UNIVERSAL DEFORMATIONS OF NEMATIC ELASTOMERS
Family 2: Straightening, stretching, and shearing of a sector of a tube
3.6 Cylindrical balloon
to 2 to 3 throughout the deformation. At a stretch of ๐๐ = 1, the balloon is again in Case 1, corresponding to being entirely in the ๐ฟ region because no deformation has occurred. Immediately upon inflation of the balloon, the balloon jumps to Case 2, where the inner part of the balloon experiences region ๐, developing fine-scale microstructure. Then shortly after, the balloon will become entirely in region ๐, and the rest of the balloon will develop fine-scale microstructure in response to the pressure. This formation of microstructure by the liquid crystal molecules creates a softer response than the rubber without liquid crystals.
look for a solution of the form
๏ฃฑ๏ฃด
๏ฃด๏ฃด
๏ฃด๏ฃด
๏ฃฒ
๏ฃด๏ฃด
๏ฃด๏ฃด
๏ฃด
๏ฃณ
๐ =๐(๐ ) ๐ = ฮ ๐ง =๐ ๐
. (3.114)
Following the convention found in the paper by Rudykh et al. on electroactive balloons [63], let๐= ๐/๐ be the hoop stretch ratio. Let๐ denote the axial stretch ratio. Thus the associated deformation gradient is:
F=
ยฉ
ยญ
ยญ
ยญ
ยซ
1
๐๐ 0 0
0 ๐
0 0 ๐
ยช
ยฎ
ยฎ
ยฎ
ยฌ
, (3.115)
where
๐= s
1 ๐
+ ๐ 2
๐
๐ 2
๐2
๐โ 1 ๐
. (3.116)
For fixed axial ratio ๐ = 1, the principal stretches ๐1 โฅ ๐2 โฅ ๐3 are ๐1 = ๐, corresponding to หe๐,๐2=1, corresponding to หe๐ง, and๐3= 1
๐, corresponding to หe๐. Simplifying the regions, we find:
๐ฟ : ๐ โฅ ๐ 2 (3.117)
๐ : ๐ 1 โค ๐ โค ๐ 2 (3.118)
๐: ๐ โค ๐ 1, (3.119)
where๐ 1 = q
๐ 2๐(๐2๐โ1)
๐โ1 and๐ 2= q
๐ ๐2(๐2๐โ1) ๐1/3โ1 . This leads to the possibility of the following cases:
โข Case 0: ๐ > 1 and๐ 1โค ๐ 2 โค ๐ ๐: the entire balloon is in region๐ฟ
โข Case 1: ๐ > 1 and๐ 1 โค ๐ ๐ < ๐ 2 < ๐ ๐: the inner portion of the balloon is in region๐ and the outer portion is in๐ฟ
โข Case 2: ๐ > 1 and๐ 1โค ๐ ๐ < ๐ ๐ โค ๐ 2: the entire balloon is in region๐
โข Case 3: ๐ > 1 and๐ ๐ < ๐ 1 < ๐ ๐ โค ๐ 2: the inner portion of the balloon is in region๐and the outer portion is in๐
โข Case 4: ๐ > 1 and๐ ๐ < ๐ 1 < ๐ 2 < ๐ ๐: the balloon is in regions๐, then ๐, then๐ฟfrom inside to outside
โข Case 5: ๐ โฅ 1 and ๐ ๐ โค ๐ 1 โค ๐ 2: the entire balloon is in region๐
Figure 3.7: Diagram of all possible cases in the inflation of a nematic elastomer cylindrical balloon.
A diagram illustrating the various cases can be seen in Figure 3.7.
As in the spherical balloon deformation, we can gain insight from Figure 3.1 re- garding the regions that this deformation will experience. The cylindrical balloon expansion with fixed axial ration๐ =1 is the same as a planar extension deformation (the deformation gradient of Equation 3.115 isF =diag(1/๐, ๐,1)). Recalling that ๐ is the largest singular value ofF and๐ก is the largest singular value of cofF, this means that๐ก = ๐ for this deformation. If we were to follow along the๐ก = ๐ line in Figure 3.1, we see that the deformation will move progressively through region ๐ฟ then๐ then๐.
Stress
The stress in region๐ฟis
ฯ๐ฟ =โ๐๐ฟI. (3.120)
The non-zero components of stress in region ๐ are ๐๐
๐ ๐ =โ๐๐+
๐
ร
๐=1
๐๐๐๐|๐ด๐|๐๐โ12๐1/3 ๐2
+
๐
ร
๐=1
๐๐๐๐|๐ต๐|๐๐โ12๐1/6 ๐
๐๐
๐ ๐ =โ๐๐+
๐
ร
๐=1
๐๐๐๐|๐ด๐|๐๐โ1 2๐ ๐1/6
+
๐
ร
๐=1
๐๐๐๐|๐ต๐|๐๐โ12๐โ1/3๐2 ๐๐
๐ง ๐ง =๐๐
๐ ๐,
(3.121)
where
๐ด๐ = ๐1/3 ๐2
+ 2๐ ๐1/6
โ3 ๐ต๐ =๐โ1/3๐2+ 2๐1/3
๐
โ3.
(3.122)
The non-zero components of stress in region๐are ๐๐
๐ ๐ =โ๐๐+
๐
ร
๐=1
๐๐๐๐|๐ด๐|๐๐โ12๐1/3 ๐2
+
๐
ร
๐=1
๐๐๐๐|๐ต๐|๐๐โ1 2 ๐2
(๐โ1/3๐2+๐2/3)
๐๐
๐ ๐ =โ๐๐+
๐
ร
๐=1
๐๐๐๐|๐ด๐|๐๐โ12๐2๐โ2/3+
๐
ร
๐=1
๐๐๐๐|๐ต๐|๐๐โ1(2๐โ1/3๐2)
1+ 1 ๐2
๐๐
๐ง ๐ง =โ๐๐+
๐
ร
๐=1
๐๐๐๐|๐ด๐|๐๐โ12๐1/3+
๐
ร
๐=1
๐๐๐๐|๐ต๐|๐๐โ1
2๐โ1/3๐2+2๐2/3 ๐2
, (3.123) where
๐ด๐= ๐1/3 ๐2
+๐1/3+๐โ2/3๐2โ3 ๐ต๐=๐โ1/3๐2+๐โ1/3+๐2/3
๐2
โ3.
(3.124)
Solving static equilibrium
Static equilibrium (in the absence of body forces) is obtained when divฯ = 0. In cylindrical coordinates and for a symmetric tensorฯ,
๐ ๐๐ ๐
๐ ๐ + 1
๐
๐ ๐๐ ๐
๐ ๐
+ ๐๐ ๐โ๐๐ ๐ ๐
+ ๐ ๐๐ ๐ง
๐ ๐ง
=0,
๐ ๐๐ ๐
๐ ๐ + 1
๐
๐ ๐๐ ๐
๐ ๐
+ 2๐๐ ๐ ๐
+ ๐ ๐๐ ๐ง
๐ ๐ง
=0,
๐ ๐๐ ๐ง
๐ ๐ + 1
๐
๐ ๐๐ ๐ง
๐ ๐
+ ๐๐ ๐ง ๐
+ ๐ ๐๐ง ๐ง
๐ ๐ง
=0.
(3.125)
The boundary conditions for this problem are as follows:
๐๐ ๐|๐=๐๐ =โ๐ (3.126)
๐๐ ๐|๐=๐๐ =0. (3.127)
For every case, the๐ and ๐งequilibrium equations yield that ๐ =๐(๐). This leaves only the๐equilibrium equation to be solved. We will rewrite the stress expressions as
๐๐ ๐ =โ๐+๐ห๐ ๐ (3.128)
๐๐ ๐ =โ๐+๐ห๐ ๐. (3.129)
Case 0
In Case 0, the entire balloon is in region ๐ฟ. The two boundary conditions for this case are:
โ๐๐ฟ(๐= ๐๐) +๐ห ๐ฟ
๐ ๐(๐ = ๐๐)=โ๐ (3.130)
โ๐๐ฟ(๐ =๐๐) +๐ห๐ฟ
๐ ๐(๐ =๐๐)=0. (3.131) The๐ equilibrium equation yields
๐๐๐ฟ
๐ ๐
๐๐ + 1
๐
๐๐ฟ
๐ ๐โ๐๐ฟ
๐ ๐
=0 (3.132)
๐(โ๐๐ฟ+๐ห๐ฟ
๐ ๐) ๐๐
+ 1 ๐
ห ๐๐ฟ
๐ ๐โ๐ห๐ฟ
๐ ๐
=0 (3.133)
โซ ๐๐
๐๐
๐
โ๐๐ฟ +๐ห๐ฟ
๐ ๐
=
โซ ๐๐
๐๐
0๐๐ (3.134)
๐ =0, (3.135)
and thus, for Case 1, the inner pressure is:
๐=0. (3.136)
Case 1
In Case 1, ๐ โ [๐ ๐, ๐ 2] is in region ๐, and the ๐ โ [๐ 2, ๐ ๐] is in ๐ฟ. The two boundary conditions can be rewritten specific to the region:
โ๐๐(๐= ๐๐) +๐ห ๐
๐ ๐(๐ = ๐๐)=โ๐ (3.137)
โ๐๐ฟ(๐ =๐๐) +๐ห๐ฟ
๐ ๐(๐ =๐๐)=0, (3.138) and there is an additional boundary condition for continuity between the two regions:
โ๐๐ฟ(๐ =๐2) +๐ห๐ฟ
๐ ๐(๐ =๐2) =โ๐๐(๐ =๐2) +๐ห๐
๐ ๐(๐= ๐2). (3.139) First, we solve the equilibrium equations in region ๐ฟ. The๐equation yields:
๐๐๐ฟ
๐ ๐
๐๐ + 1
๐
๐๐ฟ
๐ ๐โ๐๐ฟ
๐ ๐
=0 (3.140)
๐(โ๐๐ฟ +๐ห๐ฟ
๐ ๐) ๐๐
=0 (3.141)
โซ ๐๐
๐2
๐
โ๐๐ฟ +๐ห๐ฟ
๐ ๐
=
โซ ๐๐
๐2
0๐๐ (3.142)
โ๐๐ฟ+๐ห๐ฟ
๐ ๐
|๐๐๐2 =0 (3.143)
๐๐(๐2) โ๐ห๐
๐ ๐(๐2) =0. (3.144)
In region M, the๐equation yields:
๐๐๐
๐ ๐
๐๐ + 1
๐
๐๐
๐ ๐โ๐๐
๐ ๐
=0 (3.145)
๐(โ๐๐ +๐ห ๐
๐ ๐) ๐๐
+ 1 ๐
ห ๐๐
๐ ๐โ๐ห๐
๐ ๐
=0 (3.146)
โซ ๐2 ๐๐
๐
โ๐๐ +๐ห๐
๐ ๐
=
โซ ๐2 ๐๐
1 ๐
ห ๐๐
๐ ๐ โ๐ห๐
๐ ๐
๐๐ (3.147)
๐ =
โซ ๐2
๐๐
1 ๐
ห ๐๐
๐ ๐ โ๐ห๐
๐ ๐
๐๐ . (3.148)
The right-hand side requires a change of integration variable from ๐ to ๐ . Noting that๐๐= ๐(1๐ )2๐๐ , we obtain an expression for the inner pressure:
๐=
โซ ๐ 2
๐ ๐
1 ๐(๐ )3๐
๐ห ๐
๐ ๐(๐=๐(๐ )๐ ) โ๐ห ๐
๐ ๐(๐ =๐(๐ )๐ )
๐๐ . (3.149) Case 2
In Case 2,๐ โ [๐ ๐, ๐ ๐]is in region๐. The boundary conditions are:
โ๐(๐๐) +๐ห๐
๐ ๐(๐๐) =โ๐ (3.150)
โ๐(๐๐) +๐ห๐
๐ ๐(๐๐) =0. (3.151)
Similar to the previous cases, the๐equilibrium equation yields the pressure:
๐ =
โซ ๐ ๐
๐ ๐
1 ๐(๐ )3๐
๐ห๐
๐ ๐(๐ =๐(๐ )๐ ) โ๐ห๐
๐ ๐(๐ =๐(๐ )๐ )
๐๐ . (3.152) Case 3
In Case 3, ๐ โ [๐ ๐, ๐ 1] is in region ๐ and ๐ โ [๐ 1, ๐ ๐] is in region ๐. The boundary conditions are as follows:
โ๐๐(๐ =๐๐) +๐ห๐
๐ ๐(๐= ๐๐) =0 (3.153)
โ๐๐(๐ = ๐๐) +๐ห๐
๐ ๐(๐ =๐๐) =โ๐, (3.154) and there is an additional boundary condition for continuity between the two regions:
โ๐๐(๐ = ๐1) +๐ห๐
๐ ๐(๐= ๐1) =โ๐๐(๐= ๐1) +๐ห๐
๐ ๐(๐ =๐1). (3.155) In region ๐, the๐equilibrium equation yields
๐๐(๐1) โ๐ห๐
๐ ๐(๐1) =int1 (3.156)
=
โซ ๐ ๐
๐ 1
1 ๐(๐ )3๐
๐ห๐
๐ ๐(๐ =๐(๐ )๐ ) โ๐ห๐
๐ ๐(๐ =๐(๐ )๐ ) ๐๐ . (3.157)
In region๐, we have
โซ ๐1
๐๐
๐
โ๐๐+๐ห๐
๐ ๐
=
โซ ๐1
๐๐
1 ๐
ห ๐๐
๐ ๐ โ๐ห๐
๐ ๐
๐๐ (3.158)
โ๐๐(๐1) +๐ห๐
๐ ๐(๐1) โ๐ห๐
๐ ๐(๐๐) +๐๐(๐๐)=
โซ ๐1 ๐๐
1 ๐
ห ๐๐
๐ ๐ โ๐ห๐
๐ ๐
๐๐ (3.159)
โint1+ ๐=int2, (3.160)
where
int2=๐ห๐
๐ ๐(๐1) =
โซ ๐ 1
๐ ๐
1 ๐(๐ )3๐
๐ห๐
๐ ๐(๐ =๐(๐ )๐ ) โ๐ห๐
๐ ๐(๐ =๐(๐ )๐ ) ๐๐ .
(3.161) This yields the result
๐ =int1+int2, (3.162)
or
๐ =
โซ ๐ ๐
๐ 1
1 ๐(๐ )3๐
๐ห๐
๐ ๐(๐=๐(๐ )๐ ) โ๐ห ๐
๐ ๐(๐ =๐(๐ )๐ ) ๐๐
+
โซ ๐ 1
๐ ๐
1 ๐(๐ )3๐
๐ห๐
๐ ๐(๐ =๐(๐ )๐ ) โ๐ห๐
๐ ๐(๐=๐(๐ )๐ ) ๐๐ .
(3.163)
Case 4
In Case 4,๐ โ [๐ ๐, ๐ 1]is in region๐,๐ โ [๐ 1, ๐ 2]is in region๐, and๐ โ [๐ 2, ๐ ๐] is in region๐ฟ. The boundary conditions are
โ๐๐ฟ(๐ =๐๐) +๐ห๐ฟ
๐ ๐(๐= ๐๐) =0 (3.164)
โ๐๐(๐ = ๐๐) +๐ห๐
๐ ๐(๐ =๐๐) =โ๐, (3.165) and there are additional boundary conditions for continuity between the regions:
โ๐๐(๐ =๐1) +๐ห ๐
๐ ๐(๐ =๐1) =โ๐๐(๐ =๐1) +๐ห๐
๐ ๐(๐ = ๐1) (3.166)
โ๐๐(๐ =๐2) +๐ห ๐
๐ ๐(๐ =๐2) =โ๐๐ฟ(๐ = ๐2) +๐ห๐ฟ
๐ ๐(๐= ๐2). (3.167) Region ๐ฟyields the result
๐๐ฟ(๐2) โ๐ห ๐ฟ
๐ ๐(๐2) =0. (3.168)
Region ๐ yields
โ๐๐(๐2) +๐ห๐
๐ ๐(๐2) โ๐ห๐
๐ ๐(๐1) +๐๐(๐1) =
โซ ๐2
๐1
1 ๐
ห ๐๐
๐ ๐ โ๐ห๐
๐ ๐
๐๐ (3.169)
โ๐๐ฟ(๐2) +๐ห๐ฟ
๐ ๐(๐2) โ๐ห๐
๐ ๐(๐1) +๐๐(๐1) =
โซ ๐2
๐1
1 ๐
ห ๐๐
๐ ๐ โ๐ห๐
๐ ๐
๐๐ (3.170) ๐๐(๐1) โ๐ห๐
๐ ๐(๐1) =
โซ ๐2
๐1
1 ๐
ห ๐๐
๐ ๐ โ๐ห๐
๐ ๐
๐๐, (3.171) so
๐๐(๐1) โ๐ห๐
๐ ๐(๐1)=int1 (3.172)
=
โซ ๐ 2
๐ 1
1 ๐(๐ )3๐
๐ห ๐
๐ ๐(๐ =๐(๐ )๐ ) โ๐ห๐
๐ ๐(๐ =๐(๐ )๐ ) ๐๐ . (3.173) Region๐yields
โ๐๐(๐1) +๐ห๐
๐ ๐(๐1) โ๐ห๐
๐ ๐(๐๐) +๐๐(๐๐) =
โซ ๐1 ๐๐
1 ๐
ห ๐๐
๐ ๐ โ๐ห ๐
๐ ๐
๐๐ (3.174)
โint1+๐ =
โซ ๐1
๐๐
1 ๐
ห ๐๐
๐ ๐ โ๐ห ๐
๐ ๐
๐๐ (3.175)
โint1+๐ =int2, (3.176)
where int2=
โซ ๐ 1 ๐ ๐
1 ๐(๐ )3๐
๐ห๐
๐ ๐(๐ =๐(๐ )๐ ) โ๐ห๐
๐ ๐(๐ =๐(๐ )๐ )
๐๐ . (3.177) Thus,
๐ =int1+int2, (3.178)
or
๐ =
โซ ๐ 2
๐ 1
1 ๐(๐ )3๐
๐ห๐
๐ ๐(๐ =๐(๐ )๐ ) โ๐ห๐
๐ ๐(๐ =๐(๐ )๐ ) ๐๐
+
โซ ๐ 1 ๐ ๐
1 ๐(๐ )3๐
๐ห๐
๐ ๐(๐ =๐(๐ )๐ ) โ๐ห๐
๐ ๐(๐=๐(๐ )๐ ) ๐๐ .
(3.179)
Case 5
In Case 5,๐ โ [๐ ๐, ๐ ๐]is in region๐. The boundary conditions are as follows:
โ๐๐(๐ =๐๐) +๐ห๐
๐ ๐(๐ =๐๐) =0 (3.180)
โ๐๐(๐ = ๐๐) +๐ห๐
๐ ๐(๐ =๐๐) =โ๐ . (3.181) The๐ equilibrium equation yields the result
๐=
โซ ๐ ๐
๐ ๐
1 ๐(๐ )3๐
๐ห๐
๐ ๐(๐ =๐(๐ )๐ ) โ๐ห๐
๐ ๐(๐ =๐(๐ )๐ )
๐๐ . (3.182)
Results
The calculations were performed inMATLABwith inner radius ๐ ๐ =1 cm and outer radius ๐ ๐ = 1.1 cm. The parameters that were used for the generalized Mooney- Rivlin model are the same as for the spherical balloon except with ๐2 = 5, which yields an effective shear modulus ๐ = 12
ร๐
๐=1๐๐๐1+ร๐ ๐=1๐๐๐๐
= 6.55ยท104 Pa.
The results for the inflation a cylindrical balloon with fixed axial stretch can be seen in Figures 3.8โ3.9b.
Figure 3.8: Comparison of this workโs generalized Mooney-Rivlin model with the trace formula model of [23] for inflation pressure of a cylindrical balloon.
Figure 3.8 compares the results from the generalized Mooney-Rivlin model with that of the BTW theory (which features a neo-Hookean energy structure). Similarly to the spherical balloon, the BTW model is unable to capture the correct effect of elasticity in the material at very high values of stretch, so the two curves deviate starting around a stretch of๐๐ โ 3. This workโs Mooney-Rivlin model captures the physics of the rubber extension at high stretch correctly.
Figure 3.9a and 3.9b shows the results for the balloon inflation at varying anisotropy parameter๐. The response of the balloon is stiffest in the isotropic state (๐ = 1), and gets correspondingly softer as ๐ increases, as expected. We also note that for ๐ = 1, the deformation of the balloon passes through (๐๐, ๐/๐) = (1,0) in its undeformed state and then the pressure begins immediately rising upon๐๐becoming greater than 1. However, for๐ > 1, the fact that the balloon moves through Case 0 for finite values of ๐๐ means that the balloon starts inflating at points that are not at (๐๐, ๐/๐) = (1,0), as mentioned in Chapter 2. This is due to the fact that there is a spontaneous deformation associated with the nematic state, because the liquid crystal molecules spontaneously orient along a preferred direction and
(a) (b)
Figure 3.9: Cylindrical balloon results: (a) Results for cylindrical balloon expansion at varying anisotropy parameter. (b) Progression of the cylindrical balloon solution through individual case numbers.
the surrounding polymer network deforms accordingly, with a stretch along that preferred direction and contraction in the transverse axes. Macroscopically, this means that the cylindrical balloon experiences finite stretch with zero stress.
Figure 3.9b shows the solutionโs progression through Cases 0 through 5 throughout the deformation. For ๐ = 1 (rubber), the balloon is in Case 0 (corresponding to region๐ฟ) at๐๐ =1 because there is no deformation, but after that point the balloon is entirely in Case 5 (region ๐), corresponding to a solid-like response without microstructure formation. For๐ > 1, the balloons begin in Case 0 (entirely in region ๐ฟ). Then the balloons will develop an inner portion that lies in region๐ (Case 1), corresponding to fine-scale microstructure formation in the inner part of the balloon, due to the boundary condition that there is internal pressure at the inner radius of the balloon. Then the balloon will then become entirely in region๐(Case 2) before the inner portion of the balloon will develop a solid-like response because it will be in region๐(Case 3). Finally, the balloon will become entirely in region๐, and the balloon will have a purely rubber response (Case 5). Note that we do not encounter the case in which ๐ฟ, ๐, and ๐ are all present within the balloon (Case 4) in these calculations.
3.7 Cavitation