34 SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS
VOL. II9NO. 3 MISSISSIPPIAN
FAUNA, SONORA — EASTON
ET AL. 35 angle inother portions of thecoral, dependingupon
the directions inwhich
the coralchancedto grow.In the proximal portion of the holotype is a stage similar to that in the figured calyx of the paratype. Eighteen septa are present, arrangedas in theparatype. Fossulae are discernible in the cardinal, counter,
and
rightalarpositions.The apex
of theparatype (diameter about 1.5mm.)
has six septaand
atabula.Comparison.
—
Cystelasma invaginatum resembles C. septatum Greene, 1901,more
closely than it resembles otherAmerican
species, particularly intheprominence
of the metasepta (rather than having majors otherthan protosepta representedby
ridgeson
the interior of the calyx). C. invaginatum differsfrom
C. septatumand from
all other species of the genus, however, in having the tabulae inclined steeplyproximally, instead ofhavingthem
horizontal.Occurrence.
— Unit
3, i specimen, possibly 2 others; unit i, ispecimen;undifferentiated, 15 specimens.
1/a^ma/.—
Holotype,U.S.N.M.
127941; paratype,U.S.N.M.
127942;topotypes,
U.S.N.M.
127958, U.S.C.4065, 4270.Remarks. —
Cystelasma invaginatummay
be confused withAm-
plexus or with
amplexoid
phases of other genera, notably Caninia.Convergence
of this nature has led authors tomake Amplexus
the catchallthatit has been. C. invaginatumisreadily distinguishedfrom Amplexus by
the steeply sloping tabulaeand by
the swollen septa.C. invaginatum possesses morphologic features of a
low
order of specialization,yetrelatedto the other species of the genus. It isappar- entfrom
the geniculateform
that C. invaginatum could change its direction ofgrowth
one ormore
times.Presumably
the impelling causewould
be either an efforttoachieve better position with regard tocurrentand
food while standing erecton
the sea floor, or to right itself after havingbecome recumbent
throughsome
accident.There
is
no
indicationon
theapicalportions of the coralsexamined
that the specieswas
attached toany
solid foreign object; hence, itmust
beassumed
that C. invaginatumgrew from
the sea floor directly. This assumption tends to be substantiatedby
the fact that the apical por- tions ofsome
specimensshow
a cylindrical phase in early maturity, followedby
rapid flaringof the individuals; thesephenomena
can be interpreted asan
initial effort to increase the speed of elongation in orderto get abovethe ocean floor, followedby normal
flaring of the skeletonwhen
favorable conditionsofgrowth were
attained. Identical changes in shape areknown
for other rugose corals, although the36 SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS
VOL. II9 writer is notaware
of previous attempts to explain the changes. In C.invaginatumtheanimal didnotincreasein diameterafter maturity, but did continuetobuildup
itsskeleton toform
thecylindrical phase oflatematurity.Itisquitepossible that theorganism
felloverbecauseits considerable length
and
weightproved
to be toomuch
of a strain for its feeblemethod
of fixation to the substratum. In this case therecumbent
animalwould grow
inanew
directioninorder togetabove thezone ofmoving
sedimentand
into amore
favorableenvironment.The
foregoing explanation is difficult of absolute proof, but at least utilizes ecologic considerations in explaining themorphology
of one geniculate coral species. Better evidence than the foregoing has been marshaled (Easton, 1945, p. 628) forAmplexus
adnatus, inwhich
spines of attachment beara definiterelationship togeniculations.In terms of evolutionary development, C. invaginatum is
more
primitive than C. lanesvillense, C. septatum,
and
C. tahulatum (allfrom
theSalem
limestone ofMeramec
age) in one ormore
of the following features. Ridgelike metaseptainmost
Cystelasmamust
befrom an
earlierseptate condition, suchasexists inC.invaginatumand
to a lesser degree in C. septatum. Dissepiments in
many
strains of corals progressively occur higherand
higher in corallites as evolu- tion progresses, hence C. invaginatum with dissepiments in early stagesismore
primitivein thischaracter thanare specieslikeC. lanes- villensisand
C. septatum.The
thin theca with faint septal grooves sometimes present, ismore
primitivethanthe verythick,nongrooved
thecae of the higher species.These
evolutionary features indicate that C. invaginatum occurs in strata older than theSalem
limestone.Order Tabulata Family FAVOSITIDAE
Genus
PLEURODICTYXIM
Goldfuss, 1829 1829. Pleurodictyum Goldfuss, Petrefacta Germaniae, vol. i, p. 113.Micheliniaofauthors.
Remarks. —
Paleontologists are not even in approximateagreement
as to thetaxonomic
status of Pleurodictyum. Several schools of thought exist with diverse interpretations of Pleurodictyum,Miche-
linia^
and
relatedgenera orsubgenera.As
previouslyutilized (Easton, 1943, p. 136; 1944, p. 55), the writer retains Pleurodictyum for Michelinia of authors.NO. 3 MISSISSIPPIAN
FAUNA, SONORA — EASTON
ET AL. 37PLEURODICTYUM SUBRAMOSUM
Easton,new
species Plate I, figures IS, i6Description.
—
Pleurodictymn with nearlyramose
cylindrical coral- lites arisingfrom
a massive region of polygonal or subcylindrical corallites. Epitheca withnumerous
fine encircling wrinkles.Mature
calyces 7mm,
or 8mm.
indiameterand up
to 5mm.
deep.More
or less complete tabulae irregularly spaced but usually notably depressedatoneplace. Calyxwallsmay
be freeand
linedwith obscure septal traces or spines, ormay
be covered with vesiculartabulae.Where two
corallites are in contact, irregularly spaced, large, gen- erally ovalmural
pores are present.When mural
pores are roughly in line,fiveoccurin 3mm.
Coinparison.
—
Pleurodictymnsubramosum
differsfrom
P. expan- suni(White)
in changingfrom
massive toramose
habit, in having septalspines,and
inhavingfunnel-likecalycal floors. Itsgrowth
habitis sufficient to distinguish it
from
other species of Pleurodictyumknown
tothe writer.Occurrence.
—
Undifferentiated,4
specimens.Material.
—
Holotype,U.S.N.M.
127940; paratypes,U.S.N.M.
127943.
Remarks. — Under
recenttendencies inthe systematics of the tabu- late corals, thegrowth
habit of this specieswould
be of sufficient importance for the erectionof anew
genus. In view of the fact that the best specimen is incompleteproximally, the writer prefers topro- pose the species as a readily recognizable Pleurodictyum.Family SYRINGOPORIDAE
Genus
SYRINGOPORA
Goldfuss, 18261826. Syringopora Goldfuss, Petrefacta Germaniae, vol. i, p. 76.
Syringopora of authors.
Remarks. — Although
several syringoporoid genera have been pro- posed, the writer is unable to assign specimens of the materialunder
study toany
of the genera as described.Under
the circumstances,it is better tousethe oldgenus Syringoporaas generally understoodand
avoidpossible further systematic complications.The
material athand
approachesKueichowpora
but also has affinities with Tetrapora.Remarks. — Among
the detritusfrom
acidization of the limestone isalargeamount
of fragmentarycorallinematerial of doubtful affini- ties.Much
of itis probably referable to Syringopora, butsome may
be Cladochonus.
The
fragments in question arerecumbent
series of38 SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS
VOL. II9budded
tubes, with the individual corallitesbecoming
erect.Other examples show
a roughly syringoporoid alignment of corallites with irregularly placed connecting processes.Some
corallites are hollowand
others contain tabular structures, but thehollow onesmay
be the result of differential silicificationwhich
did not allow preservation of thetabulae. Inany
case,examples
occur frequentlywhich show
traces of septal spines. It is probable that these fragments represent the ontogenetic changefrom recumbent
to erect habit ofgrowth
in Syringopora.SYRINGOPORA TUBIFERA
Easton,new
species Plate 2, figure 10; text figure 3Description.
—
Corallites subparallel, 1.5mm.
indiameter,and
about4
corallites occurring in 10mm.
Connecting processes prominent, in four rows.The
processes in one plane aremore
consistently present than are those in the other plane; theformer
are 3mm.
to4 mm.
apart
and
are slightlyarched; thelattermay
belocally asabundant
as theformer and may
be located at the level of the former. Epitheca thin with faint encircling striae. Insome
instancesopen
ends of corallites are lined internally withrows
of very faint septal spines, there being about 30-34in each corallite.Intransverse section the corallites are circular ornearly so. Small septal spines line the epitheca.
Tabulae
appear as concentric rings or ovals, varyinginnumber from
2 to 4.In longitudinal section the tabulae are sharply curved proximally
and
fuseat theirinnerendstoform
a slenderopen
tube locatedaxiallyand
occupying about one- fourthto one-fifth of the diameter.Tabulae
are about 0.5mm.
apart attheirproximal ends.Occurrence.
— Unit
i, 2 specimens; unit 2, i specimen; undifferen- tiated,3 specimens.Material.
—
Holotype,U.S.N.M.
127954; paratypes,U.S.N.M.
127955a, b; topotypes, U.S.C. 4073, 2 specimens; U.S.C. 4074, i specimen; fragmental topotypes,
U.S.N.M.
127955.Comparison,
—
Thisspeciesdiffersfrom
Syringopora harveyiWhite
in having
mural
processes in four rows,much
shorter septa (really septal spines), fewerand
longer tabulae,and
a nontabulate central tube.SYRINGOPORA, new
speciesA
Externals.
—
This species is principally characterizedby
its slenderand
closely packed corallites.The
corallites are about i.omm.
in di-NO. 3 MISSISSIPPIAN
FAUNA, SONORA — EASTON
ET AL.39
ameterand
about six subparallelrows
occur in lomm.
Details of connecting processesand
of external structurewere
not observed.Occurrence.
— Unit
3,4 specimens;unit i, i specimen.Material.
—
U.S.C. 4075, 4 specimens; 4076, i specimen.SYRINGOPORA, new
speciesB
Externals.
— A
verycloselyconstructedSyringopora observed inthe fieldwas
not collectable. Its corallitesareabout 4mm.
indiameter.Occurrence.
— Unit
i, fragmentaryspecimen.Fig. 3.