• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION

A. Findings

CHAPTER IV

FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION

In this chapter consist of findings of the research and its discussion of the interpretation of the data analysis covers of the result of data collected through the observation and test

in every meeting, but the improvement was not too significant even still classified in fairly good, it caused of some factors, they are;

a.1. Some students often fell nervous when the teacher asked them to speak up

a.2. The students did not have self confidence

a.3. The students lazy to added their vocabulary before

a.4. some students were still confused with Word on hat game and it make them became flustered to implement in the classroom.

a.5. The students were worried to make mistake in choose appropriate word in played word on hat game

a.6. Learning time which very limited

The data about the students’participation based on observations of the researchers in the first cycle can be seen in the following table below

Table 1: Students’ participation score on cycle 1

No Cycle 1 Number of students Frequency percentage Average score

1 First meeting 27 37 34,26%

2 Second meeting 29 56 48,28% 52,61%

3 Third meeting 28 71 63,39%

4 Fourth meeting 30 77 64,17%

On the table above we can see the students’ participation in each meeting there is an improvement, but not too significant, or can be said that the students' participation is still low, which means that not all students are active during the learning process, it may be caused by the condition of the student or the strategy of learning that has not been fully covers all students.

A.2.The students’ participation in speaking class on cycle 2

Because of the students' participation is still relatively low or fairly good in the first cycle, the researchers start the second cycle, which also consisted of four meetings, on this cycle researchers are actively combines the application of a word on a hat game strategy with the subject matter in the learning process, which makes the students more active, so based on of researchers’ observations during the second cycle, there is a significant improvement on of the students’participation, because using the word on hat game strategy . Data from the students’participation in the cycle 2 during the learning process can be seen in the following table below;

Table 2: the students’participation score on cycle 2

No Cycle 2 Number of students Frequency Percentage Average score

1 First meeting 32 92 71,87%

2 Second meeting 32 98 76.56% 82,22%

3 Third meeting 32 111 86,72%

4 Fourth meeting 32 120 93,75%

In the table above we can see the improvement of the students’

participations in the cycle 2 during the four meetings there was an improvement, and based on the observation of student participation as very good, or it can be said almost all students have been active in the learning process, which makes the atmosphere of the class is very effective in learning.

At the end of the second cycle could play the Word on hat game :

a.2.1. Almost all of the students became active and enthusiastic when they played the word on hat game

a.2.2. The students very active to look for the new vocabulary a.2.3. All of the students have good self-confidence in speaking

a.2.4. Just a little of the students asked to the teacher about the meaning of the word

a.2.5. The students have more variant in learning speaking

a.2.6. The students became more enjoyed in speaking class without fell nervous any more.

A.3. The Improvement of the Students’ Participation in speaking class from cycle 1 to cycle 2.

The result of the observation of the students’ participation in speaking class trough word on hat game in improving students’ activeness in speaking class at the eleventh grade students of MA Manongkoki Kabupaten Takalar was conducted in 2 cycles during 8 meetings is taken by the researcher

through observation sheet. It can be seen clearly through from the following table :

Table 3 : The Improvement of the students’ participation in speaking class

Cycle Meeting Average

score

Improve ment

1st 2nd 3rd 4th

1 34,62 % 48,28% 63,39 % 64, 17% 52,61 % 29,61 % 2 71,87 % 76, 56 % 86,72 % 93,75% 82,22 %

The table explained that the average of the students’ participation in speaking class in teaching and learning process trough observation sheet by the researcher. The table above shows the process of the students’ activity in each meeting. The average score in every cycle, in cycle 1 is 52,61 % and in cycle 2 is 82,22 %. Therefore, the improvement of the students’ participation is 29,61 %.

The result of the students’ observation about their participation can also be shown in the graphic below:

The chart above shows that the students’ activeness in cycle 1 was lower than the students’ participation in cycle 2. It was caused in cycle 1 word on hat game strategy was unfamiliar with them especially in learning process.

They were still did not know what kind of the technique, steps and the purpose. The researcher also limited the students chance to speak intensively.

As a result they were less active to participate in learning and teaching process.

In the cycle 2, the researcher gave more explanation about information gap till they were understand . As a result, the students became accustom with it. They got many chance to speak up, and more explore their ability in speaking than in previous cycle. Trough the chart above, the researcher

0 20 40 60 80 100

Category 1

The chart above shows that the students’ activeness in cycle 1 was lower than the students’ participation in cycle 2. It was caused in cycle 1 word on hat game strategy was unfamiliar with them especially in learning process.

They were still did not know what kind of the technique, steps and the purpose. The researcher also limited the students chance to speak intensively.

As a result they were less active to participate in learning and teaching process.

In the cycle 2, the researcher gave more explanation about information gap till they were understand . As a result, the students became accustom with it. They got many chance to speak up, and more explore their ability in speaking than in previous cycle. Trough the chart above, the researcher

Category 2

Category 3

Category 4

Dokumen terkait