By
farthemost important meansnow
availableforthe interpretation oftheculture of the prehistoricPortoRicansisastudy of archeolog- ical objects that are being broughtto lightby
chance discovery or scientificexploration.When
theextenttowhich prehistoric objectsmay
aid us inan interpretation of aboriginallife ismore
generally90 THE ABORIGINES
OFPORTO
RICO [eth.ann. 25 rocognized, additionalefforts willbemade
topreserve suchspecimens for the archeologist. Porto Ricohasl)eenparticularlyfortunatein this regard. Ithas had man\-localstudentswho
have been interested in the aboriginal historj- of the island andmanv more who
have pre- servedrelics,awaiting the timewhen
scientificmen
wouldusethem
in theirstudies.One
finds fewwritings on this subject prior to themiddleof the nineteenthcentury and cancount almost on hisfingersthe published works on Porto Rican archeologyup
to the present time,although severalcollectionsof prehistoric objectsmade
l)vlocalcollectorshave driftedintomuseums
or privatehandsinthe I'nited StatesandEurope
orstill remain ontheisland.The
Latimercollection,whichisthe largest evermade
ontheisland, andhas attracted themost
attention,waspresentedtotheSmithsonian Institutionby George
Latimer. Itwas
described in 187t> by Pro- fessorO.T.Mason,thenestorofAmerican
ethnology. Thispublica- tion,themost complete accountof Porto Rican antiquitieswhich has appeared, stimulated an ever-increasing interest in the subject that was heightened bytheannexation of theisland totheUnitedStates.In 1898,
more
than a quarter of acenturyafterMason's catalogue of theLatimercollection first appearedinprint,owing
to the increaseddemand
for information regarding the antiquities of the island,the Smithsonian Institution reprinteditas Ijcingstillthe bestwork
extant onthesul)ject.The
authorconsiders himself fortunateinbeingabletoincludeinthis articledescriptionsof the objectsintheLatimercollection,andhe hasdrawn
largelyfrom
Professor Mason'swork
inmany
quotationsscat- teredthroughthe following pages.In considering the material
from
PortoRico,when
necessarycom- parative data from otherislands,as SantoDomingo
and the Lesser Antilles,have beenintroduced. PortoRicowasthecenter ofan Antil- leanculture but thesame
or analliedculturewas foundinneighboring- islands,so that it isnot wellat present to limit thisreporttoPorto Rico,notwithstandingthe relatively greatsizeofcollectionsfrom
that island.It is unfortunate in
some ways
that the exact localitieswhere the objectswere foundcan not be stateddefinitely,and itisequallytobe regretted thatwe
donotknow
accuratelywhether oneortwo
of the specimens were collected in SantoDomingo
or Porto Rico. There were two, perhaps three, different races—
the Carib, theArawak,
and possibly an archaic population of cave dwellers—
in Porto Ricobefore theadventofColumbus. It
may
bepossiblelater todistinguish the objectswhich belongedto each of these different peoples,but at presentitisnot.FEWKES]
ARCHEOLOGICAL
OBJECTS 91The
avcheological objects treated in the followiug desci'iptions include stone implements, three-pointed idols, stone collars, stone headsand masks, amulets,pillarstones,ornamentsof stoneandshell andbonecarvnngs,potterj^,wooden
objects, idolsof stoneand wood, andvariousother specimens. Inthesame
general category arelike- wise included pictographs, or rock etchings, andother archeological evidences of aboriginallifewhich stillremain ontheisland.The
forms,nolessthan the tine technology exhibited intheabove- mentionedgroupsof prehistoric objects,stampthe culture towhich theyowe
theiroriginashighinthescaleof development. Suchtineproductscould nothavel)eenthe
work
of an unskilled people. These objects are characteristic, dift'ering essentiallyfrom
those found on theneighboringcontinent,sothatwe may
designate the areainwhich theyoccurasaspecialculturearea, distinctfrom
allothersanddeserv- ing of thespeciticname
by whichithasbeendesignated.This culture reached itshighest developmentinthe
two
islandsof Porto Rico and SantoDomingo,
so that the causeswhich led toits evolutionmust
besoughtinthe insularconditionsunder whichitwas evolved.The
specimensshow
little to indicate their age, but the developmentofa peculiar cultureliketheAntilleanisnot theproduct ofafewyears, butrather of long periods of time, which implies thatman
has inhabited theWest
Indiesfrom
remoteantiquity,longenough to lead togreatspecialization in theartiticialproducts thathave sur- vived him.But
it is also highlyprobable that the ages of these objectsmay
bedifferent,forwhilemany
weredoubtless inusewhen
the islandswere discovered, others,as thestonecollars, had already passed out of useatthat time.Many
so-called prehistoric implementswere doubtless Itrought to Porto RicobyIndianswho
weretransferredfrom
neighboringislands as slaves or b}-thosewho
voluntarilysoughthomes
therefrom
over theseas. In the light of this knowledge it becomes a complicated problemtoreferthese objects to their rightful makers, andwe
have notin ourpossession the dataadequateto solve it inawiiollysatis- factory^manner.Itisremarkable,aswaspointedout byProfessor
Mason
regarding theLatimercollection, that ''thereisnotinallthe collection asingle flakedorchippedimplementor weapon."The same
is true of themany
hundredsofstoneimplementsobtainedIjj^the author,andthus farthere hasnotbeen discovered inPorto Rico evidence of chipped stone,notevena singlearrowhead.The
i-ougheststone objectsfoundshow marks
of polishing.Mr
Frederick A.Ober
states that Doctor Llenas, a physician of Puerto Plata, "describes an aboriginalwork- shophe investigatedina cave intheSantoDomingo
mountains,where hefoundman^-fragmentsofchippedtools,but noperfectspecimens."92
THE ABORIGINES
<>FPORTO
RICOThiswas an importantdiscoveiyand should be followed
up
bylater students of Antillean methodsof stoneworking-. Itshould l>eborne inmind
in this connection that man\' objects aremade
of akindof stoneresemblingjadeite, whichthus farhasnotbeenfoundinsitu in either Haiti or Porto Rico.The
nearest iocalit}^ where the rough materialout ofwhichsome
of the prehistoric objectswere fashioned ot'cursisinSouth America,man}' milesaway, andthese at leastwere notmanufactured onthe islandswhere they werefound.Every
collection of aboriginal objectsfrom
theWest
Indieswhich the author has examined is rich in stone implements, differing in character,size,and form.The
surfaces are either i-ough or highly polished,and, as a rule, the specimens aremade
of a hard volcanic rock,similartothatusedinthemanufactureofidolsandamulets.Various formsof these implementsare well described and figured inProfessorMason'sarticles ontheLatimer and
Guesde
collections, in DoctorStahl'sLos
Indios Borinquenos, andin the various publi- cations ofMr
iraThurn.Mr
liichardQuirk"tiguresanddescribes a scriesofthese objectswhichincludesthemore
strikingformspeculiar totheLesserAntilles.But
while the majority of these stone imple- ments are of Carib origin,the likeness of manj'to the implements usedby
theancient Porto Ricansissoclosethat there can benomis- take in consideringthem
typical of both races. In a generalway
these stone objectsmay
be classified under the following heads:1. Celts; 2. Axes; 3. Paddle-shaped stones: 4. Smoothing stones:
5.
Curved
stones.Celts
The
stone celtsfrom
the Antillesnia_yberoughlyclassifiedasfol- lows: 1. Celts ofalmond
or petal shape, withnoindication of groove ordistinctenlargementforhafting; :2.Axes
orstoneimplements with single cutting edge and notches on opposite rim, generally flat or slightly curved; 3. Celts with head enlai-ged, the diameter being greater than the thickness of the blade, the ends being notched or continuedinto ears; 4. Celtswitli groovesfor hafting, singlecutting- edge, butt or head blunt, sometimes continued into projections.These tj'pes,which varyin essential points,are connected b}-
many
a})errant forms. This classilication isessentiallythat suggested by Professor
Mason
inhisaccountofthe(iuesdecollection.The
celtsof prehistoric Porto Ricogenerallybelongtothe firsttype, thosefrom
theLesserAntillestothe others.The
petaloidceltsare beautifullyshaped and generallyhighlypol- ished.They
are ovalinsectionandcircularor ovate inoutline. In"Carib stoneImplementsinllieHorniman Museum. HdiquaryandJUustratcd Aicheotogisl,\iii, no.3.169-181. Hegivesmanyfigures ofCarib stoneandshellimplements. For additional matter onthissubject secDrH.F.C. ten Kate's articleon West Indian Stone ImplementsandOther Indian Relics, in Bijdruijiiitutde TnalLandenVotkenkundevan NcderlaudsdifIndie,iv.
i-EWKEs]
ARCHEOH)GICAL
OBJECTS93
rare instancesthey are found decorated with carvings of grotesque facesinrelief.The
weaponsofthePorto Ricanswerewooden
clubs, called//uuxmas, or swords pointed atone end,with a cross stick like a sword hilt.They
had also javelins of hard wood, which they threw withgreat force,andbows
andarrows. Although the}' are said to have usedbows
and arrowsderived fromthe Carib,nostonearrow pointshave yetbeen found,anditisprobaV)lethat theseaiTowshadtipsmade
of boneor shark'steeth,or of spines of therayorothertishes.The
his- torian Inigo statesthat theywere skilful inshooting,but that they didnotpoison the points of their spears orarrows,asthe Indians of theOrinocovallev did: the endsof the arrowsof the Porto Ricans were hardenedbytire.Specimens with blades and handles of stone
show
the ordinarymethod
of hafting the prehistoric stonecelts used bythe aboriginalWest
Indians,but all petaloidcelts are destituteof grooves,except onespecimen in a small privatecollection, inwhichagroove iswell marked.While
the majority of theceltsarepointedat one end and rounded ontheiredges,theirlongest axisbeingatright anglestotheir handles,many
aremore
massive,and bluntat both ends. Thereare specimensinwhichthe longest axisisinlinewith the handle.Characteristic stone implements, called
from
their shape paddle- stones,occurinmany
collectionsand appearto have been foundinall theWest
Indies. These haveacircular,triangular,oreven amore
orless rectangularform,terminatinginsome
specimens in a bifur- catedtip. Itwould seem thatsome
of thesemay
have beenusedas ameans
ofcarryinglivecoalsforvarious purposes, suchashollowing out log's in the tii-ststages of canoe making.The
forms of these objectsgradesoimperceptiblyintothose ofceltsprovided withhandles thatinsome
instances it isverydifficulttodistinguish thetwo
t3'pes.A
group of artificiallyworked
stone objects ofunknown
use are called polishing- stones. These have a variety of shapes and vary considerablyin size,some
being quitelarge,othersminute.Many
of these objectswere
sharpenedatone endoratboth ends.The
use ofcurvedstonesislikewiseproblematical.Many
of these aremassive and insome
specimens thecurved extensions arebifur- catedat their extremities.Examples
of this type are figured in several publishedarticlesonWest
Indian stone implements andgood specimensofthetypearerepresentedinProfessorMason'spublications.A number
of paddle-shaped stoneimplements,some
being of con- siderable size,have a circular or a roughlytriangular shape. Their handles are sometimes curved, rarely bifurcated at the pointed end.Stones of thisshape areoften of greencolor,of arock
unknown
on the island,andmay
be thoseimplementsofwhichChai'levoixspeaks ashaving beenbroughtfrom
theAmazon
valley. Inthisgroupmay
94 THE ABORIGINES OF PORTO
RICO [eth.axn.I'o lieclassed certain boot-shaped or crescentic stones ofunknown
use, whicharefoundinseveralcollections. Others belongingto thisgroup
arecalled, forwantofabettername,smoothingstones.Celts
made
of conch shells are verycommon
in Barbados, theBahama
islands,andinsome
oftheLesserAntilles,but veryfewof these objects have been found in the largerWest
Indian islands.Where
thiskindofceltoccurs thereisno hardrockavailable,andtheseimple- ments afford a most instructiveexampleof the effect ofgeological environment onprimitiveart. 1
know
ofonlyone Porto Ricanshell celt—
thatpreserved in the collectionof ^IrYunghannis. Like the Barbadosspecimens,it ismade from
thelipofaconchshell,showing well-markedsigns ofchipping alongitscutting edge.The
specimensfiguredinplate xiillustratethegeneralformsofsmall stonecelts collected in PortoRico.As
will l)enoticed,theyassumemany
shapes— from
that of a chisel to the broad-edged battle-ax.The
endopposite the cuttingedgeisgenerally pointed,jus'tifyingthename
petaloid, but this end is often })lunt, rounded, oreven flat.The
one feature that they all share—
that which distinguishes the true Porto Ricanfrom
theCarib stone ax of StVincent and other islands of the Lesser Antilles—
is the absence of agroove for theattachmentof ahandle. This isnot peculiartoany one
West
Indian island,for petaloid celtsoccurinall islands,from
Trinidad toCuba, inclusive.ItoftenhappensthatthePortoRicanstoneimplementiselongated into achisel-likeinstrument,