DESIGNING A SET OF ENGLISH INSTRUCTIONAL LISTENING MATERIALS USING COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING FOR THE TENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMA BOPKRI 2 YOGYAKARTA
A THESIS
Presented as Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements to Obtain the Sarjana Pendidikan Degree
in English Language Education
By
Ezra Anggara Yuniarta Student Number: 051214032
ENGLISH LANGUAGE EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM DEPARTMENT OF LANGUAGE AND ARTS EDUCATION FACULTY OF TEACHERS TRAINING AND EDUCATION
Do not be with than transcends
e anxious ab nksgiving, pr s all unders
S
And fo
Ph bout anythin resent your standing, wi
I dedi
My almig
My b
Someone wh
or all of my f
iv hilippians 4 ng, but in ev requests to ill guard you
Jesus.
icate this th
ghty God Je
beloved big
hom I love w
friends who
4:6-7
verything, b o God. And t ur hearts an
hesis to:
sus Christ
Family
wholehearte
always sup
by prayer an the peace of nd your min
dly
pport me
vii
ABSTRACT
Yuniarta, Ezra Anggara. 2010. Designing a Set of English Instructional Listening Materials Using Communicative Language Teaching for the Tenth Grade Students of Sekolah Menengah Atas (SMA) BOPKRI 2 Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta: English Language Education Study Program, Sanata Dharma University.
Listening skill is a skill that needs to be developed in order to achieve good communication in real life. Listening skill could be developed by training it regularly and continuously in order to obtain a perfect communicative listening skill. Unfortunately, sometimes listening skill receives less attention from the English instructors than the other skills. One of the reasons is because of the limitation of the materials, especially audio materials. This case could be proven through the information which is gained by the writer from questionnaires and informal interview with the English teachers of SMA BOPKRI 2 Yogyakarta. Based on the consideration above, the writer is encouraged to design a set of English instructional listening materials using Communicative Language Teaching for the first semester of the tenth grade students of SMA BOPKRI 2 Yogyakarta and try to present the designed set of English instructional listening materials using Communicative Language Teaching for the first semester students of the first grade of SMA BOPKRI 2 Yogyakarta. There were two problems to be solved in this study. They are: 1) How is a set of English instructional listening materials using Communicative Langugae Teaching for the tenth grade students of SMA BOPKRI 2 Yogyakarta designed? 2) What does the designed set of English instructional listening materials using Communicative Language Teaching for the tenth grade students of SMA BOPKRI 2 Yogyakarta look like?
The writer adapted Kemp’s and Yalden’s instructional design models to answer the first question. There were six steps employed. They were: (1) Conducting Need Survey, (2) Stating the Competency Standard and Listing the Topics, (3) Stating Basic Competency, (4) Listing the Indicators, (5) Selecting Teaching and Learning Activities, (6) Conducting an Evaluation Survey and Revision.
The writer employed five steps of Research and Development method based on Borg and Gall. The steps were: (1) Research and Information Collecting, (2) Planning, (3) Developing Preliminary Form of Product, (4) Preliminary Field Testing, and (5) Main product Revision.
viii
consists of five sections, namely ‘Brainstorming’ as pre-listening, ‘Small Talk’, ‘Language Focus’ and ‘Listening for Meaning’ as the while-listening activities, and ’Speak Out’ as the post-listening activities.
ix
ABSTRAK
Yuniarta, Ezra Anggara. 2010. Designing a Set of English Instructional Listening Materials Using Communicative Language Teaching for the Tenth Grade Students of Sekolah Menengah Atas (SMA) BOPKRI 2 Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta: Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Universitas Sanata Dharma.
Kemampuan/Skill mendengarkan adalah kemampuan yang perlu dikembangkan dalam rangka untuk mencapai komunikasi yang baik dalam kehidupan nyata. Kemampuan mendengarkan dapat dikembangkan dengan pelatihan secara teratur dan berkesinambungan dalam rangka untuk mendapatkan Kemampuan mendengarkan komunikatif yang sempurna. Sayangnya, kadang-kadang Kemampuan mendengarkan mendapatkan perhatian yang kurang dari instruktur bahasa Inggris dibanding dengan kemampuan/skill lainnya. Salah satu alasannya adalah karena keterbatasan bahan, terutama bahan-bahan audio. Kasus ini bisa dibuktikan melalui informasi yang diperoleh oleh penulis dari kuesioner dan wawancara informal dengan guru bahasa Inggris dari SMA BOPKRI 2 Yogyakarta. Berdasarkan pertimbangan di atas, penulis terdorong untuk merancang serangkaian materi mendengarkan/listening pelajaran bahasa Inggris untuk siswa semester pertama kelas sepuluh SMA BOPKRI 2 Yogyakarta menggunakan Communicative Language Teaching dan mencoba untuk menyajikan bahan pengajaran mendengarkan untuk siswa semester pertama kelas sepuluh SMA BOPKRI 2 Yogyakarta menggunakan Communicative Language Teaching. Ada dua masalah yang harus diselesaikan dalam kajian ini. Masalah tersebut adalah: 1) Bagaimana seperangkat bahan-bahan pengajaran listening bahasa Inggris menggunakan Communicative Language Teaching untuk siswa kelas sepuluh SMA BOPKRI 2 Yogyakarta dirancang? 2) Seperti apakah seperangkat bahan-bahan pengajaran listening bahasa Inggris menggunakan Communicative Language Teaching untuk siswa kelas sepuluh SMA BOPKRI 2 Yogyakarta tersebut?
Penulis mengadaptasi model desain pembelajaran dari Kemp dan Yalden untuk menjawab pertanyaan yang pertama. Ada enam langkah yang digunakan. Langkah-langkah tersebut meliputi: (1) Melaksanakan Survei Kebutuhan, (2) Menentukan Kompetensi Standard dan Topik-Topik, (3) Menentukan Kompetensi Dasar, (4) Menentukan Indikator-Indikator, (5) Memilih Kegiatan Pembelajaran, (6) Melakukan Survei Evaluasi dan Revisi.
Penulis menggunakan lima langkah dari R & D. Langkah-langkah tersebut adalah: (1) Pengumpulan Informasi, (2) Perencanaan, (3) Pengembangan Bentuk Awal dari Produk, (4) Pengujian Awal Lapangan, dan (5) Perbaikan Produk Utama.
x
melakukan perbaikan berdasarkan pendapat dan saran, untuk menjawab pertanyaan kedua. Ada delapan unit dalam materi. Masing-masing unit terdiri dari 5 bagian, yaitu ‘Brainstorming’ sebagai kegiatan sebelum mendengarkan, ‘Small Talk’, ‘Language Focus’ and ‘Listening for Meaning’ sebagai kegiatan inti mendengarkan, dan ’Speak Out’ sebagai kegiatan setelah mendengarkan.
Diharapkan bahwa desain material ini dapat mendorong para peneliti lain untuk melakukan studi lebih lanjut dan selanjutnya dapat digunakan oleh guru-guru untuk meningkatkan penguasaan listening para siswa.
xi
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Firstly, I would like to give my best gratitude to my Almighty Lord Jesus Christ who had died to save my life. Without His love for me, I will not be able to finish this thesis and live in delight. I would like to thank my beloved sponsor Drs.Y. B. Gunawan, M.A. who always patiently guide me to finish my thesis. Even though sometimes I wanted to give up, he always encouraged me. My gratitude to all of the big family of Sanata Dharma University(C. Tutyandari, S.Pd., M.Pd., M. Frida Yulia S.Pd., M.Pd., Maria Martarina Pramudani, Chatarina Artilantari, Antonius Jody, S. Pd., F. Chosa Kastuhandani, S.Pd.) for supporting me to complete my thesis and for teaching me a lot of worthy things along my study.
I would like to give my gratitude to my beloved mother, my beloved father and my lovely sister “Priska Febrina Y.”, who always support and give me spirit to finish my study. I might give up without them. I give my gratitude to my girlfriend ‘Devita M.’ and her family (Mr. Ronny H., Mrs. N. Yulie H. and Desna R.),who always support me to finish my thesis soon.
xii
Thanks to Mawut Gang of PBI (Fidelis Windiawan, S.Pd., A. Wahyu W.P., S.Pd., Andres Jeffri, Y. Bondan, Fandi Herbayu and Agatha Pepy Y., S.Pd.) who always support and cheer my life with crazy and interesting things. I would like to give my gratitude for my beloved Rock The world Band (C. Panggih, Daniel A., Anto S., Romelo A. and Kunto A.) for always walk together to serve Jesus with our Rock Music. They are the best God’s musicians I never met before.
I would like to say thanks for all big family of Domby Kid’s hope in Code River, who have made me learn to love and care about children’s life. I have learnt a lot of things about poor children and how to treat them as our family. I would like to say thanks to the inhabitants of Grinjing 9C boardinghouse (Fajar A., A. Toro, Eka N., Wahyu N., Antok S., Findi A. and Agus E.) who always make the atmosphere become alive in our boardinghouse. Finally, I would like to thank all of my friends that I cannot mention one by one. Their friendship means a lot to me.
xiii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE PAGE……... i
APPROVAL PAGES... ii
DEDICATION PAGE ... iv
STATEMENT OF WORK’S ORIGINALITY ... v
ABSTRACT ... vii
ABSTRAK ... ix
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ... xi
TABLE OF CONTENTS ... xiii
LIST OF TABLES ... xvii
LIST OF FIGURES ... xviii
LIST OF APPENDICES ...xix
CHAPTER I : INTRODUCTION………..………1
A. Research Background ...1
B. Problem Formulation...4
C. Problem Limitation...4
D. Research Objectives...5
E. Research Benefits...5
F. Definition of Terms...6
CHAPTER II : REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE………...……….8
A. Theoretical Description ...8
xiv
a. Kemp’s model………...9
b. Yalden’s Model………...11
2. Teaching Listening……….13
a. The Nature of Teaching Listening………..14
b. Principles for Teaching Listening………...15
c. Types of Communicative Listening Activities………16
1) Pre-Listening Activities………...………16
2) While-Listening Activities………..……18
3) Post-Listening Activities………..…....…...20
3. Communicative Language Teaching………...23
a. The Nature of Communicative Language Teaching………...23
b. The Goal of Communicative Language Teaching………..24
c. Type of Activities in CLT………...25
4. Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP)………27
B. Theoretical Framework...28
CHAPTER III : METHODOLOGY A. Research Method………...33
B. Research Participants...35
C. Research Instruments...37
D. Data Gathering Techniques...38
E. Data Analysis Techniques... 39
xv
CHAPTER IV : RESEARCH FINDINGS AND DISCUSSIONS……….…...43
A. Elaboration of the Steps Conducted in Designing a Set of English Instructional Listening Materials... 43
1. Conducting Need Survey………... 43
2. Stating the Competence Standard and Listing the Topics... 55
3. Stating the Basic Competence... 56
4. Listing the Indicators... 58
5. Selecting teaching and learning activities...60
6. Evaluating the Designed Materials...63
B. The Result of the Evaluation Survey Administered to Evaluate the Designed Set of Materials...63
1. The Description of the Respondents………..………...63
2. Data Presentation in the Form of Descriptive Statistics………...64
3. Respondents' Comments on the Designed Set of English Listening Materials……….……….67
4. The Strengths of the Designed Set of English Listening Materials…………...68
5. The weaknesses of the Designed Set of English Listening Materials…………69
6. The Respondents' Suggestions on the Designed Set of Listening Materials………69
C. Discussion on the Designed Set of Materials Evaluation ...70
xvi
CHAPTER V : CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS………...………74
A. Conclusions...74
B. Suggestions ...75
REFERENCES ...77
xvii
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
Table 3.1: Points of Agreement………...….39
Table 3.2: The Descriptive Statistic of Respondents’ Opinions (Blank)……….39
Table 4.1: Summary of the Students’ Questionnaires Part 1……..………..…...…44
Table 4.2: Summary of the Students’ Questionnaire Part 2……….…47
Table 4.3: Summary of the Teachers' Questionnaires Part 1…….………..………..………..50
Table 4.4: Summary of the Teachers' Questionnaires Part 2…….………..51
Table 4.5: The Development of the topics and the themes in the Designed Set of English Instructional Listening Materials………...55
Table 4.6: The Basic Competence………57
Table 4.7: The Indicators……….………59
Table 4.8: The Description of the Respondents………..….64
Table 4.9: The Descriptive Statistics of Respondents' Opinions………..…...65
Table 4.10: The Topics……….……72
xviii
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Page
xix
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix Page
Appendix A : Letter of Permission ………...…….80
Appendix B : Students’ Questionnaire for Need Analysis ………...…….82
Appendix C : Teachers’ Questionnaire for Need Analysis ………....…...86
Appendix D : Materials Evaluation Questionnaire ……….………..….90
Appendix E : Syllabus ………..………....…….94
Appendix F : Lesson Plan ………..………...……111
1
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
In this chapter, the writer would like to present six major points, namely
research background, problem formulation, problem limitation, research
objectives, research benefits, and definition of terms. This introduction is intended
to build the main foundation for conducting the research.
A. Research Background
Nowadays, the development in the education field is advancing, especially
dealing with the materials used for the teaching learning activities in the
classroom. These days many second language teachers have changed their
paradigm in teaching. They develop the approach, methods and teaching strategies
that are used in the class. Many teachers have been very creative in preparing
materials. They creatively develop the materials so that the second language
students feel that learning is fun.
That fun learning can be implemented in various skills, especially listening
skill. However, until now there is still a paradigm in students’ mind that joining a
listening class is a boring activity. This can be affected by both the teachers’
method and the materials presented in the teaching learning activity. However,
listening is an important activity if someone wants to learn a second language. It
becomes the focus to be considered in the learning process, because it precedes
Listening is a receptive skill. The listener receives and understands the
input (information). Because listening is receptive, people can receive and
understand the input higher than when they produce in speaking or writing. It is
more complex than speaking or writing. When people listen, they combine the
information that they have already known with the new ideas to create meaning.
Those are the important reasons for the writer to focus on developing listening
materials for senior high school students.
There are so many methodologies and approaches that also become the
basis of the education field, especially in the teaching and learning activities. Each
of them has its own strengths and its own weaknesses to be implemented in the
classroom. Many researchers tell in their books about its implementation and
analyze them to obtain their advantages and disadvantages of the condition of the
students, teachers and the atmospheres in the classrooms. Teachers should be
aware of using the method or approach that is appropriate with the condition in
their teaching learning environment. There is no reference to say that this or that is
the best method or approach to be implemented in the classroom. Those depend
on the condition of the students and classroom including the facilities and the
existing media.
One approach that will be used in this study is Communicative Language
Teaching (CLT). The development of the teaching learning strategies nowadays is
directed with communicative instructions. Thus, this approach becomes a favorite
approach used by many educators in teaching their students in order to advance
set of principles about the goals of language teaching, how learners learn a
language, the kinds of classroom activities that best facilitate learning and the
roles of teachers and learners in the classroom” (Richards, 2005: 1). Moreover,
communicative teaching and learning are appropriate to be implemented in SMA
BOPKRI 2 Yogyakarta since the students need to have a good ability to
communicate communicatively in English when they are in university or in the
real working world.
Usually, CLT is often related to a speaking class. However, in this study
the writer wants to elaborate communicative strategy in the listening class.
Naturally students study language firstly from listening skill, then followed by
speaking skill, and then followed by reading and writing. Thus, learning listening
is the basis to learn other skills. When students listen to the listening materials,
they make a basic learning of a language and understand the speech pattern of the
native speaker, including the pronunciation, stress and intonation.
However, in BOPKRI 2 Senior High School Yogyakarta, the examination
for listening is done using audio recording device. Meanwhile, there are still not
enough listening materials that can be taught especially to the tenth grade
students. The students are taught listening using audio and video recording in the
language laboratory when they are in the eleventh and twelfth grade. Of course
this will increase students’ listening comprehension if the first grade students are
also taught listening using recorded audios that are spoken by the native speaker.
Moreover, they will be accustomed to native speaker’s accent and pronunciation.
listening materials using CLT for the tenth (first) grade students of SMA BOPKRI
2 Yogyakarta. The writer intends to help the English teachers of this school by
providing applicable listening materials. Moreover, the first grade students of this
school will study listening more effectively using Communicative Language
Approach designed in this study.
B. Problem Formulation
The problems in this study are stated as follows.
1. How is a set of English instructional listening materials using communicative
language teaching for tenth grade students of SMA BOPKRI 2 Yogyakarta
developed?
2. What does a set of English instructional listening materials using
Communicative Language Teaching for tenth grade students of SMA BOPKRI
2 Yogyakarta look like?
C. Problem Limitation
This study is limited to designing a set of English instructional listening
materials using communicative language teaching for the tenth grade students of
SMA BOPKRI 2 Yogyakarta. In addition, it is limited to only the first semester of
the tenth grade, in order to specify the research. The writer chooses the topic and
makes the set of instructional listening materials using materials which are
provided in some sources, like educational books and internet. The media used in
D. Research Objectives
This research is intended to answer the questions stated in the problem
formulation. The research objectives are to know how a set of instructional
listening materials for the tenth grade students of SMA BOPKRI 2 Yogyakarta
using Communicative Language Teaching is developed and to find out what does
it look like.
E. Research Benefits
The writer hopes that this study will give a lot of benefits for the English
teachers, tenth grade students of SMA BOPKRI 2 Yogyakarta, and for the future
researchers. First, the benefit for the English teacher is to provide them with a set
of listening materials using communicative approach so they can improve
themselves to encourage students’ listening ability related to the real
communication. This study will become a model for the teachers to produce
listening materials more, which are appropriate to the needs of the curriculum and
the students. Second, the benefit for the students is that it will be easier to improve
their listening skill using the appropriate materials provided. They will be richer,
especially in the listening comprehension and communication ability. Third, the
benefit for the future researches of English Education Study Program is that they
can do a research to analyze whether this instructional listening materials design
will be effective to be implemented in the English teaching and learning activities
F. Definition of Terms
Some specific terms will be used in this research. In order to avoid
misunderstanding and obtain the same idea during this research, the following
terms will represent some definitions of terms which are used in this research:
1. Instructional design
According to Kemp (1977:6), instructional design is the development of
an overall plan incorporating the interrelated parts in sequential pattern.
Moreover, Gagne and Briggs (1979:1-2) define instructional design as a
systematic framework of designing instruction which will activate and support
learning. In this study, instructional design is a systematic plan that will be used as
the steps in designing a set of instructional listening materials.
2. Communicative Language Teaching (CLT)
Communicative Language Teaching is an approach to the teaching of
second and foreign language that emphasizes interaction as both the means and
the goal of learning a language. According to Richards and Rodgers (2001: 159),
the communication approach in language teaching starts from a theory of
language as communication. The goal of language teaching is to develop what
Hymes (1979) as cited by Richards and Rodgers (2001: 159) referred to as
“communicative competence.” Therefore, in this study CLT is an approach that
will be the reference to construct the listening material design for the tenth grade
3. Listening
Listening is an activity where someone has to pay attention to
something or somebody. Goh (2002: 1) says that listening takes up as much as
50% of our everyday communication time. It is the main channel of classroom
instruction and the most used language skill at work and at home. In this study,
listening will become the English learning skill that will be studied to design an
instructional design for the tenth grade students of SMA BOPKRI 2 Yogyakarta.
4. SMA BOPKRI 2 Yogyakarta
SMA BOPKRI 2 Yogyakarta is one of private senior high schools in
Yogyakarta. It is located on Jenderal Sudirman street number 87, Yogyakarta. In
this study, this school becomes the subject where the research for designing the
listening materials be conducted.
5.Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP)
Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP) is an operational
curriculum that developed and implemented in each educational unit under the
coordination and supervision of educational department (Kunandar, 2007: 125). In
this study, KTSP becomes the guideline for the writer to design the listening
8 CHAPTER II
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
This chapter is intended to review some theories that can support this
research. The writer divides this chapter into two subheadings: theoretical
description and theoretical framework. In the theoretical description, the writer
discusses some related theories, while in the theoretical framework, the writer
summarizes and synthesizes them to help to solve the problems.
A. Theoretical Description
In the theoretical description, the writer reviews four main theories. They
are instructional design, teaching listening, Communicative Language Teaching
andKurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP).
1. Instructional Design
In this section, the writer discusses two instructional design models. They
are very important in this study, because the theories are used as the framework of
the study. According to Kemp (1977:6), instructional design involves the
development of an overall plan incorporating the interrelated parts of an
instructional process in a sequential pattern. Kemp (1977: 6) also says that it is
composed of many interrelated parts and functions that might operate in a
coherent manner in order to achieve success. From the explanation, instructional
design is a systematic plan in designing a set of lessons.
this study, the writer employes two instructional design models written by Kemp
and Yalden. Those instructional models are combined in order to design a set of
instructional materials.
a. Kemp’s Model
The first instructional design model is Kemp’s model. Kemp’s model is
derived from three essential elements. “They are the objectives (what must be
learnt), the activities and resources (what procedures and resources will work best
to reach the desired learning levels), and the evaluation (how we will know when
the required learning has taken place)” (Kemp, 1977:8).
Those three elements have been developed into eight important parts in
instructional design (Kemp, 1977: 8-9). They are as follows.
1. Consider goals, and then list topics, stating the general purposes for teaching
each topic.
2. Enumerate the important characteristics of the learners for whom the
instruction is to be designed.
3. Specify the learning objectives to be achieved in terms of measurable student
behavioral outcomes.
4. List the subjects content that supports each objectives
5. Develop pre-assessment to determine the student’s background and present
level of knowledge about the topic.
6. Select teaching/learning activities and instructional resources that will treat
7. Coordinate such support services as budget, personnel, facilities, equipment
and schedules to carry out the instructional plan.
8. Evaluate students’ learning in terms of their accomplishment of objectives,
with a view to revising and reevaluating any phases of the plan that need
improvement.
Figure 2.1 Kemp's Model (Kemp, 1977: 9)
From the perspective of teacher, the main strength of Kemp’s model is that
there is a concept that the process of designing and developing can be started from
any step. Another strength of it is that there is an emphasis on the materials,
objectives and application, and also the choosing of the learning resources.
Evaluation
Learner’s Characte-ristics
Learning Objective
s Support
Services
Pre-Assessment
Goals, Topics and
General Purposes
Teaching/ Learning Activities, Resource s
Subject Content
Descripti-on of Purpose
Production of a proto-syllabus b. Yalden's Model
The instructional design model proposed by Yalden, which is called
Language Program Developmet has step as the Figure 2.2 drawn below:
Figure 2.2 Yalden’s Language Program Development (Yalden, 1987: 88)
In the Yalden’s instructional design model, there are eight steps that must
be considered before a designer designs an instructional material of any subject.
The eight steps will be discussed one by one by the writer as follows.
1. Need Survey
A survey is conducted to know the learners’ needs and to analyze it, so
the instructional design will exactly fulfill the right needs of the learners. It
must include the identification of the communication requirements, personal
needs, motivations, relevant characteristics and resources of the learner.
2. Description of Purpose
In this stage the designer should clarify the purpose of the course based on the
information gathered during the first stage of program development. All the
information in the first stage is incorporated in this stage. In some cases, the
description of purpose is entirely dictated by the need assessment. Therefore,
in certain situation the syllabus designer might be constrained to add other
elements (such as study of the culture associated with the target language) Selection/
development of syllabus type Need
Survey
Producti-on of a pedagog-ical syllabus
Developm-ent and implementa-tion of classroom procedures
which might not come out of the needs survey quite directly (Yalden, 1987:
93).
3. Selection/Development of Syllabus Type
In this part, the language program designer will choose the most appropriate
syllabus for the instructional design. The choice of the syllabus type should
be based on the learners’ needs and characteristics, so it will work maximally
to support the teaching learning activities in the classroom.
4. Production of a Proto-Syllabus
The syllabus designer, at this stage, specifies the content derived from a
description of the purposes the learners have to acquire the target language.
This is a production of syllabus, which describe the language itself, and
language use to be covered in a certain program, which is developed.
5. Production of a Pedagogical Syllabus
Pedagogical syllabus represents a plan to implement the content of the
language teaching/learning at the classroom level. The language program
designer, in this step, should realize the syllabus in the form of
teaching-learning materials and testing approach.
6. Development and Implementation of classroom Procedures
In this step, the designer organizes the learning activities within the lesson
plan. Then, develop the teaching materials. Yalden (1987: 151) suggests that,
at this stage, the teacher should deal with the teaching techniques and realize
7. Evaluation
This step is intended to evaluate all components in the language program, i.e.
the students, the instructional program and the teaching.
8. Recycling stage
This step is intended to fit between goals set and the final performance of the
learners. The content is reassessed; the materials and the teaching approaches
are revised.
There are two strengths of Yalden’s model can be stated here. The first is
that Yalden’s model contains a needs analysis to know the needs of the students in
learning English. Based on the need analysis, the designer will establish the
foundation of the language program. Second, the evaluation contains recycling
stage in which the congruence or ‘fit’ between goals set and student performance
is determined, the content is reassessed, and the materials and the methodological
procedures are revised (Yalden, 1987: 96).
In this study, the writer combined the two design models stated by both
Kemp and Yalden. The two models support each other to construct a framework
of the instructional design. The writer took several steps in each models based on
the need of the study. Therefore, the weaknesses of one model are fixed by
another model.
2. Teaching Listening
The art of teaching listening is very important for teachers to learn and
Here, some important points in teaching listening will be discussed, which are the
nature of teaching listening, principles for teaching listening, type of listening
activities and characteristics of the listening process. The discussions are as
follows:
a. The Nature of Teaching Listening
Listening is a receptive skill. In this case, the listener receives and
understands the input (information). Because listening is receptive, we can receive
and understand the input higher than when we produce in speaking or writing. It is
more complex than speaking or writing. When people listen, they combine the
information that they have already known with the new ideas to create meaning.
Rost (1994: 141-142), as cited in Nunan (1999:200) says that listening in
the second language teaching and learning is important. It provides input for the
learner. If the learner does not understand the input in the right level, the learning
process will be blocked. He also gives other three important reasons of focusing
listening in the second language learning. They are as follows.
1) In spoken language, e.g. conversation, the learner can interact with others.
2) The learner is challenged to understand language as the native speakers are
when authentic spoken language is used.
3) Listening exercises help the teachers to draw learners’ attention to new forms
(vocabulary, grammar, new interaction, patterns) in the language.
Listening plays an important role in the learners’ development in learning
details and learn accuracy, since the learners are studying and understanding
grammar.
b. Principles for Teaching Listening
Morley (1971), as cited in Paulston and Bruder, (1976: 129-130) provides
a general set of principles for teaching listening comprehension. They are stated as
follows:
1) Listening comprehension lesson must have carefully stated goals that should
meet the overall curriculum, and both teacher and students should understand
what they are.
2) Listening comprehension tasks must be set with systematic planning which
goes from simple to complex in accordance with students’ language
proficiency.
3) Listening comprehension lesson should stimulate active obvious students’
participation. Written response to listening comprehension material is the
most overt type.
4) A communicative urgency for remembering should be viewed as the
important aspect in listening comprehension lesson because it develops
concentration. This is done by giving the students the writing assignment or
reading the vocabulary before they listen to the material.
5) Listening comprehension lesson should emphasize the present knowledge.
One of the purposes of listening is to strengthen the students’ immediate
receiving needs thinking and thinking needs memory.
c. Types of Communicative Listening Activities
There are three stages in listening activities for language learners:
pre-listening, while-pre-listening, and post-pre-listening, which will be discussed in detail in
this section.
1) Pre-Listening Activities
According to Goh (2002: 28), pre-listening activities can be differentiated
into two main categories, which are language-oriented and knowledge-oriented.
Language-oriented of pre-listening aims to introduce the students about the type
of language including the specific words and pronunciation that are used in the
while-listening activities later. This is to facilitate the perception and parsing
phases of comprehension (Goh, 2002: 28). Knowledge-oriented, on the other
hand, prepares the students by encouraging them to activate or acquire relevant
types of their general knowledge. This will facilitate top-down processing (Goh,
2002: 28). According to Goh (2002: 28), there are several examples of types of
activities in pre-listening section that will be discussed by the writer as follows.
The first example of activities in pre-listening is called brainstorming. In
this method, the students are asked by the teacher to call out words or phrases that
are related to the topic to be put on the board or OHP. It is conducted to all of
students in that class. Brainstorming is very important to either activate students’
general knowledge related to the topic or prepare the students about the language
The second is called Mind-mapping. To recall the students’ world
knowledge about related topic and to recognize the language use in the listening,
mind mapping is doing well. It can cover the both categories language-oriented
and knowledge oriented of pre-listening activities. In this method, the teacher asks
the students to write down words or draw simple pictures in a web individually.
Discussion is going to be the third types of pre-listening activities. It’s
usually conducted by students in a group or in pairs. The students are asked to
discuss similar or related issues based on prompt questions or pictures. This
method contains both aspects of language-oriented and knowledge-oriented that
will be beneficial for the students’ comprehension to the listening passages.
The fourth type of activities in the pre-listening section is games. Both
language-oriented and knowledge oriented exist in this method. There are a lot of
games to be conducted for the students, and they depend on the creativity of the
teacher to fit with the topic. It is usually simple word or information-gap games.
The game can be conducted in pairs, in group or whole class.
Pictures/diagrams also can be used as the media of pre-listening activities.
The students are asked to complete illustrations with simple drawing or words, for
example. This method can be implemented in pairs or individually in listening
class. It is important to activate students’ general knowledge related to the topic or
prepare the students about the language that will be used in the listening passage
later.
The sixth type is prediction. The students can be asked to predict the
while-listening activities later. It can be conducted in pairs or individually by the
students. Language-oriented and knowledge oriented aspect are included in this
prediction method.
The last type is skimming. In this method, the students individually read a
related short text for gist that has been prepared by the teacher. This will help the
students to understand more about the listening passage that will be played in the
while-listening activities. Recognizing the language, specific words and
pronunciation will be the aim in this activity. Moreover, the students will activate
their world knowledge related to the topic.
2) While-Listening Activities
There are many different kinds of tasks for students to do while they are
listening to a passage. The while-listening stage is the most difficult for the
teacher to control, because this is where the student needs to pay attention and
process the information actively. However, if the teacher provides a reason, goal,
or task for the learner, this can encourage and help the listener to focus. Below are
just a few examples of type of activities cited from swust.net.cn (2009).
The first is called No specific responses. Many researchers in the
education field recently research about listening activities in the classroom. It has
shown that by not giving students any task the first time they listen to a passage, it
can take the anxiety out of listening. The teacher can make encouraging activities
for the students, such as with stories or with any kind of material that is
interesting, humorous, or dramatic, because learners are likely to pay attention and
The second is listen and sequence. In this type, the students are asked by
the teacher to find out the order of things based on what they hear in the listening
passage. Through this activity, the students will learn to complete a task even
when they do not understand every word they hear. This will builds up their
ability to comprehend something by understand, not by memorize it. It will also
help them to prepare for the real world where they certainly will not be able to
memorize everything they hear, but understand it.
The third is listen and act. It is just like total physical response, which
concentrates on learning language by listening and responding physically to
commands or directions. There are many variations of how this can be carried out
in a classroom, depends on the teacher’s creativity to manage the class.
The fourth is listen and draw. In this type of activities, the students are
asked to draw pictures, diagrams, etc. on paper based on what they have listened
in the recording. It works very well as an information gap activity between pairs
of students.
The fifth is listen and fill. This is a kind of activity that teachers are
probably very familiar with. The students read along while they listen to
something and fill in the blanks with the words that they hear. It is easy to design
this type of tasks. All teacher needs to do is to decide which words to take out and
replace with blanks. Note that it is important not to overdo this type of tasks, since
it gives students the impression that they need to understand every word and it
will bore them.
provide real descriptions of a person, place, thing, action, etc. Learners write
down what they think it is. Games can be implemented in this type of activity,
such as the students listen to the descriptions of something, and then they guess it
and write down what they think is being described.
The advantage of doing these types of listening activities in the
while-listening section is that it personalizes the lesson so the students are more
interested in listening, especially if a game element is involved where the class
can be divided into teams. Competition in the class activity increases the students’
motivation. This type of activity also integrates listening skill with the other skills,
especially speaking. Therefore, it helps prepare students for listening situations in
real life where often several skills need to be used simultaneously.
3) Post-Listening Activities
In the post-listening stage the teacher can determine how well the students
have understood what they listen. “Post-listening activities should be an extension
of communicative outcomes and listening materials” (Goh, 2002: 29). However, it
is important to design the tasks well.
One important point to keep in mind is whether the teachers are testing the
students’ listening comprehension or their memory as mentioned in the
“Principles for teaching listening” section. If the listening text is too long or
complicated, students can forget what they have heard even in their native
language. It is also possible for the students to remember and repeat things they
heard, even if they did not understand them. But, it is more common for people to
In her book, Goh (2002: 29) writes about the aims that can be achieved in
the post-listening activities. These aims include helping the students to practice
other language skills (Speaking, reading and writing) using the same theme/topic.
Post-listening activities also can help the students to examine and reinforce
language points (e.g. grammar, vocabulary, useful expression). Moreover, it can
help the students to personalize the contents of the listening material (e.g. literary
texts). The last aim is to help the students in acquiring further content knowledge
related to the theme/topic of the listening material.
There are several types of activities in this post-listening activity, as
mentioned in the Goh’s book (2002: 30):
1. Short written texts (individual)
-Write letters, postcards, messages, diaries, dialogues, poems based on the
listening text or to extend it.
2. Summaries (individual/pair)
-Summarizes the whole text or a pre-selected part orally or in writing.
3. Oral presentation (Individual/pair/whole class)
-Short informal presentations or listening outcomes.
4. Dramatization (pair/group)
-Dramatize the whole texts or a portion of it.
5. Role play (group/pair)
-Continue the story or situation by assuming the roles of people in the text.
6. Language analysis (pair/whole class)
selected phonological modifications in the listening materials.
7. Language work (Individual)
-Modify the listening text by transforming tenses of verbs, changing nouns and
pronouns from singular to plural forms, or male to female, or vice versa.
8. Vocabulary work (individual/pair)
-use selected vocabulary items in further writing or speaking tasks.
9. Recording (pair/group)
-Make an audio or video recording based on listening outcomes or as an
extension of the listening text.
10. Group sharing (group/pair)
-One member of each group circulates among other groups to share listening
outcomes.
11. Publication (group)
-The findings from simulation and discussion tasks on contemporary issues are
published in print or on-line.
12. Reading (individual/pair)
-Read related texts for comprehension and further information.
13. Oral practice (individual/pair)
-Use the listening text (e.g. poem, transcripts of dialogues) to practice
pronunciation/ reading aloud.
The writer combined all the explanations about the nature of teaching
activities to support the making of listening instructional design later. Those
theories above are used by the writer in order to achieve the most effective
teaching and learning activities when it is applied in the classroom. Moreover, by
following the theories, the writer wishes to complete the objectives of the lesson
and also can encourage the students’ motivation through attractive communicative
listening activities.
3. Communicative Language Teaching
In this sub topic the writer would like to elaborate some theories dealing
with communicative language teaching and its implementation in the classroom.
This would cover some discussion about the nature of communicative language
teaching, goal of communicative language teaching and type of activities in CLT.
a. The Nature of Communicative Language Teaching
Basically there are a lot of definitions of CLT proposed by scientists in
this last decade. Therefore the writer would like to take some definitions that are
suitable and clear enough to be understood both by the writer and the readers.
According to Richards (2005: 2), CLT can be understood as a set of principles
about the goals of language teaching, how learners learn a language, the kinds of
activities that best facilitate learning, and the roles of teachers and learners in the
classroom that all of them set the goals to the communicative competence.
Meanwhile, Martalinova (2006: 37) defines CLT as an approach to the second and
pattern and rules. It gives the students chances to improve their ability to
communicate in the target language.
The role of the instructor in CLT is quite different from traditional
teaching methods. In the traditional classroom, the teacher is in charge and
"controls" the learning. In CLT the teacher serves as more of a facilitator,
allowing students to be in charge of their own learning. The teacher still sets up
exercises and gives direction to the class, but the students do much more
communication than in a traditional classroom. These types of model can often
lead the students to an increased sense of confidence in using the language.
Richards and Rodgers (1986: 66) defines that CLT has two aims. They are:
1) to make communicative competence the goal of the language teaching, and 2)
to develop procedure for the teaching of four language skills that acknowledge the
interdependence of language and communication.
b. The Goal of Communicative Language Teaching
Communicative language teaching has its goals of communicative
competence. Therefore, all of the activities in the classroom conducted by the
teacher should be aimed to achieve the communicative competence that can be
applied by the students in the real communication. Richards (2005: 2) also write
the aspects of language knowledge included in the communicative competence.
Those aspects were elaborated as follows.
1. Knowing how to use language for a range of different purposes and functions.
participants (e.g. knowing when to use formal and informal speech or when to
use language appropriately for written as opposed to spoken communication).
3. Knowing to produce and understand different types of texts (e.g. narratives,
reports, interviews and conversations).
4. Knowing how to maintain communication despite having limitations in one's
language knowledge (e.g. through using different kinds of communication
strategies).
c. Type of Activities in CLT
There are a lot of types of activities in CLT. Richards (2005: 21) in his book
mentions some kind of activities in the CLT, which are as follows.
1. Task-completion activities: puzzle, games, map-reading and other kinds of
classroom task in which the focus was on using one's language resources to
complete a task.
2. Information gathering activities: students conducted surveys, interviews and
searches in which students were required to use their linguistic recourses to
collect information.
3. Opinion-sharing activities: activities where students compare values,
opinions, beliefs, such as a ranking task in which students list six qualities in
order of importance which they might consider in choosing a date or spouse.
4. Information-transfer activities: these require learners to take information that
is presented in one form, and represent it in different form. For example, they
showing the sequence, or they may read information about a subject and then
represent it as a graph.
5. Reasoning-gap activities: these involve deriving some new information from
given information through the process of inference, practical reasoning, etc.
for example, working out a teacher's timetable on the basis of given class
timetables.
6. Role-plays: activities in which students are assigned roles and improvise a
scene or exchange based on given information or clues.
A lot of important aspects of CLT are reflected from the example of
activities discussed above. We can see from the examples above that usually the
activities in CLT conducted in pairs or a small group. Therefore there are a lot of
benefits will be obtained by the students in these kinds of class model. The
students can learn from listening the language used by other members of the
group. The students can also produce a greater amount of language then they
would use in the teacher-fronted activities. Their motivational level is likely
increase because the activities can encourage the student not to be bored. The last
benefit is the students will have the chance to develop their fluency.
The writer combined all the explanations about the nature of
communicative language teaching, the goal of communicative language teaching
and type of activities in CLT to support the making of instructional listening
materials design later on. Those theories above were used in order to achieve the
4. Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP)
Every country needs curriculum in its educational field in order to achieve
the goal of the teaching and learning activities. Based on oxford advanced
learners’ dictionary (1995: 287), curriculum is defined as the subjects included in
a course of study or taught at a particular school, college, etc. Moreover, Lewis
and Miel as cited by Sailor, Alexander and Lewis (1981: 3) in their book, defines
curriculum as a set of intentions about opportunities for engagement of
persons-to-be-educated with other persons and with things in certain arrangements of time
and space.
Recently, the curriculum that is implemented in Indonesia is Educational
Unit Level Curriculum (KTSP). KTSP is an operational curriculum that is
developed and implemented in each educational unit under the coordination and
supervision of educational department (Kunandar, 2008: 125). Kunandar also
states that it emphasizes on the development of ability to do the tasks with certain
performance standard, in which the result can be felt by the students, in the form
of mastery toward the certain sets of competency. Every educational unit (school)
is given chance to develop its own curriculum for the learning process, while the
central government (Depdiknas) only gives the assistance that will be considered
in the development of the curriculum. Muhaimin, sutiah and sugeng (2008: 2) in
their book states that the autonomy given to school is referred to the development
of the curriculum, known as KTSP, which is operational curriculum constructed
and implemented by each educational unit/school.
The writer adopted the syllabus from SMA BOPKRI 2 Yogyakarta which is
basically taken from the syllabus of Depdiknas to analyze the competence
standard and the basic competence that later become the guideline to make the
indicators and materials.
B. Theoretical Framework
To answer the questions in the problem formulation, the writer will
combine and synchronize the combination of Kemp’s (1977: 9) and Yalden’s
(1987: 88) instructional design models, since they can support and complete each
other. Kemp’s instructional design model was adapted in this study because it is
flexible. The writer can start from any step in the instructional design model.
Meanwhile, Yalden’s instructional design model strengthens and supports the
important steps existing in Kemps’s model. Yalden’s model contains a needs
analysis to know the needs of the students in learning English. Based on the need
analysis, the designer will establish the foundation of the language program.
Moreover, the evaluation in Yalden’s model contains a recycling stage in which
the fit between goals set and student performance is determined, the content is
reevaluated, and the materials and the methodological procedures are revised.
Moreover, the writer also synthesized the instructional design models with the
theory of listening, theory of Communicative Language Teaching and the
Syllabus of KTSP to construct a proper set of English instructional listening
materials.
Language Teaching approach for the tenth grade students of SMA BOPKRI 2
Yogyakarta are conducting need survey, stating the competence standard and
listing the topics, stating basic competence, listing the indicators, selecting
teaching and learning activities, and conducting an evaluation survey and revision.
The steps will be discussed further as follows.
1. Conducting Need Survey (adapted from Yalden’s model)
This step is adapted from Yalden’s model. One of the important things in
designing instructional material is knowing the learners’ condition and the
learners’ needs specifically. This will influence a lot the content of the language
teaching. By conducting a needs survey, it can also determine the goal of the
course that wants to be achieved. It will be conducted by the writer through
questionnaires and interviews.
2. Stating the Competence Standard and Listing the Topics (adapted from Kemp's
model)
The starting point of the instructional design is stating the competency
standard and the topics that are taken from KTSP syllabus. The purpose of stating
the competency standard is to determine the goals of what the students will be
able to perform at the end of the whole instruction. “All educational programs are
based on broadly stated goals” (Kemps, 1977: 14). After stating the competency
standard, listing the topics will be the next step. “Those topics, or unit headings,
would become the scope of the course or program, the basis for the instruction”
(Kemp, 1977: 14). Moreover, Kemp also states that topics are usually sequenced
level.
3. Stating Basic Competence (adapted from Kemp's model)
Kemp (1977: 16) explains that identifying the goals of each topic should
be done after listing the topics. It is used for guiding the teacher and the students
to achieve the goal of each topic.
Nevertheless, this study intends to formulate the goal of each topic called
`basic competency'. This basic competency helps the teachers conduct teaching
learning process and the students are able to follow the lessons because the
competencies to be learned are well organized.
4. Listing the Indicators (adapted from Kemp's model)
Kemp (1977: 23) uses words learning objectives instead of indicators.
Kemp also suggests this step as determining the learning objectives in order to
achieve certain students' measurable performances. “Learning requires active
effort by the learner. Thus, all objectives must be stated in terms of activities that
will best promote learning” (Kemp, 1977: 23).
5. Selecting Teaching and Learning Activities (adapted from Kemp’s model)
Producing a set English listening materials design for first grade students
of BOPKRI 2 Yogyakarta Senior High School become the focus in this study. The
materials are designed based on the principles in the communicative language
teaching (CLT) and the theory and principles in teaching listening.
Basically, the writer intends to design a set of listening instructional
materials, which enable students not only merely listen, but also give them
methods and techniques existing in Communicative Language Teaching, which
promote communicative classroom activities. Role-play and group discussion will
be some examples of the activities during the listening class. Any other kinds of
interesting activities will be applied in the material, so the student will be
motivated and encouraged to follow the lesson.
6. Conducting an Evaluation Survey and Revision (adapted from Kemp’s and
Yalden’s model)
After designing the materials, the writer conducts an evaluation survey.
The main purpose of the survey is to acquire some feedback and comments from
the teachers and the lecturers related to the materials design. Thus, the writer
acknowledged the weaknesses and the strengths of the materials design that are
presented. After knowing the weaknesses of the materials design, the writer
conducted revisions, so the materials design will become more appropriate and
suitable to be implemented for the first grade students of BOPKRI 2 Yogyakarta
Senior High School. Since the materials are not implemented, the evaluation will
be gained by distributing questionnaires to the English teachers of BOPKRI 2
Yogyakarta Senior High School and some lectures of Sanata dharma who are in
charge in examining the materials design. The result of the questionnaire is used
to improve the materials design. The revising and improving the materials design
will be conducted after the writer got the revision and suggestions from the
teachers and the lectures through the questionnaires. This step is taken in order to
make the instructional design becomes perfect to be implemented by the teacher
The following figure shows the writer’s instructional model to design the
set of English instructional listening materials for the tenth grade students of SMA
BOPKRI 2 Yogyakarta.
Figure 2.3: The Writer’s Model Conducting Need Survey
Stating the Competency Standard and Listing the
Topics
Conducting an evaluation survey and revision Selecting teaching and
learning activities Listing the Indicators Stating Basic Competency
R
evi
33
CHAPTER III
METHODOLOGY
In this chapter, the writer discussed the methodology used for obtaining
the data needed. It would be used to answer the research problems; first, how a
set of listening instructional materials using Communicative Language Teaching
for tenth grade students of SMA BOPKRI 2 Yogyakarta is developed, and second,
what a set of listening instructional materials using Communicative Language
Teaching for tenth grade students of SMA BOPKRI 2 Yogyakarta look like.
This chapter was divided into six sections. They were research method,
research participants, research instruments, data gathering techniques, data
analysis techniques, and research procedure in implementing the methodology.
A. Research Method
The steps in the writer’s model are based on educational Research and
Development (R&D). It is used to answer the questions in the problem
formulation. Moreover, it is the most appropriate research method, because it
develops and validates educational products. Educational research and
development is different from basic research, which aims to discover new
knowledge, and applied research, which aims to answer some specific questions
about practical problems. “Research and development can translate the basic and
applied research findings into usable educational products” (Borg, 1963:772).
meet its objective and also can be applied in the real classroom.
The writer, in this section, compared his model with the ten steps of R &
D in order to make the design become valid and be able to be implemented in the
classroom activities. The first step in R & D is research and information
collecting, which includes the literature review, classroom observation, and
preparation of report of state of the art. This step fits with the writer’s model,
which is conducting need survey. The second step in R & D is the planning,
where it is similar to the steps adapted from the writers’ model, which are stating
the competency standard and listing the topics, stating the basic competency, and
listing the indicators. The third step of R & D is develop preliminary form of
product, where the designer builds the product so it will gain feedback from the
test. This step is similar to writer’s model, which is selecting teaching and
learning activities. The next steps are preliminary field testing, main product
revision, main field testing, operational product revision, operational field testing,
final product revision, and the last is dissemination and implementation.
Moreover, the preliminary field testing step and main product revision in R & D
have similar form to the last step in the writer’s model, which is conducting an
evaluation survey.
From the explanation above, it is clear that the writer’s model and R & D
share the same features. Therefore, it can be said that the writer’s model adapted
from Kemp’s model and Yalden’s model can be considered as valid, because it
matches the R & D. In this study, the writer used the conducting need survey,
listing the indicators, selecting teaching and learning activities, conducting an
evaluation survey and revision for the materials design from the writer’s model.
Those six steps will be the basis to design the materials, while R & D will supply
the procedure to test and revise the design. In other words, R & D is the
“umbrella” for the seven steps in the writer’s model. Further explanation of
comparison between both procedures, is shown in Figure 3.1 on page 36.
B. Research Participants
In this study, the research participants were divided into two groups. The
first group was chosen to contribute the data for needs analysis. They were the
tenth grade students and two English teachers of SMA BOPKRI 2 Yogyakarta.
The writer chose the students randomly from the tenth grade and chose the
teachers who had been teaching in the first grade for minimum 5 years.
The second group was chosen for the post-design research. The writer
distributed the instructional materials and the questionnaires to three teachers of
SMA BOPKRI 2 Yogyakarta who had been teaching for minimum 5 years and
two lecturers of Sanata Dharma University who were expert in teaching listening.
The writer expected that the respondents could evaluate the instructional materials
and gave comments and suggestions on the instructional material. By gaining
comments, the writer could make necessary changes in the instructional material.
After knowing the research participants, in the next section the writer discussed
the instruments applied in this research. The instruments themselves were used to
Figure 3.1 Comparison between R & D and The six steps of the Writer’s Model
Planning
Stating Basic Competency
Main field testing
Selecting teaching and learning activities
collecting
Main product revision
Listing the Indicators
Preliminary field testing Develop preliminary form of
product
Stating the Competency Standard and Listing the
Topics
Operational product revision
Dissemination and implementation Final product revision Operational field testing
C. Research Instruments
In order to gain the data in Research and Development, the writer used
questionnaire as the instrument. There are two forms of questionnaires. The first
one is the open form (Best, 1970:163). The open form gives the respondents the
opportunity to answer in their own words, since the questions are open-ended. The
open form gives the freedom in giving a response. In this case, the respondents
may reveal the information or feeling that will not appear in the close form
(Wiersma, 1995:181). The second one is the closed form (Best, 1970:162). It has
selected response or forced-choice items for which the respondents select from
two or more options (Wiersma, 1995:181). The closed form was used in this
research, because of its advantages. The closed form questionnaire enhances
consistency of response across the respondents.
In this research, the writer conducted the research twice. The first research
or pre-design research was used to gain the information from the respondents. In
the pre-design research, the writer combined two kinds of questions in one
questionnaire. The first nine questions were close-ended. The participants simply
checked the answer. The last four questions were open-ended. The writer provided
many alternatives and a blank if the answer was not available. The participants
could answer more than one based on their opinion. The participants of pre-design
research were first grade students and two teachers of SMA BOPKRI 2
Yogyakarta.
The second research was conducted to gain the information on material
changes in the instructional material. The post-design research was conducted to
evaluate the product. The questionnaire was attached to the product. In the first
part, there were eight close-ended questions. In the next part, there were four open
ended questions.
Therefore, after the discussing the instrument of the research, the
discussion moves on to how the writer gathered the data from the participants.
D. Data Gathering Techniques
The data gathering technique that was used to collect the data was
distributing the questionnaire sheets to the participants. It was conducted twice. In
the pre-design survey, the questionnaire was distributed to know the response of
the students toward listening class, their difficulties and favorite activities. To
conduct this research, the writer joined the class and observed the class. The
writer distributed the questionnaire at the end of the class. The students had to
answer the questions in the questionnaire, and at that time, they submitted the
questionnaires.
The second one was in the post-design survey. It was distributed to three
English teachers of SMA BOPKRI 2 Yogyakarta and two lecturers of Sanata
Dharma University. This questionnaire aimed to evaluate the instructional
material that had been developed by the writer. The feedback was gained to revise
E. Data Analysis Techniques
The data were analyzed in order to find out the central tendency of the
respondents’ opinions about needs analysis and the designed materials. At the
end, the writer made some revisions on the designed materials based on the
questionnaires.
The judgment of the participants’ statements on the questionnaires used
five points of agreement. They are presented as follows.
Table 3.1 Points of Agreement
Points of agreement Meaning
1 If the respondents strongly disagree with the statements. 2 If the respondents disagree with the statements.
3 If the respondents feel uncertain about the stateme