C O R I N A D. S. R I A N T O P U T R A
Best practice to publish
your research
Teachings (selected)
Universitas Indonesia:
Academic writing for doctoral students Thesis proposal for master students.
Scale construction and report writing for bachelor –
KKI students.
Industrial / Organizational Psychology for bachelor
students.
University of New South Wales:
Management of Organizational Behavior Cross cultural management
Publications (selected)
Riantoputra, C. D., & Gatari, E., (in press). Women Leaders in Indonesia: Current
Pictures and Strategies for Improvement, Y. Cho, R, Gosh, J. Sun, & G. Clean, (eds.),
Asian Women in Leadership, Palgrave Macmilan.
Riantoputra, C. D., Bastaman, A., & Duarsa, H. C. (in press), Positive identity as a
leader in Indonesia: It is your trait that count, not your gender., in Visions from
Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Proceeding of the Asia-Pacific Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, Depok – Indonesia.
Riantoputra, Corina D., Pamungkas, C.A., & Respati, A. (2013). The relationship
between perceived contract breach and job insecurity: The role of perceived
organizational support as a moderator. Paper presented at the European Association of Work and Organizational Psychology (EAWOP), Munster Germany, 22nd – 25th May.
Note: This conference is an A class conference in Organizational Behavior.
Munawaroh, Azizatul, Riantoputra, Corina D., & Marpaung, Sally B. (2013). Factors
influencing individual performance in an Indonesian Government Office., South East Asian Journal of Management, vol 7 (2), 51-60.
Publications (selected)
Riantoputra, C. D., (2011). When you think you’re smart, you’re dead:
Resiliency and Learning. Paper presented at the Psychology EXPO: Mempersiapkan Sumber Daya Manusia Dalam Menghadapi Tantangan Perubahan, Jakarta, 20 Sept.
Riantoputra, C. D., (2011). Different paths to understanding: How intuitive
and analytic thinking affect executive’s interpretation. Paper presented at the Cognition in the Rough, the Academy of Management Meeting, San Antonio, Texas, 12th – 16th August.
Note: This is a top conference in Organizational Behavior.
Riantoputra, C. D., (2010). Know thyself: Examining factors that influence
the activation of organizational identity concepts in top managers’ minds, Group & Organization Management, 35, 8-38.
Note: This journal is an A class international journal for Applied
Psychology (IF: 2.4). The paper is one of the top three most down-loaded
papers published by Sage in 2009 / 2010 (see
Academy of Management Scholars
Association
European Association of Work &
Organizational Psychology.
International Leadership Association
Chief Editor: Makara: HUBS Asia
www.hubsasia.ui.ac.id
Internasional jurnal terindex Thompson Reuters (ESCI) Jurnal nasional terakreditasi - Diknas
Key ingredients to publish your
research
SIGNIFICANCE
SUBSTANCE
CRAFTMANSHI
P
ATTITUDES
SIGNIFICANCE
Artikel yang baik, berciri:
Menghadirkan sesuatu yang baru, inovatif
dan/atau kreatif.
Artinya, artikel yang baik adalah artikel yang
berhasil berargumen bahwa (1) masalah
penelitiannya
penting
untuk diketahui dan (2)
sejauh ini,
teori belum berhasil menjelaskan
dengan baik
masalah penelitian tsb.
Significance - latihan
Apakah ini topik riset yang layak diteliti /
dipublikasi?
Bullying di SMP N di kecamatan Bojong Gede. Sikap polisi terhadap suap
Perlawanan masyarakat Riau terhadap perusahaan
minyak.
Gaya kepemimpinan CEO bank
Bagaimana membuat topik-topik ini layak diteliti / dipublikasi?
SIGNIFICANCE:
Apakah masalah berikut layak untuk diteliti?
Mengapa frekuensi terjadinya bullying di
SMP N di kecamatan Bojong Gede 5 kali
lipat dari SMP lain?
Bagaimanakah meningkatkan sikap tegas
polisi terhadap usaha suap dari
masyarakat?
Significance - latihan
Berdasarkan kriteria berikut:
Apakah problem yang ingin dijawab?
Apakah problem tsb penting untuk dijawab?
Apakah sudah ada riset sebelum ini?
Apakah sudah ada teori yang bisa menjelaskan?
Apa bedanya gejala yang ingin diteliti, dengan teori yang sudah ada?
Apakah ini topik riset yang layak diteliti?
Bullying di SMP N di kecamatan saya. Sikap polisi terhadap suap
Perlawanan masyarakat Riau terhadap perusahaan minyak Gaya kepemimpinan CEO bank
Integrasikan & sintesakan literatur reviu
Integrasikan hasil dari literature reviu.
Temukan BIG PICTURE-nya.
Identifikasi variabel-nya (faktor yang mempengaruhi,
konteks, dst)
Substance: literature review
SUBSTANCE
Metode
Sampel? Alat ukur?
Wawancara: berapa orang, protokol wawancara, hasil
wawancara, dst.
Kuesioner: definisi variabel, indikator perilaku, validitas,
reliabilitas, dst.
Teknik analisa? Bias?
CRAFTMANSHIP
Ikuti author guideline jurnal yang dituju
Jurnal Makara: HUBS-Asia hubsasia.ui.ac.id
Introduction Method
Results
Discussion
CRAFTMANSHIP
Introduction:
The introduction is CRITICAL It should be interesting
consist of:
1. Opening statements:
2. Review on previous studies 3. Research Question
4. Potential contributions 5. Study overview
Opening statements:
Phenomena: (1) data; (2) examples
A discussion about people and their behaviours, not
about psychologists and their research.
The occurrence of violence against women has
increased dramatically in the past 10 years (BPS, 2012)
Quotes
CRAFTMANSHIP
Convey complex thoughts and ideas as
simply
as you can.
One idea per sentence.
Each sentence has a Subject & Predicate One main idea per paragraph.
One paragraph consists of 4-7 sentences.
Concrete
examples
CRAFTMANSHIP
CONCISE
Focus on directly relevant materials.
We (Asian) have a tendency to digress, or discuss the context far too
long.
Differentiate thinking stage and writing stage.
Usually only the last 2-3 pages of student’s introduction section is
relevant.
Ask yourself:
Is this paragraph, sentence or word necessary?
Ask others:
CRAFTMANSHIP – penulisan
kebaruan
(1) Jelas, spesifik, dan langsung ke sasaran.
Topik penelitian ini penting diketahui karena ….
Artikel ini berkontribusi terhadap teori pendidikan
dengan menunjukkan bahwa …
Artikel ini akan menjembatani perdebatan yang ada
dengan cara ….
CRAFTMANSHIP – penulisan
kebaruan
(2) Kata-kata “Belum pernah dilakukan
sebelumnya” adalah kalimat yang tidak jelas, dan
belum tentu menunjukkan bahwa artikel tersebut
secara substantif menghadirkan pengetahuan
yang penting bagi masyarakat akademis.
(3): Topik penelitian yang penting untuk
diketahui dan, secara teoritis, belum diketahui
hanya dapat ditemukan melalui
kajian pustaka
yang berbobot
.
Menentukan outlet publikasi
43
Presentasi di Konferensi
Doctoral colloquium
Workshop on research methods, etc.
Proceeding
Jurnal nasional
Jurnal internasional : good, poor, predatory
Newspapers / books / social media
Type of International Journal
44
Predatory/Vanity
Poor Journal
Good Journal
Links
http://scholarlyoa.com/
Predatory Poor Good
Scope Too broad Specific Specific Name / Title The name does
not reflect its origin.
Has clear origin Has clear origin
Editorial board
& Reviewers No link to academic institution
Clear Link to academic institution
Clear Link to academic institution Academic
expertise of editorial board
No evident Clear
Acceptable H-index
Clear
Good H-index Trustworthy Review process No, or
extremely limited
Limited Thorough, double blind review
Indexed in Usually N/A Indexed in TR / Scopus
Indexed in TR / Scopus
Impact Factor Falsely claims to have IF (e.g., view factor)
The Impact Factor
The
impact factor
(IF) of an
academic journal
is a measure reflecting the
average number of
citations
to recent articles
published in the journal.
It is frequently used as a proxy for the relative
importance of a journal within its field, with journals with higher impact factors deemed to be more
important than those with lower ones.
The impact factor was devised by Eugene Garfield, the
founder of the Institute for Scientific Information.
Impact factors are calculated yearly for those journals
that are indexed in the Journal Citation Reports.
Contoh
the calculation is made every two years
Behavioral and Brain Sciences, IF: 21.952.
In 2010,
citation of articles published in 2009: 178;
citations of articles published in 2008: 283;
Total: 461
The number of articles published is 21 (2009 = 9; 2008=
12).
The impact factor is thus: 461 / 21 = 21.952.
Each article in BEHAV BRAIN SCI is thus (on the
average) 22 times cited in the past two years.
Differences between Rank
Thomson
-Reuters Google Scholar
Microsoft Academic Search
Behavioral and Brain
Sciences 1 >20 21
Annual review of Psychology 2 6 11
Psychological Bulletin 3 3 1
Trends in cognitive sciences 5 1 13
Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology 18 2 3
Menentukan Jurnal Target
49
Relevance
Quality of the journal
Review Process
Frequency of publication
Open access
ATTITUDES during the process of publication
HARGAI :
1. Rendah hati
2. Baca keputusan / input dengan hati-hati
3. Ingat bahwa input itulah yang menyebabkan kita maju.
4. Responi setiap input
PANTANG MUNDUR
1. Percaya diri
2. (hampir) semua artikel selalu harus memperbaik
tulisannya.
ATTITUDE - S O P - writing for int’l
journal
S
Set specific time to read & write
O
One step at a time
P
Persevere
Terimakasih
