• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

UNIVERSAL DEFORMATIONS OF NEMATIC ELASTOMERS

Family 2: Straightening, stretching, and shearing of a sector of a tube

3.5 Spherical balloon

Deformation of spherical balloon expansion

We are interested in the deformation of a balloon, which can be modeled as a spherical shell subjected to an internal pressure. In the undeformed configuration, the balloon has inner radius ๐‘…๐‘– and outer radius ๐‘…๐‘œ. The internal pressure is denoted by๐‘. The spherical balloon is assumed to remain spherical throughout the deformation. The undeformed sphere has radial coordinate๐‘… โˆˆ [๐‘…๐‘–, ๐‘…๐‘œ], azimuthal angle ฮ˜ โˆˆ [0,2๐œ‹), and polar angle ฮฆ โˆˆ [0, ๐œ‹), while the deformed sphere has coordinate system ๐œŒ โˆˆ [๐œŒ๐‘–, ๐œŒ๐‘œ], ๐œƒ โˆˆ [0,2๐œ‹), and ๐œ™ โˆˆ [0, ๐œ‹). Following Ericksen, we make the ansatz

๏ฃฑ๏ฃด

๏ฃด๏ฃด

๏ฃด๏ฃด

๏ฃฒ

๏ฃด๏ฃด

๏ฃด๏ฃด

๏ฃด

๏ฃณ

๐œŒ =๐œŒ(๐‘…) ๐œƒ = ฮ˜ ๐œ™ = ฮฆ

. (3.49)

The deformation gradient in spherical coordinates is

F =ยฉ

ยญ

ยญ

ยซ

๐‘‘๐œŒ ๐‘‘๐‘…

๐œŒ ๐‘…

๐œŒ ๐‘…

ยช

ยฎ

ยฎ

ยฎ

ยฌ

. (3.50)

With incompressibility, detF =1, we obtain this first-order differential equation ๐‘‘๐œŒ

๐‘‘๐‘… ๐œŒ2 ๐‘…2

=1. (3.51)

Solving for the deformed radius ๐œŒas a function of the undeformed radius๐‘…: ๐œŒ =

๐‘…3+๐‘

1/3

, (3.52)

where๐‘is a constant. Let๐œ†denote the azimuthal stretch,๐œ†= ๐œŒ๐‘…, and let๐œ†๐‘œdenote the azimuthal stretch at the outer radius,๐œ†๐‘œ = ๐œŒ(๐‘…๐‘…๐‘œ)

๐‘œ . Then, ๐œ†๐‘œ =

๐‘…3

๐‘œ+๐‘1/3

๐‘…๐‘œ

. (3.53)

Solving for๐‘and plugging๐‘back into Equation 3.52 yields ๐œŒ =

๐‘…3+๐‘…3

๐‘œ

๐œ†3

๐‘œโˆ’1

1/3

, (3.54)

and the azimuthal stretch is

๐œ†= 1+ ๐‘…๐‘œ

๐‘… 3

๐œ†3

๐‘œโˆ’1

!1/3

. (3.55)

Thus, the deformation gradient is

F =ยฉ

ยญ

ยญ

ยซ

1 ๐œ†2

๐œ† ๐œ†

ยช

ยฎ

ยฎ

ยฎ

ยฌ

, (3.56)

and the left Cauchy-Green tensor,b=F F> is

b=ยฉ

ยญ

ยญ

ยซ

1 ๐œ†4

๐œ†2 ๐œ†2

ยช

ยฎ

ยฎ

ยฎ

ยฌ

. (3.57)

The principal stretches are๐œ†1 =๐œ†2 = ๐œ†(corresponding toe๐œƒ ande๐œ™) and๐œ†3 = 1

๐œ†2

(corresponding toe๐œŒ). Thus, ๐‘ =๐œ†and๐‘ก =๐œ†2. The regions are:

๐ฟ : {๐‘… โ‰ฅ ๐‘…โˆ—} (3.58)

๐‘€ : {๐‘… โ‰ค ๐‘…โˆ—, ๐‘Ÿ โ‰ฅ 1} (3.59)

๐‘†: {๐‘Ÿ โ‰ค 1}, (3.60)

where

๐‘…โˆ— =๐‘…๐‘œ ๐œ†3

๐‘œโˆ’1 ๐‘Ÿ1/4โˆ’1

1/3

. (3.61)

This leads to the possibility of three cases:

โ€ข Case 1: ๐‘Ÿ > 1 and๐‘…โˆ— โ‰ค ๐‘…๐‘–: the entire balloon is in region๐ฟ

โ€ข Case 2: ๐‘Ÿ >1 and๐‘…๐‘– < ๐‘…โˆ— < ๐‘…๐‘œ: the inner region of the balloon๐‘… โˆˆ [๐‘…๐‘–, ๐‘…โˆ—] is in ๐‘€, and the outer region๐‘… โˆˆ [๐‘…โˆ—, ๐‘…๐‘œ] is in๐ฟ

Figure 3.3: Diagram of all possible cases in the inflation of a nematic elastomer spherical balloon.

โ€ข Case 3: ๐‘Ÿ > 1 and๐‘…โˆ— โ‰ฅ ๐‘…๐‘œ: the entire balloon is in region ๐‘€

โ€ข Case 4: ๐‘Ÿ =1 and the entire balloon is in region๐‘†

A diagram illustrating the various cases can be seen in Figure 3.3.

Note that Figure 3.1 can provide us with insight into the regions that this deformation will experience. The spherical balloon expansion is merely equibiaxial stretch (see the deformation gradient of Equation 3.56). Recalling that๐‘  is the largest singular value of F and๐‘ก is the largest singular value of cofF, this means that ๐‘ก = ๐‘ 2 for this deformation. Following along the ๐‘ก = ๐‘ 2 curve in Figure 3.1, we see that the deformation will move progressively through region๐ฟthen๐‘€, never touching๐‘†for ๐‘Ÿ >1.

Stress

The expressions for stress are as follows: In region๐ฟ,

ฯƒ๐ฟ =โˆ’๐œ‚๐ฟI. (3.62)

In region ๐‘€, the non-zero components of the stress are:

๐œŽ๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ=โˆ’๐œ‚๐‘€ +

๐‘€

ร•

๐‘–=1

๐‘๐‘–๐‘๐‘–|๐ด๐‘€|๐‘๐‘–โˆ’12๐‘Ÿ1/3 ๐œ†4

+

๐‘

ร•

๐‘—=1

๐‘‘๐‘—๐‘ž๐‘—|๐ต๐‘€|๐‘ž๐‘—โˆ’12๐‘Ÿ1/6 ๐œ†2

๐œŽ๐‘€

๐œƒ ๐œƒ =โˆ’๐œ‚๐‘€ +

๐‘€

ร•

๐‘–=1

๐‘๐‘–๐‘๐‘–|๐ด๐‘€|๐‘๐‘–โˆ’12๐œ†2 ๐‘Ÿ1/6

+

๐‘

ร•

๐‘—=1

๐‘‘๐‘—๐‘ž๐‘—|๐ต๐‘€|๐‘ž๐‘—โˆ’12๐‘Ÿโˆ’1/3๐œ†4 ๐œŽ๐‘€

๐œ™ ๐œ™ =๐œŽ๐‘€

๐œƒ ๐œƒ,

(3.63)

where

๐ด๐‘€ = ๐‘Ÿ1/3 ๐œ†4

+ 2๐œ†2 ๐‘Ÿ1/6

โˆ’3 ๐ต๐‘€ =๐‘Ÿโˆ’1/3๐œ†4+ 2๐‘Ÿ1/6 ๐œ†2

โˆ’3.

(3.64)

In region๐‘†,๐‘Ÿ =1 and the non-zero components of the stress are ๐œŽ๐‘†

๐œŒ ๐œŒ =โˆ’๐œ‚๐‘†+

๐‘€

ร•

๐‘–=1

๐‘๐‘–๐‘๐‘–|๐ด๐‘†|๐‘๐‘–โˆ’1 2 ๐œ†4

+

๐‘

ร•

๐‘—=1

๐‘‘๐‘—๐‘ž๐‘—|๐ต๐‘†|๐‘ž๐‘—โˆ’1 4 ๐œ†2

๐œŽ๐‘†

๐œƒ ๐œƒ =โˆ’๐œ‚๐‘†+

๐‘€

ร•

๐‘–=1

๐‘๐‘–๐‘๐‘–|๐ด๐‘†|๐‘๐‘–โˆ’1(2๐œ†2) +

๐‘

ร•

๐‘—=1

๐‘‘๐‘—๐‘ž๐‘—|๐ต๐‘†|๐‘ž๐‘—โˆ’1(2๐œ†2)

๐œ†2+ 1 ๐œ†4

๐œŽ๐‘†

๐œ™ ๐œ™ =๐œŽ๐‘†

๐œƒ ๐œƒ,

(3.65)

where

๐ด๐‘†= 1 ๐œ†4

+2๐œ†2โˆ’3 ๐ต๐‘†=๐œ†4+ 2

๐œ†2

โˆ’3.

(3.66)

Solving static equilibrium

The static equilibrium equations (in the absence of body forces) in spherical coor- dinates are

๐œŒ:

๐œ• ๐œŽ๐œŒ ๐œŒ

๐œ• ๐œŒ +2

๐œŽ๐œŒ ๐œŒ ๐œŒ

+ 1 ๐œŒ

๐œ• ๐œŽ๐œ™ ๐œŒ

๐œ• ๐œ™

+ cot๐œ™ ๐œŒ

๐œŽ๐œ™ ๐œŒ+ 1 ๐œŒsin๐œ™

๐œ• ๐œŽ๐œƒ ๐œŒ

๐œ• ๐œƒ

โˆ’ 1 ๐œŒ

๐œŽ๐œƒ ๐œƒ +๐œŽ๐œ™ ๐œ™

=0 (3.67) ๐œƒ :

๐œ• ๐œŽ๐œŒ ๐œƒ

๐œ• ๐œŒ +2

๐œŽ๐œŒ ๐œƒ ๐œŒ

+ 1 ๐œŒ

๐œ• ๐œŽ๐œ™๐œƒ

๐œ• ๐œ™

+ 1

๐œŒsin๐œ™

๐œ• ๐œŽ๐œƒ ๐œƒ

๐œ• ๐œƒ +

๐œŽ๐œƒ ๐œŒ ๐œŒ

+ cot๐œ™ ๐œŒ

๐œŽ๐œ™๐œƒ +๐œŽ๐œƒ ๐œ™

=0 (3.68) ๐œ™:

๐œ• ๐œŽ๐œŒ ๐œ™

๐œ• ๐œŒ +2

๐œŽ๐œŒ ๐œ™ ๐œŒ

+ 1 ๐œŒ

๐œ• ๐œŽ๐œ™ ๐œ™

๐œ• ๐œ™

+ 1

๐œŒsin๐œ™

๐œ• ๐œŽ๐œƒ ๐œ™

๐œ• ๐œƒ +

๐œŽ๐œ™ ๐œŒ ๐œŒ

+cot๐œ™ ๐œŒ

๐œŽ๐œ™ ๐œ™โˆ’๐œŽ๐œƒ ๐œƒ

=0, (3.69) and the boundary conditions for this problem are as follows:

๐œŽ๐œŒ ๐œŒ|๐œŒ=๐œŒ๐‘– =โˆ’๐‘ (3.70)

๐œŽ๐œŒ ๐œŒ|๐œŒ=๐œŒ๐‘œ =0. (3.71)

In all cases, solving the ๐œ™ equation yields ๐œ‚ = ๐œ‚(๐œŒ, ๐œƒ). Similarly, solving the ๐œƒ equation, we find that ๐œ‚ = ๐œ‚(๐œŒ). Finally, to solve the ๐œŒ equation, we will rewrite the stress expressions as

๐œŽ๐œŒ ๐œŒ =โˆ’๐œ‚+๐œŽห†๐œŒ ๐œŒ (3.72)

๐œŽ๐œƒ ๐œƒ =๐œŽ๐œ™ ๐œ™ =โˆ’๐œ‚+๐œŽห†๐œƒ ๐œƒ, (3.73) and so the boundary conditions can be rewritten as follows

โˆ’๐œ‚(๐œŒ =๐œŒ๐‘–) +๐œŽห†๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ= ๐œŒ๐‘–) =โˆ’๐‘ (3.74)

โˆ’๐œ‚(๐œŒ = ๐œŒ๐‘œ) +๐œŽห†๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ = ๐œŒ๐‘œ) =0. (3.75)

Case 1

In Case 1, the entire balloon is in region ๐ฟ. The two boundary conditions for this case are:

โˆ’๐œ‚๐ฟ(๐œŒ= ๐œŒ๐‘–) +๐œŽห† ๐ฟ

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ = ๐œŒ๐‘–)=โˆ’๐‘ (3.76)

โˆ’๐œ‚๐ฟ(๐œŒ =๐œŒ๐‘œ) +๐œŽห†๐ฟ

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ =๐œŒ๐‘œ)=0. (3.77) The stress in this region is found in Equation 3.62. Thus, the๐œŒequilibrium equation yields

๐‘‘๐œŽ๐ฟ

๐œŒ ๐œŒ

๐‘‘๐œŒ +2

๐œŽ๐ฟ

๐œŒ ๐œŒ

๐œŒ

โˆ’ 1 ๐œŒ

๐œŽ๐ฟ

๐œƒ ๐œƒ +๐œŽ๐ฟ

๐œ™ ๐œ™

=0 (3.78) ๐‘‘(โˆ’๐œ‚๐ฟ+๐œŽห†๐ฟ

๐œŒ ๐œŒ) ๐‘‘๐œŒ

+2

(โˆ’๐œ‚๐ฟ+๐œŽห†๐ฟ

๐œŒ ๐œŒ) ๐œŒ

โˆ’ 1 ๐œŒ

โˆ’๐œ‚๐ฟ +๐œŽห† ๐ฟ

๐œƒ ๐œƒโˆ’๐œ‚๐ฟ +๐œŽห†๐ฟ

๐œ™ ๐œ™

=0 (3.79)

โˆซ ๐œŒ๐‘œ

๐œŒ๐‘–

๐‘‘

โˆ’๐œ‚๐ฟ +๐œŽห†๐ฟ

๐œŒ ๐œŒ

=

โˆซ ๐œŒ๐‘œ

๐œŒ๐‘–

0๐‘‘๐œŒ (3.80) ๐‘=0 (3.81) Thus, for Case 1, the inner pressure is:

๐‘=0. (3.82)

Case 2

In Case 2, ๐‘… โˆˆ [๐‘…๐‘–, ๐‘…โˆ—] is in region ๐‘€, and the ๐‘… โˆˆ [๐‘…โˆ—, ๐‘…๐‘œ] is in ๐ฟ. The two boundary conditions can be rewritten specific to the region:

โˆ’๐œ‚๐‘€(๐œŒ= ๐œŒ๐‘–) +๐œŽห† ๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ = ๐œŒ๐‘–)=โˆ’๐‘ (3.83)

โˆ’๐œ‚๐ฟ(๐œŒ =๐œŒ๐‘œ) +๐œŽห†๐ฟ

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ =๐œŒ๐‘œ)=0, (3.84) and there is an additional boundary condition for continuity between the two regions:

โˆ’๐œ‚๐ฟ(๐œŒ = ๐œŒโˆ—) +๐œŽห†๐ฟ

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ= ๐œŒโˆ—)=โˆ’๐œ‚๐‘€(๐œŒ= ๐œŒโˆ—) +๐œŽห†๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ =๐œŒโˆ—). (3.85)

First, we solve the equilibrium equations in region ๐ฟ. Again, the stress in region๐ฟ is found in Equation 3.62. The๐œŒequation yields:

๐‘‘๐œŽ๐ฟ

๐œŒ ๐œŒ

๐‘‘๐œŒ +2

๐œŽ๐ฟ

๐œŒ ๐œŒ

๐œŒ

โˆ’ 1 ๐œŒ

๐œŽ๐ฟ

๐œƒ ๐œƒ +๐œŽ๐ฟ

๐œ™ ๐œ™

=0 (3.86) ๐‘‘(โˆ’๐œ‚๐ฟ+๐œŽห†๐ฟ

๐œŒ ๐œŒ) ๐‘‘๐œŒ

+2(โˆ’๐œ‚๐ฟ+๐œŽห†๐ฟ

๐œŒ ๐œŒ) ๐œŒ

โˆ’ 1 ๐œŒ

โˆ’๐œ‚๐ฟ +๐œŽห† ๐ฟ

๐œƒ ๐œƒโˆ’๐œ‚๐ฟ +๐œŽห†๐ฟ

๐œ™ ๐œ™

=0 (3.87) ๐‘‘

โˆ’๐œ‚๐ฟ +๐œŽห†๐ฟ

๐œŒ ๐œŒ

๐‘‘๐œŒ

=0 (3.88)

โˆ’๐œ‚๐ฟ+๐œŽห†๐ฟ

๐œŒ ๐œŒ

|๐œŒ๐‘œ

๐œŒโˆ— =0 (3.89)

โˆ’๐œ‚๐ฟ(๐œŒ๐‘œ) +๐œŽห† ๐ฟ

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ๐‘œ)

โˆ’

โˆ’๐œ‚๐ฟ(๐œŒโˆ—) +๐œŽห†๐ฟ

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒโˆ—)

=0 (3.90)

โˆ’๐œ‚๐ฟ(๐œŒโˆ—) +๐œŽห†๐ฟ

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒโˆ—)=0 (3.91) In region M, the stress is that of Eqns. 3.63 and 3.64. The๐œŒequation yields:

๐‘‘๐œŽ๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ

๐‘‘๐œŒ +2

๐œŽ๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ

๐œŒ

โˆ’ 1 ๐œŒ

๐œŽ๐‘€

๐œƒ ๐œƒ +๐œŽ๐‘€

๐œ™ ๐œ™

=0 (3.92) ๐‘‘(โˆ’๐œ‚๐‘€ +๐œŽห† ๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ) ๐‘‘๐œŒ

+ 1 ๐œŒ

2 ห†๐œŽ๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒโˆ’๐œŽห† ๐‘€

๐œƒ ๐œƒ โˆ’๐œŽห†๐‘€

๐œ™ ๐œ™

=0 (3.93)

โˆซ ๐œŒโˆ—

๐œŒ๐‘–

๐‘‘

โˆ’๐œ‚๐‘€+๐œŽห†๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ

=โˆ’

โˆซ ๐œŒโˆ—

๐œŒ๐‘–

2 ๐œŒ

ห† ๐œŽ๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒโˆ’๐œŽห† ๐‘€

๐œƒ ๐œƒ

๐‘‘๐œŒ (3.94)

โˆ’๐œ‚๐‘€(๐œŒโˆ—) +๐œŽห† ๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒโˆ—)

โˆ’

โˆ’๐œ‚๐‘€(๐œŒ๐‘–) +๐œŽห†๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ๐‘–)

=

โˆซ ๐œŒโˆ— ๐œŒ๐‘–

2 ๐œŒ

ห† ๐œŽ๐‘€

๐œƒ ๐œƒ โˆ’๐œŽห†๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ

๐‘‘๐œŒ (3.95) ๐‘ =

โˆซ ๐œŒโˆ— ๐œŒ๐‘–

2 ๐œŒ

ห† ๐œŽ๐‘€

๐œƒ ๐œƒ โˆ’๐œŽห†๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ

๐‘‘๐œŒ . (3.96) The right-hand side requires a change of integration variable from ๐œŒ to ๐‘…. Noting that๐‘‘๐œŒ= 1

๐œ†(๐‘…)2๐‘‘๐‘…, we obtain an expression for the inner pressure:

๐‘ =

โˆซ ๐‘…โˆ—

๐‘…๐‘–

2 ๐œ†(๐‘…)3๐‘…

๐œŽห†๐‘€

๐œƒ ๐œƒ(๐œŒ =๐œ†(๐‘…)๐‘…) โˆ’๐œŽห†๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ =๐œ†(๐‘…)๐‘…)

๐‘‘๐‘… . (3.97)

Case 3

In Case 3, all of the balloon is in region ๐‘€. The two boundary conditions for this case are:

โˆ’๐œ‚๐‘€(๐œŒ= ๐œŒ๐‘–) +๐œŽห† ๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ = ๐œŒ๐‘–) =โˆ’๐‘ (3.98)

โˆ’๐œ‚๐‘€(๐œŒ =๐œŒ๐‘œ) +๐œŽห†๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ =๐œŒ๐‘œ) =0. (3.99)

The stress in region ๐‘€ can be found in Eqns. 3.63 and 3.64. The ๐œŒ equilibrium equation yields:

๐‘‘๐œŽ๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ

๐‘‘๐œŒ +2

๐œŽ๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ

๐œŒ

โˆ’ 1 ๐œŒ

๐œŽ๐‘€

๐œƒ ๐œƒ +๐œŽ๐‘€

๐œ™ ๐œ™

=0 (3.100) ๐‘‘(โˆ’๐œ‚๐‘€ +๐œŽห† ๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ) ๐‘‘๐œŒ

+ 1 ๐œŒ

2 ห†๐œŽ๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒโˆ’๐œŽห† ๐‘€

๐œƒ ๐œƒ โˆ’๐œŽห†๐‘€

๐œ™ ๐œ™

=0 (3.101)

โˆซ ๐œŒ๐‘œ

๐œŒ๐‘–

๐‘‘

โˆ’๐œ‚๐‘€ +๐œŽห†๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ

=โˆ’

โˆซ ๐œŒ๐‘œ

๐œŒ๐‘–

2 ๐œŒ

ห† ๐œŽ๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒโˆ’๐œŽห† ๐‘€

๐œƒ ๐œƒ

๐‘‘๐œŒ (3.102)

โˆ’๐œ‚๐‘€(๐œŒ๐‘œ) +๐œŽห†๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ๐‘œ)

โˆ’

โˆ’๐œ‚๐‘€(๐œŒ๐‘–) +๐œŽห†๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ๐‘–)

=

โˆซ ๐œŒ๐‘œ

๐œŒ๐‘–

2 ๐œŒ

ห† ๐œŽ๐‘€

๐œƒ ๐œƒ โˆ’๐œŽห†๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ

๐‘‘๐œŒ (3.103) ๐‘=

โˆซ ๐œŒ๐‘œ

๐œŒ๐‘–

2 ๐œŒ

ห† ๐œŽ๐‘€

๐œƒ ๐œƒ โˆ’๐œŽห†๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ

๐‘‘๐œŒ .

(3.104) As in Case 2, we employ a change of integration variable from ๐œŒ to ๐‘… and obtain the inner pressure as:

๐‘ =

โˆซ ๐‘…๐‘œ

๐‘…๐‘–

2 ๐œ†(๐‘…)3๐‘…

๐œŽห†๐‘€

๐œƒ ๐œƒ(๐œŒ =๐œ†(๐‘…)๐‘…) โˆ’๐œŽห†๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ =๐œ†(๐‘…)๐‘…)

๐‘‘๐‘… . (3.105) Case 4

In Case 4, all of the balloon is in region๐‘†. Note that only the isotropic state (๐‘Ÿ =1) falls under this case. The two boundary conditions specific to this case are

โˆ’๐œ‚๐‘†(๐œŒ =๐œŒ๐‘–) +๐œŽห†๐‘†

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ= ๐œŒ๐‘–) =โˆ’๐‘ (3.106)

โˆ’๐œ‚๐‘†(๐œŒ = ๐œŒ๐‘œ) +๐œŽห†๐‘†

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ = ๐œŒ๐‘œ) =0. (3.107)

The stress in region ๐‘† can be found in Eqns. 3.65 and 3.66. The ๐œŒ equilibrium equation yields:

๐‘‘๐œŽ๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ

๐‘‘๐œŒ +2

๐œŽ๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ

๐œŒ

โˆ’ 1 ๐œŒ

๐œŽ๐‘€

๐œƒ ๐œƒ +๐œŽ๐‘€

๐œ™ ๐œ™

=0 (3.108) ๐‘‘(โˆ’๐œ‚๐‘€ +๐œŽห† ๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ) ๐‘‘๐œŒ

+ 1 ๐œŒ

2 ห†๐œŽ๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒโˆ’๐œŽห† ๐‘€

๐œƒ ๐œƒ โˆ’๐œŽห†๐‘€

๐œ™ ๐œ™

=0 (3.109)

โˆซ ๐œŒ๐‘œ

๐œŒ๐‘–

๐‘‘

โˆ’๐œ‚๐‘€ +๐œŽห†๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ

=โˆ’

โˆซ ๐œŒ๐‘œ

๐œŒ๐‘–

2 ๐œŒ

ห† ๐œŽ๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒโˆ’๐œŽห† ๐‘€

๐œƒ ๐œƒ

๐‘‘๐œŒ (3.110)

โˆ’๐œ‚๐‘€(๐œŒ๐‘œ) +๐œŽห†๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ๐‘œ)

โˆ’

โˆ’๐œ‚๐‘€(๐œŒ๐‘–) +๐œŽห†๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ๐‘–)

=

โˆซ ๐œŒ๐‘œ

๐œŒ๐‘–

2 ๐œŒ

ห† ๐œŽ๐‘€

๐œƒ ๐œƒ โˆ’๐œŽห†๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ

๐‘‘๐œŒ (3.111) ๐‘=

โˆซ ๐œŒ๐‘œ

๐œŒ๐‘–

2 ๐œŒ

ห† ๐œŽ๐‘€

๐œƒ ๐œƒ โˆ’๐œŽห†๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ

๐‘‘๐œŒ .

(3.112) As in Case 2, we employ a change of integration variable from ๐œŒ to ๐‘… and obtain the inner pressure as:

๐‘ =

โˆซ ๐‘…๐‘œ

๐‘…๐‘–

2 ๐œ†(๐‘…)3๐‘…

๐œŽห†๐‘€

๐œƒ ๐œƒ(๐œŒ =๐œ†(๐‘…)๐‘…) โˆ’๐œŽห†๐‘€

๐œŒ ๐œŒ(๐œŒ =๐œ†(๐‘…)๐‘…)

๐‘‘๐‘… . (3.113) Results

The calculations were performed inMATLAB. The solutions are plotted in Figures 3.4โ€“

3.5b with the inner radius ๐‘…๐‘– =1 cm and outer radius ๐‘…๐‘œ =1.1 cm. The following parameters for the generalized Mooney-Rivlin model were used: ๐‘€ = 2, ๐‘ = 1, ๐‘1=1.0ยท105Pa,๐‘2=1.90ยท102Pa,๐‘‘1 =1.59ยท10โˆ’2Pa,๐‘1=1.3,๐‘2=5, and๐‘ž1=2.

This yields an effective shear modulus ๐œ‡= 12 ร๐‘

๐‘–=1๐‘๐‘–๐‘๐‘–+ร๐‘€ ๐‘—=1๐‘‘๐‘—๐‘ž๐‘—

=6.52ยท104 Pa.

The pressure๐‘, normalized by the effective shear modulus๐œ‡, is plotted as a function of the azimuthal stretch at the outer radius ๐œ†๐‘œ. Figure 3.4 shows the comparison between the generalized Mooney-Rivlin model of this work and the BTW (neo- Hookean) model of previous work in the field [23] for an anisotropy parameter of ๐‘Ÿ =8. The neo-Hookean model is unable to capture the correct effect of elasticity in the material at very high values of stretch (e.g. for๐œ†๐‘œgreater than about 6). As seen in experiments of rubber balloons [73], the balloon experiences a subsequent

Figure 3.4: Comparison of this workโ€™s generalized Mooney-Rivlin model with the trace formula model of [23] for inflation pressure of a spherical balloon.

stiffening due to the further stretching of the polymer, or โ€œeffects of the limited extensibility of the network", as indicated by the increase in pressure at high stretch, which is correctly captured by our generalized Mooney-Rivlin model.

(a) (b)

Figure 3.5: Spherical balloon results: (a) Pressure-stretch curves at varying anisotropy parameter. (b) Progression of the spherical balloon solution through individual case numbers.

Figure 3.5a shows the results for varying anisotropy parameter๐‘Ÿ. The response of the balloon is stiffest in the isotropic state (๐‘Ÿ = 1), and gets correspondingly softer as ๐‘Ÿ increases, as expected. As the pressure ๐‘ increases, the balloon undergoes deformation according to the various cases, as seen in Figure 3.5b. For ๐‘Ÿ = 1 (rubber), the balloon is in Case 1 (region๐ฟ) at๐œ†๐‘œ=1 when there is no deformation, but for the rest of the deformation the balloon is entirely in region๐‘†, corresponding to a solid-like response with no microstructure formation, since the material is a rubber with no liquid crystals. For๐‘Ÿ > 1, the solutions move progressively from Case 1

to 2 to 3 throughout the deformation. At a stretch of ๐œ†๐‘œ = 1, the balloon is again in Case 1, corresponding to being entirely in the ๐ฟ region because no deformation has occurred. Immediately upon inflation of the balloon, the balloon jumps to Case 2, where the inner part of the balloon experiences region ๐‘€, developing fine-scale microstructure. Then shortly after, the balloon will become entirely in region ๐‘€, and the rest of the balloon will develop fine-scale microstructure in response to the pressure. This formation of microstructure by the liquid crystal molecules creates a softer response than the rubber without liquid crystals.