from
sketches by the author.A
peculiarly formed rubbing stone of dumb-bell shape, an implement ofimknown
use, is here
shown
(/). Although the pestles represented in this plate are in themain
of thesame
general outline as those already de- scribed, specimens / and j havesomewhat
dif- ferent forms, especiallyA-a bird-shaped pestle, to judgefrom
the head and limbs—
having at)ird face like that of specimen_/'.
One
of the objects (n) is elongated,with pointed head and with indications of alens thatisalxsentfrom
the preceding figures on this plate. Another (r)has the handle swollen
midway
between baseandtip. "'"""" '''"""'"
The
dumb-bell-shaped formsofpestlesshown
in this plate (/./. ///)recallthoserecordedby HoctorHuei-denfromJamaica.
Several stoneimplements.Hgured on plate xxvii, were probablyused, for grinders,but they are different in form from any implements 3^et ii'ferred to.
Some
of these are [x'stles; others depart considerably fromthattype.One
specimen{o)isan almostbell- shaped implement of elongated form, rounded below, its handle terminating in a well-made head;/>has arude head cut on one end.
and /has a conicalheadatthe apex, the base beingHat.
From
thefact that one surface is flattened, speci-men
fjisconsideredtobea polishing stone, an inference which its gen- eralform
also would indicate. Itmay
have been usedinpolishing the surface of potteryhefoi'e tiring or ingrindingpigments or other sub-•<tances. Its general character, as that it isanartificial, nota natural.
.4
Fig.14.Bird-shapedpe*-tlefrom SantoI)<
_ mingo well as the
worn
form.;urface, sliow^
MORTAI;.-
Inhis classificationofmealing implements Professor
Mason
distin- guishesbetween upper and nethermillstones.The
pestlesthat have alreadybeendescribed belongtothe firstgroup: there remainstobe10(i
THE
ABORIGINES OFPORTO
RICO [eth. axx.2."fonsidered thelowerstone,that
upon
whichthe materialtobe g-round is laid. Thismay
havetheform
of amortarormar
besimplyaflat slabof stone.The
formertj'pehas a depressiontohold the material and is used forsubstanceswhich require pounding; the latter,as a rule, has no suchconcavity.Some
mortarsare ornamented bypro- jectionsontheirrims.The
Latimercollection contains afew mortars which havenot yet been figured and threeother specimens, not Porto Ricaninorigin, that have been called mealing stones. These last were probabh- introduced by Spaniards and should not be regarded as prehistoric objects.They
havethe .sameform
andaremade
ofthesamematerial as metates,common
in allpartsofLatinAmerica.The
firstfivemortarsconsideredbyProfessorMason
are aboriginal, as are likewise those in the (luesde collection mentioned by him.These specimens
show
verywell the varietyinform
of theseobjects, butpresentnoessentialdifferencesfrom
thosefoundinCentral,North, andSouth America. Identical metates occur inArizona ruins and wereinuseamong
the ancient pueblos.Although
thethree-legged metates mentioned byProfessorMason
areregardedasimportedby
theSpanishcolonists,itmust
beborneinmind
thatmetatesofthisform
have beenreportedfrom
alltheWest
Indianislands. Thus,DoctorDuei'denspeaks of similar metatesfrom Jamaica,and figurestwo
beautiful specimens, one of which hasan animal'sheadon oneside,the other beautifullj'decoratedlegs. DoctorDuerdcn
callsattention to thefactthat"forms
similartothesetwoarecommonly employed
to-dayinCentralAmerica
forgrinding maizeandnow
andagain aremet
withamongst
the peasantryof Jamaica." It is well to remember,in considering the existenceamong
theWest
Indians of metates so closely resembling the Mexican, that corn formeda considerable proportion of thefoodof theaborigines ofPorto Rico.They
possessed agrindingimplement,consisting of aboardon the surface ofwhich sharpstoneswere attached, forgrating the root of themanioc(Jlanlhotvf-illtissima)inthepreparation of cassava, but thiswas
quiteunlike a stone metateinshape, con.struction,and use.A
metate would be ill adapted forgrinding the root of the manioc, and onthe otherhandthemaniocgraterwouldbe unsuitable foracorn grinder. Maizewas no doubt importedintotheislandfromMexico
or South America, andwithitmay
have beenintroduced the three-legged metates. Benzonigivesan account of themethod ofgrinding maize andmaking
tortillas,accompanied withagoodfigure.The
peasantry of Porto Riconow
generally use a coi'iimillwhichwas
introducedby
theSpaniards. Thismillma\'be seeninoperation inmany
ofthe cabinsintheisolatedmountainregions. Itconsistsoftwo
circular millstones,an upper anda lower,each about a foot in diameterandbothliaxinu'I'adiatinggrooves on oneside likethe stonesFEWKEsl
ARCHEOLOGICAL
OBJECTS107
of iiHourmill.The
lowermillstone rests onthe floorofthe cabin, whereitistemporarilyplaced foruse. Thereis fastenedtothemid- dleofthis stonean iron rod projecting-abovethe surface about an inchand titling intoa holein theupper millstone. Thisholeispar- tiallyclosedb\'awooden
bar inserted into aslotof the upperstone, leaving a spaceoneachsidethrough which the corn to beground isdropped,topassinduecoursebetweenthestones.
On
theupperside of theupperstoneisaneccentricpit,into whichtits arod suspended from theroof of thecabin.When
this primitive mill is setup
for use, thewoman who
works it kneels before themill,grasps the sus- pendedrod,andimpartstoit a rotary movement,causing the upper^>tonetorotateonthe lower, stationary,stone,all thetimefeedingin thecorn that laterescapes between the rims of the millstones inthe formof meal.
This
form
ofmillwasnaturallyadoptedinthose countriesin which themetatewaslittleused. Althoughcorn {Zeamays)isnow
eatenin certainparts ofPorto Kicobythepeonclass,especiallyintheisolated regionsabouttheYunque
and Cacique mountains, wheremillsofthis kind arecommon,
it is probablethatin prehistoric times the rotary millwasunknown,
while the stone metatewas
a favorite implementamong
the people.The
largermortars here describedmay
have been usedascooking- vessels,althoughfrpm
the soot found onsome
of the potsmade
of burnt clay thereis no doubtthat potteryvesselswere emplo3'ed for thepurpose.The
smaller mortarsmay
have been put to suchuses as grindingcondiments, paints,or tobacco leaves, ormaking
sacred meal.The
flat stones,with surfaces not hollowed out, would have served for avariety'of purposes,among
whichmay
have beenbruis- ing plantstoobtainfibersforweavingtextilesofvarious kinds.The
objectsmade
ofgoldwereevidentlyfashioned intoshape byhammer-
ing. This couldhavebeendoneonl}^))y
means
ofstones,forsofarasisknown
theaborigines of Porto Ricowerenot acquainted with theart of smelting gold. Suitable flatstonesmay
haveserved as anvils for beating-goldnuggetsintothedesiredornaments.Severalmortarswerecollected bytheauthorin his visits to Porto Rico, especiallyin 1904. Plate xxviir shows four of theseobjects, three ofwhichclosel}'resembleone another. Littlecanbeadded by description to
what
isshown
inthefigures, except that thespecimens designated«, h,andd
arehollowedout ononeside,while e is flat on topand base,hinting- thatitmav
not have had thesame
use as the other three mortars. Possiblyc was used forgrinding paint, while seeds orherbswereplacedintiiemortarscontainingcavities. Pestles were employed with the latter type,but not with that represented bvc.IDS THE
ABORIGINES OFPOKTO
RICO [eth.ANN. 23Spucimene niio-ht
more
properly becalledastone))o\vlthan amor- tar,althoughitsfunctionmay
have beenthat ofthelatter. Itismade
with great care and shows skill in processes of stoneworking not inferior to that exhibited in the manufacture of stone rings or of thi-ee-pointedidols.Anotherobject./', isafragmentof astonecollarbrokenatthefer- rule, evidentlyputtouse secondarilyasapestle,the
two
extremities showingmarks
of such use. Several specimens of broken collars or of broken three-pointed stones thathave been usedsecondarily as pounding-implementsoccurin alllargecollectionsfrom
PortoRico.PlateXXIX. tiand7).represents theupperand lower surfaces of an (wceptionally tinefragmentof a stonemortarof the
Neumann
collec- tion. Evidentlyit wasoriginally astonetrencher ofci'cscenticform, withliandles ateach end.Whether
this objectwasusedas a mortar or a platterisnot possibletodetermine,butthefact thatitisofstone leadsto the beliefthatithadtheformeruse.The
hemisphericobjectsshown
inthisplate,t;andd,are interpreted asrubbingstones. Theirflatsurfaceissmooth,asifworn
soby
con- stantuse.The
specimen figured as< is one of the finest specimens of stone mortars in the Meriiiocollection. Itsform
iselongated andpointed atoneend,where the rim rises in alowprojection.The
surface of theconcavity closelyfollowsthat of the exterior of thevessel and is fairlysmooth.Plate XXX. If,illustrates atypeof stone implement,several speci-
mens
ofwhich occurincollectionsofprehistoi'icPoi'toRicanobjects, but the function of which isunknown. The
illustration shows the specimen from one of the flattened sides,the l)rcadth being nearly double the thickness.The
base isflatand smooth, andthehandle of aboutthesame
diameter throughout, withthetipsbifurcated,thetwo
extensions or horns being slightlycurved. Various formsof stone impli'inentsofsomewhat
similarcharacter arealsoshown
(fj,c,and/?).The^'are all
more
orlesstriangularin proflle. rounded onthefaces, andmore
orlessflattened.One
edgecommonly
shows evidences of rubt)ing. asif ithad beenused as a polishingimplement.The
speci-mens
aremade
ofdifl'erent kinds of stoneandareasarulerough and undecorated. Specimen"wascollected bytheauthor, whileh. <\and<l areintheLatimercollection.Beads and Pendants
The
caciciue(iuacanagarigavetoColuml)usastring of 800 beads of stone. (Hill, and mentionof these ornaments is frequently foundin early writers. There are several specimens of stone l)eads in theARCHKOLOGICAL
OBJECTS ]OilFi«.1.'>.AniHlet.
Latimercollection,one string containino- 70, which Professor
Mason
thus described:A
string of 70smallchalcedonybeads,about thesizeof peas. Theyare quite per- fectlyrounded andperforated,someofthemin twodirections. This isthemost remarkablesampleofaboriginalstone polishinganddrillingthathas evercome undertheobservationoftiiewriter. Itisexceedingly doubtfulwhetheranother collection ofsomanywitnessestosavage jjatienceandskillhasbeenfoundanywhereinonespecimen.
According- to
Ramon Pane
thewoman
Gua- bonito(g'ood ruler)gavethe heroGuagugiana much
guanine(gold)and cihe,coltclhl (stones),"that he might carry
them
tied to his arms;forin those countries the coleeih!are of stone, very like marble,and they wear
them
aboiit theirwrists andnecks: andthe Guaniniswearthem
at their ears,making
holes inthem when
they are \\ti\o.and they sound like fine mettle."The
above-mentioned string of beads is excelledby onecollected atUtuado by
the author in 1904.The Utuado
specimen (plate XXXI,(i)ismore
than5 feet long,containing several hundred beads, large and small, a worthy giftfrom
a cacique. It was found in a bowl (plate Lxxvir. a.,a'}, evidently sacrificial, and with it were another string, also a fine one,andtwo
pendants, one of .stone,the other of shell. These beadsvary in size but are neverround like thoseinthe stringfirstdescribed above.Many
havelateral perfora- tions,asiffor the insertion of feathers or otherobjects,and insome
specimens the perforation is confined to a simple pit.Another
specimen (c) is one of several stone objects of cylindrical form, with a raised bandmidway
in its length and perforations at the opposite edges.The
raised band in one
known
specimen isdecorated with what reseml)les ahuman
hand. Illustration h repre- sents abrown
nonperforated stone ofunknown
use.Therearc
two
specimensof thisform
inthe collection, one of whichcame
withthe Latimer gift. Specimend
is a spherical stone girt bya groove,having a per- forationthroughan elevationthatis pinchedup
atone pole.A
stringcan be introducedintofigured
toshow
the position ofthis hole.The
objectshown from
frontandsideinfigures15andItimay
pos- siblyberegardedasa pendant,althoughcloseh-relatedtothe frontal amuletslaterconsidered. Itismade
ofawhitestone,possiblvmarl>le, perforatedlaterallyasiffor suspension,havingahuman
figui-ecutin Fig. 16.Amulet(.sideview).
110 THE
ABORIGINES OFPORTO
RICO [kth.ANN.2.-ireliefon oneface. Theseillustrationswere
made from
sketchesgiven totheauthorbyMr W.
F. Willoughbv,treasurer ofFortoRico.Stunk
HallsAmong
themany
objectsfoundnear theso-called jiicgosdehola,or ballcourts, of Porto Ricomay
bementioned certain sphericalstones whichconstantlyoccurin collectionsfrom
this island. These stone ballsvary from thesizeofa marbleto twofeetin diameter.Many
of
them
were undoubtedly naturally formed by running water, and evidentlygatheredfrom
the beds of rivers andcarried to thevillage sitesforapurpose;othersshow
good evidences of having beenmade
sphericalby human
hands.In thecourse of his tra\('ls in PortoRico theauthorcollectedsev- eralstoneballs,astheyarepopularlycalled,ascribedtotheaborigines oftheisland. It isconmionlysupposedthat theseballswereused in a
game
called batey^but as they aremade
of stone,while Oviedo speaksof thehaU'i/ballsasmade
ofakind ofgum,
thisinterpretation evidently does not apply. These lialls, varyingfrom
the sizeof a marbletoseveralinchesindiamet(n'. are, asarule,moderatelysmooth, evenwhen made
of thehardestrock. Whileitisnot impossible that theywere used in games,some
of (iiemwere intended for otherand farditferentpurposes.Thatthese objectswere used bythe Indiansin ball
games
sucli as Oviedodescribescan not be believed,because that author says that elastic balls of vegetable sul)stances, capable of rebounding, were employed in theballgames; but these stones ma}'have been usedin ballgames
of otherItinds,ofwhichwe
have norecord. Theseobjects arcalmostuniversally associatedIn*the country- people with thejuegoit ill-hola.and regardedasofaboriginalmanufacture.Two
other theories of their use are suggested:They may
have been put ontheridge poles of cabins,asliguredby Oviedo,toweightdown
theroofs,or theymay
have beenemployed
asfetishes inceremonials for rain, following awell-knowncustomamong
primitive people.As
llicse stones are found in ornearwater and
nowhere
else,by aeon- fusion ofeffectandcauseitwasbelieved thattheymust have brought the water.As
water-worn stones are regarded bj'other peoplesas eliicaciousinpi'oducing water, soitmay
have beenthatthe aboriginal Porto Ricansin theirprimitivereasoningsoughtoutandprized these spherical stones for use in rain ceremonials for crops. Thereisno stivtenient to this eft'ect in early writings, and the theory here sug- gested issimplyinferredfrom
practicescommon among
otherjjrimi- ti\e,peoples.The
specimens designated c,/",y, on plate xxxi, are spherical or ovate stonescollected at different pointson the island.Many more
wereseenl)utthev areallsimilartothoseherefigured.1-EWKEs]
ARCHEOLOGICAL
OBJECTS 111 TlIREK-PoiNTEU StONESThe
objectsinrludcd in thi.sgrouparecharacterized bythreepro- jectionsor points.The
formofthese projectionssuggestedmamnne
toProfessorMason, andled
him
todesignatethem
in hiscatalogue of the Latimercollectionmammiform
stones. Butthisappellationdoes notapply,as will be seen later,tocertain types of theseobjects,and sinceall types possess three projections thename
three-pointedisamore
appropriate terin by which to designate them. These three projectionsmay
becalled theanterior,the posterior,and the conoid.The
firsttwo
are situatedattheends of theslightlyconcaveflatside, whichmay
becalledthebase.If
we
supposethe objectsetonthis sidetheconoid projection issit- uateddirectlyopposite thebase. Itwillbefoundthatitsapex,except inrare cases, tips slightlytoward the anterior point.The
anterior projectioninmostinstancesismodifiedintoa head,butinatypefrom
which this head is absent the conoid projection still tipssomewhat
toward onepoint,which, onthat account,may
])e called theanterior projection.The
geographicaldistril)utionofthree-pointed stones isconfinedto asingleregion of the \VestIndies, nanielj',Porto Picoandtheadjacent easternendof SantoDomingo. They
have notbeen reportedfrom
Cuba, Jamaica,theBahamas,or theLesserAntilles,and no specimen hasbeenfoundinNorth,Central,orSouth America.Three-pointedstonesfallnaturallyintofourclasses: (1)Thosewith aheadontheanteriorandlegsonthe posterior points; (2)thosewith a faceon onesideof theconoid projection; (3)thosewiththeconoid pro- jection modified intoa head orface; (4)smooth spei'imens,destitute ofhead,face, legs,orincised superficialornamentation.
TYPE WITH HEAD ON
ANTERIOKAND
LEGSON
POSTERIOR PROJECTIONThe
majority of theseidols belongtothistype,whichiswellmarked
and readily distinguished from the one next following. It is not alwayspossibleto recognize the formof the legs,for the posterior projectionoften resembles a second head, butnospecimenhas yetbeen found whichis clearl}' bicephalic.The
axis of thebaseissometimes warped,now
toonesideandnow
to the other,suggesting rightsandlefts,butasa ruleisstraight.