.09682 5.09682 0.78 4.45 8.40 sisa 2 1.72866 0.86433 0.13 3.59 6.11 Error 17 86.79647 5.10567 Total 22 133.02550

Lampiran 18 Analisis ragam kelarutan protein (nilai A) in sacco

Sumber Keragaman db JK KT F F0.05 F0.01 Perlakuan 5 216.209 43.24189 53.77 3.11 5.06 135 vs 246 1 191.427 191.42722 238.02 4.75 9.33 3vs 15 1 14.045 14.04500 17.46 4.75 9.33 5 VS 1 1 1.602 1.60167 1.99 4.75 9.33 2 vs 46 1 6.601 6.60056 8.21 4.75 9.33 4 VS 6 1 2.535 2.53500 3.15 4.75 9.33 Error 11 8.846 0.80424 Total 16 225.056

(14)

Lampiran 19 Analisis ragam degradasi protein (nilai B) in sacco Sumber Keragaman db JK KT F F0.05 F0.01 Perlakuan 5 427.39111 85.47822 69.06 3.11 5.06 246 vs 135 1 399.50222 399.50222 322.78 4.75 9.33 26 vs 4 1 22.00056 22.00056 17.78 4.75 9.33 15 vs 3 1 0.84500 0.84500 0.68 4.75 9.33 1 VS 5 1 5.04167 5.04167 4.07 4.75 9.33 2 vs 6 1 0.00167 0.00167 0.00 4.75 9.33 Error 12 30.81333 2.56778 Total 17 458.20440

Lampiran 20 Analisis ragam laju degradasi protein (nilai C) in sacco

Lampiran 21 Analisis ragam potensi protein terdegradasi (nilai A+B) in sacco

Sumber Keragaman db JK KT F F0.05 F0.01 Perlakuan 5 95.0432 19.0086 6.0352 3.20 5.32 346 vs 125 1 74.7864 74.7864 23.7447 4.84 9.65 4 vs 36 1 12.0054 12.0054 3.8116 4.84 9.65 12 vs 5 1 3.3540 3.3540 1.0649 4.84 9.65 sisa 2 4.8977 2.4488 0.7775 3.98 7.21 Error 12 37.7953 3.1496 Total 17 132.8384

Lampiran 22 Analisis ragam kcernaan protein oleh pepsin HCl (%) in vitro

(15)

Lampiran 23 Analisis ragam konsumsi BK (g ekor-1_hari-1₎ Sumber Keragaman db JK KT F F0.05 F0.01 Kelompok 4 247333.53 61833.38 7.48 2.87 4.43 Perlakuan 5 52489.37 10497.87 1.27 2.71 4.10 145 vs 236 1 40406.70 40406.70 4.89 4.35 8.10 14 vs 5 1 3349.63 3349.63 0.41 4.35 8.10 23 vs 6 1 6630.53 6630.53 0.80 4.35 8.10 1 vs 4 1 4080.40 4080.40 0.49 4.35 8.10 2 vs 3 1 1345.60 1345.60 0.16 4.35 8.10 Error 20 165306.47 8265.32 Total 29 465129.37

Lampiran 24 Analisis ragam konsumsi BO (g ekor-1_hari-1₎ Sumber Keragaman db JK KT F F0.05 F0.01 Kelompok 4 223055.53 55763.883 7.41 2.87 4.43 Perlakuan 5 50959.87 10191.973 1.35 2.71 4.10 145 vs 236 1 39313.20 39313.20 5.23 4.35 8.10 14 vs 5 1 4344.03 4344.03 0.58 4.35 8.10 23 vs 6 1 5576.03 5576.03 0.74 4.35 8.10 1 vs 4 1 4840.00 4840.00 0.64 4.35 8.10 2 vs 3 1 1102.50 1102.50 0.15 4.35 8.10 Error 20 150440.47 7522.02 Total 29 424455.87

Lampiran 25 Analisis ragam konsumsi PK (g ekor-1_hari-1₎ Sumber Keragaman db JK KT F F0.05 F0.01 Kelompok 4 5392.333 1348.083 9.99 2.87 4.43 Perlakuan 5 667.767 133.553 0.99 2.71 4.10 145 vs 236 1 537.633 537.633 3.99 4.35 8.10 14 vs 5 1 40.833 40.833 0.30 4.35 8.10 23 vs 6 1 86.700 86.700 0.64 4.35 8.10 4 vs 5 1 0.100 0.100 0.00 4.35 8.10 2 vs 3 1 2.500 2.500 0.02 4.35 8.10 Error 20 2698.067 134.903 Total 29 8758.167

(16)

Lampiran 26 Analisis ragam konsumsi SK (g ekor-1_hari-1₎ Sumber Keragaman db JK KT F F0.05 F0.01 Kelompok 4 13869.000 3467.250 4.51 2.87 4.43 Perlakuan 5 5287.200 1057.440 1.38 2.71 4.10 145 vs 236 1 3674.133 3674.133 4.78 4.35 8.10 14 vs 5 1 589.633 589.633 0.77 4.35 8.10 23 vs 6 1 821.633 821.633 1.07 4.35 8.10 1 vs 5 1 16.900 16.900 0.02 4.35 8.10 3 vs 6 1 184.900 184.900 0.24 4.35 8.10 Error 20 15361.800 768.090 Total 29 34518.000

Lampiran 27 Analisis ragam kecernaan BK (%) Sumber Keragaman db JK KT F F0.05 F0.01 Kelompok 4 29.485 7.371 0.62 2.87 4.43 Perlakuan 5 89.299 17.860 1.50 2.71 4.10 1346 vs 25 1 69.123 69.123 5.80 4.35 8.10 4 vs 136 1 9.600 9.600 0.81 4.35 8.10 2 vs 5 1 10.404 10.404 0.87 4.35 8.10 1 vs 36 1 0.216 0.216 0.02 4.35 8.10 3 vs 6 1 0.064 0.064 0.01 4.35 8.10 Error 20 238.171 11.909 Total 29 356.955

Lampiran 28 Analisis ragam kecernaan BO (%) Sumber Keragaman db JK KT F F0.05 F0.01 Kelompok 4 24.970 6.243 0.62 2.87 4.43 Perlakuan 5 69.491 13.898 1.38 2.71 4.10 1346 vs 25 1 55.296 55.296 5.50 4.35 8.10 4 vs 136 1 6.801 6.801 0.68 4.35 8.10 6 vs 2 1 6.889 6.889 0.69 4.35 8.10 16 vs 3 1 0.561 0.561 0.06 4.35 8.10 1 vs 6 1 0.225 0.225 0.02 4.35 8.10 Error 20 200.934 10.047 Total 29 295.395

(17)

Lampiran 29 Analisis ragam kecernaan PK (%) Sumber Keragaman db JK KT F F0.05 F0.01 Kelompok 4 30.71470 7.6787 0.49 2.87 4.43 Perlakuan 5 98.8880 19.7776 1.27 2.71 4.10 123 vs 456 1 58.2413 58.2413 3.73 4.35 8.10 1 vs 23 1 15.2653 15.2653 0.98 4.35 8.10 5 vs 46 1 21.8453 21.8453 1.40 4.35 8.10 2 vs 3 1 1.6000 1.6000 0.10 4.35 8.10 4 vs 6 1 1.9360 1.9360 0.12 4.35 8.10 Error 20 312.6653 15.6333 Total 29 442.2680

Lampiran 30 Analisis ragam kecernaan SK (%) Sumber Keragaman db JK KT F F0.05 F0.01 Kelompok 4 579.11133 144.77783 1.26 2.87 4.43 Perlakuan 5 264.86167 52.97233 0.46 2.71 4.10 1356 vs 24 1 156.17067 156.17067 1.35 4.35 8.10 15 vs 36 1 18.43200 18.43200 0.16 4.35 8.10 2 vs 4 1 88.20900 88.20900 0.76 4.35 8.10 1 vs 5 1 1.08900 1.08900 0.01 4.35 8.10 3 vs 6 1 0.96100 0.96100 0.01 4.35 8.10 Error 20 2306.95667 115.34783 Total 29 3150.92967

Lampiran 31 Analisis ragam pH in vivo

Sumber Keragaman db JK KT F F0.05 F0.01 Kelompok 4 0.401367 0.100342 1.33 2.87 4.43 Perlakuan 5 1.392697 0.278539 3.69 2.71 4.10 123 vs 456 1 0.613470 0.613470 8.13 4.35 8.10 23 vs 1 1 0.002803 0.002803 0.04 4.35 8.10 56 vs 4 1 0.755253 0.755253 10.00 4.35 8.10 2 vs 3 1 0.000010 0.000010 0.00 4.35 8.10 5 vs 6 1 0.021160 0.021160 0.28 4.35 8.10 Error 20 1.509753 0.075488 Total 29 3.303817

(18)

Lampiran 32 Analisis ragam N-NH3 (mM) in vivo Sumber Keragaman db JK KT F F0.05 F0.01 Kelompok 4 5.90179 1.47545 0.92 2.87 4.43 Perlakuan 5 19.18304 3.83661 2.38 2.71 4.10 13 vs 2456 1 16.38038 16.38038 10.17 4.35 8.10 3 vs 1 1 0.88209 0.88209 0.55 4.35 8.10 56 vs 24 1 1.57360 1.57360 0.98 4.35 8.10 5 vs 6 1 0.33856 0.33856 0.21 4.35 8.10 2 vs 4 1 0.00841 0.00841 0.01 4.35 8.10 Error 20 32.20849 1.61042 Total 29 57.29332

Lampiran 33 Analisis ragam populasi bakteri total (109_{koloni ml}-1₎_{in vivo} Sumber Keragaman db JK KT F F0.05 F0.01 Kelompok 4 1.26548 0.31637 1.41 2.87 4.43 Perlakuan 5 3.44944 0.68989 3.07 2.71 4.10 134 vs 256 1 2.40833 2.40833 10.71 4.35 8.10 13 vs 4 1 0.39216 0.39216 1.74 4.35 8.10 26 vs 5 1 0.54945 0.54945 2.44 4.35 8.10 1 vs 3 1 0.01849 0.01849 0.08 4.35 8.10 2 vs 6 1 0.08100 0.08100 0.36 4.35 8.10 Error 20 4.49596 0.22480 Total 29 9.21088

Lampiran 34 Analisis ragam kadar purin (mg l-1₎_{in vivo} Sumber Keragaman db JK KT F F0.05 F0.01 Kelompok 4 38357.467 9589.367 0.61 2.87 4.43 Perlakuan 5 42625.067 8525.013 0.54 2.71 4.10 34 vs 1256 1 39219.267 39219.267 2.49 4.35 8.10 3 vs 4 1 1960.000 1960.000 0.12 4.35 8.10 16 vs 25 1 1185.800 1185.800 0.08 4.35 8.10 1 vs 6 1 115.600 115.600 0.01 4.35 8.10 2 vs 5 1 144.400 144.400 0.01 4.35 8.10 Error 20 315394.933 15769.747 Total 29 396377.467

(19)

Lampiran 35 Analisis ragam alantoin urin (mg ekor-1_hari-1₎_{in vivo} Sumber Keragaman db JK KT F F0.05 F0.01 Kelompok 4 59128.800 14782.200 0.43 2.87 4.43 Perlakuan 5 31438.167 6287.633 0.18 2.71 4.10 1345 vs 26 1 30016.067 30016.067 0.87 4.35 8.10 34 vs 15 1 1312.200 1312.200 0.04 4.35 8.10 2 vs 6 1 72.900 72.900 0.00 4.35 8.10 3 vs 4 1 0.900 0.900 0.00 4.35 8.10 1 vs 5 1 36.100 36.100 0.00 4.35 8.10 Error 20 691594.000 34579.700 Total 29 782160.967

Lampiran 36 Analisis ragam kadar VFA total (mM) in vivo

Lampiran 37 Analisis ragam konsentrasi C2 (mM) in vivo

(20)

Lampiran 38 Analisis ragam konsentrasi C3 (mM) in vivo Sumber Keragaman db JK KT F F0.05 F0.01 Kelompok 4 580.4138 145.1035 1.36 2.87 4.43 Perlakuan 5 1179.3493 235.8699 2.21 2.71 4.10 34 vs 1256 1 862.2250 862.2250 8.07 4.35 8.10 4 vs 3 1 287.5104 287.5104 2.69 4.35 8.10 25 vs 16 1 19.5822 19.5822 0.18 4.35 8.10 2 vs 5 1 9.6236 9.6236 0.09 4.35 8.10 1 vs 6 1 0.4080 0.4080 0.00 4.35 8.10 Error 20 2135.7182 106.7859 Total 29 3895.4814

Lampiran 39 Analisis ragam konsentrasi nC4 (mM) in vivo

Lampiran 40 Analisis ragam konsentrasi nC5 (mM) in vivo

(21)

Lampiran 41 Analisis ragam konsentrasi Iso C4 (mM) in vivo Sumber Keragaman db JK KT F F0.05 F0.01 Kelompok 4 0.89359 0.22340 1.10 2.90 4.50 Perlakuan 5 0.57875 0.11575 0.57 2.90 4.17 36 vs 1245 1 0.53016 0.53016 2.60 4.38 8.18 3 vs 6 1 0.00049 0.00049 0.00 4.38 8.18 12 vs 45 1 0.03528 0.03528 0.17 4.38 8.18 1 vs 2 1 0.00441 0.00441 0.02 4.38 8.18 4 vs 5 1 0.00841 0.00841 0.04 4.38 8.18 Error 19 3.86893 0.20363 Total 28 5.34127

Lampiran 42 Analisis ragam konsentrasi Iso C5 (mM) in vivo

Lampiran 43 Analisis ragam C2:C3 (mM) in vivo

(22)

Lampiran 44 Analisis ragam nilai NGR in vivo Sumber Keragaman db JK KT F F0.05 F0.01 Kelompok 4 1.01351 0.25338 0.83 2.87 4.43 Perlakuan 5 4.37859 0.87572 2.86 2.71 4.10 1356 vs 24 1 2.69664 2.69664 8.81 4.35 8.10 16 vs 35 1 0.25992 0.25992 0.85 4.35 8.10 2 vs 4 1 1.39129 1.39129 4.54 4.35 8.10 1 vs 6 1 0.01225 0.01225 0.04 4.35 8.10 3 vs 5 1 0.01849 0.01849 0.06 4.35 8.10 Error 20 6.12293 0.30615 Total 29 11.51503

Lampiran 45 Analisis ragam efisiensi heksosa-VFA (%) in vivo Sumber Keragaman db JK KT F F0.05 F0.01 Kelompok 4 33.0459 8.2615 1.23 2.87 4.43 Perlakuan 5 81.5820 16.3164 2.44 2.71 4.10 34 vs 1256 1 51.7267 51.7267 7.72 4.35 8.10 4 vs 3 1 26.3413 26.3413 3.93 4.35 8.10 2 vs 156 1 3.1786 3.1786 0.47 4.35 8.10 15 vs 6 1 0.1104 0.1104 0.02 4.35 8.10 1 vs 6 1 0.2250 0.2250 0.03 4.35 8.10 Error 20 133.9799 6.6990 Total 29 248.6078

Lampiran 46 Analisis ragam konsentrasi metan (mM) in vivo

(23)

Lampiran 47 Analisis ragam PBHH (g ekor-1_hari-1₎ Sumber Keragaman db JK KT F F0.05 F0.01 Kelompok 4 6844.533 1711.133 3.97 3.97 4.58 Perlakuan 5 10547.200 2109.440 4.90 2.77 4.25 134 vs 256 1 6571.200 6571.200 15.25 4.41 8.29 4 vs 13 1 3307.500 3307.500 7.68 4.41 8.29 1 vs 3 1 4.900 4.900 0.01 4.41 8.29 25 vs 6 1 554.700 554.700 1.29 4.41 8.29 2 vs 5 1 113.800 113.800 0.26 4.41 8.29 Error 18 7755.467 430.859 Total 27 25147.200 Lampiran 48 Analisis ragam retensi nitrogen (g ekor-1_hari-1₎

Lampiran 49 Analisis ragam nilai NPU (%) Sumber Keragaman db JK KT F F0.05 F0.01 Kelompok 4 513.132 128.283 5.40 2.96 4.67 Perlakuan 5 581.096 116.219 4.89 2.81 4.34 34 vs 1256 1 495.937 495.937 20.86 4.45 8.40 3 vs 4 1 3.481 3.481 0.15 4.45 8.40 15 vs 26 1 58.825 58.825 2.47 4.45 8.40 1 vs 5 1 6.724 6.724 0.28 4.45 8.40 2 vs 6 1 16.129 16.129 0.68 4.45 8.40 Error 17 404.224 23.779 Total 26 1498.452

(24)

Lampiran 50 Analisis ragam nilai BV (%) Sumber Keragaman db JK KT F F0.05 F0.01 Kelompok 4 725.6453 181.4113 2.12 2.90 4.50 Perlakuan 5 765.5817 153.1163 1.79 2.74 4.17 134 vs 256 1 650.5363 650.5363 7.60 4.38 8.18 34 vs 1 1 30.0000 30.0000 0.35 4.38 8.18 5 vs 26 1 73.6333 73.6333 0.86 4.38 8.18 3 vs 4 1 4.3560 4.3560 0.05 4.38 8.18 2 vs 6 1 7.0560 7.0560 0.08 4.38 8.18 Error 19 1626.1667 85.5877 Total 28 3117.3937

Lampiran 51 Analisis ragam pertumbuhan bulu domba (mg cm-2₎ Sumber Keragaman db JK KT F F0.05 F0.01 Kelompok 4 355.2213 88.8053 0.30 2.87 4.43 Perlakuan 5 2377.0617 475.4123 1.63 2.71 4.10 134 vs 256 1 1921.6003 1921.6003 6.58 4.35 8.10 4 vs 13 1 165.6750 165.6750 0.57 4.35 8.10 2 vs 56 1 253.4613 253.4613 0.87 4.35 8.10 1 vs 3 1 0.2250 0.2250 0.00 4.35 8.10 2 vs 5 1 36.1000 36.1000 0.12 4.35 8.10 Error 20 5843.9467 292.1973 Total 29 8576.2297

Lampiran 52 Analisis ragam deposit protein bulu (mg cm-2₎ Sumber Keragaman db JK KT F F0.05 F0.01 Kelompok 4 224.7553 56.1888 0.51 2.87 4.43 Perlakuan 5 817.9880 163.5976 1.50 2.71 4.10 134 vs 256 1 700.8333 700.8333 6.41 4.35 8.10 13 vs 4 1 49.4083 49.4083 0.45 4.35 8.10 2 vs 56 1 49.6653 49.6653 0.45 4.35 8.10 1 vs 3 1 11.0250 11.0250 0.10 4.35 8.10 5 vs 6 1 7.0560 7.0560 0.06 4.35 8.10 Error 20 2185.4887 109.2744 Total 29 3228.2320

(25)

Lampiran 53 Analisis ragam deposit air tubuh (g ekor-1 _hari-1₎ Sumber Keragaman db JK KT F F0.05 F0.01 Kelompok 4 1633.923 408.481 1.55 2.93 4.58 Perlakuan 5 6768.919 1353.784 5.12 2.77 4.25 134 vs 256 1 6052.040 6052.040 22.89 4.41 8.29 4 vs 13 1 315.576 315.576 1.19 4.41 8.29 2 vs 56 1 147.465 147.465 0.56 4.41 8.29 1 vs 3 1 1.521 1.521 0.01 4.41 8.29 5 vs 6 1 55.696 55.696 0.21 4.41 8.29 Error 18 4758.162 264.342 Total 27 13161.004

Lampiran 54 Analisis ragam deposit lemak tubuh (g ekor-1 _hari-1₎ Sumber Keragaman db JK KT F F0.05 F0.01 Kelompok 4 63.3920 15.8480 0.56 2.96 4.67 Perlakuan 5 823.4200 64.6840 5.77 2.81 4.34 456 vs 123 1 653.3333 653.3333 22.90 4.45 8.40 56 vs 4 1 130.2083 130.2083 4.56 4.45 8.40 1 vs 23 1 4.4853 4.4853 0.16 4.45 8.40 5 vs 6 1 0.0490 0.0490 0.00 4.45 8.40 2 vs 3 1 35.3440 35.3440 1.24 4.45 8.40 Error 17 484.9200 28.5247 Total 26 1378.7320

Lampiran 55 Analisis ragam deposit protein tubuh (g ekor-1 _hari-1₎ Sumber Keragaman db JK KT F F0.05 F0.01 Kelompok 4 116.54000 29.13500 1.55 2.93 4.58 Perlakuan 5 481.21067 96.24213 5.13 2.77 4.25 134 vs 256 1 430.16533 430.16533 22.93 4.41 8.29 13 vs 4 1 22.18800 22.18800 1.18 4.41 8.29 2 vs 56 1 24.66133 24.66133 1.31 4.41 8.29 1 vs 3 1 0.10000 0.10000 0.01 4.41 8.29 5 vs 6 1 4.09600 4.09600 0.22 4.41 8.29 Error 18 337.63600 18.75756 Total 27 935.38667

(26)

Lampiran 56. Analisis korelasi antar peubah in vitro, in sacco dan in vivo X1 X2 X3 X4 X1 1.00000 -0.22083 -0.50479 0.10559 0.00000 0.39440 0.03880 0.68670 X2 -0.22083 1.00000 0.12057 -0.50921 0.39440 0.00000 0.64480 0.03680 X3 -0.50479 0.12057 1.00000 0.38355 0.03880 0.64480 0.00000 0.12860 X4 0.10559 -0.50921 0.38355 1.00000 0.68670 0.03680 0.12860 0.00000 Y1 -0.27831 0.43445 0.70359 0.23045 0.27940 0.08140 0.00160 0.37350 Y2 -0.32128 0.42527 0.63256 0.30936 0.20860 0.08880 0.00640 0.22690 Y3 -0.37520 0.45323 0.72043 0.31788 0.13780 0.06770 0.00110 0.21370

(27)

Lampiran 57 Analisis regresi PBHH dengan variable X2 dan X3 Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.82859 R Square 0.68656 Adjusted R Square 0.64477 Standard Error 14.42587 Observations 18.00000 ANOVA df SS MS F Significance F Regression 2 6837.526 3418.763 16.428 0.0002 Residual 15 3121.585 208.106 Total 17 9959.111

Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95% Upper 95%

Intercept -141.0170 46.73442 -3.0174 0.0086 -240.630 -41.404

X2 26.4192 12.15998 2.1726 0.0462 0.501 52.338

X3 3.4634 0.68855 5.0300 0.0001 1.996 4.931

Lampiran 58 Analisis regresi retensi N dengan variable X2, X3 dan X4

Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.87925 R Square 0.77308 Adjusted R Square 0.72445 Standard Error 0.78481 Observations 18.00000 ANOVA df SS MS F Significance F Regression 3 29.37704 9.79235 15.898 8.71E-05 Residual 14 8.62296 0.61593 Total 17 38.00000

Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95% Upper 95%

Intercept -6.58569 2.57137 -2.56116 0.0226 -12.10074 -1.07063 X2 2.71524 0.80671 3.36579 0.0046 0.98500 4.44548 X3 0.10409 0.05047 2.06250 0.0582 -0.00415 0.21234 X4 0.17098 0.05472 3.12498 0.0074 0.05363 0.28834

(28)

Lampiran 59 Analisis regresi deposit protein tubuh dengan variable X2, X3 dan X4 Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.90202 R Square 0.81364 Adjusted R Square 0.77371 Standard Error 2.29343 Observations 18.00000 ANOVA df SS MS F Significance F Regression 3 321.507 107.1691 20.375 2.2435E-05 Residual 14 73.638 5.2598 Total 17 395.145

Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95%

Upper 95% Intercept -35.6714 7.5142703 -4.74716 0.0003 -51.78795 -19.5549 X2 9.0055 2.3574470 3.82002 0.0019 3.94926 14.0617 X3 0.4437 0.1474888 3.00809 0.0094 0.12733 0.7599 X4 0.4234 0.1598963 2.64774 0.0191 0.08042 0.7663