• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

D IPA 0706850 Bibliography

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "D IPA 0706850 Bibliography"

Copied!
12
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Abern. A. J. & Rindell. 1999. Applying inquiry-based and cooperative group learning: Higher Education Development Center University of otago, Dunedin, New Zeeland.

Ajeyalemi. (1993). Teaching Science By Inquiry In The Secondary School. Second edition, Columbus: Charles E.Merill Publishing Company.

Amin, M. (20024). Mengajarkan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (SAINS) Dengan Menggunakan Metode “Discovery” dan “Inquiry”, Jakarta: Proyek

Pengembangan Lembaga Pendidikan Tenaga Kependidikan, Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi, Depdikbud.

Anderson, at, al. (2001). A Taxonomy For Learning, Teaching And Assessing: A Revision Of Bloom’s Taxonomy. New York. Longman Publishing.

Andreas, W., Stefan, A., Bodo, E., and Hans, J. (2006). Multimedia In Physics Education. Department of Physics Technical :University of

Kaiserslautern, Germany.

Anggraeni, S. (2006). Pengembangan Program Perkuliahan Biologi Umum Berbasis Inkuiri bagi Calon Guru Biologi. Disertasi Program Studi Pendidikan IPA. Bandung: SPs. UPI

Arends, R. I. (1998). Learning To Teach. Singapore: McGraw-Hill book Company.

Arikunto, suharsimi. (2008). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Tarsito Bandung.

Aswin. C, S., Rama. C and Qinfen. Z. (2002). Tracking Objects In Video Using Motion And Appearance Models. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Maryland: College Park.

Beichner, R. J. (1994). Test of Understanding of Graph-Kinematics. Physics Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina . tersedia dalam: http://www.ncsu.edu/per/

.. (1994). Force And Motion Conceptual Evaluation. Physics Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina . tersedia dalam: http://www.ncsu.edu/per/.

(2)

Bloom. (1979). A Coginitive Model of learning. Tersedia dalam:

Http://www.longleaf.net/ggrow/StrategicReader/StratRead.html.

Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1993). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Brotosiswoyo, B.S. (2000). Hakekat pembelajaran MIPA di perguruan tinggi. Jakarta: Proyek Pengembangan Universitas Terbuka Direktorat Jenderal Penddikan Tinggi, Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Brown, D. (2008). Video Modeling:Combining Dynamic Model Simulations With Traditional Video Analysis. Physics Department, Cabrillo College, Aptos. Tersedia dalam: http:// www.cabrillo.edu/~dbrown/tracker.

Bryan, J. (2005). Physics activities for family math and science nights. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online. 3(2). 19-21. Available at:

http://www.phy.ilstu. edu/ jpteo.

BSNP. (2006). Panduan Penyusunan Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. BNSP.Jakarta.

Chandra. E, dkk (2012) Penerapan program pelatihan kemampuan inkuiri dan mengajar sains secara inkuiri untuk meningkatkan persiapan dan mengajar sains secara inkuiri. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 13(1) Jurusan Pendidikan MIPA FKIP Universitas Lampung). Tidak diterbitkan

Candy, Philip C. (2000). Reaffirming a proud tradition: Universities and lifelong learning. Active Learning in Higher Education 1; 101. Tersedia: http://www.sagepub.com.

Carin, Arthur And Sund, R.B. (1997). Teaching Science Through Discovery (6 edition). Ohio : Meril Publishing Company.

.(1977) Teaching Modern Science, Sevent edition, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.

Costa, A. L.(1999). Teaching for intelligence. Arlington Heights, Illinois: Skylight Training and Publishing, Inc.

(3)

David, R. S.(2007). RealTime Physics: active learning labs transforming the introductory introductory Laboratory. IOP Publishing European Journal Of Physics.

Discovery Education.(2006).Scientific Method. Tersedia dalam

http://school.discovery.com/sciencefaircentral/scifairstudio/handbook/

Dole, J. A. & Sinatra, G. M. (1998). Reconceptualizing change in the cognitive construction of knowledge. Educational Psichologist,33(2/3), 109-128.

Erlendsson,J.(2001).Learning Motivation. Educational Productivity, http://www.hi.is/~joner/eaps/wh.sdlmo.htm

Etkina, E. (2005). Physics teacher preparation: dreams and reality. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online. 3(2). 3-9.

Fatkhulloh. (2012) Penentuan koefisien restituti menggunakan video based laboratory dan logger 3.84. Proseding seminar nasional “penelitian,

pendidikan dan penerapan MIPA” 02 Juni 2012 FMIPA UNY. ISBN: 978 -979-99314-6-7.). tidak diterbitkan

Gallagher, J.J. (2006). Teaching Science for Understanding. New York: Prenti Hall.

Gardner, H. (1999 a). The dicipline mind: What all students should understand. New York: Simon & Schuster Inc.

Gardner, H. (1999 b). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21th century. New York: Basic Books.

Garton, Janetta., (2005). Inquiry-Based Learning. Willard R-II School District, Technology Integration Academy.

Gipps. (1994). Learning Cooperative Learning via Cooperative Learning: A Source book of Lesson Plans for Teacher Education on Cooperative Learning. Singapore: Regional Language Center

Griffith,T.W.(2007). The Physics of Everyday Phenomana: Journal The Physics Teacher, 30, 546 – 552.

(4)

Hardono Hadi, P. (2001). Epistemologi: Filsafat Pengetahuan.Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Harris, K.L., at.al. (2007). Enhancing Assessment in the Biological Sciences: Ideas and Resources for University Educators (Assessing Generic Skills). Tersedia dalam www.bioassess.edu.au./bioassess/go/home/pid.

Hassard, J. & Dias, M. (2005). The Art of Teaching Science: Inquiry and Innovation in Middle School and High School. New York: Routledge. Introduction to Physics.McGraw Hill : New York.

Haury, L. David. (1993). Teaching Science Through Inquiry. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environment Education

Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J. D., & Smaldino, S. E. (2002). Instructional media and technology for learning, 7th edition.New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.

Hestenes, D. and Wells, M. (1992). A Mechanics Baseline Test. Published in: The Physics Teacher 30 (3), 159-166.

Heuvelen, A., V. (2000).The Workplace, Student Minds, and Physics Learning Systems. Journal American of Physics, Vol. 69 (11). Nov

2000.Tersedia dalam: http://www.colorado.edu.

Ihalouw, J. J. O. I. (2000). Bangunan teori. Salatiga: Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana.

Jie Shao, S.and Rama, (2004). Simultaneous background and foreground

modeling for tracking in surveillance video. Research and Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Maryland: College Park.

Johnson, E.B. (2002). Contextual teaching and learning. California: Corwin Press Inc

Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. Journal College Teaching, 44, 43-47.

Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research, Theoretical & methodological. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

(5)

Joyce, et al (2000). Models of Teaching. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Kamsah, M.Z., (2004). Developing generic skills in classroom environment:

Engineering Student’s Perspective

Koschan, S.K., Kang, J.K., Paik, B and Abidi, M. (2002) Video Object Tracking Based On Extended Active Shape Models With Color Information. University of Tennessee Knoxville:Tennessee

Kaniawati, I.(2005). Peningkatan kemampuan bahasa simbolik dan kemampuan pemodelan matematika mahasiswa calon guru fisika Melalui

pembelajaran berbasis inquiry. FPMIPA UPI. tidak diterbitkan.

Kuhn, T. S. (2002). The structure of scientific revolution. Alih bahasa: Tjun Surjaman. Bandung: P. T. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Lawrence T. Escalada, Dean A. Zollman. (1997). An Investigation on the Effects of Using Interactive Digital Video in a Physics.Journal Of Research In Science Teaching Vol. 34, NO. 5, PP. 467–489.

Lawson,A.E.(1995). Science teaching and the development of thinking. Wadsworth : California

Lazarowitz, R. & P. Tamir. (1994). “Research on Using Laboratory Instruction in

Science.” Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning. Edited by: D. L. Gabel. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company. Lippmann, R.F. (2003). Students' Understanding of Measurement and

Uncertainty in the Physics Laboratory: Social construction, underlying concepts, and quantitative analysis. Maryland: Department of Physics, University of Maryland.

Lorenzo. T, Danny B. Yang, E.J., Alexander and Christoph, B. (2005). Tracking and Modeling Non-Rigid Objects.Computer Science Department

Mechanical Engineering Department Stanford: University Stanford.

Lublin, Jacki. (2003). Generic Objective and Transferable Skill. Tersedia pada www.ucd.ie/teaching/printable docs/goods%20practice% /generic obj&transfer skill. pdf. Diakses tanggal 24 Maret 2010.

(6)

Martin, Jhonathan. (1993). Literacy in science: Learning to handle text as technology. Literacy and discursive power (pp. 166–202).Pittsburgh. University of Pittsburgh Press.

Masnur Muslich. (2007). KTSP pembelajaran berbasis kompetensi dan

komtekstual panduan bagi guru, kepala sekolah, dan pengawas sekolah. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

McDermott, L.C. (1990). “A Perspective on Teacher Praparation in Physics and Other Sciences : The Need for Special Science Course for Teacher”. American Journal of Physics. 58 (6) 56-61.

______.(1996). Physics By Inquiry, An Introduction to physics and the Physical Sciences. Vol I, New York : John Wiley & Sons Inc.

_______. (2000). “Preparing Teacher to teach Physics and Physical Science by

Inquiry”.Journal Physics Education. 35 (6), 411-416.

Mayer, R. E. (1999). Designing instruction for constructivist learning. London: Sage Publication Ltd.

Moore, G. (1999). Writing Test Item To Evaluate Higher Order Thinking. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Morrison, D., & Collins, A. (1996). Epistemic fluency and constructivist learning environments. Rich environments for active learning in the higher education classroom.

Murphy,H. (1997). The role of instructional variables in conceptual change in high school physics topics. Journal of Research In ScienceTeaching. 31(9). 933-946.

National Research Council, (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Science Council. (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academic Press. Tersedia dalam http://www.nap.edu/books/0309064767/html/.

NCVER (National Centre for Vocacional Education Research). (2003). Fostering Generic skill in VET program and workplace. NCVER, Adelaide.

(7)

NCVER (National Centre for Vocacional Education Research). 2003a. Defining generic skills: At a Glance. NCVER, Adelaide. Tersedia pada

www.ncver.edu.au/research/proj/nr20102b2.pdf.

Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1985). Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Novodvorsky, I. (2006). Shift in beliefs and thinking of a beginning physics teacher. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online. 3(3). 11-17. Tersedia dalam : http://www.phy.ilstu. edu/ jpteo

National Science Teacher Association. (2012). Standards for Science Teacher Preparation. National Science Teacher Association: New York.

National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Nurhadi. (2002). Pendekatan Kontekstual. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Oman, R., & Oman, D. (1997). How to solve physics problems. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies.

Unibersitas Pendidikan Indonesia. (2011). Pedoman penulisan karya ilmiah. UPI.Bandung. Tidak dipublikasikan.

Perkin, D. N., & Unger, C. (1999). Teaching and learning for understanding. Open University Press.

Popov, O. (2006). Developing outdor activities and a website as resources to stimulate learning physics in teacher education.Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online. 3(3). 18-23.

Professional Standard Council. (2004). The Nature of Soft Skills. Tersedia: http://www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/lawlink.

Priyatno, D. (2009). Lima Jam Belajar dengan olah data SPSS 16. Andi Yogyakarta.

Pumphrey, J. & Slater, J. (2002). An Assessment of Generic Skills Needs. Notingham: Department for Education and Skills

(8)

Ramsey, J. (1993). Reform Movement Implication Social Responsibility.Journal Science Education, Vol. 77 No. 2 (pp. 235-258)

Reif, F & Allen, S (1992). Coqnition for interpreting scientific concepts: A studi of accleration. Coqnition and instruction. 9 (1), 1-44

Reif, Wenning. (2008). Selfmonitoring to minimize student resistance to inquiry. Washington Community High School, Washington, IL. 61571, USA

Rankin, L. (2006). Lessons learned: Addressing common misconceptions about inquiry, in Foundations, Vol. 2, Inquiry Thoughts, Views, and Strategies for the K-5

Renner, J.W. dan Lawson, A.E. (1987). Promoting Intellectual Development

Through Science Teaching”. Journal The Physics Teacher. 11 (5) 113-120.)

Riesbeck, C. K. (1996). Strategies to promote critical thinking: training students’

mind & improving their intellect to become informed members of society. Journal of College Science Teaching. 28(3). 203-207.

Richard R. Hake. (1998). Interactive engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses, American Journal Physcis. 66, 64-74,

http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~sdi/.

Robert J. Beichner.(1996). The impact of video motion analysison kinematics graph interpretation skills. North Carolina State University:Physics Department.

Rosenblatt, R & Hecker, A.F. (2011). Systematic study of student understanding of the relationships between the directions of force, velocity and

accleration in one dimention. Phys. Rev. St Phys, Educ. Res. 7, 020112.

Shaffer, P.S and Mc. Demott, L.C. (2005). A Research-based approach to improving students understanding of vector nature of kinematical concept. Am.J.Physics, 73(10), 921-931

Sagala, S. (2006). Konsep dan Makna Pembelajaran. Bandung: CV Alfabeta.

(9)

Santyasa, I W. (2004). Kecakapan hidup dalam pengembangan kurikulum fisika SMA. Makalah. Disajikan dalam Konvensi Nasional Pendidikan Indonesia (Konaspi) V, Tanggal 5-9 Oktober 2004.

Savinainen, A., & Scott, P.( 2002). Using the force concept inventory to monitor student learning and to plan teaching. Journal ofPhysics Education, 37(1). 53-58.

Schamel, D., & Ayres, M. P. (1992). The minds-on approach: Student creativity and personal involvement in the undergraduate science laboratory. Journal of Collage Science Teaching, 21. 226-229.

Schell, J.W. (2001). An Emerging Framework for Contextual Teaching and Learning in Preservice Teacher Education. Tersedia dalam .http://www.coe.uga.edu/ctl/theory/framework.pdf.

Schulz, R., & Mandzuk, D. (2005). Learning to teach, learning to inquire: A 3 year study of teacher candidates’ experiences. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(3), 315-331

Schwartz, R.S. & Lederman, N.G. (2002). “It’s the nature of the beast”: The infl

uence of knowledge and intentions on learning and teaching nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 205-236.

Sidharta. (2008). Model Pembelajaran Asam Basa Berbasis Inkuiri Laboratorium Sebagai Wahana Pendidikan Sains Siswa SMP . Jurnal Pendidikan Inovatif , 3(2), 1-5.

Simon, H. A. (1996). The science of the artificial. Third edition. London: The MIT Press.

Slavin. (1995). Cooperative learning. Tokyo: Allyn and Bacon

Sokoloff, D. R. (1998). Assessing student learning of Newton’s laws: The force

and motion conceptual evaluation and the evaluation of active learning laboratory and lecture curricula. American Journal of Physics, 66, 338

Steinbach, R.(2002). Successful lifelong learning. Alih bahasa: Kumala Insiwi Suryo. Jakarta: PPM.

Sugiyono. (2010) Metode penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan R&D. Alfa Beta Bandung.

(10)

Sunarno. (2009) . Pembelajaran metode eksperimen dan inkuiri terbimbing ditinjau dari sikap ilmiah dan kemampuan dalam menggunakan alat ukur , studi kasus pembelajaran fisika untuk meningkatkan prestasi belajar materi suhu dan kalor pada siswa kelas x sma negeri 2 Pati, tahun pelajaran 2008/2009. Tesis. tidak dipublikasikan

Suryanto.(2002).Penggunaan masalah kontekstual dalam pembelajaran Fisika. Makalah disajikan pada pidato pengukuhan guru besar Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Team FKIP Unsri (2010). Silabus Dan Deskripsi Mata Kuliah Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam. Tidak dipublikasikan

Teachnet. (2007). What is contextual teaching and learning. Diambil pada tanggal 6 Januari 2014, dari http://www.cew.wiscos.edu/teachnet/ctl/

Tipler, P. (1991). Physics for scinentis and Engineers, Third edition. Worth publiser. Inc.

Thiagrarajan, S.,Semmel,D.S.,& Semmel,M. (1974) .Instructional Development for Teacher of Exeptional Children. Sorce Book. Blomminton. Center For innovation on teaching the Handiccaped.

Thornton, R.K & Sokoloff, D.R. (1998) . Assesing student learning of Newton’s laws “ The force and motion conceptual evaluation and the evaluation of active learning laboratory and lacture curiccula. Am.J.Phys., 66(4), 338-352

Trowbridge D. & McDermott, L. C. (1991). Investigation of student

understanding of the concept of acceleration in one dimension. American Journal of Physics, 49(3), 242.

Usmeldi. (2012). Pembelajaran fisika teknik berbasis kegiatan laboratprium untuk meningkatkan kemampuan generik fisika mahasiswa. Proceeding seminar nasional IPA III, Prodi Pendidikan IPA UNNES. thn 2012)). Tidak diterbitkan

(11)

Woolnough, B. E. (1983), Exercise investigations and experiences, Journal Physics Education, 18: 60- 63.

Wenning, C. J. (2005 ). Minimizing resistenace to enquiry-oriented instruction: The infortance of climate setting. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online. 3(2). 10-15. Tersedia dalam: http://www.phy.ilstu. edu/ jpteo

Wenning, C. J. (2006). A pramework for teaching the nature of science. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online. 3(3). 3- 10. Tersedia dalam: http://www.phy.ilstu. edu/ jpteo

Wenning, C. J. (2008 Dealing more effectively with alternative conceptions in science. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online 5(1) . 11-19

Wenning, C. J., & Wenning, R. E. 2006. A generic model for inquiryoriented lab in postsecondary introductory physics. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online. 3(3). 24-33. Tersedia dalam: http://www.phy.ilstu. edu/jpteo

Wenning, C.J. & Khan, M.A. (2011). Sample learning sequences based on the Levels of Inquiry Model of Science Teaching. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 6(2), 17-30.

Wenning, C.J. (2005a). Levels of inquiry: Hierarchies of pedagogical practices and inquiry processes. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 2(3), 3-11

Wenning, C.J. (2005b). Implementing inquiry-based instruction in the science classroom: A new model for solving the improvement-of practice problem. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 2(4), 9-15

Wenning. C.J. (2011). “The levels of inquiry model of sciense teaching : Learning

Sequences to Lesson Plans”. Journal Physics Teacher Education. Tersedia dalam http://phy.istu.edu/publications/minimizing resistance.pdf

Wenning, C, (2011) “Experimental inquiry in introductory physics courses” journal of physics teacher education online . 2 (6), 2-16.

Wenning, C, (2012). The Levels of Inquiry Model of Science Teaching

(12)

William, G.( 2005). Physics teachers should put pen to paper and write history. Journal Phyisics Education. 40(3). 212-220. On line http://www.iop.org/ Ej/ journal/ Phys Ed

Willis, J. (2000). The maturing of constructivist instruction design: Some basic principles that can guide practice. Journal Educational Technology, 40(1). 5-16.

Wright, Lynne.(2004). Integrating Generic Skills into Curriculum. Tersedia dalam Cedir.ouw.edu.au./cedir/overview/overview 4n2/wright.

Yerushalmi, E., & Magen, E. (2006). Preparing teachers to teach physics and physical science by inquiry, Journal Physics Education. 35, 411.

Yulaelawaty, E. (2002). Karakteristik pembelajaran MIPA berdasarkan kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi. Makalah. Disajikan pada seminar pembelajaran MIPA di FPMIPA IKIP Negeri Singaraja. Tidak diterbitkan

Yeung, A. S., Ng, Chistina, Liu, W, P. (2007). Generic Capabilities for Lifelong Education: Conceptualization and Construct Validity. Australian

Association for Research in Education, Fremantle.

Zhaoyao, M. (2002). Physics education for the 21st century: avoiding a crisis. Journal Physics Education, 37(1). 7-8.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Pembelajaran tentang prinsip dasar peta dan pemetaan bagi siswa SMA pada mata pelajaran geografi saat ini terbatas dengan menggunakan media buku teks pelajaran,

Sasaran Bantuan Beasiswa adalah peserta didik dari kalangan siswa yatim dan du’afa yang tercatat aktif dan masih duduk di bangku sekolah ( SD, SMP, SMU / SMK ) agar tidak

Menurut Stuart (2005), stres pada lansia merupakan kondisi ketidakseimbangan, tekanan atau gangguan yang tidak menyenangkan, yang terjadi pada seluruh tubuh dan

Sebuah skripsi yang diajukan untuk memenuhi salah satu syarat memperoleh gelar Sarjana Ekonomi pada Fakultas Pendidikan Ekonomi dan Bisnis. © HAQIE ALAIK

Tujuan Penelitian ini adalah untuk menentukan laju pertumbuhan vegetatif tanaman krisan pada penambahan cahaya lampu LED merah secara siklik selama 30 hari dan

Serat batang pisang merupakan jenis serat yang berkualitas baik, dan merupakan salah satu bahan potensial alternatif yang dapat digunakan sebagai filler pada

Tujuan dari pengaplikasian minus one test pada perlakuan pemupukan adalah untuk mengetahui unsur yang menjadi faktor pembatas pertumbuhan dan produksi antosianin

Tulisan ini dapat dijadikan sebagai bahan masukan informasi awal dalam bidang ilmu hukum bagi kalangan akademisi guna mengetahui lebih lanjut tentang penerapan sanksi atau