Suborder Dalmanelloidea Moore
1952Family RHIPIDOMELLIDAE
Schuchert 1913Genus
RHIPIDOMELLA
Oehlert, 1890RHIPIDOMELLA
cf. R.MISSOURIENSIS
(Swallow), i860 Plate 3,A, figures 1-3i860. Orthis missoimensis Swallow, Trans. St. Louis Acad. Sci., vol. i, pp.
639-640.
1914. Rhipidomella missouriensis Weller, Geol. Surv. Illinois, Monogr. i, pp.
148-149, pi. 20, figs. 1-8.
Weller's subdivision of the Mississippian Rhipidomella is based chiefly
on
internal features,buttosome
extenton
theexteriors.Three
of the species he recognized, R. missouriensis (Swallow),R. oweni
Halland
Clarke,and
R. hurlingtonerisis (Hall), resemble each other verycloselyexternallyand
requireconfirmationof interior details for accurate specific designation.The Represo
collection contains only a single complete specimenand
fragments oftwo
others,none
ofwhich
reveals internal characteristics.On
the basis of sizeand
shape the species appearsclosest to R. missouriensis.Figured
specimen.— U.S.N.M.
127910.Genus
PERDITOCARDINIA
Schuchert and Cooper, 1931PERDITOCARDINIA
cf. P.DUBIA
(Hall), 1857 Plate 3,B, figures 4-71857b.OrthisdubiaHall, Trans.Albany Inst., vol. 4, p. 12.
1914. Rhipidomelladubia Weller, Geol. Surv. Illinois, Monogr. i, pp. 160-161, pi. 83, figs. 9-10.
NO. 3 MISSISSIPPIAN
FAUNA, SONORA — EASTON
ET AL.43
1932. Rhipidomella (Perditocardinia) dtibia, Schuchert and Cooper,
Mem.
Peabody Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 4, pt. i, p. 135, pi. 19, figs. 12, 16-17, 20-22.
Examples
of shellsclosely resembling Hall's species are present in this collectionand come from
theVenada
limestone in the small hilli^ miles west of Bisani.
The
beds containing P. dubia areyounger
than theChouteau
because Hall's species rangesfrom
theWarsaw
to the Ste. Genevievehorizons, so far asispresentlyknown, and
bothof these overlie theChouteau
equivalents in the Mississippi Valley sections.Figured
specimens.— U.S.N.M.
127911a, b.Family SCHIZOPHORHDAE
Schuchertand LeVene,
1929 GenusSCHIZOPHORIA
King, 1850SCHIZOPHORIA SULCATA
Sanders,new
species Plate 3,C, figures 8-22Exterior.
—
Shell transverse, alittlewider thanlong, widest atmid-
length; marginsrounded
;hinge line straight;cardinalmargins obtuse torounded
; lateral profile biconvex, with dorsal valvehaving greater convexity; anteriorcommissure
rectimarginate; frontmargin
slightly emarginate; sulcus fainton
both valves,more
prominenton
dorsalvalve. Ventralinterarea gently apsacline,gentlycurved; beak faintly curved;
umbone
small, pointed; dorsal interarea orthocline, gently curved; beak curved,umbone
pointed. Surface multicostellate,some
costellae hollow with holes leadingto exterior. Shell finely punctate.
Ventralinterior.
—
Delthyrial cavity deep; teeth stout, clublike, with posterior surface parallel to interareaand
with small accessory sock- ets; crural fossettesoblique;dental plates locateddirectlyunder
teeth, butforming
walls of delthyrial cavityand
edge of delthyrium, con- tinuedforward
as ridgesbounding
muscle field; muscle fieldbilobate, dividedby narrow
ridgewhose
basewidensanteriorly toform
raised, invertedV-shaped prominence
; adductors small, borneon median
ridge; diductor scars elongate, divergent, each pair separatedby
a faintlow
ridge.A
large trunk of the pallialsinuses originates attheforward
edgeof the diductor impression.Dorsal interior.
—
Notothyrial cavity wide, deep,bounded
by di- vergent, slightly curved brachiophore supporting plates,which
are continued anterolaterally as faint ridgesbounding
muscle field; bra- chiophores stout, slightly recurved over dental sockets, not separablefrom
supporting plates; fulcralplates curved, attached to inner over-hanging
edge of palintrope; very faint denticlealong freeinner edge44 SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS
VOL. II9 of palintrope, just lateral of sockets. Cardinal process prominent;shaft a
narrow
septumlike ridge;myophore
bilobate, with musclemarkings on
posterolateral sides; accessory cardinal processes pres- enton
floor of notothyrial cavitybetween
shaftand
brachiophore supporting plates.Muscle
area large, dividedby
faint,low median
ridge. Pallial sinuses prominent, four originating near
median
line,two on
each side of themedian
ridgeand two more
at anterior ex- tremitiesof ridges separating adductors.Types.
—
Holotype,U.S.N.M. 127915a
;figuredparatypes,U.S.N.M.
I279i5b-h; unfigured paratype,
U.S.N.M.
127915.Distinguishingcharacters.
— The
biconvexlateral profileofthis spe- cies is very characteristicand somewhat
unusual for Schisophoria.The
species is further distinguished externallyby
the sulcuson
each valve, especiallyby
theprominent
sulcuson
the dorsal valve,a feature thatinspireditsname.
This speciesresembles ^S. scdaliensis Weller, 1914, but that species lacks a sulcus
on
the dorsal valve. S. chouteauensis Weller, 1914, is also biconvex, but seems to have a deeper ventral valveand
lacks the dorsal sulcus. Unfortunately the interior details of Weller's species are not wellknown,
so other possible differences thatmay
exist be-tween
S. sulcataand
thetwo
species externally resembling it cannot be determined.Remarks. — An
interestingexample
of repairof a shell breakmade
during the lifetime of the animal isshown
near the anteriormargin
of thespecimen figuredon
plate 3C, figure 17(U.S.N.M.
I279i5e).Suborder Strophomenoidea
Maillieux 1932Family LEPTAENIDAE
Cooper, 1956Genus
LEPTAENA
Dalman, 1828Leptaena
as here described follows the long usage expressed in Weller (1914)and
elsewhere.The
writer hasmade no
attempt to trace the original usageand
genotype todetermine if hisusage corre- spondsexactly to theoriginal.McCoy
(1844, pp. 116-117) proposed Leptagonia basedon Pro-
ducta analoga Phillips, 1836, butMcCoy's name
has not been used because P. analoga Phillips has hitherto been regarded asa Leptaena.The
interior of Phillips's species isunknown,
so far as the writer isaware, but
when known
might provide a basis for generic distinction, Leptaenella Sarychevaand
Sokolskaja, 1952, alsobasedon Producta
analoga Phillips, is asynonym
of LeptagoniaMcCoy.
Furthermore,NO, 3 MISSISSIPPIAN
FAUNA, SONORA — EASTON
ET AL.45
the
name
Leptaenella is preoccupiedby
Fredericks (1917), for agenus
basedon
Leptaena rhomhoidalisventricosa Hall, 1857a,Leptae- nella Sarychevaand
Sokolskaja is thus ahomonym
as well as asynonym and must
be discarded.LEPTAENA COOPERI
Sanders,new
species Plate 4,A, figures 1-5Most
Mississippian leptaenas are referred toL. analoga (Phillips), 1836,aLower
Carboniferous speciesfrom
England, butthe internalmorphology
of Phillips's species is still undescribed.Rather
thanas- sign the present specimens to a widely used specieswhose
interior ispoorly
known and where
interiors are unavailable forcomparison,the author erects anew
species for theseMexican
shells, basedon
their internal morphology. Thisnew
species appears to differ externally (andthefew
interior details that can be seenfrom
the illustrations)from
the shells Weller (1914) assigned to L. analoga (Phillips)and
also
from
L.convexa
Weller.Exterior.
—
Shell transverse, twice aswide
as long, widest at hingeline, flattened, planoconvex, with posterior portion of ventral valve gentlyconvex, correspondingpart of dorsal valve flat, sharply genicu- late anteriorly, the point of geniculation on the dorsal valve being sharply angular in front
and becoming more
obtusetoward
cardinal extremities. Cardinal extremities acute, pointed; frontmargin
semi-elliptical, slightly emarginate; hinge straight; ventral interarea apsa- cline, narrow, gentlyconcave;beakslightlycurved; delthyrium closed at
apex by
a broad pseudodeltidium. Dorsal interareaanacline, nearly obsolete; beak only faintly pointed. Surface of both valves multi- costellate, withmuch
finer pattern of concentric lirae superposedon
costellae; both of these modified
by
larger, irregular,rounded
con- centric corrugations.Ventral interior.
—
Notothyrial cavity broad, deep, semicircular,forming
greatsunken
pitlike area for muscle attachment,bounded
posterolaterallyby
thickened valvemargin
supporting teeth, anteri- orlyby
a curved elevated ridge,apex
with triangular flattened area;teeth blunt, elongate, clublike, crenulated, with long axis directed laterally, with