CHILDREN WITH SPECIAL NEEDS IN GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE
4. Conclusions
systematic, sustained and thorough in order to control, quality assurance and determination (value or meaning) of various components of learning based on the considerations and criteria as a form of accountability of teachers in implementing the learning. Of the various explanations that the evaluation has the following objectives: (a) To determine levels of learners understanding of the subject matter, (b) To train the courage and invites students to recall the material presented, (c) To determine the level of behavior change, ( d) To know who among learners intelligent and weak, so weak that he was given special attention in the pursuit of its shortcomings. Therefore, the target of evaluation is not only the students but includes teachers (teacher).
Evaluation is a continuous process of gathering and interpretation of information to assess the decisions made in designing a learning system.
The definition has three imlikasi formulation. The following implications: (a) Evaluation is an ongoing process, before, during and after the learning process. (b) The evaluation process is always directed to a specific purpose, namely to get answers about how to improve teaching. (c) The evaluation requires the use of measuring tools are accurate and meaningful to collect the information needed to make decisions, (A. M Sardiman, 2008).
Evaluation is a continuous process of information gathering and interpretation to assess decision-keputisan made in designing a learning system. The definition has three imlikasi formulation. Evaluation refers to the process associated with the collection of information which enable us to determine: (1) the rate of progress of teaching. (2) Achievement of learning objectives.
(3) How to do well in times to come.
Evaluation of learning have the various objectives which are to: (1) determine the rate of progress or result of learning on the students.
Functioning as: (a) Report to the parents / guardians of students. (b) Determination of the increase in class (c) Determination of graduation. (2) The placement of students into the teaching and learning situation is appropriate and compatible with the level of ability, interests and various characteristics possessed. (3) Know the background of students (psychological, physical and environmental) are useful for both the placement and the determination of the causes of learning difficulties of the students, which serves as input for the task of guidance and counseling. (4) As a feedback for teachers, which in turn can be used to improve the teaching and learning process and remdial program for students, (Wina Sanjaya, 2005).
Evaluation has the following functions as said by A. M, Sardiman, (2008): (a) curricular (gauge achievement of the objectives of subjects), (b) instructional (gauges achievement of the objectives of teaching and learning process), (c) diagnostic
(know the weaknesses of students, cure or completion of students' learning difficulties), (d) placement (the placement of students according to their talents and interests, and abilities) and administrative guidance counseling (collection of various problems faced by the students and alternative guidance and counseling).
According to the author of this concept is very appropriate to be implemented on children with special needs at the moment, but even better if there is one more component that should be included is the smart. During this time any learning process is followed by the development of highly sophisticated information technology.
Developments in information technology should be used for learning technology for the development of the learning process. Human development and tipology children with special needs, should also be followed by the development of information technology in the learning process.
meaning that quickly obsolete not only because of changes in the demands of everyday life. (e) Content the curriculum should contain a clear lesson, theories, principles, concepts contained in it not merely factual information. (f) Content the curriculum should be able to support the achievement of educational goals. Curriculum content are arranged in the form of educational programs will be elaborated and implemented through a process of teaching / learning experience of the students.
5. Learning strategy is the general patterns of activities of teachers and students in creating learning activities to achieve certain basic competencies.
6. Evaluation of learning is a process or activity that is systematic, sustained and thorough in order to control, quality assurance and determination (value or meaning) of various components of learning based on the considerations and criteria as a form of accountability of teachers in implementing the learning.
REFERENCE
[1] Abin Syamsuddin Makmun. 2003. Psikologi Pendidikan. PT Rosda Karya Remaja, Bandung.
[2] Ali, Muhammad. (1985). Pengembangan Kurikulum di Sekolah. Bandung: CV. Sinar Baru.
[3] Amri, Sofan. (2013). Pengembangan & Model Pembelajaran dalam Kurikulum 2013.
[4] M, Sardiman. (2008). Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
[5] Arikunto, S. (2003). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan.Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
[6] Sekretaris Negara Republik Indonesia. 2003.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sitem Pendidikan Nasional, lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2003, Nomor 78, Jakarta.
[7] Budd Richard, Atal. (1967). Content Analysis of Communication. New York: The Mac Millan Company.
[8] Bungin, Burhan. (2003). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Cet. 2. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
[9] Budd Richard, Atal. (1967). Content Analysis of Communication. New York: The Mac Millan Company.
[10] Budd, R. W., R. K. Thorp, dan L. Donohew.
(1967). Content Analysis of Communications.
New York: Macmillan.
[11] Depdiknas. (2006). Permendiknas Nomor 22 Tahun 2006 Tentang Standar Isi Sekolah Dasar.Jakarta: Depdiknas.
[12] Nana Syaodih Sukmadinata. (2007). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Rosda.
[13] Oemer Hamalik. (2009). Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
[14] Subakto, Henry. (1995). Metode Content Analysis, dalam Basis Susilo dan YanYan Cahyana, eds., Metode Penelitian Sosial Airlangga Surabaya: University Press.
[15] Husein Umar. (2002). Metode Riset Komunikasi Organisasi: Sebuah Pendekatan Kuantitatif Dilengkapi dengan Contoh Proposal dan Hasil Riset Komunikasi Organisasi, Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.
[16] Saifuddin Azwar. (2007). Tes Prestasi Fungsi
dan Pengembangan Pengukuran
Prestasi Belajar . Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.
[17] Sardiman. (2009). Intraksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rajawali.
[18] Wimer, Roger, D & Dominic, Josep, R. 2000.
Mass Media Research. Six Edition, New York:
Wadsworth Publishing Company.
[19] Anwar Jasin, (1987). Pembaharuan Kurikulum
Sekolah Dasar Sejak
Proklamasi Kemerdekaan. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
[20] Doll, Ronald C. (1974). Curriculum Improvement, Decision Making and Process.
Boston: Allyn & Bacon, Inc.
[21] Sanjaya, Wina, (2005). Pembelajaran Dalam Implementasi Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi, Jakarta, Kencana Prenada Group.
[22] Hamalik, Oemar, (2009). Pendidikan guru berdasarkan pendekatan kompetensi, Jakarta, PT.Bumi Aksara.
[23] Hosyom, John. (1985). Inquiring Into the Teaching Process. Toronto, Ontario: Oise Press.
[24] Jackson, Philip W. (Ed). (1992). Handbook of Research on Curriculum. New York:
Macmillan Publishing Co.
[25] Kibler, Robert J, et al. (1970). Behavioral Objectives and Instruction, Allyn & Bacon.
[26] Kourilsky, Marilyn & Quaranta, Lory. (1987).
Effective Teaching. London: Scott, Foresman and Co.
[27] Loucks, S. , & Lieberman, A. (1983).
Curriculum implementation. In F. W. English (Ed.), Fundamental curriculum decisions.
Alexandria, VA: ...
[28] Syaiful Bahri Djamarah. (1994). Prestasi Belajar dan Kompetensi guru. Surabaya:
Usaha Nasional Surabaya.
[29] Hamalik, Oemar. (2005). Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
[30] Hamalik, Oemar. (2010). Pendidikan Guru Berdasarkan Pendekatan Kompetensi. Jakarta:
PT. Bumi Aksara
[31] Sudjana, Nana. (2009). Dasar-Dasar Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung : Sinar Baru Algensindo.
[32] Sudjana, N., &Ibrahim. (2009). Penelitian dan Penilaian Pendidikan. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algesindo.
[33] Sudjana, N.(1989). Dasar-Dasar Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algesindo.
[34] Sarason, I.G., Levine, H.M., Basham, R.B &
Sarason, B.R. (1983). Assesing Social Support : The Social Support Questionaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
[35] Subakto, Henry. (1995). Metode Content Analysis, dalam Basis Susilo dan YanYan Cahyana, eds., Metode Penelitian Sosial Airlangga Surabaya: University Press.
[36] Klaus Krispendoff. (1993). Analisis Isi Pengantar Dan Teori Metodologi, Rajawali Press, Jakarta.