CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION
A. General Description
1. Description of The Research Location a. History of SMP Darul 'Ulum Sekampung
SMP Darul 'Ulum originates from Sumbergede Village Kec.
Sekampung Kab. East Lampung is a formal educational institution founded by Yayasan Pondok Pesantren Darul 'Ulum Sekampung. The school is located on Jalan Campus Ma'arif NU 5 with limits:
1) East borders with the land of Mr. Amir Fatah and Giono 2) West bordering the land of Mr. Abu Sahlan and Sugianto 3) The north is bordered by the highway
4) South is adjacent to the land of Ibu Hj. Sudarmi
SMP Darul 'Ulum was established in 2003 at the initiative of Mr. KH.
A. Mudjab Kh, as Chairman of the Foundation Pondul Pesantren Darul 'Ulum which was founded on an area of + 500 m2.
Background of Mr Drs.KH.A. Mudjab, in addition to his own sincere intentions, also the demands and encouragement of the community as a container of procurement plus students who are equipped with ready-to-use science to be deployed to the community, thus erected the building and
35
then opened to study in 2003 the first held for the level Junior high school with 40 students, with 15 teachers and 3 study rooms.
By Mr. Drs. Kh. A. Mudjab Kh, Head of SMP Darul 'Ulum mandated to Bpk. Fitriyanto, S.Ag. in 2004. As for the number of students at that time reached 89 students.
In 2005, the replacement of Junior Darul 'Ulum Junior High School headed by Bpk. Fitriyanto, S. Ag, to Bpk. Drs. Sukiman, the development of Darul 'Ulum Junior High School is getting better, so at the beginning of 2006, SMP Darul' Ulum can conduct the State Examination in its own place with the recognized (accredited) SMP. In 2009 the leadership of SMP Darul 'Ulum was handed over to Bpk. Afif Isa Anshori, S.Pd.I, until 2010, followed by Mr. Zainul Fu'at, S. Ag (2010-2011) and Mr. Rajiyo, A.Ma.Pd until 2015 with the development of Darul 'Ulum Junior High School and an increase in the number of students reaches 165 students.
Headmaster History 2003 – 2005 : Fitriyanto, S.Ag 2005 – 2009 : Drs. Sukiman
2009 – 2010 : Afif Isa Anshori, S.Pd.I 2010 – 2011 : Zainul Fu‟at, S.Ag 2011 – 2015 : Rajiyo, A.Ma.Pd
2015 – Now : Ahmad Abroza, M.Pd.I
36 b. School Profile
1) School Name : SMP Darul 'Ulum 2) Address / Village : Sumbergede 56 A
District: Sekampung Regency: East Lampung Province: Lampung No. Phone: 0725-49105
3) Foundation Name : Yayasan Pon-Pes Darul 'Ulum 4) School Status : Private / Accredited B
5) Institutional Decree : No. 800/567/15 / SK / 03 6) NSS (12 digits) : 202120403130
7) School Type : Private 8) Year Established / Operated : 2003
9) Land Status : Owned Foundation
10) Land Area : 2,900 m2
11) Name of Principal : Ahmad Abroza, M.Pd.I 12) Working Period : 1 year 5 months
c. Vission and Mission of SMP Darul ‘Ulum Sekampung
Vision and Mission are the signs used as a reference step SMP Darul 'Ulum which then must be implemented by the Principal assisted teachers and other devices.
37 1) Vission
To produce qualified human resources of Islami populist and democratic and able to participate.
2) Mission
a) Striving to improve the quality of education in schools and nationally.
b) Develop an educational system that is expected to foster a critical awareness of students' attitudes and behavior in an Islamic way.
c) Putting students as subjects of knowledge and shaping themselves through the development of their entire intelligence.
d) Improve the quality of education that produces qualified students to further develop the quality of the people and realize the life of a just and democratic society.
e) Education to develop skills and skills and knowledge to further develop for real intelligence in society.
38 d. Stucture of Organization
The structure of organization of SMP Darul „Ulum Sekampung is stated below:
ORGANIZATION STRUCTURES OF SMP DARUL ‘ULUM SEKAMPUNG
committee Hi. Asfar S.
The Head Master A.Abroza, M.Pd.I
treasurer Farhan Rodli, S.Pd.Ing Curriculum Representative
Nur Baiti, S.Pd laboratory Sunarto, S.Pd.I
library Ensi Dwi E., S.Pd.I
Teacher 8.2
A.Wicaksono, S.Pd
Teacher 7.1 Nasrullah
Teacher 7.2 Apriani, S.Pd
Teacher 8.1
Z. Mubtadi‟in, M.Pd
Principal Lilik Indrawati,S.Pd
S.Pd.
Homeroom Teacher
The Teachers
Teacher 9.2 Sukiyatno Teacher 9.1
Sunarto, S.Pd.I
39
e. Condition of The Teachers and Employers
The condition of the teachers and employers in SMP Darul „Ulum Sekampung is stated below:
Table 3
Condition of Teachers and Employers
No Name Sex Propiciency
1 Ahmad Abroza, M.Pd.I Male Head Master
2 Arini, S.E female Art teacher
3 Drs. Bahruddin Male Mtk Teacher
4 Ensi Dwi Eliawati, S.Pd.I female Indonesian teacher 5 Farhan Rodli, S.Pd.Ing Male English Teacher
6 Khamidin, S.Pd Male Java Teacher
7 Lilik Indrawati, S.Pd female SainsTeacher
8 Nur Baiti, S.Pd female English Teacher
9 Siti Saudah, S.Pd Female IPS Teacher
10 Rajiyo, A.Ma.Pd Male Lampung Teacher
11 Sukiyatno Male Aswaja Teacher
12 Sunarto, S.Pd.I Male Sport Teacher
13 Tatok Suranto, S.Pd Male MTK Teacher
14 Wiwik Khoiriyah, S.Pd.I Female Islamic Teacher 15 Zainul Mubtadi'in, M.Pd Male Islamic Teacher 16 Agustiyan Wicaksono, S,Pd Male Sport Teacher
17 nasrullah Male Aswaja Teacher
18 Muhammad Ismail Male Official Employe
19 Apriani Female Official Employe
20 Cantika Female Official Employe
f. Condition of Student
The condition of students in SMP darul „Ulum Sekampung is stated as follows:
40 Table 4
Recapitulation of Students in SMP darul „Ulum Sekampung
NO Classes
Sex
Total
Male Female
1. Class VII 17 34 51
2. Class VIII 15 29 44
3. Class IX 15 26 41
Total 47 89 136
Source: documentation of SMP darul „Ulum Sekampung gathered on 14th, November 2017.
g. Condition of Facilities
The condition of facilities in SMP Darul „Ulum Sekampung is stated below:
Table 5
Recapitulation Facilities in SMP Darul „Ulum Sekampung
NO FACILITIES QUANTITY
1 Classroom (ClassVII-IX) 6
2 Headmaster Room 1
3 Teacher Room 1
4 TU Room 1
5 Laboratory 1
6 Library 4
41
7 OSIS Room 1
8 Parking Area 1
9 Teacher Toilet 1
10 Student Toilet 2
11 Canteen 3
Source: documentation of SMP Darul „Ulum Sekampung gathered on 14th, November 2017.
42
h. Location Sketch of of SMP Darul ‘Ulum Sekampung
Location sketch of SMP Darul „Ulum Sekampung is stated below:
HIGHWAY
GATE DOOR
1 2 3
4 5 6
16
7 8 9
10 11 12
13 14 15
43 2. Description of Research Data
a. Pre-Test Result
To known the ability of the students before giving the treatment without Cooperative Integreted Reading and Composition in Reading Comprehension, the students were giving a pre test that must be done individually.
Teacher asked them to do 20 items multiple choice that consist of the material is deskriptive text, the time given 45 minutes. To measure the Students‟ Reading Comprehension in English materials, the writer tested the students by giving them multiple choice English materials about deskriptive text.
The result of pre test the student‟s Reading Comprehension can be identified as follows:
Table 6
The Pre-Test Result of the Eight Grade Students at SMP Darul „Ulum Sekampung
No Codes of Respondents Pre-test Scores
1 AMW 55
2 AF 60
3 AK 45
4 AA 45
5 AIS 80
6 AL 50
7 AU 70
8 APK 35
9 AMS 45
10 DS 50
44
11 DN 70
12 DEY 65
13 DV 45
14 DAM 70
15 ES 50
16 FFF 30
17 GTU 70
18 IMI 30
19 INT 70
20 IP 70
21 ISH 45
Total 1120
avarage 53.3
Source: documentation of pre-test result of reading Comprehension on 17th, July 2017.
From the data above, it could be found that the highest scores was 80 and the lowest scores was 30. In line with the data, the researcher measured the class interval by using the formula as follows:
K = 1 + 3,3 log n K = 1 + 3,3 log 21 K = 1 + 3,3 x 1,32 K = 1 + 4.36 K = 5, 36 = 5
R = the highest scores – the lowest scores R = 80 - 30
R = 50
45 I =
I = 10
Where:
K = number of interval class
R = distance of maximum and minimum scores I = length of interval class (total of interval class) N = total participants/students
The total of interval class (I) in this research was 10. Then, it was used to measure the data by presenting it on the table of frequencies distribution below:
Table 7
Table of frequency distribution of students‟ pre-test result of reading Comprehension at the eleventh grade of SMP Darul „Ulum Sekampung
No Interval Classes Frequencies Percentages
1 80-89 1 4.76%
2 70 – 79 6 28.6%
3 60 – 69 2 9.5%
4 50 – 59 4 19%
5 40– 49 5 23.8%
6 30– 39 3 14.3%
Total 21 100%
Further, based on the table of frequency distribution above, it could be inferred that from 21 students as the sample of the research, just for about 7
46
students who had got the score similar to or higher than MMC, which is 70.
The data revealed that 3 students got the score between 30 – 39 or as many as 14.3%. Next, there were 5 students got the score between 40 – 49 or as many as 23.8%. There were 4 students who got the score between 50 – 59 or in the other words, as many as 19%. Besides, there were 2 students who got the score between 60 - 69 and 6 students got the score between 70 - 79 in percentage of 28.6% and 40% of each. The last, there were 1 students who got the score between 80 – 89 or as many as 4.76%.
In summary, from the result of pre-test, the researcher found that the students‟ problem was in using ineffective method in teaching learning process. As a result, most of the students got the scores lower than MMC.
b. Post-test Result
After considering the pre-test result of reading comprehension in multiple choise, the researcher conducted the treatment of cooperative integreted reading and composition to help the students getting better understanding of reading comprahension. Be ware of that, the researcher identified the students‟ difficulty in comprehension and offered method cooperative integreted reading and composition to know if there was positive and significant influence of it.
Furthermore, after the students in this class had been given the treatment of method cooperative integreted reading and composition and they had
47
understood already, the researcher gave the post-test to measure their reading comprehension in multiple choise. The result of post-test could be seen below:
Table 8
The students‟ post-test result circ method toward the student reading comprehension at the eight grade of SMP Darul „Ulum Sekampung
No Codes of Respondents Pre-test Scores
1 AMW 70
2 AF 75
3 AK 70
4 AA 60
5 AIS 85
6 AL 60
7 AU 80
8 APK 60
9 AMS 55
10 DS 75
11 DN 80
12 DEY 70
13 DV 70
14 DAM 85
15 ES 65
16 FFF 65
17 GTU 85
18 IMI 75
19 INT 75
20 IP 85
21 ISH 70
Total 1515
avarage 72.1
Source: documentation of post-test result of grammatical cohesion in essay writing gathered on 24th, November 2017.
From the data above, it could be found that the highest scores was 88 and the lowest scores was 55. In line with the data, the researcher measured the class interval by using the formula as follows:
48 K = 1 + 3,3 log n
K = 1 + 3,3 log 21 K = 1 +3,3 x 1.32 K = 1 + 4.36 K = 5.36 = 5
R = the highest scores – the lowest scores R = 85 – 55
R = 30 I =
I = 6
Where:
K = number of interval class
R = distance of maximum and minimum scores I = length of interval class (total of interval class) N = total participants/students
49
The total of interval class (I) in this research was 6. Then, it was used to measure the data by presenting it on the table of frequencies distribution below:
Table 9
Table of frequency distribution of students‟ post-test result reading comprehension at the eleventh grade of SMP Darul „Ulum Sekampung
No Interval Classes Frequencies Percentages
1 85 – 90 4 19%
2 79 – 84 2 9.52%
3 73 – 78 2 9.52%
4 67 – 72 6 28.57%
5 61 – 66 3 14.28%
6 55 – 60 4 19%
Total 21 100%
Further, based on the table of frequency distribution above, it could be inferred that from 21 students as the sample of this research, there were 15 students got the score similar to or higher than MMC, which is 70. To be known, there were 4 students who got the score between 55-60 or as many as 19%, and there were 3 students who got the score between 61-66 or as many as 14.28% and there were 6 students who got the score between 67-72 or as many as 28.52%. In addition, there were 2 students who got the score between 73 – 78 or as many as 9.52% and there were 8 students who got the score between 79-84 or as many as 9.52%. The last, there were 4 students who got the score between 85-90 or as many as 19%.
To sum up, the post-test result was categorized into sufficient category even though several students was still lack on cooperative integreted reading
50
and composition inreading comprehension, but on the whole, there was certain influence to help the students get better understanding.