• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

T KIM 1302191 Bibliography

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "T KIM 1302191 Bibliography"

Copied!
9
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Rizqy Nur Sholihat, 2016

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Adisendjaja, Y.H. (2012) Kegiatan praktikum dalam pendidikan sains. (online). Tersedia:http://file.upi.edu/Direktori/FPMIPA/JUR_PEND._BIOLOGI/19 5512191980021Yusuf_Hilmi_Adisendjaja/Kegiatan_praktikum_dlm_pend ._sains.pdf. (21 Desember 2015).

Amal. (2013). Effectiveness of program based on mind habits in developing creative writing skills in poetry field for high school female students in

saudi arabia. [Online]. Prosiding Seminar. Pixel Liberia university.

Anderson, L.W., & Krathwohl, D.R. (Eds.).(2010). Kerangka landasan untuk pembelajaran, pengajaran, dan asesmen. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. Arifin, Z. (2012). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kementrian Agama RI.

Assessment Reform Group. 2002. Assessment for Learning: 10 Principles. University of Cambridge: Assessment Reform Group.

Astuti. T. Y. (2013). Perbedaan keterampilan generik sains siswa yang diajar melalui metode praktikum dengan metode demonstrasi pada konsep

jamur. Skripsi. UIN Syarif Hidayatullah.

Assessment Reform Group. (2002). Testing, Motivation and Learning. ARG-Nuffield Foundation-EPPI Centre.

Aydeniz, M., & Pabuccu, A. (2011). Understanding the impact of formatif assessment strategies on first year university students’ conceptual understanding of chemical concepts. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,5(2),18-41. Baggott, K.G dan Rayne, RC. (2007). “The Use of Computer-based Assessment

in a Field Biology Modul”. Bioscience Education e- Journal 7-7. http://www.bioscience.heacademy.ac.uk.journal/vol7/ beej-7-7.aspx. Black, P. J., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning.

(2)

Rizqy Nur Sholihat, 2016

Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B and Wiliam, D. (2004). Working Inside The Black Box: Assessment for Learning in the Classroom.

(Online). Tersedia:

http://www.defause.cse.Ucla.edu/DOCS/pb_wor_2004. (15 Februari 2015).

Carol, B. (2002). The Concept of Formative Assessment. ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation College Park MD. (Online). Tersedia: http://www.ericdigest.org/2003-3/Concept.htm. (15 Februari 2015).

Carter, C., Bishop, J. & Kravits, S.L. (2005). Keys to Effective Learning Developing Powerful Habits of Mind. Australia: Pearson Prentice Hall. Campbell, J. (2006). Theorising Habits of Mind as A Framework for Learning.

(Online). Tersedia di: http//www.aare.edu.au/06pap/cam06102.pdf. [Diakses 1 Februari 2015].

Chang, Raymond. (2004). Kimia Dasar: Konsep-Konsep Inti, Jilid 2 (Ed. Ketiga). Jakarta: Erlangga.

Costa.L, Arthur. (1988). Developing minds. Virginia: ASCD

Costa, A.L. & Kallick, B. (2000a). Describing 16 Habits of Mind. Habits of Mind: A Development Series. Alexandria, VA. (Online). Tersedia di: http://www/ccsnh.edu/documents/CCSNHMLC.Habitsofmindcostakallick Costa, A.L. & Kallick, B. (2000b). Assessing and Reporting on Habits of Mind.

Alexandria: Association For Supervision and Curriculum development. Costa, A.L. & Kallick, B. (2012).Belajar dan Memimpin dengan ‘Kebiasaan

Pikiran’ 16 Karakteristik Penting untuk Sukses.Jakarta: PT. Indeks.

de Courcy, M. & Burston, M. (2000). Learning Mathematics through French in Australia. Language and Education, 14 (2), 75-95.

Dahar, R.W. (2003). Teori-teori Belajar. Jakarta: Gelora Aksara Prima.

Doan. (2013). Is feedback a waste of time? The students’ perspective. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 1(2), 3-10.

(3)

Rizqy Nur Sholihat, 2016

Farina, Jeli. (2014). Pengaruh Penilaian Formatif Dengan Feedback Terhadap Proses Dan Hasil Belajar Pada Materi Kelarutan Dan Hasil Kali

Kelarutan. Tesis. Sekolah Pasca Sarjana UPI. Tidak diterbitkan.

Frey, N., & Fisher, D. (2013). A Formative assessment system for writing improvement. English Journal, 103(1),66-71.

Furtak, E.M. (2009). Formative assessment for secondary science teachers. Thousand Oaks: Sage Company.

Gallagher,J.J. (2007).Teaching science for understanding.New Jersey:Pearson. Gholami, V., Moghaddam, M. M. (2013). The Effect of Weekly Quizzes on

Students‘ Final Achievement Score. I.J.Modern Education and Computer Science, 1, 36-41.

Gibbs, G. and Simpson, C. (2004). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education. 1 (1),

pp.3-31. (Online). Tersedia:

http://www.glos.ac.uk/shareddata/dms/2870988BCD42A03949CBF3CB7 8A516.pdf. (16 September 2015)

Glover, C. dan Brown, E. (2006). Written Feedback for Students: too much, too detailed or too incomprehensible to be effective?. BEE-Journal Volume

7(3). (Online). Tersedia:

http://www.bioscience.heacademy.ac.uk/journal/vol7/beej-7-3.pdf. (1 Mei 2015).

Goldberg, David. (2001). Fundamentals of Chemistry (Paperback) Fifth Edition.

New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.

Gunn, A and Pitt, S.J. 2003. “The effectiveness of computer-based teaching packages in supporting student learning of Parasitology”. Bioscience

Education e-Journal. 7-7 (Online). Tersedia:

http://www.Bioscience.heacademy.ac.uk/journal/vol9/beej 7-7.aspx. Hake, R. (1999).Analyzing change/gain score. (Online). Tersedia di:

http://www.physics.indiana.edu/hake. (1 Maret 2015)

Hattie, J. & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational

(4)

Rizqy Nur Sholihat, 2016

Heritage, M., Kim, J., Vendlinski, T., & Herman, J.(2009).From evidence to action: A seamless process in formative assessment? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28(3), 24–31.

Hughes, C., & Wade, W. (1996). Inspirations for Investigation in Science.

Warwickshire: Scholastic.

Hylland, F. (1998). The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers.

Journal of Second Language Writing. 7, 255-286.

Johnson, Rutledge, dan Poppe. (2005). Habits of Mind A Curriculum for

Community High School of Vermont Students. Vermont Consultants for Language and LearningMontpelier: Vermont.

Juwah, C. (2004). Enhancing Student Learning Through Effective Formative Feedback. York, England: Higher Education Academy (Generic Centre). Kallweit I., Melle, I. (2013). Effects Of Self-Evaluation On Students’

Achievements In Chemistry Education . (Online). Tersedia: http://www.esera.org/media/esera2013/Inga_Kallweit_16Dec2013.pdf. (16 September 2015)

Kartikawati, Eka. (2013). Penerapan asesmen formatif untuk meningkatkan habits of mind dan penguasaan konsep mahasiswa pendidikan biologi. Tesis. Sekolah Pasca Sarjana UPI. Tidak diterbitkan.

Kemendikbud (2013). Modul Pelatihan Guru Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 Mata Pelajaran Kimia SMA/MA. Badan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan dan Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan.

Kunandar. (2013). Penilaian autentik (Penilaian hasil belajar peserta didik berdasarkan kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Laidler, Keith J. (1966). Principles of Chemistry. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.

(5)

Rizqy Nur Sholihat, 2016

Lawshe, C.H. (1975). A Quantitative aprroach to content validity.Personal Psychology, 28, 563-575.

Leakey, A. dan Goldsworthy, A. (2001). Fantastic Feedback Primary Science Review. 68, 22-23.

Liu, N. F. & Carless, D. (2006) Peer feedback: the learning element of peer

assessment, Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 279-290.

Lowery, L.F. (2000). NSTA Pathways to The Science Standard. Arlington: National Science Teacher Association.

LSE Teaching and Learning Centre (2012). Self- assessment and Peer Feedback (Feedback Series). The London School of Economics and Political Science is a School of the University of London.

Lu, J., & Law, N. (2012). Online Peer Assessment: Effects of Cognitive and Affective Feedback. Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 40(2), 257-275.

Marita, Rose Ash Sidiqi. (2014). Identifikasi Kemampuan Habits Of Mind Siswa Melalui Praktikum Dan Diskusi Serta Pengaruhnya Terhadap

Penguasaan Konsep Sistem Organ. Tesis. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Tidak diterbitkan.

Marzano, R.J. (1992). A Different Kind of Classroom. Teaching with Dimensions of Learning. Alexandria: ASCD (Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Marzano, R.J. (1994). Assessing Student Outcomes: Performance Asessment Using the Dimensions of Learning Model. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Marzano, RJ. (2006). Classroom Assessment & Grading That Work. Alexandria, Virginia USA.

(6)

Rizqy Nur Sholihat, 2016

Mauliyani, Ratih. (2014). Penerapan constructive feedback pada pembuatan laporan praktikum kimia sma negeri 7 pontianak. (Online). Tersedia: http://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/jpdpb/article/viewFile/6345/6523. (1 Mei 2015).

McCallum. (2000). Formative assessment: implication for classroom practice.

Whole-school development in assessment for learning: Crown. (Online). Tersedia: www.publication.education.gov.uk/default. (5 januari 2015) McDaniel, M. A., Agarwal, P. K., Huelser, B. J., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger,

H. L., III (2011). Test-Enhanced Learning in a Middle School Science Classroom: The Effects of Quiz Frequency and Placement. Journal of Educational Psychology.

Merry, S., Price, M., Carless, D., & Taras, M. (Eds.). (2013). Reconceptualising Feedback in Higher Education: Developing dialogue with students. London and New York: Routledge.

Moore. J.W. dan Davies, W. G. (1978). Chemsistry International Student Edition.

Tokyo: Mc.Graw – Hill Kogakusha, LTD.

Mui SO, W. W. (2004). Formative and Summative Assessment Different Strategies for The Assessment. Different Strategies for The Assessment. The Important Qualitity Meaningful Assessment. Asia-Pasific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 5(2), Artikel 8.

Mulyasa, E. (2013). Pengembangan dan implementasi kurikulum 2013.Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

O’Connor, Raymond F. (1974). Chemical Principles and Their Biological Implication. California: Hamilton Publishing Company.

Perros. (1967). Chemisrty. New York: Americam Book Company.

Popham, W.J. (1995). Classroom Assessment, What Teachers Need it Know. Oxford: Pergamon Press

Popham, W.J. (2011). Classroom Assessment What Teachers Need to Know.

(7)

Rizqy Nur Sholihat, 2016

Popham & Shepard. (2006). Makalah diinterpretasikan di FAT SCASS di Austin

tanggal 10 Oktober 2006. (Online). Tersedia: www.republicschools.org/docs/accountability/.../fastattributes04081. [Diakses 1 September 2015].

Purwanto, M. N. (2009). Prinsip-prinsip dan teknik evaluasi pengajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Ramaprasad, A. (1983). On the The Definition of Feedback. Behavioral Science.

28 (1). 4-13.

Roediger H.L., Putnam A.L., Smith M. A. (2011). Ten Benefits of Testing and Their Applications to Educational Practice. Psychology of Learning and Motivation. 55, 1-36.

Rosenberg, Jerome I. (1983). Theory and Problems of College Chemistry Sixth Edition. Singapura: Mc.Graw-Hill Internationa Book Company.

Rustaman, N. Y. dkk. (2005). Strategi belajar mengajar biologi. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.

Rustaman, N. Y. (2008). Kebiasaan berpikir dalam pembelajaran sains dan

asesmennya. [Online]. Tersedia di:

http://file.upi.edu/Direktori/FPMIPA/JUR._PEND._BIOLOGI/195012311 979032-Nuryani_Rustaman/KDBI_dalamDIKSainsFINAL.pdf. Tersedia 15 September 2015.

Sastrohamidjojo, Hardjono. (2001). Kimia Dasar. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Sadler, R. (1989). Formative Assessment and The Design of Instructional Systems. Instructional Science. 18, 119-144.

Scott, P., Mortimer, E., & Aguiar, O. (2006). The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: a fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons. Science Education, 90, 605-631.

Scubert, Leo, Veguilla, Luis A. dan Berdecia. (1972). Chemistry and Society.

(8)

Rizqy Nur Sholihat, 2016

Shepardson. D. P. (1997). Butterflies and Bettles: First Graders Ways of Seeing and Talking about Insect Life Cycles. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 34(9), 876-889.

Shepardson. D. P. & Britsch, S. (1997). Children’s Science Journal: Tools for Teaching, Learning and Assessing. Science and Children. 34 (5), 13-17. Silverius. (1991). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar dan Umpan Balik. Jakarta: PT.

Grasindo.

Sorum. (1964). General Chemistry Second Edition. London: Prentice-Hall International.

Sriyati, S. (2011). Peran Asesmen Formatif dalam Membentuk Habits of Mind Mahasiswa Biologi. Disertasi. Sekolah Pasca Sarjana UPI. Tidak diterbitkan.

Surapranata, S. (2009). Analisis, validitas, reliabilitas,dan interpretasi hasil tes, implementasi kurikulum 2004. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Thin, A.G. (2006). “Using online microassessment to Drive Student Learning”.

Bioscience Education e-Journal. 7-7 (Online). Tersedia: http://www.Bioscience.heacademy.ac.uk/journal/vol9/beej 7-7.aspx. Topping, K. J. (2009). Peer Assessment. Theory Into Practice, 48(1), 20-27. Uagliano, James. (1979). Answer to Problems for Chemistry. New York:

Prentice-Hall Inc.

Wandersee, J. H. , Mintzes, J. J. & Novak, J.D. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science. In D.L. Gabel (Ed) Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning.

Wiggins, G. (1984). A True Test: Toward More Authentic and Equitable Assessment. Phi Delta Kappan 70, (9) 703-713.

Yahya, A. K. E., & Nasser, E. (2013). Assesing Secondary School Teachers Performance in Developing Habits of Mind For the Students. International Interdiciplinary Journal of Education, 2(2), 168-180.

Yunita. 2011. Asam Basa. Bandung: CV. Insan Mandiri.

(9)

Rizqy Nur Sholihat, 2016

Ziman, M. et al. (2007). Student optimism and appreciation of feedback. Teaching and Learning Forum 2007.

Ziv, A.K., Lehrer K., Schmid H. B. (2011). Self-Evaluation: Affective and Social Grounds of Intentionality. London New York: Springer.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Weerd, I., 2005, Wem : A Desain CMSbased Implementasi Method untuk Web, lembaga informasi dan ilmu komputer , Universitas Utrecht, laporan teknis. Universitas

Penelitian ini menerapkan pendekatan modular layout yang menggunakan string matching dan clustering untuk mengelompokan mesin dan menganalisa kesamaan routing operasi yang bervariasi

Melihat banyaknya motif yang menghiasi bangunan masjid Al-Bantani, terutama pada bagian Interior sehingga menarik perhatian penulis untuk mengetahui penerapan motif

Pada tulisan ini, dibahas keterkaitan antara representasi quiver tak terdekomposisi dengan diagram Dynkin sehingga dapat ditunjukkan syarat perlu dan syarat cukup agar

This Scription is titled "The Response Of Participants Intitution Of Sosial Security (BPJS) Independent Health to Health Service in Batubara Regional Public Hospital

Dari permasalahan diatas dapat dilihat , bahwa sangat diperlukan sekali suatu cara untuk pencarian data lebih cepat. sehingga dibutuhkan suatu perangkat lunak (software) yang

Penelitian yang telah dilakukan dan hasil penelitian sebelumnya yang mendukung yakni terdapat hubungan yang signifikan antara tekanan darah dengan kejadian stroke

b.  bahwa  sesuai  dengan  ketentuan  Undang­Undang  Nop:lOr  10  Tahun  2008  tentang  Pemilihan  Umum  Anggota  · Dewan  Perwakilan  Rakyat,  Dewan  Perwakilan