• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

UNIVERSAL DEFORMATIONS OF NEMATIC ELASTOMERS

Family 2: Straightening, stretching, and shearing of a sector of a tube

3.6 Cylindrical balloon

to 2 to 3 throughout the deformation. At a stretch of ๐œ†๐‘œ = 1, the balloon is again in Case 1, corresponding to being entirely in the ๐ฟ region because no deformation has occurred. Immediately upon inflation of the balloon, the balloon jumps to Case 2, where the inner part of the balloon experiences region ๐‘€, developing fine-scale microstructure. Then shortly after, the balloon will become entirely in region ๐‘€, and the rest of the balloon will develop fine-scale microstructure in response to the pressure. This formation of microstructure by the liquid crystal molecules creates a softer response than the rubber without liquid crystals.

look for a solution of the form

๏ฃฑ๏ฃด

๏ฃด๏ฃด

๏ฃด๏ฃด

๏ฃฒ

๏ฃด๏ฃด

๏ฃด๏ฃด

๏ฃด

๏ฃณ

๐œŒ =๐œŒ(๐‘…) ๐œƒ = ฮ˜ ๐‘ง =๐œ‰ ๐‘

. (3.114)

Following the convention found in the paper by Rudykh et al. on electroactive balloons [63], let๐œ†= ๐‘Ÿ/๐‘… be the hoop stretch ratio. Let๐œ‰ denote the axial stretch ratio. Thus the associated deformation gradient is:

F=

ยฉ

ยญ

ยญ

ยญ

ยซ

1

๐œ†๐œ‰ 0 0

0 ๐œ†

0 0 ๐œ‰

ยช

ยฎ

ยฎ

ยฎ

ยฌ

, (3.115)

where

๐œ†= s

1 ๐œ‰

+ ๐‘…2

๐‘œ

๐‘…2

๐œ†2

๐‘œโˆ’ 1 ๐œ‰

. (3.116)

For fixed axial ratio ๐œ‰ = 1, the principal stretches ๐œ†1 โ‰ฅ ๐œ†2 โ‰ฅ ๐œ†3 are ๐œ†1 = ๐œ†, corresponding to ห†e๐œƒ,๐œ†2=1, corresponding to ห†e๐‘ง, and๐œ†3= 1

๐œ†, corresponding to ห†e๐œŒ. Simplifying the regions, we find:

๐ฟ : ๐‘… โ‰ฅ ๐‘…2 (3.117)

๐‘€ : ๐‘…1 โ‰ค ๐‘… โ‰ค ๐‘…2 (3.118)

๐‘†: ๐‘… โ‰ค ๐‘…1, (3.119)

where๐‘…1 = q

๐‘…2๐‘œ(๐œ†2๐‘œโˆ’1)

๐‘Ÿโˆ’1 and๐‘…2= q

๐‘…๐‘œ2(๐œ†2๐‘œโˆ’1) ๐‘Ÿ1/3โˆ’1 . This leads to the possibility of the following cases:

โ€ข Case 0: ๐‘Ÿ > 1 and๐‘…1โ‰ค ๐‘…2 โ‰ค ๐‘…๐‘–: the entire balloon is in region๐ฟ

โ€ข Case 1: ๐‘Ÿ > 1 and๐‘…1 โ‰ค ๐‘…๐‘– < ๐‘…2 < ๐‘…๐‘œ: the inner portion of the balloon is in region๐‘€ and the outer portion is in๐ฟ

โ€ข Case 2: ๐‘Ÿ > 1 and๐‘…1โ‰ค ๐‘…๐‘– < ๐‘…๐‘œ โ‰ค ๐‘…2: the entire balloon is in region๐‘€

โ€ข Case 3: ๐‘Ÿ > 1 and๐‘…๐‘– < ๐‘…1 < ๐‘…๐‘œ โ‰ค ๐‘…2: the inner portion of the balloon is in region๐‘†and the outer portion is in๐‘€

โ€ข Case 4: ๐‘Ÿ > 1 and๐‘…๐‘– < ๐‘…1 < ๐‘…2 < ๐‘…๐‘œ: the balloon is in regions๐‘†, then ๐‘€, then๐ฟfrom inside to outside

โ€ข Case 5: ๐‘Ÿ โ‰ฅ 1 and ๐‘…๐‘œ โ‰ค ๐‘…1 โ‰ค ๐‘…2: the entire balloon is in region๐‘†

Figure 3.7: Diagram of all possible cases in the inflation of a nematic elastomer cylindrical balloon.

A diagram illustrating the various cases can be seen in Figure 3.7.

As in the spherical balloon deformation, we can gain insight from Figure 3.1 re- garding the regions that this deformation will experience. The cylindrical balloon expansion with fixed axial ration๐œ‰ =1 is the same as a planar extension deformation (the deformation gradient of Equation 3.115 isF =diag(1/๐œ†, ๐œ†,1)). Recalling that ๐‘  is the largest singular value ofF and๐‘ก is the largest singular value of cofF, this means that๐‘ก = ๐‘  for this deformation. If we were to follow along the๐‘ก = ๐‘  line in Figure 3.1, we see that the deformation will move progressively through region ๐ฟ then๐‘€ then๐‘†.

Stress

The stress in region๐ฟis

ฯƒ๐ฟ =โˆ’๐œ‚๐ฟI. (3.120)

The non-zero components of stress in region ๐‘€ are ๐œŽ๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ =โˆ’๐œ‚๐‘€+

๐‘€

ร•

๐‘–=1

๐‘๐‘–๐‘๐‘–|๐ด๐‘€|๐‘๐‘–โˆ’12๐‘Ÿ1/3 ๐œ†2

+

๐‘

ร•

๐‘—=1

๐‘‘๐‘—๐‘ž๐‘—|๐ต๐‘€|๐‘ž๐‘—โˆ’12๐‘Ÿ1/6 ๐œ†

๐œŽ๐‘€

๐œƒ ๐œƒ =โˆ’๐œ‚๐‘€+

๐‘€

ร•

๐‘–=1

๐‘๐‘–๐‘๐‘–|๐ด๐‘€|๐‘๐‘–โˆ’1 2๐œ† ๐‘Ÿ1/6

+

๐‘

ร•

๐‘—=1

๐‘‘๐‘—๐‘ž๐‘—|๐ต๐‘€|๐‘ž๐‘—โˆ’12๐‘Ÿโˆ’1/3๐œ†2 ๐œŽ๐‘€

๐‘ง ๐‘ง =๐œŽ๐‘€

๐œƒ ๐œƒ,

(3.121)

where

๐ด๐‘€ = ๐‘Ÿ1/3 ๐œ†2

+ 2๐œ† ๐‘Ÿ1/6

โˆ’3 ๐ต๐‘€ =๐‘Ÿโˆ’1/3๐œ†2+ 2๐‘Ÿ1/3

๐œ†

โˆ’3.

(3.122)

The non-zero components of stress in region๐‘†are ๐œŽ๐‘†

๐œŒ ๐œŒ =โˆ’๐œ‚๐‘†+

๐‘€

ร•

๐‘–=1

๐‘๐‘–๐‘๐‘–|๐ด๐‘†|๐‘๐‘–โˆ’12๐‘Ÿ1/3 ๐œ†2

+

๐‘

ร•

๐‘—=1

๐‘‘๐‘—๐‘ž๐‘—|๐ต๐‘†|๐‘ž๐‘—โˆ’1 2 ๐œ†2

(๐‘Ÿโˆ’1/3๐œ†2+๐‘Ÿ2/3)

๐œŽ๐‘†

๐œƒ ๐œƒ =โˆ’๐œ‚๐‘†+

๐‘€

ร•

๐‘–=1

๐‘๐‘–๐‘๐‘–|๐ด๐‘†|๐‘๐‘–โˆ’12๐œ†2๐‘Ÿโˆ’2/3+

๐‘

ร•

๐‘—=1

๐‘‘๐‘—๐‘ž๐‘—|๐ต๐‘†|๐‘ž๐‘—โˆ’1(2๐‘Ÿโˆ’1/3๐œ†2)

1+ 1 ๐œ†2

๐œŽ๐‘†

๐‘ง ๐‘ง =โˆ’๐œ‚๐‘†+

๐‘€

ร•

๐‘–=1

๐‘๐‘–๐‘๐‘–|๐ด๐‘†|๐‘๐‘–โˆ’12๐‘Ÿ1/3+

๐‘

ร•

๐‘—=1

๐‘‘๐‘—๐‘ž๐‘—|๐ต๐‘†|๐‘ž๐‘—โˆ’1

2๐‘Ÿโˆ’1/3๐œ†2+2๐‘Ÿ2/3 ๐œ†2

, (3.123) where

๐ด๐‘†= ๐‘Ÿ1/3 ๐œ†2

+๐‘Ÿ1/3+๐‘Ÿโˆ’2/3๐œ†2โˆ’3 ๐ต๐‘†=๐‘Ÿโˆ’1/3๐œ†2+๐‘Ÿโˆ’1/3+๐‘Ÿ2/3

๐œ†2

โˆ’3.

(3.124)

Solving static equilibrium

Static equilibrium (in the absence of body forces) is obtained when divฯƒ = 0. In cylindrical coordinates and for a symmetric tensorฯƒ,

๐œ• ๐œŽ๐œŒ ๐œŒ

๐œ• ๐œŒ + 1

๐œŒ

๐œ• ๐œŽ๐œŒ ๐œƒ

๐œ• ๐œƒ

+ ๐œŽ๐œŒ ๐œŒโˆ’๐œŽ๐œƒ ๐œƒ ๐œŒ

+ ๐œ• ๐œŽ๐œŒ ๐‘ง

๐œ• ๐‘ง

=0,

๐œ• ๐œŽ๐œŒ ๐œƒ

๐œ• ๐œŒ + 1

๐œŒ

๐œ• ๐œŽ๐œƒ ๐œƒ

๐œ• ๐œƒ

+ 2๐œŽ๐œŒ ๐œƒ ๐œŒ

+ ๐œ• ๐œŽ๐œƒ ๐‘ง

๐œ• ๐‘ง

=0,

๐œ• ๐œŽ๐œŒ ๐‘ง

๐œ• ๐œŒ + 1

๐œŒ

๐œ• ๐œŽ๐œƒ ๐‘ง

๐œ• ๐œƒ

+ ๐œŽ๐œŒ ๐‘ง ๐œŒ

+ ๐œ• ๐œŽ๐‘ง ๐‘ง

๐œ• ๐‘ง

=0.

(3.125)

The boundary conditions for this problem are as follows:

๐œŽ๐œŒ ๐œŒ|๐œŒ=๐œŒ๐‘– =โˆ’๐‘ (3.126)

๐œŽ๐œŒ ๐œŒ|๐œŒ=๐œŒ๐‘œ =0. (3.127)

For every case, the๐œƒ and ๐‘งequilibrium equations yield that ๐œ‚ =๐œ‚(๐œŒ). This leaves only the๐œŒequilibrium equation to be solved. We will rewrite the stress expressions as

๐œŽ๐œŒ ๐œŒ =โˆ’๐œ‚+๐œŽห†๐œŒ ๐œŒ (3.128)

๐œŽ๐œƒ ๐œƒ =โˆ’๐œ‚+๐œŽห†๐œƒ ๐œƒ. (3.129)

Case 0

In Case 0, the entire balloon is in region ๐ฟ. The two boundary conditions for this case are:

โˆ’๐œ‚๐ฟ(๐œŒ= ๐œŒ๐‘–) +๐œŽห† ๐ฟ

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ = ๐œŒ๐‘–)=โˆ’๐‘ (3.130)

โˆ’๐œ‚๐ฟ(๐œŒ =๐œŒ๐‘œ) +๐œŽห†๐ฟ

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ =๐œŒ๐‘œ)=0. (3.131) The๐œŒ equilibrium equation yields

๐‘‘๐œŽ๐ฟ

๐œŒ ๐œŒ

๐‘‘๐œŒ + 1

๐œŒ

๐œŽ๐ฟ

๐œŒ ๐œŒโˆ’๐œŽ๐ฟ

๐œƒ ๐œƒ

=0 (3.132)

๐‘‘(โˆ’๐œ‚๐ฟ+๐œŽห†๐ฟ

๐œŒ ๐œŒ) ๐‘‘๐œŒ

+ 1 ๐œŒ

ห† ๐œŽ๐ฟ

๐œŒ ๐œŒโˆ’๐œŽห†๐ฟ

๐œƒ ๐œƒ

=0 (3.133)

โˆซ ๐œŒ๐‘œ

๐œŒ๐‘–

๐‘‘

โˆ’๐œ‚๐ฟ +๐œŽห†๐ฟ

๐œŒ ๐œŒ

=

โˆซ ๐œŒ๐‘œ

๐œŒ๐‘–

0๐‘‘๐œŒ (3.134)

๐‘ =0, (3.135)

and thus, for Case 1, the inner pressure is:

๐‘=0. (3.136)

Case 1

In Case 1, ๐‘… โˆˆ [๐‘…๐‘–, ๐‘…2] is in region ๐‘€, and the ๐‘… โˆˆ [๐‘…2, ๐‘…๐‘œ] is in ๐ฟ. The two boundary conditions can be rewritten specific to the region:

โˆ’๐œ‚๐‘€(๐œŒ= ๐œŒ๐‘–) +๐œŽห† ๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ = ๐œŒ๐‘–)=โˆ’๐‘ (3.137)

โˆ’๐œ‚๐ฟ(๐œŒ =๐œŒ๐‘œ) +๐œŽห†๐ฟ

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ =๐œŒ๐‘œ)=0, (3.138) and there is an additional boundary condition for continuity between the two regions:

โˆ’๐œ‚๐ฟ(๐œŒ =๐œŒ2) +๐œŽห†๐ฟ

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ =๐œŒ2) =โˆ’๐œ‚๐‘€(๐œŒ =๐œŒ2) +๐œŽห†๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ= ๐œŒ2). (3.139) First, we solve the equilibrium equations in region ๐ฟ. The๐œŒequation yields:

๐‘‘๐œŽ๐ฟ

๐œŒ ๐œŒ

๐‘‘๐œŒ + 1

๐œŒ

๐œŽ๐ฟ

๐œŒ ๐œŒโˆ’๐œŽ๐ฟ

๐œƒ ๐œƒ

=0 (3.140)

๐‘‘(โˆ’๐œ‚๐ฟ +๐œŽห†๐ฟ

๐œŒ ๐œŒ) ๐‘‘๐œŒ

=0 (3.141)

โˆซ ๐œŒ๐‘œ

๐œŒ2

๐‘‘

โˆ’๐œ‚๐ฟ +๐œŽห†๐ฟ

๐œŒ ๐œŒ

=

โˆซ ๐œŒ๐‘œ

๐œŒ2

0๐‘‘๐œŒ (3.142)

โˆ’๐œ‚๐ฟ+๐œŽห†๐ฟ

๐œŒ ๐œŒ

|๐œŒ๐œŒ๐‘œ2 =0 (3.143)

๐œ‚๐‘€(๐œŒ2) โˆ’๐œŽห†๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ2) =0. (3.144)

In region M, the๐œŒequation yields:

๐‘‘๐œŽ๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ

๐‘‘๐œŒ + 1

๐œŒ

๐œŽ๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒโˆ’๐œŽ๐‘€

๐œƒ ๐œƒ

=0 (3.145)

๐‘‘(โˆ’๐œ‚๐‘€ +๐œŽห† ๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ) ๐‘‘๐œŒ

+ 1 ๐œŒ

ห† ๐œŽ๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒโˆ’๐œŽห†๐‘€

๐œƒ ๐œƒ

=0 (3.146)

โˆซ ๐œŒ2 ๐œŒ๐‘–

๐‘‘

โˆ’๐œ‚๐‘€ +๐œŽห†๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ

=

โˆซ ๐œŒ2 ๐œŒ๐‘–

1 ๐œŒ

ห† ๐œŽ๐‘€

๐œƒ ๐œƒ โˆ’๐œŽห†๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ

๐‘‘๐œŒ (3.147)

๐‘ =

โˆซ ๐œŒ2

๐œŒ๐‘–

1 ๐œŒ

ห† ๐œŽ๐‘€

๐œƒ ๐œƒ โˆ’๐œŽห†๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ

๐‘‘๐œŒ . (3.148)

The right-hand side requires a change of integration variable from ๐œŒ to ๐‘…. Noting that๐‘‘๐œŒ= ๐œ†(1๐‘…)2๐‘‘๐‘…, we obtain an expression for the inner pressure:

๐‘=

โˆซ ๐‘…2

๐‘…๐‘–

1 ๐œ†(๐‘…)3๐‘…

๐œŽห† ๐‘€

๐œƒ ๐œƒ(๐œŒ=๐œ†(๐‘…)๐‘…) โˆ’๐œŽห† ๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ =๐œ†(๐‘…)๐‘…)

๐‘‘๐‘… . (3.149) Case 2

In Case 2,๐‘… โˆˆ [๐‘…๐‘–, ๐‘…๐‘œ]is in region๐‘€. The boundary conditions are:

โˆ’๐œ‚(๐œŒ๐‘–) +๐œŽห†๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ๐‘–) =โˆ’๐‘ (3.150)

โˆ’๐œ‚(๐œŒ๐‘œ) +๐œŽห†๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ๐‘œ) =0. (3.151)

Similar to the previous cases, the๐œŒequilibrium equation yields the pressure:

๐‘ =

โˆซ ๐‘…๐‘œ

๐‘…๐‘–

1 ๐œ†(๐‘…)3๐‘…

๐œŽห†๐‘€

๐œƒ ๐œƒ(๐œŒ =๐œ†(๐‘…)๐‘…) โˆ’๐œŽห†๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ =๐œ†(๐‘…)๐‘…)

๐‘‘๐‘… . (3.152) Case 3

In Case 3, ๐‘… โˆˆ [๐‘…๐‘–, ๐‘…1] is in region ๐‘† and ๐‘… โˆˆ [๐‘…1, ๐‘…๐‘œ] is in region ๐‘€. The boundary conditions are as follows:

โˆ’๐œ‚๐‘€(๐œŒ =๐œŒ๐‘œ) +๐œŽห†๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ= ๐œŒ๐‘œ) =0 (3.153)

โˆ’๐œ‚๐‘†(๐œŒ = ๐œŒ๐‘–) +๐œŽห†๐‘†

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ =๐œŒ๐‘–) =โˆ’๐‘, (3.154) and there is an additional boundary condition for continuity between the two regions:

โˆ’๐œ‚๐‘€(๐œŒ = ๐œŒ1) +๐œŽห†๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ= ๐œŒ1) =โˆ’๐œ‚๐‘†(๐œŒ= ๐œŒ1) +๐œŽห†๐‘†

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ =๐œŒ1). (3.155) In region ๐‘€, the๐œŒequilibrium equation yields

๐œ‚๐‘†(๐œŒ1) โˆ’๐œŽห†๐‘†

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ1) =int1 (3.156)

=

โˆซ ๐‘…๐‘œ

๐‘…1

1 ๐œ†(๐‘…)3๐‘…

๐œŽห†๐‘€

๐œƒ ๐œƒ(๐œŒ =๐œ†(๐‘…)๐‘…) โˆ’๐œŽห†๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ =๐œ†(๐‘…)๐‘…) ๐‘‘๐‘… . (3.157)

In region๐‘†, we have

โˆซ ๐œŒ1

๐œŒ๐‘–

๐‘‘

โˆ’๐œ‚๐‘†+๐œŽห†๐‘†

๐œŒ ๐œŒ

=

โˆซ ๐œŒ1

๐œŒ๐‘–

1 ๐œŒ

ห† ๐œŽ๐‘†

๐œƒ ๐œƒ โˆ’๐œŽห†๐‘†

๐œŒ ๐œŒ

๐‘‘๐œŒ (3.158)

โˆ’๐œ‚๐‘†(๐œŒ1) +๐œŽห†๐‘†

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ1) โˆ’๐œŽห†๐‘†

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ๐‘–) +๐œ‚๐‘†(๐œŒ๐‘–)=

โˆซ ๐œŒ1 ๐œŒ๐‘–

1 ๐œŒ

ห† ๐œŽ๐‘†

๐œƒ ๐œƒ โˆ’๐œŽห†๐‘†

๐œŒ ๐œŒ

๐‘‘๐œŒ (3.159)

โˆ’int1+ ๐‘=int2, (3.160)

where

int2=๐œŽห†๐‘†

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ1) =

โˆซ ๐‘…1

๐‘…๐‘–

1 ๐œ†(๐‘…)3๐‘…

๐œŽห†๐‘†

๐œƒ ๐œƒ(๐œŒ =๐œ†(๐‘…)๐‘…) โˆ’๐œŽห†๐‘†

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ =๐œ†(๐‘…)๐‘…) ๐‘‘๐‘… .

(3.161) This yields the result

๐‘ =int1+int2, (3.162)

or

๐‘ =

โˆซ ๐‘…๐‘œ

๐‘…1

1 ๐œ†(๐‘…)3๐‘…

๐œŽห†๐‘€

๐œƒ ๐œƒ(๐œŒ=๐œ†(๐‘…)๐‘…) โˆ’๐œŽห† ๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ =๐œ†(๐‘…)๐‘…) ๐‘‘๐‘…

+

โˆซ ๐‘…1

๐‘…๐‘–

1 ๐œ†(๐‘…)3๐‘…

๐œŽห†๐‘†

๐œƒ ๐œƒ(๐œŒ =๐œ†(๐‘…)๐‘…) โˆ’๐œŽห†๐‘†

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ=๐œ†(๐‘…)๐‘…) ๐‘‘๐‘… .

(3.163)

Case 4

In Case 4,๐‘… โˆˆ [๐‘…๐‘–, ๐‘…1]is in region๐‘†,๐‘… โˆˆ [๐‘…1, ๐‘…2]is in region๐‘€, and๐‘… โˆˆ [๐‘…2, ๐‘…๐‘œ] is in region๐ฟ. The boundary conditions are

โˆ’๐œ‚๐ฟ(๐œŒ =๐œŒ๐‘œ) +๐œŽห†๐ฟ

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ= ๐œŒ๐‘œ) =0 (3.164)

โˆ’๐œ‚๐‘†(๐œŒ = ๐œŒ๐‘–) +๐œŽห†๐‘†

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ =๐œŒ๐‘–) =โˆ’๐‘, (3.165) and there are additional boundary conditions for continuity between the regions:

โˆ’๐œ‚๐‘€(๐œŒ =๐œŒ1) +๐œŽห† ๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ =๐œŒ1) =โˆ’๐œ‚๐‘†(๐œŒ =๐œŒ1) +๐œŽห†๐‘†

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ = ๐œŒ1) (3.166)

โˆ’๐œ‚๐‘€(๐œŒ =๐œŒ2) +๐œŽห† ๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ =๐œŒ2) =โˆ’๐œ‚๐ฟ(๐œŒ = ๐œŒ2) +๐œŽห†๐ฟ

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ= ๐œŒ2). (3.167) Region ๐ฟyields the result

๐œ‚๐ฟ(๐œŒ2) โˆ’๐œŽห† ๐ฟ

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ2) =0. (3.168)

Region ๐‘€ yields

โˆ’๐œ‚๐‘€(๐œŒ2) +๐œŽห†๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ2) โˆ’๐œŽห†๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ1) +๐œ‚๐‘€(๐œŒ1) =

โˆซ ๐œŒ2

๐œŒ1

1 ๐œŒ

ห† ๐œŽ๐‘€

๐œƒ ๐œƒ โˆ’๐œŽห†๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ

๐‘‘๐œŒ (3.169)

โˆ’๐œ‚๐ฟ(๐œŒ2) +๐œŽห†๐ฟ

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ2) โˆ’๐œŽห†๐‘†

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ1) +๐œ‚๐‘†(๐œŒ1) =

โˆซ ๐œŒ2

๐œŒ1

1 ๐œŒ

ห† ๐œŽ๐‘€

๐œƒ ๐œƒ โˆ’๐œŽห†๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ

๐‘‘๐œŒ (3.170) ๐œ‚๐‘†(๐œŒ1) โˆ’๐œŽห†๐‘†

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ1) =

โˆซ ๐œŒ2

๐œŒ1

1 ๐œŒ

ห† ๐œŽ๐‘€

๐œƒ ๐œƒ โˆ’๐œŽห†๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ

๐‘‘๐œŒ, (3.171) so

๐œ‚๐‘†(๐œŒ1) โˆ’๐œŽห†๐‘†

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ1)=int1 (3.172)

=

โˆซ ๐‘…2

๐‘…1

1 ๐œ†(๐‘…)3๐‘…

๐œŽห† ๐‘€

๐œƒ ๐œƒ(๐œŒ =๐œ†(๐‘…)๐‘…) โˆ’๐œŽห†๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ =๐œ†(๐‘…)๐‘…) ๐‘‘๐‘… . (3.173) Region๐‘†yields

โˆ’๐œ‚๐‘†(๐œŒ1) +๐œŽห†๐‘†

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ1) โˆ’๐œŽห†๐‘†

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ๐‘–) +๐œ‚๐‘†(๐œŒ๐‘–) =

โˆซ ๐œŒ1 ๐œŒ๐‘–

1 ๐œŒ

ห† ๐œŽ๐‘€

๐œƒ ๐œƒ โˆ’๐œŽห† ๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ

๐‘‘๐œŒ (3.174)

โˆ’int1+๐‘ =

โˆซ ๐œŒ1

๐œŒ๐‘–

1 ๐œŒ

ห† ๐œŽ๐‘€

๐œƒ ๐œƒ โˆ’๐œŽห† ๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ

๐‘‘๐œŒ (3.175)

โˆ’int1+๐‘ =int2, (3.176)

where int2=

โˆซ ๐‘…1 ๐‘…๐‘–

1 ๐œ†(๐‘…)3๐‘…

๐œŽห†๐‘†

๐œƒ ๐œƒ(๐œŒ =๐œ†(๐‘…)๐‘…) โˆ’๐œŽห†๐‘†

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ =๐œ†(๐‘…)๐‘…)

๐‘‘๐‘… . (3.177) Thus,

๐‘ =int1+int2, (3.178)

or

๐‘ =

โˆซ ๐‘…2

๐‘…1

1 ๐œ†(๐‘…)3๐‘…

๐œŽห†๐‘€

๐œƒ ๐œƒ(๐œŒ =๐œ†(๐‘…)๐‘…) โˆ’๐œŽห†๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ =๐œ†(๐‘…)๐‘…) ๐‘‘๐‘…

+

โˆซ ๐‘…1 ๐‘…๐‘–

1 ๐œ†(๐‘…)3๐‘…

๐œŽห†๐‘†

๐œƒ ๐œƒ(๐œŒ =๐œ†(๐‘…)๐‘…) โˆ’๐œŽห†๐‘†

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ=๐œ†(๐‘…)๐‘…) ๐‘‘๐‘… .

(3.179)

Case 5

In Case 5,๐‘… โˆˆ [๐‘…๐‘–, ๐‘…๐‘œ]is in region๐‘†. The boundary conditions are as follows:

โˆ’๐œ‚๐‘†(๐œŒ =๐œŒ๐‘œ) +๐œŽห†๐‘†

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ =๐œŒ๐‘œ) =0 (3.180)

โˆ’๐œ‚๐‘†(๐œŒ = ๐œŒ๐‘–) +๐œŽห†๐‘†

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ =๐œŒ๐‘–) =โˆ’๐‘ . (3.181) The๐œŒ equilibrium equation yields the result

๐‘=

โˆซ ๐‘…๐‘œ

๐‘…๐‘–

1 ๐œ†(๐‘…)3๐‘…

๐œŽห†๐‘†

๐œƒ ๐œƒ(๐œŒ =๐œ†(๐‘…)๐‘…) โˆ’๐œŽห†๐‘†

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ =๐œ†(๐‘…)๐‘…)

๐‘‘๐‘… . (3.182)

Results

The calculations were performed inMATLABwith inner radius ๐‘…๐‘– =1 cm and outer radius ๐‘…๐‘œ = 1.1 cm. The parameters that were used for the generalized Mooney- Rivlin model are the same as for the spherical balloon except with ๐‘2 = 5, which yields an effective shear modulus ๐œ‡ = 12

ร๐‘

๐‘–=1๐‘๐‘–๐‘1+ร๐‘€ ๐‘—=1๐‘‘๐‘—๐‘ž๐‘—

= 6.55ยท104 Pa.

The results for the inflation a cylindrical balloon with fixed axial stretch can be seen in Figures 3.8โ€“3.9b.

Figure 3.8: Comparison of this workโ€™s generalized Mooney-Rivlin model with the trace formula model of [23] for inflation pressure of a cylindrical balloon.

Figure 3.8 compares the results from the generalized Mooney-Rivlin model with that of the BTW theory (which features a neo-Hookean energy structure). Similarly to the spherical balloon, the BTW model is unable to capture the correct effect of elasticity in the material at very high values of stretch, so the two curves deviate starting around a stretch of๐œ†๐‘œ โ‰ˆ 3. This workโ€™s Mooney-Rivlin model captures the physics of the rubber extension at high stretch correctly.

Figure 3.9a and 3.9b shows the results for the balloon inflation at varying anisotropy parameter๐‘Ÿ. The response of the balloon is stiffest in the isotropic state (๐‘Ÿ = 1), and gets correspondingly softer as ๐‘Ÿ increases, as expected. We also note that for ๐‘Ÿ = 1, the deformation of the balloon passes through (๐œ†๐‘œ, ๐‘/๐œ‡) = (1,0) in its undeformed state and then the pressure begins immediately rising upon๐œ†๐‘œbecoming greater than 1. However, for๐‘Ÿ > 1, the fact that the balloon moves through Case 0 for finite values of ๐œ†๐‘œ means that the balloon starts inflating at points that are not at (๐œ†๐‘œ, ๐‘/๐œ‡) = (1,0), as mentioned in Chapter 2. This is due to the fact that there is a spontaneous deformation associated with the nematic state, because the liquid crystal molecules spontaneously orient along a preferred direction and

(a) (b)

Figure 3.9: Cylindrical balloon results: (a) Results for cylindrical balloon expansion at varying anisotropy parameter. (b) Progression of the cylindrical balloon solution through individual case numbers.

the surrounding polymer network deforms accordingly, with a stretch along that preferred direction and contraction in the transverse axes. Macroscopically, this means that the cylindrical balloon experiences finite stretch with zero stress.

Figure 3.9b shows the solutionโ€™s progression through Cases 0 through 5 throughout the deformation. For ๐‘Ÿ = 1 (rubber), the balloon is in Case 0 (corresponding to region๐ฟ) at๐œ†๐‘œ =1 because there is no deformation, but after that point the balloon is entirely in Case 5 (region ๐‘†), corresponding to a solid-like response without microstructure formation. For๐‘Ÿ > 1, the balloons begin in Case 0 (entirely in region ๐ฟ). Then the balloons will develop an inner portion that lies in region๐‘€ (Case 1), corresponding to fine-scale microstructure formation in the inner part of the balloon, due to the boundary condition that there is internal pressure at the inner radius of the balloon. Then the balloon will then become entirely in region๐‘€(Case 2) before the inner portion of the balloon will develop a solid-like response because it will be in region๐‘†(Case 3). Finally, the balloon will become entirely in region๐‘†, and the balloon will have a purely rubber response (Case 5). Note that we do not encounter the case in which ๐ฟ, ๐‘€, and ๐‘† are all present within the balloon (Case 4) in these calculations.

3.7 Cavitation