C. lezvisensis Weller, 1914, closely resembles C. ohesa, but the latter
seems
thickerand
hasamore rounded
outline.A
largesuite of speci-mens
forcomparisonmight show
C. ohesatomerge
intoC. lezvisensis, butthetwo
appeardistincton
thebasisof the available specimens.Genus
"CLEIOTHYRIDINA"
Buckman, 1906The
writer's unpublished studies of the Britishand
BelgianLower
Carboniferous brachiopods indicate that thetaxonomic
status of thegenus
Cleiothyridina is in doubt.Pending
publication of a clarifica- tion,thename
is used here withinquotationmarks.Two
speciesof this genus occurin this collection."CLEIOTHYRIDINA" GLENPARKENSIS
Weller, 1914 Plate 6,A, figures i-ii1914. Cleiothyridina glenparkensis Weller, Geol. Surv. Illinois, Monogr. i, pp. 473-474, pl- 78, figs. 21-24.
Ventralinterior.
— Hinge
teethstout; dentalplatesforming
wallsofrostral cavity, extending a short distance
forward
of posterolateral wall of the valve; muscle area faintly impressed, extending to about midlengthof valve,bounded
laterallyby
very faint ridges.Dorsalinterior.
—
Dental sockets with outermargin formed by
pos- terior edge of valve; inner socket plateand
fulcral plate continuous, with fulcral plate meeting posterolateral valve wall perpendicularly, curving abruptlyupward
into inner socket plate; inner socket plate curvingupward and
posterolaterally,forming
half of cardinal "proc- ess"; cardinal "process" containing fine parallel muscle striations;
hinge plate solid, projecting
toward
oppositevalve ata high angle to planeofcommissure, with smallvisceralforamen between
hinge plateand
posterior wall of valveand between two
halvesof cardinal "proc- ess"; crural bases attaching to lateral edges ofhinge plate, projecting into shellin aplaneparallel with hinge plate; muscle area not visible.A
faint,low,rounded median
ridgeoccurs inthe posterior partof the valve.Types.^
—
Figured hypotypes,U.S.N.M.
I2yg28a.-d.Discussion.
— The
dorsal cardinalia of the different genera of the athyrids arepoorlyknown. What
isknown
of these structuresby
the writer indicates thattheyare similarinmany
genera.The jugum,
pos- siblya diagnosticstructure,isknown
inonly afew
species withinthis largegroup
of brachiopods,and
is notknown
in "C."glenparkensis.Mexican
shells assigned here are a little thicker than the specimenNO. 3 MISSISSIPPIAN
FAUNA, SONORA — EASTON
ET AL. 63 illustratedby
Weller (1914. pi. 78, fig. 23), but otherwise agree in external configuration.The
importantexternal featuresemphasizedby
Weller in definingthis species are the equal convexity of the valves, therounded
to transversely elliptical outline,and
the slightmedian
flatteningor faint sulcus present
on
both valves. Weller did not de- scribe the interior details,which
are hereadded from
broken speci-mens which
preservethehinge structures."CLEIOTHYRIDINA"
species Plate6,B, figures 12-15Two
broken specimens of amuch
larger species than "C." glen- parkensis are present in this collection.These
are nearly as large as the specimens of "C." incrassata (Hall) figuredby
Weller (1914,pi. 79, fig. 12), but are so incomplete that the writer cannot assign
them
toany
species.Figured
specimens.— U.S.N.M.
127929a,b.Family CYRTINIDAE
Stehli, 1954 GenusCYRTINA
Davidson, 1858CYRTINA BURLINGTONENSIS
Rowley, 1893 Plate 7,C, figures 9-241893. Cyrtina bitrlingtonensisRowley, Amer. Geol., vol. 12, p. 308, pi. 14, figs.
15-17.
1914. Cyrtina burling tonensisWeller, Geol. Surv. Illinois, Monogr. i,pp. 288- 289, pi. 35, figs. 22-31.
Three
specimens of this species occur in the collection,two com-
plete shells
and
one fragment of a ventral valve. Allshow
clearly the diagnosticspondylium
withmedian septum
continued through the united dental lamellae, possibly like the structure Fredericks (1926) called a tichorhinum, but this could not be verified without thinsections.The two
complete specimens preservethe deltidiumand
revealalarge oval pedicleforamen
(pi. 7,C, figs. 10, 21, 22). Weller (1914,p. 288) indicates a smallforamen
forthis species.The
writer has not seen Rowley's original specimensand
cannotcompare
di-rectly the size of the
foramen between
the originaland
theseMexi-
can specimens. Small importance, however,is assigned tothe obvious factthat a largeforamen
occurs inthespecimens under study here.The
outline of thetwo
complete specimens differs somewhat, but this is ascribed to difference in ageand
a slight variation in rate of growth.The
earlygrowth
stages are distinctly preservedon
both64 SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS
VOL. II9 specimensand
appeartobevery similar.The
subconical, erectventral valveshown
inplate 7,C, figure 17, resultedfrom uniform growth
of thewhole
ventral valve.By
contrast, the apsacline profileshown
in plate 7,C, figure 11, developedby more
rapidgrowth
of the anterior margin, causingthe interareato inclineprogressivelybackward
inlatergrowth
stages.A
fragment of a ventral valve (pi. 7,C, fig. 24) reveals the highmedian septum and
short spondylium, the dental lamellae curvingtoward
theseptum
close to the cardinal area. Because of the small size of thespondylium and
its closeness to the cardinal area, the ad- ductorsand
diductorsmay
nothave beenseatedwithinthespondylium, butmay have
beenattachedtothesidesof thehigh septum.No
musclemarkings
have been seen to confirm such a view, but it seems likelyby
reason of the possibility that a large pediclemay
have attached to thespondylium and
perhaps occupiedmost
of it.Fredericks (1926) proposed the
genus
Davidsonella,'' basedon
Spirifer septosa Phillips, 1836,from
the BritishLower
Carbonifer- ous, for cyrtinidshellswithspecial apical plateswhich
hecharacterized as"spondylium
sinetichorino."The
completelydifferentexternalcon- figurationand
sizeofZ).septosa places itina differentgroup from
the shells here shown.The
presence of the"spondylium
sine tichorino,"which
is emphasizedas ageneric characterof Davidsonina,may
occur inseveralgroups ofcyrtinid shellsand
requires thin sections for veri- fication.The
writer therefore declines to assign theseMexican
shells to Davidsonina because the externalmorphology
of the shells is so differentand
the interior detailsof the dorsal valvesunknown
inboth groups.Types.
—
Figured hypotypes,U.S.N.M.
i27934a-c.Family SPIRIFERINIDAE
Davidson, 1884 GenusPUNCTOSPIRIFER
North, 1920The
original diagnosis of Punctospirifcrwas
incomplete (North, 1920)and
considerable latitude of interpretation hasgrown up
in consequence of this.The genus was
diagnosedas consistingof punc- tate spiriferidswhich
contain a prominent foldand
sulcuswhich
islarger than
any
of the simplyrounded
lateral costaeand which
areornamented
over-allby
a concentric pattern of imbricate lamellae,and
bear amedian septum
inthe ventralvalve. Dorsal interior detailswere
not discussedby North, norwas
thefinesurfaceornament.'^
Homonym,
adjusted to Davidsonina by Schuchert and LeVene (1929a, p.120.).
NO. 3 MISSISSIPPIAN
FAUNA, SONORA — EASTON
ET AL.65 The
writerhad
theopportunity to studytheholotypeand
topotype specimens ofP. scahricosta North,thegenotype species, inthecollec- tions ofH. M.
GeologicalSurvey and
the BritishMuseum
(Natural History) inLondon
during thewinter of 1953-54,and
has elsewhere discussed the resultsof these observations (Sanders, in preparation).The Mexican
collection contains excellent material for illustratingsome
of the features not describedby
North.With
the additional observations, the following revisedand
extendeddiagnosis of Puncto- spirifer is possible:
Punctate spiriferids with fold
and
sulcus wider thanany
of simple costae;bothvalvesornamented by
regular patternof concentric imbri- cating lamellae,each lamellabearingfine, hairlikespineswhich
lie flat intheplane of thelamella. Ventralinterior withmedian septum
end- ing posteriorly inan
apical callosity. Dorsal interior with pillarlike thickening supporting cardinal process, the pillar dividing anteriorly into stoutrounded
ridgeswhich bound
the muscle field laterally;
musclefield bisected
by low rounded median
ridge. Crural bases pro- jecting anteriorlyfrom
posteriorpillar, attachedtoinner socketplatesby
crural connecting plates.Primary
lamellae joined byU-shaped jugum.
Distinguishing characters.
— The
important features of Punctospi- rifer are the width of therounded
foldand
sulcuscompared
to the lateral costae, concentric imbricating lamellae bearinghairlike spines,median septum and
apical callosity inventral valve,and
thenature of the dorsal cardinalia.The
elements of the dorsal interior are simpleand
superficially similar inmost
spiriferinids. Careful study reveals differentpatternsofarrangement,however,and
Punctospirifer can be recognized readilyon
these features alone aftersome
experience.PUNCTOSPIRIFER SULCIFER,
Sanders,new
species Plate 7,D, figures 25-30Diagnosis.
—
Punctospirifers about twice aswide
as long, widestat hinge line, with acute cardinal extremities; costaeon
both valves slightly flattenedon
top; bearingfoldon
ventral valvewhich
contains amedian
sulcus.Exterior.