The authors wish to thank the participants at the International Conference on eGovern- ment (ICEG) 2005 mini-track on e-government adoption for their useful comments on earlier versions of this chapter. They also wish to thank the Editor-In-Chief, the Guest Editor and the three anonymous reviewers of the International Journal of Electronic Government Research (IJEGR, 2006, Vol. 2, Issue 3) for their insightful comments and suggestions. They finally wish to thank Professors Suzanne Rivard and Alain Pinsonneault for their valuable input and recommendations.
References
Abhichandani, T., & Horan, T.A. (2006). Toward a new evaluation model of e-government satisfaction: Results of structural equation modeling. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Americas Conference on Information Systems (pp. 249-257).
Allard-Poesi, F. (2003). Coder les données in Conduire un projet de recherche, Une perspec- tive qualitative, Coordonné par Y. Giordano, Éditions EMS.
Andersen, K.V., & Henriksen, H.Z. (2005). The first leg of e-government research: Domains and applications areas 1998-2003. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 1(4), 26-44.
Andersen, K.V., & Henriksen, H.Z. (2006). E-government maturity models: Extension of the Layne and Lee model. Government Information Quarterly, 23, 236-248.
Barki, H., & Pinsonneault, A. (2005). A model of organizational integration, implementation effort, and performance. Organization Science, 16(2), 165-179.
Barnes, S.J., & Vigden, R.T. (2003). Assessing the quality of a cross-national e-government Web site: A case study of the forum on strategic management knowledge exchange.
In Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp.
1-10).
Barua, A., Lee, C.H.S., & Whinston, A.B. (1996). The calculus of reengineering. Informa- tion System Research, 7(4) 409-428.
Becker, M.C., Knudsen, T., & March, J.G. (2006). Schumpeter, winter, and the sources of novelty. Industrial and Corporate Change, 15(2), 353-371.
Bélanger, F., & Carter, L. (2005). Trust and risk in e-government adoption. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Americas Conference on Information Systems, Omaha, Nebraska, (pp. 1955-1964).
Boynton, A.C., Zmud, R.W., & Jacobs, G.C. (1994). The influence of IT management practice on IT use in large organizationa. MIS Quarterly, 18(3), 299-318.
Bretschneider, S., & Wittmer, D. (1993). Organizational adoption of microcomputer technol- ogy: The role of sector. Information Systems Research, 4(1), 88-108.
Ttah & Bark
Bygstad, B., Lanestedt, G., & Choudrie, J. (2007). Successful broadband projects in the public sector: A service innovation perspective. In Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 103b-109).
Cahill, M. (2006). Establishing a new vision for BPR in a large, complex, public sector organisation. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Americas Conference on Information Systems (pp. 2371-2374).
Carter, L., & Bélanger, F. (2004). Citizen adoption of electronic government initiatives.
In Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (p.
50119c-501129).
Carter, L., & Bélanger, F. (2005). The utilization of e-government services: Citizen trust, innovation and acceptance. Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 5-25.
Caudle, S.L., Gorr, W.L., & Newcomer, K.E. (1991). Key information systems management issues for the public sector. MIS Quarterly, 15(2), 171-188.
Chan, C. M. L. & Pan, S.-L. (2006). Resource enactment in the e-government systems imple- mentation: A case study on the e-file system. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Information Systems (pp. 483-498).
Chan, C. M. L., Pan, S.-L., & Tan, C. (2003). Managing stakeholder relationships in an e-government project. In Proceedings of the 9th Americas Conference on Information Systems (pp. 783-791).
Chan, C.M.L., & Pan, S.L. (2003). Managing stakeholder relationships in an e-government project. Paper presented at the Ninth Americas Conference on Information Systems (pp. 783-791).
Chen, C.D., Fan, Y.W., & Farn, C.K. (2007). Investigating factors affecting the adoption of electronic toll collection: A transaction cost economics perspective. In Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 107a-116).
Chircu, A.M., & Hae-Dong Lee, D. (2003). Understanding IT investments in the public sec- tor: The case of e-government. Paper presented at the Ninth Americas Conference on Information Systems (pp. 792-800).
Ciborra, C. (2005). Interpreting e-government and development. Efficiency, transparency or governance at a distance? Information Technology and People, 18(3), 260-279.
Cohen, M.D., & Bacdayan, P. (1994). Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: Evidence from a laboratory study. Organization Science, 5(4), 554-568.
Cohen, S., & Eimicke, W. (2003). The future of e-government: A project of potential trends and issues. In Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sci- ences (pp. 146-156).
Conklin, W.A. (2007). Barriers to adoption of e-government. In Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 98-105).
Coursey, D.H., Welch, E.W., & Pandey, S.K. (2005). Organizational determinants of inter- nally perceived Website effectiveness in state health and human service agencies. In Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp.
135-145).
Danziger, J.M. (2004). Innovation in innovation? The technology enactment framework.
Social Science Computer Review, 22(1), 100-110.
E-Government Adopton and Acceptance Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of
information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
Davison, R.M., Wagner, C., & Ma, L.C.K. (2005). From government to e-government: A transition model. Information Technology & People, 18(3), 280-299.
Dawes, S. S., Pardo, T. A., & Creswell, A. M. (2003). Designing government information access programs: A holistic approach. In Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 146-154).
Dawes, S.S., Pardo, T.A., & Creswell, A. M. (2003). Designing government information access programs: A holistic approach. In Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 146-154).
Doellman, T., Allen. J., & Powell, A. (2006). Perceptions of online voting: New voters and senior citizens. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Americas Conference on Information Systems (pp. 2352-2356).
Drake, D.B., Stecklem, N.A., & Koch, M.J. (2004). Information sharing in and across government agencies. The role and influence of scientist, politician and bureaucratic subcultures. Social Science Computer Review, 22(1), 67-84.
Du Gay, P. (2003). The tyranny of the epochal: Change, epochalism and organizational reform. Organization, 10(4), 663-684.
Du Gay, P. (2004). Against ‘enterprise’ (but not against ‘enterprise,’ for that would make no sense). Organization, 11(1), 37-57.
Dubauskas, N. (2005). Business compliance to changing privacy protections. In Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 134-143).
Dunleavy, P., & Margets, H. (2000). The advent of digital government: Public bureaucracy and the state in the Internet age. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Political Science Association, Washington.
Ebrahim, Z., Irani, Z., & Al Shawi, S. (2004). A strategic framework for e-government adop- tion in public sector organisations. In Proceedings of the Tenth Americas Conference on Information Systems (pp. 1116-1125).
Eisenhardt, K.M., & Martin, J.A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105-1121.
Esteves, J., & Joseph, R. (2006). Developing a framework for the assessment of egovern- ment initiatives. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Americas Conference on Information Systems, (pp. 2325-2332).
Fedorowicz, J., Gogan, J. L., Gelinas, U.J., Jr., & Williams, C. (2004). E-government, e- procurement, and e-payments: Data sharing issues associated with an appreciating database. In Proceedings of the Tenth Americas Conference on Information Systems (pp. 995-1002).
Feldman, M.S., & Pentland, B.T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 94-118.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intentions and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
0 Ttah & Bark
Fulla, S., & Welch, E. (2002). Framing virtual interactivity between government and citizens:
A study of feedback systems in the Chicago police department. In Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 125-135).
Gallant, L.M., Culnan, M.J., & McLoughlin, P. (2007). Why people e-file (or don’t e-file) their income taxes. In Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 107b-112).
Gant, J.P., & Burley Gant, D. (2001). Web portals and their role in e-government. In Proceed- ings of the Seventh Americas Conference on Information Systems (pp. 1617-1623).
Gasco, M. (2003). New technologies and institutional change in public administration.
Social Science Computer Review, 21(1), 6-14.
Gauld, R. (2007). Public sector information system project failures: Lessons from a New Zealand hospital organization. Government Information Quarterly, 24, 102-114.
Gefen, D., Pavlou P.A., Warkentin, M., & Gregory, M.R. (2002). Egovernment adoption.
In Proceedings of the Eighth Americas Conference on Information Systems (pp. 569- 576).
Gilbert, D., Balestrini, P., & Littleboy, D. (2004). Barriers and benefits in the adoption of e-government. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 14(4), 286- 301.
Golden, W., Hughes, M., & Scott, M. (2003). The role of process evolution in achieving citizen centered e-government. In Proceedings of the Ninth Americas Conference on Information Systems (pp. 801-810).
Goodhue, D.L. (1995). Understanding user evaluations of information systems. Manage- ment Science, 41(12), 1827-1844.
Grönlund, A. (2003). Emerging electronic infrastructures. Social Science Computer Review, 21(1), 55-72.
Grönlund, A. (2005a). What’s in a field: Exploring the egovernment domain. In Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 125-132).
Grönlund, A. (2005b). State of the art in e-gov research: Surveying conference publications.
International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 1(4), 1-25.
Gupta, M.P., & Jana, D. (2003). E-government evaluation: A framework and case study.
Government Information Quarterly, 20, 365-387.
Hannan, M.T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49, 149-164.
Henderson, J.C., & Schilling, D.A. (1985). Design and implementation of decision support systems in the public sector. MIS Quarterly, 9(2), 157-169.
Henderson, R.M., & Clark, K.B. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of ex- isting product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 9-30.
Henriksen, H. Z., Mahnke, V., & Meiland, J. H. (2004). Public e-procurement: Economic and political rationality. In Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 50124-50132).
E-Government Adopton and Acceptance Hinnant, C. C. & Welch, E. W. (2003). Managerial capacity and digital government in the
States: Examining the link between self-efficacy and perceived impacts of IT in public organizations. In Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1-9).
Hinnant, C.C., & Welch, E.W. (2003). Managerial capacity and digital government in the states: Examining the link between self-efficacy and perceived impacts of IT in public organizations. In Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1-9).
Ho, A.T.K. (2002). Reinventing local governments and the e-government initiative. Public Administration Review, 62(4), 434-444.
Holden, S.H., Norris, D.F., & Fletcher, P.D. (2003). Electronic government at the grass roots:
Contemporary evidence and future trends. In Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 134-140).
Homburg, V., & Bekkers, V. (2002). The back-office of e-government (managing informa- tion domains as political economies). In Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
Huang, J.C. (2003). Usability of e-government Web-sites for people with disabilities. In Pro- ceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
Hung, S.Y., Chang, C.M., & Yu, T.Y. (2006). Determinants of user acceptance of the e-govern- ment services: The case of online tax filing and payment system. Government Information Quarterly, 23, 97–122.
Jaeger, P.T. (2003). The endless wire: E-government as global phenomenon. Government Information Quarterly, 20, 323-331.
Jaeger, P.T. (2006). Assessing section 508 compliance on federal e-government Web sites:
A multi-method, user-centered evaluation of accessibility for persons with disabilities.
Government Information Quarterly, 23, 169-190.
Jain, A., & Patnayakuni, R. (2003). Public expectations and public dcrutiny: An sgenda for tesearch in the context of e-government. Paper presented at the Ninth Americas Confer- ence on Information Systems (pp. 811-820).
Jansse, M., & Joha, A. (2006). Governance of shared services in public administration. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Americas Conference on Information Systems (pp. 2306- 2314).
Kallinikos, J. (2003). Work, human agency and organizational forms: An anatomy of fragmen- tation. Organization Studies, 24(4), 595-618.
Kallinikos, J. (2004). The social foundations of the bureaucratic order. Organization, 11(1), 13-36.
Kawalek, P., & Wastall, D. (2005). Pursuing radical transformation in information age gov- ernment: case studies using the sprint methodology. Journal of Global Information Management, 13(1), 79-101.
Ke, W., & Wei, K.K. (2004). Understanding of e-government development: A case study of Singapore e-government. In Proceedings of the Tenth Americas Conference on Infor- mation Systems (pp. 617-625).
Ttah & Bark
Kim, H. J. & Bretschneider, S. (2004). Local government information technology capacity:
An exploratory theory. In Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (pp. 1-10).
Kraemer, K.L., & Leslie King, J. (2003). Information technology and administrative reform:
Will the time after e-government be different? CRITO, Center for research on informa- tion technology and organizations. Retrieved August 27, 2007, from http://www.crito.
uci.edu.
Lakshmi, M., Holstein, W.K., & Adams, R.B. (1990). EIS: It can work in the public sector.
MIS Quarterly, 14(4), 435.
Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing fully functional e-government: A four stage model.
Government Information Quarterly, 18, 122-136.
Lee, D.H.-D. (2005). Contextual IT business value and barriers: An e-government and e- business perspective. In Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 221-234).
Lee, J., & Kim, J. (2007). Grounded theory analysis of e-government initiatives: Explor- ing perceptions of government authorities. Government Information Quarterly, 24, 135-147
Lee, J.K., & Rao, H.R. (2003). A study of customer’s trusting beliefs in government-to- customer online services. Paper presented at the Ninth Americas Conference on Information Systems (pp. 821-826).
Lee, J.K., & Rao, H.R. (2007). Understanding socio-technical environments for acceptance of inter-agency anti/counter-terrorism information sharing systems. In Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 98-106).
Lee, J.K., Braynov, S., & Rao, H.R. (1993). Effects of a public emergency on citizens’ usage intention toward e-government: A study in the context of war in Iraq. In Proceedings of the Twenty Fourth Internationl Conference on Information Systems (pp. 896-902).
Lee, J.K., Kim, D.J., & Rao, H.R. (2005). An examination of trust effects and pre-existing relational risks in e-government services. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Americas Conference on Information Systems, Omaha, Nebraska, (pp. 1949-1954).
Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 111-125.
Levina, N., & Ross, J.W. (2003). From the vendor’s perspective: Exploring the value propo- sition in information technology outsourcing. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 331-364.
Luna-Reyes, L.F., Gil-Garcia. J.R., & Cruz, C.B. (2006). Collaborative digital government in Mexico: Some lessons from federal Web-based inter-organizational information integration initiatives. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Americas Conference on Infor- mation Systems (pp. 2375-2384).
Marche, S., & McNiven, J.D. (2003). E-government and e-governance: The future isn’t what it used to be. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 20(1), 74-86.
Margetts, H., & Dunleavy, P. (2002). Cultural barriers to e-government. National Audit Office (HC 704-III) in conjunction with the Value for Money report “Better Services Through E-Government” (HC 704).
E-Government Adopton and Acceptance Melitski, J., Holzer, M., Kim, S.-T., Kim, C.-G., & Rho, S.-Y. (2005). Digital government
worldwide: An e-government assessment of municipal Web sites. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 1(1), 1-19.
Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1995a). Complementarities and fit: Strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 19, 179-208.
Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1995b). The economics of modern manufacturing: Reply. The American Economic Review, 85(4), 997-999.
Moon, M. J., Welch, E. W., & Wong, W. (2005). Wha drives global e-governance? An exploratory study at a macro level. In Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 131-139).
Moon, M.J. (2002). The evolution of e-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality.
Public Administration Review, 62(4), 424-433.
Moon, M.J., & Bretschneider, S. (2002). Does the perception of red tape constrain IT in- novation in organizations? Unexpected results from simultaneous equation model and implications. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(2), 273-291.
Ni, A.Y., & Bretschneider, S. (2005). Why does state government contract out their e-govern- ment services? In Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 130c-140).
Norris, D. F. (2005). E-government at the American grassroots: Future trajectory. In Proceed- ings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 125b-129).
Norris, D.F., & Lloyd, D.A. (2006). The scholarly literature on e-government: Characterizing a nascent field. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 2(4), 40-56.
Norris, D.F., & Moon, M.J. (2005). Advancing e-government at the grassroots: Tortoise or hare? Public Administration Review, 65(1), 64-75.
Northrop, A. (2003). E-government: The URBIS cities revisited? CRITO, Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations. Retrieved August 27, 2007, from http://
www.crito.uci.edu
Pardo, T. A., Cresswell, A. M., Dawes, S. S., & Burke, G. B. (2004). Modeling the social and technical processes of interorganizational information integration. In Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 50120-10127).
Pardo, T., & Scholl, H.J. (2002). Walking atop the cliffs: Avoiding failure and reducing risk in large scale e-government projects. In Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1656-1665).
Park, H.M. (2005). A cost-benefit analysis of the Seoul OPEN system: Policy lessons for elec- tronic government projects. In Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 126b-135).
Pentland, B.T., & Rueter, H.H. (1994). Organizational routines as grammars of action.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(3), 484-510.
Ttah & Bark
Perrow, C. (1986). Complex organizations: A critical essay (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill Publish- ing Company.
Phang, C.W., & Kankanhalli, A. (2005). A research framework for citizen participation via e-consultation. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Americas Conference on Information Systems, Omaha, Nebraska, (pp. 2003-2010).
Phang, C.W., Sutanto J., Li, Y., & Kankanhalli, A. (2005). Senior citizens’ adoption of e-gov- ernment: In quest of the antecedents of perceived usefulness. In Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (p. 130a).
Pieterson, W., Ebbers, W., & van Dijk, J. (2007). Personalization in the public sector an inventory of organizational and user obstacles towards personalization of electronic services in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 24, 148–164.
Pinsonneault, A., & Kraemer, K.L. (2002). Exploring the role of information technology in organizational downsizing: A tale of two American cities. Organization Science, 13(2), 191-208.
Radio Canada. (2003). Québec met fin au projet Gires. Retrieved August 27, 2007, from http://
radio-canada.ca/nouvelles/Index/nouvelles/200309/30/012-gires-abandon-rb.shtml.
Reddick, C.G. (2006). Information resource managers and E-government effectiveness: A survey of Texas state agencies. Government Information Quarterly, 23, 249–266.
Robey, D., & Holmström, J. (2001). Transforming municipal governance in global context:
A case study of the dialectics of social change. Journal of Global Information Tech- nology Management, 4(4), 19-31.
Robey, D., & Sahay, S. (1996). Transforming work through information technology: A comparative case study of geographic information systems in county government.
Information Systems Research, 7(1), 93-110.
Roy, J. (2005). Service, security, transparency & trust: Government online or governance renewal in Canada? International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 1(1), 40-58.
Samuelson, P.A. (1974). Complementarity: An essay on the 40th anniversary of the Hicks-Allen revolution in demand theory. Journal of Economic Literature, 12(4), 1255-1289.
Saxton, M.L., Naumer, C.M., & Fisher, K.E. (2007). 2-1-1 information services: Outcomes assessment, benefit-cost analysis, and policy issues. Government Information Quar- terly, 24, 186-215.
Scatolini, E., & Cordella, A. (2005). Technological artifacts and sense making in an Italian public administration. Paper presented at the 21st European Group for Organisational Studies (EGOS) Colloquium, Berlin.
Schedler, K., & Scharf, M.C. (2000). Exploring the interrelations between electronic gov- ernment and the new public management. A managerial framework for electronic government. Switzerland: Institute for Public Services and Tourism at the University of St. Gallen.
Schildt, K. & Beaumaster, S. (2004) Strategic information technology management: The city of Anaheim technological initiatives. In Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (pp. 50121a-50130a).
E-Government Adopton and Acceptance Schildt, K., Beaumaster, S., & Edwards, M. (2005). Strategic information technology man- agement: Managing organizational, political, and technological forces. In Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 126-135).
Scholl, H.J. (2003). E-government: A special case of ICT-enabled business process change.
In Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp.
136-147).
Scholl, H.J. (2005). E-government-induced business process change (BPC): An empirical study of current practices. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 1(2), 27-49.
Shackleton, P., Fisher, J., & Dawson, L. (2004). Evolution of local government e-services:
The applicability of e-business maturity models. In Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 50120-50128).
Siau, K., & Long, Y. (2004). Factors impacting e-government development. Paper presented at the Twenty-Fifth International Conference on Information Systems (pp. 221-234).
Sorrentino, M. (2005). Reconceptualizing resistance to change: A case of IT implementation in a local authority. Paper presented at the 21st European Group for Organisational Studies (EGOS) Colloquium, Berlin.
Srivastava, S.C., & Teo, T.S.H. (2006a). Facilitators for e-government development: An application of the technology-organization-environment framework. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Americas Conference on Information Systems (pp. 2315-2324).
Srivastava, S.C., & Teo, T.S.H. (2006b). Determinants and impact of e-government and e-business devlopment: A glabal perspective. Paper presented at the Twenty-Seventh International Conference on Information Systems (pp. 1-18).
Stokes, J., & Clegg, S. (2003). Once upon a time in the bureaucracy: Power and public sector management. Organization, 9(2), 225-247.
Tan, C.W., Pan, S.L, & Lim, E.T.K. (2005). Towards the restoration of public trust in elec- tronic governments: A case study of the e-filing system in Singapore. In Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 126-135).
Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic manage- ment. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
Thong, J.Y.L., Yap, C.S., & Seah, K.L. (2000). Business process reeingineering in the public sector: The case of the housing development board in Singapore. Journal of Manage- ment Information Systems, 17(1), 245-270.
Tolbert, C.J., & Mossberger, K. (2006). The effects of e-government on trust and confidence in government. Public Administration Review, 3, 354-369.
Tranfield, D., Duberley, J., Smith, S., Musson, G., & Stokes, P. (2000). Organizational learning: It’s just routine. Management Decision, 38(4), 253-260.
Treiblmaier, H., Pinterits, A., & Floh, A. (2004). Antecedents of the adoption of e-payment services in the publicsSector. Paper presented at the Twenty-Fifth International Con- ference on Information Systems (pp. 65-76).
UNDP (2001). Human development report 2001: Making new technologies work for human development. Retrieved October 5, 2007, from http://hdr.undp.org/reports/
Ttah & Bark
Ventura, S.J. (1995). The use of geographic information systems in local government. Public Administration Review, 55(5), 461-467.
Waddel, P., & Borning, A. (2004). A case study in digital government: Developing and applying UrbanSim, a system for simulating urban land use, transportation, and en- vironmental impacts. Social Science Computer Review, 22(1), 37-51.
Wang, L., Bretschneider, S., & Gant, J. (2005). Evaluating Web-based e-government ser- vices with a citizen-centric approach. In Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 129-137).
Warkentin, M, Gefen, D., Pavlou, P.A., & Rose, G.M. (2002). Encouraging citizen adoption of e-governement by building trust. Electronic Markets, 12(3), 157-162.
Webster, J., & Watson, R.T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), 13-23.
Weerakkody, V., Choudrie, J., & Currie, W. (2004). Realising e-government in the UK:
Local and national challenges. In Proceedings of the Tenth Americas Conference on Information Systems (pp. 972-980).
Welch, E. W. & Pandey, S. (2005). E-Government and network technologies: Does bureau- cratic red tape inhibit, promote or fall victim to intranet technology implementation?
In Proceedigns of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp.
1-10).
Wheeler, B.C. (2002). NEBIC: A dynamic capabilities theory for assessing net-enablement.
Information Systems Research, 13(2), 125-146.
Whittington, R., & Pettigrew, A.M. (2003). Complementarities thinking. In A.M. Pettigrew, R. Whittington, L. Melin, C. Sanchez-Runde, F. Van den Bosch, W. Ruigrock, et al.
(Eds.), Innovative forms of organizing: International perspectives (pp. 125-132).
London: Sage Publications.
Williams, M. D., & Beynon-Davies, P. (2004). Implementing e-government in the UK: An analysis of local-level strategies. In Proceedings of the Tenth Americas Conference on Information Systems (pp. 1008-1015).
World Bank (2007). World Bank. Retrieved October 5, 2007, from http://web.worldbank.
org
Zahra, S.A., & George G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extention. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203.